Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.22.82 Special Council Minutes 47 COUNCIL COUNCIL MEETING SPEC IAL MARCH 22, 1982 1. The Mayor called the meeting to order Present: Mayor Stegmaier, Councilmembers Absent: None Also Present: at 7:00 P.M. Cook, Kelly, Kuchera, Orr Administrator Ford, Attorney Gorgos, Planner Tooker 2. The minutes of March 15, 1982 were deferred. 3. The Council received a presentation by staff concerning the revIsions to the City Comprehensive Plan presently at the Metropolitan Council for review. City Planner Tooker explained that the City was agreeing to accept the lesser population grC>>Jth figures insisted upon by the Metropolitan Council in return for a committment in writing, by them, that if a pattern of development were established in excess of those grC>>Jth figures, that steps would immediately be taken by them to expand the Empire Plant and to provide the necessary sewage treatment capacity. He presented various maps. shC>>Jing the areas which were expected to develop, which would be included within the restricted acreage limitations, and the various stages of devel- opment through 1985, 1990, and the year 2000. A list of possible public improvements which would be included in the Capital Improvement Plan through the years 1981 and 1985 inclusive were also presented to the Council. One improvementshC>>Jn on the spread sheet was that of sewer and water extended to the proposed industrial development area west of #31. This particular improvement was discussed separately by the Council. The Council instructed staff to work up a prospectus of the cost of those improvements and hC>>J they would be assessed, and a delineation of the benefitted property. The Council also discussed separately a small portion of the Devney property which was nC>>J in the industrial zoning district; and the advisability of rezoning that small portion to Residential-Agricultural which would be the same as the rest of the Devney property. Staff was instructed to contact Mr. Devney to determine his desires in this matter and if agreeable to him to prepare a zoning ordinance amendment for submittal to the Council. The Council then gave its specific approval for the general ~irection in which the negotiations have been conducted by staff in relation to the Metropolitan Council, and authorized a continuance of that general posture. 4. In the matter of the selection of a new Police Chief, the Council, at the previous meeting, had instructed the City Administrator to prepare a suggested list of candidates to act as members of an Oral Board of Review after having received suggestions from individual members of the Council. Those recommendations were now before the Council in a memo dated March 17, 1982. Motion by Orr, second by Kelly that the recommendations contained in that memo be approved with the stipulation that if substitutions were necessary that a balance be maintained between representatives from the rural area and from the metropolitan area. Voting for: Stegmaier, Cook, Kelly, Orr. Voting against: Kuchera. Motion carried. 5. Fire Chief Dave Pietsch and Site Selection Committeemember Del Stapf appeared before the Council to discuss the on-going process of selecting a future fire facility site. They presented to the Council an updated comparative schedule of four sites dated February 18, 1982. The relative merits of these four sites were discussed among members of the Council and Fire Department representatives. The Council unanimously decided to eliminate 48 further consideration of Site C. The Council then authorized and directed the Selection Committee to negotiate with the owner of Site D as to specific location, specific size, sale price, method of payment, handling of special assessments, and other pertinent matters, and report back to the Counc i I with the above i nformat i on app I led to a two acre site and to a three acre site as an alternate. 6. The City Administrator informed the Council that, that day, he had received a call from the Police Chief in Apple Valley, Lloyd Rivers, stating that Apple Valley was in the process of updating and renovating their complete public safety communications system. It was pointed out that the Apple Valley Police Department does the dispatching for the City of Farmington during non-normal working hours. The Council was told that there was a possible opportunity to increase the capability of the Farm- ington Police hand-held radios at this time if a decision was made to incorporate certain renovations within the project on which Apple Valley would be taking bids. Motion by Kelly, second by Kuchera auth- orizing and directing the City Administrator to inform Apple Valley that Farmington would appreciate including these modifications on behalf of Farmington in their general specifications as an alternat~ and authorizing the expenditure in an amount not to exceed $2,000 for such purpose. APIF, motion carried. 7. Motion by Kuchera, second by Cook that an item be put on the April 5, 1982 agenda concerning the possible reconsideration by the Council of a previous decision not to provide for a voluntary agricultural preserve program within the City of Farmington. Voting for: Cook, Kelly, Kuchera, Orr. Voting against: Stegmaier. Motion carried. 8. Motion made and seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~~/$;/ Will i am J . Ford City Administrator APPROVED: 41sj ~ WJF/sz