Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.13.23 Planning Packet Meeting Location: Farmington City Hall 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 13, 2023 7:00 PM Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1. Approve Planning Commission Minutes Approve the minutes from the May 9, 2023 regular meeting. Agenda Item: Approve Planning Commission Minutes - Pdf 3 - 6 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3.1. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to allow for the Expansion of a Charter School within the B-2 Zoning District - Great Oaks Academy - 115 Elm Street Approve the amendment to the conditional use permit to allow the expansion of a school at the property located at 115 Elm Street contingent upon the following: 1. An encroachment agreement must be executed to allow the construction of the fire lane within the City's drainage and utility easement. 2. Additional safety precautions (i.e. bollards, fencing, etc.) must be installed along the outside perimeter of the courtyard. An updated plan must be submitted to staff for approval. 3. An access easement must be prepared and executed for the site access to First Street. 4. Westbound right turn lanes must be constructed at the intersections of Elm Street and First Street and Elm Street and the schools private access within two years of the CUP approval. The turn lanes must meet County approval. 5. The submission and approval of all building and fire permits as deemed necessary for the expansion. 6. Sign permit shall be submitted and approved for any exterior signage to be placed on the buildings or site. 7 - 68 Page 1 of 90 Agenda Item: Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to allow for the Expansion of a Charter School within the B-2 Zoning District - Great Oaks Academy - - Pdf 3.2. Amendment to a Planned Unit Development - Vita Attiva at South Creek, 5140 216th Street W Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution amending the PUD Agreement for Vita Attiva at South Creek to allow for an increased sign area and height for a monument sign to be located at 5140 216th Street W. Agenda Item: Amendment to a Planned Unit Development - Vita Attiva at South Creek, 5140 216th Street W - Pdf 69 - 77 3.3. Conditional Use Permit for Grocery Store within the B-1 Zoning District - 705 8th Street - Sultan Haque Continue the public hearing to the July 11th regular meeting. Agenda Item: Conditional Use Permit for Grocery Store within the B-1 Zoning District - 705 8th Street - Sultan Haque - Pdf 78 3.4. Amendment to a Planned Unit Development - Trinity Care Center - 905 Elm Street The Planning Commission should recommend approval of the attached resolution approving the third amendment to the Planned Unit Development site plan for Trinity Care Center and forward that recommendation on to the City Council. Agenda Item: Amendment to a Planned Unit Development - Trinity Care Center - 905 Elm Street - Pdf 79 - 90 4. DISCUSSION 5. ADJOURN Page 2 of 90 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMO To: Planning Commission From: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager Department: Planning Commission Subject: Approve Planning Commission Minutes Meeting: Planning Commission - Jun 13 2023 INTRODUCTION: Attached, are the minutes form the May 9, 2023 regular meeting. DISCUSSION: Not applicable BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes from the May 9, 2023 regular meeting. ATTACHMENTS: May 9th PC minutes Page 3 of 90 Page 2 of 4 Page 4 of 90 Page 3 of 4 Page 5 of 90 Page 4 of 4 Page 6 of 90 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMO To: Planning Commission From: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager Department: Planning Commission Subject: Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to allow for the Expansion of a Charter School within the B-2 Zoning District - Great Oaks Academy - 115 Elm Street Meeting: Planning Commission - Jun 13 2023 INTRODUCTION: Great Oaks Academy is seeking an amendment to a conditional use permit to allow further expansion of their Charter School located at 115 Elm Street. Great Oaks Academy was granted a conditional use permit by the commission on January 11, 2022 to establish the Charter School within the former grocery store space located at 115 Elm Street. The proposed expansion includes renovating and occupying the existing strip center on the east side of the property for additional middle school classrooms, adding a gymnasium expansion along with a two story "future" high school addition, and renovating the interior of the northern most portion of the former grocery store building that was previously occupied by @Bat into classrooms. At the April 11, 2023 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission denied an application by Great Oaks Academy for similar expansion plan. The Planning Commission denied the applicat ion based on a number of findings most notably the lack of a full buildout plan and that the plan was generally not harmonious with the surroundings. DISCUSSION: Great Oaks Academy Review As a recap, Great Oaks Academy is a tuition-free, classical charter school built on the pillars of Rigor, Literature, Wonder, and Virtue. The school is deeply committed to building a school with rigorous academics, high expectations, and a strong emphasis on developing character while encouraging each student's natural sense of wonder at the world. The mission of Great Oaks Academy is to provide students with a classical, liberal arts education that is rigorous, literature-rich, wonderous, and virtuous. The vision is to graduate young adults who: • Are fully prepared for the rigors of college and career; • Value truth, beauty, and goodness; • Possess a lifelong passion for learning; • Are active participants in their communities; • Recognize the value of their contributions Page 7 of 90 As outlined in the attached packet, the annual enrollment projections for the school are as follows: School Year Grades Served Enrollment Total Staff FY 23/24 K-7 402 40 FY 24/25 K-8 454 47 FY 25/26 K-9 519 54 FY 26/27 K-10 584 61 FY 27/28 K-11 662 66 FY 28/29 K-12 737 71 FY 29/30 K-12 776 75 FY 30/31 K-12 840 78 Conditional Use Permit Amendment Great Oaks Academy is requesting approval to amend a previously approved conditional use permit to allow the expansion of a Charter School at the property located at 115 Elm Street. The property is currently owned by Farmington 115, LLC (Wellington Management Company). The property is within the B-2 (Downtown Business) Zoning District and schools are listed as conditional uses. As shown on the attached site plan and floor plans the proposed expansion consists of 5 components, they are: 1. The interior renovation of the northern most portion of the existing school building that had been previously occupied by @Bat. This includes converting the space into 3 additional classrooms and restroom. 2. The interior renovation of the existing strip center on the east side of the site. This renovation would largely consist of 8 middle school classrooms, cafeteria, office space, science room, art room and restrooms. 3. Building addition to the north side of the existing strip center. The addition includes a lobby area, restrooms, storage areas, an approximately 5,264 square foot gymnasium. 4. The attached plan calls for the future construction of a two story high school that would be attached to the gymnasium addition. According to the attached plan the High School would consist of 8 general classrooms, music room, maker space, special needs spaces, office and larger vestibule/common space. The high school addition would be approximately 20,000 square feet in size. The proposed plan also provides a bituminous fire lane on the east side of the proposed building expansion. This fire lane encroaches within a drainage and utility easement that currently has 10" sanitary sewer line and a 8" water line. If approved, a condition of approval should be that an encroachment agreement must be executed to allow the fire lane within the drainage and utility easement. 5. Removal of portions of the existing parking lot to create a courtyard to the west of the proposed gymnasium addition along with greenspace on the southern end of the existing strip center building adjacent to the right-of-way of Elm Street. Fencing is proposed along the western side and portions of the northern and southern sides of the proposed courtyard. If approved, a condition of approval should be that additional safety precautions (i.e., bollards, fencing or the like) must be installed along the outside perimeter of the courtyard. An updated plan must be submitted to staff for approval. Traffic Circulation and Parking Page 8 of 90 As shown in the attachment, Middle School drop off and pick up will utilize the Elm Street access while the elementary school will enter off of First Street and exit through the Elm Street access. The applicant has also included information on bus/car drop off and pick up schedules. This information has been attached to this memorandum. The applicant has indicated that the public and non -peak Great Oaks traffic will still be able to come directly onto and through the site from Elm Street as there is a access easement that was granted when the site was originally developed along the east side of the former grocery store building that provides access to the commercial properties to the north. It should be noted that the access to the site off of First Street does not have such an access easement for the general public, even though it is routinely used by the general public. If approved, a condition of approval should be that an access easement should be prepared and execut ed for the access off of First Street. As previously mentioned, this property is zoned B-2 (Downtown Business). Properties zoned B-2 are exempt from meeting the off-street parking requirements outlined in code. The property currently has 229 off-street stalls within within its boundary. With the proposed building expansion and additional greenspace approximately 68 stalls would be removed from the site. If the plan were to be constructed as proposed approximately 161 off -street parking stalls would remain on site. An updated traffic study was performed for the conditional use permit application and is included within the attachment. The study indicates that right turn lanes will be warranted by the year 2028/2029 based on enrollment projections. If approved, a condition of approval should be that westbound right turn lanes shall be constructed at the intersections of Elm Street and First Street and Elm Street and the schools private access within two years of CUP approval. Conditional Use Permit As outlined in City Code, a conditional use shall be approved if it is found to meet the following criteria: 1. The proposed use conforms to the district permitted and conditional use provisions and all general regulations of this title. 