HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/13/09
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
A Proud Past - A Promising Future
Committed to Providing High QJ1aUty,
Timely and Responsive Service to All
Of Our Customers
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 13, 2009
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a) August 11, 2009 Regular Meeting
b) September 9,2009 Regular Meeting
c) September 15, 2009 Special Meeting
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Variance request to encroach into side yard setback
Applicant: Tom Weber
809 -;:h Street
Farmington, MN 55024
b) Conditional Use Permit to allow an off-premise directional sign at the southeast intersection of 195th Street
and Akin Road
Applicant: Bible Baptist Church
19700 Akin Road
Farmington, MN 55024
c) Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan, Variance Ii: Final Plat- Multiple-Family Senior Housing complex in the
SSC zoning district
Applicant: Dakota County Community Development Agency
1228 Town Centre Dr.
Eagan, MN 55123
d) Ordinance Establishing Downtown Commercial Overlay District (DC) Design Standards
Applicant: Dakota County Community Development Agency
1228 Town Centre Dr.
Eagan, MN 55123
e) Ordinance amending Section 10-6-20 of the City Code concerning Industrial Park Design Standards
Appliqmt: City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
f) Ordinance Repealing Section 10-5-9 concerning the R-4 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning District
Applicant: City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
g) Ordinance Amendment Adding Section 10-5-20 concerning the Mixed Use Commercial I Residential Zoning
District (MUCR)
Applicant: City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
h) Ordinance Amending Section 10-5-1 concerning the Official Zoning Map
Applicant: City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
i) Amend the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map at 1001 Ash Street and 913 10th Street
Applicant: City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
j) Text amendments to the zoning code for the R-1, R-2, R-3, R-5, R- T, and R-D zoning districts concerning
density.
Applicant: City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
k) Amend Section 10-5-5 (C) 2 concerning the Commercial Recreational Uses
Applicant: City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
4. DISCUSSION
a) 2010 Census - Complete Count Committee
5. ADJOURN
Planning Commission
Minutes
Special Meeting
September 15, 2009
1. Call to Order
Chair Rotty called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Vanderbeck, Bonar, Rotty, Kuyper, Stokes
Members Absent: None
Also Present: Tony Wippler - Assistant City Planner, Lee Smick - City Planner
2. Approval of Minutes
None
3. Public Hearings
a) Variance request to reduce the side yard setbacks - Lot 3, Block 3 and Lot 3, Block 2,
East Farmington 8th Addition.
Applicant: John Johnson
Klein Bank
1550 Audubon Road
Chaska, MN 55318
The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach twenty feet into the required side yard setback.
The property is zoned R-2 and the properties in question are required to have the twenty foot
setbacks on two sides due to the fact that they are corner lots. The owners of the property would
like to apply for the variance now in order to be able to take advantage of the $8,000 federal
homebuyer stimulus funding. The lots to the south of these properties are zoned R-2 PUD and
have smaller setback requirements. Staff feels that because the adjacent properties are allowed to
have smaller setbacks this does represent a hardship. MOTION by Vanderbeck second by
Kuyper to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Kuyper
second by Bonar to approve the variance request. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
4. Discussion
None
5. Adjourn
MOTION by Vanderbeck, second by Kuyper to adjourn. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
"""...,
Approved
"
./ (-:-" " ,-.-
Ii ----- '~/ "<
/ Lisa~~gis. . (:J" ~
AdmInIstratIve AssIstant
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 . Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Planning Commission
Lee Smick, City Planner ~
AICP, CNU-Accredited
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Variance from Minimum Front Yard Setback Requirement in the R-2 Zoning District
Thomas Weber, 809 - 7th Street
DATE:
October 13,2009
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Mr. Thomas Weber, 809 _7th Street, is requesting that the Planning Commission review his proposal to locate a
new 832 square foot garage in the rear of his yard (Ex. A). The proposal requires a 14-foot variance to the front
yard setback (Mr. Weber is on a corner lot) in the R-2 zoning district. The code for yards along streets is shown
as follows:
10-4-1: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
(A) Lots which abut on more than one street shall provide the required front yards along each street. Rear yard
setbacks shall not be required on corner lots since side yard setbacks apply.
Mr. Weber's property line along Beech Street is already set in 21 feet from the curb (Ex. B). In fact, most of
the boulevards in this area are 20-21 feet in width. If the variance were not allowed, he would be required to
construct the garage a minimum of 34 feet from the curb, thereby locating the garage towards the middle of his
backyard, diminishing open space in that area.
The Board of Adjustment may vary the regulations of this Title if the following requirements are met:
1. Because the particular physical surroundings, or the shape, configuration, topography, or other
conditions of the specific parcel of land involved, strict adherence to the regulations of this Title
would cause undue hardship. Economic consideration alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of this Title.
The boulevards in this area are 20-21 feet in width, not typical of a newer subdivision with
boulevards at 10 feet in width. If the variance were not allowed, he would be required to construct
the garage a minimum of 34 feet from the curb, thereby locating the garage towards the middle of
his backyard, diminishing open space in that area.
2. The conditions upon which a variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the
variance is sought and are not applicable, generally, to other properties within the same zoning
classification.
The conditions are unique to this area only because other locations in the city have much smaller
boulevard widths.
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Title and has not been created by any persons
presently having an interest in the parcel of land.
The hardship was not created by the applicants or any other person having an interest in the
property.
4. The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or be injurious to
other property in the vicinity in which the parcel of land is located or substantially diminish property
values.
Granting the variance would not alter the character of the area or have a negative impact on other
property in the vicinity.
5. The proposed variance will not substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase
the danger of fire, or be detrimental to the public welfare or public safety.
The proposed variance would not result in any of the above mentioned adverse effects.
6. The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the hardship.
The allowance of a 14-foot setback is the minimum variance that would eliminate the potential
hardship.
ACTION REOUESTED
Recommend approval of the 14-foot variance along Beech Street for the property at 809 _7th Street.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Lee Smick, City Planner
AICP, CNU-Accredited
cc: Thomas Weber
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800. Fax 651.280.6899
www.ciiannington.mn.us
II
VARIANCE APPI..ICATION
II
Applicant: IVW1. lV;eJ':.7<'::.A1- Telephone: (l~)sy-U(y'1-7~.~vFax: <-)
Address: fJtJ&f11-4. .~'f, 1-4I-'rn~1th?A I 111\/
Street C I' State
Owner: ""{;,n11 iA.J eb"p y" Telephone:~S~..tj~i-713bFax:. <-)
Address: W{)'i '7114.///, Farh\J'i.:Jk>1f ~ /"t IV S-:-S--t?:lt+.,
Street City" State Zip Code
/,!. fl_/Il.h'
Premises Involved: ( _I>~ ~ tV,)';'''' nq L!!// i f 6J n
Address! Legal Description (lot, ock, plat name, section, township, range)
Current Zoning District R - ;;.... Current Land Use & '-~ /eI t?I'7,/'t///
IJ fJ 4/}, :5 i:JCiC e ree/tt ~eCl
I
55-(; 1,'+
Zip Code
Specific Nature of Request I Claimed Hardship:
SUBMITTAL REOUIREMENTS
E1!>roof of Ownership
~pplication Fee ($200)
[;}Boundary I LO.t..~.
.~~ =
Signature of'itroperty Owner
lB'topies of Site Plan
o AbstractlResidential List (adjoining property owners only)
o Torrens (Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title Required)
ft/to/!!1
Date Signature of Applicant
Date
Request Submitted to the Planning Commission on
Public Hearing Set for:
For office use only
Advertised in Local Newspaper:
Planning Commission Action:
Approved
Denied
Fee Paid
$200 - City of Farmington
$46 - Dakota County Recorder
Comments:
Conditions Set:
Planning division:
Date:
9/06
'4;~
-rj~l-
d
_.~
\'1
;tl
~~J
;~J
/'7?
,J
J''':-~- l
i
f .;(_ L~, (~)
.,""
'./
, ~.
~.""",/
....".-\..,
/
/fyfil
~.~o~
.~~ . -"'-,..
-- ..-...... : r":"'~.
!.........../ '-_wi
~~.;~~:~..
.r.
" ,
-.-t..".
. ,
./
:-"'j
'--"
~~=:/'
:,- ..:::..'_ t
,j J ,.
/.,,-;
.J;. \.
,
~""'~---1"
/",,;;,.- /-'/ ,;'
YO/e)-
___IL ...
..t---- -----
o:;,;::.y~l ......__ ....__..__.__....__
. '''-_ :6-/ CY_~?~-~7~-;~-_~r_ ._<,~~;...
~. - )- ... ki..{j{?_n3~-..:...,_.f:i=__..J---...- " ~ -'" -~--I;l-c~-
":.~ ---.... . 1 lJ 'f[j ~n'.~ -. j"
. l' <.~, '/lj~ r'
i~_~ ___.u.....______ ...':-::;-;.J., oJ . c-J . ..--- ------
r-.. 1 ....j
....:,7~- . .r:~l!.: ... T-..I .__ .. .._ .... .. ..
..'\.. .....} . __ __ '-__ _ __n.____ ...- .---..---.-....
1
1
. ---- ' -.---.---..... "I'
j
l
I
.L_'.h_'_
/..:....
J
.__..1
'1 ,/
G-...!
l--
r ,) J
_,l--..."1 ' I _ ~\...../ ","/
,....: ._....-=.....-4 .. ~~,=,="O__
\2" 'J. /
-1
i
r
j
I
I
,1
._L
. \...
.~
-")-- '
__'2/..
"-.
~.
i~o
..~:
.
_. ..-=-.J
'. ;)
'--'
t.:.:,:.:":"="~_
.--=----::::,....~
. . . --.- ....--.. "'7/--;'4/ .
-f~" ==-...... r; ,: I _
.~. IJ..A:
1-----,1)<.-=-1
- . .,....-. .
!
tJ !..-
-'''' ...1.(}
.....~
_ . .1
['),,) I
JJj'l'': \: I
l" -,
! !
,',
L
~- ().r'- ..-
1~'r..-2._--.
~
..I
.~
i)....
..."'-.,......
~
\~:;
Print Preview
Page 1 of 1
~~8
Dakota County, MN
ParcellD 1141830005000 I Bathrooms 1.5
Owner Name Weber Thomas I Garage Sq Ft 1440
Joint Owner Other Garage I
Owner Address 809 7Th St Misc. Building
Owner Address 2 Estimated Land Value $40,400
! City/State/Zip Farmington Mn 55024 I Estimated Building Value 1$144,100
Common Name 1809 7TH ST I Total Estimated Value 1$184,500
. Property Address I Tax Capacity 1$2,048
Property City I FARMINGTON Special Assessments $53
Use I Residential Total Property Tax $2,672
Homestead Iy Date of Sale Sunday, June 01,1997
, Year Built 11957 Sale Value $120,000
Effective Year Built 1970 Acres 0.26
Building Type S.FAM.RES I School District 1192
Building Style [ONE STORY I Watershed District IVERMllLlON RIVER
Foundation Sq Ft 11427 I Plat Name I CORRIGANS ADDITION
Finished Sq Ft 12854 I Lot and Block 5
Frame IWOOD I Tax Description I
[ Bedrooms 13 I I
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not
guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,
appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
M9R Scale
1 inch = 64 feet
1......_.II~:~ ~~ rl~lr~+~ ~.~ Hn/mokC';to/rl"lr"t",n"tn;"I",r;ntPrp"ipu, ::J<::ny?PrintOntl}::Jt::J=D::Jkotgi C... 8/3/2009
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 . Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Planning Commission
Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner ;d-
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit - Off-Premises Directional Sign - Bible Baptist Church
DATE:
October 13, 2009
INTRODUCTION I DISCUSSION
Bible Baptist Church is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the purpose of installing a
twenty four (24) square foot (4' x 6') off premises directional sign (Exhibit A). The proposed sign will be
located on vacant property owned by the Church at the southeast intersection of Akin Road and CSAH 64 (195th
Street). The necessity for the church to obtain a the CUP for an off-premises direction sign is due to the fact
that even thought the church owns the property, the church's facilities are not located on the parcel of land
where the sign is to be installed. The reason for the additional signage is to provide added visibility for traffic
along CSAH 64 (195th Street).
The Church did consider the possibility of installing a permanent monument sign at this location. The property
is located within a residential zoning district (R-l) and is allowed one freestanding monument sign per street
frontage provided an access drive is present. In this instance, an access drive is not present on the subject
parcel; therefore, a monument sign is not applicable.
The City Code concerning off-premises directional signs is as follows:
(b) Off Premises Direction Signs: For the purpose of providing off premises direction to a residential
project described in this subsection, or to a new venture less than twelve (12) months following the
issuance of an occupancy permit, or to a public, relie:ious or nonprofit institution, or to a use which,
in the determination of the planning commission, incurs substantial hardship from lack of
reasonable identification as a result of its location, a conditional use permit shall be required. Such
sign shall not exceed twenty five (25) square feet per face and such sign shall conform to the yard
requirements of the zoning district in which it is located. If said sign is lighted, it shall be
illuminated only during those hours when the business is in operation or when the model homes or
other developments are open for conducting business.
The proposed sign meets the square footage requirements of 25 square feet or less (proposed 24 SF). The
required setbacks for the sign are fifty (50') feet from the ROW of 195th Street and twenty (20') feet from the
ROW of Akin Road. The applicant has indicated that the sign will meet these setback requirements.
ACTION REOUESTED
Determine if Bible Baptist Church incurs enough of a hardship to allow the installation of an off-premises
direction sign at the southeast intersection of Akin Road and CSAH 64 (195th Street). If a hardship is
determined to exist by the Planning Commission, approve the Conditional Use Permit with the following
contingencies:
I. The applicant obtains a sign permit prior to the installation of the sign.
2. The applicant coordinates with all small utility companies than may have services in the area to
ensure the placement of the sign is not affecting any of those services.
