HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.10.19 Parks and Rec Packet
C ity of F armington
430 T hird S treet
F armington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 - F ax 651.280.6899
www.c i.farmingto n.mn.us
F armington P arks and Recreation Commission
Wednesday, July 10, 2019
7:00 P M City Hall
Agenda
I.Call M eeting to Order
I I.Approve M eeting Agenda
I I I.Approve M eeting M inutes
A.A pprove May 8, 2019 P ark and Recreation Commission and Rambling River
Center A dvisory Board J oint Meeting Minutes
B.A pprove May 8, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes
I V.Presentations
A.S chmitz-Maki Arena W inter I ce Rental and Spring Turf and Event Season Reports
B.S ummer Activities P assport P rogram
V.Business Items
A.A pprove Community Garden Memorandum of Understanding
B.Recommend 2020 Parks and Recreation Department Fees and Charges
C.A genda I tems for Meeting with E mpire Township's P ark and Recreation
Commission
D.A pprove P arks and Facilities Tour with the City Council
E.A pprove 2030 Park I mprovement F und Financial P lan
V I.Discussion Items
A.Review 2019 Work Plan
B.A dopted F armington B ike Pedestrian P lan
V I I.Commission Roundtable
A.Round Table Format
V I I I.Staff Report/Updates
A.I nformational Updates
I X .M eeting Agenda Topics
A.I tems for S eptember 11, 2019 Meeting Agenda
X .Adjournment
"T he Farm ington P arks and Recreation Advisory Commission's m ission is to advise and make
recom m endations to the Farm ington City Council concerning the com prehensive planning of the City
parks, trails, open space, recreation facilities and recreation programs."
TO:F armington P arks and R ecreation C ommis s ion Members
F R O M:R andy Dis tad, P arks and R ec reation Direc tor
S UB J E C T:Approve May 8, 2019 P ark and R ecreation C ommis s ion and R ambling R iver C enter
Advis ory Board Joint Meeting Minutes
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
Attached are the draft minutes from the May 8, 2019 meeting between the R ambling R iver C enter Advis ory
Board and the P ark and R ec reation C ommission. C ommission members are asked to review the minutes
and provide at the meeting any correc tions or additions to the minutes that are needed.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Draft Meeting Minutes
Minutes from the May 8, 2019 Joint Meeting of the Farmington Parks and
Recreation Commission and Rambling River Center Advisory Board
Park and Recreation Commission (Commission) Members Present: Laurie Suchanek, David McMillen,
Ashley Crabtree, Elizabeth Koss and Brian Tennant
Rambling River Center Advisory Board (Advisory Board) Members Present: Pennie Page, Pat Hennen,
Joan Moes, and Roger Wood
Rambling River Center Advisory Board Members Absent: Blanche Reichert and Marjorie Koski
Other’s Present: Recreation Supervisor Missie Kohlbeck and Parks and Recreation Director Randy Distad
I. Call To Order
Commission Chair Suchanek called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Quorum was present.
II. Approval of Agenda
Moved by Tennant and seconded by McMillen to approve the meeting agenda. APIF. Motion carried.
III. Presentation
A. Introductions
Commission and Board members introduced themselves and provide information about how long they have
served on their respective board and commmission.
B. 2019 Work Plans
Director Distad and Recreation Supervisor Kohlbeck reviewed the work plans for the Advisory Board and
Commission and noted the progress being made on completing all of the goals and objectives that are
included in the work plans.
IV. Discussion Items
A. Rambling River Center Logo Design
Recreation Supervisor Kohlbeck provided history about a past attempt to have a logo designed. She shared it
wasn’t successful, so contact was made with the consultant hired to create the new city logo and a reduced
cost was negotiated with the consultant to create some draft logos. General direction given to the consultant
was to mimic the new city logo but not copy it.
The consultant then provided draft logos that were reviewed by the Advisory Board during its April 8
meeting and direction was given by the Advisory Board to refine the logo from the provided options into a
three options using a combination of the different logo features. The consultant created three options for the
Advisory Board to review and choose from. The logos that were included in the meeting packet reflect the
initial logo designs and the refined three options. She informed everyone the Advisory Board would be
reviewing and selecting one of the three logo options at their May 13 meeting.
Director Distad asked if the Commission and Advisory Board members favored one of the three options.
General consensus was that the option that included the thicker wavy lines with the Rambling River Center
name written after it was favored.
B. Rambling River Center Fundraising
Director Distad reviewed the fundraising events that are typically undertaken by the Advisory Board and
how fundraising has been profitable, which has allowed many building improvements to be completed and
new equipment and furniture purchased for the Rambling River Center. He reviewed the list of the building
improvements and equipment and furniture purchased since 2012. He informed the group that the
fundraising money that is netted after expenses is placed into a fund that is earmarked only for the Rambling
River Center and is carried from year to year.
McMillen informed Commission members that they should consider volunteering to help at the fundraising
events if their schedule allows. Wood shared he is in charge of organizing the sale of the tickets for the
Waffle Breakfast, which will be held on October 26, 2019. He further informed Commission members that
if they would like to purchase tickets to the Waffle Breakfast the will be available for sale this fall.
C. Rambling River Center Building Tour
A building tour was led by staff. Various rooms were shown and past building improvements and equipment
and furniture purchased with fundraising funds were identified during the tour.
V. Adjournment
Moved by McMillen and seconded by Crabtree to adjourn the meeting. APIF. Motion carried.
Meeting was adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Randy Distad
Parks and Recreation Director and Recording Secretary
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Approve May 8, 2019 R egular Meeting Minutes
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
Attached are the draft minutes from the P ark and R ec reation C ommission's May 8, 2019 meeting.
C ommis s ion members are as ked to review the minutes and provide at the meeting any correc tions or
additions to the minutes that are needed.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Draft May 8, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes
Farmington Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Minutes from the May 8, 2019 Regular Meeting
Members Present: Laurie Suchanek, David McMillen, Brian Tennant, Ashley Crabtree and Elizabeth Koss
Members Absent: None
Other’s Present: Parks and Recreation Director Randy Distad
I. Call Meeting To Order
Chair Suchanek called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Quorum was present.
II. Approval of May 8, 2019 Meeting Agenda
Moved by Crabtree and seconded by Koss to approve the meeting agenda as written. All persons in favor (APIF). Motion
carried.
III. Approval of March 13, 2019 Regular Meeting Minutes
The meeting minutes were approved with no revisions identified.
IV. Presentations
None
V. Business Items
A. City Council Parks and Facilities Tour
Commission members were informed the August 14 date will work for the City Council to tour parks and recreational
facilities with the Commission. Director Distad asked if there were any park and or faciliites the Commission would like
to tour. The following locations were identified:
Prairie Pines Park (ribbon cutting of new playground)
Marigold Park (ribbon cutting of new playground)
Schmitz-Maki Arena (look at future facility improvements)
Rambling River Center (look at general condition and recent improvements)
Evergreen Knoll Park (see site of community garden)
Flagstaff Meadow Park in Regetta Fields development
Rambling River Park (streambank restoration area)
Farmington Preserve Park (basketball court surfacing project)
Director Distad shared he would develop a tour schedule around the park and recreational facilities the Commission
identified and it would be reviewed at the next Commission meeting.
B. Commission Member Group Photo
Commission members posed for a group photo that will be placed on the Commission’s webpage on the city’s website.
C. June Meeting Date
There was general discussion around the June 12 meeting date and it falling during the city’s Dew Days celebration.
Director Distad shared the meeting could be cancelled if the Commission wanted to because currently there wasn’t
anything pressing to make a decision on at this meeting. He suggested the Commission select a different date in June to
have the meeting and if there wasn’t a need to have the meeting, it could be cancelled. After some general discussion, it
was determined the alternate meeting date would be June 19. Moved by McMillen and seconded by Koss to move the
meeting to June 19, but the meeting could be cancelled if there wasn’t a pressing need to have it. APIF. Motion carried.
Director Distad said he would inform Commission members if the meeting was cancelled due to no pressing issues to
meet on. He said if the meeting was cancelled, official notice would be sent out about the meeting being cancelled.
D. Approve Park Improvement Fund Financial Plans
Director Distad reviewed the 2020-2024 Park Improvement Fund’s five year capital improvement plan. He noted during
the years 2020 and 2021 there were only a few projects identified to be completed in order to allow the fund balance to
grow. He shared in 2022, it was projected that Flagstaff Meadow Park would be initially developed. Then beginning in
2023, existing parks would be funded to receive redevelopment work in the park, which would primarily include
replacement of the playground equipment, because it is on a 20 year replacement cycle, and finishing other improvement
that were not completed when the park was initially developed. There is also funding being shown in 2024 for the initial
development of Jim Bell Park and Preserve, which would include site grading and seeding. He asked that the capital
improvement plan be approved by the Commission, so it could be included in the 2020 and 2021 budget document and be
approved by the City Council.
Moved by McMillen and seconded be Tennant to approve the Park Improvement Fund’s 2020-2024 capital improvement
plan and include it in the 2020 and 2021 budget document.
Director Distad also reviewed the Park Improvement Fund’s 2030 Financial Plan. He highlighted how over the next 11
years many of the city’s existing parks are scheduled to be redeveloped because of it being 20 years since each park had
received improvements. He noted this plan still needed some revisions in order for it to match the 2020-2024 capital
improvement plan. As a result, he is not requesting any action on the plan until it can be revised and brought back to the
Commission’s next meeting where it will be approved.
VI. Discussion Items
A. Review Joint Meeting with Rambling River Center Advisory Board
Commission members discussed the meeting that occurred prior to their regular meeting. McMillen shared that he
thought it went well. Crabtree stated she learned a lot about the building and didn’t realize it was available for the public
to rent. She also thought there were many opportunities for projects and partnerships at the RRC. Tennant said he learned
a lot also about the building and would like to see more communication about the building and the programs offered.
Suchanek said it is beneficial to meet with the Advisory Board in order to learn more about what they are doing at the
Rambling River Center for senior programs and events. Koss thought it might be beneficial to publicize and advertise the
RRC during the Dew Days event when people are around the building. By general consensus the Commission felt it was
beneficial to continue meeting annually with the Advisory Board and thought it would be good to do a park and facilities
tour with them in 2020.
B. Review 2019 Work Plan
Suchanek reviewed the work plan and Commission members identified the following goals and objectives that have been
completed since the last Commission meeting:
Goal #1 and objectives #1 and #2 because it took action during tonight’s meeting to provide to the City Council
an approved 2020-2024 park improvement fund capital improvement plan
Director Distad shared he would update the work plan to show these items being completed.
C. Bike Pedestrian Plan Update
Bike Pedestrian Plan public input process has ended and the plan is now moving into creating recommendations and
strategies for implementing the plan and made Commission members aware of the presentation of the draft Bike
Pedestrian Plan being made on Monday, May 20 at 6:00 p.m. to the City Council, Park and Recreation Commission and
Planning Commission.
D. Sapphire Lake Development Park Name
Director Distad suggested that the park name in the development be postponed for the next 3-4 years because access to the
park will not occur until then because the development is being built out west to east and the park is located in the east
part of the development. He offered that this would still leave the option open to name it after the developer if he had a
change of heart about donating the land as a park.
E. Meeting with Empire Township’s Park and Recreation Commission
Director Distad shared the Commission meets with Empire Township’s Park and Recreation Commission every other
year. In 2019 this would be the normal year the meeting occurs. The last time a sit -down meeting was held, besides the
park tour in 2017, it was held in Farmington. This means the meeting would rotate to Empire Township and would be
held on their normal meeting night and time, which is the second and fourth Monday’s of the month. Commission
members discussed possible meeting dates in November and determined November 25 would not be a good night because
it falls around Thanksgiving and the November 11 date will not work because that is a legal holiday. The Commission
then discussed possible October meeting dates and by consensus determined it would like to see if Empire Township
would be available to meet at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, October 28. Director Distad said he would contact the chair of the
Empire Township Park and Recreation Commission to see if this date would work to meet.
VII. Commission Roundtable
Tennant: Noticed there was work being done along Denmark Avenue and next to Boeckman Middle School and asked
what work was being done. Distad shared that it was work being done in preparation of de-watering the Westview Acres
neighborhood for the street infrastructure improvement project that will be occurring in 2019.
Crabtree: Didn’t have anything to share.
McMillen: Didn’t have anything to share.
Koss: Didn’t have anything to share.
Suchanek: Didn’t have anything to share.
VIII. Staff Report
A report was given by Director Distad on the following items:
Events the city offers during Dew Days will be modified to include the bike auction being moved to Friday
evening before the bed races to hopefully have more participation in the auction bidding and the Dew Run start
and end location being moved from the Rambling River Center to City Hall.
Prairie Pines and Marigold Park sites have been graded for playground installation
Provided an update on the Fairhill Estate at North Creek development moving forward with having the
preliminary and final plats being approved by the City Council and staff have requested the additional grading of
the park site and an additional trail connection from the gas pipeline easement along the 190th Street right of way
to the entrance road of the development and are waiting to hear back from the developer on these two requests
IX. Next Meeting Agenda Items
The following items were identified by Commission members for its next meeting agenda:
1. Review 2019 work plan
2. Finalize details for the parks and facilities tour with the City Council
3. Approval of the Park Improvement Fund’s 2030 Financial Plan
4. Presentation about the Schmitz-Maki Arena’s winter ice and turf seasons
5. Bike Pedestrian Plan update
6. Meeting with Empire Township’s Park and Recreation Commission
7. 2020 Park and Recreation Department’s fees and charges recommendation
8. Presentation about the Summer Activities Passport program
X. Adjournment
Moved by Koss and seconded by McMillen to adjourn the meeting. APIF. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at
8:01 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Randy Distad
Parks and Recreation Director and Recording Secretary
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:S chmitz-Maki Arena Winter Ic e R ental and S pring Turf and Event S eason R eports
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
Included in the meeting packet is information about this past winter ic e season and spring turf and event
s eas on at S chmitz-Maki Arena. P ark and F ac ilities S upervis or Jeremy P ire compiled the information and
will be making a pres entation to the C ommis s ion about the report.
C ommis s ion members are as ked to review the report that is included in the meeting packet, listen to the
pres entation and then ask any questions they may have about the report.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material 2018-2019 Winter Ice Season Report
Backup Material 2019 Spring Turf and Event Rental Report
2018-2019 Winter Ice Season Report
SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH TOTAL
FYHA
HOURS RENTED 47 133.25 135.75 118 110.5 116.5 62.5 723.5
REVENUE $10,340.00 $29,195.00 $29,685.00 $25,840.00 $24,250.00 $25,630.00 $12,716.00 $157,656.00
HIGH SCHOOL
HOURS RENTED 0 6 66.75 100.5 97.25 54 0 324.5
REVENUE $0.00 $1,320.00 $14,835.00 $27,414.50 $23,878.25 $14,205.00 $0.00 $81,652.75
SENIOR MEN
HOURS RENTED 0 1 5 3 5 4 2 20
REVENUE $0.00 $160.00 $800.00 $480.00 $800.00 $640.00 $320.00 $3,200.00
MISC.
HOURS RENTED 46 23 2 0 3.25 1 0 75.25
REVENUE $7,360.00 $3,680.00 $320.00 $0.00 $715.00 $220.00 $0.00 $12,295.00
TOTAL
HOURS RENTED 93 163.25 209.5 221.5 216 175.5 64.5 1143.25
REVENUE $17,700.00 $34,355.00 $45,640.00 $53,734.50 $49,643.25 $40,695.00 $13,036.00 $254,803.75
2017-2018 TOTAL
HOURS RENTED 101.25 235 232.5 240.75 180.5 186.5 54.75 1231.25
REVENUE $17,495.00 $45,040.44 $54,912.50 $54,863.66 $40,607.25 $41,987.25 $11,865.00 $266,771.10
Attendance
Halloween Skate 205 145 $47.00
Skate with Santa 215 209 $59.00
Learn to Skate 291
Monetary
Dontation
Pounds of
food donated
PRIME ICE RENTAL RATE $220 HOUR and NON PRIME ICE RENTAL RATE $160 HOUR
2019 Arena Spring Turf and Event Rental Report
2016 2017 2018 2019
HOURS RENTED 99 99 78 88
REVENUE $1,560.00 $660.00 $1,360.00 $1,400.00
HOURS RENTED 3 10.5 17 6
REVENUE $60.00 $210.00 $340.00 $120.00
HOURS RENTED 4 11.5 0 0
REVENUE $80.00 $230.00 $0.00 $0.00
HOURS RENTED 106 121 95 94
REVENUE $1,700.00 $1,100.00 $1,700.00 $1,520.00
2016 2017 2018 2019
Perfectly Unique Craft
Show NA $500.00 $500.00 $500.00
Rambling River Center
Arts and Crafts Show NA NA
cancelled
due to
weather
rental fee not
charged
TOTAL
SPRING TURF RENTALS
FYLA
HIGH SCHOOL
MISCELLANEOUS.
SPRING EVENT RENTALS
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:S ummer Ac tivities P as s port P rogram
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
R ecreation S upervis or Ryan Hayes will be attending the meeting to make a s hort verbal presentation on the
s tatus of how the new S ummer Ac tivities P as s port P rogram has been received by the community.
After his pres entation, C ommis s ion members are enc ouraged to ask ques tions or provide comments about
the program.
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Approve C ommunity G arden Memorandum of Unders tanding
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
At the March 13, 2019 C ommis s ion meeting, direc tion was given to staff to work with Jennifer Lothert on a
draft C ommunity G arden Memorandum of Unders tanding (MO U). S inc e that time, a draft was c reated by
s taff and s hared with Ms. Lothert for her review. In addition, the C ity Attorney has also reviewed the MO U
and has found the MO U to be in an acc eptable format and have the proper legal c ontent.
T he final draft MO U is included in the C ommis s ion's meeting packet for C ommission members to review
prior to the meeting. Ms . Lothert has been invited to attend the meeting. In addition, R ecreation S upervis or
Ryan Hayes will als o be attending becaus e he also worked on drafting the MO U.
C ommis s ion members should come prepared to ask any questions, provide c omments about the MO U and
then onc e satis fied with it, approve the MO U and provide a rec ommendation to the C ity C ouncil to als o
approve it.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Final Draft Community Garden MOU
COMMUNITY GARDEN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
THIS AGREEMENT is made this _____ day of , 2019, by and between the
City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”) and Community Garden Committee
(the “Committee”) and collectively referred to as (the “Parties”).
WHEREAS, the Committee has expressed an interest in using space in a City park to create a free
community garden that people can access as a food source; and,
WHEREAS, a formal written Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) should be created to address each
Parties roles and responsibilities for a community garden; and,
WHEREAS, Evergreen Knoll Park had been identified and agreed upon by the Parties as the site for a
community garden; and,
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the community shall benefit from the garden; and,
WHEREAS, it appears to be in the best interest of the Parties to approve this MOU.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, the Parties hereby agree
to the following:
SECTION 1. TERMS OF AGREEMENT.
1. The Parties shall own and maintain their own tools and equipment that are used on the community
garden site.
2. This Agreement shall be in effect once the proper signatures have been secured and shall not have
a termination date unless either Party wishes to terminate this Agreement as identified in Section
#4 below.
3. The Agreement shall be reviewed annually at a meeting by the Parties in December. Any
revisions to the Agreement that are determined at this meeting will be approved formally by both
Parties.
4. The Parties agree that any equipment being used to maintain the community garden site, shall be
transported to the site by the Party using the equipment, unless other arrangements are made.
5. The Parties agree that any equipment and/or supplies lost, stolen or damaged beyond repair during
the time that the community garden is being operated and maintained, will fall solely on the Party
who owns the equipment to repair or replace it.
SECTION 2. THE COMMITTEE’S ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The Committee will be responsible for the follow community garden roles and responsibilities:
Garden tools and equipment
Providing seeds and plants
Tiller and tilling
Approved organic fertilizers/herbicides/pesticides
Planting, watering, weeding and general maintenance of the garden site
Soil amendments
Garden vandalism
Fence
Hose/sprinkler for watering
Compliance with all park rules and city ordinances
Post-harvest clean up, tilling and erosion control
SECTION 3. THE CITY’S ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The City will be responsible for the following community garden roles and responsibilities:
Location and space for the garden
Water source
Storage space in the building
Parking
Building and park vandalism
Utility costs
Waste containers and removal
Providing and cleaning restrooms
Maintenance of the building
SECTION 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
This Agreement may be terminated by either Party giving 30 day written notice to the other Party.
Once notice of termination is given, then the Committee has up to 30 days to remove all of its
equipment and/or supplies from the storage building in Evergreen Knoll Park.
SECTION 5. OTHER TERMINATION.
NOTWITHSTANDING any other provision, if any local law, rule, regulation, or order prohibits
the activities in this Agreement, then this Agreement shall be immediately terminated with both
Parties owing no further compensation to each other.
SECTION 6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties and no terms may be altered in
any way except by the written consent of both Parties. This Agreement may not be assigned or
conveyed without each Party’s written consent.
COMMUNITY GARDEN COMMITTEE CITY OF FARMINGTON, a
Minnesota Municipal Corporation
BY: BY:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ITS:________________________________ AND:
David McKnight, City Administrator
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:R ecommend 2020 P arks and R ecreation Department F ees and C harges
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
Attached are the staff rec ommended 2020 P ark and R ec reation fees and charges. T he attac hment inc ludes
both the current 2019 fees and c harges and the 2020 staff rec ommended fees and c harges . T he attachment
s hows the R ambling R iver C enter (R R C ) fees and charges that are being recommended by staff to the
R ambling R iver C enter Advis ory Board (Advisory Board). T he Advis ory Board will be reviewing and
recommending to the C ommis s ion at its July 8 meeting the 2020 fees and charges for the R R C . S taff will
verbally provide at the C ommis s ion meeting the Advisory Board's rec ommended 2020 R R C fees and
charges.
