HomeMy WebLinkAbout02.03.25 Council PacketMeeting Location:
Farmington City Hall, Council
Chambers
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Monday, February 3, 2025
7:00 PM
Page
1.CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.ROLL CALL
4.APPROVE AGENDA
5.ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS
5.1. Swearing in Fire Department Personnel
Agenda Item: Swearing in Fire Department Personnel - Pdf
3
6.CITIZENS COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
(This time is reserved for citizen comments regarding non-agenda items. No
official action can be taken on these items. Speakers are limited to five minutes
to address the city council during citizen comment time.)
7.CONSENT AGENDA
7.1. Minutes of the January 16, 2025 Special Work Session
Agenda Item: Minutes of the January 16, 2025 Special Work Session -
Pdf
4 - 6
7.2. Minutes of the January 21, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting
Agenda Item: Minutes of the January 21, 2025 Regular City Council
Meeting - Pdf
7 - 14
7.3. Payment of Claims
Agenda Item: Payment of Claims - Pdf
15 - 16
Payment of Claims
7.4. Staff Approvals and Recommendations
Agenda Item: Staff Approvals and Recommendations - Pdf
17
7.5. Purchase of John Deere 1575 Tractor and Attachments 18 - 22
Page 1 of 111
Agenda Item: Purchase of John Deere 1575 Tractor and Attachments -
Pdf
7.6. Amendment to Grant Contract with State of Minnesota for Intensive
Comprehensive Police Officer Education and Training (ICPOET)
Agenda Item: Amendment to Grant Contract with State of Minnesota for
Intensive Comprehensive Police Officer Education and Training
(ICPOET) - Pdf
23 - 29
7.7. Bid for the Well No. 1 and Well No. 2 Abandonment
Agenda Item: Bid for the Well No. 1 and Well No. 2 Abandonment - Pdf
30 - 32
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
12.1. Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for the
2025 Street Improvement Final Design and Bidding
Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering,
Inc. for the 2025 Street Improvement Final Design and Bidding
Agenda Item: Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering,
Inc. for the 2025 Street Improvement Final Design and Bidding - Pdf
33 - 111
13. CITY COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
14. ADJOURN
Page 2 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: Matt Price, Fire Chief
Department: Fire
Subject: Swearing in Fire Department Personnel
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
Fire Chief Price will present the following personnel to be sworn in:
Fire Captains Matthew Donnelly, Joshua Threet, and Brian Hanson
Fire Marshal Heath Walker
Deputy Fire Chief Matthew Brown
The City Clerk will administer the Oath of Office in groups of rank.
BUDGET IMPACT:
No Impact to the budget
Page 3 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: Shirley Buecksler, City Clerk
Department: Administration
Subject: Minutes of the January 16, 2025 Special Work Session
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
For approval are the minutes of the January 16, 2025 Special Work Session.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the minutes of the January 16, 2025 Special Work Session.
ATTACHMENTS:
01.16.25 Special Work Session Minutes
Page 4 of 111
Special Work Session Minutes of January 16, 2025 Page 1 of 2
City of Farmington
City Council Special Work Session Minutes
Thursday, January 16, 2025
The City Council met in a special work session on Thursday, January 16, 2025,
at Farmington City Hall, 430 Third Street, Farmington, Minnesota.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hoyt called the meeting to order at 5:30 pm.
Members Present: Mayor Joshua Hoyt
Councilmembers Holly Bernatz, Jake Cordes,
Nick Lien, and Steve Wilson
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Lynn Gorski, City Administrator
Deanna Kuennen, Community & Economic
Development Director
Tony Wippler, Planning Manager
Amy Schmidt, City Attorney
Justin Templin, Attorney
2. APPROVE AGENDA
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Bernatz to approve the agenda as presented.
3. DISCUSSION ITEMS
3.1 Closed Session to Discuss Litigation Court File No. 19HA-CV-24-5838
Motion was made by Councilmember Lien and seconded by
Councilmember Wilson to enter into a closed session pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 13D.05, subd. 3(b) for a confidential, attorney-client
privileged discussion of litigation regarding Court File No. 19HA-CV-24-
5838.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays.
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Bernatz to re-open the meeting at 6:02 pm.
Page 5 of 111
Special Work Session Minutes of January 16, 2025 Page 2 of 2
4. ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Cordes to adjourn the meeting at 6:02 pm.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
Respectfully submitted,
Shirley R Buecksler
City Clerk
Page 6 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: Shirley Buecksler, City Clerk
Department: Administration
Subject: Minutes of the January 21, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
For approval are the minutes of the January 21, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the minutes of the January 21, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
01.21.25 Council Minutes
Page 7 of 111
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of January 21, 2025 Page 1 of 7
City of Farmington
Regular Council Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
The City Council met in regular session on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at Farmington
City Hall, 430 Third Street, Farmington, Minnesota.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hoyt called the meeting to order at 7 pm.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hoyt led everyone in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Mayor Joshua Hoyt
Councilmembers Holly Bernatz, Jake Cordes, Nick Lien, and
Steve Wilson
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Lynn Gorski, City Administrator
Deanna Kuennen, Community & Economic Development
Director
Matt Price, Fire Chief
Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director
Tony Wippler, Planning Manager
John Powell, Public Works Director
Shirley Buecksler, City Clerk
Nate Siem, Deputy Chief
Braeden Bierbrauer, Community Service Officer
Bradyn Willford, Police Officer
Gavin Janovsky, Police Officer
Daniel Miller, Police Sergeant
Casandra Redmond-Palo, Police Sergeant
4. APPROVE AGENDA
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Bernatz to approve the agenda as presented.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
Page 8 of 111
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of January 21, 2025 Page 2 of 7
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS
5.1 Swearing In Police Department Personnel
Clerk Buecksler provided the Oath of Office for:
Braeden Bierbrauer, Community Service Officer
Bradyn Willford, Police Officer
Gavin Janovsky, Police Officer
Daniel Miller, Police Sergeant
Casandra Redmond-Palo, Police Sergeant
Nathanael Siem, Deputy Chief
5.2 Resolution Accepting Toys for Town Donations
Motion was made by Councilmember Bernatz and seconded by
Councilmember Cordes to adopt Resolution 2025-11 Accepting Donations
to the Farmington Police Department Toys for Town Program.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
6. CITIZENS COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS
The following citizen(s) addressed the Council:
• Tim Galloway, President, Farmington Youth Hockey Association
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Clerk Buecksler requested that Item 7.3, Application for Gambling Premise
Permit for Farmington Youth Basketball Association, be pulled from the agenda
for further review.
7.1 Amendment to Council Policy – 02, Council-Staff Communication Protocol
7.2 Application for Gambling Event Permit for Sypal Lundgren Post dba VFW
7662; Resolution 2025-12
7.3 Application for Gambling Premise Permit for Farmington Youth Basketball
Association; Resolution 2025-10 – item pulled
7.4 Application for Tobacco License for Farmington Smoke & Vape, Inc. dba
Farmington Smoke Shop, 115 Elm Street E, Suite E, Farmington
7.5 Minutes of the January 6, 2025 Council Work Session
7.6 Minutes of the January 6, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting
7.7 Fourth Quarter 2024 New Construction Report, to Include Year End Totals
& Revenue Report
7.8 Payment of Claims
7.9 Staff Approvals and Recommendations, including the appointment of:
• Claire Kennedy as Community Service Officer
Page 9 of 111
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of January 21, 2025 Page 3 of 7
7.10 Contract with Xcel Energy for Transformer Upgrade at the Rambling River
Center
7.11 Donation from the Farmington Sons of the American Legion to the
Rambling River Center; Resolution 2025-13
7.12 Akin Road Improvement-Final Payment and Change Orders
7.13 Professional Services Agreement with WSB for Staff Augmentation
7.14 Solid Waste and Recycling Coordination Services Joint Powers Agreement
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Lien to approve the Consent Agenda, as amended.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.1 Application for On-Sale and Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License from
Granowski14 LLC dba The Mug
Mayor Hoyt opened the public hearing at 7:36 pm.
Clerk Buecksler presented the application for On-Sale and Sunday
Intoxicating Liquor License.
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Mayor Hoyt closed the public hearing at
7:38 pm.
Motion was made by Councilmember Bernatz and seconded by
Councilmember Cordes to approve an On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday
Liquor License for Granowski14 LLC dba The Mug, located at 18450 Pilot
Knob Road #A, Farmington, Minnesota, effective January 21, 2025 through
December 31, 2025.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
8.2 WITHDRAWAL – Petition to Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement over PID:
14-82500-00-040 (Outlot D, Vermillion Grove)
Mayor Hoyt opened the public hearing at 7:40 pm.
Planning Manager Wippler presented.
Seeing no one wishing to speak, Mayor Hoyt closed the public hearing at
7:40 pm.
Page 10 of 111
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of January 21, 2025 Page 4 of 7
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Lien to accept the withdrawal of the application to
vacate drainage and utility easement over PID: 14-82500-00-040 (Outlot D,
Vermillion Grove).
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
10.1 Meadowview Preserve 2nd Addition Final Plat
Planning Manager Wippler presented the final plat for Meadowview
Preserve 2nd Addition.
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Bernatz to adopt Resolution 2025-14 Approving the
Meadowview Preserve 2nd Addition Final Plat contingent upon the
following:
a. The satisfaction of all engineering comments related to the
construction plans for grading streets and utilities.
b. A Development Contract between the Developer and the City of
Farmington shall be executed, and security fees and costs shall be
paid. Submission of all other documents required under the
Development Contract shall be required.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
12.1 Appointments to Boards and Commissions for 2025
Clerk Buecksler presented for approval the 2025 appointments to boards
and commissions as follows:
BOARD/COMMISSION NAME TERM START TERM END
Parks and Recreation
Advisory Commission Katie Putt February 1, 2025 January 31, 2028
Doug Pewowaruk February 1, 2025 January 31, 2028
Planning Commission Dirk Rotty February 1, 2025 January 31, 2027
Andy Baerg February 1, 2025 January 31, 2027
Page 11 of 111
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of January 21, 2025 Page 5 of 7
Rambling River
Center Advisory
Board
Judy Janke February 1, 2025 January 31, 2028
Rachel Edwards February 1, 2025 January 31, 2028
Water Board Bill Weierke February 1, 2025 January 31, 2027
Motion was made by Councilmember Cordes and seconded by
Councilmember Lien to approve the appointments to the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Commission, Planning Commission, Rambling River
Center Advisory Board, and Water Board for 2025, as listed.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
13. CITY COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Councilmember Lien:
One comment that stuck out for me from the board interviews we had was
Bill Weierke who said he was coming up on 60 years of service to the City.
We asked him why and he said, “Well, I figure if I’ve done 60, it makes people
that have only done three or four and make it not seem so bad.” It was a
great perspective on it, and I appreciate it. It made me feel like the three
years I’ve been doing this is just a drop in the bucket. Some days it feels a
little long but it’s hard to stand next to that. Thank you, everyone, again for
that part of it.
Councilmember Bernatz:
We had some cool things happen last Friday night. Farmington High School
Theater did their One-Act and, this weekend, they are performing in the
One-Act competition. If anyone wants to go see the Theater compete, it is
a One-Act that was actually written by a high school Senior from Farmington
High School. Best of luck to them as they go out and compete and,
hopefully, make it to the next level.
Councilmember Cordes:
I want to thank outgoing commission members who recently had their last
meeting. Thank you to Lee Ann Lehto and Cody Fishman for their service on
the Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Board. I think Lee
Ann started in October of 2019 and Cody in August of 2023. Thank you for
your service to our community, and I wish them the best of luck moving
forward.
Councilmember Wilson:
On Friday, Matt Price and his team put on a fantastic banquet honoring our
amazing Fire Department, and congratulations to Mary for being our
Firefighter of the Year. It was great to be there.
Page 12 of 111
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of January 21, 2025 Page 6 of 7
This stems from something the Mayor made mention of at our last meeting,
and it bears noting, and appreciating, even three years later. Back in
February of 2022, the team of “Holly’s” (Holly Bernatz and Holly Schearer)
came to the community wanting to reimagine and reinvigorate a
community celebration that really had kind of fallen apart without
volunteers and lacked a lot of energy. The dynamic duo created probably
one of the best community events that we’ve seen in recent years, and that
continues to be so appreciated, Holly. The reason I’m pointing this out is
because the team of Holly’s, one being our Holly sitting next to us here at
the dais, were very instrumental after that time period, but there has also
been a passing of the torch and leadership and, of course, we have a
brand-new sponsor this year. The sponsor’s name may not be the same as
we’ve been used to, but I think the community celebration is going to be
even more impactful with so many more ways to get involved. So, I am
extending my appreciation again for Holly Bernatz and Holly Schearer for
the work they did to get us to this point. Get involved, be part of the group,
be part of a group that wants to take on an event, be part of the team
that’s coordinating the whole thing. There are so many different ways to get
involved. I’m guessing if you raise your hand and say you want to be
involved, there’s going to be a job for you, and you’ll feel great about it
because you found a great way to give back to the community. A long way
of saying we appreciated you three years ago before you were up here,
Holly, and we continue to appreciate the work and foundation you set.