Respectfully submitted,
-r;~
Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner
Cc: Bible Baptist Church
fx. A-I
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.463.7111 . Fax 651.463.259]
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
m~@~DW~~
W SEP 25 2009 W
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
5 (Sf C[L.l ASI ]>7 ?-r67
Applicant: ..,' IGl e 8A-fTl.s v Ct(v tC-Gt( Telephone: L) V 6 Cl 6 I.{ 7 3 .flat: L)
Address: /9 7 0 0 If-V<t tv' f2-/J _ lAter! "'he!..J fJ1.N C; So -Z y
Street City State Zip Code
Owner: fIBCl: ~ll..PI15~ cuufC-C/l-1 Telephone:~) l(6o 6'(73 Fax: L)
Address: [9 7 0 0 fi-I.<: I IV IZ-I> hvt.JI"1 I tJ' (;"'\0 tV y"\ ;J
Street City State
Current Zoning District
Ct?~f/~ or' 19)0 .>'r. i ItftOtV t2!?
Address/Legal Description (lot, block, plat name, section, township, range)
R1
(Sf.
5'50? y
Zip Code
Cc{l..lVftZ )
Premises Involved:
Current Land Use V4c A-""l
Db(- prz.1(Y\Ue5 {)!(LfGTfi)v-f,L]L- :;((r-i
Specific Nature of Request:
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
o Proof of Ownership
o Application Fee
o Boundary / Lot Survey
~~
o 6 Copies of Site Plan
o Abstract/Residential List (required 350' from subject property)
o Torrens (Owner's Duplicate Certificate ofTitJe Required)
~'1-Z~'l ~ ---:;;
Date . ature of APP~
<j-Z-<(-t? '1
Date
GODFREY'S
4' x 6' one sided sign
Bible Baptist
Church
1/2" white wood sign substrate
6" x 6" cedar posts
tx.A-J.
lX.A-3
GX, A - ~
Dakota County, MN
\, ~6E:NFltAL L.O(A,'ON
\~ 6F $IC....
o
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not
guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,
appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Map_S~ale
1 inch = 200 feet
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 . Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Planning Commission
Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner ,/?'J-
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Vermillion River Crossing Senior Housing
1. Site Plan & Conditional Use Permit application
2. Variance application to off-street parking requirement
3. Final Plat
DATE:
October 13, 2009
INTRODUCTION
The Dakota County Community Development Agency [CDA] has submitted the following documents for review by the
Planning Commission:
1. Site Plan & Conditional Use Permit
2. Variance to off-street parking requirement
3. Final Plat - Vermillion River Crossings Senior Housing
Planning Division Review
Applicant:
Dakota County Community Development Agency
1228 Town Centre Drive
Eagan, MN 55123
Property Owner:
land LLC
25929 lpava Avenue
Lakeville, MN 55044
Attachments:
1) Exhibit A - Architectural Site Plan
2) Exhibit Al - Floor Plan
3) Exhibit A2 & A3 - Exterior Elevations
4) Exhibit B - Landscape Plan
5) Exhibit C - Grading, Drainage and Utility Plan
6) Exhibit C 1 - Site Details
7) Exhibit D - Final Plat
8) Exhibit E - Architectural Rendering
9) Exhibit F - Applicants preferred dumpster location
Location of Property:
Northeast intersection of Dushane Parkway and Spruce Street in the Vermillion River
Crossings development.
Legal Description:
Outlot F, Vermillion River Crossings
Existing Zoning:
Spruce Street Commercial [SSe]
Comprehensive Plan:
Commercial
Current Land Use:
Vacant land
Proposed Land Use:
60 unit senior housing development with the potential for an additional 12 units.
DISCUSSION
The Dakota County CDA is the contract purchaser of Outlot F, Vermillion River Crossings and the applicant of the
aforementioned applications.
The proposal consists of the construction of a 93,800 square foot (foundation square footage of 23,800), 60 room senior
housing complex. The site plan shows the potential to add an additional 12 units on the northern end of the proposed
building.
Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review
Proposed Use
The proposed use of this property (senior housing complex) is considered a multiple-family dwelling as defined in the
Zoning Code. Multiple-family dwellings are a conditional use in the Spruce Street Commercial District [SSe]. A
conditional use permit shall be approved by the Planning Commission if it is found to meet the following criteria:
1. The proposed use conforms to the district permitted and conditional use provisions and all general regulations of
this title.
2. The proposed use shall not involve any element or cause any conditions that may be dangerous, injurious or
noxious to any other property or persons and shall comply with the performance standards listed below.
3. The proposed use shall be constructed, designed, sited, oriented and landscaped to produce harmonious
relationship of buildings and grounds to adjacent buildings and properties.
4. The proposed use shall produce a total visual impression and environment which is consistent with the
environment of the neighborhood.
5. The proposed use shall organize vehicular access and parking to minimize traffic congestion in the neighborhood.
6. The proposed use shall preserve the objectives of this title and shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
It is staff s opinion that all of the above mentioned criteria have been or will be met with this proposal.
Setbacks & Lot Coverage
The minimum setback requirements for the Spruce Street Commercial District are as follows:
Front Yard:
At least 50 percent of the building front shall be within 20 feet of the public right of way or
private street edge.
Side Yard:
No requirement
Rear Yard:
20 feet
The location of the building as shown on the site plan does not meet the required front yard setback as identified above.
The proposed setbacks from the Dushane Parkway ROW range from twenty-nine (29') feet to thirty-seven (37') feet. The
proposed setbacks from the Spruce Street ROW vary from eighteen (18') feet to approximately thirty (30') feet.
It is staffs interpretation that the front yard setback requirement in the SSC District is more appropriate for
commercial/retail users which depend on pedestrian traffic, thereby necessitating a reduced front yard setback. Due to the
proposed use (senior housing complex) of this property and its proximity to what will eventually be two highly traveled
roads, staff is comfortable with the building setbacks shown from the right-of-ways of Dushane Parkway and Spruce
Street. All other setbacks have been met with this proposal.
The lot coverage (building coverage only) is proposed to be approximately 22.39% and 25.78% with the optional 12 unit
addition. There are no required lot coverage requirements in the SSC zoning district.
Transportation, Off-street Parking & Variance Request
Access to the site is proposed to come off of Dushane Parkway only. The access drive is located adjacent to the northern
property line of the subject property. It should be noted that this access is a shared access with the lot directly north of
this parcel (Lot 1, Block 3, Vermillion River Crossings). An access agreement will need to be executed with the owner of
Lot 1, Block 3 to allow access from Dushane Parkway through the CDA's parcel.
A 15 foot wide sidewalk is shown along Dushane Parkway that would match the Landscaping and Amenity Areas Plan
that was approved in 2006. The City has requested that this sidewalk be revised to a 7.67' wide sidewalk that would
consist of five (5') feet of concrete surrounded by sixteen (16") inches of pavers on each side of the concrete. This is
similar to what is currently being installed adjacent to the McDonalds site to the north. There is an existing sidewalk
along Spruce Street.
A parking lot is shown in the rear of the lot behind the proposed building. A total of28 off-street parking stalls, including
4 handicapped accessible, are provided in the parking lot. Additionally, underground parking is being proposed with this
project with access to the underground parking coming from the parking lot area entering from the east side of the
proposed building. It is anticipated that I off-street parking stall will be provided in the underground parking area for
each unit. Therefore, a total of 88 off-street parking stalls (100 stalls if expansion area is added) will be provided on site.
Section 10-6-4 of the City Code requires that 2.5 parking stalls be provided for each unit within a multiple-family
development. With strict adherence to the code, the CDA would be required to provide 150 off-street stalls (180 off-street
stalls with the expansion area). The CDA has applied for a variance to reduce the off-street parking requirement for this
development from 2.5 stalls per unit to 1.45 stalls per unit. The applicant has historical data as the owner of 20 similar
senior housing developments in Dakota County that shows 1.45 off-street stalls per unit are adequate for a senior housing
building. This data can be provided to the Planning Commission upon request. The Board of Adjustment may vary the
regulations of this title if all of the following requirements are met:
I. Because the particular physical surroundings, or shape, configuration, topography , or other conditions of the
specific parcel of land involved, strict adherence to the regulations of this title would cause undue hardship.
Economic consideration alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists
under the terms of this title.
2. The conditions upon which a variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought
and are not applicable, generally, to other properties within the same zoning classification.
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this title and has not been created by any persons presently having
an interest in the parcel of land.
4. The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality or be injurious to other property in
the vicinity in which the parcel of land is located or substantially diminish property values.
5. The proposed variance will not substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of
fire, or be detrimental to the public welfare or public safety.
6. The requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate the hardship.
It is staffs opinion that the variance request meets the requirements specified above. Additionally, staff is comfortable
with the amount of parking that is proposed for this development, and will be recommending approval of the variance.
Solid Waste
The applicant has indicated that the intent is to store the garbage containers within the underground parking area and then
move them to the outside of the building on the days the garbage gets collected. This may not be feasible.
Attached as Exhibit F, is a revised site plan showing the CDA's preferred location for the dumpster. This location will not
work as the City's collection trucks are automated to lift the garbage containers for emptying on the right side of the truck.
This location would require the garbage trucks to back down the steep drive in order to collect the garbage. It may be
necessary to have a permanent outdoor garbage enclosure. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to find a suitable
solution to this issue. It will need to be addressed prior to final construction plans being prepared and submitted.
Building Elevations
Section 10-6-21 of the City Code requires that certain architectural standards apply to buildings within the Spruce Street
Commercial District. The Spruce Street Commercial District Design Standards are attached as Exhibit D. As shown on
Exhibit B 1, the exterior of the building will consist of a combination of cultured stone, brick, lap siding, and cement board
panels. An architectural rendering is attached as Exhibit E.
The height of the proposed building to the ridge of its roof is approximately 39 feet. The height of the clock tower is
approximately 40 feet. The maximum height that is allowed in the SSC is 40 feet.
Site Amenity
As part of the required site amenities specified in the SSC Design Standards, the CDA is proposing a plaza to be located at
the corner of Dushane Parkway and Spruce Street.
Signage
Two monument signs are shown on the site plan (one off of Dushane Parkway and one off of Spruce Street). Being this
property is a corner lot; it is allowed two monument signs. The proposed signs do meet the size requirements as outlined
in Section 10-6-3 of the City Code. The location of the sign along Spruce Street will have to be revised (currently shown
overhanging onto City ROW). All monument signs must be setback a minimum often (10') feet from all property lines.
Landscaoe Plan
A landscape plan is attached as Exhibit B, and has been reviewed by the City Planner. The landscape plan is acceptable,
however, the applicant will need to ensure that the trees to be planted along Dushane Parkway and Spruce Street are
planted a minimum of forty (40') feet on center.
Eneineerinv
The Engineering Department has reviewed the submitted documents and has provided comments to the applicant. The
Engineering Department has recommended to the Planning staff that the applications be approved contingent upon
satisfaction of all Engineering and Planning Comments.
Final Plat - Vermillion River Crossines Senior Housine
The CDA has submitted the Final Plat for Vermillion River Crossings Senior Housing, located south of CSAH 50, north
of Spruce Street and west of Denmark Avenue (Ex. D). All easements identified on the final plat are of adequate size.
Additionally, the final plat document shows a thirty (30') foot wide Drainage, Utility and Access easement along the very
northern property line. The fmal plat includes the platting of Outlot F. Approval of the final plat will be contingent upon
the execution of a Development Agreement.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of the following applications:
1. Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit subject to the following contingency:
a. Satisfaction of all Engineering and Planning comments.
2. Final Plat subject to the following contingency:
a. The execution of a Development Agreement.
3. Variance to the off-street parking requirement.
Please forward the recommendation of the final plat onto the City Council for its consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner
Cc: Kari Gill, Dakota County Community Development Agency
Kirk Velett, InSite Architects
I
~A
':i
~~
i/!=
~
~
1;~ ;:
0
~i J
/\ U
h
I
---------------)---
~-I
I
o~ I
~~ I
I
- ~-~
-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
__-.J
h
~
,--------
1;-
; ~g~
~ (I)....""tl
~~~
~~~
13>m
~
Vermillion Crossing Senior Housing
DAKOTA COUNTY CDA
Farmington, Minnesota
1e f' ~!!I!
!'I,q
Hil
, !H
1'1'
."0]-
~ i i
A r "
iU ~ II I
i~l a ~
)> ~ ~~
C>~ U
Li ~~
I
f~f\1
\
\
\
, \
" \
\ \\\
" \
'\\\\
, \
"\, \
, \
\~\
, \
, \
'\\\\
\ \
, \
\ \\
\ \
'~--=--=-=-==.:--=-=--=---=--=-=--.:.==-=-=_-:_=-=-==.:--=-=--:_-:-=-=--.:.=--=-=-=
(!8
~:
.
----------------------)-
-----,
I
I
I
0'
U I
I
I
I
------~
~-
I
I
I
o
\
,
\
\
\
-i=[O
Ii t
ill ~
i~; a
~
Vermillion Crossing Senior Housing
DAKOTA COUNTY CDA
Farmington, Minnesota
~~ f.~mi
I - Hit
-I\'
1 ! ,!
1'1'
)>
. i6'
! '!l
, f
~
I
I:~
)4'.l1li" ROa' HlOi"C*'It
I:~
:j 1:-
~j
..
! ;
?(
I ~
~ ;
~
tNA2.
)>
1'0
=~
i
I
I
,,~
~~
~
I
~
~
~Q~
m=<!"'tI
~~~
~~~
~>m
~
Vermillion Crossing Senior Housing
DAKOTA COUNTY CDA
Farmington, Minnesota
~E f' HlI
I ~Fi
,. 1'1'11
I.,
'\
PIOJ~:
jh ~
!if il
iL ~
ii; g.
I
1:;~
Ex--:1f 3
1:;~
~~ ~-
~
-<
I
~
~
1:;~
:1
-<
~~
I
':
:21
I
~
;
)>
(J.)
~Q~
{b"::<>l
&~s:
!ll ~~
(.o)::jm
~~~
~
Vermillion Crossing Senior Housing
DAKOTA COUNTY CDA
Farmington, Minnesota
lF1 r ill!
1 Uil
!Ill
qi
.t~rn-'
Ii !
ill ~
i~; ~
\ ~ i1i (,) ~aJ 1 J
:;:
, ~ II , I t
, I ...
j . ! , I
, ,
i i ~~ 1 1
. .
~ H , . .