T he C ommission is being asked to review the staff rec ommended 2020 P ark and R ec fees prior to the
meeting. T hen C ommis s ion members should come prepared to disc uss them during the meeting in order
to determine if it wishes to further revis e any fees and c harges , s o it c an make a final rec ommendation to the
C ity C ounc il.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Staff Recommended 2020 Fees and Charges
1
2020 Staff Recommended Parks and Recreation Fees........................................
Parkland Contribution
Park Land and Trail Fees - All Residential Zones See Parkland Dedication Ordinance
Park Land and Trail Fees - Commercial/Industrial Zones See Parkland Dedication Ordinance
2019 2020
Park Development Fee – Residential, Commercial/ $23,045.00/acre $23,621.00/acre
Industrial Zones (2.5% increase)
Recreational Program Fees
Programs, Lessons, Activities Cover all direct costs Same
Special Event Minimum or no fee charged Same
City News & Recreation Guide
Advertising Rates (Full Color Advertising)
Government Agencies/ Non-Profits*
Half Page per Publication Rate: $325.00 Same
(H) 7.5 wide x 4.5 high
(V) 3.667 wide x 9.25 high
Half Page 1-year Rate (4 issues per year): $1,040.00/year Same
Quarter Page per Publication Rate: $225.00 Same
3.667 wide x 4.5 high
Quarter Page 1 Year Rate (4 issues per year) $720.00/year Same
*To qualify for non-profit status a 501c3 tax exempt status is required.
Commercial/For Profits:
Half Page per Publication Rate: $375.00 Same
(H) 7.5 wide x 4.5 high
(V) 3.667 wide x 9.25 high
Half Page 1-year Rate (4 issues per year): $1,200.00/year Same
Quarter Page per Publication Rate: $250.00 Same
3.667 wide x 4.5 high
Quarter Page 1 Year Rate (4 issues per year) $800.00/year Same
Schmitz-Maki Arena Fees 7/1/19-6/30/20 7/1/20-6/30/21
Winter Ice Time (Sept – Mid-March)
Prime Time $225.00/hr + tax $230.00/hr + tax
Saturday and Sunday (7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m.)
Monday – Friday (2:00 p.m..–10:00 p.m.)
Non-Prime Time $165.00/hr + tax $170.00/hr + tax
Saturday and Sunday (10:15 p.m. – 6:45 a.m.)
Monday – Friday (10:15 p.m. – 1:45 p.m.)
June and July Summer Ice (June – August) $165.00/hr + tax $170.00/hr + tax
Turf Rental (April-May) $80.00/hr +tax Same
2
2019 2020
August Ice $150.00/hr + tax $155.00 hr + tax
Dry Floor Rental $500.00/day + tax Same
Dry Floor Rental Set Up Tear Down Day $150.00/day + tax Same
Open Skating $5.00/person (inc. tax) Same
Open Skating Free Style $10.00 (inc. tax) Same
Open Hockey $10.00 (inc. tax) Same
Open Skating Punch Card 10 punches $45.00 (inc. tax) Same
(expires at end of Winter Ice Time each year)
Skate Rental $3.00/pr (inc. tax) $4.00/pr (inc. tax)
Skate Sharpening $3.00 per pair or 11 pairs/$30.00 Same
Civic Arena Advertising Rates
Full Wall 4 x 8 Sheet
One Year $430.00/year (inc. tax) Same
Three Years $375.00/year (inc. tax) Same
Half Wall 4 x 4 Sheet
One Year $270.00/year (inc. tax) Same
Three Years $240.00/year (inc. tax) Same
Ice Resurfacer
One Year $725.00/year (inc. tax) Same
Three Years $640.00/year (inc tax) Same
Dasher Boards
One Year $535.00/year (inc. tax) Same
Three Years $480.00/year (inc. tax) Same
Rambling River Center Fees 2019 2020
Annual Membership $37.00/individual $37.00/individual
(to include regular and fitness center membership) (includes tax) (includes tax)
Member Incentive Program 30 day money-back Same
guarantee (Financial
Support Program
funded memberships
excluded)
Rambling River Center Room Rental Rates See Schedule G
Rambling River Center Damage Deposit Banquet Room $150.00 $300.00
Rambling River Center Damage Deposit Meeting Rooms $75.00 Same
3
Fitness Room Non-Member One-Time Visitor Pass $6.00 (includes tax) $7.00 (includes tax)
Rambling River Center Non-Member User Fee $3.00 (includes tax) $4.00 (includes tax)
Rambling River Center Newsletter Advertisement $90.00 (includes tax) Same
(2 inch x 1 inch ad space for one year)
Sound System Rental $150.00 (includes tax) Same
Park Facilities Rental Fees 2019 2020
Shelter Half-Day (7:00 a.m.-2:45 p.m. or 3:15-11:00 p.m.) $65.00 (includes tax) Same
Shelter Full-Day (7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.) $90.00 (includes tax) Same
Event Application Fee $60.00 (includes tax) Same
Events in Parks (150 or more people) $285.00 (includes tax) Same
(requires Insurance Certificate and separate fees for
portable toilet and garbage service)
Weddings $285.00 (includes tax) Same
Warming House Rental Rate
Private Skating Party $40.00 (includes tax) Same
(8:00 a.m. to Noon only with minimum two hour charge)
Outdoor Fields Rental Rates
Baseball fields See Schedule H
Soccer fields See Schedule H
4
SCHEDULE G
RAMBLING RIVER CENTER ROOM RENTAL RATES*
Room Name: 2019 2020
Banquet Room $330.00 includes four hour rental $350.00 includes four hour rental
(capacity 130 people and one hour for set up/clean up and one hour for set up/clean up
up includes use of time (5 hours total); use of up time (5 hours total); use of up
Kitchenette) to 12 round tables and 130 chairs; to 12 round tables and 130 chairs;
and a mandatory fee for cleaning and a mandatory fee for cleaning
after rental ends, which includes after rental ends, which includes
garbage removal and tear down of garbage removal and tear down of
the tables and chairs in the room. the tables and chairs in the room.
If cleaning takes more than two If cleaning takes more than two
hours, then any additional cleaning hours, then any additional cleaning
time beyond two hours will be billed time beyond two hours will be
at a rate of $55.00 per hour billed at a rate of $55.00 per ho
$85.00 for each additional hour $87.50 for each additional hour
rented beyond the original five hour rented beyond the original five
block hour block
Empire Room $80.00 for two hour time block Same
(capacity 57 people) $40.00 each additional hour Same
Two Small Conference Rooms $20.00 for two hour time block and Same
(capacity 15 people) $10.00 each additional hour Same
Harry and Louise Ross Room $65.00 for two hour time block and Same
(capacity 30 people) $32.50 for each additional hour Same
Garage $60 per stall or Same
$200 entire garage per day Same
Garage Set Up/Tear Down $70 per day Same
*Returning regularly scheduled renters receive first priority for rental of the room they rented in the previous
year.
5
SCHEDULE H
OUTDOOR FIELD USE FEE SCHEDULE
Non-Tournament Outdoor Field Use Charges:
2019 2020
$4.00 per registered participant (as of the first day of regular practice) Summer Outdoor Use Fee – Groups primarily
serving local youth under 18 years of age.
Calculated based on the number of registered
participants as of the first day of scheduled
practice
$14.00 per participant Same
Youth Groups not qualifying or choosing not to pay
the Seasonal Use Fee
$50.00 (includes tax) Same
Adult Groups
$5.00 (includes tax) Same
Tournaments Outdoor Field Use Charges:
Baseball and Softball Fields
(Fee includes use plus initial dragging, setting
of the base path and pitching, and painting of
foul and fence lines once each tournament)
$65 (includes tax) per field Same
per day (fee does not include
garbage fee)
Soccer Fields
(Full size soccer fields may be sub-divided into
small fields but are only charged per full size
field. Any portion of a full size field constitutes
use of that full size field.)
$65 (includes tax) per field Same
per day (fee does not include
garbage fee)
Other Services and Fees
Additional dragging baseball or softball fields $17 (includes tax) per field per Same
Dragging
Soccer field lining $55 (includes tax) per hour Same
for labor + tax
$30 (includes tax) per hour Same
for painting
Additional labor or materials requested by group At prevailing rates Same
Portable Toilets If use is requested by user group, Same
Then entire cost paid by user group.
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Agenda Items for Meeting with Empire Towns hip's P ark and R ecreation C ommis s ion
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
C ontact has been made with the c hair of the Empire Towns hip P ark and R ecreation C ommis s ion about a
joint meeting between the C ity of F armington and Empire Township's P ark and R ec reation C ommissions . A
joint meeting will be held on Monday, O c tober 28 at Empire Township's Town Hall building at 7:00 p.m.
As a res ult of the meeting being s et, the next s tep is to c reate an agenda. In the past, there has been an effort
to keep the meeting to an hour becaus e the Empire Towns hip P ark and R ecreation C ommis s ion has their
regular meeting after the meeting with the C ommission. S o with this one hour meeting time frame in
mind, C ommission members s hould c ome to the meeting with s ome ideas for agenda topic s it would like to
dis cus s with the Empire Towns hip P ark and R ecreation C ommis s ion. P ast agenda items have included:
provide park improvement project updates
provide trail project updates
provide new development updates containing parks and trails
rec program and event updates
music /entertainment in parks information s haring
O nce agenda topics have been identified through s ome brains torming, C ommission members can then
prioritize the items it would like to inc lude on the joint meeting agenda. T hen a draft agenda will be created
that inc udes the prioritized items the C ommis s ion would like to disc uss during the meeting. T he draft agenda
will then be shared with the Empire Towns hip P ark and R ecreation C ommis s ion and they will be able to add
items to the draft agenda that reflect what they would like to dis cus s with the F armington P ark and
R ecreation C ommis s ion.
After the Empire Township P ark and R ec reation C ommission has added its agenda items to the draft
meeting agenda, it will be shared with F armington P ark and R ecreation C ommis s ion members at the
S eptember 11, 2019 meeting, so the meeting agenda can be finalized at this meeting.
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Approve P arks and F acilities Tour with the C ity C ouncil
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
T he C ommission and C ity C ouncil will be jointly taking a tour of c ity parks and fac ilities on Wednes day,
August 14, 2019 s tarting at 6:00 p.m. T he city bus will be us ed to drive around to the different facilities and
parks during the tour. T he tour will start at the R ambling R iver C enter where the c ity bus is s tored.
Attached is a draft sc hedule the C ommis s ion had initially dis cus s ed at its May 8, 2019 meeting. C ommission
members should review the draft s chedule in order to make sure the s ites identified are s till appropriate for
the tour. As part of the tour, the new playground equipment in P rairie P ines P ark and Marigold P ark will
receive a ribbon cutting. T his will be the firs t time the C ity C ouncil has partic ipated in a playground ribbon
cutting with the C ommis s ion.
After C ommis s ion members have had an opportunity to dis cus s and make any revisions to the tour
s chedule, it should formally approve the sc hedule, s o it c an be shared with the C ity C ounc il and the public .
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Draft 2019 Parks and Facilities Tour Schedule
August 14, 2019 Parks and Facilities Tour
Schedule
Time Location Action
6:00-6:10 p.m. Rambling River
Center
Tour starts
walk through building and look at
various rooms
6:15-6:25 p.m. Evergreen Knoll
Park
Stop and look at former pool site as a
future community garden site
6:30-6:40 p.m. Prairie Pines Park Review park improvements and complete
ribbon cutting for new playground
6:45-6:50 p.m. Prairieview Park Look at park improvements completed in
2018
6:55-7:05 p.m. Marigold Park Review park improvements and complete
ribbon cutting for new playground
7:15-7:20 p.m. Farmington Preserve
Park (Westview Park
as backup location if
bb court is not done)
Look at basketball court resurfacing
project work
7:30-7:35 p.m. Flagstaff Meadow
Park
Look at new park location and trails
7:45-7:55 p.m. Schmitz-Maki Arena Stop and walk through building to look at
future improvements identified during
preliminary design work completed in
2018
8:00 p.m. Rambling River
Center
Tour ends
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Approve 2030 P ark Improvement F und F inanc ial P lan
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
A draft 2030 F inanc ial P lan (F inanc ial P lan) for the P ark Improvement F und was previously shared with
C ommis s ion members during the Marc h 13 and May 8, 2019 meetings. T he F inancial P lan identifies
pos s ible revenue sources and projected c onstruc tion c os ts for eac h year through 2030. T he final draft
F inancial P lan that was pres ented at the May 8 meeting was incorrec t and had to be revis ed in order to matc h
the 2020-2024 P ark Improvement F unds C apital Improvement P lan that the C ommis s ion approved at the
May 8, 2019 meeting. Included in the meeting packet is the revised final draft of the F inancial P lan.
As reminder, the F inancial P lan is based on a 20 year replacement s chedule for eac h park. T his means once
every 20 years, the park would rec eive funding to make improvements to the park. As you c an s ee in the
financial plan, c ertain improvements are identified to be completed. It is important to note that playground
equipment is on a 20 year replac ement plan, s o when the park is sc heduled for funding, the replac ement of
playground equipment is one of the items s hown to occ ur. T his does not however mean that all of the
playground equipment will need to be replaced. W hat it means is that the current playground equipment will
be assessed and then determined if it is appropriate to be replaced. S helters are on a 40-50 year replacement
s chedule, so that is why you do not s ee funding to replace s helters . S helter replacement will not be needed
until at leas t the year 2043.
T he C ommission is being asked to review the final draft of the F inanc ial P lan prior to the meeting. During
the meeting C ommission members are encouraged to as k questions of staff and provide further input and
feedback on the plan. If there are revisions identified, it will be inc orporated into the final version of the
F inancial P lan. O nce the C ommission is comfortable with the final version of the F inanc ial P lan, then the
C ommis s ion is asked to formally approve it.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Final Draft Park Improvement Fund's 2030 Financial Plan
2019-2030 Park Improvement Fund Financial Plan
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Projected Fund Balance Beginning of Year 454,859 292,582 361,827 462,730 451,133 414,693 239,693 34,693 (865,307)(1,340,307)(1,975,307)(1,950,307)
Projected Additional Revenue Liquor Store Transfer 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 900,000
Estimated Combined Park Dedication and Park Development
Fees 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 300,000
Jim Bell Park & Preserve & Sapphire Lake Farm Lease 7,723 8,245 8,403 8,403 8,560 41,334
GO Bond
Other i.e. general fund transfer, local government aid
Improvement Projects by Park:
Dakota County Estates Park
2027 Projects List: Replace existing playground equipment for 5-12 year
old children and install new playground equipment for 2-5 year old children
($100,000), basketball court surface work ($10,000) and replace ballfield
backstop ($40,000)
150,000 150,000
Daisy Knoll Park
2027 Projects List: Replace existing playground equipment for 5-12 year
old children, install new playground equipment for 2-5 year old children
($100,000), replace basketball court ($30,000), replace backstop
($40,000), additional new paved trails ($100,000), and complete prairie
restoration work ($30,000)
300,000 300,000
Depot Way Arts Park:
2026 Projects List: Replace concrete sidewalk from middle of park to
southern boundary ($50,000) install new sculptures ($25,000), replace
lighting $50,000) and additional new trail/sidewalk connections north and
south of the park ($75,000)
200,000 200,000
Evergreen Knoll Park
2026 Projects List: Construct a new shelter ($40,000), replace
playground equipment for 2-5 and 5-12 year old children ($125,000), bb
court surface work ($10,000), parking lot reconstruct ($150,000)
325,000 325,000
Fair Hills Park:
Improvements next scheduled in 2034
Farmington Preserve Park
2019 Project List: basketball court surface improvements ($5,000) 2028
Projects List: basketball court surface improvements ($10,000) replace
replace playground equipment for 5-12 year old children ($75,000), install
new playgorund equipment for 2-5 year old children ($25,000), replace
paved trail ($50,000) and replace ballfield backstop ($40,000)
5,000 200,000 205,000
Flagstaff Meadow Park
2023 Project List: develop approved park master plan ($7,500)
2024 Projects List: install new separate playground equipment and
concrete border for 2-5 year old and 5-12 year old children ($90,000) and
install new shelter ($35,000)
7,500 100,000 107,500
2019-2030 Park Improvement Fund Financial Plan
Hill Dee Park
2028 Projects List: replace spearate playground equipment structures
that serve 2-5 year old and 5-12 year old children ($100,000) , basketball
court surface improvement ($10,000), replace paved trail ($25,000)
135,000 135,000
Hillview Park
Undeveloped park and no improvements planned until land is developed
adjacent to exisitng park when additional park land will be acquired
through the park dedication process
Jim Bell Park and Preserve 2024
Projects List: Grading and site work for community park including turf
seeding, street access and parking lot ($250,000)
2026 Projects List: Replace existing separate playground equipment for
2-5 and 5-12 year old children ($100,000), basketball court surface
improvement ($10,000), replace paved trails ($100,000) and install new
trail connections ($40,000)
250,000 250,000
Lake Julia Park
Improvements next scheduled in 2031
Marigold Park
2019 Projects List: 2019 improvements include: playground equipment
($25,000), park shelter ($25,000), turf/landscaping/trees ($15,000) and
site amenities i.e. grills, waste containers, benches, picnic tables, bike
rack ($5,000)
70,000 70,000
Meadowview Park
2023 Projects List: Replace existing playground equipment for 5-12 year
old children and add playground equipment for 2-5 year old children
($100,000) and replace sections of boardwalk ($25,000)
100,000 100,000
Middle Creek Park Park
improvements will not occur until additional land is acquired adjacent to
Eastview Avenue because this is where almost all park facilities and
amenities are located in the park per the approved park master plan
North Creek Park
2028 Projects List: New building to include a warming house area and
shelter to be constructed, install a fishing dock, install a climbing boulder,
replace existing playground equipment for 5-12 year old children and
install new playground equipment for 2-5 year old children
400,000 400,000
Pine Knoll Park
2023 Project List: half court basketball court surface improvements
Other Improvements next scheduled in 2033
5,000 5,000
Prairie Pines Park 2019
Projects List: install new playground equipment ($75,000), 5 foot wide
sidewalk ($50,000), install shelter ($35,000), construct basketball court
($25,000), and site amenities i.e. benches, picnic tables, grills, waste
containers and bike rack ($10,000)
195,000 195,000
2019-2030 Park Improvement Fund Financial Plan
Prairieview Park
Improvements next scheduled in 2037
Prairie Waterway
2019 Project List: replace existing asphalt shelter roof with new metal
shelter roof
3,000 3,000
Rambling River Park
2020 Project List: replace backstop on Feely Fields Field #1
2021 Project List: Reconstruct Feely Fields parking lot as part of the
Spruce street projcet
2022Project List: Replace outfield fence Feely Fields Field #2
2023 Project List: Replace backstop on Feely Fields Field #2
2024 Project List: Replace outfield fence Feely Fields Field #3
2025 Project List: Repalce paved trails ($150,000) and replace backstop
on Feely Fields Field #3 ($45,000)
2029 Projects List: Replace the existing ship playground structure with
new 2-5 year old play structure ($75,000)
30,000 20,000 40,000 25,000 195,000 75,000 310,000
Silver Springs Park
2026 Projects List: Replace concrete playground border and separate
playground equipment for 2-5 year old and 5-12 year old children
($110,000)
100,000 100,000
Tamarack Park
2025 Projects List: replace existing playground equipment for 2-5 year
old and 5-12 year old children ($100,000) and basketball court surface
improvements ($10,000)
110,000 110,000
Troy Hill Park
Improvements next scheduled in 2036
Vermillion Grove Park
2026 Projects List: replace current playground equipment with new
playground equipment for 2-5 and 5-12 year old children ($100,000),
replace sections of boardwalk ($25,000)
125,000 125,000
Vermillion River Crossing Town Square
Undeveloped until build out of development
Westview Park
2020 Project List: basketball court surface improvements
2027 Projects List: replace current playground equipment with new
playground equipment for 2-5 and 5-12 year old children ($100,000) and
replace paved trail ($25,000)
6,000 125,000 131,000
TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES 270,000 39,000 7,500 120,000 145,000 275,000 305,000 1,000,000 575,000 735,000 75,000 0 2,971,500
Projected Fund Balance at End of Year 292,582 361,827 462,730 451,133 414,693 239,693 34,693 (865,307)(1,340,307)(1,975,307)(1,950,307)(1,850,307)
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:R eview 2019 Work P lan
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
Attached is an updated 2019 Work P lan. Items that have been c ompleted in the work plan s inc e the May 8
meeting are s hown in bold red. Items that were completed prior to the May 8 meeting are shown in bold
black. Items not s hown in bold blac k or bold red are not c ompleted. C ommission members are asked to
review the updated 2019 Work P lan and be prepared to disc uss it during the meeting to make sure it
acc urately reflects what has been c ompleted thus far.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Updated 2019 Work Plan
FARMINGTON PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
2019 WORK PLAN
Goal #1: Provide to the City Council a recommended 2020-2024 capital improvement plan for
the park improvement fund.
Objectives:
1. By April 1, the Commission will have discussed and identified a preliminary list of five year
capital improvement projects for the park improvement fund that will include a list of parks,
costs and schedule to be completed in the years 2020 to 2024.
Status: Completed. Discussion occurred during the March 13 meeting.
2. By June 1, the Commission will finalize the five year capital improvement projects for the years
2020-2024 and make a recommendation to the City Council for approval.
Status: Completed. Final five year parks capital improvement projects were finalized and a
recommendation was made at the May 8 meeting to have the City Council approve it.
3. By September 15, the projects recommended for funding from 2020-2024 will be included in
the City Council approved 2020 preliminary budget.
Goal #2: Participate in the process of making playground and shelter improvements in Marigold
Park.
Objectives:
1. By January 11, the Commission will have given input on the playground equipment and shelter
designs to be completed and incorporated into the Request for Proposal.
Status: Completed. Input was given during the December 10, 2018 meeting.
2. By March 1, the Commission will have reviewed and approved from the proposals submitted a
vendor to purchase and install the playground equipment, and picnic shelter and will make a
recommendation to the City Council to approve the vendor selected.
Status: Completed. Action was taken at the February 13, 2019 meeting.
3. By April 1, the City Council will have approved the purchase and installation of the new
playground equipment and shelter.
Status: Completed. City Council approved the purchase and installation at its March 4, 2019
meeting.
4. By September 30, installation of the new playground equipment and shelter will have been
completed.