Thank you.
Clerk Buecksler:
Two items that were approved on the Consent Agenda tonight – one is a
Gambling License for the VFW to conduct bingo in their back room, and the
other is a new Tobacco License for Farmington Smoke Shop at 115 Elm
Street.
Director Kuennen:
I would like to publicly thank Aerospace Fabrication and Materials for
opening their door and giving us a fantastic tour tonight.
There are some amazing things that happen in this community or are being
built or being manufactured, and Aerospace Fabrication is a shining
example of the creativity and intelligence, all those things that happen here
in our community. So, thank you to them for opening their doors and letting
us peek inside for an hour.
Director Powell:
Next week, the 27th through the 31st, is Winter Salt Week 2025. Salt is a very
important part of our snow and ice safety and cleanup efforts, but we
Page 13 of 111
Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of January 21, 2025 Page 7 of 7
always want to use just enough to be safe and not too much because that
chloride ends up in our lakes, water bodies, and rivers. Just one teaspoon of
salt permanently pollutes five gallons of water, so think about it that way.
That chloride collects in the water bodies, and it does not go away, it does
not dilute, it stays there. There is a wide variety of webinars that folks can
take advantage of at www.wintersaltweek.org about safe salting and ways
to use just enough and not too much to take care of our water bodies.
Director Omlid:
Congratulations to Doug Pewowaruk on his appointment to the Parks and
Recreation Commission. He attended the January meeting and got to meet
the team and then he was in last week and we met for about an hour. So,
he’ll hit the ground running. Congratulations, Doug, and welcome to the
commission.
Even though we have great outdoor ice for skating, we are thinking about
spring. Now is the time to register for recreation programs. We have a Pint
Size Prom, we have Breakfast with the Bunnies, we have some golf lessons,
clay classes with Muddy Waters, so get on the City’s website
www.farmingtonmn.gov and register for spring programs.
Chief Price:
Our Paid-on-Call had opened on January 13th. Our first information meeting
will be February 17th. It’s Presidents’ Day but gives us an opportunity to get
in a few individuals who may not have been able to do that. I don’t have
all the dates, but we do have a daytime informational meeting and two
other evening informational meetings. It closes in March, and then we will
begin the process of bringing new Firefighters on board.
14. ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by
Councilmember Bernatz to adjourn the meeting at 7:59 pm.
Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays
Respectfully submitted,
Shirley R Buecksler
City Clerk
Page 14 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: Kim Sommerland, Finance Director
Department: Finance
Subject: Payment of Claims
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
Minnesota Statutes require that all claims for payment be presented to the City Council for review
and approval.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council has established a process to review and approve claims for payment at each
regular meeting. The list of claims for the period of 01/01/2025 to 01/14/2025 is being presented for
consideration, ensuring compliance with state law and maintaining proper financial oversight.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The claims paid will reduce the available budget for the accounts listed in the detailed report
provided to the Council.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve payment of claims.
ATTACHMENTS:
Council Summary Payment of Claims 02-03-2025
Page 15 of 111
CLAIMS FOR APPROVAL 01/15/2025-01/28/2025
CHECK PAYMENTS 1,115,096.17$
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS 1,438,713.51$
TOTAL 2,553,809.68$
The City Council receives a detail list of claims paid that is available to
the public upon request.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
SUMMARY PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
February 3, 2025
Page 16 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: Lynn Gorski, City Administrator
Department: HR
Subject: Staff Approvals and Recommendations
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
Staff recommends the rehire of Aasa Just for the Paid-On-Call Firefighter position.
DISCUSSION:
Aasa Just previously worked with the Farmington Fire Department as a Paid-On-Call Firefighter
from March 28, 2011, through May 14, 2022. Mr. Just applied for an open position and was
selected through the hiring process.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The POC position is within the 2025 budget.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the rehire of Aasa Just for the Paid-On-Call Firefighter position.
Page 17 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director
Department: Parks & Recreation
Subject: Purchase of John Deere 1575 Tractor and Attachments
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
Staff is requesting approval to purchase a new 2024 John Deere 1575 Tractor (tractor), V-blade
(snowplow), and snowblower attachment.
DISCUSSION:
The current John Deere Tractor is included in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) schedule to be
replaced in 2025. The Tractor is a 2011 and needs to be replaced.
The new tractor will be used for snow removal in the downtown area, Schmitz-Maki Arena, and
along the trails downtown.
The purchase of the tractor, snowplow, and snowblower will be out of the General Capital
Equipment Fund.
BUDGET IMPACT:
Purchasing the 2024 tractor directly from the John Deere supplier is cheaper than the Minnesota
State contract price. Thus, the price for the tractor is $40,500, snowplow is $5,200, and snowblower
is $11,300 for a total price of $57,000. The General Capital Equipment Fund will cover the cost of
the purchase.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the purchase of a new 2024 John Deere 1575 Tractor, snowplow, and snowblower.
ATTACHMENTS:
John Deere 1575 Tractor Quote
Page 18 of 111
Date: 09 May 2024 Offer Expires: 31 July 2024
Confidential
30925388Quote Id:
Prepared For:
Ron Ley
CITY OF FARMINGTON
Prepared By:Daniel Kapaun
Midwest Machinery Co.
32980 Northfield Blvd.
Northfield, MN 55057
Tel: 507-645-4886
Fax: 507-645-6362
Email: dkapaun@mmcjd.com
Page 19 of 111
Salesperson : X ______________ Accepted By : X ______________
Confidential
Quote Summary
Prepared For:
Ron Ley
CITY OF FARMINGTON
Ron Ley
430 3RD ST
FARMINGTON, MN 55024
Business: 651-280-6906
RLEY@CI.FARMINGTON.MN.US
Prepared By:
Daniel Kapaun
Midwest Machinery Co.
32980 Northfield Blvd.
Northfield, MN 55057
Phone: 507-645-4886
dkapaun@mmcjd.com
Quote Id:30925388
09 May 2024
10 January 2025
Created On:
Last Modified On:
Expiration Date:31 July 2024
Equipment Summary Selling Price Qty Extended
SAMASZ 59" V TYPE -FRONT
MOUNT - 0089089
$ 5,200.00 X 1 = $ 5,200.00
2024 JOHN DEERE 1575
TerrainCut™ with ComfortCab
Commercial Front Mower (Less
Mower Deck) -
1TC1575VHRS120024
$ 40,500.00 X 1 = $ 40,500.00
2023 PRONOVOST 52"
SNOWBLOWER-FRONT
MT-1575/1585 - 61676
$ 11,300.00 X 1 = $ 11,300.00
Equipment Total $ 57,000.00
Quote Summary
Equipment Total $ 57,000.00
SubTotal $ 57,000.00
Total $ 57,000.00
Down Payment (0.00)
Rental Applied (0.00)
Balance Due $ 57,000.00
Page 20 of 111
Selling Equipment
Quote Id: 30925388 Customer:CITY OF FARMINGTON
Confidential
SAMASZ 59" V TYPE -FRONT MOUNT - 0089089
Hours:0
Stock Number:586735
Selling Price
$ 5,200.00
Code Description Qty Unit Extended
--- SAMASZ 59" V TYPE -FRONT
MOUNT
1 $ 5,200.00 $ 5,200.00
Suggested Price $ 5,200.00
Customer Discounts
Customer Discounts Total $ 0.00 $ 0.00
Total Selling Price $ 5,200.00
2024 JOHN DEERE 1575 TerrainCut™ with ComfortCab Commercial Front
Mower (Less Mower Deck) - 1TC1575VHRS120024
Hours:1
Stock Number:586080
Selling Price
$ 40,500.00
Code Description Qty Unit Extended
244BTC JOHN DEERE 1575 TERCUT 4WD
(CAB)T4 TRCT
1 $ 52,580.00 $ 52,580.00
Standard Options - Per Unit
001A COUNTRY CODE- US / CANADA 1
$ 0.00 $ 0.00
183N M MODEM 1
$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Standard Options Total $ 0.00
Dealer Attachments
UC13263 Weight, weight, 20kg suitcase weigh 5
$ 84.27 $ 421.35
TCB10303 Mounting parts 1
$ 170.77 $ 170.77
BUC11627 Light kit, led beacon light, cab 1
$ 341.65 $ 341.65
BUC11654 Light kit, rear led worklight 1
$ 216.84 $ 216.84
BTC10531 Front mwr weight transfer kit 1
$ 469.73 $ 469.73
TCB10608 Cruise control 1
$ 407.67 $ 407.67
TCU38442 Bracket - tie down, rh 1
$ 106.38 $ 106.38
TCU38441 Bracket - tie down, lh 1
$ 100.16 $ 100.16
Dealer Attachments Total $ 2,234.55
Value Added Services Total $ 0.00
Other Charges
Freight 1
$ 600.00 $ 600.00
Page 21 of 111
Selling Equipment
Quote Id: 30925388 Customer:CITY OF FARMINGTON
Confidential
Setup 1
$ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Other Charges Total $ 1,600.00
Suggested Price $ 56,414.55
Customer Discounts
Customer Discounts Total $ -15,914.55 $ -15,914.55
Total Selling Price $ 40,500.00
2023 PRONOVOST 52" SNOWBLOWER-FRONT MT-1575/1585 - 61676
Hours:0
Stock Number:568600
Selling Price
$ 11,300.00
Code Description Qty Unit Extended
--- 2023 PRONOVOST 52"
SNOWBLOWER-FRONT
MT-1575/1585
1 $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00
Suggested Price $ 12,500.00
Customer Discounts
Customer Discounts Total $ -1,200.00 $ -1,200.00
Total Selling Price $ 11,300.00
Page 22 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: Gary Rutherford, Police Chief
Department: Police
Subject: Amendment to Grant Contract with State of Minnesota for Intensive
Comprehensive Police Officer Education and Training (ICPOET)
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
The Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education and Training (ICPOET) Program provides
grant funding to assist Minnesota law enforcement agencies with hiring.
The ICPOET appropriation is designed to recruit candidates who may be interested in a career
transition into law enforcement at a time when vacancies are high across the state. At the end of
2023, the Minnesota Department of Public Safety’s Office of Justice Programs (OJP) released a
request for proposal (RFP) for law enforcement agencies to apply for this program.
DISCUSSION:
In December of 2024, the state program coordinator contacted current grantees. We were asked if
we had any further need for additional grants inside this program. Staff applied for a third ICPOET
grant at that time. In January, we were advised that we were being awarded the third grant.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The estimated cost for these three positions for compensation and education until time of
appointment as licensed Police Officers is $225,000. With the grant funding of $50,000 per
candidate, the City's unbudgeted liability is approximately $75,000. This liability can be covered by
2025 budget savings through current unfilled Staff positions. 2023 Public Safety funds could also be
used to fund these liabilities.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Please ask any questions that you may have. Staff recommends the approval of the attached
contract to allow us to amend the agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and
continue in the process to fill the third position.
ATTACHMENTS:
ICPOET Grant Agreement
Grant Amendment 012225
Page 23 of 111
Grant Contract Agreement Page 1 of 2
DPS Grant Contract Agreement Non-State (rev. March 2024)
Minnesota Department of Public Safety (“State”)
Office of Justice Programs
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 2300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2139
Grant Program:
Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education and
Training 2025
Grant Contract Agreement No.:
A-ICPOE-2025-FARMINPD-012
Grantee:
City of Farmington, Police Department
430 3rd Street, Farmington City Hall
Farmington, Minnesota 55024-8444
Grant Contract Agreement Term:
Effective Date: 12/1/2024
Expiration Date: 9/30/2025
Grantee’s Authorized Representative:
Chief of Police, Gary Rutherford
City of Farmington, Police Department
19500 Municipal Drive
Farmington, Minnesota 55024-8444
(651) 280-6701
grutherford@farmingtonmn.gov
Grant Contract Agreement Amount:
Original Agreement $100,000.00
Matching Requirement $0.00
State’s Authorized Representative:
Kristin Lail, Grants Specialist Coordinator
Office of Justice Programs
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 2300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2139
(651) 230-3358
Kristin.lail@state.mn.us
Federal Funding: CFDA/ALN: None
FAIN: N/A
State Funding: Minnesota Session Laws of 2023,
Chapter 52, Article 2, Section 3, Subdivision 8.