,
, i, , ~ I
" 1
. Hi i f
~.
.
!
-;U~.8R.~
~:~iJ~i!l!
~ ~~ii<>-~i
, -i~ r~~
I
N~..<C~.. ~OEK~~~-Z
IZ~llli=li~i:!~f~~[
5~ ~i~~tif@~Wi!y~~~
~ rli:!I~ii!~~!i~il
~ ~~~ ~ ~~i ~ 3~
I s i ,,- "- i ~
I ~ it
",
.
~g
".
i, J
~I I
hhHhl
m i ~ ;J~ ~"
~~'~i~i"g~~
i~ .~
'rl"lriill"lrllll~ill'I~11
i:"..l;llfi"il,i!:;~ 1f~_~";iii~~Ei_i'!B
~i~il.ri~i ~.iti~i!~~i~ri~.
i';i~aSi~! ii""g ~ ~ -i ~~!~
&':i :~~ ! &' < ~ I
~~~~o~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~w~~w~ww~~~
l' 3:' fP" "'
. ~ 11 Hir ~
'.i '[ ~"'f ~
r. "s..l. ..
'l I, U" ·
H ~I lil~ J
~.. l.t '15 ~ I
ir = l I.. 9 ::l,
I ~~. ~ H i
H i" ~'l i;
". ~ I p.,
i!;1 , ".I,~.
![ ~ W I
i.. ". i .g.
i.!" 1 .~i
'I ~ ~~ i.
L , ,~_
f j I ! ji
~.; ~ !l~
~.~ i. K,l
i= . l.,J
~i ' 1~:
1. I .,q
d .! p,
h ' Ii'
[i t '1
!; t~~ l~!i f~
~! · h [l [!!
Kt jg L i ~,q'
n IU ~! I.~
,~.-i; It ~. ~~
"I "" .. .'
it ~i ~! ;. it
'j l. .. ",~
i~ H H ! If
t j' ,l . 'r
~ · i '1.1 f ~"
~ f.~ M ~ g;; i
i ..~ l.f 1 [.
, r' 't ~ ~[
i li i.l' dl
~ '". .. iiI.i f
i ~~ H ~"I"j
I [. I ~
i Ii r~ i" I
i ~i ~.i a i
6' II .. ~ J: <>
~ {[ I L ~ ~
l.i; ! { ,
r-
[ ~~>
]. ""i>~
't-?
~ o'\-
Vermillion Crossing Senior Housing
DAKOTA COUNTY CDA
Farmington, Minnesota
.,.........
.~~~-----
~~ !UU~ ~lU~ !ilU~ ~ ~~~ dl ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~
_N"'N",,,,,,,,,,,,,
,.. -.....
0""000000
........ .
""nnnnnn"
........ .
SSIlllSS88S
~ a 3. a 3. 3. 3. 3. 3.
~!!!~!!~~!!!!::::: m
iiiiiiiiiiiiilllllllllllll
,,",'.. .
;~~~;?~?;
~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~;; :
J ii 'i if it It
; ll. ;1 fi i;'1
J ~ ~ i li,," i r 1
~ ~! ~~ 1-1 j,
f'...I,ll;
! h 'i · I; ~~
Ii -if · ~ H 'i
~ il.. t.: ~l .ii
I 1 H it H t!
l; " ~~ ]" l'
~"";'1']~
I i.l:~ ~~ ,I H
[;'!~iai~i
; }! H 1; !~
r j ~ l~ H H
J : ii ~~ ~.[ ;f
~ ~i h h IJ
< U ~ to It
I ". i ,l~ ·
f 8 i iiI" 8
~.! l. l. 1
i '~, ,
,! !
H
H
;L~
(jl'--
~
'F - F-
m 'li'
'l~ ! ~a
! I 'I"
OJ: . i-I
,- i 3~.
i ~ , U'
l..i. 1 ",1
~ ~ ; ~ ~;.
Ii ! . ~~
l~ ., h.
" 1 . "
i' ! ~l ~
~t ~ ci:i
n: H
"r I ~~
! 1 l ~ i
~~ j t:
" n
11 ..
Ii [~
l." {.
i! ~ i
~~---,
~';'ooo
??;:;:;:
H'
t~r
~ .!!. 9.
! ,I
~~'-
~ 1;.
! "I
li1
i~t
H.
rH
Hi
F1
.[t
1"1
~.
ir1
, r'.
. ,
; ,
g .!!.~
."II.:
ti~'
1:1&
'" ,
~~!
~!~
~ii
Ex.B
J
I
~~
p
~
~
,
~
?
~.
~
'!;i lit' 'I
H 11 '",'11 h.
I' 'I 1
'! " (! 'I
t;! 'I i I!.
t{ j I I
. t
'[" "J
h! i
h'
'if J I
'''" i;
Hi ,
..~ l I
H.i. ~ I
u: i.
... ~
LIJ !:
J.B i'J
:;~l ~
,. ~ '
UP,
,~. f
.". 1-
~h [
· ~ ~ i
hi
g Ii- ~
U'
." .
~~ j
". ",- " 1- ~"' 1f" " Ii'f" I
Ir tr [~r ti' ,r ~I~ . 'r ~ lit .r
H H t!~ .~ &' ~.. f ., .. j", ,
H ..~ ! r! ti ~i d. ~ Iff.1 f ~~hi
a ~.~ 1~i: i' tic IIi ! Ii; . l!..t I
I,I ~,! ~.'~~.- .i II f~l ,l~! i {~~~l
. I '.~ H. at H' ',Ii- ; JIH
.' il; Hi L i' ,.i "l~ · "'~~.
1 J ..~ ~l .j iH i}<[ t !;,~,
, II II, Ii II !il ,,~lr I Iltlt
I 'I iti 1; g. ~.~ 'l.' 1 ~,,'1
~, ~.~. il f" i",~ ; ..rl.
~ i~ !~il ti ~I !t~l- ~ii~ i. if!r'l
~ g~ 0 Ie )loll sa, 5,i ~""2.~ ~::fSa
· "I ~.; t"' ~f I'. ~.!l, ,'"
I o! "., 'f ~'. ~."l 'H"
t !1 tH j H i~'l".d" t Bt!l.
, .] '!' "<. -, ~",. .~"';
z l, ~, . h !. 'l f'.I' <l.t"-l'
~ l' [Ii f t[ '!i ~'l-i ~ t,.~
~ ~i '1:1 g ii; ;;~~ "'" ;!.~
"i.~ i "., "- i'~ Fl,~
i: l ~ ~. i; t F i <I. a i ! [~;
~ ~~ ..~ ~ i. !!.i'g. i'1" ~iJ.rf
~ ii ~i f J '~i ~t~ 1~i~
{I' .! - I " '" II. .;
i" I l ~ 1, "! .l
1 ", ,!W
;. '.ail!
.~ :E.~ ".w
~ i ;' HH
~~ · !'II
f, ,II
~
;!~
(i;,;~".)"
II!
i
If
. I'T1
Z
.. "
, Z
.
. I'T1
1'T1c...
l~ ::0)>
. Ul(")
Ji p:>O
CD
i! UlUl
cO
::oZ
~
~ d
, ::0
~ Ul
~:::::5'
~9~
iil
;<'.
z"O~
~o.
~;>
~~
?Z~
00
~~
C.
.....0
-<:u
"J!:
....Z
>>
ZG'>
'"
~rii
:I:~~
gzF
!!lfJ5
Z Z
G)~AJ
Z-
~~
~.C-
911.5
-"'- "-
~~~"~
~~~
~_~~____m________________'
--~-
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~\~l\
~\ Hi!
~q
~~ g
8H
~- ~
~ ~
H
. ~
~ ~
~ ..
~
i: f
l
~ ~ ~ ~ .} ~ ~ .; ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F F . - - - 8 e e ~ e .
~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ J ~ ~~. J ~ . - ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ; i ~g ~ ~ ;~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~~~
~ ~ . a ~ a C F ~ ~~ >a~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ C ~ ~ ~
. c ~ ffl ~ :lE ~ III B"'l i f!l' 2c~ t:) E III 5l =<! :t: 5 o~rn
_ z > ~ . ~ ~,~ ~ ~.~ . " i 0 z ~ ~ "..
~ rn ~ ~ ~ " ~ 0 ~ ~. ? ~ ".i ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~=~
~ ~ ; ~ ~ a ~ " ~ ~o ~ ~ ~a~ > : ~ ~ · ~ ~ ~~.
~ F ~ p . ~ ~ ~ ! ~! ~ ; ~~F ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~;~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ a E a ~ .~~ i ~ ~ ~ ; ~ .~~
. ~ ~" ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ g : m ~ ~; ~~
~ ~ p ffi e :; ~ ~ ~ F.~ z ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
. ~ ~ ~" . c . .,0 0 ~ ;;;, ~ 1"" iii
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~8
. z AA ~ "~ ~:l. '~F ~ ~ · ~ o.
~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ a ~ E~~ ~ 2 F ~ i ~~
8 ~ ~ ~ ~ e ;~2 " ~ ~ ~ ~~
. ~ c C . >" ~, ~ ~ OF
~ . 2 ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ' ~8
. ~ . AA~ ~ ~ 01 ~~
_ ~~ ~. 8~
8 p i~
.~
tl
~l
~~
~9
Q<
;1
f
I ,
I I
I I
~ r
~ I
I I
I I
I !
\) @. ~ ~ ~ 111
\ III
Ii
I iH~H~~
~ ~~~~~~~~
~ ~; ;;~n
8 n ~~~~~
:G ! ~ 2 !f ~",
~ "
~
[!
~
~ ~ 11 J
~ ~ ~ ~
~ !i! ~
~ ~ 2
~
~
z E~ ~~ !" <II
~~~~ ~ ~.~ J o.'i v !; 1: ~-
~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~. ~~ ~8~ ~ ~~v v
.~=~ 'I ~~! ~ oU ~~ ~.~ ~ !12~ ~
~~i~ ~ i~o ~ ~8~ ~'1 ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~
~. ~~ "~~ ~ ~U ~: ~.;;! ~ ~~~ ::
.~~~ ~ ~. ~ ~o~ ~~ ~~~ . ~~8 ~ i
8980 ~ o~ ~ o~~ o~ ~o~ : ~~~ ~ ~
~~S~ ~ ~~ I ~@~ ~i ~~g ~ ~~~ Ii ~
~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ p~ ~~! & d ~ ~
o ,,~o ~i z .~~ . z~a g .~! - ~
~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ :~~ ~ :~~ ~ ~~~ ~ i
~z~~' ~ . c,. ~ .8i1 ~ ~~- ~ ~
. :~~ i ~~ ~ ~i~ . ~~: · ~~8 ~ 0
.~~ ~ ~! ~ ~~ ~ ~~. ~ ~.6 p
S~~ ~ ~~! g~ i ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~
;~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ J ~~g ~ ~~; ~
~~~! ! I~ ~ i'~ ~~~
~f A 0 ;~ ~ "i~ ~gm
~!; ~pl
~:<
~ ~
1; ~ ; i'
a ~ HI i .'
~ (J) i ~. ~ l' 1m
!;; fT1 a ~.'~ 01
(). a ~ ~~ ~
g ~ . ~ .; ~
z ~ ~ ~ tl
" i~ Pi
. ~ .
~ ~ "
I
~
!
~
Ii
~.",
a
"
~i
;~
~!
:.~
i~
a
(Tl
Z
~
Z
(Tl
(Tlc..
~. ::0>
~~ UlO
II ~ g
,~ ~~
::oZ
j$j
6
::0
Ul
~~
~;". i8";;' a u
.. 1l~~ ",U.:;.oU au:
-~" !!l !~!1;! Ii
.
"
.!!
.
~
~::::J
~gJl!
~;:e;
~~g.
~~[
s:~1lI
a~
fi
~ i
!t
Vl
i;j
o
'"
~
r
(J)
Ht:i'
j~~:;
lHI
~ !~
~ !~
~ ~~
If) jJln
S
l>
[]~ ~[]"i
\ i "'l
~ a' '!
! t~f
I
:J
if
~l
1
Ill! m
I
II !!
~a
!
I~
I] .~
l! j!~ I 0"
!, I-"
~i ~
LJWL, "
m ! ! HE
p' I " ""I'
"f I i ni~
: ~ ~
! i i
~
~
~
I
I
1-"
I
L___
'--------T
I
~----------------------I
/ / I 30
// I
~~~~ / I
p~ // I
// I
/ I
// ~ I
/ ... I
/ C) r I
\ 0 0
\ ~ -t I~
\ (> ,^ ~ I 38.75
\ <,.... I NORTH
\ 0 I
\\ ,^ I
\ /, I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
~~-q, \
~~~ \ I
~~ I
~ \ I
L_______________________~
~ ::;l!l
. 0'
~~~"
h~~
=~~:
hi~
8H~
~~~g
/~a!
:-' z 1'\
~
~
~
L--f
i---r" n_ !
r---10 0 ~
I .
I ~
0,
c;<,,>
'c;>.
\
\
\
ouon.o-:- H
~
.,
0'
! I: z
; : , 0
J J I~'
f ~ ~
~ ~ ~
ii:: Vl ~
i ~!
" , .
j ~ ;
Hi
~ .
; I
~ ,.
. 0,
.[1
q,
I~ ~ :
~ ~
!io
;! a j'f
g
3 H'
i ~j
~ ' 0
t-> ~ i.
~ ~U
~ '. ~
~ if f
~.~ .[ ~
~ It ~
.. ~
!
"
VI
I
'"
'"
-l
!H
i~i
~I ;
. .
j! ~
I'l'l
~~
g . ~
~I
I rJ
, ~
11= !!l
Q.~
f
~
i
~
>
g
3
~
~
- ~
! >
\ g
! ~ 3
.. .
~. ~
~ ~
~
~
l
o
."
'" ,., ".
vv' c.'-"
NORTH
300.93
291.98
NORTH
.~Z
I~;
itgi
:~~
~~~
g~;
~;~
'2..~ l:!
'''''
.f!.
i~~
is[
~li
n~
"",~3:
~-g~
i~~
,,~
~ig
~~
~~
!~ ~ff~
~; :~~
~. '.,
;u !f~
~~ :~~
f: ~~ ~
i: m
I~ ~~ ~
.....<1:-:1
i..