Status: Partially completed. Playground equipment has been installed, but not the shelter
yet.
5. By October 31, 2018 a ribbon cutting will have been completed for the new playground
equipment and shelter.
Goal #3 Participate in the process of making playground and shelter improvements in Prairie
Pines Park.
Objectives:
1. By January 11, the Commission will have given input on the playground equipment and shelter
designs to be completed and incorporated into the Request for Proposal.
Status: Completed. Input was given during the December 10, 2018 meeting.
2. By March 1, the Commission will have reviewed and approved from the proposals submitted a
vendor to purchase and install the playground equipment, and picnic shelter and will make a
recommendation to the City Council to approve the vendor selected.
Status: Completed. Action was taken at the February 13, 2019 meeting.
3. By April 1, the City Council will have approved the purchase and installation of the new
playground equipment and shelter.
Status: Completed. The City Council approved the purchase and installation at its March 4,
2019 meeting.
4. By September 30, installation of the new playground equipment and shelter will have been
completed.
Status: Partially completed. The new playground equipment has been installed, but not the
shelter yet.
5. By October 31, 2018 a ribbon cutting will have been completed for the new playground
equipment and shelter.
Goal #4: Receive periodic presentations from each of the Parks and Recreation professional
staff members about programs, parks, facilities and trails.
Objectives:
1. By March 15, the Commission will have received a presentation by professional staff members
of the Department’s 2018 Annual Report.
Status: Completed. Park and Recreation Department staff members presented the 2018
annual report at the March 13, 2019 meeting.
2. By May 1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the results of
the Schmitz-Maki Arena’s winter ice season.
Status: Will be completed during the July 10 meeting.
3. By August 1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the first half
operations of the Rambling River Center.
4. By October 1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff on the results
of the summer programs offered.
5. By November 1, Commission members will have received a presentation from staff about the
spring turf season and summer ice season.
6. By November 1, the Commission will have received a presentation from staff about
maintenance and improvements to parks and trails
Goal #5: Continue to build and strengthen relationships with Empire Township’s Park and
Recreation Commission (ETPRC).
Objectives:
1. By April 1, discuss and determine a date to have a joint meeting with ETPRC.
Status: Completed. October 28 was identified as a possible meeting date.
2. By June 1, a date will have been set to have a joint meeting with ETPRC.
Status: Completed. October 28 meeting date was approved by the ETPRC, so joint meeting
will be held on this date.
3. By August 1, discuss and formulate a list of discussion topics for a joint meeting agenda with
ETPRC and have both groups agree to the meeting topics.
4. By December 1, a meeting will have been held with ETPRC.
Goal #6: Participate in the development of an approved city Bike Pedestrian Plan.
Objectives:
1. By January 31, a report by Commission representative on the Bike Pedestrian Plan Committee
will provide an update to the Commission.
Status: Completed. Update was provided by staff at the January 9, 2019 meeting.
2. By March 15, a report by Commission representative on the Bike Pedestrian Plan Committee
will provide an update to the Commission.
Status: Completed. Update was provided by Suchanek at the February 13, 2019 meeting.
3. By March 31, Commission members will have been involved in the public input process by
either attending the Community Expo, one of the open houses or participated in the survey
monkey or social pinpoint exercises to give input on the Bike Pedestrian Plan
Status: Completed. Commission members participated in the survey monkey questionnaire.
4. By May 15, a report by Commission representative on the Bike Pedestrian Plan Committee will
provide an update to the Commission.
Status: Completed. Updates about the plan were provided at the February, March and May
meetings.
5. By June 30, Commission will review the draft Bike Pedestrian Plan, give further input on the
draft plan and then forward a recommendation to the City Council to adopt the plan.
Status: Completed. Members attended a draft plan presentation to the City Council, Park and
Recreation Commission and Planning Commission on May 20, where an opportunity was
provided to give further input and feedback by those in attendance at the meeting.
Goal #7: Have a parks and facilities tour with the City Council.
Objectives:
1. By April 1, the Commission will have identified a possible date to have a parks and facilities
tour with the City Council.
Status: Completed. At the March 13 meeting, a date of August 14 was forwarded to the City
Council for a parks and facilities tour.
2. By July1, the Commission will have determined at tour date, which parks and facilities to tour
and a tour schedule.
Status: Will be completed during the July 10 meeting.
3. By August 1, the Commission will determine what it wishes to discuss with the City Council
during the parks and facilities tour.
Status: Will be completed during the July 10 meeting.
4. By September 15, the Commission will have toured parks, trails and recreational facilities with
the City Council.
Goal #8: Work with staff to develop a Parks and Events Passport Program (Program)
Objectives:
1. By February 1, will have received a presentation from staff about the Program.
Status: Completed. Presentation was given by Recreation Supervisor Ryan Hayes at the
January 9, 2019 meeting.
2. By March 15, will have provided feedback/input on the Program.
Status: Completed. Feedback was given by Commission members during the presentation
that occurred at the January 9, 2019 meeting.
3. By July 30, will have received a progress report from staff about participation in the Program.
Status: Will be completed during the July 10 meeting.
4. By October 31, will have received a second progress report from staff about participation in
the Program.
5. By December 31, will have given feedback/input to staff on any refinements to the program and
continuation of the program.
Goal #9: Meet at least once with the Rambling River Center Advisory Board.
Objectives:
1. By April 1, the Commission and Advisory Board will have identified a date to have a meeting.
Status: Completed. A date of May 8 was approved to meet with the Advisory Board.
2. By May 1, an agenda for the meeting will have been reviewed and approved by the Commission
and Advisory Board.
Status: Completed. Both the Commission and Advisory Board discuss possible agenda items
prior to the joint meeting.
3. By December 31, the Commission and Advisory Board will have met at least one time.
Status: Completed. A meeting was held on May 8.
Goal #10: Name the park in the Sapphire Lake development through a public park naming
contest.
Objectives:
1. By February 15 a decision will be made about what process will be used to name the park in
the Sapphire Lake Development.
Status: The naming of the park has been tabled until the development’s final phase is built
out, which is not expected to occur until 3-4 years at which time some of the park land will
become accessible.
2. By April 15, the process to collect park names will have been completed.
Status: See #1 above.
3. By June 15, a name for the park will have been selected and recommended to the City Council
for approval.
Status: See #1 above.
4. By August 15, the city council will have approved a park name.
Status: See #1 above.
Goal #11: Complete a review of the city’s Park and Recreation Commission Ordinance
(Ordinance) to determine if any amendment(s) should be made to the Ordinance.
Objectives:
1. By February 15, a review of the Ordinance will have occurred.
Status: Completed. A review of the Ordinance occurred at the January 9, 2019 meeting.
2. By April 15, a decision will be made about recommending any Ordinance amendment(s) to the
city council.
Status: Completed. At the March 13 meeting the Commission determined it would be better
to create by-laws that could address a number of items without having to revise the city’s
ordinance. The creation of the by-laws will be included as a goal in the 2020 work plan.
3. By July 15, and if a recommendation is made to revise the ordinance, the city council will have
received and made a decision about any recommended amendment(s) to the ordinance.
Status: No longer applicable. No revisions were suggested in the ordinance.
4. By August 15, and if the city council approves amending the Ordinance, the amended
Ordinance will have been published in the city’s official publication, so the amendment(s) to
the Ordinance have satisfied all legal requirements.
Status: No longer applicable. No revisions were suggested in the ordinance.
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Adopted F armington Bike P edes trian P lan
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
T he C ity of F armington's Bike P edestrian P lan (P lan) was adopted by the C ity C ouncil at its June 17, 2019
meeting. A c opy of the adopted P lan has been provided to Dakota C ounty to s atisfy the requirement
identified in the grant funding agreement to complete the P lan on or before June 30, 2019. T he c ity has
received S tatewide Health Improvement P artnership (S HI P ) funding reimbursement payments from Dakota
C ounty in the total amount of $32,000, whic h was the c os t to hire the c onsulting firm of HKG I to work with
the c ity to c reate the final adopted P lan.
T he adopted P lan has been attac hed for C ommission members to read and review. It is a rather large
document, s o it will take s ome time to read through it prior to the meeting.
As the city moves forward and begins to implement the P lan, the C ommission is likely going to be the P lan
s tewards including making rec ommendations for future ac tion steps to be taken.
T he ac tion reques ted of the C ommis s ion is to read/review the P lan prior to the meeting and then dis cus s the
P lan during the meeting including asking ques tions and providing feedbac k on it.
AT TAC HMENT S :
Type Des cription
Backup Material Final City Council Adopted Farmington Bike Pedestrian Plan
FARMINGTON BIKE + PED PLAN
June 17, 2019
ii
Prepared by:
Funding provided
by:
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
Project Manager:
Randy Distad, CPRP
Farmington Parks and Recreation Director
City of Farmington
430 Third St.
Farmington, MN 55024
Phone: 651-280-6851
Email: rdistad@farmingtonmn.gov
Acknowledgements:
The City of Farmington
Dakota County Public Health Department
Minnesota Department of Health
Members of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Committee:
Dan Miller, Randy Distad, Laurie Suchanek,
Amy Morgan, Krista Tesky, Phil Windschitl,
Kate Matusinec, Kyle Anderson, Tony
Wippler, Ryan Hayes, Gary Rutherford,
Pennie Page
This plan was adopted by the City of Farmington on June 17, 2019.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
01 INTRODUCTION 1-1
Plan and Project Purpose 1-2
Why Plan for Biking and Walking Today? 1-2
Plan Objectives 1-4
Plan Funding 1-5
Project Timeline 1-7
02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-1
Farmington in Context 2-2
Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics 2-4
Relevant Plan Review 2-8
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network 2-14
Level of Traffic Stress Analysis 2-16
Community Engagement Phase 1 2-25
Community Engagement Phase 2 2-28
03 NETwORk PlAN 3-1
System Goals 3-2
Draft Network Plan 3-2
Network Plan Elements 3-4
Intersection Treatments 3-9
System Recommendations 3-11
04 IMPlEMENTATION 4-1
Implementation Plan 4-2
Implementation Recommendations 4-2
Phasing Strategy 4-4
Operations + Maintenance 4-12
Funding Strategies 4-13
TABLE OF
Contents
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
ik
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
iii
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1-2 Plan and Project Purpose
1-2 Why Plan for Biking and Walking Today?
1-4 Plan Objectives
1-5 Plan Funding
1-7 Project Timeline
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-1 introduction
1-2
Plan and Project Purpose
the following serve as the purpose of the Farmington Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan.
»to addresses the future of a city-wide bicycle and pedestrian
network, building off of the existing network.
»to incorporate community feedback and community desires
towards bicycle and pedestrian goals and while being balanced
with city staff recommendations and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
committee feedback.
»to identify best practices and guide the city in future facility and
network investments.
»to guide policy and programming improvements, such as
wayfinding, bike parking and educational/encouragement
activities.
why Plan for Biking and walking Today?
over time, the purposes for biking and walking have changed
dramatically. Walking is the original form of transportation. it has
always been the cheapest and most environmentally friendly way of
getting around. the introduction of the bicycle in the early 1800’s
carried many of the same benefits and allowed people to travel
more efficiently, faster, and longer distances. after the advent of
the personal automobile and its increased popularity in the 1920s
and 30s, biking and walking for transportation purposes began
to decline and was seen mostly for sport, exercise, or recreational
purposes.
today, biking and walking is again become more popular for
multiple purposes as many people are recognizing the importance
of living an active and healthy lifestyle. the following are some
key reasons for planning for the future bicyclists and pedestrians in
Farmington.
»Safety: evidence suggests that high-bicycling-mode-share cities
are not only safer for bicyclists but for all road users. Further,
bike facilities themselves act as “calming” mechanisms on traffic,
slowing cars and reducing fatalities1.
»Livability + Mobility: Fifty percent of u.s. residents say that
walkability is a top priority or high priority when considering
where to live2. Bicycling has become the country’s fastest-growing
form of transportation for commuters.
1 University of Colorado Denver. (2019, May 29). Cycling lanes reduce fatalities for all
road users, study shows: Roads are safer for motorists, pedestrians and cyclists in cities with
robust bike facilities. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 31, 2019 from www.sciencedaily.com/
releases/2019/05/190529113036.htm
2 Urban Land Institute: America in 2015: A ULI Survey of Views on Housing, Transportation,
and Community. Washington, D.C.: the Urban Land Institute, 2015.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-3 introduction
»Health: the cost of obesity in minnesota is $3.2 billion per
year3. improving streetscapes and biking and walking facilities
ensures that all community members can walk and bike safely and
conveniently throughout the day.
»Household and Community Prosperity: according to aaa, it
costs an average of $8,849 to operate the average car for 2018,
or about $737 per month4. not all households can afford to
own a car and some lower income households who do own a
car because they feel that is the only way to get around may be
sacrificing other basic needs in order to get by.
»Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: the transportation
sector generates the largest share (28.9%) of greenhouse gas
emissions5. Walking or cycling could realistically substitute for
41% of short car trips (less than 3 miles), saving nearly 5% of
co2e emissions from car travel6.
»Recreation: trails and greenways provide facilities for
recreational purposes. trails provide a unique facility to serve
a diverse population of a community that may otherwise have
limited opportunities to access natural areas due to financial or
transportation constraints.
»Parking and Transportation Networks: as more people bike
and walk to destinations such as retail, restaurants, entertainment,
and work, the demand for vehicle parking decreases, allowing
buildings to be closer to each other and become even more
walkable. encouraging active transportation and bringing travel
origins and destinations closer together can help alleviate traffic
congestion7.
»Regional Economic Competitiveness / Tourism: as bicycling
and walking networks have grown, so have active transportation–
oriented developments and bike-friendly businesses. numerous
studies have shown that real estate values increase with proximity
to bicycle paths and walking trails. Bike lanes also help companies
score talented workers8.
»Sustainability / Resilience: Because biking and walking doesn’t
3 Trogdon JG, Finkelstein EA, Feagan CW, Cohen JW. State‐and Payer‐Specific Estimates
of Annual Medical Expenditures Attributable to Obesity. Obesity. 2012; 20(1):214-20 [Figure
adjusted for inflation using 2017 dollars]
4 Your Driving Costs: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? [Brochure]. (2018 Edition)
Heathrow, FL: AAA Association Communication
5 U.S. EPA’s Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017. https://
www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks
6 Neves, A., & Brand, C. (2018, August 31). Assessing the potential for carbon emissions
savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel
diary approach. Retrieved May 31, 2019, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0965856417316117
7 Wen, Liang; Kenworthy, Jeff; Guo, Xiumei; Marinova, Dora. 2019. “Solving Traffic
Congestion through Street Renaissance: A Perspective from Dense Asian Cities.” Urban Sci. 3,
no. 1: 18.
8 “Protected Bike Lanes Mean Business,” by PeopleforBikes and the Alliance for Biking &
Walking
The amount of space 69 people occupy on bike,
on-foot, and in 60 cars. Source: Cycling Promotion
Fund
1-4
rely on burning fossil fuels they are more resilient to swings in
fuel prices and are far cheaper to repair. From a sustainability
perspective, bicycles can be produced for a fraction of the
materials, energy, and shipping costs of a car. Biking and walk
also saves taxpayers money by reducing road wear. a 20-pound
bicycle causes less wear on the pavement than a two-ton vehicle.
Plan Objectives
the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan focuses on a variety
of objectives to holistically address bicycle and pedestrian
issues. objectives focus on physical infrastructure improvements,
programmatic solutions, and policy-driven decisions. the following
13 objectives, broken down into five categories help guide the
direction of the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.
Facilities / Infrastructure
»Fill network gaps, address problem intersections and barriers
»Find ways to make biking and walking safe, convenient, and easy
»define trail, sidewalk, and facility standards that are reasonable,
enforceable, and sustainable for the city of Farmington
Address a Variety of Users
»define a cohesive, connected walking and biking network in
Farmington that meets the needs of:
-Commuters
-Recreational bicyclists, hikers
-People with disabilities
-People who don’t have the ability or interest in driving
-People who use public transportation
-Children, young people
-Seniors
Make Connections
»Better connect residents and visitors of Farmington to:
-Parks
-Schools
-Community Destinations
-Employment Centers
-Commercial Centers + Businesses
-Neighborhoods
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-5 introduction
Encourage / Educate
»identify programs and initiatives to support walking and biking in
Farmington.
»Promote active living
»identify ways to make biking, walking, and other passive forms of
exercise part of daily routines
Prioritize and Implement
»define community goals and a vision for the future of walking and
biking in Farmington
»recommend strategies for phasing and implementation of the
Plan
»identify ‘champions’ or stewards for recommendations that can’t
be addressed by the city alone
»design the plan and plan process to assist with future fund-raising
or grant-writing
»identify priority projects, projects that can be started right away
Plan Funding
to create this plan, the city received grant funding from the dakota
county Health department through funding it receives from the
statewide Health improvement Partnership (sHiP) grant program
from the minnesota department of Health.
the city of Farmington and dakota county have a history of
working collaboratively on the design and construction of trails and
sidewalks within dakota county rights-of-way. in the last ten years,
the city and the county have worked together to develop approved
regional greenway master plans that will eventually connect the city
to the county’s regional park and trail system. also as a result of the
collaboration, 13 miles of trail, or approximately 30% of the exiting
trail system in Farmington is within dakota county rights-of-way.
sHiP supports community-driven solutions to expand opportunities
for active living, healthy eating and commercial tobacco-free living.
minnesota communities are working with sHiP to promote active
transportation to provide safe and convenient opportunities for
physical activity.
active transportation can be encouraged through:
»sidewalks, walking paths and bike facilities
»safe and convenient pedestrian street crossing features such
as crosswalks, stop signs, stop lights and other street crossing
elements
»motorist traffic calming and speed-reduction measures
1-6
TASK NOV ‘18 DEC JAN ‘19 FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE
1: Organize the Effort
1.1 Kick off meeting + system tour
1.2 Develop project outreach materials
1.3 Develop Community Engagement Plan
1.4 Develop and launch community survey
1.5 Stakeholder Listening Sessions
2: Inventory and Analysis
2.1 Assemble Background Data
2.2 Review Relevant Plans
2.3 Perform System Analysis
2.4 City Staff Meeting: Go-To Meeting
2.5 BPP Committee Meeting #1
2.6 Community Open House #1
2.7 Process community feedback
2.8 Prepare Existing Conditions Report
3: Plan and System Recommendations
3.1 Develop Draft Plan Framework
3.2 Develop System Plan +
Recommendations
3.3 Staff Workshop
3.4 BPP Committee #2
3.5 City Staff Meeting: Go-To Meeting
3.6 Community Open House#2
3.7 Develop and launch community survey
4: Final Plan + Deliverables
4.1 Revision of Draft Plan
4.2 Final Draft Document + Action Plan
4.3 BPP Committee #3
4.4 City Staff Meeting
4.5 Council, Planning and Parks
Commission Joint Workshop
4.6 City Council Final Presentation +
Approval
4.7 Final Document deliverables
Meeting Key
City Staff Meeting (5 total) Community Survey (2 total)
BPP Committee Meeting (3 total)City Council/Commission Meeting (3-4 total)
Community Open House (2 total)
End date: Feb. 1st
Revised 3/19/19Farmington Bike + Ped PlanFigure 1.1 Project Timeline
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1-7 introduction
»street landscaping and pedestrian-level street lighting
»Bike racks, lockers, or other bike parking and storage facilities
»land use development patterns to locate homes, work sites,
schools, stores and other community services and amenities
within reasonable walking distances (pedestrian-oriented
development) and within easy access to transit (transit-oriented
development)
»signage that helps pedestrians and bicyclists navigate to their
destinations.
Project Timeline
the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian plan was completed over an
eight-month period (see Figure 1.1) from its kick-off in november
2018 to its completion in June 2019. initial engagement efforts
began in december 2018 and lasted until February 2019. after the
preparation of the existing conditions report and the development
of draft plan and recommendations, a second round of engagement
took place from april 2019 to may 2019. the final draft of the Plan
was completed and approved on June 17, 2019.
Photo Credit: Jenny Olmanson
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
2-1 existing conditions
CHAPTER 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
2-2 Farmington in Context
2-4 Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics
2-8 Relevant Plan Review
2-14 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network
2-16 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis
2-25 Community Engagement Phase 1
2-28 Community Engagement Phase 2
Farmington
Minneapolis
Saint Paul
Afton
Apple Valley
Arden
Hills
Bayport
Birchwood Village
Blaine
Bloomington
Brooklyn
Center
Brooklyn Park
Burnsville
Carver
Chanhassen
Chaska
Circle Pines
Coates
Columbia Heights
Coon
Rapids
Corcoran
Cottage Grove
Crystal
Deephaven
Dellwood
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Edina
Elko New
Market
Excelsior
Falcon
Heights
Fridley
Gem
Lake
Golden Valley
Grant
Greenwood
Hampton
Hastings
Hilltop
Hopkins
Hugo
Inver Grove
Heights
Lake Elmo
Lakeland
Lakeville
Landfall
Lauderdale
Lexington
Lilydale
Lino Lakes
Little
Canada
Long Lake
Mahtomedi
Maple Grove
MaplewoodMedicine
Lake
Medina
Mendota
Mendota
Heights
Miesville
Minnetonka
Minnetonka Beach
Mounds
View
New
Brighton
New
Hope
New
Prague
New Trier
Newport
North Oaks
North
Saint
Paul
Oak Park
Heights
Oakdale
Orono
Osseo
Pine
Springs
Plymouth
Prior Lake
Richfield
Robbinsdale
Rosemount
Roseville
Saint
Anthony
Saint
Louis
Park
Saint
Paul
Park
Savage
Shakopee
Shoreview
Shorewood
South
Saint
Paul
Spring
Lake Park
Stillwater
Sunfish
Lake
Tonka
Bay
Vadnais
Heights
Vermillion
Wayzata
West
Saint
Paul
White
Bear
Lake
Willernie
Woodbury
Woodland
Figure 2.1 Farmington in the Regional Context
35E
35
94
694
494
35W
52
10169
36
55
3
42
64
50
31
Farmington in Context
Development Context
the development of Farmington occurred originally because of the
railroad system. the original town site, today’s downtown area, was
established at the intersection of two small rail lines - the minnesota
central and the Hastings & dakota - that ultimately became part of
the chicago, milwaukee and st. Paul railroad. the town’s business
district grew up adjacent to the milwaukee road depot. until the
1990s, Farmington’s commerce and industry was focused upon
agricultural production.
an area of lakeville township was annexed into Farmington in
1971. this major annexation immediately created a large gap of
undeveloped land between the original town of Farmington south of
the Vermillion river and this new residential area to the north.