Special Conditions: None
Under Minn. Stat. § 299A.01, Subd 2 (4) the State is empowered to enter into this grant contract agreement.
Term: Per Minn. Stat.§16B.98, Subd. 5, the Grantee must not begin work until this grant contract agreement is
fully executed and the State's Authorized Representative has notified the Grantee that work may commence. Per
Minn.Stat.§16B.98 Subd. 7, no payments will be made to the Grantee until this grant contract agreement is fully
executed. Once this grant contract agreement is fully executed, the Grantee may claim reimbursement for
expenditures incurred pursuant to the Payment clause of this grant contract agreement. Reimbursements will only
be made for those expenditures made according to the terms of this grant contract agreement. Expiration date is
the date shown above or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will:
Perform and accomplish such purposes and activities as specified herein and in the Grantee’s approved Intensive
Comprehensive Peace Officer Education and Training 2025 Application [“Application”] which is incorporated by
reference into this grant contract agreement and on file with the State at 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 2300, St.
Paul, Minnesota 55101-2139. The Grantee shall also comply with all requirements referenced in the Intensive
Comprehensive Peace Officer Education and Training 2025 Guidelines and Application which includes the Terms
and Conditions and Grant Program Guidelines (https://app.dps.mn.gov/EGrants), which are incorporated by
reference into this grant contract agreement.
Budget Revisions: The breakdown of costs of the Grantee’s Budget is contained in Exhibit A, which is attached
and incorporated into this grant contract agreement. As stated in the Grantee’s Application and Grant Program
Guidelines, the Grantee will submit a written change request for any substitution of budget items or any deviation
and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines. Requests must be approved prior to any expenditure by
the Grantee.
Matching Requirements: (If applicable.) As stated in the Grantee’s Application, the Grantee certifies that the
matching requirement will be met by the Grantee.
Page 24 of 111
Grant Contract Agreement Page 2 of 2
DPS Grant Contract Agreement Non-State (rev. March 2024)
Payment: As stated in the Grantee’s Application and Grant Program Guidance, the State will promptly pay the
Grantee after the Grantee presents an invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized
Representative accepts the invoiced services and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines. Payment will
not be made if the Grantee has not satisfied reporting requirements.
Certification Regarding Lobbying: (If applicable.) Grantees receiving federal funds over $100,000.00 must
complete and return the Certification Regarding Lobbying form provided by the State to the Grantee.
1. ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION 3. STATE AGENCY
Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as
required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.15. Signed: _____________________________________________
(with delegated authority)
Signed: _____________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________
Grant Contract Agreement No./ P.O. No. A-ICPOE-2025-FARMINPD-012 / 3-98832
Project No.(indicate N/A if not applicable): __N/A________
2. GRANTEE
The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s)
have executed the grant contract agreement on behalf of the Grantee
as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances.
Signed: _____________________________________________
Print Name: __________________________________________
Title: _______________________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________
Signed: ______________________________________________
Print Name: __________________________________________
Title: ________________________________________________
Date: ________________________________________________
Signed: ______________________________________________
Print Name: __________________________________________
Distribution: DPS/FAS
Title: ________________________________________________ Grantee State’s Authorized Representative
Date: ________________________________________________
Page 25 of 111
Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education and Training 2025
Organization: Farmington Police Department
EXHIBIT A
A-ICPOE-2025-FARMINPD-012
Budget Summary
ICPOE: Empowering Career Transition Candidates through Peace
Officer Training
Budget Category Award
Personnel
Wages Cadet 1 - $34,176 (40 hr x 24 wks @ $35.60/hr)$20,000.00
Wages Cadet 2 - $34,176 (40 hr x 24 wks @ $35.60/hr)$20,000.00
Total $40,000.00
Payroll Taxes and Fringe
Fringe (calculated at 46%) - Cadet 1 ($15,648 full fringe)$5,000.00
Fringe (calculated at 46%) - Cadet 2 ($15,648 full fringe)$5,000.00
Total $10,000.00
Travel and Training
Tuition and Equipment Cadet 1 $25,000.00
Tuition and Equipment Cadet 2 $25,000.00
Total $50,000.00
Total $100,000.00
Page 1 of 110/08/2024
Pa
g
e
2
6
o
f
1
1
1
Grant Contract Agreement Amendment Page 1 of 2
DPS Grant Contract Agreement Amendment (rev. March 2024)
Minnesota Department of Public Safety (“State”)
Office of Justice Programs
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 2300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2139
Grant Program:
Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education and
Training 2025
Grant Contract Agreement No.:
A-ICPOE-2025-FARMINPD-012
Grant Contract Amendment No.: 1
Grantee:
City of Farmington, Police Department
430 3rd Street, Farmington City Hall
Farmington, Minnesota 55024-8444
Grant Contract Agreement Term:
Effective Date: 12/1/2024
Expiration Date: 9/30/2025 12/31/2025
Grant Matching Requirement:
Original Agreement Amount $0.00
Previous Amendment(s) Total $0.00
Current Amendment Amount $0.00
Total Agreement Amount $0.00
Grantee Contract Agreement Amount:
Original Agreement Amount $100,000.00
Previous Amendment(s) Total $0.00
Current Amendment Amount $50,000.00
Total Agreement Amount $150,000.00
State’s Authorized Representative:
Kristin Lail, Grants Specialist Coordinator
Office of Justice Programs
445 Minnesota Street, Suite 2300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2139
(651) 230-3358
Kristin.lail@state.mn.us
Federal Funding: CFDA/ALN: None
FAIN: N/A
State Funding: Minnesota Session Laws of 2023,
Chapter 52, Article 2, Section 3, Subdivision 8.
Special Conditions: None
In this Amendment deleted agreement terms will be struck out and added agreement terms will be underlined.
The Original Grant Contract Agreement and all previous amendments are incorporated into this amendment by
reference.
1.ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION 3. STATE AGENCY
Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as
required by Minn. Stat. § 16A.15. Signed: _______________________________ ___________
(with delegated authority)
Signed: _____________________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________
Grant Agreement No./PO No: A-ICPOE-2025-FARMINPD-012 / 3-98832
Project No.(indicate N/A if not applicable): ___N/A____________
2.GRANTEE
The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s)
have executed the grant contract agreement on behalf of the Grantee as
required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances.
Signed: ____________________________________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Date: ______________________________________________
-continued-
Page 27 of 111
Grant Contract Agreement Amendment Page 2 of 2
DPS Grant Contract Agreement Amendment (rev. March 2024)
Signed: ___________________________________________
Print Name: _______________________________________
Distribution: DPS/FAS
Title: _____________________________________________
Date: _____________________________________________
Grantee
State’s Authorized Representative
Signed: ____________________________________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Date: ______________________________________________
Page 28 of 111
Intensive Comprehensive Peace Officer Education and Training 2025 Revised - EXHIBIT A
Organization: Farmington Police Department A-ICPOE-2025-FARMINPD-012
Budget Summary
ICPOE: Empowering Career Transition Candidates through Peace
Officer Training
Budget Category Award
Personnel
Wages Cadet 1 - $34,176 (40 hr x 24 wks @ $35.60/hr)$20,000.00
Wages Cadet 2 - $34,176 (40 hr x 24 wks @ $35.60/hr)$20,000.00
Wages Cadet 3 - $34,176 (40 hr x 24 wks @$35.60/hour)$20,000.00
Total $60,000.00
Payroll Taxes and Fringe
Fringe (calculated at 46%) - Cadet 1 ($15,648 full fringe)$5,000.00
Fringe (calculated at 46%) - Cadet 2 ($15,648 full fringe)$5,000.00
Fringe (calculated at 46%) - Cadet 3 ($15,648 full fringe)$5,000.00
Total $15,000.00
Travel and Training
Tuition and Equipment Cadet 1 $25,000.00
Tuition and Equipment Cadet 2 $25,000.00
Tuition and Equipment Cadet 3 $25,000.00
Total $75,000.00
Total $150,000.00
Page 1 of 101/22/2025
Pa
g
e
2
9
o
f
1
1
1
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: John Powell, Public Works Director
Department: Engineering
Subject: Bid for the Well No. 1 and Well No. 2 Abandonment
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
As Well No. 1 and Well No. 2 are no longer being used, they need to be removed from service and
properly abandoned in order to protect the groundwater supply. The City has obtained a bid for the
abandonment of the wells and demolition of the well house structure; staff is recommending the bid
be rejected due to cost.
DISCUSSION:
Well 1 and Well 2 are located in a structure near the northwest corner of the Rambling River Center
(RRC). Well 2 has not been active for decades, and Well 1 was last used to regularly support the
City's pumping capacity in 2021. Both of these wells are about 400 feet deep and were drilled to the
Prairie du Chien/Jordan aquifer. Well 1 was constructed in 1938 and has far exceeded its 60-year
design life.
To remove any obstructions for the planned or future RRC building and area improvements, the
well project was expanded to include the complete abandonment of the wells, removal of all
equipment, and demolition of the structure. It is expected that the well driller would complete the
well video survey and gamma log (to determine the existing conditions within the wells) immediately
upon contract award and propose a plan to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for sealing
each well. While MDH is reviewing the proposed course of action, the well house demolition and
utility capping would be taking place.
An advertisement for bids was posted in the Dakota County Tribune on December 20 and 27, 2024
and on the QuestCDN website. Bids were due at 2:00 pm on January 15, 2025. The City received
only one bid, from Minger Construction Company in the amount of $393,785.00. A comparison of
the Minger bid to the Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) is attached.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The low bid is about 24.5% over the estimated construction cost. Factors contributing to the higher
cost include:
Abandoning a well, similar to drilling a new well, is highly specialized work and there are not
many drillers of public wells in the metropolitan area.
The proposed schedule assumes most of the building and well work is performed in winter
Page 30 of 111
conditions to have the site cleared at the same time as the planned improvements to the
RRC.
The contractor will not be able to prepare their well sealing plan, and propose it to the MDH
for approval, until they have removed the pumps and researched the existing well conditions.
As they don't know how long the MDH may take to review the well sealing plan, this creates
risk for the contractor in meeting their contract deadlines, which is likely reflected in the bid.
While Minger is very capable of completing this work, staff is recommending their bid be rejected
due to cost. The project will be re-bid for summer construction; this is not expected to interfere with
completion of the RRC improvements. Staff will explore options for reducing the project cost; which
may include obtaining approval for the well sealing plan under a separate contract, thereby
providing more certainty for the abandonment bid quantities.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Reject the bid received for the Well No. 1 and Well No. 2 Abandonment.
ATTACHMENTS:
Farmington Well Abandonment - Bid Tab - Summary for City - 01.14.25
Page 31 of 111
Farmington Well No. 1 and No. 2 Abandonment (#9448345)
Owner: City of Farmington
Solicitor: AE2S - Bismarck, ND
01/14/2025 02:00 PM CST
Schedule A: All Construction not Related to Well Abandonment
Item No.Item Qty Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount
Schedule A:
A.01 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION; SITE WORK 1 LS $24,926.00 $24,926.00 $58,000.00 $58,000.00
A.02 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) (P)60 CY $25.00 $1,500.00 $200.00 $12,000.00
A.03 COMMON BORROW GRANULAR FILL (CV)65 CY $50.00 $3,250.00 $125.00 $8,125.00
A.04 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 45 SY $5.50 $247.50 $40.00 $1,800.00
A.05 SAW CUT PAVEMENT 62 LF $3.50 $217.00 $4.00 $248.00
A.06 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT 28 SY $7.50 $210.00 $40.00 $1,120.00
A.07 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER 31 LF $4.00 $124.00 $22.00 $682.00
A.08 REMOVE WATERMAIN 27 LF $20.00 $540.00 $125.00 $3,375.00
A.09 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
A.10 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SPWEA230C)9 TON $131.50 $1,183.50 $420.00 $3,780.00
A.11 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (B612)52 LF $35.00 $1,820.00 $55.00 $2,860.00
A.12 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (4")57 SF $10.00 $570.00 $55.00 $3,135.00
A.13 TURF ESTABLISHMENT 1 LS $1,310.00 $1,310.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00
A.14 PAVEMENT MARKINGS 75 LF $2.50 $187.50 $4.00 $300.00
A.15 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 52 LB $20.00 $1,040.00 $30.00 $1,560.00
A.16 WELLHOUSE DEMOLITION 1 LS $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00
Total Schedule A: All Construction not Related to Well Abandonment $94,626 $157,185.00
TOTAL BASE QUOTE (SCHEDULE A)$94,626 $157,185.00
Schedule B: Well No. 1 and No. 2 Abandonment
Item No.Item Qty Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount
Schedule B:
B.01 WELL 1 REMOVE PUMPING EQUIPMENT AND CAP 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00
B.02 WELL 2 REMOVE PUMPING EQUIPMENT AND CAP 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00
B.03 WELL 1 SEALING MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00
B.04 WELL 1 IMPORTED SAND FOR SEALING 100 CY $130.00 $13,000.00 $182.00 $18,200.00
B.05 WELL 1 GROUT FOR SEALING 30 CY $1,600.00 $48,000.00 $1,100.00 $33,000.00
B.06 WELL 1 PERFORATION, IF NEEDED 50 LF $115.00 $5,750.00 $182.00 $9,100.00
B.07 WELL 1 DRILL & BAIL FROM 196' TO 402', IF NEEDED 100 CY $170.40 $17,040.00 $245.00 $24,500.00
B.08 WELL 2 SEALING MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00
B.09 WELL 2 IMPORTED SAND FOR SEALING 100 CY $130.00 $13,000.00 $182.00 $18,200.00
B.10 WELL 2 GROUT FOR SEALING 30 CY $1,600.00 $48,000.00 $1,100.00 $33,000.00
B.11 WELL 2 PERFORATION, IF NEEDED 50 LF $115.00 $5,750.00 $182.00 $9,100.00
B.12 WELL 2 DRILL & BAIL FROM 197' TO 399', IF NEEDED 100 CY $170.40 $17,040.00 $245.00 $24,500.00
B.13 WELL VIDEO SURVEY AND GAMMA LOG 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
B.14 SITE RESTORATION RELATED TO SEALING 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
Total Schedule B: Well No. 1 and No. 2 Abandonment $206,580 $236,600.00
TOTAL BASE QUOTE (SCHEDULE B)$206,580 $236,600.00
Base Bid Total
OPCC Base Bid Total: $301,206 393,785.00$
5% Contingency:$15,060
Estimated Total Construction Cost:$316,266
Engineers Estimate Minger Construction Co. Inc.