8[~
~..,o
m
m
Hi
.
. i ~
,"
i< 0'
.-
o. "
00
~5 I'
"
t~ ~ ;
>, f;\2
.. ~;
!iE
.. P
.. ,!
~~ , ~
'~
.
~
~
;
o
c:
-j
o
-j
~
(""\1'-'-1"''-
vv I LVI \J
~j r-
-;I;
~Ul
~-I
00
~~ -1
(.IJ
I
I
I
I
t--
\
~~
Z=/
,
1-
~" / 10"
i~ '/, r
-;, 0
"
h ":;
~~ ~
Ii 10(- "'
s(- :>0
c,. -;,
> i
>
g
~
~
~
~
n.
i;
-".~
H
~g
~l
,f !
- i
.
,.
~ j
3
"
,
~I
j
'.
.;"0
~-
f
.
,
.
,0
1
3
J
~
~
~
~
"
J
~
,.
I ~ e
0' 3
! ~I
,
i
~ .
i; f
m~m
~~o.l.'
~g~3'" ~a
~~[~~~[
c .
I
. .
n
~ l
<0
i;
0"
if
w~
".
:if
{
ZK.v
<
fIl
:::0
~
r
r
o
z
:::0
<
fIl
:::0
o
:::0
o
(/)
(/)
Z
C)
U)
U)
fIl
Z
o
:::0
I
o
c
U)
z
C)
,
Ii
II
~
~ ~
~iE
()~o
~I~
8~~
> !2!
GJ
f
......
f
2
[
~.
O'l
~
~
~
Lx.~
. ','.~. ,."
"
, "~'rE.~lt
~,,~~
.~~~
"~;i~~
::i;,/'...._:,
;~l
~\~~
-5:>
'." .'.', ~.. 'f~
"J~:~f>}~~
" ~'.- .~. .i
C'.,-;,~.~~
'i~.
._';~
Ex.~
1-
:~
~I~
i~
~
,~
I'
to;
~i
('"
f~
!
o
.
~~
!~
- )
-~
iEh
I ~~
I
>
o
, t
~n
d
~;i;
T_
~~
~
i If g)ii
~ <tl -<"'\J
i~~
w~iji
~>iii
~
iE ~mn!l
i fwllli
-I'rn-'
; I ;,.
, r ~
III 9-
~ . ;
i~t a
Vermillion Crossing Senior Housing
DAKOTA COUNTY CDA
Farmington, Minnesota
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.463.7111 . Fax 651.463.2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Planning Commission
FROM:
Lee Smick, City Planner I.tfl--
AICP, CNU-Accredited
SUBJECT: Ordinance Establishing Downtown Commercial District Overlay Design
Standards
DATE: October 13,2009
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Staff is proposing the attached ordinance defining the requirements for the Downtown
Commercial Overlay District's (DC) design standards as mapped on Exhibit A. Staff met with
the EDA on September 28, 2009 where the proposed ordinance was reviewed. Minor changes to
the ordinance are highlighted in yellow after comments were received from the EDA (Exhibit B).
The design standards pertain to commercial buildings that are new, renovated, or added to an
existing commercial building in the DC zoning district. The DC Overlay District is the property
located south of the Vermillion River, west of 4th Street, north of Walnut Street and east of 1 st
Street. The underlying zones of B-2, B-3 and R-T are still applicable when reviewing permitted
and conditional uses, bulk requirements, and setbacks. This design ordinance will address any
existing or proposed commercial buildings in these underlying zones.
Projecting signs will be allowed as required in the Spruce Street Corridor language un Section
10-6-3 (B)5(e) of this chapter (Exhibit C).
ACTION REOUESTED
Recommend approval of the amendment to add Section 10-6-28 concerning the Downtown
Commercial Overlay District Design Standards and forward the recommendation to the City
Council.
ee Smick, City er
AICP, CNU-Accredited
ex.s
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 6 OF THE
FARMINGTON CITY CODE, THE FARMINGTON ZONING
ORDINANCE, CONCERNING DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL
OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Title 10, chapter 6 of the Farmington City Code, is hereby amended by
adding a new section 28 to read as follows:
10-6-28: Downtown Commercial Overlay District Design Standards
(A) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish design standards pertaining to
the commercial buildings in the downtown commercial district. The design standards are
intended to do the following:
1. Encourage integrated site planning to create a cohesive. sustainable built
environment.
2. Maintain and reinforce "small town" and "Main Street" architectural traditions.
3. Encourage an active. walkable. pedestrian environment.
4. Maintain the character of historic buildings.
5. Unify and articulate building facades.
6. Place a strong visual emphasis on streetscapes.
7. Require new construction to be compatible with existing buildings.
8. Provide for the compatible integration of commercial and residential uses located
on the edge of the downtown commercial district.
9. Encourage replacement or remodeling of architecturally incompatible buildings.
10. Adaptively reuse older buildings that contribute to the district's sense of time and
place.
11. Encourage the development of pocket parks. gardens. plazas. and courtyards for
public use.
12. Establish well-defined transitions (mixed use buildings) between the downtown
and adjacent neighborhoods.
(B) Overlay District Boundary. The Downtown Commercial Overlay District (DC) is
described as the property located south of the Vermillion River. west of 4th Street. north
of Walnut Street and east of 1 st Street.
1
(C) Process. The Downtown Commercial Overlay District Design Standards will be
administered through the Site Plan Process in Section 10-6-23 and. if required under Title
2. Chapter 11. the Design Review Process in Section 2-11-S of the City Code.
(D) Applicability. 1. All new construction and renovations or additions of existing
commercial structures in the DC district will be required to meet the standards in this
chapter. unless otherwise provided. Proiects exempt from meeting the standards are
those commercial buildings that are comprised of any of the following project types:
1. Interior remodels. and
2. Buildings used solely for residential purposes:
3. Normal or routine maintenance and repair of existing structures:
4. Construction that does not require a building permit.
(E) Building Material and Design
1. In the case of new construction. renovations. or additions. 70% or more of the total
surface area of exterior walls exposed to public view shall consist of a mixture of two
or more of the predominant downtown finish materials (clay. brick. stucco. natural
stone. ornamental concrete: except for portions of exterior walls not visible from the
public viewshed). Extruded metal storefront framing may be used only on window or
door frames.
2. Transparent glass must comprise a minimum of 50% (but shall not exceed 75%) of
the total wall area of the first floor elevation on the primary facade: transparent glass
or facade openings shall comprise a minimum of 20% (but shall not exceed SO%) of
the total wall area on the upper floor elevation of any street facade: upper-story
windows will be vertically proportioned and have the visual appearance of traditional
double-hung sash.
3. Blank. windowless walls shall be avoided wherever possible.
4. Exterior walls shall not be covered with metal panels. EIFS (exterior insulation &
finish system). vinyl siding. faux half-timbering. logs. shakes. shingles. exposed
aggregate. or poured-in-place concrete.
5. Pre-assembled clay brick panels. artificial stucco. decorative pre-cast units
resembling stone. and other modern materials may be used that similarly match the
appearance of historic materials.
6. Standardized corporate or "trademark" commercial building types shall be
constructed to meet the architectural style of the downtown. which includes building
materials. glass. color. and signage.
2
7. The ground or street level of a building shall be visually distinguished from the
upper level(s) through the use of colors and/or building materials.
8. Imitation of historical styles shall be encouraged in new construction and
renovation of existing buildings; references to historic architectural styles and periods
will be interpreted in a contemporary manner; new and renovated buildings shall
reinforce and not compete with heritage landmark properties.
9. New commercial buildings shall solidify the relationship between old and new
buildings and support a human-scaled. street-oriented downtown environment. Infill
construction on side streets shall be designed with architectural features such as brick
facades.
10. The massing and bulk of new buildings shall be mitigated by varied massing and
proper articulation of street facades. Large "big box" commercial buildings shall be
designed to appear as multiple storefronts by breaking the facade into smaller bays of
20 feet in width in order to maintain a pattern integrate similar to surrounding
buildings.
11. The size. scale. massing. and facade materials of new construction will
complement the architectural character of existing historic buildings identified as
heritage landmarks.
12. Corner buildings shall be designed with two street facades and a main entrance
on both sides.
13. The maximum height of new construction shall be 45 feet.
14. Roof lines shall be flat or gently sloping.
(F) Awnings/Canopy
1. Awnings/canopies shall be allowed over the first floor windows and along the
frontage of all building entrances.
2. Awnings and canopies shall not project more than five feet (5') into the public
right of way. except where located above an entrance. in which case the maximum
proiection shall not exceed eight feet (8'). Awnings and canopies may not be
supported by poles or other structural elements located in the public right of way.
3. Length: Awnings and canopies should emphasize the rhythm of the facade bays.
windows and entrances. and shall not continue uninterrupted along the building
facade.
4. Height: The bottom of awnings and canopies should be at least eight feet (8')
above sidewalk grade.
3
5. Illumination: Backlit awnings and canopies are not permitted.
6. Inscription: Lettering on awnings and canopies shall comply with subsection 10-6-
3(B)I(k) of this chapter. (k) Awning Signs: Signs consisting of one line ofletters not
exceeding nine inches (9") in height may be painted or placed upon the hanging
border only of an awning. An identification emblem. insignia. initial or other similar
design. not exceeding eight (8) square feet in area may be painted or placed elsewhere
on an awnmg.
7. Materials: Awning and canopy materials should be limited to cotton. acrylic or
vinyl coated cotton. copper or bronze coated metal. or clear glass. Awnings shall be
designed with a slope. No horizontal awnings are allowed. Structural supports shall
be constructed of steel and/or aluminum and shall (if or where visible) incorporate
ornamental features.
8. Signs on historic landmark buildings must (1) not cause damage to historic
architectural features or building materials as a result of installation: and (2) should
be designed and installed in such a manner that when they are removed or replaced
there is no physical evidence of their former presence. In other words. holes may not
be drilled in historic masonry. alterations may not be made of historic character-
defining windows or doors. and no fasteners may be attached to any historic trim.
(G) Parking Areas
1. Required off-street parking shall be provided by spaces at the rear or sides of a
building and provided with architecturally compatible security lighting. and screened
with landscape buffers or low walls.
2. Underground and structured parking shall be encouraged and new parking
structures shall be compatible with (but not indistinguishable from) adjacent buildings
in terms of height. scale. massing. and materials.
(H) Landscaping
1. Landscaping within the Downtown Commercial Overlay District shall comply
with Section 10-6-10 of the City Code.
(1) Screening
1. Screening of service yards. refuse. and waste removal areas. loading docks. truck
parking areas and other areas which tend to be unsightly shall be accomplished by use
of walls. fencing. dense planting. or any combination of these elements. Screening
shall block views from public rights of way. private street and off street parking areas.
and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. Chainlink and slatted fencing are
prohibited.
4
2. Mechanical equipment. satellite dishes. and other utility hardware. whether located
on the roof or exterior of the building or on the ground adiacent to it. shall be
screened from the public view with materials identical to or strongly similar to
building materials. or by landscaping that will be effective in winter. or they shall be
located so as not to be visible from any public right of way. private street or off street
parking area. In no case shall wooden fencing be used as a rooftop equipment screen.
(1) Signs
1. Not withstanding contrary provisions in the city code the following provisions are
allowed in the DC district
Proiecting signs perpendicular to the building. Proiecting signs shall comply with
subsection 1 0-6-3 (B)5(e) of this chapter (Spruce Street signs).
2. Wall signs flat along building frontage as required in Section 10-6-3(B)3(a).
3. Monument signs are allowed where existing building is set back from front
property line as required in Section 1 0-6-3(B)3(b ).
4. Painted Wall Signs shall be permitted through a conditional use permit per Section
10-6-3 (B)I(1).
5. A-Frame signs are allowed per Section 1O-6-3(B)I(t).
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED this _day of
Farmington.
, 2009, by the City Council of the City of
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator
5
SEAL
By:
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of
,2009.
6
~.G
Section 10-6-3 (B)5(e) Projecting Signs:
(1) Type Of Signage: No advertising signage is allowed; only business identification signs are
permitted.
(2) Projecting: The sign shall be perpendicular to the surface of the building and the sign may be no
more than one foot (1 ') thick.
(3) Size: Projecting signs may project no more than four feet (4') from the front edge of the
building and be no more than twelve (12) square feet in area.
(4) Height: The bottom of the projecting sign must be at least eight feet (8') above sidewalk grade.
(S) Materials: Projecting signs must be approved by the planning commission during the sign
permit application process.
(6) Illumination: Projecting signs may be lit with external lighting only and shall comply with
section 10-6-8 of this chapter.
(7) Public Right Of Way: Projecting signs may not extend over a public right of way or public
property (except a sidewalk or trail portion thereof) except by conditional use permit.
(8) Parking Space Or Loading Dock: Projecting signs may not extend over a designated parking
space or loading area.
(9) Box Signs: Projecting box signs or cabinet signs are prohibited. (Ord. 004-508, 3-1-2004)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.463.7111 . Fax 651.463.2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lee Smick, City Planner #/
AICP, CNU-Accredited ;p--
SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Section 10-6-20 of the City Code concerning Industrial Park
Design Standards
DATE: October 13,2009
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Staff is proposing the attached ordinance defining the requirements for the Industrial Park (IP)
District's design standards. The standards were reviewed by the EDA on September 28, 2009.
Minor changes to the ordinance are highlighted in yellow after comments were received from the
EDA (Exhibit A). The EDA members felt comfortable with the allowance of metal on the upper
portion of a building in the IP zone. They also were in favor of allowing outdoor storage without
the need to screen within areas of the park that are not visible from CSAH SO or 31.
As discussed in previous meetings, staff is proposing revisions to the exterior surface of a
building in the IP zone. Currently the code reads that pre-engineered metal shall not exceed 6%
of an exterior surface. The proposed revision allows for pre-engineered metal not exceed SO%
on the exterior surface of a building and the metal may only be applied to the upper half portion
of the building. If this change is approved, it would also be in effect for the existing Industrial
Park.