2. The proposed use shall not involve any element or cause any conditions that may be dangerous, injurious or noxious to any other property or person and shall comply with the performance standards listed below. 3. The proposed use shall be constructed, designed, sited, or iented and landscaped to produce harmonious relationship of buildings and grounds to adjacent buildings and properties. 4. The proposed use shall produce a total visual impression and environment which is consistent with the environment of the neighborhood. 5. The proposed use shall organize vehicular access and parking to minimize traffic congestion in the neighborhood. 6. The proposed use shall preserve the objectives of this title and shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff believes the application meets the above-reference criteria. BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the amendment to the conditional use permit to allow the expansion of a school at the property located at 115 Elm Street contingent upon the following: Page 9 of 90 1. An encroachment agreement must be executed to allow the construction of the fire lane within the City's drainage and utility easement. 2. Additional safety precautions (i.e. bollards, fencing, etc.) must be installed along the outside perimeter of the courtyard. An updated plan must be submitted to staff for approval. 3. An access easement must be prepared and executed for the site access to First Street. 4. Westbound right turn lanes must be constructed at the intersections of Elm Street and First Street and Elm Street and the schools private access within two years of the CUP approval. The turn lanes must meet County approval. 5. The submission and approval of all building and fire permits as deemed necessary for the expansion. 6. Sign permit shall be submitted and approved for any exterior signage to be placed on the buildings or site. ATTACHMENTS: Great Oaks Academy CUP Application May 11, 2023 Updated Page 10 of 90 Page 11 of 90 Page 12 of 90 Page 13 of 90 SITE PLAN TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS RENDERING Page 14 of 90 May 12, 2023SITE DIAGRAM Great Oaks Academy EXISTING SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL REMODEL THREE NEW CLASSROOMS 14 SPACES 34 SPACES 24 SPACES 28 SPACES 7 S P A C E S 2 A D A 8 SPACES 16 SPACES 9 SPACES 9 S P A C E S 2 A D A 97’97’ EXISTING GREEN SPACE PLAY AREA PR O P E R T Y L I N E 20 ’ A C C E S S E A S E M E N T DR A I N A G E & U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T NE W A D D I T I O N FU T U R E T W O S T O R Y H I G H S C H O O L COURTYARD CROSSING WITH STOP SIGNS, CROSSING GUARDS & SPEED BUMPS EXISTING SIGN EXISTING PLAYGOUND 97’ 15 3 ’ ELEMENTARY & HIGH SCHOOL PARKING MIDDLE SCHOOL PARKING FENCE EASEMENT FOR NORTHERN PROPERTIES FIR E L A N E SIGNAGE AVAILABLE FOR TENANTS OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH Pa g e 1 5 o f 9 0 May 12, 2023TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Great Oaks Academy EXISTING SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL REMODEL 97’97’ PR O P E R T Y L I N E 20 ’ A C C E S S E A S E M E N T DR A I N A G E & U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T NE W A D D I T I O N FU T U R E T W O S T O R Y H I G H S C H O O L EXISTING PLAYGOUND COURTYARD EASEMENT FOR NORTHERN PROPERTIES FIR E L A N E MI D D L E S C H O O L & FU T U R E H I G H S C H O O L PA R E N T S EL E M E N T A R Y S C H O O L P A R E N T S & B U S E S CROSSING WITH STOP SIGNS, CROSSING GUARDS & SPEED BUMPS This traffic circulation is for Great Oaks morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up only. Public and non-peak Great Oaks traffic will come directly onto and through the property from Elm St. Pa g e 1 6 o f 9 0 1,035 SF SCIENCE 151 1,162 SF ART 152 215 SF PREP/STORAGE 153 214 SF STORAGE 154 834 SF CLASSROOM 162 847 SF CLASSROOM 163 814 SF CLASSROOM 164 803 SF CLASSROOM 165831 SF CLASSROOM 166 615 SF CLASSROOM 167 215 SF NURSE 157 154 SF PRINCIPAL 194 155 SF CONFERENCE 195 306 SF RECEPTION 196 57 SF TOILET 197 620 SF SPECIAL ED 198 765 SF CLASSROOM 199 111 SF SMALL GROUP 200 111 SF SMALL GROUP 201 111 SF SMALL GROUP 202 5,264 SF GYM 177 160 SF BOYS 192 41 SF FAMILY TOILET 179 187 SF GIRLS 193 206 SF P.E. STORAGE 170 183 SF BAND / MUSIC ST0RAGE 169 LOBBY 203 43 SF JANITOR 204 44' - 0" NEW TWO STORY HIGH SCHOOL 8 GENERAL CLASSROOMS, MUSIC ROOM, MAKER SPACE, SPECIAL NEEDS SPACES, OFFICE AND LARGER VESTIBULE/COMMONS SPACE +/- 20,000 SF DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. NO: DRAWING NO: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT NAME: N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NPRELIMINARY COPYRIGHT 2023 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 21 W. Superior St., Ste 500 | Duluth, MN 55802 | 218.727.8446 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION 1 2 3 4 CLIENT: A B C D 5 E F 1 05/12/2023 CUP SUBMITTAL 115 Elm Street, Farmington, MN 55024 BIM 360://221247 Great Oaks Academy Campus Planning/221247 Great Oaks Academy Campus Planning.rvt 5/10/2023 3:17:57 PM A101 APO KCH 221247 MIDDLE SCHOOL, STORM SHELTER AND @BAT FLOOR PLAN 0 5 /1 2 /2 0 2 3 GREAT OAKS ACADEMY CAMPUS GREAT OAKS ACADEMY 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 1 - Middle School 1/8" = 1'-0"2 Level 1 - Storm Shelter AdditionPa g e 1 7 o f 9 0 796 SF CLASSROOM 189 796 SF CLASSROOM 188 795 SF CLASSROOM 187 494 SF CLASSROOM 185 777 SF CLASSROOM 183 49 SF TOILET 205 55 SF STORAGE 206 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJ. NO: DRAWING NO: DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT NAME: N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NPRELIMINARY COPYRIGHT 2023 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 21 W. Superior St., Ste 500 | Duluth, MN 55802 | 218.727.8446 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS NO DATE REVISION 1 CLIENT: A B 2 1 05/12/2023 CUP SUBMITTAL BI M 3 6 0 : / / 2 2 1 2 4 7 G r e a t O a k s A c a d e m y C a m p u s P l a n n i n g /2 2 1 2 4 7 G r e a t O a k s A c a d e m y C a m p u s P l a n n i n g . r v t 5/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 3 3 : 2 0 : 2 8 P M A102APO KCH 221247 @BAT FLOOR PLAN 0 5 /1 2 /2 0 2 3 GREAT OAKS ACADEMY CAMPUS GREAT OAKS ACADEMY 3/32" = 1'-0"1 @Bat Pa g e 1 8 o f 9 0 June 1, 2023RENDERING Great Oaks Academy Pa g e 1 9 o f 9 0 ADJACENT PROPERTY INFO Page 20 of 90 Page 21 of 90 Page 22 of 90 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BUS/CAR DROP-OFF AND PICK-UP SCHEDULES BY YEAR Page 23 of 90 Note: The traffic study utilizes maximum possible enrollment projections. Page 24 of 90 Page 25 of 90 Page 26 of 90 Page 27 of 90 Page 28 of 90 Page 29 of 90 Page 30 of 90 TRAFFIC STUDY (UPDATED FOR FULL FUTURE ENROLLMENT) Page 31 of 90 1 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN May 26, 2023 To: Paul McGlynn, Director – Great Oaks Academy Rick Nelson, Winthrop Commercial, Inc From: Vernon Swing, PE Re: Traffic Analysis Update – Great Oak Academy Middle and High School Addition, Farmington, MN The anticipated demand for K-12 opportunities at the Great Oaks Academy has been refined to reflect recent history and future requests. Per the request of the City of Farmington Planning Commission, S 2 Traffic Solutions has reviewed the current expansion plans for the Great Oaks Academy in Farmington, MN and renewed the analysis to reflect the enrollment numbers. This review includes the existing elementary school traffic with an enrollment of 330 students, the anticipated reuse of the retail building on the eastern side of the site as a middle school building by 2025, and the addition of high school grades beginning in 2026 which would add high school students at the middle school building. By the 2027-2028 school year it is anticipated that a new structure will be added to the site to house high school student for grades 9-11, and grade 12 will be added in 2028-2029. (See Figure 1 – Site Plan.) The enrollment will grow steadily through these years topping out at 840 students on site in the 2030-2031 school year. Table 1 summarizes the anticipated enrollment between today and 2031. Table 1 – Enrollment by year School Year Grades included Maximum Enrollment Existing* K-6 330 2023-2024 K-7 432 2024-2025* K-8 504 2025-2026* K-9 576 2026-2027 K-10 648 2027-2028 K-11 720 2028-2029* K-12 792 2029-2030 K-12 816 2030-2031* K-12 840 *Designates milestone years for analysis This analysis focuses on the milestone years when substantial changes to the demographics are anticipated, namely when the site has a full middle school (24-25) in the former retail building, when the site starts to include high school students (25-26), when the site includes K-12 enrollment (28-29), and when the school has maximum enrollment (30-31). The following sections will outline the change in on- site conditions, trip generation and traffic operations for each of the milestone years, and a summary Table of the traffic operations will be provided at the end of this report to allow the reader to compare each condition head-to-head. Figures are provided at the end of the document illustrating the traffic movements for each analysis year. maximum Page 32 of 90 2 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Existing Conditions An initial traffic study was completed in 2021 for the redevelopment of the 36,000 square foot Family Fresh grocery store as a K-5 Charter School. For the initial study traffic counts in the fall of 2021 were completed at the intersections of Elm Street and 1st Street, Elm Street and Site Access, Elm Street and 3rd Street, 1st Street and South Access, 1st Street and North Access. These counts were adjusted to reflect growth in background traffic at a rate of one percent per year to reflect the 2023 traffic conditions and traffic associated with a 330 student K-5 Charter School was added to the 2023 traffic conditions. This is the Existing Conditions for this analysis. To be consistent with the earlier analysis, this study uses the methods described in the Highway Capacity for the analysis. The following is repeated from the earlier study to describe the analysis methodology. The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as roadways, traffic signals, roundabouts and stop-controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volume on that facility. Various factors affect capacity including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number of travel lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for evaluating capacity and operating conditions are contained in Highway Capacity Manual1. The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of driver delay represented as a Level of Service (LOS). Operations are given letter designations with "A" representing the best operating conditions and "F" representing the worst. Generally, level of service “D” represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. The Chart below summarizes the level of service and delay criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. For side street stop-controlled intersections special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the minor approaches. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side 1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Transportation Research Board, 6th Edition Page 33 of 90 3 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN street stop-control can be described two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approaches, since the mainline does not have to stop. It is common for intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience increased levels of delay and poor level of service on the side streets. A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable Level of Service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. In this report, the Industry Design Standard 95th percentile queue length is used. The 95th Percentile Queue Length refers to that length of vehicle queue that has only a five-percent probability of occurring during an analysis hour. This study has utilized the industry current Synchro/SimTraffic software package (11 th Edition) to analyze the conditions for both the AM and School PM peak hours. It is noted, the reported results are from the aggregate of 10 SimTraffic simulations which use a random number generator to seed the network with vehicles. These results reflect dynamic conditions and are more accurate than the results of the static analysis reported by Synchro. Due to the random number generator results can sometimes show slightly better operations on minor movements under higher traffic conditions when the intersections are operating well. 2021 Study The earlier study reviewed the impacts of a K-5 Charter School including 330 students by the 2022-23 school year on the traffic operations along Elm Street. The Trip Generation Table below (Table 2) is based on Trip Generation, Edition 11, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and reflects the Existing K-5 generated traffic condition. Figure 2 illustrates the existing condition. Table 2 – Existing Trip Generation It is noted, the earlier study did not anticipate the elimination of retail uses on site thus the study included existing retail traffic with the school traffic, and the results of the study indicated: The proposed Great Oaks Academy on the site located north of Elm Street and east of 1st Street will generate fewer trips than the previous grocery store use on this site. The operational analyses for the Existing Conditions are summarized below: Trips Generated: Enter Exit Enter Exit Charter School Institutional 1 537 330 Students R 194 172 R 112 116 194 172 112 116 228Totals 366 PM PeakLand Use Type Block No.Land Use Code Size AM peak Page 34 of 90 4 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Table 3 The results in Table 3 indicate the study area intersections operate at acceptable overall LOS B or better with all movements at acceptable LOS C or better during the 2023 AM and PM peak times with the K-5 Charter School. 2024-2025 Conditions Presently, the subject property includes the K-5 School with approximately 330 students, as well as the following businesses within the 14,000 square foot building:  Verizon  Hale Nutrition  Wengs Kitchen  USA Nails Traffic counts have been conducted on site to record the current traffic associated with the uses listed above, as well as the traffic associated with existing US Post Office and the smaller office/dance studio building located on the north end of the property. These counts reveal the retail uses generate 12 inbound and 11 outbound trips in the AM Peak, and 33 inbound and 34 outbound trips during the School PM Peak. Similarly, the Post Office and small office generate 5 inbound (4 Post Office trips) and 6 outbound (4 Post Office trips) trips during the AM peak, and 34 inbound (32 Post Office trips) and 35 outbound (34 Post Office trips) trips during the School PM Peak. The Post Office and small office traffic currently favors 1st Street versus traversing the school/retail parking area by approximately 72 percent. Proposed Middle School In the 2024-2025 school year the site will include K-8 opportunities with the Middle School use replacing the current retail uses on the site. The trip generation for the proposed middle school and elementary Overall LOS & Delay A 1.9 A 1.6 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay C 20.5 (NBL) C 16.7 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 3.6 A 3.3 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay B 14.0 (SBL) C 22.0 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay B 14.3 B 14.5 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay C 32.4 (EBL) C 25.7 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 0.4 A 0.4 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 3.4 (WBL) A 5.3 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 2.9 A 2.6 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 2.9 (NBR) A 2.7 (NBR) 95th Percentile Queue 1st Street & South Site Access (Side Stop Control)WB - 22' WB - 18' 1st Street & Cul-Du-Sac Access (Side Stop Control)NB - 58' NB - 66' Intersection AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Existing Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) Criteria 3rd Street & Elm Street (Traffic Signal)WB - 279' EBT - 280' Site Access & Elm Street (Side Stop Control SBR - 87' SBL - 112' 1st Street & Elm Street (Side Stop Control)EBL - 55' EBL - 50' Page 35 of 90 5 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN school campus has again been estimated using the methods described by ITE under land use code 537 Charter School. For 2024-2025 the trip generation reflects the anticipated enrollment of 504 students. Table 4 summarizes the findings. Figure 3 illustrates the 2024-2025 traffic conditions. Table 4 The traffic operations for the 2024-2025 (including the growth in background traffic at one percent per year and school traffic) have been analyzed resulting in an acceptable overall LOS B or better all movements at acceptable LOS D or better during the 2025 AM and PM peak times with the K-8 Charter School. Table 5 summarizes the results of the operational analysis. Table 5 2025-2026 Conditions In 2025-2026 school year, Great Oaks Academy will add high school grade 9 to the campus. It is anticipated during this school year, the 9th graders will share space in the middle school building while the High School building is being constructed to the north of the Middle School building. The trip generation for the proposed 9th grade, middle school, and elementary school campus has again been estimated using the methods described by ITE under land use code 538 Charter School with High School. For 2025-2026 the trip generation reflects the anticipated enrollment of 576 students. Table 6 summarizes the findings. Figure 4 illustrates the 2025-2026 traffic conditions. Trips Generated: Enter Exit Enter Exit Charter School Institutional 1 537 504 Students R 297 263 R 170 177 297 263 170 177 348Totals 559 PM PeakLand Use Type Block No.Land Use Code Size AM peak Overall LOS & Delay A 2.7 A 2.0 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay C 19.3 (SBL) C 15.8 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 4.8 A 3.1 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay C 23.3 (SBL) C 22.9 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay B 16.4 B 12.5 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay D 38.6 (EBL) C 26.6 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 0.3 A 0.3 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 4.9 (WBL) A 4.4 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 1.7 A 2.6 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 3.0 (NBR) A 2.8 (NBR) 95th Percentile Queue 1st Street & South Site Access (Side Stop Control)WB - 18' WB - 27' 1st Street & Cul-Du-Sac Access (Side Stop Control)NB - 65' NB - 60' 3rd Street & Elm Street (Traffic Signal)WB - 334' EBT - 240' 1st Street & Elm Street (Side Stop Control)SB - 67' EBL - 58' Intersection Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) Criteria 2025 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Site Access & Elm Street (Side Stop Control SBR - 82' SBL - 91' Page 36 of 90 6 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Table 6 It is noted that background traffic is expected to continue to increase at a rate of one percent per year. The traffic operations for the 2025-2026 school year have been analyzed resulting in an acceptable overall LOS C or better all movements at acceptable LOS D or better during the 2025 AM and PM peak times with the K-9 Charter School. Table 5 summarizes the results of the operational analysis. Table 7 2028-2029 Conditions For the 2028-2029 school year it is anticipated that the high school building will be complete and grades K-12 will be available at the Great Oaks Academy. The trip generation for the proposed K-12 school campus has again been estimated using the methods described by ITE under land use code 538 Charter School K-12. For 2028-2029 the trip generation reflects the anticipated enrollment of 792 students. Table 8 summarizes the findings. Figure 5 illustrates the 2028-2029 traffic conditions. Trips Generated: Enter Exit Enter Exit Charter School (K-12) Institutional 1 538 576 Students R 287 254 R 210 210 287 254 210 210 420Totals 541 PM PeakLand Use Type Block No.Land Use Code Size AM peak Overall LOS & Delay A 3.4 A 2.