HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.29.93 Special Council Minutes
<~6
MINUTES
COUNCIL MEETING
SPECIAL
MARCH 29, 1993
1. Mayor Kuchera called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. at the
Dakota Electric Association lunchroom.
Members Present: Kuchera, Ristow, Orr, Rotty, Galler.
Members Absent: None.
Also Present: Administrator Thompson, Planner Tooker.
2. Mayor Kuchera opened a public hearing at 7:00 P.M. to consider the
proposed East Farmington PUD schematic plan which would rezone the
proposed property from R-l and R-3 to PUD (R-2). Mayor Kuchera
presented an opening statement, noting the Planning Commission had
recommended approving the schematic plan of the PUD. Developer Rod
Hardy presented an overview of the project noting:
a. 500 single family units,
b. 120 unit congregate care facility,
c. Alzheimer's care unit,
d. water table and drainage system,
e. lot layouts and design,
f. housing styles.
The following comments were heard:
Laura Adelmann:
The ditch is going right through my property.
Who is going to pay for it and how will it
affect my property?
Rod Hardy:
The City is in the process of designing the
project, but I can't tell you what the final
design would be.
Cm. Galler:
The VRWMC is the controlling body which is
presently looking at the project.
Bill Kaufman:
You can't move the water with the river at
its present level. We don't need a bigger
problem.
Cm. Galler:
That is the biggest issue.
Bill Kaufman:
This problem should be resolved before the
project goes ahead.
Do you have any hold ponds in the project?
Yes. In the north and south boulevard.
Mary MacEnany:
Rod Hardy:
46 Council Minutes - 3/29/93 - Page 2
Mary MacEnany:
Rod Hardy:
We don't need any additional water.
We are required by law to drain the project
area. We have to create a solution.
Al Schurtz:
You are hoping to break ground in the Fall?
How can you do that?
Rod Hardy:
That is conditioned upon the City completing
its study. The work (study) has to be
carried out.
Al Schurtz:
When is the project considered a go?
Rod Hardy: First is zoning, which we are doing now.
Next is the preliminary plat. Then we need a
development agreement. Also the City has to be in a position to
construct the water way.
Cm. Galler:
(Listed concerns in Planner
memo). The City has to be
proceeds and the developer has
before he is willing to commit
Tooker's 2/18/93
comfortable with
to have some
additional money
the project before it
preliminary approvals
to the project.
Laura Adelman:
Flat land won't move water.
on your site.
Keep the water
Greg Adelman:
You made Wausau add a pond.
pond through it?
Now you run a
Cm. Galler:
That took place when Wausau was in Empire
Township.
Rod Hardy:
The issue is that the water has to be moved
in order to serve the City. The issue
I don't want to belittle the water issue, but I
work with the City to resolve this issue.
tonight is zoning.
would invite you to
Joy Eldred:
In 1985 we were promised something would
happen. How active is the VRWMC at this
time?
Adm. Thompson: The City is committed to address this problem
with or without the East Farmington PUD
project. The City expects the VRWMC to conceptually approve the
project at its April meeting.
Joy Eldred:
located?
I hope you keep Henderson residents in mind.
Where are the townhomes and apartments
Council Minutes - 3/29/93 - Page 3
:1~)
Rod Hardy: (denotes location) Just so you are aware
that we need to do a lot more engineering if
we receive approval. We will know the footprints of the townhomes
once we compile the engineering.
Linda Tabaka:
Will they be one or two story?
Rod Hardy: I'm not sure; probably two story. Also, the
proposed office complex south of Budget Mart
would be changed to "garden" apartments.
Joy Eldred:
Why are you backing up apartments to the
Henderson Addition?
Rod Hardy:
We are backing up single families to
Henderson.