Additionally, the outdoor storage section of the existing code has been revised to read as follows:
(F) Screening:
I.Storage Areas: Outdoor storage within the IP district shall be an allowed accessory use
under the following conditions:
a. Outside storage areas shall not be viewed from CSAH 50 or CSAH 31, nor shall any
articles, goods, materials, incinerators, storage tanks, refuse containers or like
equipment be kept in the open or exposed to CSAH SO or CSAH 31.
b. Required screening shall include:
(1) a six (6) to eight foot (8') tall opaque maintenance free fence and landscaping. The
grade for determining height shall be the grade elevation of the building or use for
which the screening is providing protection. The design and materials used in
constructing a required landscape screen with fence shall be subject to the approval of
the Planning Division, and shall include the following:
Plant material centers shall not be located within drainage and utility easement
and not closer than five feet (S') from the fence line or property line. Landscape
screen plant material shall be in two (2) or more rows and staggered. Shrubs
shall be arranged to lessen the visual gaps between trees. Deciduous shrubs shall
not be planted more than four feet (4') on center, and/or evergreen shrubs shall
not be planted more than three feet (3') on center. Deciduous trees intended for
screening shall be planted not more than forty feet (40') apart. Evergreen trees
intended for screening shall be planted not more than fifteen feet (IS') apart or;
(2) landscaping and minimum six (6) foot tall berms. Landscaping shall follow the
requirements in 1O-6-20(F)lb(l). The slope ofthe earth berm shall not exceed a three
to one (3:1) slope unless approved by the city engineer. The earth berm shall contain no
less than four inches (4 ") of topsoil. The outdoor storage area shall be grassed or
surfaced to control dust.
c. The outdoor storage area shall not encroach into a required front yard setback or side
yard setback area on a corner lot.
d. Outside storage does not require screening within any interior lot that is not exposed to
CSAH SO or CSAH 31.
ACTION REOUESTED
Recommend approval of the amendments to Section 10-6-20 concerning the Industrial Park
District design standards and forward the recommendation to the City Council.
7il1 Submitte
Lee Smick, City Planner
AICP, CNU-Accredited
~XA
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE FARMINGTON
CITY CODE, THE FARMINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE
CONCERNING INDUSTRIAL PARK DESIGN STANDARDS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 10-6-20 of the Farmington City Code is amended to read as
follows:
10-6-20: Industrial Park Design Standards:
(A) Purpose: The Industrial Park Design Standards establish design criteria and
minimum standards for industrial development within the City of Farmington. The
purpose of the design standards is to:
1. Enhance and protect Farmington's quality oflife and community image through
clearly articulated industrial development design standards.
2. Protect and promote Farmington's long term economic vitality through industrial
design standards which encourage high quality development. while discouraging
less attractive and less enduring alternatives.
3. Minimize adverse impacts of vehicular circulation to existing neighborhoods and
to the surrounding physical environment.
4. Enhance and protect the security and health. safety and welfare of all residents of
the City of Farmington.
5. Facilitate an understanding of Farmington's expectations and to assist developers
in compiling a complete and efficient application.
(B) Process:
Farmington's Industrial Park Design Standards will be administered through the Site
Plan Process in Section 10-6-23.
1
(C) Applicability:
1. All new construction and renovations or additions of existing industrial structures
within the Industrial Park District (IP) will be required to meet the standards in this
chapter. Proiects exempt from meeting the standards are those industrial buildings
that fall outside the Industrial Park District. or are comprised of any of the following
proj ect types:
(a) Interior remodels;
(b) Buildings being entirely used as residential;
(c) Normal or routine maintenance and repair of existing structures;
(d) Any type of construction that does not require a building permit.
(D) Building Material And Design:
1. Exterior Walls: Exterior walls of buildings to be constructed shall consist of one or
more of the following materials and shall receive prior approval of the city:
(a) Brick: Size, type, texture, color and placement shall be approved.
(b) Stone: Stone shall have a weathered face or shall be polished, fluted or broken
face.
( c) Concrete Masonry Block: Concrete masonry block shall be those generally
described as "customized architectural concrete masonry units" or shall be
broken faced brick type units with marble aggregate. All concrete masonry
units shall be coated or veneered witft-a: and city approved by the city.
eaating. There shall be no exposed concrete block on the exterior of any
building unless approved by the city.
(d) Concrete: Concrete may be poured in place, tilt up or precast; and shall be
finished in stone, brick, textured or coated, with a minimum life expectancy of
ten (10) years.
2. Alternate Materials: Alternate exterior surface materials of pre-engineered metal
may be substituted in an amount not to exceed sHt fifty percent (6 SO%) of the
exterior wall surface area of each building and the pre-engineered metal shall only be
installed on the upper half portion of the building. if the following conditions apply
Other conditions are as follows:
(a) Used for housing or screening equipment necessary to the manufacturing
operations;
(b) Architecturally compatible with the building as a whole as determined by the
city planning division;
2
(c) Compliance with any additional screening and/or landscaping requirements of
the city; and
(d) Modifications are made with prior written approval of the city planning
division.
3. Alterations To Buildings: Any alterations to buildings shall meet all requirements
of this chapter.
4. Canopies: Canopies with visible wall hangers shall not be permitted. Design of
canopies shall be in keeping with the design of the building and shall be approved by
the city prior to construction or alteration.
5. Roof Mounted Equipment: All rooftop equipment shall be set back a minimum of
twenty feet (20') from the edge of the roof and shall be screened. Screening shall
consist of either a parapet wall along the roof edge or an opaque screen constructed of
the same material as the building's primary vertical exposed exterior finish.
Equipment shall be painted a neutral color. The site plan shall indicate all mechanical
rooftop equipment and shall include elevations.
6. Loading Docks: The design of the loading docks shall be incorporated into the
overall design theme of the building and constructed of materials equal to or the same
as the principal building. The loading dock areas shall be landscaped and/or screened
so that the visual and acoustic impacts of their function is fully contained and out of
view of adjacent properties and public streets. The required width for a landscaped
yard along a local collector/industrial or local street is ten feet (10'). The architectural
design shall be continuous and uninterrupted by ladders, towers, fences, and
equipment. Businesses that abut County Highway 50 and/or County Highway 31 shall
not construct loading docks that front these roadways.
7. Trash Containers: Trash containers or trash compactors shall not be located within
twenty feet (20') of any street, sidewalk or internal pedestrianway and shall be
screened by a six foot (6') masonry wall on three (3) sides of the trash unit.
8. Coverage: Unless otherwise approved by the city, the ratio of building square
footage and parking area shall not exceed sixty five percent (65%) of the total square
footage of any building site within the affected property.
(E) Utilities: All buildings and structures shall be served by underground utility
distribution facilities. The installation of such utilities shall not change the grade or
contour of the city approved grading plan for the site.
(F) Building Setbacks: No building or other structure shall be erected within fifty feet
(50') of the front property line; or twenty five feet (25') of the side and rear property
lines. If two (2) or more lots are developed as one site, the interior common lot line
shall be ignored.
3
(G) Parking Areas:
1. Surfacing: Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all parking areas,
driveways and loading areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete pavement
following the city's engineering standard plates. In the event said surfacing cannot be
completed due to weather or seasonal restrictions, a temporary certificate of
occupancy may be issued contingent upon the extension of the security or letter of
credit required under this chapter. All parking lots located in the front of buildings or
adjacent to street rights of way shall be curbed.
2. Off Street Parking Spaces Required: Off street parking shall be provided to serve
each site. The minimum number of parking spaces shall be the greater of:
(a) One space for every six hundred (600) square feet of industrial space; and
One space for every two hundred (200) square feet of office space; and
One space for each two thousand (2,000) square feet of storage area
or
(b) One space per projected employee per shift.
3. Screening: All parking areas shall be screened as required in subsection (F) of this
section.
4. Location: Parking shall not be permitted within ten feet (10') of the front property
line (those facing any dedicated street), or within ten feet (10') of any side or rear
property line unless otherwise approved by the city. (Ord. 002-469, 2-19-2002; amd.
Ord. 002-477, 7-15-2002)
(E) Landscaping: All open spaces shall be dustproofed, surfaced, landscaped, rockscaped
or devoted to lawns. Not less than two-thirds eh) of the required building setback
area from any dedicated street shall be landscaped with lawns, trees, shrubs and
walkways of a design approved by the city planning dh-ision. Landscaping shall be
installed within ninety (90) days of occupancy or substantial completion of building,
whichever occurs first, weather permitting.
The following landscape standards shall apply to all proposed projects within the
overlay zones:
1. Lot Frontage Trees: Lot frontage trees shall be planted at one canopy tree per forty
feet (40') of street frontage.
4
2. Perimeter Parking Lots: One tree and three (3) shrubs per forty feet (40') of parking
lot perimeter frontage. Plants are to be installed within ten feet (10') ofthe parking lot
frontage area.
3. Interior Parking Lots: One planting island per twenty (20) parking spaces. One tree
and three (3) shrubs are required within each planting island. The planting island shall
be curbed with concrete.
4. Buffer Area: When the industrial district is adjacent to a residential district, a
twenty five foot (25') buffer is required and shall include a six foot (6') high wooden
fence and landscaping to screen the adjacent property. (Ord. 008-590, 10-20-2008)
(F) Screening:
I.Storage Areas: Outdoor storage within the IP district shall be an allowed accessory
use under the following conditions:
a. V/ithout prior approval of the city, 00 eOutside storage areas shall not be
viewed from CSAH 50 or CSAH 31. allo'..,ed nor shall any articles, goods,
materials, incinerators, storage tanks, refuse containers or like equipment be
kept in the open or exposed to public view CSAH 50 or CSAH 31 or vie':.' from
adjacent buildings. If outside storage is giyen city appro'y'al, 1:1:11 materials andl-or
containers and equipment shall be screened from yiew.
b. Required screening shall include:
(1) a six (6) to eight foot (8') ffigh tall opaque wooden maintenance free fence
and landscaping. The grade for determining height shall be the grade elevation
of the building or use for which the screening is providing protection. The
design and materials used in constructing a required landscape screen with fence
shall be subiect to the approval of the Planning Division. and shall include the
following:
Plant material centers shall not be located within drainage and utility
easement and not closer than five feet (5') from the fence line or
property line. Landscape screen plant material shall be in two (2) or
more rows and staggered. Shrubs shall be arranged to lessen the visual
gaps between trees. Deciduous shrubs shall not be planted more than
four feet (4') on center. and/or evergreen shrubs shall not be planted
more than three feet (3') on center. Deciduous trees intended for
screening shall be planted not more than forty feet (40') apart. Evergreen
trees intended for screening shall be planted not more than fifteen feet
(15') apart or;
(2) landscaping and minimum six (6) foot tall berms. Landscaping shall follow
the requirements in 10-6-20(F)lb(l). The slope of the earth berm shall not
exceed a three to one (3:1) slope unless approved by the city engineer. The earth
5
berm shall contain no less than four inches (4") of topsoil. or a combination of
both to fully screcn the outdoor storage.
c. The outdoor storage area shall be grassed or surfaced to control dust.
d. The outdoor storage area shall not encroach into a required front yard setback or
on a corner lot within the side yard setback area.
e. Outside storage does not require screening within any interior lot that is not
exposed to CSAH 50 or CSAH 31.
2. Structure: No accessory structures (including, but not limited to, water towers,
storage tanks, processing equipment, cooling towers) or outside equipment shall be
constructed, erected or placed on the affected property without prior approval of the
city. If such approval is granted, such structures shall be screeood from public T/ie\v
and the view of adjaccnt buildings in a manner approved by the city planning
division.
(G) Signs: All signs shall be of a design and material approved by the city planning
division. Unless otherwise approved, wall signs must be attached to the building, and
be parallel to and contiguous with its walls and not projecting above its roofline. No
sign of a flashing or moving character shall be installed and no sign shall be painted
on any building wall. Pole signs will not be allowed. Advertising billboards are not
allowed within the overlay zone. (General guidelines standards for signage available
through the city planner).
(H) Maintenance:
1. Ovmers and occupants of any or all of a site have the duty and responsibility, at
their solc cost and expense, to keep the site, including buildings, improvcments and
grooods, well maintained, saf-e, clean and aesthetically pleasing. Such maintenance
includes, but is not limited to, the follO'.ving:
(a) Prompt removal of all litter, trash, refuse and wastes.
(b) Provide such Cfli'e as required to maintain all vegetation in a healthy and
aesthetically pleasing appefli'ance.
(c) Maintain exterior lighting and mechanical facilities in good 'Norking order.
(d) Maintain pfli'ldng areas, driveways and roads in good repair.
(c) Prompt repair of any exterior damage to any buildings and improvements.
(H) Lighting: All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be
visible from the public right of way or from neighboring residences and shall be in
compliance with section 10-6-8 of this title.
6
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED this _day of
Farmington.
, 2009, by the City Council of the City of
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator
SEAL
By:
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of
,2009.
7
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 . Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Lee Smick, City Planner hUt-
AICP, CNU-Accredited j/t
SUBJECT:
Repeal Section 10-5-9 concerning the R-4 (Medium-High Density
Residential) Zoning District
DATE:
October 13,2009
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
This item was continued from the September 9, 2009 Planning Commission meeting.
The City Code currently includes the R-4 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning District. During the
2030 Comprehensive Plan process, staff determined that the Medium-High Density Residential be eliminated
from the plan because the properties that were identified as Medium-High Density Residential were minimal
and staff wanted a more definitive line between medium and high densities in residential areas (Exhibit A).
The current zoning district density ranges are shown below:
R-l (Low-Density)
1.0 to 3.5 units per acre
R-2 (Low/Medium-Density)
2.5 to 5.5 units per acre
R-3 (Medium-Density)
5.5 to 8.5 units per acre
R-4 (Medium-High Density)
8.5 to 14.0 units per acre
14.0 + units er acre
Staff is proposing the following zoning district densities that correspond to the approved 2030
Comprehensive Plan land use densities:
R-l (Low-Density)
1.0 to 3.5 units per acre
R-2 (Low/Medium-Density)
3.5 to 6.0 units per acre
R-3 (Medium-Density)
6.0 to 12.0 units per acre
12.0 + units er acre
ACTION REOUESTED
Repeal Section 10-5-9 of the zoning code concerning the R-4 (Medium-High Density Residential) Zoning
District and forward the recommendation to the City Council.