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay D 31.0 (SBL) C 18.5(SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 5.5 A 3.2 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay C 23.7 (SBL) C 24.1 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay C 20.6 B 13.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay D 46.8 (EBL) C 27.8 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 0.8 A 0.2 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 5.5 (WBL) A 3.7 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 1.7 A 2.6 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 2.8 (NBR) A 2.8 (NBR) 95th Percentile Queue 1st Street & Cul-Du-Sac Access (Side Stop Control)NB - 64' NB - 56' 3rd Street & Elm Street (Traffic Signal)WB - 362' EBT - 292' 1st Street & South Site Access (Side Stop Control)WB - 21' WB - 15' 1st Street & Elm Street (Side Stop Control)SB - 102' SB - 92' Site Access & Elm Street (Side Stop Control SBR - 97' SBL - 86' Intersection Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) Criteria 2026 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Page 37 of 90 7 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Table 8 The traffic operations at the study intersections reflecting the continued one percent annual growth rate in background traffic plus the K-12 School indicate that the overall operations remain acceptable at LOS B or better during the peak hours, but the individual movement operations at the site driveway to Elm Street is nearing capacity at LOS E. Table 9 summarizes the results of the 2028-2029 traffic conditions for the study area intersections. Table 9 The information in Table 9 indicates the southbound left turn at the Elm Street and the site access is operation at LOS E with 47.2 seconds of delay and 49.7 seconds of delay for the AM and School PM peaks, respectively, and a 95th percentile traffic queue (only occurring for at most 3 minutes of the peak hour) of 171 feet on site during the School PM Peak hour. To mitigate this condition two strategies were considered, change traffic control to a traffic signal, or include a westbound right turn lane into the site. It is noted, the earlier study reviewed right turn lane warrants at Elm Street and 1 st Street as well as the driveway intersection and concluded that the 1st Street intersection did meet warrants. The additional traffic associated with the 792 student campus will increase right turns at the site access intersection satisfying right lane warrants at the site access intersection as well. Analysis of these potential changes indicates the traffic signal option will be difficult as there is little space on Elm Street for vehicles to queue without encroaching on the nearby railroad crossing. Even Trips Generated: Enter Exit Enter Exit Charter School (K-12) Institutional 1 538 792 Students R 395 350 R 289 289 395 350 289 289 578Totals 744 PM PeakLand Use Type Block No.Land Use Code Size AM peak Overall LOS & Delay A 4.0 A 3.3 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay D 28.1 (SBL) C 23.8 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 8.3 A 6.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay E 47.6 E 49.7 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay B 19.3 B 13.1 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay D 47.2 (EBL) C 20.8 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 0.3 A 0.4 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 3.1 (WBL) A 3.6 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 1.6 A 2.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 2.9 (NBR) A 3.0 (NBR) 95th Percentile Queue 1st Street & Cul-Du-Sac Access (Side Stop Control)NB - 59' NB - 66' 3rd Street & Elm Street (Traffic Signal)WB - 355' EBT - 251' 1st Street & South Site Access (Side Stop Control)WB - 15' WB - 18' 1st Street & Elm Street (Side Stop Control)SB - 95' SB - 91' Site Access & Elm Street (Side Stop Control SBR - 141' SBL - 171' Intersection Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) Criteria 2029 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Page 38 of 90 8 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN when fully coordinated with the existing traffic signal at 3rd Avenue, vehicles will back to the railroad tracks. Also, the traffic operations and queuing did not significantly improve. Right turn lane warrants were tested to determine if traffic levels justify the installation of a right turn lane using the same methods as described in the earlier study. The volume of traffic turning into the site at the Elm Street Access has been reviewed to determine if right turn lane warrants are satisfied. New right turn lane warrants have been adopted by MnDOT and Minnesota Counties, including Dakota County, based on research conducted by the North Dakota State University. The NDSU study considered the cost versus benefit of turn lanes and produced results based on the cost of building the turn lane, the amount of traffic traveling through the intersection and the amount of traffic turning. In this case, with an urban design, it is estimated that a 100 foot turn lane with 60-foot taper would cost approximately $50,000 to construct (not including right of way or utility relocation). The Graph below summarizes the right turn lane warrant. The speed on Elm Street is “low speed” at 30 mph in the vicinity of the site, thus the blue line represents conditions for consideration. During the 2029 analysis year the right turn traffic from Elm Street at the driveway to the parking lot is forecast 117 (RT DHV) vehicles during the morning peak time. The through traffic passing the site during this time is forecast at 721 (DDHV) vehicles. Inspection of the graph show the intersection of these two lines is above the Blue Line curve indicating that a right turn lane is warranted at this location. The installation of a 100 foot right turn lane does reduce on-site delay to acceptable levels and does reduce the 95th percentile queue to a more manageable 120 feet in the AM Peak and 140 feet during the Page 39 of 90 9 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN PM Peak. Also, with this option the traffic approaching this intersection from the east does not conflict with the railroad track. 2030-2031 Conditions The Great Oaks Academy is forecast to be at full enrollment by 2030-2031 with 840 students. The trip generation for the school has been added to the background traffic which for this analysis includes a one percent annual growth rate. The trip generation for the proposed K-12 school campus has again been estimated using the methods described by ITE under land use code 538 Charter School K-12. For 2030- 2031 the trip generation reflects the anticipated enrollment of 840 students. Table 8 summarizes the findings. Figure 6 illustrates the 2030-2031 traffic conditions. Table 10 The traffic operations at the study intersections reflecting the continued one percent annual growth rate in background traffic plus the K-12 School indicate that the overall operations remain acceptable at LOS C or better during the peak hours, but the individual movement operations at the site driveway to Elm Street is nearing capacity at LOS E. Table 11 summarizes the results of the 2030-2031 traffic conditions for the study area intersections. Table 11 The information in Table 11 indicates the southbound left turn at the Elm Street and the site access is operation at LOS E with 49.2 seconds of delay, and a 95 th percentile traffic queue (only occurring for at most 3 minutes of the peak hour) of 146 feet on site during the AM Peak hour. Trips Generated: Enter Exit Enter Exit Charter School (K-12) Institutional 1 538 840 Students R 418 371 R 307 307 418 371 307 307 613Totals 790 PM PeakLand Use Type Block No.Land Use Code Size AM peak Overall LOS & Delay A 4.5 A 3.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay D 32.4 (SBL) C 23.8 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 8.1 A 4.7 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay E 49.2 D 31.1 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay C 20.8 B 15.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay D 48.6 (EBL) C 22.9 (EBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 0.8 A 0.7 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 6.6 (WBL) A 3.6 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 1.7 A 2.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 3.1 (NBR) A 3.0 (NBR) 95th Percentile Queue 1st Street & Cul-Du-Sac Access (Side Stop Control)NB - 72' NB - 67' 3rd Street & Elm Street (Traffic Signal)EBT - 405' EBT - 349' 1st Street & South Site Access (Side Stop Control)WB - 18' WB - 22' 1st Street & Elm Street (Side Stop Control)SB - 124' SB - 98' Site Access & Elm Street (Side Stop Control SBR - 146' SBL - 106' Intersection Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) Criteria 2031 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Page 40 of 90 10 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Again, the installation of a 100-foot right turn lane did reduce on-site delay to acceptable levels and did reduce the 95th percentile queue to a more manageable 120 feet. Table 12 on the following page combines the results of the analysis for easier comparison of operating conditions. Conclusion Traffic operations have been reviewed for the Great Oaks Academy site in Farmington, MN. The traffic engineering review include additional data collection to determine the change in traffic pattern associated with the change in use of the existing retail building to Middle School classrooms. Also, the review included the addition of a Charter High School building on site. Five separate analyses were undertaken to reflect milestones in the development process including the addition of the Middle School, the addition of 9th Graders, the full build out of the High School for all K- 12 grades, and the full maximum enrollment of the K-12 classes. The results of the study indicate that all intersections during all review years will operate at Level of Service C (LOS C) or better. The results also indicate that the exiting movement at the direct access intersection with Elm Street will operate at LOS E during the AM and School PM Peak times when the High School serves all 9-12 grades. Review of mitigation strategies suggests the addition of a right turn lane on Elm Street at the site access is warranted for the 2028-2029 school year and will reduce on-site delay and queuing to acceptable levels. Attachment: Figures 1-6 Original Traffic Study 2/4/2022 (Available upon request) Page 41 of 90 11 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Table 12 Overall LOS & Delay A 1.9 A 1.6 A 2.7 A 2.0 A 3.4 A 2.8 A 4.0 A 3.3 A 4.5 A 3.