AE2S OPCC Breakdown:
Page 32 of 111
REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator
From: John Powell, Public Works Director
Department: Engineering
Subject: Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for the 2025 Street
Improvement Final Design and Bidding
Meeting: Regular Council - Feb 03 2025
INTRODUCTION:
At the July 15, 2024 City Council meeting, a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) was approved
with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for preparation of a 30% design along with a feasibility report for the
2025 Street Improvements. The project area includes the following roadways:
Sunnyside Drive - Ash Street (CSAH 74) to Centennial Drive
Fairview Lane - Sunnyside Drive to Park Drive
Centennial Drive - Fairview Lane to Sunnyside Drive
Centennial Court - Centennial Drive to north end
Sunnyside Circle - Sunnyside Drive to west end
The attached Feasibility Report will be presented, which includes estimated costs as well as
recommendations Lane Drive/Fairview Centennial the width, realignment roadway for of
intersection, and cul-de-sac concepts.
The requested action will allow the consultant to continue with the design process.
DISCUSSION:
Early in 2023, the City Council approved the Consultant Pool for 2023-2027. Alliant Engineering is
one of the firms in the Consultant Pool and has prepared the attached scope and budget based on
discussions with City Staff. Major tasks included in the scope are the following:
Project Management
Final Design and Construction Documents
Public Engagement
Utility Coordination
Permitting
Bidding Assistance
Page 33 of 111
Per the Feasibility Report, the expected schedule is as follows:
March 3, 2025 City Council Receives Plans & Authorizes Advertisement for Bids
April 7, 2025 City Council Awards Construction Contract
April 2025 Pre-Construction Meeting
May 2025 Neighborhood Meeting
May 15, 2025 Begin Construction
September 30, 2025 Substantial Completion
October 15, 2025 Final Completion
October 2027 Two-Year Warranty Inspection
BUDGET IMPACT:
Work under this contract will be billed hourly for a cost not to exceed $35,970. As identified in the
approved 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan, the funding sources for this project area are as
follows:
Funding Source Amount
G.O. Bonds $ 1,500,000
Sewer Fund $ 450,000
Stormwater Fund $ 450,000
Water Fund $ 600,000
Total $ 3,000,000
The estimated project cost in the Feasibility Report of $3,804,590 exceeds the identified funding
amount by about 27% but also includes a 10% contingency and 18% for other costs such as
engineering, surveying, soil borings, materials testing, sewer televising, permits, etc.
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for the 2025 Street
Improvement Final Design and Bidding
ATTACHMENTS:
2025 Street Improvement Feasibility Report 020325
030225 PSA Alliant 2025 Street Improvement final design
Page 34 of 111
February 3, 2025
4000383-00
Prepared for:
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Prepared by:
Alliant Engineering
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Feasibility Report
CITY OF FARMINGTON – 2025 STREET
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Page 35 of 111
PAGE i
Certification
Feasibility Report
for
2025 Street Improvements Project
Prepared for:
City of Farmington
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or
under my direction supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
By: ____________________________________________
Eric Nelson, PE
License No. 43560
Page 36 of 111
PAGE ii
Table of Contents
Certification Page
Table of Contents ................................................................... ii
1. Executive Summary ........................................................... 1
2. Project Location ................................................................ 1
2.1 Project History ............................................................................................................... 1
2.2 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................ 1
3. Proposed Improvements .................................................... 2
3.1 Roadway Width.............................................................................................................. 2
3.2 Storm Sewer .................................................................................................................. 3
3.3 Watermain .................................................................................................................... 3
3.4 Sanitary Sewer ............................................................................................................... 3
3.5 Design Improvements at Individual Locations ................................................................. 3
4. Right-of-Way and Easements ............................................. 5
5. Private Utilities/Wetlands/Trees ........................................ 5
5.1 Private Utilities .............................................................................................................. 5
5.2 Wetlands ....................................................................................................................... 5
5.3 Trees ............................................................................................................................. 5
6. Permits and Approvals ....................................................... 5
7. Operational Issues and Costs ............................................ 6
8. Opinion of Probable Cost ................................................... 6
9. Proposed Funding .............................................................. 6
9.1 Proposed funding .......................................................................................................... 6
Page 37 of 111
PAGE iii
9.2 Proposed Assessments ................................................................................................. 7
9.3 Project Schedule ........................................................................................................... 7
10. Public Involvement ............................................................ 8
11. Feasibility and Recommendations ..................................... 9
11.1 Feasibility ...................................................................................................................... 9
11.2 Recommendation ........................................................................................................ 10
12. Appendices ..................................................................... 10
Page 38 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 1
1. Executive Summary
As a result of this study, we conclude that improvements to the city streets identified in the 2025
Street Improvements Project are feasible. These improvements include replacement of roadway
pavement and curb and gutter, intersection enhancements, storm sewer and drainage
improvements, and replacement of watermain. The reduced impervious area within the project
boundary will provide stormwater management benefits and reduce long-term asset management
costs. The estimated project cost, including a 10% construction contingency and an 18%
allowance for indirect costs, is $3,804,590.
2. Project Location
The project area (depicted on the map in Appendix A) includes the following residential roadways,
generally located south of 220th Street and west of Chippendale Avenue (CSAH 3):
• Sunnyside Drive - Ash Street (CSAH 74) to Centennial Drive
• Fairview Lane - Sunnyside Drive to Park Drive
• Centennial Drive - Fairview Lane to Sunnyside Drive
• Centennial Court - Centennial Drive to north end
• Sunnyside Circle - Sunnyside Drive to west end
2.1 PROJECT HISTORY
On July 15, 2024, the City Council ordered the preparation of a feasibility study for the 2025 Street
Improvements Project (City Project No. 25-01). State Statutes dictate that a feasibility study can
either be initiated by a petition of the affected property owners, or at the direction of the City
Council. This project was initiated at the direction of the City Council.
The 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) lists many projects planned for
implementation in that five-year span. The various projects listed in the CIP must be considered
individually before implementation. This report is intended to consider the roadway segments
listed above. Identification of these areas is a result of the City’s ongoing Pavement Management
Program. The program was implemented to maximize the useful life of the City’s streets.
2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
The streets within the project area were originally constructed in the early 1960’s in conjunction
with residential development. Along with all other bituminous roadways in the city, the roadways
in this neighborhood were assigned a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) based on observable
surface conditions. Ratings range from 0 to 100 with 0 being a roadway in very poor conditions,
and 100 being a new roadway.
Page 39 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 2
Roadway PCI
Sunnyside Drive 10, 25, 37 (Three rating segments in project area)
Fairview Lane 6
Centennial Drive 10, 7 (Two rating segments in project area)
Centennial Court 21
Sunnyside Circle 32
The pavement in the project area has reached the end of its useful life.
The existing roadways consist of bituminous pavement with concrete curb and gutter on both
sides of the streets. The streets are generally 38 feet wide between faces of curb, with B618 curb
and gutter throughout (vertical curb 6 inches high, 18 inch gutter width). The existing roadway
typical section is shown in Appendix B.
Most stormwater runoff is conveyed through surface drainage to storm sewer at intersection low
points. This storm sewer ultimately discharges to the east across Chippendale Avenue and into
regional stormwater ponds. Several areas within the project have relatively flat profile grades,
which lead to occasional standing water and contribute to pavement degradation. Concrete valley
gutters in several locations are deteriorating and requiring frequent maintenance.
All homes within the project area are served by city-owned watermain and sanitary sewer systems.
Watermains are 6-inch cast iron pipes with copper services to each household. Sanitary sewer
mains are generally 8-inch diameter with varying material types.
3. Proposed Improvements
The following sections describe the key design aspects that were considered as alternatives for
the 2025 Street Improvements Project were evaluated.
3.1 ROADWAY WIDTH
The streets within the project area currently measure 36 feet between faces of curb. The current
City of Farmington standard for new residential streets is 32 feet. Two alternatives were evaluated
relative to roadway width:
· Match existing 36-foot width.
· Reduce width to 32 feet to match current city standards.
Reducing the roadway width to 32 feet has several benefits, while still providing safe and
functional public infrastructure. These benefits include:
· Reduced stormwater runoff and urban heat island effect through elimination of
unnecessary impervious area
Page 40 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 3
· Decreased long-term pavement management costs
· Ability to improve steep driveway grades adjacent to roadways
· Visual cue to drivers to reduce speeds based on narrower roadways
The Proposed Conditions maps in Appendix B show the project area with the included streets
constructed at a 32-foot width. Typical sections for both the existing and proposed conditions are
also included in Appendix B.
3.2 STORM SEWER
Several residents noted issues with standing water and localized flooding in their survey responses
and during discussions at open house meetings. Reconstruction of the streets allows the
opportunity to increase profile grades to better direct runoff to low points and through street
intersections. Existing concrete valley gutters that need frequent maintenance and disrupt the
driving surface can be eliminated through these grading improvements.
The Proposed Conditions maps in Appendix B show the locations where additional storm sewer is
proposed to improve street drainage. Storm inlets and storm sewer are proposed at the
intersections of Centennial Drive/Sunnyside Drive and Fairview Lane/Sunnyside Drive and runoff
captured in this added storm sewer can be routed to the existing storm sewer trunk line at the
Fairview Lane/Sunnyside Drive intersection. The added storm sewer does not create issues with
storm sewer capacity or require stormwater management treatment practices since the overall
impervious area is being reduced.
3.3 WATERMAIN
Based on the age and size of the existing watermain within the project area, the City of Farmington
Water Board has recommended full replacement of the watermain with 12-inch ductile iron pipe
along Sunnyside Drive and 8-inch ductile iron pipe throughout the rest of the project area.
Individual water services will be replaced between the new main and the right-of-way line.
3.4 SANITARY SEWER
City staff have inspected the condition of the sanitary sewer trunk lines in the project area and
deemed that full replacement is not merited at this time. A future pipe lining project will include
the sewer withing the project area after the street reconstruction project is complete.
3.5 DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS AT INDIVIDUAL LOCATIONS
Three locations within the project area were evaluated for additional design improvements.
Summaries of these evaluations are provided below. Graphics showing the design alternatives
considered are included in Appendix B.
Page 41 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 4
Centennial Drive/Fairview Lane Intersection
The current intersection has large curb radii in the southwest and southeast quadrants that do not
define a clear right-of-way between drivers on Centennial Drive and Fairview Lane. Additionally,
flat grades in the intersection require a concrete valley gutter across the intersection to convey
stormwater runoff.
The proposed concept shown in Appendix B relocates the curb lines with smaller radii to form a
more conventional T-intersection. This helps provide driver clarity by defining traffic on Centennial
Drive as the through movement. Additional analysis will be done to determine if a stop sign for
drivers on Fairview Lane is needed. The revised curb design also allows better longitudinal grades
along the gutter lines and eliminates the need for the concrete valley gutter.