Respectfully Submitted,
~!
t;{
Lee Smick, City Planner
AICP, CNU-Accredited
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING THE R-4 (MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT IN SECTION 10-5-9
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 10-5-9 of the Farmington City Code is amended as follows (deleted
text is stmek):
10 5 9: R 4 MEDIUMlHICH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
(.\) Purpose: The R 4 mediumlhigh density residential district designates areas of the city
for de'/elopment of multiple family dwellings in areas with access to jobs, services,
public facilities and transit and that are served with full public utilities and a
r'Csidential density of more than 8.5 units per acre.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum Standards:
Lot area
Tovrohouse 115,000 square feet
Multi family :10,000 square feet
Other : 11 ,000 square feet
Lot width
Tovrohouse :100 feet
Multi family :100 feet
Front yard setback :25 feet
Side yard setback :10 feet
Rear yard setback 110 feet
Height (maximum) 1-
Tovmhouse :35 feet
Multi family :45 feet
Maximum lot coverage of all structures
~~
'Multi family
[Net ~llin~ aaits per acre (""",imam)
i~~~=
30 percent
~
I
.^..11 standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
2. .\.ccessory Structure Standards: .^..ecessory structures must be located behind principal
structure in the side or rear yard according to the follo-.ving requirements:
Maximum size
Detached garages Lesser of 1,000 square feet or square feet of principal use
-
Storage 120 square feet
.^..partment 1,800 square feet
,
Maximum number 1 of each
Side yard setback 6 feet
Rear yard setbaek 6 feet
Height (maximum) shed 12 feet
Hcight (maximum) gf:U"age 20 feet
-
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
3. Minor .f..rterial Setbacks: The minimum front yard setback for all land adjacent to minor
arterial streets shall be fifty feet (50') from the planned right of-.vay line.
(C) Uses:
1. Permitted:
Daycare facilities, in home.
Dv.'Cllings, multi family.
Dwellings, tovmhouse.
Group dayef:U"e, 12 or less persons.
Group home, 6 or less persons.
Public parks and playgrounds.
2. Conditional:
l..ccessory apartment.
Churches.
Clinics.
Clubs.
Funeral homes.
Group daycare, 13 to 16 persons.
Group home, 7 to 16 persons.
Group homes, commercial.
Hospitals.
Nursing homes.
Public and parochial schools.
Public buildings.
Public utility buildings.
3. L^"cccssory:
Accessory struCtUfCS.
Home occupations.
Solar energy systems. COrd. 002 469,2 19 2002)
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED this _day of
Farmington.
, 2009, by the City Council of the City of
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator
SEAL
By:
City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of
,2009.
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800. Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Tony Wippler, Assistant City Planner 7~
SUBJECT:
Add Section 1O-S-20 concerning the Mixed Use Commercial/Residential Zoning District
(MUCR) - Continued
DATE:
October 13, 2009
INTRODUCTION
This item was continued to the October regular meeting as a number of impending zoning map changes, of which this
proposed zone is included, were tabled at last months meeting.
DISCUSSION / REVIEW
The City is in the process of amending the Official Zoning Map to be in compliance with the approved 2030
Comprehensive Plan. The amendment will include zoning the property commonly known as "Fairhill" to a PUD status.
With any property zoned PUD there needs to be an underlying zoning designation whether it be R-l (Low Density
Residential), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) or any other district outlined in the zoning code. Fairhill is unique in that
it possesses 29 acres of land at the intersection of TH 3 and 19Sth Street that is comprehensively guided Mixed Use
(Commercial/Residential). The existing zoning code does not have a current district that staff feels fully meets the
Developer's intent of this land use area.
Attached, for Planning Commission consideration, is the proposed zoning code Section 10-S-20 Mixed Use Commercial /
Residential District. The bulk requirements in the proposed section adhere to what was approved with the PUD
Agreement that was executed in 2008. The developer has been involved in the creation of this particular zoning code.
RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of the attached ordinance creating Section 10-S-20 concerning the Mixed Use Commercial /
Residential Zoning District (MUCR) and forward that recommendation on to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
~P~~ityPlanner
Cc: Peter Gualtieri, Bridgeland Consulting
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING THE MIXED USE COMMERCIAL/
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE ZONING CODE AS
SECTION 10-5-20
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following language be added to the Farmington Zoning Code as Title 10, Chapter 5, Section 20:
10-5-20: MIXED USE COMMERCIAL / RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (MUCR):
(A) Purpose: The Mixed Use Commercial/Residential District is established to provide a flexible framework
for the creation of high quality, comprehensively designed commercial neighborhood development with a
multiple-family component. A variety of developments are encouraged, with developments designed to
promote walking, bicycling and potential transit use.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum Standards:
Lot area:
5,000 square feet
Lot width:
50 feet
Front yard setback:
o feet
Side yard setback:
o feet
Rear yard setback:
o feet
Structure setback from T.H. 3 right-of-way: 30 feet
Structure setback from C.R. 64 right -of-way:
30 feet
Height (maximum):
45 feet
Maximum lot coverage of all structures:
100%
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
(C) Uses:
I. Permitted:
Coffee shops
Neighborhood services.
Nonprofit recreational, cultural and entertainment uses.
Offices.
Personal and professional services, less than 3,000 square feet.
Personal health and beauty services, less than 3,000 square feet.
Restaurants, class I, traditional
Restaurants, class III, with liquor service.
Restaurants, class IV, nonintoxicating.
Retail Sales and Services, less than 3,000 square feet.
2. Conditional:
Animal clinics.
Child day care facilities, commercial.
Churches.
Clinics.
Convenience store, with gas
Dwellings, multi-family.
Funeral homes.
Health clubs.
Hotels
Mixed use building.
Personal and professional services, greater than 3,000 square feet.
Personal health and beauty services, greater than 3,000 square feet.
Public utility buildings.
Retail sales and service, greater than 3,000 square feet.
Restaurants, class II, fast food, convenience.
3. Accessory:
Parking lots.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to
law.
ADOPTED this _ day of
,2009, by the City Council of the City of Farmington.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
BY:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Adminsitrator
SEAL
BY:
City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the
day of
,2009.
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 . Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Lee Smick, City Planner -1-',1/,
AICP, CNU-Accredited If-)
SUBJECT:
Amendment to Section 10-5-1 concerning the Official Zoning Map
DATE:
October 13, 2009
INTRODUCTION
City staff is recommending amendments to Section 10-5-1 concerning the Official Zoning Map (Exhibit A)
in order to comply with the recently approved 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit B). On February 17,2009,
the Metropolitan Council approved Farmington's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. With the approval, the
Metropolitan Council has required that any updated ordinances and controls intended to help implement the
Comprehensive Plan Update be submitted to the Metropolitan Council within nine (9) months of the
Metropolitan Council's approval (December 11, 2009) of the comprehensive plan. The information below
identifies nine (9) areas (Exhibit C) in the City that are in need of Official Zoning Map amendments in order
to comply with the comprehensive plan. The current zoning and proposed zoning, along with reasons for the
zoning change are included in the information below.
DISCUSSION
Staff has identified nine (9) areas of the City that are being proposed to be amended, with the 9th area located
at 10th and Ash Street added as an attached agenda item.
(This property has already been designated correctly.)
Area #1:
3245 Vermillion River Trail
Affected Property Owner:
David King
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Low Density Residential
Current Zoning:
R-l (Low Density Residential)
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
R-l (Low Density Residential)
Reason for proposed change:
Area #2:
Affected Property Owners:
2020 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
Area #3:
Affected Property Owners:
The property was annexed into the City from Empire Township on
November 16, 2006 and an existing single-family house is located
there. Any property annexed into the city receives an A-I zoning
classification until a proper zone is determined and approved. The R-l
zoning district allows for single-family homes.
Apartment Complex - 900 8th Street
Nancy Lee Saunders
Farmington, MN
High Density Residential
R-4 (Medium-High Density Residential)
R-5 (High Density Residential)
The Medium-High Density Residential category has been eliminated
from the Land Use Plan, and therefore, the R-4 zoning category is
proposed to be deleted from the Zoning Map. The property is currently
at a density of25 du/ac and meets the R-5 High Density Residential
density criteria at (12+ du/ac).
Townhouses - 9th Street
Steven Wiese
Tedd Johnson
Dona Lexvold
David George, Jr
Towns Edge Townhouses Assoc
Phylis Kirchner
Cherie Dupuis
Pamela Sorensen
Delynn Pfannenstein
Patricia Kappel
Deanna Johnson
Mary Czech
Gwendolyn Erdmann
Brenda Kooiman
Dwight & Mary Jo Tange
David Murphy
Mortgage Electronic Reg System
C/O Nationstar Mortgage Lie
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
Area #4:
Affected Property Owner:
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
Area #5:
Affected Property Owners:
High Density Residential
R-4 (Medium-High Density Residential)
R-5 (High Density Residential)
The Medium-High Density Residential category has been eliminated
from the Land Use Plan, and therefore, the R -4 zoning category is
proposed to be deleted from the Zoning Map. The property is currently
at a density of 16 du/ac and meets the R-5 High Density Residential
density criteria at (12+ du/ac).
Twin Ponds Townhomes & 6 Single-Family Lots
Dakota County Community Development Agency
Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential
R-4 (Medium-High Density Residential) - Townhomes
R-3 (Medium Density Residential) - Townshomes
R-l (Low Density Residential) - Single-Family Lots
The Medium-High Density Residential category has been eliminated
from the Land Use Plan, and therefore, the R-4 zoning category is
proposed to be deleted from the Zoning Map. The property is currently
at a density of9.2 du/ac and meets the R-3 Medium Density Residential
density criteria at (6.0-12.0 du/ac). The 2030 Comprehensive Plan
shows the property Medium Density and Low Density Residential and
therefore, the proposed zones ofR-3 and R-l (6 single-family lots)
comply with the plan.
15 Properties on Ash Street/Highland Circle
Harriet Grove
Donald & Teresa Wilson
David & Kathleen Peterson
Leslie & Kristine Nelson
Jessica Walker
Gerald Graham
Bruce Durham
John Klaus
Ronald & Beverly Ersfeld
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
Area #6:
Affected Property Owner:
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
Area #7:
Affected Property Owners:
Eric & Julie Simonsen
William Cook
Holly Ann Toutges
James & Theresa Czech
Lucille Korsman
Virginia Carey
Vernon Johnson
Lucilla Johnson
Louis & Jean Schmitz
Beverly Morell
Michael Hunter
Michael & Helen Penney
Low-Medium Density Residential
A-I (Agricultural)
R-2 (Low-Medium Density Residential)
The properties were annexed into the City from Castle Rock Township
on September 15, 2005 and existing single-family homes are located
there. Any property annexed into the city receives an A-I zoning
classification until a proper zone is determined and approved. The R-2
zoning district allows for single-family homes.
24-Unit Apartment Complex - 4345 220th Street
Westview Associates
High Density Residential
R-4 (Medium-High Density Residential)
R-5 (High Density Residential)
The Medium-High Density Residential category has been eliminated
from the Land Use Plan, and therefore, the R -4 zoning category is
proposed to be deleted from the Zoning Map. The property is currently
at a density of 19 dulac and meets the R-5 High Density Residential
density criteria at (12+ dulac).
Properties west of CSAH 31 and north of CSAH 50
Bernard Murphy
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
Area #8:
Affected Property Owner:
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
John Devney
Lew Wurdemann
Huber Family
Industrial, Commercial
Industrial
IP (Industrial Park)
B-1 (Highway Business)
The properties were shown on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as
Industrial and Commercial and therefore, they are proposed to be
rezoned to IP (Industrial Park) and B-1 (Highway Business) to be
compatible with the approved plan.
Fairhill Development
Jim Seed
Low Density Residential, Low-Medium Density Residential, Medium
Density Residential, Mixed Use CommerciallResidential, Park/Open
Space, Public/Semi-Public, Open Space/ROW/Floodplain. The Fairhill
land use plan was approved on April 21, 2008 by the Farmington City
Council.
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
A revised land use plan was approved on April 21, 2008 and is shown
on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit B). The zoning of the
property is proposed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD).
The current 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Exhibit D) shows the Fairhillland uses that were originally approved
on June 16, 2006. As stated above, the revised land use plan for Fairhill was approved on April 21, 2008.
On that date, the 2006 Fairhillland uses (Exhibit D) shown on the current 2030 Comprehensive Plan were in
the midst of being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and adjacent jurisdictions. It was determined by
staff to wait until the time when the Official Zoning Map was being proposed for amendments that the 2008
Fairhillland uses would be included on the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as shown on Exhibit B. Therefore,
the revised 2008 land uses are in effect.
Area #9:
10th and Ash Street (attached agenda item)
ACTION REQUESTED
City staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the amendments to the zoning map as
described above and forward the recommendation to the City Council.
Respectfully Submitted,
'C"? f2
I~(~I
~thick, City Planner
AICP, CNU-Accredited
~.A
Proposed Zoning Districts
City of Farmington
~........,...
I ''-~._--"
"'"-
~~l
I
o
I
0.25 0.5
I
1 Miles
t
Legend
Zoning Cl P/OS (Park/Open Space)
D A-1 (Agriculture) D R-1 (Low Density Residential- 1.0-3.5 du/ac)
~!,"i~ B-1 (Highway Business) 0 R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential- 3.5 - 6.0 du/ac)
_ B-2 (Downtown Business) c:l R-3 (Medium Density Residential- 6.0-12.0 du/ac)
_ B-3 (Heavy Business) _ R-5 (High Density Residential- 12.0+ du/ac)
_ B-4 (Neighborhood Business) 8m R-D (Downtown Residential)
_ Business/Commercial Flex 0 R- T (Downtown Transitional Mixed Use)
c:J 1-1 (Industrial) D ROW(Right-of-Way)
_ IP (Industrial Park) E:Z:J SSC (Spruce Street Commercial)
_ Mixed-Use D Water
_ Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential
Other
D Vermillion River Floodplain 1::1 Downtown Commercial District
+ Historic Properties
N
W+E
S
Map dated August 21, 2009.