2-2
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
With Farmington’s location on the edge of the twin cities metro area
(as seen in Figure 2.1), it experienced an unprecedented growth rate
during the mid 1990s. new housing developments were primarily
constructed in the city’s northern portion closer to lakeville than the
original town of Farmington. these new developments consisted
of typical suburban subdivisions of single-family homes laid out on
curvilinear streets. this growth intensified the disconnection and
development contrast between the northern and southern portions
of the city. as a result, Farmington as a whole is often perceived to
have two separate areas within the community, one north and one
south.
Because the original development of Farmington occurred due
to the railroad system rather than the interstate Highway system,
Farmington’s downtown and surrounding residential neighborhoods
consist of small, walkable, human-scale blocks with sidewalks.
immediately adjacent to the original location of Farmington is a
newer residential development that duplicates the small-block
roadway pattern. the curvilinear and disconnected street pattern
of much of the newer development of the 1970s and afterward
presents more difficulties for walking and biking because of the
circuitous and indirect routes they create with gaps in the sidewalk
and trail network.
Existing Funding Sources
the capital improvement projects in parks and trails have been
funded over the years through two funding sources. the first
funding source has been through funds received from residential,
commercial and industrial development. these funds were received
as cash in lieu of land through the park dedication process. the
second source of funding has been through the city’s municipal
liquor store profit transfers.
the city implemented an annual pavement management program
for trail maintenance in 2012. the pavement management program
provides annual funding for crack sealing and fog sealing trails. the
city is broken into five areas, which results in every trail in the city
receiving maintenance work at least once every five years.
While there is annual funding in place for pavement management
of trails, there is currently inadequate funding for replacement of
trail sections that have so badly deteriorated that crack sealing and
fog sealing hold no benefit. this is due to parts of the trail system
being initially constructed more than 30 years ago. as a result, if
the city wishes to continue to have a usable, safe and connected
trail system, then a long term funding plan and source should be
explored to be implemented in order to provide the funds needed
to replace the city’s existing trail infrastructure over time.
in 2017, a trail wayfinding signage program was initiated. three
different park and open space areas were identified that contained
highly used trail loops. the wayfinding signage program was funded
by the municipal Farmington liquor store operational profits.
2-3 existing conditions
Table 2.1 Bike/Walk Mode Share Over
Time
ModE 2000 2010 2016
Bicycle 0.0%0.2%0.6%
Walk 1.3%0.7%0.6%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Multiple Years
73
75
81
336
536
1,001
10,051
Walk
Bicycle
Other
Public Transportation
Work at Home
Carpooled
Drove Alone
Figure 2.2 Means of Transportation to Work
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Existing Travel Behavior and Characteristics
data available through the us census Bureau and the metropolitan
council help paint a picture of how Farmington residents are
currently getting around the city and to other destinations. analyzing
data that signifies a greater potential for walking and biking, such as
zero-car households or households in poverty, also helps Farmington
understand how much demand may exist for better walking and
biking facilities.
Bike and walk Mode Share
Because trips to work make up a large majority of daily
transportation, analyzing how residents get to work provides a good
snapshot of typical mode share in Farmington. mode share is the
percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation.
Figure 2.2 highlights how Farmington residents get to work most
days of the year. in most american cities, especially suburban
cities, many residents drive to work alone. an estimated 83% of
Farmington residents drive to work compared to 76% of all us
citizens. approximately 75 people bike to work in Farmington and
an estimated 73 people walk to work. non-motorized transportation
accounts for 1.5% total in Farmington. of note, the us census does
not account for partial trips so if a resident decides to bike to the
nearest transit stop and take the bus to work, that trip will likely be
counted as a transit trip if the transit portion of the trip is longer
in length. one significant fact to note about travel is that every
person, regardless of the main travel mode, is a pedestrian at one
point in time whether it’s walking (or rolling) from their car to their
work entrance, walking to the transit stop, or walking to a neighbors
house to carpool to work.
as seen in table 2.1, walking and biking as a means of getting to
work has shifted over time in Farmington. generally, the amount of
people biking to work has seen an upward trend since 2000. the
percent of people in Farmington walking to work has declined since
2000. Both of these trends aren’t necessarily unique to Farmington;
2-4
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
1,290
10,863
Co
m
m
u
t
e
Le
s
s
T
h
a
n
1
0
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
Co
m
m
u
t
e
Mo
r
e
T
h
a
n
10
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
Figure 2.3 Travel Time to Work
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
12,801
1,278
5,003Workers Employed
in City
Workers Living and
Employed in City
Workers Living in
City
Figure 2.4 Employment Inflow and Outflow in Farmington
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination
Employment Statistics 2015
TRAVEl DISTANCE IN FARMINGTON
Source: HKGi, Metropolitan Council Travel
Behavior Inventory 2010 Household Interview
Survey
most us cities are seeing an increase in bike mode share as
bicycling becomes a more attractive, acceptable, and safer mode of
transportation.
Travel Distance and Destination
one of the largest determinants of how someone gets to their
destination is the distance needed to travel. When a person is less
than three miles from their destination, the chances of biking to their
destination are more likely. similarly when a person is less than a half
mile away from their destination, they are more likely to walk. even if
individuals don’t choose to bike or walk to their destination, chances
are that they are far more likely to consider it as an option if the
distance needed to travel is short, especially when quality bike and
walking facilities are present.
according to a sample of individuals surveyed in the metropolitan
council’s 2010 travel Behavior inventory, half of all trips in
Farmington are six miles or less. nearly 30% of all trips made in
Farmington are three miles or less and 7% are a half mile or less.
While Farmington residents, workers, and visitors may not be
choosing to bike or walk for all their trips, there is great potential as
a large number of trips are short and could easily be made my foot,
bike, or other mobility assisting device other than an automobile.
as observed in Figure 2.3, for all modes of transportation, the
majority of Farmington residents have a commute to work that
is longer than 10 minutes. However, there are almost 1,300
2-5 existing conditions
177
898
2,636
3,995
More Workers than Vehicles
Households with No Workers
Less Workers than Vehicles
Equal Number of Workers and Vehicles
Figure 2.5 Vehicle Competitive Households in Farmington
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Table 2.2 Where Farmington Residents Work
WoRk LoCATioN WoRkERS PERCENT
Farmington, MN 1,278 10.0%
minneapolis, mn 1,199 9.4%
eagan, mn 1,064 8.3%
lakeville, mn 965 7.5%
st. Paul, mn 860 6.7%
Burnsville, mn 859 6.7%
Bloomington, mn 818 6.4%
apple Valley, mn 780 6.1%
rosemount, mn 322 2.5%
edina, mn 274 2.1%
all other locations 4,382 34.2%
ToTAL 12,801 100.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-
Destination Employment Statistics 2015
Table 2.3 Where Farmington Workers Live
HoME LoCATioN WoRkERS PERCENT
Farmington, MN 1,278 25.5%
lakeville, mn 591 11.8%
apple Valley, mn 334 6.7%
rosemount, mn 173 3.5%
Burnsville, mn 170 3.4%
northfield, mn 162 3.2%
eagan, mn 150 3.0%
minneapolis, mn 106 2.1%
st. Paul, mn 92 1.8%
Hastings, mn 67 1.3%
all other locations 1,880 37.6%
ToTAL 5,003 100.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-
Destination Employment Statistics 2015
Farmington residents that have less than a 10 minute commute. this
is further demonstrated in Figure 2.4 which shows that of the 12,800
workers that live in Farmington, there are almost 1,300 that also
work Farmington. it can be assumed that those with less than a 10
minute commute both live and work in Farmington.
Because such a large gap exists between the amount of people
who are currently walking and biking to work (148 people) and the
amount of people who live and work in Farmington with less than
a 10-minute commute (~1,300 people), there is great potential
to increase the non-motorized transportation mode share with
improved facilities. the availability and quality of biking and walking
infrastructure in adjacent and nearby cities also matters because
most Farmington residents work outside of the city and most
Farmington workers live outside the city, as seen in table 2.2 and
table 2.3.
all of the census data presented here points to an opportunity to
increase the mode share of biking and walking as a viable means of
transportation for a significant number of people living and working
in Farmington.
Selected Household Characteristics
2-6
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Table 2.4 Zero Vehicle Households
HouSEHoLd TyPE #%
number of Zero
Vehicle Households 144 1.9%
total Households 7,706 100.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American
Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Table 2.5 Poverty Status of Farmington Residents
SuBjECT ToTAL
PoPuLATioN
BELoW
PovERTy
LEvEL
% BELoW
PovERTy
LEvEL
Population Below Poverty level 22,090 627 2.8%
White 20,088 439 2.2%
Black or african american 304 85 28.0%
american indian 39 9 23.1%
asian 708 7 1.0%
Hispanic or latino 774 31 4.0%
other 951 87 9.1%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
When a household has more workers than it has vehicles, it is
classified as a vehicle competitive household. People within a
vehicle competitive household are oftentimes faced with the
decision of how they are going to get around because they do not
have the option to drive for every trip. When faced with conflicting
travel situations, some people decide to work alternative work
schedules, while others shift to a different means of transportation
such as carpooling, transit, walking, or biking.
Figure 2.5 highlights the number of vehicle competitive households
in Farmington. knowing this data provides a clue as to how many
workers could potentially benefit from a more connected bicycle
and pedestrian network. it also highlights the fact that, within the
right circumstances, not every eligible driver within a household in
Farmington needs to own a car, as they can supplement some trips
by walking or biking to nearby destinations.
the number of zero vehicle households, as presented in table
2.4, brings attention to the fact that there are 144 households in
Farmington that do not own a vehicle. these residents must rely
on other means of transportation. transit, non-motorized facilities,
and mobility services all need to work in conjunction year-around to
serve these households.
according to aaa, it costs an average of $8,849 to operate the
average car for 2018, or about $737 per month1. this amount
factors in all costs of auto ownership over the life of the vehicle. For
those living at or below the poverty level, vehicle ownership can
be a significant cost burden. this cost burden can be eliminated
or significantly lowered if a safe and convenient non-motorized
transportation network exists.
as seen in table 2.5, 627 (2.8%) Farmington residents live at or
below poverty level. a disproportionate level of minority populations
live below the poverty level in Farmington.
1 Your Driving Costs: How Much Are You Really Paying to Drive? [Brochure]. (2018
Edition) Heathrow, FL: AAA Association Communication
2-7 existing conditions
2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA
DRAFT DECEMBER 7, 2018
I Contents
Relevant Plan Review
a variety of plan documents were reviewed during the planning
process. these plans and supporting planning/policy documents
have been created over the last 10 years and provide a foundation
to build the future bike and pedestrian network in Farmington. the
following is an inventory of relevant findings from this plan review.
2040 City of Farmington Draft Comprehensive Plan (2018)
the city of Farmington updated it’s city-wide comprehensive
plan in 2018. this plain will serve as a strategic guide for future
development and public infrastructure to ensure a safe, well-
designed and economical environment for residential, commercial,
industrial and public activities. the draft plan was submitted to the
metropolitan council in december of 2018. the following 2040
draft comprehensive Plan chapters contain relevant background
and guidance for the Bike + Ped Plan:
Transportation
»stated goal to “promote transportation alternatives ensuring that
non-motorized, transit, and motorized travel needs are met in a
balanced manner consistent with community values.”
»current crash data shows that pedestrian crashes have been
located within neighborhood streets or along more rural sections
of roadways including akin road and Pilot knob road. Bicyclist
crash data indicates facilities may be needed along csaH 50 and
tH 3.
»tH 3 will likely expand into a 4-lane divided roadway.
»there is no scheduled or planned public transit service within
Farmington. an extension of the red line Bus rapid transit (Brt)
will result in a future station at cedar avenue and 215th street in
lakeville (closest transit station to Farmington).
»Future collector roadways in Farmington will have a multi-purpose
trail on one side, and a sidewalk on the other. Future local streets
are to have sidewalks on one side of the road, both sides if
conditions allow.
»the metropolitan council has defined the regional Bicycle
transportation network (rBtn) in an effort to establish regional
bike networks. Within the city of Farmington, three tier 2 rBtn
corridors have been identified: along csaH 50 between the west
city boundary and downtown, generally along a future alignment
of cr 33 extension or north creek, and an east/northwest
connection from Farmington into lakeville.
Cover of 2040 Comprehensive Plan DRAFT
December 7, 2018. Source: City of Farmington
RBTN Network, as shown in the 2040
Comprehensive Plan Draft. Tier 2 Corridors are
shown in green. Source: City of Farmington
2-8
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space
Plan, per 2040 Comprehensive Plan Draft. Source:
City of Farmington
Sustainability
»the city of Farmington is a member of minnesota greenstep
cities, and has been awarded step 2 status, as of 2018.
»there are at least (12) greenstep actions related to improving
the bicycle and pedestrian network that, if implemented, would
contribute towards reaching step 3 status for the city.
Parks and Recreation
»an updated existing and Proposed Park, trail and open space
plan is included in this chapter
»a recommendation includes development of a “Bike and
Pedestrian Plan that can be used to identify where [trail] gaps
currently occur along with ensuring that future new trails are
connected to the existing trail network.”
»the Five Year Parks and trail improvement Budget does not show
any funding allocated for trail improvements, highlighting a need
for a long-term funding strategy.
2-9 existing conditions
2030 Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009)
a detailed Parks and recreation master Plan was developed in
coordination with the 2030 comprehensive Plan update in 2009.
this plan has served to guide the last 10 years of parks, open space,
and trail development in Farmington.
»an existing and Proposed Park, trail, and open space Plan
served as primary guidance for park and trail development from
2009-2018.
»this plan indicated strong community and city support for
expansion of the trail and sidewalk system
»a trail classification system was created, which includes park trails,
connector trails, bikeways, alternative use trails and greenways.
this classification system does not appear to have been
consistently employed over the last 10 years.
»trail priorities that were identified in this plan include construction
of ada compliant trails, loop trails of varying levels of difficulty,
adding trail amenities (restrooms, benches, bike racks,
drinking fountains) throughout the system, connecting future
neighborhood trails to commercial and industrial areas, and
developing a long-term financial plan for the development of
parks, open spaces and trails.
Safe Routes to School: Meadowview Elementary (2018)
a number of safe routes to school plans were completed in
2018 for Farmington area Public schools, including meadowview
elementary school. the purpose of this plan is to provide
recommendations and strategies to make walking and biking to
and around meadowview elementary school a safe, comfortable,
and fun activity for all students and families. the plan is structured
on the 6 e’s (engineering, evaluation, encouragement, education,
enforcement) and was created through the mndot srts Planning
assistance program.
»Per district policy, students must live at least 1 mile from their
school to qualify for district-provided (bus) transportation
»a survey of meadowview students in spring 2018 showed that
over 50% of students take the bus to and from school, 36% are
dropped off by family vehicle, 2% carpool, 6% walk, 2% walk, and
4% use other means of transportation.
»according to a parent survey, distance, weather, speed of traffic
and safety of intersections were the top reasons for not allowing
their kids to walk or bike to school.
»infrastructure recommendations include a focus on safety
improvements along 195th street (csaH 64) and creating another
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
hg
")
!(
!(
!(
’
’
")
NORTH CREEK PARK
AUTUMNGLENOPENSPACE
RAMBLINGRIVER PARK
PR
A
I
R
I
E
V
I
E
W
W
A
T
E
R
W
A
Y
G
R
E
E
N
W
A
Y
VERMILLIONGROVEPARK
FARMINGTONPRESERVEPARK
DAISYKNOLLPARK
MEADOWVIEWPARK
LAKE JULIAPARK
MIDDLECREEKPARK
FA
I
RHILL
G
R
EE
NWAY
NORTHCREEKGREENWAY
PINEKNOLLPARK
PRAIRIEVIEWPARK
FAIRHILLSPARK
HILL DEEPARK
EVERGREENKNOLL PARK
HILLVIEWPARK
TAMARACKPARK
DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK
WESTVIEWPARK
SCHMITZMAKIARENA
TROYHILLPARK
SILVERSPRINGSPARK
(FutureMiddleCreekGreenway)
(F u t u r e M i d d le C r e e k G r e e n w a y )
(
F
u
t
u
r
e
N
o
rt
h
C
r
e
e
k
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
)
(Future South Creek Greenway)
(F u t u r e V e r m illi o n Ri v e r G r e e n w a y )
(FutureMiddleCreekGreenway)
NEW HIGH SCHOOL SITE
MEADOWVIEWELEMENTARYSCHOOL
FARMINGTONHIGH SCHOOL
FARMINGTONMIDDLE SCHOOLEAST & WEST
AKIN ROADELEMENTARYSCHOOL
FARMINGTONELEMENTARYSCHOOL
(FutureRegionalTrail)
(FutureRegionalTrail)
3
64
64
50
74
31
50
Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space Plan Map, 2008
Prepared for the Farmington Parks Departmentby the Dakota County Office of GIS.0 21 Miles
µ
City of Farmington
Legend
Existing Trails
Proposed Trails
Schools
City Parks
Private Parks
Greenways
Proposed Parks
hg Community
hg Neighborhood
Map dated January, 2008.
Project #12001
MEADOWVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
FARMINGTON AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Safe Routes to School
A plan to make walking and biking to school a safe, fun activity
JUNE 2018
Existing and Proposed Park, Trail and Open Space
Plan, per 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Source: City of
Farmington
(Above) Cover of Safe Routes to School Plan
for Meadowview Elementary School. Source:
Farmington Area Public Schools
2-10
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE STUDY | DRAFT DECEMBER, 2018 Introduction | 1-12
Figure 1-4: Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand Analysis
Pedestrian and Bicycle Demand Analysis, per
Dakota County Pedestrian and Bicycle Study.
Source: Dakota County
trail connection to the charleswood neighborhood to the east of
the school.
Dakota County Pedestrian and Bike Study (2018)
dakota county completed a Pedestrian and Bicycle study in 2018
as part of the dakota county 2040 transportation Plan update (to
be completed in 2019). the purpose of the Pedestrian and Bicycle
study is to create a unified vision for county-wide walking and
bicycling networks and to identify policies, strategies and tools to
encourage active living and improve community health.
»the study shows that within Farmington, there is moderate
demand for biking and walking in the downtown area, as well
as residential areas north of Highway 64 (195th street) near Pilot
knob road and surrounding Farmington High school.
»a level of traffic stress analysis was performed, identifying
comfort levels for existing county trails.
»the Planned county Bicycle network shows Pilot knob road and
Highway 64 included as planned and existing shared use (county)
trails through Farmington
City of Farmington Development Code
development standards per city of Farmington development code
were reviewed for specific items pertaining to bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. the following are key findings from this review:
»sidewalks shall be no less than 5’ in width, and provided where
city council deems it appropriate.
»trails shown in the comprehensive Plan shall be no less than 8’ in
width.
»all trails shall have at least 20’ wide access where the trail
connects to a street or sidewalks.
»developers are responsible for construction of trails as shown in
the comprehensive Plan.
»trails shall connect with existing trails or sidewalks.
»the Planning division, Parks and recreation department, and
engineering department shall determine feasibility for trail
construction near wetland or ponds.
»specific design standards exist for the spruce street commercial,
mixed use and Business/Flex Zoning districts. these standards
include provisions for sidewalks, pedestrian walkways, and
pedestrian amenities. notably, bike parking shall be installed
at 10% of the total number of automobile spaces within
developments in these districts.
2-11 existing conditions
4t
h
6t
h
7t
h
3r
d
1s
t
5t
h
8t
h
2n
d
Spruce
Ak
i
n
208th
Main
Maple
Hickory
Willow
207th
Oak
Di
v
i
s
i
o
n
Pine
206th
Linden
Da
l
l
a
s
9th
Walnut
Co
l
o
r
a
d
o
Beech
Locust
213th
Ho
n
e
y
s
u
c
k
l
e
We
s
t
v
i
e
w
Westdel
209th
De
v
o
n
s
h
i
r
e
Ash
We
s
t
w
o
o
d
We
s
t
g
a
i
l
Hi
g
h
l
a
n
d
Locust
Maple
Pine
Oak
Beech
8t
h
7t
h
Hickory
Spruce
Pine
Hickory
Hickory
5t
h
8t
h
Walnut
Beech
")74
")50
")31
")66
")31
¬«3
Proposed Sidewalk + Mid-block Pedestrian Crossing
Proposed Trail
Proposed Regional Trail Connection
Existing Trail
Existing Sidewalk
Railroad Crossing
Signaled Intersection
Project Boundary
Pedestrian & bike circulation plan shows key opportunities for improving downtown’s walking and biking connections.
Figure 14: Bike and Pedestrian Network Plan
27 Farmington Downtown Redevelopment Plan
Highway 3 Corridor Plan (2019)
concurrent with the development of the Bike + Ped Plan, the city
of Farmington is developed a Highway 3 corridor Plan, which
was adopted by the city council on June 3rd, 2019. Highway 3
(tH 3) is a sate highway with existing land use incompatibilities
including a mix of residential homes and businesses. several smaller
redevelopment efforts and projects involving new construction or
redevelopment of existing buildings have occurred in recent years.
the purpose of the plan is to identify unique re-development
opportunities with the understanding that Highway 3 will likely
expand into a divided 4-lane highway.
»the project area consists of an approximately 2-mile stretch of tH
3 north of 225th street and south of Vermillion river trail (cr 66)
»community input gathered during this planning process includes
a number of issues raised related to biking and walking in
Farmington, including a concern for high vehicular speeds.
»today, frontage roads along the highway serve as informal ways
for bicyclists and pedestrians to travel along the corridor, in
addition to portions of paved wide shoulders along tH 3.