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay C 20.5 (NBL) C 16.7 (SBL) C 19.3 (SBL) C 15.8 (SBL) D 31.0 (SBL) C 18.5(SBL) D 28.1 (SBL) C 23.8 (SBL) D 32.4 (SBL) C 23.8 (SBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 3.6 A 3.3 A 4.8 A 3.1 A 5.5 A 3.2 A 8.3 A 6.8 A 8.1 A 4.7 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay B 14.0 (SBL) C 22.0 (SBL) C 23.3 (SBL) C 22.9 (SBL) C 23.7 (SBL) C 24.1 E 47.6 E 49.7 E 49.2 D 31.1 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay B 14.3 B 14.5 B 16.4 B 12.5 C 20.6 B 13.8 B 19.3 B 13.1 C 20.8 B 15.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay C 32.4 (EBL) C 25.7 (WBL) D 38.6 (EBL) C 26.6 (WBL)D 46.8 (EBL) C 27.8 (WBL)D 47.2 (EBL) C 20.8 (WBL)D 48.6 (EBL) C 22.9 (EBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 0.4 A 0.4 A 0.3 A 0.3 A 0.8 A 0.2 A 0.3 A 0.4 A 0.8 A 0.7 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 3.4 (WBL) A 5.3 (WBL) A 4.9 (WBL) A 4.4 (WBL) A 5.5 (WBL) A 3.7 (WBL) A 3.1 (WBL) A 3.6 (WBL) A 6.6 (WBL) A 3.6 (WBL) 95th Percentile Queue Overall LOS & Delay A 2.9 A 2.6 A 1.7 A 2.6 A 1.7 A 2.6 A 1.6 A 2.8 A 1.7 A 2.8 Worst Mvmt. LOS & Delay A 2.9 (NBR) A 2.7 (NBR) A 3.0 (NBR) A 2.8 (NBR) A 2.8 (NBR) A 2.8 (NBR) A 2.9 (NBR) A 3.0 (NBR) A 3.1 (NBR) A 3.0 (NBR) 95th Percentile Queue NB - 72' NB - 67' Measure of Effectiveness (Delay in Sec and Queue in Ft) SBR - 146' SBL - 106' EBT - 405' EBT - 349' WB - 18' WB - 22' 2031 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr SB - 124' SB - 98' NB - 64' NB - 56' 2029 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr SB - 95' SB - 91' SBR - 141' SBL - 171' WB - 355' EBT - 251' WB - 15' WB - 18' NB - 59' NB - 66' SBR - 97' SBL - 86' WB - 362' EBT - 292' WB - 21' WB - 15' 2026 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr SB - 102' SB - 92' 1st Street & Cul-Du-Sac Access (Side Stop Control)NB - 58' NB - 66' 2025 AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr SB - 67' EBL - 58' SBR - 82' SBL - 91' WB - 334' EBT - 240' WB - 18' WB - 27' NB - 65' NB - 60' 3rd Street & Elm Street (Traffic Signal)WB - 279' EBT - 280' 1st Street & South Site Access (Side Stop Control)WB - 22' WB - 18' 1st Street & Elm Street (Side Stop Control)EBL - 55' EBL - 50' Site Access & Elm Street (Side Stop Control SBR - 87' SBL - 112' Intersection Criteria Existing AM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Pa g e 4 2 o f 9 0 12 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Figure 1 – Site Plan (By Others) Pa g e 4 3 o f 9 0 13 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Page 44 of 90 14 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Page 45 of 90 15 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Page 46 of 90 16 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Page 47 of 90 17 | P a g e Great Oaks Academy, Farmington, MN Page 48 of 90 ORIGINAL 2022 TRAFFIC STUDY (FOR REFERENCE) Page 49 of 90 2022 Page 50 of 90 Page 51 of 90 Page 52 of 90 Page 53 of 90 Page 54 of 90 Page 55 of 90 Page 56 of 90 Page 57 of 90 Page 58 of 90 Page 59 of 90 Page 60 of 90 Page 61 of 90 Page 62 of 90 Page 63 of 90 Page 64 of 90 Page 65 of 90 Page 66 of 90 Page 67 of 90 Page 68 of 90 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMO To: Planning Commission From: Jared Johnson, Planning Coordinator Department: Community Development Subject: Amendment to a Planned Unit Development - Vita Attiva at South Creek, 5140 216th Street W Meeting: Planning Commission - Jun 13 2023 INTRODUCTION: Paul Whiteman, the applicant, has applied for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement for Vita Attiva at South Creek to allow for a 165 square-foot, 5.5-foot-tall monument sign located near the Vita Attiva amenities building at 5140 216th Street W. DISCUSSION: Background The City first entered into a PUD Agreement for the Vita Attiva at South Creek development in August of 2021. The PUD Agreement outlined approved deviations from zoning requirements in City Code such as reduced setbacks and lot sizes. The PUD Agreement was then amended in July of 2022 to add a deviation to increase the allowed building coverage. A second amendment to the PUD Agreement is being requested to add an additional deviation to allow for a monument sign that exceeds size and height requirements in City Code. Monument Sign The applicant is proposing a 165 square-foot, 5.5-foot-tall monument sign to be located directly east of the Vita Attiva amenities building facing Eaton Avenue. The sign will span 30 feet, centered with the amenities building in the background. The sign spells out "Vita Attiva" using 2.5 -foot-tall letters that will be up-lit from the ground. The base of the letters will be attached to a 3 -foot-tall stone base consisting of light brown tones. PUD Amendment Per City Code Section 10-6-3(B)-2b, Single-Family Subdivisions and Multi-Family Complexes are allowed one monument sign per street frontage and cannot exceed 50 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. As mentioned earlier, the proposed sign would be 165 square feet in area and 5.5 feet in height. PUD's allow for flexibility in zoning standards, including sign requirements. The proposed amendment to the PUD Agreement would allow the proposed sign to deviate from the above - mentioned sign requirement. Page 69 of 90 BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable ACTION REQUESTED: Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution amending the PUD Agreement for Vita Attiva at South Creek to allow for an increased sign area and height for a monument sign to be located at 5140 216th Street W. ATTACHMENTS: Application and Letter 5-24-2023 Plans-Combined Vita Attiva Sign PUD Resolution Page 2 of 9 Page 70 of 90 I-=o~*v>«»<»~Vc-»=-<~a'r=w»w/1 .3“y my .r.,.«..,._,.WW..m '7 430 Third st,Fannlngton,MN 55024 FARMINGTON FarmInglonMN gov PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Applicant:Vidz‘Telephone:'’DL{D*€‘ax:-’—“ Address:52%3 Z ‘?+h 7%‘rm}b3?’/'9-932 (‘I Street City State Zip Code Owner:P(7'VV\\i/‘31"‘\“'_C’M"fiTelephone:g/?/"'60/"5ZL‘(Fax: Maili?g Address:g (zcl?x CT Lu iC6“\M”‘”"/I/T! Street City State Zip Code Premises Involved:,._ 5/¢{(9 ?n 2&6“9 W,Pam»{¢»,w/64071‘-E»low afwf ( Addressl Legal Description (lot,block,plat name,section,township,range)C [M,i,‘awe,-¢_. Fee:$03>Paid Current Zoning District D Names &Addresses of All Owners: V/+4&4tl»~.t!«,«.,él—¢9/4 4 c.¢ 37 0 /ac)‘<1‘i .49 C»-~wt»..»<~«=.~r»mr s~~=.-Mt 1 SUBMITTAL RE UIREMENTS —SEE ATTACHED FORM }A ‘—-—--—%--54 —25 Signature?fApplicant Date Schematic Plan For office use only 1.Planning CommissionAction Recommended Approval _RecommendedDenial 2.City Council Action Approved Denied Preliminary PUD Plan 1.Public Hearing Set for:Advenised in Local Newspaper 2.Planning Commission Action RecommendedApproval Recommended Denial 3.City Council Action Approved ’Denied Final PUD Plan 1.City Council Action Approved Denied Comments: ConditionsSet: Planning division: Page 3 of 9 Page 71 of 90 VITA ATTIVA AT SOUTH CREEK Vita Attiva Developers 3720 120th ct w.Faribault,MN 55021 Written Statement -Form A Ownership of the land where the Vita Attiva monument sign is owned and operated by Vita Attiva Developers,LLC.The amenity center will eventually be transferred to the HOA and residents once the amenity building and exterior amenities are completed. The general character of Vita Attiva at South Creek is an active adult 55+development that includes villas and townhomes,with luxury amenities that include a 5,000 sq.ft.amenity building with a swimming pool,pickleball courts and tennis courts planned for phase 2 of the development.The amenity building is scheduled to be done by June 2023. The expected time schedule of the 3 total phases is dependent on sales and market conditions, however,we plan to be 100%occupied through 3 phases by the end of 2025. The ultimate ownership and maintenance of the development is currently with the building and land owner,VAD,however,ownership transfer will be shifted to the HOA Management group once the project is completed and accepted fully by the city and county. The total number of dwellings is currently 189 total over the course of 3 phases.We are currently in phase 1 of 3 phases. Page 4 of 9 Page 72 of 90 Pa g e 5 o f 9 Pa g e 7 3 o f 9 0 Pa g e 6 o f 9 Pa g e 7 4 o f 9 0 Pa g e 7 o f 9 Pa g e 7 5 o f 9 0 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION FOR A SECOND AMEDMENT TO THE VITA ATTIVA AT SOUTH CREEK PUD AGREEMENT AS IT PERTAINS TO A MONUMENT SIGN WHEREAS, the City entered into a Planned Unit Development [PUD] Agreement with the Developer of the Vita Attiva at South Creek on August 16, 2021 after review of the Agreement by the Planning Commission and City Council. WHEREAS, the PUD Agreement was first amended on July 18, 2022 after review of the amendment by the Planning Commission and City Council. WHEREAS, within the PUD Agreement are the approved deviations from City Code including reduced setbacks and lot sizes, and increased building coverage. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 13th day of June 2023 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and notice sent to surrounding property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Farmington Mayor and City Council hereby amends #4 of the Vita Attiva at South Creek PUD Agreement for a second time as follows, all additions are underlined: 4. Zoning. Except as otherwise modified by this Agreement, the land use, design and other requirements and standards of the R-2 and R-3 zoning districts shall apply to the Subject Property with the following exceptions: • Reduce the front yard setback for interior lots within the R-3 zone from 25 feet to 10 feet. • Reduce the minimum lot size within the R-2 zone from 6,000 square feet to 4,300 square feet. • Reduce the minimum lot width within the R-2 zone from 60 feet to 34 feet. • Reduce the size yard setback within the R-2 zone from 6 feet to 5 feet. • Increase the side yard setback on corner lot (second front yard) within the R-2 zone from 20 feet to 25 feet. • Increase the allowed building coverage from 35% to 51% within the R-2 zone. • Increase the maximum allowed square footage and height of a single monument sign from 50 square feet to 165 square feet and from a height of 5 feet to 5.5 feet. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this 20th day of June 2023. Page 8 of 9 Page 76 of 90 ATTEST: ____________________________ ______________________________ Joshua Hoyt, Mayor Shirley R Buecksler, City Clerk Page 9 of 9 Page 77 of 90 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMO To: Planning Commission From: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager Department: Planning Commission Subject: Conditional Use Permit for Grocery Store within the B-1 Zoning District - 705 8th Street - Sultan Haque Meeting: Planning Commission - Jun 13 2023 INTRODUCTION: A public hearing for June 13, 2023 had been set for the application by Mr. Sultan Haque for a conditional use permit to establish a grocery store at the property located at 705 8th Street. DISCUSSION: The applicant is in process of preparing updated information for the application. At this time staff will be requesting that the public hearing be continued to the July 11th regular meeting. BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable ACTION REQUESTED: Continue the public hearing to the July 11th regular meeting. Page 78 of 90 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMO To: Planning Commission From: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager Department: Planning Commission Subject: Amendment to a Planned Unit Development - Trinity Care Center - 905 Elm Street Meeting: Planning Commission - Jun 13 2023 INTRODUCTION: Attached, for the Commission's review and recommendation is a resolution for a third amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Trinity Care Center campus located at 905 Elm Street. DISCUSSION: Farmington Health Services dba Trinity Care Center is requesting a third amendment to the Planned Unit Development site plan for the property located at 905 Elm Street. There have been two previous amendments approved to the PUD site plan, one in 2016 and the second in 2019. The original PUD site plan was approved by City Council on November 19, 2012 and contained the following proposed site changes: • Construction of an additional (10) bed group home for memory care residents, identical to the one that previously opened in 2012. • The demolition of the remaining hospital building and construction of a utilities addition to the existing skilled nursing center. • The construction of two (2) senior living apartment buildings on the west side of the property. The 2016 PUD site plan amendment made several modifications to the original plan, including: • Removing the two (2) senior living apartment buildings from the plan. • Adds a twenty-nine (29) unit nursing home addition near the north end of the site. • Provides for a reduced front yard setback for the nursing home addition. The setback is reduced from twenty-five (25) feet to eighteen and one-half (18 1/2') feet. • Adds 5,997 square foot addition onto the north side of the existing nursing home for office, storage and delivery space. • Shows a north/south access road that connects from 213th Street W south to the entry drive off of Elm Street. This also shows cross access to the Pellicci hardware site both at the north and south end of the Pellicci site. The second amendment to the PUD site plan approved in 2019 included the following revisions: Page 79 of 90 • The removal of the north/south access road as it was determined that t his access is not needed for fire protection services. • Cross access to the Pellicci site (3560 213th Street W) was maintained with the second amendment as a proposed access drive was shown that extends from the southern boundary of the Pellicci site southeast to the Trinity entry drive. Additionally, cross access was provided on the north end of the Trinity site off of 213th Street to the parking lot on the north end of the Pellicci site. Necessary easements were required to be provided for cross access at the two locations to ensure those areas are available for construction of those accesses by the adjacent property owner. The third amendment, which is currently being proposed, consists of the following site improvements: • The removal/demolition of approximately 7,700 square feet of the existing nursing home portion of the facility. • The construction of a 21,127 square foot addition onto the east side of the nursing home facility. This addition will largely consist of additional storage area and an additional twenty (20) nursing home units. This addition will also connect into the existing apartment building located in the northeast portion of the site as well as the group home memory care unit on the southeast portion of the site. Current building coverage is approximately 20.3%. With the proposed site work the building coverage will increase to approximately 22.7%. The city's multi-family zone (R-4) allows for a maximum building coverage of 30 percent. Setbacks are not an issue with the proposed expansion. The addition is situated towards the center of the parcel. The required setbacks are as follows: Front: 25 feet, Side and Rear: 10 feet. The proposed addition well exceeds these requirements. A total of 183 off street parking stalls are provided on site. This well exceeds the requirements under city code for a senior care facility. BUDGET IMPACT: Not applicable ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission should recommend approval of the attached resolution approving the third amendment to the Planned Unit Development site plan for Trinity Care Center and forward that recommendation on to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Trinity Care Center PUD Application 4-2023 TCC SITE PLAN City of Farmington PUD Application and Supporting Docs. for Trinity Care Center 4 -26-2023 Trinity PUD Resolution Page 80 of 90 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS – SEE ATTACHED FORM “A” Signature of Applicant 4-20-2023 Date Applicant: Ben Ryan on behalf of Farmington Health Services Telephone: 320-212-7215 Fax: NA Address: _905 Elm Street Farmington MN 55024 Street City State Zip Code Owner: St. Francis Health Services of Morris, MN Telephone: 320-212-7215 Fax: NA Mailing Address: 801 Nevada Ave. Morris MN 56267 Street City State Zip Code Premises Involved: Parcel ID:14-77200-01-010, Plat: TRINITY HEALTH CARE 1ST ADD, Lot: _1, Block:1, Township: 114, Range: 19, County: Dakota Address/ Legal Description (lot, block, plat name, section, township, range) Fee: $ 300 Mailed 4-26-2023 Paid Current Zoning District R-4 (High Density Residential) Names & Addresses of All Owners: St. Francis Health Services - dba Farmington Health Services/Trinity Care Center Carol Raw (SFHS CEO), 801 Nevada Avenue, Morris, MN 56267 Schematic Plan 1. Planning Commission Action 2. City Council Action Recommended Approval Approved For office use only Recommended Denial Denied Preliminary PUD Plan 1. Public Hearing Set for: 2. Planning Commission Action 3. City Council Action Advertised in Local Newspaper Recommended Approval Approved Recommended Denial Denied Final PUD Plan 1. City Council Action Approved Denied Comments: Conditions Set: Planning division: Date: 9/19 Page 81 of 90 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FARGO, ND 58104 PH # 701-235-0199 417 MAIN AVE #210 FARGO, ND 58103 PH # 701-365-0418 5306 51ST AVE S SUITE A XXX OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE EXISTING HARDWARE STORE LABYRINTH EXISTING PARKING EXISTING APARTMENTS DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD #72 - 213TH STREET WESTELM STREETOPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED NEW 21,127 SF 1"=30'-0" NSITE PLAN DISCLAIMER: THIS PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR ALL WORK ON THIS SITE. FACILITY SIGN LP LP TRINITY CARE FARMINGTON, MN CENTER - ADDITION / REMODEL - 1 9 0 2 0 5 K A C PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY DATE COMPUTER NO. SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR KIM R. STOKES DATE REG. NO. 601 SHEYENNE ST., HORACE, ND 58047 / 701-282-2850 PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 05 - 16 - 23 REVISIONS A -0 .1 190205 SP GENERAL NOTES: 1"=30'-0" ARCHITECT: PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 601 SHEYENNE ST HORACE, ND 58047 PH # 701-282-2850 CIVIL ENGINEER: STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ANDERSON ENGINEERING Pa g e 8 2 o f 9 0 EXISTING HARDWARE STORE OPEN SPACE DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD #72 - 213TH STREET WEST PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING SITE PLAN 1"=120'-0" N N 0 ° 3 ' 5 5 " W 7 6 4 . 1 9 0 N 0 ° 0 ' 2 6 " W 1 8 0 . 0 0 0 N 0 ° 0 ' 2 6 " W 3 5 8 . 2 9 8 N 89°58'51" E 295.825 N 89°59'34" E 1012.940 N 89°59'34" E 85.000 RETENTION POND N 89°55'59.403" E 1351.061 N 1°40'12" W 226.322 N 89°59'34" E 1012.940 N 89°59'34" E 85.000 DETENTION POND TE N T H S T . EL E V E N T H S T . OAK STREET EXISTING APARTMENTS EXISTING APARTMENTS EXISTING APARTMENTS N 89°58'51" E 988.185 Pa g e 8 3 o f 9 0 C B.S. O M 12 UNITS 29 UNITS P P P P P P P P P SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD P P P P P P SU B CL BP BPP P P P P JC DNP P PP P P P P PP P RR O CONF O C O O O O F PANTRY DO EBR O PPPPPSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD P P P P P P P P P P P P P P (B) PP TRAINING KITCHEN DINING JC JC V V GCW C O DATA STOR OTPT DL CL O2ESS TR STOR TR O ELR RR RR JC NS C 1 9 0 2 0 5 K A C PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY DATE COMPUTER NO. SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR KIM R. STOKES DATE REG. NO. 601 SHEYENNE ST., HORACE, ND 58047 / 701-282-2850 PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 04 - 20 - 23 REVISIONS: A-2.1 190205 P1 OVERALL PLAN TRINITY CARE FARMINGTON, MN CENTER - ADDITION / REMODEL - DISCLAIMER: ARCHITECT: PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 601 SHEYENNE ST HORACE, ND 58047 PH # 701-282-2850 CIVIL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX MECHANICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX ALL DIVISIONS MUST REVIEW THEIR DETAILS; ANY INCOMPLETE DETAILS MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER-ARCHITECT PRIOR TO OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT SIGNING. FAILURE TO DO SO REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE DETAILS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER-ARCHITECT. THE