Pat Akin:
Read a Statement. Issues:
a. Highway 3 - No one at MnDOT is aware of it. Will Spruce Street
exchange Walnut Street intersection? How many entrances will be
allowed on TH 3?
b. East Farmington is a poor choice for a name.
c. Drainage Ditch - We are not sold that the drainage ditch will
solve the problems.
d. Why so many lots?
e. TIF - Has Council looked at the TIF proposal or obtained a legal
opinion?
f. Tot Lots - Do you believe that homeowners will maintain the lots?
g. What experience has the U of M had designing drainage projects?
h. Council should address:
- Documented proof of MnDOT's concurrence.
- Who pays for ditch.
- Is there assurance from Empire that they will go along with the
annexation?
- TIF - Yes or No.
- Only 25% of lots should be 60' lots.
- 5 Year CIP should be developed which addresses growth.
- Put a one year moratorium on new plats.
George Betzold:
table. Only one way to
chemicals. If you want
Who determines the water table elevation?
You will be substantially below the water
maintain the waterway and that is with
to get rid of water, put it in a pipe.
50 Council Minutes - 3/29/93 - Page 4
John Hed: I live at the Spruce Street entrance to this
plat. I would like to know when I'm supposed
to move? I was told that if I didn't deal with Sienna, the City would
condemn. I set a high price to make a profit. Will the City
interfere with my negotiations?
Lois Carey:
What is the status of eliminating Townsedge
Shopping Center?
Adm. Thompson:
The two proposals are not tied together.
Bill Kaufman:
Is the City considering tearing down the
shopping center? Why would you want to do
that?
Joy Eldred:
What is the status of the ditch project?
Adm. Thompson: The City has approached the VRWMC, which is
going to consider the project at its next
meeting. The City is committed to working with the VRWMC to complete
the project.
Bill Carey:
The Council is going to go ahead with the
Southeast Area Stormwater Project?
Mayor Kuchera:
Yes.
Bill Carey:
Who is going to pay for that?
Laura Adelman:
You mean the ditch is a done deal?
Rod Hardy: No. The project has to be first ordered and
designed. What has been stated is the
Council is committed to move ahead with this project.
Gary Cameron:
Regarding the ditch, if Farmington East is
developed, how much would they pay for
managing the water?
Adm. Thompson:
Janet Mosely:
Approximately $600,000.
Where are we going to put the kids?
Mary MacEnany:
Who determines where the holding ponds are
built?
Rod Hardy:
We propose and the City approves.
Bill Kaufman:
Are there going to be any basements?
Rod Hardy:
Only half basements.
Mary MacEnany:
Do you feel you have an obligation to protect
existing homeowners?
Council MinuteR - 3/29/93 - PaqA 5
;::;'1
"j' -A
Mayor Kuchera:
Yes. The developer does too.
Ray Nicolai:
Don't believe everything you hear from
engineers.
Dan Morris: I will also lose my home to this project.
Growth is inevitable. ,What I keep hearing is
that you are going to have a water problem with or without this
project and that this project will only help the area. With no change
comes a slow death. The 500 homes would help local businesses. If I
were a businessman, I would be appalled that the Council isn't jumping
on this project. I would like to know if and when this project will
go ahead so I can get on with my life.
It is not a workable
tax burden. Make it
better than what has
Adequate preparation and plans have not taken
place. MnDOT doesn't know about the project.
plan. Density is too high. It will add to the
a good, healthy growth project. We deserve
been shown.
Mary Christensen:
Greg Adelman:
What is my land worth?
John Hed:
I haven't found one existing block in town
with 16 houses on it.
Pat Akin:
I am not picking on the Council. I would
like to thank the Council for its
consideration.
Administrator Thompson read a letter from Robert and Florence
Frankhouser.
Nancy Becker:
We do not have City sewer. Would we be
required to pay for the sewer?
Rod Hardy:
We are not obligated to provide sewer to your
property.
Eng. Kaldunski: It would be available to serve you, but would
not be ordered as part of the project. It
would have to be petitioned by the property owners.
Laura Adelman:
Will any properties be rental?