Centennial Court
Centennial Court is currently a cul-de-sac with a 72-foot-width at its intersection with Centennial
Drive. This opening width is significantly wider than what is needed for safe access and mobility
and creates unnecessary and unused pavement surface.
Two concepts were developed for modifying Centennial Court and both are included in Appendix
B. The first reduces the opening width to 32 feet to match the proposed street width throughout
the project area. The remaining curb line would be modified to develop a more conventional cul-
de-sac with a 75-foot diameter in the “bulb” area. The residential driveway in the northwest
quadrant of the intersection would be extended to meet the new curb line. The second concept
maintains the outside curb lines but creates a raised median island to define northbound and
southbound lanes at the intersection. The intent of this concept is to limit curb line and driveway
changes while reducing unnecessary impervious area.
Sunnyside Drive Bump Out
In the northeast area of the project, Sunnyside Drive has a “bump out” to form a partial cul-de-sac
along four residential driveways. This bump out was constructed with very flat longitudinal grades
along the gutter line. Several residents noted standing water and drainage issues during public
engagement efforts. Additionally, the added impervious surface area in the bump out provides no
benefit in terms of safety, access, or traffic operations.
The concept included in Appendix B develops a median island in the bump out area to accomplish
two main benefits:
· Median grading improves the pavement cross-slope to eliminate the standing water and
surface drainage issues.
· Vegetated median island reduces stormwater runoff and other costs/impacts from
unnecessary impervious surface.
Page 42 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 5
4. Right-of-Way and Easements
The existing right-of-way is generally 60-feet wide throughout the project area. No permanent
right-of-way acquisition or temporary easements are needed for the proposed improvements. If
any issues arise requiring access outside of the existing right-of-way and easements, staff will
handle these on a case-by-case basis and work with the affected property owner to obtain a right
of entry.
5. Private Utilities/Wetlands/Trees
5.1 PRIVATE UTILITIES
Private utilities were mapped throughout the project area through the Gopher State One Call
process. Marked utility locations were collected in conjunction with the topographic survey of the
project area. Given the nature of the project, impacts to private utilities are expected to be
minimal. A utility coordination meeting will be held during the final design process and prior to
construction.
5.2 WETLANDS
No wetland areas are affected by the proposed project.
5.3 TREES
Tree locations were inventoried and mapped as part of the topographic survey process. The
condition of the trees within the project area were reviewed by the City’s Natural Resource
Specialist. Ash trees within the public right of way, as well as trees with declining health, poor
structural stability, or trees that are replaceable with existing nursery stock, are candidates for
removal prior to construction activities. In addition, large healthy trees growing too close to a
project that involves major soil disturbance of any kind should be removed to avoid conflicts with
the construction activity. Additional field review of trees by city staff, and discussions with
residents as needed, will occur in spring 2025 ahead of anticipated construction.
6. Permits and Approvals
The following permits are required for the proposed improvements:
· Based on the expected disturbed area exceeding one acre, a Construction Stormwater
permit is required including preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP).
· Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Permit – Required for replacement of watermain.
Page 43 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 6
7. Operational Issues and Costs
If the recommended reduction in roadway width and other design modifications proceed,
operational costs are expected to decrease due to the reduced pavement surface. The decreased
costs would include direct reductions in pavement management life cycle costs and other indirect
reductions from reduced stormwater runoff and improved surface drainage.
8. Opinion of Probable Cost
A detailed estimate of construction costs is included in Appendix C and a summary of estimated
costs is provided below in Table 1. The construction costs listed include design contingencies
based on the preliminary design and recent construction bids.
Table 1. Summary of Estimated Costs
Cost Summary
Construction Costs:
Street Improvements $1,852,090
Watermain Improvements $1,024,970
Sanitary Sewer Improvements $ 25,410
Storm Sewer Improvements $ 321,760
Construction Total: $3,224,230
Engineering and Administration Costs (18%) $ 580,360
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS: $3,804,590
9. Proposed Funding
9.1 PROPOSED FUNDING
The 2025 - 2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies $3,000,000 for the 2025 Street
Improvements with funding sources as follows:
G.O. Debt $ 1,500,000
Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 450,000
Stormwater Fund $ 450,000
Water Fund $ 600,000
TOTAL $ 3,000,000
Page 44 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 7
Based on the estimated project cost and scope, the recommended funding sources are as follows:
G.O. Debt $ 2,185,470
Sanitary Sewer Fund $ 29,980
Stormwater Fund $ 379,680
Water Trunk Fund $ 207,030
Water Fund $ 1,002,430
TOTAL $ 3,804,590
Trunk improvements are identified in the city’s May 19, 2024, Assessment Policy, as follows:
Sanitary Sewer Lateral: Sanitary sewer mains 8" or less in diameter and buried to a depth of 8' or
less, 4' diameter or less manholes, and all appropriate appurtenances or equivalent costs of
oversized mains.
Water Lateral: Water mains 8" or less in diameter and buried to a depth of 7' or less, hydrants,
leads, gate valves, and all appropriate appurtenances on equivalent costs of oversized mains.
Storm Sewer Lateral: Storm sewer mains 21" or less in diameter and buried to a depth of 8' or less,
4' diameter or less manholes, catch basins, leads, and all appropriate appurtenances; or
equivalent costs of oversized mains.
Sanitary Sewer Trunk: Sanitary sewer main costs that are not considered sanitary sewer lateral
costs.
Water Trunk: Water main costs that are not considered water lateral costs.
Storm Sewer Trunk: Storm sewer costs that are not considered storm sewer lateral costs.
Based on these definitions, and the 30% design, water trunk funding has been identified due to the
12” ductile iron watermain.
9.2 PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
Since the proposed project is included in the city’s Capital Improvement Plan, special
assessments to abutting properties will not be used as a funding source on this project.
Page 45 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 8
Order Feasibility Report July 15, 2024
Neighborhood Meeting 1 (background, issues, etc.) August 28, 2024
Neighborhood Meeting 2 (base map, preliminary information) October 8, 2024
Neighborhood Meeting 3 (review of design concepts) January 7, 2025
Receive Feasibility Report February 3, 2025
City Council Authorizes Preparation of Plans and
Specifications and PSA
February 3, 2025
Council Receives Plans and Specifications and Authorizes
Advertisement for Bids
March 3, 2025
Ad for Bid to Finance and Commerce March 4, 2025
Publication Dates for Finance and Commerce March 7 and 14, 2025
Ad for Bid to Dakota County Tribune March 4, 2025
Publication Dates for Dakota County Tribune March 7 and 14, 2025
Receive Bids April 2, 2025
Award Contract April 7, 2025
Pre-construction Meeting April 2025
Neighborhood Meeting (with contractor, pre-construction) May 2025
Begin Construction May 15, 2025
Construction Substantially Complete September 30, 2025
Construction Final Completion October 15, 2025
Two Year Warranty Inspection (after final payment and
acceptance)
October 2027
10. Public Involvement
The public involvement process began with an introductory letter about the project sent to 67
addresses within the project area. The letter included the map of the project in Appendix A and a
survey for residents to share any known issues with city staff. Nine residences submitted survey
responses. Three open houses were held to discuss the project, and a high-level summary of each
meeting is provided below. All open house meetings had city staff and representatives from Alliant
in attendance to answer questions and discuss the project.
Open House Meeting 1 – August 28, 2024
The purpose of this meeting was to introduce the project, discuss overall goals, and gather
feedback on known issues that residents are experiencing. Six residents signed in, and staff
estimate another 4 to 6 residents attended. Feedback largely centered around drainage issues,
driveway considerations, and construction timing/disturbance.
Page 46 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 9
Open House Meeting 2 – October 8, 2024
The purpose of this meeting was to start preliminary discussions on design considerations on
roadway width, intersection configuration, and continuation of any topics discussed at the first
meeting. Only two residents attended this meeting and chose not to sign in but did not express
any specific concerns.
Open House Meeting 3 – January 7, 2025
The purpose of this meeting was to solicit specific feedback on the proposed roadway narrowing
and the design concepts shown in Appendix B. The maps in Appendix B were included with the
mailing about the open house to encourage input, especially from those living adjacent to the
areas with proposed changes.
Eight residents attended the open house and generally expressed support for reducing the
roadway width and converting Centennial Drive/Fairview Lane into a T-intersection. There was
general support for the raised median island in the Sunnyside Drive bump out, but no residents
that live directly in this area were in attendance. At Centennial Court, reducing the opening width
to 32 feet was preferred over the center island concept. However, no residents from Centennial
Court attended the meeting.
Additional neighborhood meetings would be scheduled as needed. The Contractor will be present
at a meeting held prior to construction to address issues such as access, noise levels, working
hours, project schedule and contacts.
11. Feasibility and Recommendations
11.1 FEASIBILITY
The 2025 Street Improvements Project is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an
engineering standpoint. Based on the finding of this feasibility study, we recommend proceeding
with the following:
· Proceed with final design of the improvements that incorporates:
o Reduction of street width from 36 feet to 32 feet
o Modify the Centennial Drive/Fairview Lane intersection to a T-intersection
o Modify Centennial Court to reduce the opening width to 32 feet and construct a
conventional cul-de-sac
o Modify the Sunnyside Drive bump out to include a median island to improve
drainage
Page 47 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
4000383-00
PAGE 10
11.2 RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City proceed with the improvements as proposed in this report.
12. Appendices
A. Location Map
B. Design Concepts
C. Preliminary Cost Estimate
D. Geotechnical Report
Page 48 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
4000383-00
Appendix A
LOCATION MAP
City of Farmington – 2025 Street
Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
Page 49 of 111
Page 50 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
4000383-00
City of Farmington – 2025 Street
Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
Appendix B
DESIGN CONCEPTS
Page 51 of 111
12
1
6
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
8
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
2
0
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
13
0
1
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
60
0
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
60
2
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
60
4
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
60
6
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
60
8
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
61
0
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
61
2
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
61
4
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
61
6
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
12
1
9
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
60
1
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
60
3
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
60
5
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
60
9
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
61
1
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
12
2
0
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
1
8
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
PL
O
T
T
E
D
B
Y
:
CO
L
E
A
D
A
M
S
O
N
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
2
1
,
2
0
2
5
A
T
11
:
5
5
:
5
4
A
M
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
X:
\
4
0
0
0
3
8
3
-
0
0
\
A
U
T
O
C
A
D
\
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
4
0
0
0
3
8
3
-
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
D
W
G
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2025 STREET IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 1 OF 3
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
N
CENTENNIAL DR
SU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
CE
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
LEGEND
STREET RECONSTRUCTION AREA
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK
BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
MATCHLINE B - SEE SHEET 2MATCHLINE A - SEE SHEET 2
PARK DR
Pa
g
e
5
2
o
f
1
1
1
11
1
2
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
2
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
0
4
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
0
6
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
0
8
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
0
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
2
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
4
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
6
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
7
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
1
5
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
1
1
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
9
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
7
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
5
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
3
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
1
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
11
1
9
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
11
1
5
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
60
5
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
60
7
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
60
9
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
T
12
1
8
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
1
4
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
1
0
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
6
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
2
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
0
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
12
0
3
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
0
5
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
0
9
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
1
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
12
1
5
F
A
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
PL
O
T
T
E
D
B
Y
:
CO
L
E
A
D
A
M
S
O
N
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
2
1
,
2
0
2
5
A
T
11
:
5
6
:
3
3
A
M
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
X:
\
4
0
0
0
3
8
3
-
0
0
\
A
U
T
O
C
A
D
\
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
4
0
0
0
3
8
3
-
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
D
W
G
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2025 STREET IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 2 OF 3
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
N
SU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
N
SU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
LEGEND
STREET RECONSTRUCTION AREA
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK
BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
MATCHLINE B - SEE SHEET 1MATCHLINE A - SEE SHEET 1
MATCHLINE C - SEE SHEET 3
Pa
g
e
5
3
o
f
1
1
1
520 ASH ST
1104 SUNNYSIDE DR
50
2
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
50
4
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
506 SUNNYSIDE CIR
50
8
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
51
0
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
1108 SUNNYSIDE DR
1112 SUNNYSIDE DR
1202 FAIRVIEW LN
1204 FAIRVIEW LN
1115 SUNNYSIDE DR
1109 SUNNYSIDE DR
1107 SUNNYSIDE DR
1105 SUNNYSIDE DR
1103 SUNNYSIDE DR 600 ASH ST
PL
O
T
T
E
D
B
Y
:
CO
L
E
A
D
A
M
S
O
N
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
2
1
,
2
0
2
5
A
T
11
:
5
7
:
3
0
A
M
FI
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
:
X:
\
4
0
0
0
3
8
3
-
0
0
\
A
U
T
O
C
A
D
\
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
D
E
S
I
G
N
\
4
0
0
0
3
8
3
-
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
L
A
Y
O
U
T
.