PRODUCTS THAT ARE NOT LISTED ARE TO BE CONFIRMED WITH THE ARCHITECT AND NOT ASSUMED. LIKEWISE, IN ANY DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING, DO NOT SCALE THE PRINTS AND CALL THE ARCHITECT FOR DIRECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL REQUIRE CORRECTIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE OWNER-ARCHITECT. X FIRE PROTECTION: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1"=20'-0" EXISTING APARTMENTS DINING GARDEN 19,100 SF ADDITION O BS CL NM NS CHAPEL PPPP PP P O O ACT M SRR PRR P(B) P P P P O PPPP PPPP STORAGE SU O STOR O JCSTOR 1:12 1:12 1:12 1:12 105' 7 1/4" 7' 1 1 " 30 ' 0 " 7' 7"45' 0"122' 8"40' 5" 59 ' 9 1 / 2 " 35 ' 0 " 79 ' 9 " 24 ' 1 0 " 18' 0"85' 5" 9' 4 3 / 4 " 35' 3"14' 0" 36' 4 1/2" 5' 0 " 10 ' 0 " 25 ' 2 7 / 8 " Pa g e 8 4 o f 9 0 EL. 100'-0" FINISH FLOOR EL. 110'-1 1/8" TRUSS BRG. 412 1 9 0 2 0 5 K A C PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY DATE COMPUTER NO. SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR KIM R. STOKES DATE REG. NO. 601 SHEYENNE ST., HORACE, ND 58047 / 701-282-2850 PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 07 - 18 - 22 REVISIONS A -1 .1 190205 S1 TRINITY CARE FARMINGTON, MN CENTER - ADDITION / REMODEL - GENERAL NOTES: ARCHITECT: PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 601 SHEYENNE ST HORACE, ND 58047 PH # 701-282-2850 CIVIL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX MECHANICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX 1/8"=1'-0" 1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" 2 EAST ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" 3 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" LINK LINK STORAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSPa g e 8 5 o f 9 0 EL. 100'-0" FINISH FLOOR EL. 110'-1 1/8" TRUSS BRG. 412 1 9 0 2 0 5 K A C PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY DATE COMPUTER NO. SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR KIM R. STOKES DATE REG. NO. 601 SHEYENNE ST., HORACE, ND 58047 / 701-282-2850 PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 07 - 20 - 22 REVISIONS A-1.1 190205 S1 TRINITY CARE FARMINGTON, MN CENTER - ADDITION / REMODEL - GENERAL NOTES: ARCHITECT: PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 601 SHEYENNE ST HORACE, ND 58047 PH # 701-282-2850 CIVIL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX MECHANICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX 1/8"=1'-0" 1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" 2 EAST ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" 3 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8"=1'-0" LINK LINK STORAGE LINK 2-HOUR FIRE WALL ACROSS LINK TYPE 2B CONSTRUCTION THIS SIDE OF THE FIRE WALL (NON- COMBUSTIBLE) TYPE 5B CONSTRUCTION THIS SIDE OF THE FIRE WALL (ANY MATERIAL) TO MATCH EXISTING MEMORY CARE BUILDING FFE - 97'-0" (36" LOWER THAN NH FFE) UTILITY BRICK MATCH EXISTING EIFS MATCH EXISTING EXISTING NURSING HOME EXISTING NURSING HOME SIDEWALK TYPE 2B CONSTRUCTION THIS SIDE OF THE FIRE WALL (NON- COMBUSTIBLE) TYPE 5B CONSTRUCTION THIS SIDE OF THE FIRE WALL (ANY MATERIAL) TO MATCH EXISTING MEMORY CARE BUILDING 2-HOUR FIRE WALL ACROSS LINK LINK EXISTING NURSING HOME FFE - 105'-0" (60" HIGHER THAN NH FFE) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSPa g e 8 6 o f 9 0 1 9 0 2 0 5 K A C PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY DATE COMPUTER NO. SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR KIM R. STOKES DATE REG. NO. 601 SHEYENNE ST., HORACE, ND 58047 / 701-282-2850 PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 06 - 29 - 22 REVISIONS: A -2 .2 190205 P1 OVERALL ROOF PLAN TRINITY CARE FARMINGTON, MN CENTER - ADDITION / REMODEL - DISCLAIMER: ARCHITECT: PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 601 SHEYENNE ST HORACE, ND 58047 PH # 701-282-2850 CIVIL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX MECHANICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX ALL DIVISIONS MUST REVIEW THEIR DETAILS; ANY INCOMPLETE DETAILS MUST BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER-ARCHITECT PRIOR TO OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT SIGNING. FAILURE TO DO SO REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO THE DETAILS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER-ARCHITECT. THE PRODUCTS THAT ARE NOT LISTED ARE TO BE CONFIRMED WITH THE ARCHITECT AND NOT ASSUMED. LIKEWISE, IN ANY DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING, DO NOT SCALE THE PRINTS AND CALL THE ARCHITECT FOR DIRECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL REQUIRE CORRECTIONS BY THE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE OWNER-ARCHITECT. X FIRE PROTECTION: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX 1"=20'-0" PRELIMINARY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PENTHOUSE COURTYARD Pa g e 8 7 o f 9 0 NOTE: SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR INFO. ON CONCRETE, DECKING, JOISTS AND REINFORCING. CONTRACTOR TO MAKE SURE ALL PENETRATIONS IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE (INTERIOR & EXTERIOR) ARE ALL SEALED AIR TIGHT. ALL POTENTIAL OPENINGS SHOULD TAPPED, CAULKED, WEATHERSTRIPPED ETC. 1. 2. LOW/HIGH ROOF WALL SECTION 1/2"=1'-0" 3 EL. 108'-0" 10 MIL. POLY UNDER INSUL. MANSARD ROOF T.O. PARAPET EXT. WALL SECTION 1/2"=1'-0" 1 F .F . CONT. THRU WALL FLASHING TO EXTEND A MIN. OF 6" ABOVE MORTAR NET WEEPS @ 32" OC W/ MORTAR NET 12"H UTILITY BRICK APPROVED VAPOR BARRIER BY ROOF MANUFACTURER EL. 100'-0" EL. 115'-7" 1/2" BOND BREAKER GROUT BOTTOM 2 COURSES SOLID THRU WALL FLASHING BACK FLASHING EL. 112'-8 3/8" JST. BRG. EL. 112'-0" B.O. SOFFIT FLOOR AND CEILING RUNNERS - (NOT SHOWN) - CHANNEL SHAPED, FABRICATED FROM MIN 0.0329 IN., BARE METAL THICKNESS (NO. 20 MSG) CORROSION-PROTECTED STEEL, THAT PROVIDE A SOUND STRUCTURAL CONNECTION BETWEEN STEEL STUDS AND ADJACENT ASSEMBLIES SUCH AS FLOORS, CEILINGS AND/OR OTHER WALLS. ATTACHED TO FLOOR AND CEILING ASSEMBLIES WITH STEEL FASTENERS SPACED NOT GREATER THAN 24 IN. OC. STEEL STUDS - MIN 0.0329 IN., BARE METAL THICKNESS (NO. 20 MSG) CORROSION PROTECTED STEEL STUDS, MIN 3-1/2 IN. WIDE, COLD FORMED, DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN OF COLD-FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS BY THE AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE (AISI). ALL DESIGN DETAILS ENHANCING THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE WALL ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING THE AXIAL DESIGN LOAD OF THE STUDS, SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE STEEL STUD DESIGNER AND/OR PRODUCER, AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODE AGENCIES. THE MAX STUD SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 24 IN. OC. STUDS ATTACHED TO FLOOR AND CEILING RUNNERS WITH 1/2 IN. LONG TYPE S-12 STEEL SCREWS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STUDS OR BY WELDED OR BOLTED CONNECTIONS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AISI SPECIFICATIONS. LATERAL SUPPORT MEMBERS - (NOT SHOWN) - WHERE REQUIRED FOR LATERAL SUPPORT OF STUDS, SUPPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY MEANS OF STEEL STRAPS, CHANNELS OR OTHER SIMILAR MEANS AS SPECIFIED IN THE DESIGN OF A PARTICULAR STEEL STUD WALL SYSTEM. GYPSUM BOARD - NOM 5/8 IN. THICK GYPSUM PANELS WITH SQUARE EDGES, APPLIED HORIZONTALLY OR VERTICALLY. FOR THE 1 HOUR SINGLE LAYER SYSTEM -WHEN THE GYPSUM BOARD PANELS ARE INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY THE JOINTS ARE TO BE STAGGERED BY A MINIMUM OF 12 IN. ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF ASSEMBLY, THEY ARE TO BE SECURED ON EACH SIDE OF THE STUDS WITH 1-1/4 IN. LONG TYPE S-12 BUGLE HEAD STEEL SCREWS SPACED 8 IN. OC TO THE TOP AND BOTTOM TRACKS AND IN THE FIELD WITH SCREWS 1 IN. AND 4 IN. FROM THE HORIZONTAL JOINTS. WHEN THE GYPSUM BOARD PANELS ARE INSTALLED VERTICALLY ALL VERTICAL JOINTS MUST BE CENTERED OVER STUDS AND STAGGERED MIN 1 STUD CAVITY ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF STUDS. GYPSUM BOARD SECURED TO STUDS WITH 1-1/4 IN. LONG TYPE S-12 STEEL SCREWS SPACED 8 IN. OC TO THE TOP AND BOTTOM TRACKS AND IN THE FIELD WITH SCREWS 1 IN AND 4 IN. FROM THE PERIMETER. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - 5/8 IN. THICK TYPE USGX FASTENERS - (NOT SHOWN) - FOR USE WITH ITEM 5 - TYPE S-12 STEEL SCREWS USED TO ATTACH PANELS TO RUNNERS AND STUDS. SINGLE LAYER SYSTEMS: 1 IN. LONG FOR 1/2 AND 5/8 IN. THICK PANELS OR 1-1/4 IN. LONG FOR 3/4 IN. THICK PANELS, SPACED 8 IN. OC WHEN PANELS ARE APPLIED HORIZONTALLY, OR 12 IN. OC WHEN PANELS ARE APPLIED VERTICALLY. SPRAY FOAM - ALL EXTERIOR WALL STUD CAVITIES JOINT TAPE AND COMPOUND - VINYL OR CASEIN, DRY OR PREMIXED JOINT COMPOUND APPLIED IN TWO COATS TO JOINTS AND SCREW HEADS OF OUTER LAYERS. PAPER TAPE, NOM 2 IN. WIDE, EMBEDDED IN FIRST LAYER OF COMPOUND OVER ALL JOINTS OF OUTER LAYERS. PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND MAY BE OMITTED WHEN GYPSUM BOARDS ARE SUPPLIED WITH SQUARE EDGES. SIDING, BRICK OR STUCCO - ALUMINUM, VINYL OR STEEL SIDING, BRICK VENEER OR STUCCO, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF LOCAL CODE AGENCIES. BRICK VENEER ATTACHED TO STUDS WITH CORRUGATED METAL WALL TIES ATTACHED TO EACH STUD WITH STEEL SCREWS, NOT MORE THAN EACH SIXTH COURSE OF BRICK. CAULKING AND SEALANTS - A BEAD OF ACOUSTICAL SEALANT APPLIED AROUND THE PARTITION PERIMETER FOR SOUND CONTROL. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - TYPE AS * BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKEXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM FLOOR SLAB SYSTEM FOUNDATION WALL 4 IN. CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB (SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION) (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR REINFORCING) 6 MIL. POLY 14" POURED CONCRETE WALL 2" RIGID INSULATION (XEPS) (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR REINFORCING) MINIMUM 6 IN. COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL 6" COMPACTED FILL (SAND) UTILITY FACE BRICK W/ AIR SPACE (VARIES) SEE ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM (E.I.F.S.) AS SHOWN ON ELEVATIONS 2" EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE (EPS) FOAM INSULATION ABOVE BRICK TO ACCEPT E.I.F.S. 2" STYROFOAM "CAVITYMATE" INSULATION BETWEEN BRICK AND GWB ROOF/CEILING SYSTEM INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY MANUFACTURER TAPERED RIGID INSULATION SYSTEM R-40 AVERAGE STEEL ROOF DECK (1-1/2" SEE STRUCT) STEEL ROOF JOISTS AND BRIDGING (BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKING) (BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKING) 5/8" (MIN) GYPSUM BOARD (DENS-DECK) (BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKING) COLD ROLLED CHANNELS PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF JOISTS TO HANG ACOUSTICAL CEILING PANELS HANGER WIRE CEILING PANELS 24 BY 24 IN. LAY-IN PANELS PROTECTED MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM (CLASS B RATING) 2" EPS E.I.F.S. (TYP) 3" SPRAY FOAM (R-20 MIN) T.O. BEAM EL. 124'-9 3/4" B.O. SOFFIT EL. 123'-6 7/8" CLG HGT - T.O. WDW EL. 121'-5" 1 LAYER 5/8" GWB FURRING CHANNELS 4" CONC. FLOOR E.I.F.S. RESIDENT ROOM 2" EPS 5/8" EXT. GRADE GWB T.O. PARAPET EL. 127'-5" CONT. THRU WALL FLASHING CONT. FLASHING 8" METAL STUD WALL 2" EPS E.I.F.S. (TYP) 3" SPRAY FOAM (R-20 MIN) CONT. THRU WALL FLASHING EL. 108'-0" F .F . CONT. THRU WALL FLASHING TO EXTEND A MIN. OF 6" ABOVE MORTAR NET WEEPS @ 32" OC W/ MORTAR NET 12"H UTILITY BRICK EL. 100'-0" GROUT BOTTOM 2 COURSES SOLID THRU WALL FLASHING BACK FLASHING T.O. PARAPET EL. 115'-7" EL. 112'-8 3/8" JST. BRG. EL. 112'-0" B.O. SOFFIT EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM - CONTINUED MANSARD ROOF SPRAY OR ROLL-ON WATER RESISTIVE MEMBRANE AND AIR BARRIER TIE WIRE (TYP) 1-1/2" COLD ROLLED CHANNEL @ 48" OC 1 LAYER 5/8" GWB GWB CEILING TO FLUSH OUT W/ WINDOW HEAD RETURN HANGER WIRE (TYP) HANGER WIRE (TYP) DEMISING WALL SECTION 1/2"=1'-0" 4 CLG. HTG. 5/8" TYPE X GWB ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE (TYP) SOUDPROOF INSULATION RESIDENT ROOM 4" CONC. SLAB RESIDENT ROOM 5/8" TYPE X GWB ROOF MEMBRANE (EPDM) STEEL DECKING TAPERED INSULATION SYSTEM 5/8" DENS DECK EL. 108'-6" ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE (TYP) 4" CONC. SLAB 5 FIRE/SMOKE BARRIER WALL SECTION 1/2"=1'-0" EL. 100'-0" F.F. FLOOR AND CEILING RUNNERS - (NOT SHOWN) - CHANNEL SHAPED, FABRICATED FROM MIN 0.0329 IN. THICK, BARE METAL THICKNESS (NO. 20 MSG) CORROSION- PROTECTED STEEL, THAT PROVIDES A SOUND STRUCTURAL CONNECTION BETWEEN STEEL STUDS AND ADJACENT ASSEMBLIES SUCH AS FLOORS, CEILINGS AND/OR OTHER WALLS. ATTACHED TO FLOOR AND CEILING ASSEMBLIES WITH STEEL FASTENERS SPACED NOT GREATER THAN 24 IN. OC. STEEL STUDS - MIN 0.0329 IN. THICK, BARE METAL THICKNESS (NO. 20 MSG) CORROSION-PROTECTED STEEL STUDS, MIN 3-1/2 IN. WIDE, COLD FORMED, DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN OF COLD-FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS BY THE AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE (AISI). ALL DESIGN DETAILS ENHANCING THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE WALL ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING THE AXIAL DESIGN LOAD OF THE STUDS, SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE STEEL STUD DESIGNER AND/OR PRODUCER, AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODE AGENCIES. THE MAX STUD SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 24 IN. OC. STUDS ATTACHED TO FLOOR AND CEILING RUNNERS WITH 1/2 IN. LONG TYPE S-12 STEEL SCREWS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STUDS OR BY WELDED OR BOLTED CONNECTIONS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AISI SPECIFICATIONS (BEARING WALLS). STUDS TO BE CUT 1/2 TO 3/4 IN. LESS THAN ASSEMBLY HEIGHT AND FRICTION-FITTED INTO FLOOR AND CEILING RUNNERS (NONBEARING WALLS). LATERAL SUPPORT MEMBERS - (NOT SHOWN) - WHERE REQUIRED FOR LATERAL SUPPORT OF STUDS, SUPPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY MEANS OF STEEL STRAPS, CHANNELS OR OTHER SIMILAR MEANS AS SPECIFIED IN THE DESIGN OF A PARTICULAR STEEL STUD WALL SYSTEM. GYPSUM BOARD* - NOM 5/8 IN. THICK, 24 TO 54 IN. WIDE GYPSUM PANELS, ATTACHED VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY WITH 1-1/4 IN. LONG TYPE S-12 STEEL SCREWS. WHEN APPLIED VERTICALLY TO STUDS, JOINTS CENTERED OVER STUDS AND STAGGERED ONE STUD CAVITY ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF STUDS AND ATTACHED WITH SCREWS SPACED 8 IN. OC ALONG THE EDGES AND 12 IN. OC IN THE FIELD. WHEN APPLIED HORIZONTALLY TO STUDS, NO DISTANCE REQUIREMENT ON JOINTS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF STUDS AND ATTACHED WITH SCREWS SPACED 8 IN. OC ALONG THE EDGES AND IN THE FIELD. WHEN USED IN WIDTHS OTHER THAN 48 IN., GYPSUM PANELS TO BE INSTALLED HORIZONTALLY. *UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - TYPE FRX-G. BATTS AND BLANKETS* - (OPTIONAL, NOT SHOWN) - PLACED IN STUD CAVITIES, ANY GLASS FIBER OR MINERAL WOOL INSULATION BEARING THE UL CLASSIFICATION MARKING AS TO SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS AND/OR FIRE RESISTANCE. SEE BATTS AND BLANKETS (BKNV OR BZJZ) CATEGORIES FOR NAMES OF CLASSIFIED COMPANIES. JOINT TAPE AND COMPOUND - VINYL OR CASEIN, DRY OR PREMIXED JOINT COMPOUND APPLIED IN TWO COATS TO JOINTS AND SCREW HEADS. PAPER TAPE, NOM 2 IN. WIDE, EMBEDDED IN FIRST LAYER OF COMPOUND OVER ALL JOINT. PAPER TAPE AND JOINT COMPOUND MAY BE OMITTED WHEN GYPSUM BOARDS ARE SUPPLIED WITH SQUARE EDGES. CAULKING AND SEALANTS* - (OPTIONAL, NOT SHOWN) - A BEAD OF ACOUSTICAL SEALANT APPLIED AROUND THE PARTITION PERIMETER FOR SOUND CONTROL. *UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - TYPE AS FIRE/SMOKE BARRIER WALL SYSTEM U.L. DESIGN NO. U432 1 LAYER 5/8" FRX-G GWB 1 LAYER 5/8" FRX-G GWB FILL ALL VOIDS BETWEEN ROOF DECK AND TOP RUNNER WITH FIRE STOP MATERIAL APPROVED FOR 1-HOUR BY HILTI OR 3M NOTE: ALL PENETRATIONS IN THIS WALL SYSTEM SHALL BE PROPERLY SEALED W/ APPROVED FIRE STOP AND SHALL BE DONE SO ON BOTH SIDES OF WALL ASSEMBLY EXT. WALL SECTION 1/2"=1'-0" 2 10 MIL. POLY UNDER INSUL. 1/2" BOND BREAKER APPROVED VAPOR BARRIER BY ROOF MANUFACTURER T.O. BEAM EL. 112'-8 3/8" ROOF MEMBRANE (EPDM) STEEL DECKING TAPERED INSULATION SYSTEM 5/8" DENS DECK PARK AREA RESIDENT ROOM RESIDENT ROOM EL. 100'-0" F.F. EL. 100'-0" F.F. ACCUSTICAL TILE GRID SYSTEM 1 9 0 2 0 5 K A C PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY DATE COMPUTER NO. SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF - REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR KIM R. STOKES DATE REG. NO. 601 SHEYENNE ST., HORACE, ND 58047 / 701-282-2850 PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 07 - 18 - 22 REVISIONS A -3 .1 190205 S1 TRINITY CARE FARMINGTON, MN CENTER - ADDITION / REMODEL - GENERAL NOTES: ARCHITECT: PRAIRIE DESIGN STUDIO 601 SHEYENNE ST HORACE, ND 58047 PH # 701-282-2850 CIVIL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX MECHANICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: XXX XXX XXX PH # XXX EL. 108'-6" 1/2"=1'-0" S.D. X/A-X S.D. 5/A-13.1 S.D. 6/A-13.1 S.D. 4/A-13.1 S.D. X/A-X 6" METAL STUD WALL W/ FULL THICK SPRAY INSUL. S.D. X/A-X S.D. X/A-X WALL SECTIONS & NOTES 8" 2" 2' 5 " 8" 2" 8" 6 1 / 2 " 6 1/2" 8' 6 " Pa g e 8 8 o f 9 0 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION FOR A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVIES OF MORRIS, INC. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Schematic Site Plan for the St. Francis Health Services of Morris, Inc. Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the 19th day of November, 2012 and the 12.94 acres known as the St. Francis Trinity Campus and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, TRINITY HEALTH CARE 1ST ADDITION and rezoned the property to R-5 PUD; and WHEREAS, the original plan, as approved, included the construction of an additional ten (10) bed group home for Memory Care residents, the demolition of the remaining hospital, construction of a utilities addition to the existing skilled nursing care center, and construction of two (2) senior living apartments on the west side of the property. WHEREAS, an amendment to the original plan was approved by the City Council on September 6, 2016 and included the following revisions: removing the two senior living apartments and replacing them with an additional twenty nine (29) unit nursing home addition and additional office, storage and delivery space, the proposed nursing home addition is shown on the amended plans as having a reduced front setback of eighteen and one-half (18 ½’) feet, the parking for the site was changed to a total of 105 off-street parking stalls shown on the proposed plan, provided for a north/south access to the adjacent commercial site (3560 213th Street W) both at the north and south end of the adjacent site. WHEREAS, the second amendment to the PUD site plan includes the following revisions: the removal of the north/south access road, cross access to the adjacent commercial site (3560 213th Street W) is maintained with the proposed amended PUD site plan with an access that will extend from the southerly boundary of the adjacent commercial site southeast to the Triunity entry drive. Additionally, cross access was provided on the north end of the Trinity site off of 213th Street to the parking lot on the north end of the adjacent commercial site. The applicant provided the necessary easements for cross access at the two locations identified on the amended PUD site plan to ensure those areas are available for construction of those accesses by the adjacent property owner. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 13th day of June 2023 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and notice sent to surrounding property owners regarding a proposed third amendment to the PUD site plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Farmington Mayor and City Council hereby approves the third amendment to the PUD site plan which consists of the following site improvements: Page 89 of 90 •The removal/demolition of approximately 7,700 square feet of the existing nursing home portion of the facility. •The construction of a 21,127 square foot addition onto the east side of the nursing home facility. This addition largely consists of additional storage area and an additional twenty (20) nursing home units. This addition will also connect into the existing apartment building located in the northeast portion of the site as well as the group home memory care unit on the southeast portion of the site. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this 20th day of June 2023. ATTEST: ____________________________ ______________________________ Joshua Hoyt, Mayor Shirley R Buecksler, City Clerk Page 90 of 90