Rod Hardy:
Single family will be owner occupied. Some
of the apartments would be rental.
Laura Adelman:
Is there a church proposed?
Rod Hardy:
Possibly in the hospital area.
Laura Adelman:
Will 213th Street be paved?
52 Council Minutes - 3/29/93 - Page 6
Mayor Kuchera:
That's up to the County and Town Board.
Joy Eldred:
Will sanitary sewers still have to be pumped?
Eng. Kaldunski:
We will hopefully eliminate that problem.
Joy Eldred:
will that be a cost to Henderson residents?
Eng. Kaldunski:
I'm not sure, but I believe it would be a
function of benefit to the property. It
difficult to prove individual benefit to Henderson
exists and it would mainly be a trunk line.
would probably be
since the service
Lois Carey:
I'm not opposed to high density housing. A
lot of retired people want smaller lots and
townhouses.
Willard Barnett:
Road 31 and Highway 50.
You are going to make Spruce Street the main
thoroughfare and put in commercial at County
Cm. Galler: It was mentioned at a Council/Planning
Commission meeting, but no formal action was
taken. It was also mentioned at an HRA meeting.
Mary MacEnany:
What effect does the zoning have?
Adm. Thompson: PUD virtually locks the developer into the
proposed schematic plan. The density is
approximately 3 units per acre.
Mary MacEnany:
This is going to change the feel of the whole
community because of the small lots.
Arvin Kuglin:
Where are you going to put the cars? Where
are you going to put the snow?
Mayor Kuchera:
Have you built similar developments?
Rod Hardy: 60 foot lots in Southcross Heights and on Lac
Lavon we have 50 foot lots. Visiting parking
will only be allowed on one side. Also, the value of these homes will
be in the $90 and $100 thousand range. What I'm hearing is that you
don't want additional people.
Pat Akin: Throughout the 7 County metro area all cities
want to go to larger lots. I've checked with
other cities and they rate you about a 2.5 on a scale to 10.
Rod Hardy:
I'm in the business.
Bob Nerud:
I'm going to have swamps put in on either
side of my house.
6;3
Council Minutes - 3/29/93 - Page 7
Shirley Woods:
What would be wrong with having smaller and
larger lots?
Rod Hardy:
You can buy 2 lots and build one house or buy
three lots and build two. You also have to
I am in the business every day so I take
the comments that we haven't looked at the
look at the market.
exception to some of
market.
Mary MacEnany:
If zoning is approved, will our schools be
able to accommodate the kids?
Adm. Thompson:
The School Superintendent and School Board
Chair were involved in the planning.
Mary MacEnany:
R-l and R-3 - what does it cover?
Adm. Thompson:
R-l Low Density - 10,000 square feet; R-3
High Density - 18 units per acre.
Pat Akin:
Why R-2 zoning under the PUD?
Adm. Thompson:
To accommodate the 6,000 square foot lots.
Will Barnett: This is going to impact the schools. Will
they be held to the same lot coverage
densities as in other areas?
Cm. Rotty:
Yes.
Ferro pellicci:
Do you have a price per lot?
Rod Hardy:
$22,000 more or less.
Mike Devney:
What is the fall from the plat to the river?
Eng. Kaldunski:
I'm not sure.
Arvin Kuglin:
30% of the lots can be covered by buildings?
Planner Tooker:
Yes.
Mike Devney:
Eng. Kaldunski:
Will SCS be involved?
Yes.
Roger Wood:
I am against it because of lot size.
3. MOTION by Rotty, second by Ristow to continue the public hearing
to the next regular meeting, AprilS, 1993 at 7:30 P.M.. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
54 Council Minutes - 3/29/93 - Page 8
4. MOTION by Orr, second by Ristow to adjourn at 9:35 P.M.. APIF,
MOTION CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
/i7 ~r'"
Larry Thompson
City Administrator
Approved
, I
J; / I F
; 1'(5/ q i!J
1