»in general, there is a need for improved pedestrian crossings
at major intersections, as well as dedicated pedestrian facilities
along the corridor
Downtown Redevelopment Plan (2016)
a downtown redevelopment Plan was created and adopted in
2016. this plan serves as a guide for the city council, economic
development authority, and other advisory commissions to identify
opportunities in the downtown area for redevelopment. the study
area encompasses 20 blocks between 1st street, Walnut street, 5th
street and the Vermillion river.
»Within the study area, an inventory of existing sidewalks and trails
show a lack of trails within the downtown area, although most
streets are served by sidewalks on both sides of the street
»downtown core redevelopment initiatives include improving
the pedestrian environment, adding bike trail facilities to the
river and regional trail connections, completing a downtown trail
network, and improving Highway 50 crossings for pedestrians and
bicyclists.
»the Bike and Pedestrian network Plan in this study shows a
proposed trail connection along the railroad to Pine street,
connecting to rambling river Park, as well as sidewalk
connections along 2nd street between Highway 50 and Walnut
street.
Example of community input comment gathered
through a Social Pinpoint web survey for
the Highway 3 Corridor Plan. Source: City of
Farmington
Bike and Pedestrian Network Plan, per the
Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Source: City of
Farmington
2-12
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
36 Chapter 3 the Plan
Figure 36. North Creek Greenway segment 3 concept plan
Segment 3: lakeville and Farmington North (3.5 miles)
From County Road 46 / 160th Street the
greenway will connect through the current
mining/future development area to the
Brandtjen Farm neighborhood and East
Lake Park, a City of Lakeville community
park. From East Lake Park to 195th Street,
the greenway will follow North Creek. In
this segment, much of the trail already is
constructed, with a few trail gaps.
From Fairhill Park the greenway heads
directly south, following North Creek about
a mile. North Creek then veers east while
the greenway continues south, crossing
Middle Creek and following the west side
of the Canadian Pacific Railway to the
Vermillion River. At the Vermillion River,
the greenway follows the river in both
directions: west to downtown Farmington
and Rambling River Park and east to a
community park in Empire Township.
Water crossings
For this segment of the greenway, three
bridge crossings will be necessary, as
shown on Figure 36. Bridges will be needed
to cross the north branch of North Creek in
an area to be developed in the future, the
wetland near 189th Street in Farmington
and Middle Creek north of downtown
Farmington.
Rambling River trailhead and downtown
Farmington
A trailhead is recommended at the ice arena
on the southwest edge of Rambling River
Park. Here there are opportunities to share
existing parking and restroom facilities
and add picnicking, interpretation and
wayfinding.
North Creek Greenway Segment Concept Plan,
per North Creek Greenway Master Plan. Source:
Dakota County
North Creek Greenway Master Plan 2011 37
Connections to destinations in downtown Farmington are also recommended. A trail link to a neighborhood gateway at
Farmington’s Depot Art Park is suggested. The trail connection to this gateway is shown in Figure 37.
Natural resources and water quality
east lake
f Continue buckthorn management.
f Perform prescribed burns on restored prairies on upland mine areas and oak woodlands.
f Address fall algae blooms in the lake.
north Creek corridor and preserve
f Restore prairie on uplands and oak woodlands on the berms to the east.
f Manage invasive vegetation along North Creek and adjacent areas.
Vermillion river and rambling river Park
f Widen and maintain stream buffers with native plants to improve floodplain wetlands and forest quality.
Rambling
River Park
3
Dodge
Middle
School
School
ballfields
Riverview
Elementary
School
200 Feet
ELM STREET
AK
I
N
R
O
A
D
CH
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
Proposed
bridge over
Vermillion
River
Proposed North Creek
Greenway regional
trail
Connection
to downtown
Farmington
Schmitz Maki
Arena
To Lakeville Depot
Way
Arts
Park
P
P
Figure 37. Downtown Farmington and rambling river Park
Trail connection
Wayfinding
Proposed grade
separated crossing
Existing grade
separated crossing
Existing regional trail
Existing local trail
Proposed regional trail
Proposed local trail
Greenway corridor
Gateway
landmark
Ver m i l l ion Riv e r
50
Downtown Farmington and Rambling River Park Concept Plan, per North Creek Greenway
Master Plan. Source: Dakota County
North Creek Greenway Master Plan
north creek is a tributary of the Vermillion river that connects
eagan, apple Valley, lakeville, Farmington and empire township.
the 14-mile north creek greenway will connect important regional
destinations, such as lebanon Hills regional Park, the minnesota
Zoo, downtown Farmington, the Vermillion river and Whitetail
Woods regional Park. today, portions of the regional trail are
completed within Farmington:
»section through north creek Park, Jim Bell Park and Preserve
Park crossing 195th street with a tunnel and traveling further
south along north creek.
»section along rambling river Park from schmitz-maki arena to
where the railroad corridor crosses the Vermillion river, following
the railroad north to 205th street
2-13 existing conditions
Table 2.6 Existing Facility Length
FACiLiTy TyPE LENGTH
(FT)
LENGTH
(Mi)
WALkiNG oNLy
sidewalk 163,502 31.0
natural surface 5,301 1.0
Boardwalk 1,489 0.3
MuLTi-uSE
Bridge 1,258 0.2
Paved trail 246,888 46.8
ToTAL MuLTi-uSE 248,146 47.0
ToTAL BikE ANd
WALk FACiLiTiES 418,438 79.2
Source: HKGi, City of Farmington
* Only includes paved trail and bridge facility
types
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Network
the city currently owns and maintains 47 miles of paved asphalt
trails, one mile of natural surface trails and about a half mile of
boardwalks and bridges. consistently community surveys show
trails are one of the most used and most popular park/recreational
facilities in cities. Farmington residents overwhelmingly appreciate
and use the existing trail network, according to information gathered
through community engagement for this plan. there are 31 miles
of concrete sidewalks in Farmington, most of which are located in
the older neighborhoods of Farmington. all of these facilities are
illustrated in Figure 2.6 and quantified in table 2.6.
a majority of the paved trail system was constructed during the
peak of development in the city, which that occurred from the 1980s
through 2006. as a result, the city did not provide capital funding
to build most of the current trail system. the city has made an effort
to fund the construction of paved trails where gaps have occurred.
since the city began constructing trails in the 1980s, it has placed a
requirement that all trails be accessible according the requirements
outlined in the americans with disabilities act (ada). the ada
requires trails to be relatively flat with a slope of 5% or less. in
situations where ada requirements could not be met, the city has
provided a secondary or alternative trail route that accommodates
people of all ages and abilities to use the trail system.
a number of segments of the north creek greenway, a regional
trail, have been constructed throughout Farmington. a segment of
the grail exists along the north side of Farmington, running through
north creek Park, Jim Bell Park and Preserve, crossing csaH 64
via a tunnel underpass and continuing about a quarter mile south.
another segment exists through rambling river Park, alongside the
Vermillion river. another segment has been constructed along the
Vermillion river in empire township, east of Farmington city limits.
2-14
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
NORTH C R E E K G R E EN W AY
V E R M I L L I ON
R I V E R G R E ENW AY
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTAFF AVE
19 3 RD STW
EATON AVE
U P PER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EGRET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WAY
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183RD S T W
E
MERALD T RL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
C
KSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD
ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPL
O
RERWAY
EV
ENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIA
MOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TONDR
EXCALIB UR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DU
P
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farm ington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
Dakota County Greenways
Existing
Alternate
Farmington Bike/Walk Facilities
Boardwalk
Bridge
Sidewalks (Pedestrian Only)
Natural Surface
Paved Trail
F00.5 10.25
Miles
Figure 2.6 Existing Facilities by Type
2-15 existing conditions
Examples of Facilities and Crossings
Designed for All Users level of Traffic Stress Analysis
Comfort levels of Biking
not all people have the same level of comfort when it comes to
bicycling. originally developed by roger geller at the city of
Portland (or) the “Four types of Bicyclists” (see Figure 2.7) are
meant to guide efforts in assessing what certain segments of a
population require or want in a bikeway facility. geller suggested
that most people can be categorized into the following four groups:
1. Strong and Fearless: People willing to bicycle with limited or no
bicycle-specific infrastructure
2. Enthusiastic and Confident: People willing to bicycle if some
bicycle-specific infrastructure is in place
3. Interested but Concerned: People willing to bicycle if high-
quality bicycle infrastructure is in place
4. Not able or Interested: People unwilling to bicycle even if high-
quality bicycle infrastructure is in place
these typologies help us identify which segments of the population
need lower stress facilities to try bicycling or to bicycle more often.
most cities find that as they build safer and more comfortable
bicycle facilities, the number of people bicycling increases. this is
due to the fact that one of the largest groups of bicyclists identify
as “interested but concerned” with biking. When bicycle facilities
are built to the needs of the “Interested but Concerned”, the results
of investment yield the highest number of users. additionally, when
more people start bicycling because of a more comfortable network,
biking becomes safer due, to the fact that motorists are more aware
of the bicyclists presence.
Level of Traffic Stress
riding a bicycle should not require bravery, courage, or expensive
specialized gear. Yet, this is often the perception among cyclists
and non-cyclists alike. For a bicycling network to attract the widest
2-16
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Figure 2.7 Four Types of Bicyclists in Farmington
STRONG AND FEARlESS ENTHUSIASTIC AND CONFIDENT
INTERESTED BUT CONCERNED NOT ABlE OR NOT INTERESTED
»Advanced,
confident rider
who is comfortable
riding in most traffic
situations
»Tend to have high
performance gear,
clothing
»Take the shortest
routes and seek
challenges
»Prefer to ride
separated from
pedestrians due to
higher speeds
»Comfortable sharing
the road with
vehicular traffic but
prefer bicycle lanes,
multi-use trails
»May choose to
bike for health,
environmental,
transportation or
recreation
»May or may not have
high performance
gear, clothing
»People who have no
current interest in biking
or physically unable to
ride a bicycle
»Often cite far distances,
weather, costs as reason
for not biking
»Improvements in local
facilities and networks,
encouragement and
education could help
make riding (or walking/
non-motorized travel) a
viable opportunity
»Prefer to take off-street paths or
low-volume residential streets
»Safety is a big concern for these
riders
»Don’t generally self-identify as
‘bicyclists’
»Largest potential for increases in
ridership
»Improvements in facilities and
networks would make riding a
viable, more comfortable option
10%34%9%47%
FOUR TyPES OF CyClISTS IN FARMINGTON:
Farmington residents were presented with
the four types of bicyclists concept as a part
of the community survey for the Farmington
Bicycle and Pedestrian plan. Survey
participants were then asked to categorize
themselves based on what type of cyclist
group they thought they belonged in.
Those results are displayed as percentages
in Figure 2.7. Those that classify themselves
as “Interested but Concerned” make up the
largest cohort. This trend is typical among
most cities in the US and indicates that as
more safe and comfortable bicycle and trail
facilities are built Farmington, the more
people will begin to try bicycling or bicycle
more often.
2-17 existing conditions
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTAFF AVE
1 93 RD STW
EATON AVE
U PPER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EGRET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WAY
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183R D S T W
E
MERALD TRL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
CKSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPL
O
RERWAY
E
V
ENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIAMOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TON
DR
EXCALIB UR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DUP
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farmington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
Level of Traffic Stress
1 High Comfort
2
3
4 Low Comfort
F00.5 10.25
Miles
Figure 2.8 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis (All Levels of Comfort)
2-18
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
possible segment of the population, there should be an excellent
network of ‘low stress’ routes. these routes provide separation,
through distance and/or physical barriers, between bicyclists and
vehicles and directly connect destinations. level of traffic stress
(lts) is an objective, data-driven approach to evaluating bikeways
by matching up roadway design, traffic volumes, and motor
vehicle speeds to individual perceptions of bicyclist comfort and
a willingness to travel out of ones’ way to maintain that level of
comfort. levels of traffic stress range from 1 to 4, and are defined as
follows:
»lts 1:
-Strong separation (physical barrier such as curb and distance
between bicyclist and vehicle) from all vehicles except low speed
(<25 mph), low volume traffic (<2,000 vehicles/day), even at
intersections
-Simple crossings (low traffic volumes, short crossing distance,
traffic control device present, low traffic speed)
-Demands little concentrated attention from cyclists and is
attractive enough for a relaxing bike ride
-Suitable for children and those who are “Interested but
Concerned”
»lts 2:
-Except in low speed / low volume traffic situations, cyclists have
their own place to ride that keeps them from having to interact
with traffic except at formal crossings
Figure 2.9 Criteria for Determining Level of Traffic Stress
DETERMINING THE lOw-STRESS BICyClE NETwORk:
Criteria adapted from “Low-Stress Bicycling
and Network Connectivity” by Mekuria,
Furth, and Nixon published by the Mineta
Transportation Institute were used to
perform the level of traffic stress analysis
for the Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan. For a deeper dive into the criteria
developed in this report go to the link
below.
http://transweb.sjsu.edu/research/low-stress-
bicycling-and-network-connectivity
2-19 existing conditions
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTAFF AVE
1 93 RD STW
EATON AVE
U PPER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EG RET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WA Y
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183RD S T W
E
MERALD TRL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
CKSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPL
O
RERWAY
EVENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIA
MOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TONDR
EXCALIBUR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DUP
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farmington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
High Comfor t Network
Level of Traffic Stress
1 High Comfort
2-4 Other Levels of Comfort
Served by High Comfort Trail Facility (1 Block Distance)
Served by Other Level of Comfort Trail Facility (1 Block Distance)
F00.5 10.25
Miles
Figure 2.10 High Comfort Network Service Area
2-20
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
-Physical separation from higher speed and multi-lane traffic
-Crossings that are easy for an adult to negotiate, children with
help
-Demands more attention than might be expected from children
-A level of traffic stress that most adults can tolerate, particularly
those who are “Interested but Concerned”
»lts 3:
-Involves interaction with moderate speed or multi-lane traffic, or
close proximity to higher speed traffic
-A level of traffic stress acceptable to those classified as
“Enthusiastic and Confident” but still prefer having their own
dedicated space
»lts 4:
-Involves interaction with higher speed traffic or close proximity
to high speed traffic.
-A level of stress acceptable only to those who identify as “Strong
and Fearless”
table 2.7 breaks down Farmington’s existing bicycle network into
the four levels of traffic stress. of the 49.5 miles of bicycle and
pedestrian network in Farmington, 68% is classified as a high
comfort facility, made up of trails that are separated from high
volume roadways. displayed in Figure 2.8, the high comfort bicycle
network is spread throughout the city with the exception of the
older areas of Farmington around downtown where bike facilities
are absent. overall, approximately 21% of Farmington residents
live within one block (325 ft) of a trail. as observed in Figure 2.10,
when only accounting for the high comfort trail network, 17% of
Farmington residents are within one block (325 ft) of a facility.
a bicycle trip is only as comfortable as the most difficult intersection
crossing. Because of this, many of the trail segments in Farmington
that would have been classified as high comfort (lts 1) have been
downgraded to lts 2, lts 3 or lts 4, primarily because they cross
high volume and high speed roadways where there is little or no
protection from automobile traffic. crossing arterial roadways such
as Highway 3, Pilot knob road (county Highway 31), 195th street
(county Highway 64), and 212th street (county Highway 50) is
particularly dangerous and stressful for bicyclists and pedestrians;
trails that cross these roadways and run along side of them are
stressful as well.
ACCESS TO THE TRAIl NETwORk
21%
of Farmington
Residents live within
1 block of a trail
17%
of Farmington
Residents live within
1 block of the high
comfort trail network
Source: HKGi, US Census Block Group Data, Met
Council Generalized Land Use Data
Table 2.7 Level of Traffic Stress Analysis
LTS SCoRE LENGTH
(Mi)%
1 - High comfort 33.7 68%
2 12.6 25%
3 0.3 1%
4 - low comfort 2.9 6%
ToTAL 49.5 100%
Source: HKGi
2-21 existing conditions
EUREKA TWP.
LAKEVILLE
EMPIRE TWP.
CASTLE
ROCK TWP.
¬«66
¬«74
¬«64
¬«31
¬«50
¬«64
11TH ST
M E A D O W LARK
W
AY
213TH ST W
FLAGSTA
FF AVE
1 9 3 RD STW
EATON AVE
U PPER 182N
DST W
180TH ST W
187TH S T W
190TH ST W
WALNUT ST
A
K
I
N
R
D
PINE ST
SPRUCE ST
WILLOW ST
6TH ST
224TH ST W
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
A
VE
FAIRVIEW
LN
13TH ST
206TH S T W
EGRET WAY
2ND ST
E
U
CLIDPAT
H
200THSTW
WILL
O
W
TRL
D O V E R D R
9TH ST
ENGLISH
A
V
E
EVENSONG AVE
HERITAGE WAY
199TH
STW
198TH ST W
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
PATH
E
V
E
R
E
S
T
P
A
T
H
DIVISION ST
UPPER 183RD ST W
MAPLE ST
EVERHIL L A V E
203RDS T W
185TH ST W
EC
H
O
DR
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
U
C
L
I
D
S
T
OAK ST
12TH ST
MAIN ST
CA M D EN
P
A
T
H
D
U
L
U
T
H
S
T
183RD S T W
E
MERALD TRL
EN
GLEWOO
D
W
A
Y
E
R
I
CKSON
PAT H
LARCH ST
LOCUST ST
14TH ST
4TH ST
1ST ST
3RD ST
5TH ST
ESCA
L
A
D
E
W
AY
EXPLO
RERWAY
E
VENING
STARWAY
D
U
N
B
A
R
AV
E
189TH ST W
DIAMOND PATH
208TH ST W
E
M
PIRE TRL
KNUTSEN DR
CYPR
E
S
S
D
R
EVE N S TONDR
EXCALIBUR
T
RL
DYLAN DR
DUP
ONT WAY
210TH ST W
220TH ST W
")3
")50
")3
Farmington City Boundary
Parks
Public School Facilities
High Comfort Network
Level of Traffic Stress
1 High Comfort
2-4 Other Levels of Comfort
F00.5 10.25
Miles
High Comfort Islands* (Bicycle)
*For illustrative purposes only and do not
represent actual bicycle travelsheds.
Figure 2.11 High Comfort Network Service Area Islands
2-22
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
While the lts analysis doesn’t directly measure level of comfort
for pedestrians, bicyclists have more aspects in common with
pedestrians than they do motor vehicles and there pedestrians and
bicycle share many of the same planning needs. also, pedestrians
may benefit from the level of stress analysis because most bike
facilities in Farmington are multi-use facilities.
High Comfort Islands
taking into account high stress crossings, Farmington’s high comfort
bicycle network becomes less of a network and more of a series
of islands, isolated from other trail connections. Figure 2.11 shows
seven distinct high comfort islands that exist within Farmington.
many high quality loop trails exist for recreational bicycle riding
within these islands, but moving throughout the city by bicycle
becomes much more difficult and dangerous. a person living within
the blue high comfort island will feel comfortable biking anywhere
within the blue area, but will feel separated from the rest of the
bicycling network even though some stressful crossing exist. the
same is true for each of the other six islands.
some high comfort islands are larger than others, signifying a more
connected high comfort network. For example, the yellow high
comfort island is the largest of all the islands. there is a high comfort
crossing that exists underneath the 195th st. bridge at north creek.
Because of flooding and snow cover, this area may be difficult to
cross during spring and winter, separating the high comfort island
into multiple pieces. grade separated crossings increase safety in
areas like these, however, cost and site constraints limit viability in all
cases.
Figure 2.11 shows that most parks in Farmington are served by the
trail network. However, there are some parks that aren’t connected
to the full high comfort network. schools are generally connected
to a trail network, with the exception of Farmington High school.
However, only one school is connected to a high comfort network
(levi P dodge middle school in the purple island). schools, in
particular, should be targeted for connection to high comfort trail
networks, in order to best allow children to walk or ride to school.
some of the high comfort islands in Farmington exist adjacent
to each others. For example, the blue and red islands exist on
opposite sides of Pilot knob road and the orange island is adjacent
to the blue island on the other side of 195th st. Future improved
intersection or mid-block crossings could significantly combine these
areas to create one large high comfort island. larger high comfort
islands mean that people can safely and comfortably travel to more
destinations in Farmington by bike. When executed correctly, safety
improvements to bicycling infrastructure improves safety for walking
as well, especially at intersections.
While many of the trails in Farmington are
classified as high comfort facilities, the roads they
have to cross make them feel more stressful.
2-23 existing conditions
Figure 2.12 Social Pinpoint Community Feedback
2-24
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Community Engagement Phase 1
community engagement uses community voices to influence and
shape the planning process. a robust community engagement
process paves the way for community support for the final
plan and makes implementation of plan elements easier. this
section highlights the comments of community members as they
participated in the variety of community engagement opportunities
throughout the planning process.
Social Pinpoint
social Pinpoint is a map-based online engagement tool that allows
community members to leave comments on specific areas of the
city via a map. Participants are then able to interact with each other,
by ‘liking’ or ‘disliking’ other comments, or replying directly into a
comment thread.
social Pinpoint was used during the first phase of community
engagement to identify areas in the city where:
»people currently or would like to bike and walk to,
»gaps in the bikeway and/or sidewalk network exist,
»speeding is a common issue,
»people feel unsafe while trying to cross the road as a bicyclist or
pedestrian, and
»segments of existing trails or sidewalks that need to be replaced
in total, social Pinpoint was open for comment for two months from
december 2018 to February 2019. over this period of time, 389
unique users visited the website, 174 comments were left by 50
people, and an average time of 14.5 minutes spent on the site by
visitors.
locations of comments gathered from social Pinpoint are shown in
Figure 2.12. the largest number of comments provided identified
dangerous crossings. the majority of these comments were placed
along the arterial roadways that run through Farmington, mainly
Highway 3, Pilot knob road (county Highway 31), 195th street
(county Highway 64), and 212th street (county Highway 50).
Participants indicated that Farmington schools and downtown
Farmington were two of the most desired destinations to walk and
bike to. currently, there is a large bike network gap in and around
downtown and many schools lack high comfort biking and walking
facilities.
