HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.10.96 Special Council Minutes
MINUTES
COUNCIL MEETING
SPECIAL
JUNE 10, 1996
1. Acting Mayor Galler called the meeting to order at 7:25 P.M..
Members Present: Galler, Ristow, Gamer.
Members Absent: Kuchera, Fitch.
Also Present: City Administrator Erar, Attorney Grannis, Members of the Parks
and Recreation Advisory Commission.
2. Parks Projects
Parks and Recreation Director Bell gave a detailed presentation on proposed park
improvement projects including the improvement, expansion, and installation of
trails, playgrounds, ballfields and facilities. The list had been discussed
extensively and prioritized by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Discussion
revolved around the various aspects of the requested improvements and the method of
introducing the need to the public. The need to hire consultants to prepare cost
estimates and public presentations was discussed. It was the consensus of the
Councilmembers present to move forward with the projects as listed. Staff was
directed to proceed with a more in depth analysis to be presented at a future
Council meeting. Acting Mayor Galler thanked the PARAC members and Mr. Bell for
their excellent work on the proposal.
3. Director Bell updated Council on the pool reconstruction project. If all goes
well, the pool should open on Saturday, June 15th. Mr. Bell also praised the
exceptional effort put forth by City crews in order to complete the project.
4. Ames Mineral Extraction Permit
Council continued discussion on the Ames Mineral Extraction Permit. City Engineer
Kaldunski noted that he had discussed the conditions of the permit with James Hill,
representing Ames Construction, and that there were no problems associated with
meeting the conditions. MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to approve the mineral
extraction permit as requested. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
5. East Farmington Second Addition Development Agreement
City Administrator Erar provided background information which lead to the resolution
of issues involved with the approval of the agreement. He acknowledged the efforts
of Sienna Corporation and Budget Oil in reaching a settlement. Topics discussed
included:
. assignment of Larch Street construction assessments (50% of the center median and
100% of the street assessed against the plat) ;
. acquisition of required right-of-way for east frontage road and elimination of
direct access to Budget Mart
. placement of Budget Mart's pylon sign;
. storm sewer to correct Budget Mart drainage problems.
Attorney Grannis explained the agreement he drafted with Budget oil and the
Leibfried's for the right of way acquisition. All parties had agreed to the terms
of the agreement. MOTION by Gamer, second by Galler to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R63-96
approving the terms and authorizing the signing of the development agreement for
East Farmington Second Addition. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Ristow, second by
Gamer to approve the right of way acquisition agreement with Budget Oil. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
6. Central Maintenance Facility Sites
Parks and Recreation Director Bell presented the advantage, disadvantage and cost
associated with each of 7 potential location sites. Staff requested Council to
narrow the possibilities down to 3 preferred site so that in depth analysis and
acquisition negotiations could begin. After reviewing and discussing each site, the
Council determined their three preferred sites and directed staff to continue
working on the project. Council also expressed their belief that the park project
referendum and the central maintenance facility be kept as separate issues.
7. Street Light Standards
The basis of the discussion was the cost difference, both purchase and repair,
between plain poles and the new decorative poles. Councilmember Ristow stated he
had received complaints from some developers regarding the high cost of the new
decorative poles. He also stated that the cost of repairing damaged or vandalized
decorative poles was higher and felt it could become a financial problem :t.::r the
City. Decorative poles in the downtown area did not appear to be an issue; only
those being installed in new subdivisions and on street improvement projects. It
was the consensus of Council to discuss the issue with the full Council at either
the June 17th or July 1st regular meetings.
8. Size and Height Limits on Accessory Storage Buildings and Detached Garages
Assistant Administrator Finstuen explained a survey of surrounding communities'
regulations on height and size for accessory storage buildings and detached garages.
The Council agreed that changes to the size and height restrictions on accessory
buildings and detached garages were warranted and directed the Planning Commission
to review the ordinance and forward proposed changes at a future meeting.
9. The Council acknowledged Lakeville Councilmember Betty Sindt receiving the C.C.
Ludwig Award.
10. MOTION by Ristow, second by Gamer to adjourn at 9:15 P.M.. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
~Y-
Mary Hanson
Clerk Typist