Prepared for the City of Farmington's
Community Development Department
by the Dakota County Office of GIS.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
(2008 Update)
EX. 6
~-..",
r'-~'
Legend
- - - MUSA Line
~ Ag Preserves
D Agricultural
_ Commercial
_ Industrial
_ Mixed-Use (Commercial/Residential)
D Low Density (1.0-3.5 du/ac)
D Low Medium (3.5-6.0 du/ac)
~."~':'I Medium Density (6.0-12.0 du/ac)
_ High Density (12.0+ du/ac)
D Public/Semi-Public
1m Park/Open Space
_ Restricted Development
D ROW (Right-ol-Way)
~ Empire OAA
~ Castle Rock OAA
I
o
I
2,000
Map current as of
August 26, 2009.
Prepared lor the Farmington Community Development Department by the Dakota County Office 01 GIS.
>
~
Property Locations for Proposed Zoning Map Amendments
ek.c
190THSTW
'-1
Area #8
)
./
\\ I ./
::;::=1
II
I
/
~ll
200TH Sf W
I [ .~
/" -,-- J I I
"T"-
W Area #7 r
I 'W
~ I ~
__l~ ..". z
-] 0 I
> ~~
~ < -1 >
i z g <
w .
r w
~ 3
LAKEVlLLE BLVD .
L ~ -:r 212TH Sf W-.
.J ~J I ill" I f'J r
l - 1
I
~-~
I I U
_J -- " '.::1
l- Is!
(=
Area #1
J 1 i
..y-
I
o
I
2,000
I
4,000 Feet
N
W+E
S
Prepared for the
Farmington Community Development Department
by the Dakota County Office of GiS.
Legend
2030 Comprehensive Plan
(2008 Update)
Map 4.5
;.,
..~~
--- MUSALine
~ Ag Preserves
D Agricuttural
_ Commercial
_ Industrial
_ Mixed-Use (CommerciallResidenlial)
D Low Density (1.0-3.5 du/ac)
D Low Medium (3.5-6.0 du/ac)
D Medium Density (6.0-12.0 du/ac)
t:~:;~ High Density (12.0+ du/ac)
D Public/Semi-Public
D Park/Open Space
_ Restricted Development
D ROW (Right-ot-Way)
~ Castle Rock OAA
~ Empire OAA
I
o
I
2,000
t
Map current as of
October 14, 200&
Prepared tor the Farmington Community Development Department by the Dakota County Office of GIS.
~""1603
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 . Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lee Smick, City Planner ~
AICP, CNU-Accredited
SUBJECT: Amend the 2030 Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map at 913 10th Street and 1001 Ash Street
DATE: September 9, 2009
INTRODUCTION
City staff determined that there were 2 additional properties that needed to be amended concerning the
Official Zoning Map in order to comply with the recently approved 2030 Comprehensive Plan. However, it
was also determined that the 2030 Comprehensive Plan needed to be amended for the properties. The
properties are located at 913 10th Street and 1001 Ash Street. Both are currently zoned R-3 (Medium
Density Residential) and both are designated as Medium Density Residential on the plan which is the City's
designation for townhome use. Staff proposes to amend the properties by rezoning them to R-2
(Low/Medium Density Residential) and redesignating them to Low/Medium Density Residential on the plan
to make them compatible with adjacent residential land uses to the west and north of these properties.
DISCUSSION
Staff has identified Area #9 on the attached map (Exhibit and proposes the following amendments:
Area #9:
913 10th Street
Affected Property Owner:
Bing & Tammy Threet, Jr.
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Medium Density Residential
Current Zoning:
R-3 (Medium Density Residential)
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential)
Reason for proposed change:
In reviewing property records, it was determined that this property was
inadvertently changed to R-3 in the past, which is the City's zoning
designation for townhomes. Since the property is a single-family
residence, the City proposes to redesignate the property to R-2, which
allows for a single-family home. Additionally, to match the new
zoning, the City proposes to redesignate the comprehensive plan from
Medium Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential.
.............................................
Area #9:
Affected Property Owners:
2030 Comprehensive Plan
Land Use(s):
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning Change(s):
Reason for proposed change:
ACTION REOUESTED
1001 Ash Street
Timothy Nerud
Medium Density Residential
R-3 (Medium Density Residential)
R-2 (LowlMedium Density Residential)
In reviewing property records, it was determined that this property was
inadvertently changed to R-3 in the past, which is the City's zoning
designation for townhomes. Since the property is a single-family
residence, the City proposes to redesignate the property to R-2, which
allows for a single-family home. Additionally, to match the new
zoning, the City proposes to redesignate the comprehensive plan from
Medium Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential.
City staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the amendments to the zoning map and 2030
Comprehensive Plan as described above and forward the recommendation to the City Council.
Respect.~~Ub 'tted, J
~. ~
Lee Smick, City Planner '.
AICP, CNU-Accredited
RESOLUTION NO.
AMENDING THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 913 10TH STREET AND 1001 ASH STREET
FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW/MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 19th day of
October, 2009 at 7:00 P.M.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member _ seconded the following:
WHEREAS, the City of Farmington has initiated a Comprehensive Land Use amendments for
the properties located at 913 10th Street and 1001 Ash Street from Medium Density Residential to
Low/Medium Density Residential, and
WHEREAS; the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 13th day of October, 2009
after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent
to surrounding property owners, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission accepted public comments at the public hearing and
recommended approval of the Comprehensive Land Use amendments for the properties located at
913 10th Street and 100 I Ash Street from Medium Density Residential to Low/Medium Density
Residential
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan for the properties located at 913 10th Street and 1001 Ash Street
from Medium Density Residential to Low/Medium Density Residential from Non-Designated to
Commercial contingent upon the following:
A. Subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
application.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the
19th day of October, 2009.
Todd, Larson Mayor
Attested to the _ day of October, 2009.
Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
An Ordinance Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the Farmington
Zoning Ordinance, rezoning the properties located at 913 10th Street and
1001 Ash Street from R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to R-2
(Low/Medium Density Residential)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HEREBY ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 10-5-1 of the Farmington City Code is amended by
rezoning the properties legally described on the attached Exhibit A from R-3 (Medium
Density Residential) to R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential).
SECTION 2. The Zoning Map of the City of Farmington, adopted under Section
10-5-1 of the Farmington City Code, shall be republished to show the aforesaid zoning.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage.
ADOPTED this _day of
Farmington.
, 2009, by the City Council of the City of
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator
SEAL
By:
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of
,2009.
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.463.7111 . Fax 651.463.2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Lee Smick, City Planner .1J!--
AICP, CNU-Accredited /
SUBJECT: Text amendments to the zoning code for the R-l, R-2, R-3, R-5, R-T, and R-D
zoning districts concerning density.
DATE: October 13,2009
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
Per state statute, Farmington is required to make any updates or amendments to its corresponding
official controls (zoning code, zoning map) within nine months (December 11, 2009) of approval
of Farmington's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update by the Metropolitan Council. The
amendment to the official controls will do the following:
· are consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework,
· conform to the metropolitan system plans, and
· are congruent with all other elements of Farmington's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Any revisions by the City to bring the local controls into alignment with the comprehensive plan,
will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council The City of Farmington will not adopt any new
official controls that conflict with Farmington's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update, and will not
permit activity which conflicts with the metropolitan system Policy Plans.
Zonine Districts
The City is divided into the zoning districts shown on the revised zoning map (Exhibit A). The
residential land use densities described below are the current densities, however, densities in the
low/medium, medium, medium/high, and high residential districts have been revised in the 2030
Comprehensive Plan Update as shown in the table below.
PROPOSED LAND USE DENSITIES IN 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Low-Density
1.0 to 3.5 units per acre (unchanged)
Low/Medium-Density
3.5 to 6.0 units per acre
Medium-Density
6.0 to 12.0 units per acre
12.0 + units er acre
The revisions to each residential zoning district are shown on Exhibit B.
ACTION REQUESTED
Recommend approval of the amendments to the zoning code for the R-l, R-2, R-3, R-5, R-T, and
R-D zoning districts and forward the recommendation to the City Council.
Respectfully Submitted,
(Jt/~
Lee Smick, City Planner
AICP, CNU-Accredited
City of Farmington
E"~A
Proposed Zoning Districts
Legend
Zoning
D A-1 (Agriculture)
rm B-1 (Highway Business)
_ B-2 (Downtown Business)
_ B-3 (Heavy Business)
_ B-4 (Neighborhood Business)
_ Business/Commercial Flex
D 1-1 (Industrial)
_ IP (Industrial Park)
_ Mixed-Use
_ Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential
Other
D Vermillion River Floodplain 1::1 Downtown Commercial District
+ Historic Properties
I "-ill' ..-,-"c
--,./ III ~
.........-...... ..-...
,
J::'-=
-,~
I
o
I
0.25 0.5
_I
I
1 Miles
t~ P/OS (Park/Open Space)
D R-1 (Low Density Residential - 1.0-3.5 du/ac)
D R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential, 3.5 - 6.0 du/ac)
I::J R-3 (Medium Density Residential - 6.0-12.0 du/ac)
_ R-5 (High Density Residential - 12.0+ du/ac)
r::J R-D (Downtown Residential)
D R-T (Downtown Transitional Mixed Use)
D ROW (Right-ot-Way)
M SSC (Spruce Street Commercial)
DWater
N
W+E
S
Map dated August 21, 2009.
Prepared tor the City ot Fannington's
Community Development Department
by the Dakota County Office of GIS.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 10-5-6 (B) 1, 10-5-7 (B) 1,
10-5-8 (A) AND (B) 1, 10-5-10 (A) AND (B) 1, 10-5-11 (B) 1,
10-5-12 (B) 1 CONCERNING DENSITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE
FARMINGTON CITY CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. The City of Farmington City Code, Section 10-5-6 is amended by adding
the underlined language below and deleting the strikethrough language as follows:
10-5-6: R-l LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
(A) Purpose: The R-llow density residential district provides for existing and future low
density single-family development with full public utilities.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum Standards:
ILot area I
I Single- family 10,000 square feet I
I Other 17,000 square feet I
ILot width 75 feet I
IFront yard setback 20 feet I
ISide yard setback 6 feet
IRear yard setback 6 feet
IHeight (maximum) 35 feet
IMaximum lot coverage of all structures I 30 percent
Net dwelling units per acre (maximum min- I 1.0 - 3.5
max.)
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
SECTION 2. The City of Farmington City Code, Section 10-5-7 is amended by adding
the underlined language below and deleting the strikethrough language as follows:
10-5-7: R-2 LOW /MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
(A) Purpose: The R-210w/medium density residential district is intended as an area
which incorporates older existing development as well as undeveloped land suitable for
single- and two-family development that are served with full public utilities.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum Standards:
ILot area I
!Single- family II 6,000 square feet I
ITwin home II 11,000 square feet I
ITwo-family II 11,000 square feet I
I Other II 11,000 square feet I
ILot width
ISingle- family II 60 feet
ITwin home II 37.5 feet
ITwo-family II 75 feet
IFront yard setback II 20 feet
ISide yard setback
I Single- family II 6 feet
ITwin home II 6 feet and 0 feet
ITwo-family II 6 feet
IRear yard setback
ISingle- family I 6 feet
ITwin home 6 feet
ITwo-family 6 feet
I Townhouse 10 feet
IHeight (maximum) I 35 feet I
IMaximum lot coverage of all structures II 30 percent I
INet dwelling units per acre (maximum min - max.) I
I Single-family II ~ 3.5 - 6.0 I
ITwin home II ~ 3.5 - 6.0 I
I Two-family II ~ 3.5 - 6.0 I
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
SECTION 3. The City of Farmington City Code, Section 10-5-8 is amended by adding
the underlined language below and deleting the strikethrough language as follows:
10-5-8: R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
(A) Purpose: The R-3 medium density residential district designates areas of the city for
development of townhomes in areas with access to jobs, services, public facilities and
transit and that are served with full public utilities and a residential density of more than
*' between 6.0 and 12.0 units per acre.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum Standards:
ILot area I
I Townhouse II 15,000 square feet I
I Other II 17,000 square feet I
!Lot width I
ITownhouse II 100 feet I
IFront yard setback II 25 feet I
ISide yard setback II 10 feet I
IRear yard setback II 10 feet I
IHeight (maximum) I
ITwo-family and townhouse II 45 feet I
IMaximum lot coverage of all structures II 30 percent I
INet dwelling units per acre (maximum min - max.) II ~ 6.0 -12.0 I
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
SECTION 4. The City of Farmington City Code, Section 10-5-10 is amended by adding
the underlined language below and deleting the strikethrough language as follows:
10-5-10: R-5 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
(A) Purpose: The R-5 high density residential district designates areas of the city for
development of multiple-family dwellings (apartments. condos. etc.) in areas with
access to jobs, services, public facilities and transit and that are served with full
public utilities and a residential density of more than fourteen (11) 12.0 units per acre.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum Standards:
ILot area 1140,000 square feetl
ILot width II 100 feet I
IFront yard setback II 25 feet I
ISide yard setback II 10 feet I
IRear yard setback II 10 feet I
IHeight (maximum) II 45 feet I
IMaximum lot coverage of all structures II 30 percent I
INet dwelling units per acre (min - max.)11 -l4 12.0+ I
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
SECTION 5. The City of Farmington City Code, Section 10-5-11 is amended by adding
the underlined language below and deleting the strikethrough language as follows:
10-5-11: R- T DOWNTOWN TRANSITIONAL MIXED USE DISTRICT:
(A) Purpose: The R- T downtown transitional mixed use district allows for a variety of
compatible uses to create a transition between the downtown business district and
existing downtown residential areas and to promote neighborhoods that are pedestrian
friendly.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum Standards:
ILot area I
ISingle-family 116,000 square feet I
ITwin home 1111,000 square feetl
ITwo-family 1111,000 square feetl
ITownhouse 1115,000 square feetl
IMulti - family 1110,000 square feetl
I Other 1111,000 square feetl
ILot width I
I Single-family II 60 feet I
ITwin home II 37.5 feet I
ITwo- family II 75 feet I
IT ownhouse II 100 feet I
IMulti-family II 60 feet I
!Front yard setback II 20 feet I
jSide yard setback II 6 feet I
IRear yard setback II 6 feet I
IHeight (maximum) II 35 feet I
IMaximum lot coverage of all structures II 35 percent I
INet dwelling units per acre I
ITwin home II 7.0 1
ITwo-family II 6.0 I
ITownhouse II 8.5 I
!Multi-family II -l-4 12.0+ I
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
SECTION 6. The City of Farmington City Code, Section 10-5-12 is amended by adding
the underlined language below and deleting the strikethrough language as follows:
10-5-12: R-D DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
(A) Purpose: The R-D downtown residential district recognizes the development patterns
of the original residential areas of Farmington adjacent to the downtown. The purpose
of the R-D district is to accommodate existing higher density two-family and multi-
family residential development and promote infill of single-family, two-family and
multi-family residential development within the downtown area in order to strengthen
the downtown, create pedestrian friendly neighborhoods, and decrease the need for
automobile use through mixed uses.