D
W
G
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2025 STREET IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 3 OF 3
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
N
SUNNYSIDE DR
S
U
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
C
I
R
22
0
T
H
S
T
W
LEGEND
STREET RECONSTRUCTION AREA
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALK
BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
C
-
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
2
Pa
g
e
5
4
o
f
1
1
1
CITY OF FARMINGTON
2025 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
TYPICAL SECTIONS
Page 55 of 111
Page 56 of 111
Page 57 of 111
Page 58 of 111
Page 59 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
4000383-00
City of Farmington – 2025 Street
Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
Appendix C
PRELIMINARY COST
ESTIMATE
Page 60 of 111
PROJECT 2025 STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT LOCATION:CITY OF FARMINGTON
CITY PROJECT NO.:25-01
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 100,000.00$ 1 100,000.00$
2 2101.502 CLEARING EACH 300.00$ 47 14,100.00$
3 2101.502 GRUBBING EACH 200.00$ 47 9,400.00$
4 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 6.00$ 9850 59,100.00$
5 2104.501 REMOVE RETAINING WALL LF 20.00$ 40 800.00$
6 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SF 2.00$ 900 1,800.00$
7 2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 15.00$ 900 13,500.00$
8 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 10.00$ 600 6,000.00$
9 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 50.00$ 10 500.00$
10 2104.602 SALVAGE AND INSTALL MAILBOX EACH 260.00$ 31 8,060.00$
11 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LF 3.00$ 135 405.00$
12 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (CV) CY 25.00$ 5100 127,500.00$
13 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (CV) CY 20.00$ 5500 110,000.00$
14 2105.522 AGGREGATE BACKFILL (CV) CY 30.00$ 5500 165,000.00$
15 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 180.00$ 40 7,200.00$
16 2130.523 WATER (DUST CONTROL) MGAL 70.00$ 100 7,000.00$
17 2211.502 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (CV)(P) CY 45.00$ 3800 171,000.00$
18 2360.501 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 85.00$ 1100 93,500.00$
19 2360.502 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) TON 85.00$ 1800 153,000.00$
20 2411.603 INSTALL RETAINING WALL LF 75.00$ 40 3,000.00$
21 2502.601 IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVISION LS 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$
22 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATION LS 10,000.00$ 1 10,000.00$
23 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SF 8.00$ 1100 8,800.00$
24 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LF 28.00$ 9800 274,400.00$
25 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 90.00$ 1450 130,500.00$
26 2331.601 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 80.00$ 300 24,000.00$
27 2540.602 TEMPORARY MAIL BOX LS 10,000.00$ 1 10,000.00$
28 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$
29 2574.525 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW CY 50.00$ 600 30,000.00$
30 2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LF 7.00$ 500 3,500.00$
31 2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT EACH 3,000.00$ 2 6,000.00$
32 2573.55 EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR LS 5,000.00$ 1 5,000.00$
33 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN (INCL. SOIL PREP & FERT.) SY 12.00$ 6200 74,400.00$
34 2575.535 WATER (TURF ESTABLISHMENT) MGAL 75.00$ 350 26,250.00$
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 1,683,715.00$
CONTINGENCY 10% =168,371.50$
SUBTOTAL 1,852,086.50$
INDIRECT 18% =333,375.57$
SCHEDULE A - ESTIMATED COST 2,185,462.07$
OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST
SCHEDULE A - STREET IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL PROJECT
LINE
NO.
ITEM
NUMBER DESCRIPTION UNIT
ESTIMATED
UNIT PRICE
Page 61 of 111
35 2104.501 REMOVE WATER MAIN LF 10.00$ 3450 34,500.00$
36 2104.501 REMOVE WATER SERVICE PIPE LF 10.00$ 2020 20,200.00$
37 2104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 300.00$ 20 6,000.00$
38 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 600.00$ 9 5,400.00$
39 2104.509 REMOVE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 150.00$ 63 9,450.00$
40 2105.601 DEWATERING LS 25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$
41 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LS 25,000.00$ 1 25,000.00$
42 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 3,000.00$ 4 12,000.00$
43 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 450.00$ 63 28,350.00$
44 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 3,000.00$ 9 27,000.00$
45 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 4,000.00$ 9 36,000.00$
46 2504.602 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 6,000.00$ 6 36,000.00$
47 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 8,000.00$ 9 72,000.00$
48 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 500.00$ 63 31,500.00$
49 2504.602 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 750.00$ 63 47,250.00$
50 2504.603 1" COPPER SERVICE PIPE LF 60.00$ 2020 121,200.00$
51 2504.603 6" WATER MAIN - DIP CLASS 52 LF 80.00$ 105 8,400.00$
52 2504.603 8" WATER MAIN - DIP CLASS 52 LF 88.00$ 2130 187,440.00$
53 2504.603 12" WATER MAIN - DIP CLASS 52 LF 110.00$ 1450 159,500.00$
54 2504.620 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS - EPOXY COATED POUND 18.00$ 2200 39,600.00$
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 931,790.00$
CONTINGENCY 10% =93,179.00$
SUBTOTAL 1,024,969.00$
INDIRECT 18% =184,494.42$
SCHEDULE B - ESTIMATED COST 1,209,463.42$
55 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 1,100.00$ 21 23,100.00$
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 23,100.00$
CONTINGENCY 10% =2,310.00$
SUBTOTAL 25,410.00$
INDIRECT 18% =4,573.80$
SCHEDULE C - ESTIMATED COST 29,983.80$
56 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 600.00$ 13 7,800.00$
57 2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V LF 70.00$ 550 38,500.00$
58 2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III LF 80.00$ 239 19,120.00$
59 2503.541 21" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III LF 95.00$ 85 8,075.00$
60 2503.541 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III LF 105.00$ 293 30,765.00$
61 2503.541 27" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III LF 115.00$ 530 60,950.00$
62 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 2,000.00$ 2 4,000.00$
63 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 1,700.00$ 1 1,700.00$
64 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1,100.00$ 24 26,400.00$
65 2506.503 CONSTRUCT 48" STORM MANHOLE LF 700.00$ 44 30,800.00$
66 2506.503 CONSTRUCT 60" STORM MANHOLE LF 950.00$ 17 16,150.00$
67 2506.503 CONSTRUCT 72" STORM MANHOLE LF 1,250.00$ 6 7,500.00$
68 2506.503 CONSTRUCT 2'X3' CATCH BASIN LF 500.00$ 40 20,000.00$
69 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 1,100.00$ 4 4,400.00$
70 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEALS (EXTERNAL) EACH 350.00$ 25 8,750.00$
71 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 200.00$ 38 7,600.00$
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 292,510.00$
CONTINGENCY 10% =29,251.00$
SUBTOTAL 321,761.00$
INDIRECT 18% =57,916.98$
SCHEDULE D - ESTIMATED COST 379,677.98$
ESTIMATED TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 2,931,115.00$
CONTINGENCY 10% =293,111.50$
SUBTOTAL 3,224,226.50$
INDIRECT 18% =580,360.77$
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST 3,804,587.27$
SCHEDULE B - WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
SCHEDULE D - STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Page 62 of 111
City of Farmington – 2025 Street Improvements Project
4000383-00
City of Farmington – 2025 Street
Improvements Project
Feasibility Report
Appendix D
GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT
Page 63 of 111
Geotechnical Evaluation Report
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Sunnyside Drive, Fairview Lane, Centennial Drive, Centennial Court,
Sunnyside Circle
Farmington, Minnesota
Prepared for
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Kevin S. Zalec, PE
Senior Engineer
License Number: 47909
November 11, 2024
Project B2407927
Braun Intertec Corporation
Page 64 of 111
AA/EOE
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
November 11, 2024 Project B2407927
Eric Nelson, PE
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Re: Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Sunnyside Drive, Fairview Lane, Centennial Drive, Centennial Court, Sunnyside Circle
Farmington, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Nelson:
We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the Farmington 2025 Street
Improvements Project. The following report provides the results of our evaluation and should be read in
its entirety.
Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions
about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please
contact Jesse Hill-Male at 763.248.0148 (jhill-male@braunintertec.com), or Kevin Zalec at 952.995.2223
(kzalec@braunintertec.com).
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
Jesse O. Hill-Male, EIT
Staff Engineer
Kevin S. Zalec, PE
Senior Engineer
Page 65 of 111
Table of Contents
Description Page
A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1
A.2. Project Area Conditions and History ................................................................................... 2
A.3. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 2
A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 2
A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 3
B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 4
B.1. Geologic Overview .............................................................................................................. 4
B.2. Boring Results ...................................................................................................................... 4
B.3. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 6
B.4. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 6
C. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 7
C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ................................................................................... 7
C.1.a. Reuse of Pavement Materials ................................................................................ 7
C.1.b. Reuse of On-Site Soils ............................................................................................. 7
C.1.c. Groundwater Control ............................................................................................. 8
C.1.d. Construction Disturbance....................................................................................... 8
C.1.e. Disturbance of Existing Utility Lines ....................................................................... 8
C.2. Utilities ................................................................................................................................ 8
C.2.a. Subgrade Stabilization ............................................................................................ 8
C.2.b. Corrosion Potential ................................................................................................ 8
C.2.c. Excavation Oversizing ............................................................................................. 9
C.2.d. Excavated Slopes .................................................................................................... 9
C.2.e. Excavation Dewatering ........................................................................................... 9
C.2.f. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction ............................................................ 9
C.3. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation ............................................................................ 10
C.3.a. Removals .............................................................................................................. 10
C.3.b. Pavement Subgrade Preparation ......................................................................... 11
C.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Test Roll ............................................................................... 11
C.4. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 11
C.4.a. Recommended Minimum Pavement Sections ..................................................... 11
C.4.b. Aggregate Backfill ................................................................................................. 12
C.4.c. Bituminous Pavement Materials and Compaction .............................................. 13
C.4.d. Subgrade Drainage ............................................................................................... 13
D. Procedures...................................................................................................................................... 13
D.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 13
D.2. Exploration Logs ................................................................................................................ 13
D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................. 13
D.2.b. Geologic Origins ................................................................................................... 14
D.3. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 14
D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 14
D.3.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 14
D.4. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................................ 14
E. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 14
Page 66 of 111
Table of Contents (continued)
Description Page
E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 14
E.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 14
E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 15
E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 15
E.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 15
E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 15
E.3. Use of Report..................................................................................................................... 16
E.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 16
Appendix
Soil Boring Location Sketch
Log of Standard Penetration Test Borings ST-1 to ST-10
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
MnPAVE-Flexible Design Outputs
Page 67 of 111
A. Introduction
A.1. Project Description
This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the proposed design and reconstruction of various streets
within the city of Farmington. Streets included are Sunnyside Drive from CSAH 74 to Centennial Drive,
Fairview Lane from Sunnyside Drive to Park Drive, Centennial Drive from Fairview Lane to Sunnyside
Drive, Centennial Court, and Sunnyside Circle.
Figure 1 below shows an illustration of the proposed project area.
Figure 1. Project Area
Project area plan provided by Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated April 26, 2024.
Table 1 provides project details.
Page 68 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 2
Table 1. Project Details
Project Component Description Source
Pavement surface type(s) Bituminous Current pavements
Pavement loads 100,000 ESALs* Assumed
Grade changes Less than 1 foot Assumed based on proposed work
Utilities
Possible utility replacements or repairs
Assumed Maximum Utility Depth of
approximately 10 feet
Discussions with
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
*Equivalent 18,000-lb single axle loads based on 20-year design. See attachment to this report for calculation.
We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others reported
it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions based on our
experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, the
project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses
and/or recommendations.
A.2. Project Area Conditions and History
The proposed project area contains various bituminous-surfaced city streets with concrete curb and
gutter serving residential properties. Current grades range from approximately 905 1/2 feet at boring
location ST-3 to 908 1/2 at various boring locations. Generally, the site is slightly sloping downward from
south to north, and slopes vary from east to west.
A.3. Purpose
The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at
selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, ad provide geotechnical
recommendations for the design and reconstruction of the project area pavements.
A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents
We reviewed the following information:
▪ Plate 3, Surficial Geology, from the Dakota County Geologic Atlas prepared by the Minnesota
Geological Survey, dated 1990.
▪ Communications with Alliant Engineering Inc. (Alliant) regarding the proposed street
improvements.
Page 69 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 3
▪ Drawing of the proposed project area provided to us by Alliant and dated April 26, 2024.