Figure 2.13 Social Pinpoint Comments
Gathered by Category
SPEEDING TRAFFIC
POOR TRAIL /
SIDEWALK
CONDITIONS
BIKEWAY /
SIDEWALK GAP
BIKE / WALK
DESTINATIONS
DANGEROuS
CROSSINGS
2-25 existing conditions
Figure 2.14 How Often do Survey Respondents Bike and/or Walk for
Recreational and Transportation Reasons
25%
52%
11%
12%
5%
14%
11%
71%
Daily
1-3 Times a Week
Once a Month
Never
Exercise/
Recreation
Transportation
Trips
TRANSPORTATION TRIPS:
Transportation trips can be classified as
all trips whose primary purpose isn’t for
exercise and recreation and are destination
focused. Examples of transportation trips
include trips to:
»visit friends/family
»shopping/run errands
»restaurants, bars, and other
entertainment
»cultural, religious, or community events
»work
»school
»make connections with transit
Online Survey
another way the community was engaged was through an online
survey on survey monkey. the survey consisted of 11 questions and
focused on individual preferences regarding biking and walking as
well as what respondents thought of Farmington’s current and future
bike/walk network. in total, the survey was open for collection for 2
months from december 2018 to February 2019 and there were 650
responses recorded. a summary of the survey is highlighted below.
When survey respondents were asked how often they bike or walk
for exercise/recreational purposes vs. transportation purposes
(Figure 2.14) respondents indicated that they walk and bike for
recreational and exercise purposes far more often than they do
for transportation purposes. this may be, in part, due to the fact
that the current sidewalk and trail system in Farmington lends itself
to being more of a recreational based network due to the limited
connectivity as discussed earlier in the level of traffic stress analysis.
similar to the results received via the online mapping tool, survey
respondents feel that the most important destinations that they
would like to bike and walk to are parks, schools, and other
residential areas.
in the survey Farmington residents were presented with the four
types of bicyclists concept, survey participants were then asked to
categorize themselves based on what type of cyclist group they
thought they belonged in. those results are presented earlier in the
chapter in Figure 2.7 on page 2-17.
survey participants were asked “What keeps you from walking or
2-26
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
TOP 5 BARRIERS TO BIkING AND wAlkING IN FARMINGTON
1
2
3
4
5
icy/snowy trails and sidewalks
destinations are too Far apart
Feel unsafe at road crossings
Feel unsafe near traffic
trails and sidewalks are
incomplete
Source: Farmington Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
Survey, February 2019
Farmington Parks and Recreation Staff gather
ideas from residents at the Farmington
Community Expo, January 2019. Source: HKGi
biking more in Farmington?” the top responses include:
»my destinations are too far apart
»there are no trails or sidewalks where i want to go
»i don’t feel safe walking or biking near motorized traffic
»i don’t feel safe crossing busy intersections
»trails and sidewalks are too icy or snowy in the winter months
»trails and sidewalks are lacking lighting
With the exception of ‘my destinations are too far apart’ all of
these identified barriers to walking and biking in Farmington can
be addressed through improved network connections, intersection
improvements, trail amenities and year-round maintenance.
When asked how willing residents are to supporting a tax increase
or referendum to fund future bicycle and pedestrian facilities in
Farmington, the responses were varied. a weighted average showed
that fewer than half of residents would support these measures.
an open-ended question solicited general ideas from survey
participants to improve conditions for biking and walking in
Farmington. over two hundred ideas were shared, which shows the
support and dedication of Farmington residents to improving the
existing network and conditions for biking and walking.
Bike + Ped Plan (BPP) Committee
a Bike + Ped Plan committee was formed to serve an advisory role
during the planning process. this group was formed by the Parks
and recreation department, and a robust effort was made to include
representatives from a variety of interest groups and perspectives on
the committee.
over the course of the plan process, the Bike + Ped Plan committee
met three times. committee members were tasked with providing
input and ideas during key points during the plan process, as well as
assisting with outreach and community engagement efforts.
Open House at the Community Expo
a community open house was hosted in conjunction with the
Farmington community expo in January of 2019. this was an
opportunity for people to interact one-on-one with the plan
consultant and Parks and recreation director, to share ideas,
concerns and ask questions about the Bike + Ped Plan. Hundreds
of people attended the community expo, and approximately 55
people stopped by the Bike + Ped Plan booth to share their ideas.
Community Engagement Phase 2
2-27 existing conditions
community engagement Phase 1 centered around gathering
information from the community about their ideas, thoughts,
and concerns on the future of walking and biking in Farmington,
From this information, the draft network Plan and system
recommendations were created, with guidance from city staff and
the BPP committee, as well as through collaboration with dakota
county and mndot.
in april of 2019, community engagement Phase 2 was launched.
this effort focused on sharing the draft plan with the community
and interested stakeholders and gathering feedback on the draft
network Plan and system recommendations. With this feedback,
this draft document was revised and the implementation Plan was
created.
community engagement Phase 2 consisted of a public open house,
an online survey, and a joint council Work session.
Public Open House
to officially launch the draft Plan, an public open house was held at
Farmington city Hall on thursday, april 25th. this open house was
advertised through social media, word-of-mouth through the BPP
committee, and through city electronic communications.
the open house featured presentation boards that outlined the
plan process, results from the previous phase of community
engagement, existing conditions, the draft network Plan and system
recommendations. Participants were asked to provide specific
feedback on the boards or through comment cards.
Because attendance at the open house was low, the presentation
boards were displayed in the lobby of city Hall for two weeks to
allow more people the ability to view and comment.
2-28
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Public Open House at City Hall as part of Community Engagement Phase 2
Online Survey
an online survey was conducted in coordination with the open
House and launch of the draft Plan. the survey was advertised
alongside the public open house.
community members were encouraged to visit a web link to view
the draft Plan and system recommendations and weigh in on
how much they support the goals and system recommendations.
Participants were also asked to provide general comments and
feedback about the plan.
148 people participated in the online survey, which was open for
two weeks. in general, people expressed support for the ideas
presented, and gave specific suggestions to improve wording and
legibility of the plan.
Joint Council work Session
a joint council Work session was hosted at city Hall to present
the draft Plan, system recommendations, and in-progress
implementation Plan to the city council, Planning commission, and
Parks and recreation advisory committee. members of the BPP
committee were invited, as well as the general public.
Participants were invited to engage in discussion and provide written
feedback to the project team, which helped to inform final revisions
of the draft Plan.
2-29 existing conditions
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
CHAPTER 3
Network Plan
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-2 System Goals
3-2 Draft Network Plan
3-4 Network Plan Elements
3-9 Intersection Treatments
3-11 System Recommendations
3-1 netWork Plan
3-2
System Goals
the following goals provide direction for the overall bicycle and
pedestrian network in Farmington. the goals are broad statements
that are meant to be a guide for decision makers when vetting future
city projects, policies, and programs.
Goal 1
design, construct and maintain a comfortable, safe,
and connected bicycle and pedestrian network
suitable for those who are ‘interested but concerned’
and considerate of people of all ages and ability
levels in Farmington.
Goal 2
Building off of the existing system, improve
conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists to connect
to key community destinations such as parks, trails,
schools, civic and commercial areas.
Goal 3
make biking and walking a viable choice for
transportation within Farmington, as well as for
recreational purposes to encourage an active and
healthy lifestyle.
Draft Network Plan
the draft network Plan builds off of the existing trail and sidewalk
network, and identifies priority segments that will improve
connections throughout Farmington. the Plan shows:
»connector trails
»neighborhood trails
»sidewalks
»greenways
»on-street Bikeways
»intersection treatments
the following pages provide detailed descriptions and
recommendations for the network plan elements and intersection
treatments as shown on the draft network Plan.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-3 netWork Plan
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
G L A D S T O N ETRL
BRENN
AN PATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
MEA D O W L A R K W A Y
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRY VIEW TRL
ELK RIVERTRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181ST STW
UPPER 182N D ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY K N L
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMICDR
CLAIRECT
EA G L E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VIE
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
A
V
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIE VIE W TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND STW
FORMOSA AVE
EU
C
LID PA
T
H
CAMROSE WAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNETRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE DR
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO RSE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D U LCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXC
EPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKS DR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAXAVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORGE T O W N W AY
CAR ME L T R L
EUC
LI
D
S
T
FIR
ESI
D
E
L
N
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIER
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
EN
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RDST W
191STST W
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R L IN G T O N PATH
EV
E
R
GR
E
E
N
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
A
V
E
EN
G
L
E
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN
ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLE
R
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DUL U T H CIR
F
URY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EVERT
O
N
C
T
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
EX
O
D
U
S
A
VE
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOWWAY
DOVER CT
LOWERHERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
C
AN
AR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O RMOSACT
CENTURYCT
GOLDFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARRIS
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
IL
CT
B
EAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
RI
G
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T T
R
L
EXP
L
ORER
WAY
CAMBRIA CT
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
UN
B
A
R
AV
E
UPPER179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
ENHANCE
CT
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHCT
ENIGMAWAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRETRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
F
O
N
T
A
N
A P
A
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMO N D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
DR
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEO PATRAD
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
RUITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEYDR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWINPONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
U
TIVE
PATH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDIN G WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ET TY SB U R G WAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
PATH
EASTOAKSDR
COLORADO AVED
YERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIA WAY
TAMAR ACK TRL
E
M
B
R
Y A
V
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOXAVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONT
WAY
A NTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACKPARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
E
VERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
GLADSTONETRL
BRENN
ANPATH
FESTAL AVEFIELDCREST AVE
MEADOWLARKWAY
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRYVIEWTRL
ELKRIVERTRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181STSTW
UPPER 182ND ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
K
IN
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O L
N
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURYKNL
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIREVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINITRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMICDR
CLAIRE
CT
EAGLEWOODTRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
A
V
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYS
I
D
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIEVIE W TRL
206THSTW
CAS C A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND ST W
FORMOSAAVE
EUCLI
D PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDER
LN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNETRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKEDR
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHORSEBLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATHEAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
FOLSOM PATH
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAY
DR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
DULCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGHTWAY
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EX
C
EPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSCT
ENFIELD WAYFIVEOAKSDR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
FREEPORTWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAXAVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORGETOWNWAY
CAR ME L T R L
EUC
L
ID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLACIERWAY
CA
M
DEN
PA
T
H
EM
BR
Y
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H ST
174TH ST W
EXCEL CT
183RDSTW
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DEN
ALI CT
B U R LI N G T O N PAT H
EVER
GR
E
E
N
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
FORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
A
V
E
E
N
G
L
E
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LNENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DULUTHCIR
FU
R
Y
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSO
N
PA
T
H
184TH ST W
EVERT
O
N
C
T
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
EX
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRDPATHGLASGOWWAY
DOVER CT
LOWER HERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
C
A
N
A
RY
PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
FORMOSACT
CENTURYCT
GOLD
F
INCH
DR
C
A
R
A
V
E
L
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
IS
O
N
LN
GANNON WAYFLORIN AVEFIRTREEPL
CATTA
IL
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T
W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
ENRIGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T T
R
L
EXP
L
ORER
WAY
CAMBRIA C T
EVENING
STARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
UN
B
A
R A
V
E
UPPER179THSTW
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPERORCT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHCT
ENIGMAWAY
203RDCTW
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRETRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PATH
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMONDCT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEOPATRAD
R
177TH ST W
EUCLIDWAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
SE
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEYDR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY176TH ST W
TWIN PONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
CU
TIVE
PATH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDINGWAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
GETTYSBURGWAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
I
E
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
YERSPASS
MUN
ICIPALDR
ESTATE
AVE
GARCIAWAY
TAMARACKTRL
E
M
B
R
Y
A
V
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOXAVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONT
WAY
ANTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
HAMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERHILL AVE
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
193RD 193RD ST W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
UPPER 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
LAKE MARION GREENWAY
A
BC
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
CR 64 / 195TH ST W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
G L A D S T O N ETRL
BRENNANPATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
MEA D O W L A R K W AY
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRYVIEWTRL
ELK RIVER TRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181ST STW
UPPER 182N D ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY KN L
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMIC DR
CLAIRECT
EA G L E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
AV
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIE VIEW TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202NDST W
FORMOSA AVE
EU
CLID PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNE TRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE D R
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO RSE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D ULCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXCEPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKSDR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAX
AVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORG E T O W N W AY
CAR ME L T R L
E
UC
LID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIE
R
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
E
N
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RD ST W
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R L IN G T O N PATH
EV
E
R
G
R
E
EN
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
AV
E
EN
G
LE
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DUL U T H CIR
FURY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EV
ERT
O
N
CT
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
E
X
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW
WAY
DOVER CT
LOWER HERITAGE WAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
CA
NAR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O RMOSA CT
CENTURYCT
GO
L
DFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
I
S
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
I
L
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T
T
R
L
EXP
L
O
RER
WAY
CAMBRIA CT
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
U
N
B
A
R
A
V
E
UPPER 179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISH C T
ENIGMAWAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRE
TRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PA
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMON D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEO PATRA
D
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEY DR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWINPONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
UTIVE
PA
TH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDING WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ETTY S B U R G WAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
Y
ERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIA WAY
TAMARACK TRL
E
M
B
R
Y AV
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOXAVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONTWAY
A NTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MI LLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
G L A D S T O N ETRL
BRENNAN PATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
ME A D O W L A R K W A Y
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTLN
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
COUNTRYVIEW TRL
ELK RIVER TRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181ST STW
UPPER 182ND ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY KNL
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMIC DR
CLAIRECT
E A G L E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
AV
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIEVIE W TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND ST W
FORMOSAAVE
EU
CLID PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNE TRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE D R
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO R SE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBINLN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D U LCIMERCT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGE WAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXCEPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKSDR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAX
AVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORG ET O W N W AY
CAR ME L T R L
E
UC
LID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIE
R
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
E
N
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RD ST W
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R L I N G T O N PATH
EV
E
R
G
R
E
EN
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
AV
E
EN
G
LE
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DUL UT H CIR
FURY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EV
ERT
O
N
CT
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
E
X
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW
WAY
DOVER CT
LOWER HERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
CA
NAR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O R MOSA CT
CENTURYCT
GO
L
DFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
I
S
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
I
L
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T
T
R
L
EXP
L
O
RER
WAY
CAMBRIA CT
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
U
N
B
A
R
A
V
E
UPPER 179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHC T
ENIGMA WAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRE
TRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PA
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMO N D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEO PATRA
D
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEY DR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWIN PONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
UTIVE
PA
TH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDING WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ET TY SB U R G W AY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
Y
ERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIA WAY
TAMARACK TRL
E
M
B
R
Y AV
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOX AVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONTWAY
ANTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN
MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
GLADSTONETRL
BRENNAN PATH
FESTAL AVE
FIELDCREST AVE
M E A D O W L A R K W A Y
225TH ST W
ASTERBILTL N
205TH ST W
193RDSTW
DUSHANE PKWY
179TH ST W
C OUNTRY VIEW TRL
ELK RIVER TRL
EATON AVE
190TH ST W
170TH ST W
181STSTW
UPPER 182N D ST W
173RD ST WNORTH CREEK DR
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
A
KI
N
R
D
ABBEY
LN
EC
H
O LN
CENTENNIAL DR
CANTON CT
DUNBURY K N L
FLAGSTAFF AVE
GALLEONCIR EVENTIDE WAY
ERIN CT
224TH ST W
DREAMLN
223RD ST W
GEMINI TRL
BRUTUS DR
DYNAMICDR
CLAIRECT
E A GL E WOOD TRL
E
A
S
T
VI
E
W
A
V
E
EUROPA
AV
E
FAIRVIEW LN
ERIN
WAY
FALCON
PATH
EAGLE LN
SUNNYSID
E
DR
13TH ST
PRAIRIE VIE W TRL
206THSTW
CASC A DEDR
EGRET WAY
CHESTERFIELD WAY
FAIRMEADOW WAY
212THSTW
FOXBOROLN
PARKDR
GERDINE PATH
202ND ST W
FORMOSAAVE
EU
CLID PATH
CAMROSEWAY
200TH ST W
FAIRHAVEN AVE
GANDERLN
GAGE AVE
EASTON AVE
FORTUNE TRL
204TH ST W
W
TRL
ALLAS AVE
EASTWOOD AVE
DOVER
DR
ELGIN AVE
EASTLAKE DR
ENGLISH AVE
DRAFTHO R SE BLVD
EVENSONGAVE
EUREKA AVE
FIRESTONEPATH EAGLEVIEW DR
CALGARYTRL
GLANSHAW AVE
F O L S O M P A T H
SHAKESPEARE BLVD
ROBIN LN
GATEWAYDR
FRAZERPATH
FLINT AVE
D U LCIMER CT
198TH ST W
199THSTW
D
E
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
A
T
H
175TH ST W
FIRELIGH T W A Y
EVERESTPATH
FRANCHISE WAY
UPPER 183RD ST W
HERITAGEWAY
EVERHILLAVE
EXCEPTIO
N
A
L
T
R
L
FLUSHINGHILLSC T
ENFIELD WAY
FIVE OAKS DR
FINESSE TRL
FAIRHILLAVE
203RDSTW
F
R
E
E
P
O
R
TWAY
185TH ST W
CLAREMONTDR
EVENFALL AVE
FAIRFAX
AVE
ELKWOOD AVE
ECHO TER
ECHO DR
ELLICE LN
DUNBURY AVE
EVELETH CT
EVELETH AVE
EMBERS AVE
GEORGETOWNWAY
CARM E L T R L
E
UC
LID
S
T
FIRESIDELN
C E NTERFIE
L
D
CT
E
X
C
H
ANGETRL
188TH ST W
B U T T E R N U T T R L
GLA
CIE
R
W
A
Y
CA
M
D
E
N
P
A
TH
E
M
B
RY
LN
EN
C
H
A
N
TED
WAY
D
U
L
U
T
H S
T
174TH ST W
E X C E L C T
183RD STW
191STSTW
ESQUIRE WAY
FRENCH AVE
DE
NALI CT
B U R LI N G T O N P AT H
EV
E
R
G
R
E
EN
T
R
L
178TH ST W
FOREST ST
EMERALD TRL
CATTAIL LN
CANBYCT
F ORFARCT
GL
A
S
G
O
W
AV
E
EN
G
LE
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
FARADAY LN ENCINA PATH
C
E
N
T
U
R
Y
RD
CHANDLER
A
V
E
FOLIAGE AVE
FIREBIRD CT
169TH ST W
197TH ST W
EVEREST TRL
DU L U T H CIR
FURY
CT
EXCELSIOR LN
ERICKSON
P
AT
H
184TH ST W
EV
ERT
O
N
CT
FULDA TRL
ARBOR LN
GALLECT
EWING ST
198TH CT W
E
X
O
D
U
S
A
V
E
ELM ST
14TH ST
FIREBIRD PATHGLASGOW
WAY
DOVER CT
LOWERHERITAGEWAY
CABRILLA WAY
DUNCA
N
C
IR
CAMDENCT
E
S
C
A
L
A
D
E
W
AY
ELLINGTON TRL
EUREKACT
CA
NAR
Y PAT
H
CASTLECT
ROMEO DR
JULIET DR
MACBETH CIR
DUNCAN CT
FALCONAVE
FIELDFARE WAY
201ST ST W
F O R MOSACT
CENTURYCT
GO
L
DFIN
C
H
DR
C
A
R
AV
EL
CT
FONTINA PATH
ENCORE CT
CANTREL WAY
GARR
I
S
O
N
LN
GANNON WAY FLORIN AVE FIRTREEPL
CATTA
I
L
CT
BEAUMONTAVE
ELY AVE
E
N
R
IG
H
T W
A
Y
EDMONTON AVE
EXETER AVE
DENALI WAY
ELMWOOD
CI
R
186TH ST W
E N R IGHTCT
172ND ST W
E
S
C
O
R
T
T
R
L
EXP
L
O
RER
WAY
CAMBRIA C T
EVENINGSTARWAY
EAGLEVIEW LN
FROST CT
D
U
N
B
A
R
A
V
E
UPPER 179TH ST W
CALHOUN CT
ETHELTON AVE
189TH ST W
EUCLID AVE
E
MPEROR CT
EXIRA AVE
DIAMOND PATH
EAVESWAY
FIESTAAVE
E
NHANCE
C
T
CAESAR ST
ENGLISHC T
ENIGMAWAY
203RD C T W
FIRESTONEWAY
211TH ST W
LANGFORDLN
CAMBODIA AVE
EMPIRE
TRL
BISCAYNE AVE
220TH
ST
W
FONTANA PA
T
H
LOWER 183RD ST W
DESMO N D CT
KNUTSEN DR
UPPER 204TH ST W
C
Y
P
R
E
S
S
D
R
EXLEY AVE
FINCH PATH
CLEOPATRA
D
R
177TH ST W
EUCLID WAY
F
R
UITWOOD
PATH
210TH ST W
E
S
S
E
N
C
E
T
R
L
GALERY DR
FAIR ISLE PATH
DULANEY DR
EXPORT TRL
FAIRMONT AVE
EVENSTONDR
EXCALIBUR TRL
EVENINGTER
192ND ST W
CANTON CIR
GAGE WAY
176TH ST W
TWINPONDCIR
194TH ST W
ESTES PATH
E
X
E
C
UTIVE
PA
TH
EXCLUSIVE PATH
DYLAN DR
NORTH CREEK LN
CHEVELLE AVE
CHILI AVE
FIELDING WAY
D
A
W
S
O
N L
N
LOWER 182ND ST W
G ET TYSB U R G WAY
ELDORADO WAY
D
E
V
R
IE
P
ATH
EASTOAKS
DR
COLORADO AVED
Y
ERSPASS
MUNICIPALD R
ESTATEAVE
GARCIAWAY
TAMAR ACKTRL
E
M
B
R
Y AV
E
ELKRIDGE TRL
196TH ST W
DUPONT WAY
EQUINOX AVE
FAIRGREEN AVE
BEAUMONTWAY
ANTHONYDR
ESSEX AVE
BERRING AVE
230TH ST W
220TH ST W
H AMLET
CIR
EMPIRE TOWNSHIP
LAKEVILLE
EUREKA TOWNSHIP
HILL DEE PARK
DAISY
KNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVE
PARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVER
PARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTY
ESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILL
PARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLE
CREEK
PARK
SCHMITZ
MAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEW
PARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTH
CREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIE
PINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y
A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DE
E
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
A
B C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
CS
A
H
3
1
/
P
I
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
CR 64/ 195th ST W
180TH ST W
187TH ST W
185TH ST W
C R 6 4 / 1 9 5 T H S T W
KEY
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAILS
EXISTING CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
EXISTING GREENWAYS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)
PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL / EMPLOYMENT AREAS
WATER
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/3/19
0 10.5
Miles
DRAFT 5/13/19
Figure 3.1 Draft Network Plan
3-4
roadway 8-10’ paved trail
10’
Neighborhood Trail Recommendations
Figure 3.2 Typical Neighborhood Trail Section
Network Plan Elements
the following network Plan elements are shown in the draft
network Plan.