(B) Bulk And Density Standards:
1. Minimum. Standards:
ILot area: I
IMinimum 116,000 square feet I
IMaximum 1114,400 square feetl
I Single- family 116,000 square feet I
!Two-family 1111,000 square feetl
I Other 1111,000 square feetl
ILot width: I
ISingle- family II 60 feet I
ITwo-family II 75 feet I
IOther II 75 feet
IFront yard setback II 20 feet
ISide yard setback II 5 feet
IRear yard setback II 6 feet
IHeight (maximum) II 35 feet
IMaximum lot coverage of all structures 11 35 percent
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
!Net dwelling units per acre: I
ITwin home II 7.0 units I
ITwo-family II 6.0 units I
I Townhouse II 8.5 units I
IMulti-family 11M 12.0+ units I
All standards are minimum requirements unless noted.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED this _day of
Farmington.
, 2009, by the City Council of the City of
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Peter Herlofsky, Jr., City Administrator
SEAL
By:
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of
,2009
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, Minnesota
651.280.6800 . Fax 651.280.6899
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Lee Smick, City Planner,%-
AICP, CNU-Accredited
SUBJECT:
Amend Section 10-5-5 (C) 2 concerning the Commercial Recreational Uses
DATE:
October 13,2009
INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION
The City Code currently allows commercial and recreational uses as a conditional use in the A-I
(Agricultural) zoning district. This should read commercial recreational uses, eliminating the "and" in the
use (Exhibit A). Commercial recreational uses is defined as "the provision of entertainment, games of skill
or lessons to the general public for a fee, including, but not limited to, dance and karate studios, golf driving
range, archery, and miniature golf."
ACTION REOUESTED
Amend Section 10-5-5 (C) 2 of the zoning code concerning commercial recreational uses in the A-I zoning
district and forward the recommendation to the City Council.
Respectfully Submitted,
L... ..' (r7
~~
Lee Smick, City Planner
AICP, CNU-Accredited
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10-5-5 (C) 2 OF THE
ZONING CODE CONCERNING COMMERCIAL
RECREATIONAL USES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Section 10-5-5 (C) of the Farmington City Code is amended to read as
follows:
2. Conditional:
Accessory apartment.
Agricultural services.
Cemeteries.
Churches.
Commercial tmd recreational uses.
Equipment maintenance and storage facilities.
Feedlots.
Golf courses.
Kennels.
Mineral extraction.
Public and parochial schools.
Public buildings and facilities.
Public utility buildings.
Stables and riding academies.
1
Towers.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED this _day of
Farmington.
, 2009, by the City Council of the City of
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Todd Larson, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Peter Herlofsky, City Administrator
SEAL
By:
City Attorney
Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of
,2009.
2
2010CENSUS: IT'S IN OUR HANDS
Complete Count
Committees
Press Kit
USCENSUSBUREAU
census'
2010
Complete Count Committees
Press Kit Contents
Executive Summary
1
Complete Count Committee Press Release
2
About Complete Count Committees
Complete Count Committee Facts
4
6
Potential Stories
Multimedia Resources
7
Contacts
8
USCENSUSBUREAU
census'
2010
ii
Executive Summary
2010 Census Complete Count Committees
The U.S. Census Bureau cannot conduct the 2010 Census alone. Complete Count Committees
(CCCs) are volunteer committees established by state, local and tribal governments, and/or
community leaders to increase awareness of the 2010 Census and motivate residents in their
communities to respond. They often include a cross section of community representatives -
including government agencies, education, business, faith-based organizations and the media -
and aim to address the various racial, ethnic, cultural and geographic considerations of their
communities.
The following media materials provide useful information, story ideas and multimedia resources
pertaining to CCCs and the important role they play in raising awareness of the 2010 Census,
including:
. Reaching Hard-to-Count Populations - CCCs design and implement plans to inspire hard-
to-count groups in their communities to participate.
. A History of Making a Difference - Since the 1980 Census, CCCs have played a major role
in raising awareness of the census among all groups and populations.
. Speaking the Language of the Community - CCCs have their fingers on the pulse of their
communities, so they are best suited to develop census awareness campaigns that address the
special characteristics of their communities.
USCENS
SBUREAU
census'
2010
u.s. Census Bureau News
u.s. Department of Commerce . Washington, D.C. 20233
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FRIDAY, JULY 24, 2009
Public Information Office
301-763-3691
e-mail: <pio@census.gov>
CB09-CN.13
Complete Count Committees are Forming Nationwide
for the 2010 Census
Local volunteer committees driving participation in their communities
Complete Count Committees (CCC) are forming across the country to spread the word about
the importance of the 2010 Census and to motivate every resident in their community to
complete and return their 2010 Census questionnaire.
Made up of state, local and tribal governments, and/or community leaders, CCCs are one of
the core strategic elements of the 2010 Census. Committees often include a cross section of
community representatives - including government agencies, education, business, faith-based
organizations and the media - and aim to address the various racial, ethnic, cultural and
geographic considerations of their communities.
Using local knowledge, expertise and influence, CCCs plan and implement census awareness
campaigns that address the special characteristics of their communities. Local campaigns are
designed to reach traditionally undercounted populations by stressing the importance of an
accurate census count, including how data are collected and used.
Since the 1980 Census, CCCs have played a major role in raising awareness of the census
among all groups and populations through various activities. Prom now until May 2010, CCCs
nationwide are implementing key activities, which often include:
. Holding events, such as a Census Day "Be Counted" Parade, that generate interest and
participation.
. Distributing census information and materials through Web sites, newsletters and at
events.
(more)
USCENS
SBUREAU
census'
2010
2
-2-
. Partnering with organizations in their communities to include census messaging in their
communications.
A number of CCCs are already in place in cities nationwide, and more are forming each day.
Those interested in organizing a committee should call their regional census center or visit
20 1 O.census.gov.
ABOUT THE 2010 CENSUS
The 2010 Census is a count of everyone living in the United States and is mandated by the U.S.
Constitution. Census data are used to distribute Congressional seats to states, to distribute more
than $400 billion in federal funds to local, state and tribal governments each year and to make
decisions about what community services to provide. The 2010 Census questionnaire will be one
of the shortest in history and consists of 10 questions, taking about 10 minutes to complete. Strict
confidentiality laws protect the confidentiality of respondents and the information they provide.
-x-
Editor's note: More information, fact sheets and multimedia are available on the Census Bureau's online
newsroom. Go to www.2010census.gov.
As with all 2010 Census information, the address information collected by the Census Bureau is confidential
by law (Title 13, U.S. Code, Section 9). All Census Bureau employees have taken a lifetime oath to protect
confidentiality and are subject to a jail term, a fine - or both - for disclosing any information that could
identify a respondent or household.
USCENSUSBURE
U
census'
2010
3
Potential Stories
As members of the media, you have a unique opportunity to share news and information about
the 2010 Census and the role and activities of Complete Count Committees (CCCs) with a broad
and diverse audience. The story topics provided below will help raise awareness of CCCs and
their work plan in communities in preparation of the questionnaire mail date in March 2010.
Each of these story ideas can be easily customized with specific community information to
reflect the activities and interests of your local market. For more information or to arrange time
to speak with a Census Bureau representative, please see the Contacts section.
Story 1
Complete Count Committees: Cross Section of Community Leaders Reaching Hard-to-
Count Populations
The Census Bureau cannot conduct the 2010 Census alone. Complete Count Committees (CCCs)
are one of the core strategic elements of the regional Partnership program for the 2010 Census.
These volunteer committees established by tribal, state and local governments, and community
leaders, work best when they include a cross section of community representatives from
government agencies, education, business, faith-based organizations and the media. Through a
diverse make-up that is all-inclusive and addresses the various racial, ethnic, cultural and
geographic considerations of the community, CCC members create and implement locally-based,
grassroots outreach efforts geared toward reaching every resident, including hard-to-count
groups.
. Interview: Several community leaders that make up a local CCC - such as an elected
official, a member of a faith-based organization and representative of a local business -
about their role on the committee and its 2010 Census outreach plans.
. Visual: Cover a rally or community event with CCC or Census Bureau presence.
Story 2
Complete Count Committees: A History of Making a Difference for the Census Bureau
Since the 1980 Census, CCCs have played a major role in raising awareness of the census among
all groups and populations. The expertise, influence, knowledge and experience of CCC
members are resources that are invaluable to a successful enumeration. State and Local
Government CCCs are constructed of community members appointed by the highest elected
officials of a tribal, state, county or local governments, while Community CCCs are teams of
community leaders and/or organizations brought together to design an outreach plan for hard-to-
count areas or populations in their community. All three are driven to develop and implement
census awareness campaigns that motivate every resident to complete their census questionnaire
thoroughly and return it in a timely manner.
USCENS
SBU
EAU
census'
2010
4
. Interview: A CCC member who has been part of a CCC in a past census and who can
shed light on new challenges in 2010 and ways the CCC is addressing those in order to
ensure a complete count in their community.
. Visual: Event or activity designed to address a new challenge specific to the 2010
Census.
Story 3
Complete Count Committees: Speaking the Language ofthe Community
An integral part of achieving a complete and accurate count in the 2010 Census is identifying,
communicating and inspiring hard-to-count groups to participate. One of the most strategic and
effective ways is through the creation of CCCs, especially Community CCCs. Community CCCs
are teams of community leaders that speak the language of their community, and utilize local
knowledge, expertise and influence to design and implement a census awareness campaign
targeted to inspire others to take action and participate in the 2010 Census. Community CCCs
have the local knowledge and the ability to focus on potential problem areas such as populations
speaking languages other than English, low response rates, high number of renters, and other
hard-to-count groups. The knowledge and expertise then leads to the development of innovative
activities geared to specific groups within the community.
. Interview/visual: Cover an event geared toward a specific group within a community.
Interview CCC members about goals and details of the event as well as several event
attendees on their reactions to the event.
USCENS
SBUREAU
United States'
Census
2010
5
Complete Count Committees - Facts
The goal of the 2010 Census Complete Count Committee (CCC) Program is to convene 10,000
CCCs that are well organized, highly productive and have quality outreach strategies in place.
. A CCC is a volunteer committee established by tribal, state and local government, and
community leaders or organizations to increase awareness and motivate residents to respond
to the 2010 Census.
. CCCs exist to plan and implement locally-based outreach campaigns built on the members'
knowledge and understanding of what it takes to inspire action and raise awareness of the
census and ultimately drive participation.
. Since the 1980 Census, CCCs have played a major role in raising awareness of the census
among all groups and populations. The expertise, influence, knowledge and experience of
CCC members are invaluable resources to a successful enumeration.
. CCCs should be all-inclusive, addressing the various racial, ethnic, cultural and geographic
considerations of the community.
. Government CCCs are committees of community members appointed by the highest elected
officials of a tribal, state, county or local government for the purpose of developing and
implementing a census awareness campaign that motivates residents to complete their
questionnaire and return it in a timely manner.
. Community CCCs are made of teams of community leaders and/or organizations brought
together to design an outreach plan for hard-to-count areas or populations in their
community. Their focus is to encourage individuals in their community to complete and mail
back their questionnaire.
. Census Bureau Partner Specialists will assist tribal, state and local governments, and
nongovernmental organizations to organize and form CCCs for the 2010 Census.
USCENS
SBUREAU
census'
2010
6
Multimedia Resources
. Complete Count Committee Information
o Complete Count Committee Guide -
http://201O.census.gov/2010census/pdf/201O CCC Guide Final.pdf
o Complete Count Committee Brochure -
http://201 O.census.gov/partners/pdf/cccBrochure update.pdf
. General 2010 Census Information
o Operational Timeline -
http://201O.census.gov/2010census/about 2010 census/O 13279.html
o 2010 Census logo - http://2010.census.gov/partners/census-Iogos/
USCENS SBU E U
Census.
2010
7
2010CENSUS: IT'S IN OUR HANDS
Contacts
National Contacts
To secure a spokesperson for national stories, request additional information or to schedule an
interview, please contact:
. Census Bureau Public Information Office: (301) 763-3691 or pio.2010@census.gov
Regional Contacts
For regional/local story angles, please contact the following offices to secure an appropriate
spokesperson, request additional information or to schedule an interview:
. Atlanta Region (Alabama, Florida, Georgia) : 1-800-424-6974
. Boston Region (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Puerto
Rico, Rhode Island, Vermont): 1-800-562-5721
. Charlotte Region (Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia):
1-800-331-7360
. Chicago Region (Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin): 1-800-865-6384
. Dallas Region (Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas): 1-800-835-9752
. Denver Region (Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, New
Mexico, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming): 1-800-852-6159
. Detroit Region (Michigan, Ohio, West Virginia): 1-800-432-1495
. Kansas City Region (Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma):
1-800-728-4748
. Los Angeles Region (Southern California, Hawaii): 1-800-992-3530
USCENS
SBURE U
United States'
Census
2010
· New York Region (New York): 1-800-991-2520
. Philadelphia Region (Delaware, New Jersey, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Washington
D. C.): 1-800-262-4236
. Seattle Region (Alaska, Idaho, Northern California, Oregon, Washington):
1-800-233-3308
USCENS SBURE U
census'
2010
9