In addition to the provided sources, we have used several publicly available sources of information such
as Google Earth™, MnTOPO, MnHAPO and the Minnesota County Well Index.
A.5. Scope of Services
We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal QTB199295 to
Alliant Engineering, Inc., dated July 1, 2024, and authorized on July 17, 2024. The following list describes
the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services.
▪ Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited.
▪ Obtaining a right-of-way permit with the City of Farmington prior to mobilizing our field
equipment.
▪ In consultation with Alliant Engineering Inc., we selected and staked the exploration
locations. We acquired the surface elevations and locations with GPS technology using the
State of Minnesota’s permanent GPS base station network. The Soil Boring Location Sketch
included in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the borings.
▪ Performing 10 standard penetration test (SPT) borings, denoted as ST-1 to ST-10, to a
nominal depth of 12 feet below existing grade.
▪ Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering
analysis.
▪ Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, logs of soil borings, a summary of
the soils encountered, results of laboratory tests, recommendations for pavement subgrade
preparation, and pavement section design (including an assumed R-value).
Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing and our geotechnical personnel
performing this evaluation are not trained to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide
environmental services or testing at your request.
Page 70 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 4
B. Results
B.1. Geologic Overview
Based on review of Plate 3, Surficial Geology from the Dakota County Geologic Atlas, the project area is
generally underlain by mixed glacial outwash deposits containing sand, loamy sand, and gravel. These
deposits are of the Des Moines Lobe, and in places, are distinguishable from the Superior Lobe outwash,
only by its shale content.
We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, laboratory testing, and available
common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional history,
geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain.
B.2. Boring Results
The table below summarizes the pavement material thicknesses encountered in each of the borings. The
aggregate base thicknesses should be considered approximate, as the transitions between the aggregate
base and underlying granular subgrade were sometimes difficult to discern. We did not perform gradation
analysis on the apparent aggregate base material encountered as part of the pavement section, in
accordance with our scope of work. Therefore, we cannot conclusively determine if the encountered
material satisfies a particular specification.
Table 2. Pavement Section Summary
Roadway Location
Bituminous Thickness
(inches)
Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness
(inches)
Sunnyside Drive
ST-1 6 10
ST-3 6 1/2 5
ST-4 6 7
Average1 6 7 1/4
Fairview Lane
ST-5 5 1/2 9
ST-6 5 1/2 7
ST-10 5 7
Average1 5 1/4 7 3/4
Centennial Drive
ST-7 5 1/2 5
ST-8 5 5
Average1 5 1/4 5
Page 71 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 5
Roadway Location
Bituminous Thickness
(inches)
Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness
(inches)
Sunnyside Circle ST-2 4 4
Centennial Court ST-9 7 3
Total Project Area Average1 5 1/2 6 1/4
1Average thicknesses have been rounded up to the nearest quarter-inch.
The table below provides a summary of the soil boring results from our investigation, in the general order
we encountered the strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details.
The Descriptive Terminology sheet in the Appendix includes definitions of abbreviations used in the table
below.
For simplicity, we define fill to mean existing, uncontrolled or undocumented fill.
Table 3. Subsurface Profile Summary
Strata
Soil/Rock Type -
ASTM Classification
Range of
N-Values Commentary and Details
Pavement
section --- ---
▪ See Table 2 above for results.
▪ Encountered at the surface of each of the boring locations.
▪ Bituminous thicknesses ranges from about 4 to 7 inches.
▪ Apparent aggregate base thicknesses range from about 3 to
10 inches.
Fill SP, SP-SM, SM, SC,
SC-SM, CL 4 to 11
▪ Encountered each boring beneath the pavement section.
▪ Encountered to depths ranging from 2 to 7 feet below the
existing ground surface.
▪ Variable soils throughout, often intermixed. Generally
consisted of SM, though included areas of both clayey and
sandy soils.
▪ Existing fill contained variable amounts of gravel.
▪ Moisture condition generally moist.
Glacial
outwash SP, SP-SM, SM 3 to 24
▪ Present beneath the fill in each boring.
▪ N-Values generally ranged from 7 to 14.
▪ Generally fine to medium-grained granular materials.
▪ Low N-values likely influenced by hydrostatic uplift near the
groundwater table.
▪ Generally brown or light brown in color.
▪ Variable amounts of gravel; may contain cobbles and
boulders.
▪ Moisture condition generally moist above the water table
and wet below.
Page 72 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 6
B.3. Groundwater
The table below summarizes the depths where we observed groundwater during drilling operations; the
attached Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix also include this information and additional details. Please
note, these measurements are based on a limited observation period and should be considered approximate.
Table 4. Groundwater Summary
Street Location
Ground
Surface Elevation
(feet)
Estimated Depth to
Groundwater
(feet)
Corresponding
Groundwater Elevation
(feet)
Sunnyside Drive ST-1 906 7 1/2 898 1/2
Sunnyside Circle ST-2 908 1/2 10 898 1/2
Sunnyside Drive
ST-3 905 1/2 7 898 1/2
ST-4 907 10 897
Fairview Lane
ST-5 906 7 899
ST-6 907 1/2 7 900 1/2
Centennial Drive
ST-7 908 1/2 10 898 1/2
ST-8 908 1/2 10 898 1/2
Centennial Court ST-9 908 1/2 10 898 1/2
Fairview Lane ST-10 908 1/2 10 898 1/2
At the time of our observation, the groundwater surface appeared to be generally between 7 and 10 feet
below existing grades, corresponding to elevations ranging from about 897 to 900 1/2 feet.
B.4. Laboratory Test Results
The boring logs in show the results of our laboratory testing we performed, next to the tested sample
depth. Tests were performed in general conformance with ASTM Standards. A summary of the tests
performed along with their results are listed below.
Table 5. Laboratory Test Summary
Laboratory Test Range of Results Comments
Moisture content (MC) tests, %
(per ASTM D2216)
Granular Soils: 3 to 15
Fine-Grained Soils: 22 to 24
Granular Soils: likely below or near
their optimum moisture contents
Fine-Grained Soils: likely at or above
their optimum moisture contents
Percent of particles passing the
#200 Sieve, %
(per ASTM D1140)
4 to 23 Classifications: SC, SP-SM, SM, SP
Page 73 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 7
C. Recommendations
C.1. Design and Construction Discussion
At the time of this report, the recommendations provided herein are based on the plans and information
provided to us. As the project progresses into final design, elements of the project may be adjusted and
as such, our recommendations should be revisited and may require revision. Additional geotechnical
investigation and analyses will be required as part of final design.
Unless otherwise specified, all references to the MnDOT Specification in this report refer to MnDOT’s
Standard Specification for Construction, 2020 edition.
C.1.a. Reuse of Pavement Materials
From a geotechnical standpoint, milling or reclamation of the bituminous pavement material for reuse as
recycled aggregate base or as a component to the new pavements is acceptable, assuming the products
meet the applicable project specifications, and these practices are acceptable to the project team.
Prior to reuse, the project should implement thorough quality control practices, including frequent sieve
analyses, asphalt contents and other tests, to achieve desirable characteristics for any reclaimed material
processed on site.
C.1.b. Reuse of On-Site Soils
Much of the existing fill and native soils encountered in the borings appear suitable for reuse within the
pavement subgrades. In areas where silty sand, poorly graded sand, or poorly graded sand with silt fill
materials are encountered, these materials can be reused within the roadway pavement section as long as
the material conforms to MnDOT Specification 3149.2.E. In Borings ST-1, ST-2, ST-9, and ST-10, clayey sand
or lean clay was encountered that we do not anticipate conforming to MnDOT Specification 3149.2.E. Due
to this we do not recommend re-using these materials in the pavement section, but they can be reused
within the subgrade fill, as long as the materials conform to MnDOT Specification 2106.1.B.1. Since the
clayey sand or lean clay materials were encountered near the surface and were underlain with poorly
graded sand with silt or poorly graded sand, the cohesionless sandy materials could be used within the
pavement section, while the clayey sand or lean clay can be used within the subgrade fill or as utility
trench backfill.
Soils with organic contents of greater than 5 percent by weight should not be reused as pavement
subgrade fill anywhere on the project. Organic soils can be stockpiled for use as a component in topsoil
dressing, side slopes or in other areas where loads are not supported. Any materials to be reused as
engineered fill should be tested and approved by the engineer prior to reuse.
Page 74 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 8
C.1.c. Groundwater Control
Groundwater is anticipated to be encountered in excavations. When groundwater is encountered, we
recommend removing the groundwater from the excavations to facilitate proper fill placement and
compaction of backfill.
Sumps and pumps would likely be suitable for short-term groundwater control in shallow excavations or
trenches near or slightly below groundwater levels or within excavations terminating in clayey soils. For
excavations further below observed groundwater levels or where sandy soils are encountered, the
excavations would likely require more extensive dewatering methods, such as well points, and the
contractor should provide a dewatering plan for review.
C.1.d. Construction Disturbance
The on-site, silty and clayey soils are highly susceptible to disturbance due to repeated construction
traffic. Disturbance of these soils may cause areas that were previously prepared, or that were suitable
for pavement or structure support, to become unstable and require moisture conditioning and
compaction. Subcutting and replacing the disturbed material with crushed, coarse gravel, free of fines is
also an alternative. The contractor should use means and methods to limit disturbance of the soils.
C.1.e. Disturbance of Existing Utility Lines
The project team should be aware of existing utilities such as water, phone, cable, fiber, electrical, and
gas withing the roadway area. Care should be used to avoid disturbance of the soils supporting these
existing utilities or impacting the utilities themselves during pavement removals, reconstruction,
excavation, and new utility installation.
C.2. Utilities
C.2.a. Subgrade Stabilization
For utilities, we anticipate the soils at typical invert elevations will be suitable for utility support. However,
if construction encounters unfavorable conditions such as soft clay, silt, organic soils or perched water at
invert grades, the unsuitable soils may require some additional subcutting and replacement with 12 inches
of sand or crushed rock to prepare a proper subgrade for pipe support. Project design and construction
should not place utilities within the 1H:1V oversizing of foundations.
C.2.b. Corrosion Potential
The soil borings indicated the site consists of a mixture of sandy, silty, and clayey soils. We consider the
granular soils non- to slightly corrosive to metallic conduits, while the fine-grained silts and clays are
moderately corrosive to metallic conduits. If utilities extend through clay soils, we recommend bedding
the utilities in sandy soil free of any clay lumps or constructing the utilities with non-corrosive materials.
Page 75 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 9
C.2.c. Excavation Oversizing
When removing unsuitable materials below utilities, we recommend the excavation extend outward and
downward at a slope of 1:1 V:H or flatter.
C.2.d. Excavated Slopes
Based on the borings, we anticipate on-site soils in excavations will consist primarily of fill and sandy
soils. These soils are typically considered Type C Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health
Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type C soils should have
a gradient no steeper than 1.5H:1V. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing.
OSHA requires an engineer to evaluate slopes or excavations over 20 feet in depth.
An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must
comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This
document states excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications
should reference these OSHA requirements.
C.2.e. Excavation Dewatering
We recommend removing groundwater from the excavations. Project planning should include temporary
sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays.
Sumps and pumps would likely be suitable for short-term groundwater control in shallow excavations or
trenches near or slightly below groundwater levels or within excavations terminating in clayey soils. For
excavations further below observed groundwater levels or where sandy soils are encountered, the
excavations would likely require more extensive dewatering methods, such as well points, and the
contractor should provide a dewatering plan for review.
C.2.f. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction
Table 6 contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials and compaction specifications. Note
that similar materials compared to existing should be used to the degree possible; importing different
soils for backfill may create lenses that could trap water and result in differential frost heave and other
performance issues. If longitudinal transitions in soil type are required, we recommend tapering them at
a rate of 1:20 V:H or flatter. Transitions in the transverse direction, such as at intersections, should be at
least 1:4 V:H.
Page 76 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 10
Table 6. Recommended Fill and Compaction Specifications
Material Material Specification Compaction Specification
Sand Subbase Aggregate Backfill
MnDOT 3149.2.E MnDOT 2106.3.G.1
Subgrade fill Select Grading Material
MnDOT 2106.1.B.1
Below landscaped surfaces, where
subsidence is not a concern
Non-Structural Grading Material
MnDOT 2106.1.B.8 MnDOT 2106.3.G.2
We recommend placing engineered fill in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2106. We recommend
compacting engineered fill in accordance with the MnDOT specifications listed in Table 7 above. The
project documents should specify relative compaction of engineered fill, based on the structure located
above the engineered fill, and vertical proximity to that structure.
The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to
place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under pavements during construction.