Neighborhood Trails
neighborhood trails are multi-use paved trails that connect
residential areas to local parks and to the connector trail
network. these trails exist today within established Farmington
neighborhoods and are generally aligned with low-volume
roadways. these trails are intended for use by pedestrians and
bicyclists. Future neighborhood trails are indicated in alignment
with the 2040 comprehensive Plan, and future developments are
required to build trail connections in new neighborhoods according
to these general alignments.
»8-10’ wide asphalt-paved trails, to meet
neighborhood development standards set by the
city of Farmington
»curb ramps at all intersection crossings
»trail amenities such as lighting, wayfinding,
and benches to be determined as needed
by neighborhood association or per city of
Farmington recommendation
»Future funding/implementation: owner/developer
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-5 netWork Plan
connector trails are multi-use paved trails that connect longer
distances across the city. connector trails are generally in alignment
with higher volume roadways, such as Pilot knob road, aikin
road, and Highway 50. these trails are intended to serve as major
connections to schools, parks, commercial, employment and civic
areas, as well as provide connections to neighboring communities.
connector trails, in combination with Farmington greenways,
create a legible, continuous system that provides high-quality
trail experience with a rough grid network connection at half mile
intervals throughout the entire city.
»trail lighting (lower, pedestrian-scaled lighting or
bollard-style lighting)
»community wayfinding at key intersections,
directional signage to key community destinations
»High visibility crosswalk markings and curb ramps
at roadway crossings
»Benches/seating as needed
»maximum separation between the roadway and
trail for added comfort/safety for trail users
»Year-round availability (snow clearing) performed
or enforced by the city (phased approach)
»minimum 8’ (preferable 10’+) width should be
maintained, with potential lane markings
»Future developments that are adjacent to or
contain plans for future connector trail network
segments should align future trails as closely as
possible as the plan shows, with the understanding
that these trail segments are part of a larger city-
wide trail network.
»Where feasible, consideration of grade-separated
crossings at intersecting high-volume roadways
»Future funding/implementation: developers, city
of Farmington, regional and local trail/srts grant
funding, dakota county, mndot
Connector Trails
Connector Trail Recommendations
roadway 8-10’ paved trail
10’
pedestrian-scaled
lighting
community
waynding
Figure 3.3 Typical Connector Trail Section
3-6
Greenways
greenways are multi-use paved trails that are located in scenic,
natural, parkland, open space, or undeveloped areas. greenways are
primarily located independent of an existing roadway. these trails
are intended to provide recreational opportunities for bicyclists and
pedestrians, with opportunities to connect to the rural or natural
landscape. regional trails, such as the Vermillion river greenway
and the north creek greenway exist today in Farmington. this
plan proposes and supports the continued completion of these
trail networks, as well as introduces a few key greenway segments
that could provide direct connections to local schools. Farmington’s
greenways, in combination with connector trails, create a legible,
continuous system that provides high-quality trail experience with a
rough grid network connection at half mile intervals throughout the
entire city.
Greenway Recommendations
MILE
8-10’ trail
10’
interpretive
sign
MILE
8-10’ trail
10’
interpretive
sign
Figure 3.4 Typical Greenway Section
»trailhead locations with on-street or dedicated
parking
»trail identification (name) and signage at trail
access points and at key intersections
»minimum 8’ (preferable 10’+) width should be
maintained with a 2’ buffer (mowed/cleared area)
on either side of the trail
»interpretive or educational signage at key
locations to inform trail users about local
attractions, native plants and wildlife habitat, or
cultural/historical markers
»Benches and seating at key vistas or viewpoints.
Preferably located every half-mile along the trail
»Where feasible, consideration of grade-separated
crossings at intersecting high-volume roadways
»emergency call boxes in remote locations
»Year-round availability (snow clearing) performed
or enforced by the city (phased approach)
»Future funding/implementation: city of
Farmington, state/regional/local trail grant
funding, outdoor/recreational trail grant funding,
dakota county
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-7 netWork Plan
On-Street Bikeway Recommendations
On-Street Bikeways
on-street Bikeways are signed bike routes that provide key
connections and fill network gaps in the connector trail network.
on-street Bikeways are located along existing roadways with low
volume traffic, wide right-of-way widths, and low instances of on-
street parking. today, it is understood that bicyclists are able to use
any roadway in Farmington, provided that the bicyclists follow the
rules of the road. For the purposes of this plan, on-street bikeways
are not intended to be striped with dedicated bike lanes. However,
with future increased use, the city of Farmington may consider
upgrading these roadways with dedicated bike lanes upon future
evaluation.
Figure 3.5 Typical On-Street Bikeway Section
roadway + on-street bikeway sidewalksidewalk
10’
bikeway
sign
»Bikeway signage, to be visible to drivers and
bicyclists, located at key intersections and along
roadways
»roadway markings, where necessary
»consistent street lighting throughout bikeway
»Future funding/implementation: city of
Farmington
3-8
roadway sidewalksidewalk
10’
pedestrian-scaled
lighting seating
Figure 3.6 Typical Activity Area Section
Sidewalks + Activity Areas
sidewalks are concrete paved walkways, intended for use by
pedestrians to connect within residential areas and commercial
areas. sidewalks are essential in urbanized areas to allow for
people of all abilities to gain access to businesses, schools, and
community destinations. in Farmington, sidewalks are required
in new developments along one side of the street. sidewalk
connections exist in some parts of the existing neighborhoods north
of downtown, and a nearly complete network of sidewalks exist (on
both sides of the street) in downtown and in the neighborhoods
east of tH3. a number of activity areas have been identified in
Farmington; these are areas where there is a high demand for
increased pedestrian safety and comfort.
Sidewalk + Activity Area Recommendations
»on-going effort to complete sidewalk network
gaps
»enforcement by the city of Farmington for
businesses and residents to keep sidewalks clear in
the winter
»Pedestrian-scaled lighting
»curb ramps at all intersections
»High visibility crosswalk markings + forward stop
bars at major intersections in the downtown
commercial area
»Wayfinding and distance markers to community
destinations
»seating, planters, and placemaking elements
located within commercial areas
»sidewalk replacement/repair schedule as needed
»Future funding/implementation: Business owners,
property owners, city of Farmington, streetscape/
pedestrian/urban design grant opportunities
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-9 netWork Plan
Intersection Treatments
a number of intersections have been identified for future treatments
to improve crossing and visibility for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Below are recommended treatments at each intersection (keyed
on the draft network Plan). to the left are examples of some of the
treatments recommended below.
Reduced curb radii: slows traffic at turns and
decreases the distance required of pedestrians to
cross intersections.
User-activated signal: pedestrians use a button
to activate a lights, signalling to vehicles to stop
and yield.
Pedestrian crossing signs: to be placed at the
approach of roundabouts, alerting drivers of
pedestrian crossings
High visibility crosswalks: make pedestrians
more visible within crosswalks.
Forward stop bars: increase buffer between
stopped vehicles and crosswalks at intersections
Pilot knob Rd and Upper 182nd St
»High visibility crosswalk markings
»Forward stop bars
»Potential for decreased curb radii
»leading Pedestrian interval for ped walk signal
»intersection was identified in the dakota county Bike Ped Plan for
potential grade separated crossing
»requires coordination with dakota county
A
B
C
D
E
F
CR 64/195th Street and Pilot knob Rd
»‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach
to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk
»requires coordination with dakota county
CR 64/195th Street and Akin Rd
»‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach
to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk
»requires coordination with dakota county
CR 64/195th Street and Highway 3
»‘Pedestrian crossing’ signs to be installed on the right side of approach
to intersection at pedestrian crosswalk
»requires coordination with dakota county + mndot
CSAH 50 and Akin Rd/Denmark Ave
»High visibility crosswalk markings
»Forward stop bars
»requires coordination with dakota county
(Future) Vermillion Greenway and Highway 3
»High visibility crosswalk markings
»Forward stop bars
»requires coordination with dakota county
3-10
Grade-separated crossings: trail overpasses or
tunnels that allow trail users to avoid crossing
intersections with vehicular or rail traffic.
Pedestrian Islands: concrete barriers or raised
curbs that provide protection for pedestrians
at crosswalks. Pedestrian islands decrease the
distance required for pedestrians to cross a busy
roadway.
G
H
I
J
k
willow St and 8th Street (at Dairy Queen/Highway 3)
»High visibility crosswalk crossing Willow street, to be coordinated with
future shared use path aligned with Highway 3
Elm St and Highway 3
»High visibility crosswalks (existing)
»Forward stop bars
»leading pedestrian interval / signal countdown
»improve pedestrian island
»requires coordination with mndot
Spruce St and Highway 3
»Potential location for future user-activated signal, such as rrFB or
HaWk signal
»requires high visibility crosswalks
»requires lowered speed limit to 35mph or lower along Highway 3
»requires coordination with mndot
Beech St/Maple St and Highway 3
»Potential location for future user-activated signal, such as rrFB or
HaWk signal, to connect students to Farmington elementary school
»requires high visibility crosswalks
»requires lowered speed limit to 35mph or lower along Highway 3
»requires coordination with mndot
CR 50/220th St and Highway 3
»High visibility crosswalks (existing)
»Forward stop bars
»leading pedestrian interval
»Pedestrian crossing to connect to future trail connection east of
Highway 3
»requires coordination with mndot
Leading pedestrian intervals: updated signal
timing allows for pedestrians to cross a roadway
before vehicles. This allows pedestrians the ability
to get a head start on crossing the intersection
while all traffic is stopped.
0-7 seconds 7+ seconds
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-11 netWork Plan
System Recommendations
the following system recommendations have been developed to
augment and support the network Plan:
1. Trail alignments within new developments may vary from
the Bike + Ped Network Plan and the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan, but should generally follow the alignments shown
to connect to adjacent trails, per guidance from City of
Farmington planning, engineering and parks staff.
»Future trails are shown in the 2040 comprehensive Plan (2018).
these trails are also shown in the Bike + Ped network Plan
(2019), along with future trails and sidewalks per the downtown
redevelopment Plan (2016). in general, new developments in
Farmington are required to include sidewalks and trails, per the
city of Farmington development code. it is important that these
new trails and sidewalks connect to adjacent and/or existing trails
and sidewalks to contribute to a continuous and comfortable
bike and pedestrian network, with neighborhoods that are well
connected to other neighborhoods and destinations throughout
the city.
2. The City of Farmington will be responsible for winter snow
removal along Connector and Greenway Trails as designated
in the Bike + Ped Network Plan.
»the connector trail network is intended to serve the largest
number of people throughout the year to connect residents and
visitors across the city to important community destinations such
as parks, schools, and commercial areas. greenways are intended
to provide recreational connections to scenic and natural areas.
By committing to year-round trail access, the city of Farmington
is extending the use of their existing network, while providing
opportunities for people with disabilities, children, seniors,
and others to choose walking or biking as a viable mode of
transportation year-round.
»today, much of the existing connector trail and existing
greenway trail network is cleared year-round by the city of
Farmington, with four levels of plowing priorities. downtown
sidewalks and the 195th street trail are first priority, with trails
leading to schools and/or bus stops as second priority. outdoor
rinks are third priority and other trail loops are fourth priority. as
this system functions today, generally existing connector trails are
first or second priority, and greenways are fourth priority. as new
trails are constructed, the city will need to evaluate the plowing
priority for new segments.
»Future evaluation of this recommendation may lead to extending
city-sponsored snow removal for activity areas.
3-12
»today, all Farmington residents are responsible for clearing of
snow and ice for sidewalks and trails within their property; future
evaluation of this recommendation may lead to changes in this
city-wide policy.
3. All Farmington Schools will be connected to trail and/or
sidewalk facilities to ensure Safe Routes to Schools. The City
of Farmington will coordinate with the Farmington School
District to ensure bicycle and pedestrian connections are
continued to each school’s main entryway.
»today, schools in Farmington are accessible by biking and walking
to varying degrees; some Farmington schools are located where
there are significant challenges to walking and biking to school by
students. the network Plan prioritizes connections to all schools
in Farmington through future trail and sidewalk connections, as
well as enhanced intersection treatments.
»events at schools, such as athletic events or performances draw
an increased amount of vehicular traffic and on-street parking
near schools. to accommodate safe roadway and parking lot
access for pedestrians and bicyclists, special consideration
should be made with high visibility crosswalk markings and
other enhanced safety measures beyond the immediate school
boundary.
»the city will encourage all schools to participate in safe routes
to school program, and participate in safe routes to school
planning and implementation where possible.
4. Establish pedestrian priority zones to support design
standards that encourage walking in destination-filled
locations. These locations are noted in the Network Plan as
Activity Areas, and include:
»downtown Farmington
»emerging activity centers (to be determined with future
development)
»Within the activity areas, it is important to provide a continuous
and comfortable network for pedestrians, to allow movement
between clusters of destinations, such as parks, local businesses,
and civic centers. today, downtown Farmington has an
established grid street network that lends itself well to pedestrian
connections, however there are gaps in sidewalks and trails
today, and the railroad poses a barrier to east-west travel. in the
future, as roadways are re-constructed and improved in activity
areas, sidewalks, trails, and other pedestrian amenities should be
considered within the design.
»continue to establish rambling river Park and the depot Way
art walk as an “active gateway” to the city and enhance their
connection to downtown Farmington.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
3-13 netWork Plan
5. Consider enhanced safety measures for Connector and
Greenway Trails at all roadway crossings where traffic
volumes are high or where safety for all roadway and trail
users is a concern.
»High-volume roadways are generally defined have more than
10,000 vehicles per day.
»safety measures for connector and greenway trails at these
intersections may include:
-Grade-separated crossings such as tunnels or bridges
-High-visibility crosswalks
-User-activated signals or signal-timing upgrades (Leading
Pedestrian Intervals)
-Increased signage
»Future intersection upgrades should be coordinated with the
appropriate agencies and may need further study to determine
the appropriate safety measures.
6. Improve communication of the bike and ped network.
»develop a coordinated wayfinding and signage strategy to
communicate priority and greenway trail networks
»create and post updated trail and bikeway routes using city
communications
7. Develop encouragement and educational programs that
promote a culture of biking and walking in Farmington.
»Work with rambling river center to develop walking and biking
clubs for seniors and families
»expand the bicycle fleet in use today by the Farmington school
district to support programming developed by the rambling
river center, or community education
»Work with the Farmington Police department to host bike rodeos
or safety demonstrations at community events
»coordinate an open streets event in Farmington where a block
or two of roadway is closed to vehicle traffic for an afternoon or
day and outdoor community events are hosted.
»Promote bike racks at local businesses and civic buildings,
and provide information through the chamber of commerce to
promote bicycle-friendly business practices.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
CHAPTER 4
Implementation
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-2 Implementation Plan
4-2 Implementation Recommendations
4-4 Phasing Strategy
4-12 Operations + Maintenance
4-13 Funding Strategies
4-1 imPlementation
4-2
Implementation Plan
the Bike + Ped Plan for the city of Farmington outlines goals for the
walking and biking network and system plan for the next 10 years.
the implementation Plan focuses on how to transform the plan
into reality. First, some general implementation recommendations
are outlined, which are intended to provide guidance for policy
and coordination of implementation efforts. a phasing strategy
is outlined, which breaks tasks down into priority, on-going, and
long-term projects. next, a breakdown of projected costs for capital
projects as well as maintenance and operations are outlined. Finally,
a number of funding resources are identified in this chapter.
Implementation Recommendations
the following recommendations have been developed to assist with
policy and implementation of the plan:
1. Coordinate with other agencies (MnDOT, Dakota County,
Empire Township, Lakeville, Eureka Township, Castle Rock,
Farmington School District, Community Ed) to incorporate
Farmington Bike + Ped Plan elements into their planning and
areas of responsibility.
»an annual bike + ped planning meeting could be hosted by the
city of Farmington to evaluate and identify collaborative projects.
»the city of Farmington and dakota county have a history of
working collaboratively on the design and construction of trails
and sidewalks within dakota county right-of-ways. in the last 10
years, the city and county have worked together to develop
approved regional greenway master plans that will connect the
city to the county’s regional park and trail system.
-Today, 30% (13 miles) of the existing trail network in Farmington
is within Dakota County right-of-way.
-In the planning process for the Bike + Ped Plan, Dakota County
Transportation staff worked with the project team to identify
specific intersection treatments at round-abouts on county
roadways.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-3 imPlementation
»state Highway 3 has been identified as a significant barrier to
cross-city travel by bicyclists and pedestrians, both through this
planning effort as well as through the recent Highway 3 corridor
Plan.
-In the planning process for the Bike + Ped Plan, MnDOT
Transportation staff worked with the project team to identify
future trail connections along Highway 3, as well as the potential
for a lowered speed limit along Highway 3 through Farmington.
With future decreased speed limits, there is possibility of
implementing user-activated and high-visibility crosswalks to
connect bicyclists and pedestrians across Highway 3.
2. Regularly evaluate progress of the implementation of the
Plan.
»annually update city gis files
»annually review progress on recommendations
»determine projects to include in ciP, projects to pursue grant
funding
»this plan is intended to provide guidance for the next 10 years;
consider a Bike + Ped Plan update in coordination with the 2050
comprehensive Plan update.
3. Consider an on-going Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee,
potentially alongside the City Parks Commission
»role to assist with implementation and evaluation of plan
elements
»consider rotating members, terms of service, role/charge, diverse
viewpoints.
4-4
Phasing Strategy
identifying priorities and demonstrating visible, measurable progress
is essential to implement the plan to maintain momentum to reach
longer-term goals.
Priority Projects
recommended priority projects have been identified through
community outreach, as well as with input from the BPP committee
and city staff. these priority projects are projected to have the
biggest impact for improving safety and comfort for pedestrian and
bicycle movement in Farmington. Priority projects are intended to
be completed or have substantial progress towards completion in
the next 1-5 years. see Figure 4.1 and table 4.1 for a keyed plan and
table of Priority Projects.
»intersection treatments:
-Coordinate with Dakota County Transportation to install high
visibility crosswalk markings and pedestrian crossing signs at
the approach of round-about intersections along 195th Street.
-Coordinate with Dakota County Transportation to address
intersection treatments at Pilot Knob Road / Upper 195th Street
and at Akin Road/CSAH 50.
-Coordinate with MnDOT to implement enhanced intersection
treatments at Elm Street and TH3.
»tH3 Pedestrian safety and connector trail:
-A trail connection along TH 3 from 205th Street to the southern
City limits along with enhanced safety for pedestrian crossings
at a number of intersections along TH 3 in Farmington have been
strongly identified by the community as priority projects.
-Coordination with MnDOT is key to moving forward. While it may
not be feasible to construct the TH3 trail in the next 1-3 years
due to lack of funding, progress can be made towards working
with MnDOT to lower the speed limit through this area, which
will pave the way for implementation of intersection treatments,
such as user-activated signals at Spruce Street and Maple Street.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-5 imPlementation
»connector trail and on-street Bikeways within downtown
Farmington:
-On-Street Bikeway on Willow Street and 4th Street
-On-Street Bikeway along 205th Street (funded and planned for
implementation 2019)
-Connector Trail from Akin Road and CSAH 50/Denmark
Avenue to Spruce Street, Spruce Street from Denmark Ave to
TH 3 (Denmark Ave to Division Street funded and planned for
implementation 2021/2022)
»connector trail and greenway trail connections
-Connector Trail along Flagstaff Ave from 195th Street to CSAH
50) to serve Farmington High School, including connection to
200th Street south of Meadowview Elementary School
-Connector Trail missing segment on west side of Pilot Knob
Road south of 197th Street (Identified by Dakota County as a
High Priority Trail Gap)
-North Creek Greenway connection to Lakeville and boardwalk
section at North Creek Park (funded and planned construction
for 2021)
»Wayfinding Plan
-Complete a city-wide wayfinding and signage plan to correspond
with the Bike + Ped Network Plan
-To include locations and design of wayfinding
»educational and encouragement Programs
-Work with Rambling River Center to develop walking and biking
clubs for seniors and families
-Expand the bicycle fleet in use today by the Farmington School
District to support programming developed by the Rambling
River Center, or Community Education
-Work with the Farmington Police Department to host bike rodeos
or safety demonstrations at community events
-Coordinate an Open Streets event in Farmington where a block or
two of roadway is closed to vehicle traffic for an afternoon or day
and outdoor community events are hosted.
-Promote bike racks at local businesses and civic buildings,
and provide information through the chamber of commerce to
promote bicycle=friendly business practices.
Figure 4.1 Phasing Plan: Priority Projects
4-6
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEWELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HILL DEE PARK
DAISYKNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVEPARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVERPARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILLPARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLECREEK
PARK
SCHMITZMAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEWPARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTHCREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIEPINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DEE
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
EXISTING TRAILSPRIORITY PROJECTS
PHASING PLAN KEY
ON-GOING PROJECTS
LONG-TERM PROJECTS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)WATER
PARKS
SCHOOLS
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/6/19
0 10.5 Miles
1 1
1
2
3 4
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
9
10
11
12
12
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-7 imPlementation
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
1 Intersection treatments at round-abouts
along 195th Street Dakota County $10,000 - $12,000
(4) signs with
pavement
markings x 3
intersections
General Funds (Dakota County)
2 Intersection treatment at Pilot Knob
Road/Upper 195th Street Dakota County $2,000 - $5,000
pavement
markings, curb
extensions
General Funds (Dakota County), State Aid
Funds
3 Intersection treatment at Akin
Road/CSAH 50 Dakota County $500 - $1,000 pavement
markings
General Funds (Dakota County), State Aid
Funds
4 Intersection treatments at Elm Street
and TH3 MnDOT $2,000 - $3,000
pavement
markings, signal
timing
General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds
5 TH 3 Connector Trail MnDOT $630,000 - $850,000 2.0 miles General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds
6
Intersection Treatments on TH3 (Willow
Street, Spruce Street, Maple/Beech
Street, CSAH 50)
MnDOT, Dakota
County $6,000 -
pavement
markings, signal
timing, curb
extensions, user-
activated signals
General Funds (MnDOT), State Aid Funds
7 On-Street Bikeway on Willow and 4th
Streets 4,000 - $5,000 6,600 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
8 On-Street Bikeway on 205th Street Empire Township n/a (funded)$1,600 LF n/a (funded)
9
Connector Trail from Aikin Road/CSAH
50 to Spruce Street, Spruce Street from
Denmark Ave to TH3)
Farmington Public
Schools $450,000 - $600,000 7,500 LF
General Funds (City of Farmington);
partially funded and planned for
construction in 2021/2022, Local Trail
Connections Grant, Regional Solicitation
Grant
10
Connector Trail on Flagstaff Avenue
from 195th Street to CSAH 50,
Connection to 200th Street
Farmington Public
Schools
$1,200,000 -
$1,600,000 20,000 LF
General Funds (City of Farmington) Safe
Routes to School Infrastructure Grant,
Regional Solicitation Grant, Local Trail
Connections Grant
11 Connector Trail segment on Pilot Knob
Road south of 197th Street Dakota County $84,000 - $112,000 1,400 LF General Funds, State Aid Funds
12
North Creek Greenway Connection to
Lakeville and boardwalk section at North
Creek Park
Dakota County n/a (funded)
2.1 miles,
boardwalk
connection
Funded through Regional Solicitation
Grants for implementation 2021/2022
13 Wayfinding Plan Dakota County $15,000 - $25,000
Plan to guide
wayfinding
locations and
design
SHIP Funds, General Funds (City of
Farmington), Regional Solicitation Grant
14 Educational and Encouragement
Programs
Rambling River Center,
Community
Education, Farmington
Police Department,
Farmington Public
Schools, Farmington
Chamber of
Commerce
n/a n/a
SHIP Funding, General Gunds (City of
Farmington), Grant funding, Safe Routes to
School
Priority Projects Capital Costs
Table 4.1 Capital Costs: Priority Projects
4-8
On-Going Projects
the following projects have been identified as medium-priority, to
be completed as funding or opportunities become available. see
Figure 4.2 and table 4.2 for a keyed plan and table of on-going
Projects.
»connector trail, on-street Bikeways, and greenway trails around
downtown Farmington:
-On-Street Bikeways along 1st Street from Rambling River Park
to CR 50, 12th Street and Spruce Street in Prairie View Park,
Centennial/Evergreen Knoll Park
-Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th Street, CR 50, Vermillion
River Trail, Elm Street/3rd Street/Pine Street
»other trails and on-street Bikeways:
-On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue to 195th Street
-On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue, English Avenue, 185th
Street W and Upper 182nd Street W
-Greenway Trail through Farmington Preserve Park
-Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park from Pilot Knob Road
-Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to tunnel under 195th
Street
»sidewalk and activity area improvements in downtown
Farmington
-To be completed as roadways are improved/reconstructed
»trail recommendations:
-High visibility crosswalks, curb extensions, and forward stop
bars at Connector and Greenway Trail intersections
-Lighting, seating, and interpretation along Connector and
Greenway segments
»complete safe routes to school Plans for all schools in the
district
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-9 imPlementation
long-Term Projects
the following projects have been identified as long-term
projects. these projects will require larger fundraising efforts and
collaborative planning with dakota county, neighboring townships,
and future development. see Figure 4.2 and table 4.2 for a keyed
plan and table of long-term Projects.
»lake marion, north creek, and Vermillion river greenway
segments in Farmington (in coordination with dakota county)
»greenway loop from northwest Farmington to future north creek
greenway
»connector trail extensions on Flagstaff avenue north of 195th
street and south of csaH 50, eastview/eaton avenue, 200th
street, 190th street W, 203rd street, diamond Path, and future
roadways in northeast Farmington as development occurs
Figure 4.2 Phasing Plan: On-Going and Long-Term Projects
4-10
FARMINGTON
HIGH SCHOOL
AIKIN ROAD ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
LEVI P. DODGE
MIDDLE SCHOOL
RIVERVIEWELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
FARMINGTON
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ROBERT
BOECKMAN MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MEADOWVIEW
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
HILL DEE PARK
DAISYKNOLL PARK
HILLVIEW
PARK
LAKE
JULIA
PARK
FARMINGTON
PRESERVEPARK
FAIR
HILLS
PARK
VERMILLION
GROVE PARK
PINE
KNOLL
PARK
RAMBLING
RIVERPARK
WESTVIEW
PARK
EVERGREEN
KNOLL PARK
DAKOTA COUNTYESTATES PARK
NORTH
CREEK
PARK
FAIRHILL
GREENWAY
TROY
HILLPARK
MEADOWVIEW
PARK
MIDDLECREEK
PARK
SCHMITZMAKI ARENA
PRAIRIE
VIEWPARK
MARIGOLD PARK
TAMARACK
PARK
SILVER
SPRINGS PARK
NORTHCREEK
GREENWAY
JIM BELL
PARK AND
PRESERVE
PRAIRIE
WATERWAY
GREENWAY
PRAIRIEPINES
PARK
MAIN
PINE
WILLOW ST
205TH
209TH
CAPRI ST
208TH
ELM ST
OAK ST
SPRUCE
WALNU
220TH
CENTENNIAL DR
HERITAGE WAY 223RD ST
12
T
H
S
T
HW
Y
3
4T
H
S
T
6T
H
S
T
1S
T
S
T
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
AK
I
N
R
D
PI
L
O
T
K
N
O
B
R
D
HW
Y
3
1
TH
3
/
C
H
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
W
HIGHWAY 50
MAPLE
CSAH 50 / 212TH
BEECH ST
V E R M I L LIO N RIVER
V E R MILLION RIV E R G R E E N W A Y A
K
I
N
R
D
E
A
S
T
V
I
E
W
203RD
200TH
EVERH I L L A V E
FLAGSTAFF
E
N
G
L
I
S
H AVE
19 3 R D 1 9 3 R D S T W
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EN
G
L
I
S
H
A
V
E
EM
B
E
R
S
A
V
E
E
M
B
E
R
S A
V
E
U P P E R 182ND ST
D
U
N
B
U
R
Y
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H C
R
E
E
K
R
E
GI
O
N
AL TR
A
I
L
DEE
R
B
R
O
O
K
E
P
ATH199TH ST W
L A KE M A R I ON G R E E N W A Y
EXISTING TRAILSPRIORITY PROJECTS
PHASING PLAN KEY
ON-GOING PROJECTS
LONG-TERM PROJECTS
PROPOSED CONNECTOR TRAILS
PROPOSED GREENWAYS
PROPOSED ON-STREET
BIKEWAYS
ACTIVITY AREA
EXISTING GRADE-SEPARATED
TRAIL CROSSING (BRIDGE OR
TUNNEL)WATER
PARKS
SCHOOLS
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
PROPOSED INTERSECTION
TREATMENTS
DRAFT FARMINGTON BIKE + PED NETWORK PLAN
6/6/19
0 10.5 Miles
1 1 1
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1013
14
15
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
1
On-Street Bikeways on 1st Street, 12th
Street and Spruce Street, and in the
Centennial neighborhood
Downtown Businesses $7,000 - $9,000 11,400 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
2
Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th
Street, CR 50, Beech Street near
Farmington Elementary and Middle
Schools
Farmington School
District $700,000 - $950,000 11,800 LF
Safe Routes to School Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
3 Connector Trail on Vermillion River Trail,
Willow Street Downtown Businesses $500,000 - $720,000 9,100 LF Local Trail Connections Grant,
Development
4 Connector Trail on Elm Street, 3rd Street,
Pine Street near Rambling River Park $195,000 - $270,000 3350 LF
Local Trail Connections Grant, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington)
5 On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue $2,000 3000 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
6
On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue,
English Avenue, 185th Street W and
Upper 182nd Street W
$10,500 15,800 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
7 Greenway Trail through Farmington
Preserve Park $49,000 - $66,000 820 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
8 Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park $114000 - $152,000 1,900 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
9 Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to
tunnel under 195th Street Dakota County $186,000 - $248,000 3,100 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, General Funds
(City of Farmington), MnDNR Natural and
Scenic Area Grant
10 Sidewalk and Activity Area
improvements in Downtown Farmington Downtown Businesses General Funds (City of Farmington),
Regional Solicitation Grant
11
Trail Recommendations (intersection
treatments, lighting, seating,
interpretation)
Dakota County,
Farmington School
District, Downtown
Businesses
Regional Solicitation Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
12 Safe Routes to School Plans MnDOT, Farmington
School District
MnDOT Safe Routes to School Planning
Assistance
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
13 Lake Marion Greenway Dakota County $875,000 - $1.2M 14,600 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
14 North Creek Greenway Dakota County $270,000 - $360,000 4,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
15 Vermillion River Greenway Dakota County,
Empire Township $430,000 - $575,000 7,200 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
16 Farmington Greenway Loop
Developers,
Farmington Public
Schools
$2.0M - 2.8M 34,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington), Developers
17
Connector Trail Extensions (Flagstaff Ave,
Eastview/Eaton Ave, 200th Street, 190th
Street, 203rd Street, Diamond Path,
future roadways in northeast Farmington
Developers, adjacent
Townships and cities,
MnDOT
$3.2M - $4.2M 53,000 LF
Developers, Local Trail Connection grants,
General Funds (City of Farmington,
MnDOT)
On-Going Projects Capital Costs
Long-Term Projects Capital Costs
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
1
On-Street Bikeways on 1st Street, 12th
Street and Spruce Street, and in the
Centennial neighborhood
Downtown Businesses $7,000 - $9,000 11,400 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
2
Connector Trails on Maple Street, 6th
Street, CR 50, Beech Street near
Farmington Elementary and Middle
Schools
Farmington School
District $700,000 - $950,000 11,800 LF
Safe Routes to School Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
3 Connector Trail on Vermillion River Trail,
Willow Street Downtown Businesses $500,000 - $720,000 9,100 LF Local Trail Connections Grant,
Development
4 Connector Trail on Elm Street, 3rd Street,
Pine Street near Rambling River Park $195,000 - $270,000 3350 LF
Local Trail Connections Grant, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington)
5 On-Street Bikeway on Everhill Avenue $2,000 3000 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
6
On-Street Bikeways on Embers Avenue,
English Avenue, 185th Street W and
Upper 182nd Street W
$10,500 15,800 LF General Funds (City of Farmington)
7 Greenway Trail through Farmington
Preserve Park $49,000 - $66,000 820 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
8 Greenway Trail to Daisy Knoll Park $114000 - $152,000 1,900 LF General Funds (City of Farmington),
MnDNR Outdorr Recreation Grant
9 Greenway Trail from North Creek Park to
tunnel under 195th Street Dakota County $186,000 - $248,000 3,100 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, General Funds
(City of Farmington), MnDNR Natural and
Scenic Area Grant
10 Sidewalk and Activity Area
improvements in Downtown Farmington Downtown Businesses General Funds (City of Farmington),
Regional Solicitation Grant
11
Trail Recommendations (intersection
treatments, lighting, seating,
interpretation)
Dakota County,
Farmington School
District, Downtown
Businesses
Regional Solicitation Grants, Local Trail
Connections, General Funds (City of
Farmington)
12 Safe Routes to School Plans MnDOT, Farmington
School District
MnDOT Safe Routes to School Planning
Assistance
Map
Key Project Description Potential
Collaborators Estimated Costs Length/Qty Potential Funding Strategy
13 Lake Marion Greenway Dakota County $875,000 - $1.2M 14,600 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
14 North Creek Greenway Dakota County $270,000 - $360,000 4,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
15 Vermillion River Greenway Dakota County,
Empire Township $430,000 - $575,000 7,200 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (Dakota County, City of Farmington)
16 Farmington Greenway Loop
Developers,
Farmington Public
Schools
$2.0M - 2.8M 34,500 LF
Regional Solicitation Grants, MnDNR
Natural and Scenic Area Grant, General
Funds (City of Farmington), Developers
17
Connector Trail Extensions (Flagstaff Ave,
Eastview/Eaton Ave, 200th Street, 190th
Street, 203rd Street, Diamond Path,
future roadways in northeast Farmington
Developers, adjacent
Townships and cities,
MnDOT
$3.2M - $4.2M 53,000 LF
Developers, Local Trail Connection grants,
General Funds (City of Farmington,
MnDOT)
On-Going Projects Capital Costs
Long-Term Projects Capital Costs
Table 4.2 Capital Costs: On-Going Projects
4-11 imPlementation
Quantity
(Miles)
Quantity
(Feet)
Annual O + M
Cost
Total O+M Annual
Cost Capital Cost
Total Projected
Capital /
Replacement
Costs
Estimated
Life Notes
Existing Asphalt Trails 46.8 Miles 247,104 Feet $1,200 - $2,000 /
Mile $56,160 - $93,600 $60 / LF 14.8 M 30 years Assumes trails 8' wide or less
Proposed Asphalt Trails 35.9 Miles 189,663 Feet $1,200 - $2,000 /
Mile $43,080 - $71,800 $80 / LF $15.2 M 30 years Assumes 10' wide trails
Proposed On-Street
Bikeways 7.9 Miles 41,832 Feet $3,500 / Mile $27,650 30 years Assumes (2) signs every 600'
Existing Sidewalks 31.0 Miles 163,502 Feet $45 / LF $7.4M 15-30 years Assumes a 6' wide sidewalk
Table 4.4 General Operations, Maintenance and Capital Costs
4-12
Operations + Maintenance
today, the city of Farmington maintains 46.8 miles of asphalt trails,
along with 31.0 miles of sidewalks, 1.5 miles of natural surface
trails, boardwalks and pedestrian bridges. these facilities all vary in
anticipated life cycle, and required maintenance.
Snow/Ice Removal
snow and ice removal are key to providing safe access to trails and
sidewalks year-round. in Farmington, residents are responsible for
maintaining clear paths for sidewalks and trails adjacent to or within
their property. the city of Farmington clears trails, sidewalks, and
outdoor rinks that are indicated on the snow removal Plan. this
plan prioritizes sidewalks in downtown, the trail along 195th street,
and trails leading to schools and bus stops.
this plan recommends integrating all newly constructed trails into
the snow removal Plan as necessary. connector and greenway
trails are recommended for future clearing/plowing by the city. an
evaluation of the snow removal Plan should be performed annually
to revise routes and priorities, ensuring that connections to key
community destinations are cleared of snow and ice throughout the
winter.
Pavement Management
in 2012, the city implemented an annual pavement management
program for asphalt trail maintenance. this program has been
successful in providing annual funding for crack and fog sealing of
trails. the city is broken into five areas, resulting in trail maintenance
occurring every five years for each segment.
However, this system may have been put into place too late for
many of the older segments of trails that were installed over 30 years
ago. these sections have deteriorated past a point of repair and will
likely need to be replaced in the coming years. these replaced trails
will then be on-track to receive regular maintenance as part of the
pavement management program.
this plan recommends a phased approach to replacement of
existing trails over the next 5-10 years, along with integrating
existing and future trails into the pavement management program.
the table below shows projected maintenance and capital costs.
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-13 imPlementation
Funding Strategies
achieving the vision for a well-connected bicycle and pedestrian
network in Farmington will take significant funding, not only for
construction of new facilities, but also for on-going maintenance of
existing and future facilities.
capital improvement projects in parks and trails have been funded
over the years in Farmington through two funding sources:
»Funds received from residential, commercial and industrial
development, received as cash in-lieu of land through the park
dedication process
»transfers through the city’s municipal liquor store profit
With most capital funding tied to new development, investment
has been inconsistent over the years. most of the Priority Projects,
as identified in this plan, will need to be funded independently of
private development, through collaborative efforts, grants, and
potential increase in funds allocated through the city’s general funds.
General Funds
general funds should be used as a primary source for on-going
maintenance, operations, and amenities for the bike and pedestrian
system. capital improvements can also be funded through general
funds. general funds are often used as a match for grant funding.
Dedicated Tax levy
a city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds
directed specifically for parks and recreation. this levy can be
used for capital projects as well as operations and maintenance.
the proceeds may be in place of or supplement general funds.
the advantage of a dedicated tax levy is that parks and recreation
receives a more stable source of funding and does not have to
compete with other city priorities for funding on an annual basis.
Bonding
general obligation Bonds and revenue Bonds provide another
source of implementation funding for new facilities, and in some
cases, can provide funding for repairs and upgrades of existing
facilities.
residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or
temporary tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park,
trail, and bikeway improvements and maintenance. these funds
are usually provided through bonds approved as part of a voter
referendum.
4-14
State Aid Funds
state aid funds are available for pedestrian and bicycle
improvements on state aid roadways. this funding source
is particularly useful at the time of street construction or re-
construction.
Partnerships
Public and private partnerships have the potential to provide
a wide array of funding opportunities beyond the traditional
municipal models. Partnerships with dakota county have
proven to be successful in building the existing trail network in
Farmington. Further partnerships with Farmington school district,
community education, and local businesses will be important for
implementation of events and programming, and can support future
grant writing efforts as well. organizations with partner funding
can also provide assistance with design, outreach, or maintenance/
stewardship of facilities. Partnerships and relationships with local
businesses can result in easements, use agreements, or donated
funds for future bike and ped facilities.
Donations
Private donations are a potential funding source; these may be
from individuals or area corporations, or donations of labor from
recreation clubs or use agreements. “adopt-a-trail” programs,
memorial bench donations, and incentives for local businesses to
provide bike racks are all examples of how organizations, businesses,
and individuals could help with maintenance and funding, while
raising awareness and enthusiasm of the bike/ped system.
Grants
grant funding throughout dakota county has had a positive impact
on the implementation of local and regional bicycle and pedestrian
network. grant funding generally requires a match by the city, likely
through general funds. grant funding also typically favors larger,
capital projects over maintenance and operations funding. grant
funding might also require evidence of partnerships and community
engagement and support for specific requests. the following are
some grant opportunities that could be pursued for implementation
of plan elements, along with links for more information:
Regional Solicitation Grants for Bike/Ped Facilities
the metropolitan council allocates federal funds through regional
solicitation grants. Funding priorities include multi-use trails,
bicycle facilities, grade-separated crossings, filling network gaps,
intersection/crossing treatments, sidewalks, streetscaping, ada
improvements, and safe routes to school infrastructure projects.
these grants are available on 2-year funding cycle, with the next
solicitation for grant applications anticipated in early 2020.
https://metrocouncil.org/transportation/Planning-2/transportation-
Funding/regional-solicitation-neW.aspx
Fa
r
m
i
n
g
t
o
n
B
i
k
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
P
l
a
n
4-15 imPlementation
local Trail Connections (lTC)
local trail connections grants are administered through mn
dnr. these grants fund relatively short trail connections between
where people live and desired community destinations, and are
not intended for funding significant new trails. Funding prioritizes
projects with significant connectivity, high expected use, and
attractive integration of cultural and natural resources.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/trails_local.html
Safe Routes to School Grants (MnDOT)
mndot administers grant funding to support safe routes to school
(srts) Planning assistance and plan development to support
schools’ effort to promote safe biking and walking for students on
a daily basis. small micro-grants are occasionally available to fund
educational or encouragement programs such as bike fleets and
bike rodeos. srts Plans are generally used as a foundation for
cities and school districts to apply for srts infrastructure grants.
infrastructure grants support capital funding for projects that
promote and encourage biking and walking to school, such as trails,
sidewalks, and other bike/ped facilities near schools. other example
projects include traffic calming, crosswalk signals, bicycle parking
and ada improvements. srts Planning assistance and infrastructure
grants are generally available on an annual basis.
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/saferoutes/grants-funding.html
MN DNR Natural and Scenic Area Grants
the mn dnr natural and scenic area grants are intended to
protect and provide public access to high quality natural and
scenic areas. example projects include trails, overlooks interpretive
displays, benches, wayfinding and trailhead parking. all projects
must align with the state outdoor recreation Plan (scorP). this
grant is typically available annually, with an application deadline in
early spring.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/land/natural-scenic-app-cycle.html
MN DNR Outdoor Recreation Grants
the mn dnr outdoor recreation grant is intended to fund projects
that increase and enhance outdoor recreation facilities in local and
community parks throughout the state. all projects must align with
the state outdoor recreation Plan (scorP). example projects
include internal park trails and trail amenities. this grant is typically
available annually, with an application deadline in early spring.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/recreation/outdoor_rec.html
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:R ound Table F ormat
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
T he roundtable agenda item allows C ommis s ion members to share information or as k questions of staff
about items not on the agenda. No formal decisions are made during this agenda item.
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Informational Updates
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
Information will be s hared during the meeting with C ommission members about the following items:
Dew Days
P rairie P ines P ark and Marigold P ark development
F airhill Es tate at North C reek development trails and park s tatus
TO:F armington P arks and R ec reation C ommission Members
F R O M:R andy Distad, P arks and R ecreation Director
S UB J E C T:Items for S eptember 11, 2019 Meeting Agenda
D AT E:July 10, 2019
B AC KG R OUN D
Bec ause the August meeting will involve having a parks and fac ilities tour with the C ity C ounc il, the next
regular meeting will oc cur on S eptember 11. S taff has identified the following possible items to inc lude on
the S eptember 11 meeting agenda:
agenda for joint meeting with ET P R C
review of park and facilities tour that occ urred with the C ity C ouncil
P rairie P ines and Marigold P ark development update
pres entation about R ambling R iver C enter activities during first six months of 2019
s econd report on the s ummer activities passport program