We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively
compacting the soil and meeting project requirements.
C.3. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation
C.3.a. Removals
We recommend removing unsuitable soils consisting of topsoil, vegetation, existing structures, soft clays,
pavements, and aggregate base from the pavement reconstruction areas and their associated oversize
areas. Based on the borings, typical removal depths will be about 1 1/2 to 2 feet. Soft clayey fill soils were
encountered at Boring ST-9 directly underneath the pavement section and extending to a depth of about
4 feet below the existing surface. To improve the long-term pavement performance in the area of the
boring, consideration can be given to performance of an additional subcut of 2 feet below the bottom of
the pavement section to remove the soft clayey fill soils. After subcutting the clayey soils and prior to
backfilling the pavement subgrade, we recommend having a geotechnical engineer or a technician working
under the direction of a geotechnical engineer (geotechnical representative) inspect the in-place clayey
soils, to determine if they are suitable for construction. Further subcuts may be necessary depending on
the subgrade conditions.
Page 77 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 11
C.3.b. Pavement Subgrade Preparation
We recommend the following steps for pavement subgrade preparation, understanding minimal grade
changes will occur within the existing roadway:
1. Once removals are performed as recommended in Section C.3.a, have a geotechnical
representative observe the excavated subgrade to evaluate if additional subgrade
improvements are necessary.
2. Scarify, moisture condition and surface compact the exposed subgrade.
3. Test roll the pavement subgrades prior to placement of fill or pavement materials as
described in Section C.3.c.
4. Correct any areas that yield or rut in excess of project requirements.
5. In accordance with Section C.2.f, place compacted fill to the bottom of the pavement section.
C.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Test Roll
After preparing the subgrade as described above and prior to the placement of the sand subbase or
aggregate base, we recommend test rolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We
also recommend having a geotechnical representative observe the test roll. Areas that fail the test roll
likely indicate soft or weak soils that will require additional correction work to support pavements.
The contractor should correct areas that fail to meet the test roll acceptance criteria. Possible options for
subgrade correction include moisture conditioning and recompaction, subcutting and replacement with
soil or crushed aggregate, and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second test roll after the
aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous pavement.
We recommend performing test rolls in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2111.
C.4. Pavements
C.4.a. Recommended Minimum Pavement Sections
Our scope of services for this project did not include laboratory tests on subgrade soils to determine the
R-value for pavement design. Given the predominantly silty sand soils anticipated at the pavement
subgrade elevation, we recommend pavement design assume an R-value of 30. Note the contractor may
need to perform removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to achieve this value as noted above.
Page 78 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 12
Based upon the assumed traffic loads and subgrade types, we recommend the new pavement section to
include the following materials and thicknesses per Table 7.
Table 7. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Section Thickness Design*
Layer
Thickness
(inches) Material Specification
Bituminous wear course 1 1/2 SPWEA330C
(MnDOT 2360)
Bituminous non-wear course 2 1/2 SPNWB330C
(MnDOT 2360)
Aggregate Base 8 Class 5
(MnDOT 3138)
Approved Subgrade 12 Aggregate Backfill
(MnDOT 3149.2.E)
*Matches the requirements of City of Farmington Residential Street Section (City Plate No. STR-05)
The above pavement design for hot mix asphalt (HMA) is based on a 20-year performance life. This is the
amount of time before major rehabilitation is anticipated. This performance life assumes maintenance
such as seal coating and crack sealing is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary depending
on variations in weather, traffic conditions, and maintenance.
It is common to place the non-wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For
this situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to
support construction traffic.
Many conditions affect the overall performance of the pavements. Some of these conditions include
the environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With regard to bituminous
pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of
placement and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular
maintenance plan for filling cracks in pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress
due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade.
C.4.b. Aggregate Backfill
As noted in Table 7 above, we recommend incorporating an aggregate backfill section within the
reconstructed roadways. The aggregate backfill section provides additional resistance to differential frost
heave, improved moisture properties compared to fine-grained soils, and will provide additional strength to
the pavement section. Use of an aggregate backfill section increases the reliability of the pavement section
to meet the design lifespan. We recommend the pavement design in the reconstructed roadway areas to
incorporate an aggregate backfill section consisting of material meeting MnDOT Specification 3149.2.E.
Page 79 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 13
C.4.c. Bituminous Pavement Materials and Compaction
We recommend placing the bituminous wear and non-wear courses to meet the requirements of MnDOT
Specification 2360. We recommend compacting the aggregate base to meet the requirements of MnDOT
Specification 2211.3.D.2.c (Penetration Index Method for the dynamic cone penetrometer [DCP]).
C.4.d. Subgrade Drainage
In conjunction with the City of Farmington Residential Street Section Standard Plate (City Plate No. STR-05),
we are including recommendations for a pavement design that incorporates an aggregate backfill section.
The aggregate backfill will increase constructability over subgrade soils susceptible to disturbance and, with
proper drainage will improve pavement performance by providing a more uniform subgrade and by
reducing the risk of frost heave. We recommend installing pavement edge drains consisting of perforated
drainpipes below the aggregate backfill and tied to the local storm sewer system. Note, we recommend
sloping subgrade soils to promote drainage and removal of accumulated water.
D. Procedures
D.1. Penetration Test Borings
We drilled the penetration test borings with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow-
stem auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test
samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals in general accordance with ASTM D1586.
D.2. Exploration Logs
D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets
The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and
describe the penetrated geologic materials and present the results of penetration resistance and other
tests performed. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test
samples, and groundwater measurements.
We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings.
Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The
boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as
gradual rather than abrupt transitions.
Page 80 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 14
D.2.b. Geologic Origins
We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report,
based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual
classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface
exploration, (3) penetration resistance testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and
(5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the
site and surrounding area in the past.
D.3. Material Classification and Testing
D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification
We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When
we performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in
accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used.
D.3.b. Laboratory Testing
The exploration logs in the Appendix note most of the results of the laboratory tests performed on
geologic material samples. The remaining laboratory test results follow the exploration logs. We
performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM or MnDOT Modified AASHTO procedures.
D.4. Groundwater Measurements
The drillers checked for groundwater while advancing the penetration test borings, and again after auger
withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes or allowed them to remain open for an extended period of
observation, as noted on the boring logs.
E. Qualifications
E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions
E.1.a. Material Strata
We developed our evaluation, analyses and recommendations from a limited amount of site and
subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from
exploration locations continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and
Page 81 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 15
thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning
should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation and thickness, away from the exploration locations.
Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until
performing additional exploration work, or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals
any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such
variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to
accommodate them.
E.1.b. Groundwater Levels
We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the
exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were
relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall,
flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal
and annual factors.
E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility
E.2.a. Plan Review
We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help
us develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the
designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design
correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and
specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations.
E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing
We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as
part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions
exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity
from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during
construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the
preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record
responsibilities.
Page 82 of 111
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Project B2407927
November 11, 2024
Page 16
E.3. Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no
responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may
not be appropriate for other parties or projects.
E.4. Standard of Care
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality.
No warranty, express or implied, is made.
Page 83 of 111
Appendix
Page 84 of 111
ST-1
ST-2
ST-3
ST-5
ST-4
ST-6
ST-7
ST-9
ST-8
ST-10
CENTENNIAL DRIVE
SU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
I
V
E
220TH STREET W.
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
L
A
N
E
PARK DRIVE
CH
I
P
P
E
N
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
CE
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
D
R
I
V
E
5T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
6T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
7T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
4T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
3R
D
S
T
R
E
E
T
HI
G
H
L
A
N
D
C
I
R
C
L
E
FAIRVIEW LANE
CE
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
C
I
R
C
L
E
SU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
I
V
E
F:
\
2
0
2
4
\
B
2
4
0
7
9
2
7
\
C
A
D
\
B
2
4
0
7
9
2
7
.
d
w
g
,
G
e
o
t
e
c
h
,
9
/
2
3
/
2
0
2
4
1
0
:
4
8
:
5
9
A
M
braunintertec.com
952.995.2000
Minneapolis, MN 55438
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Project No:
B2407927
Drawn By:
Date Drawn:
Checked By:
Last Modified: 9/23/24
Drawing No:
Project Information
Drawing Information
B2407927
JAG
8/28/24
KZ
Farmington 2025 Street
Improvements
Sunnyside Drive
Centennial Drive
Fairview Lane
Centennial Court
Farmington, Minnesota
Soil Boring
Location SketchN
DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING
0
SCALE:1"= 200'
200'100'
Pa
g
e
8
5
o
f
1
1
1
Elev./
Depth
ft
904.6
1.3
900.4
5.5
892.4
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 6 inches of bituminous over 10
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel,
brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, little Gravel, brown,
moist to wet, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL
OUTWASH)
Wet at 7 1/2 feet
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
2-4-5
(9)
12"
3-3-4
(7)
14"
3-3-3
(6)
12"
1-2-4
(6)
10"
3-4-7
(11)
12"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
10
Tests or Remarks
P200=22%
Water observed at 7.5 feet
while drilling.
Water observed at 9.0 feet
at end of drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-1
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:157755.4 EASTING:545950.8
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:905.9 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-1 page 1 of 1
Page 86 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
907.7
0.7
904.4
4.0
901.4
7.0
894.9
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 4 inches of bituminous over 4
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), brown, moist
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-
SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel,
brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, brown, moist to wet,
loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH)
Wet at 10 feet
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
1-2-5
(7)
10"
3-5-6
(11)
12"
4-5-7
(12)
14"
4-4-5
(9)
14"
3-5-6
(11)
12"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
22
6
Tests or Remarks
P200=11%
Water observed at 10.0 feet
while drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-2
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:157583.6 EASTING:545773.9
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:908.4 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-2 page 1 of 1
Page 87 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
904.7
1.0
898.7
7.0
892.2
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 6 1/2 inches of bituminous over 5
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, with Gravel, brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, little Gravel, brown,
wet, very loose to loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH)
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
2-3-4
(7)
12"
1-2-2
(4)
12"
2-1-2
(3)
14"
1-2-5
(7)
8"
2-4-5
(9)
18"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
8
Tests or Remarks
P200=18%
Water observed at 7.0 feet
while drilling.
Water observed at 9.5 feet
at end of drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-3
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:157321.0 EASTING:545981.8
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:905.7 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-3 page 1 of 1
Page 88 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
906.1
1.1
903.2
4.0
893.7
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 6 inches of bituminous over 7
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium-grained, light brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium-grained, light brown, moist to wet,
medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH)
Wet at 10 feet
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
1-4-5
(9)
12"
6-10-14
(24)
14"
5-6-9
(15)
14"
4-4-6
(10)
14"
1-4-5
(9)
14"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
5
Tests or Remarks
Water observed at 10.0 feet
while drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-4
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:157072.2 EASTING:546263.2
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:907.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-4 page 1 of 1
Page 89 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
905.0
1.2
902.2
4.0
892.7
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 5 1/2 inches of bituminous over 9
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-
SM), fine to medium-grained, brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown,
moist to wet, medium dense to loose (GLACIAL
OUTWASH)
Wet at 7 feet
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
1-2-3
(5)
10"
4-9-11
(20)
14"
4-7-8
(15)
12"
2-4-6
(10)
10"
1-4-5
(9)
12"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
3
Tests or Remarks
Water observed at 7.0 feet
while drilling.
Water observed at 9.0 feet
at end of drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-5
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:157236.1 EASTING:545785.0
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:906.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-5 page 1 of 1
Page 90 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
906.4
1.0
905.4
2.0
903.4
4.0
900.4
7.0
893.9
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 5 1/2 inches of bituminous over 7
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, little Gravel, brown,
moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH)
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine-grained,
light brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL
OUTWASH)
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium-grained, little Gravel, brown, wet, loose
(GLACIAL OUTWASH)
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
2-4-7
(11)
12"
4-6-8
(14)
14"
4-4-6
(10)
12"
4-4-4
(8)
12"
1-4-6
(10)
12"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
15
Tests or Remarks
P200=4%
Water observed at 7.0 feet
while drilling.
Water observed at 9.5 feet
at end of drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-6
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:156995.6 EASTING:545642.7
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:907.4 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-6 page 1 of 1
Page 91 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
907.5
0.9
902.9
5.5
899.4
9.0
894.9
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 5 1/2 inches of bituminous over 5
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium-grained, brown, moist, loose to
medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH)
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown,
moist to wet, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL
OUTWASH)
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
1-3-4
(7)
12"
2-2-3
(5)
12"
2-4-8
(12)
12"
4-4-7
(11)
14"
2-3-7
(10)
18"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
6
Tests or Remarks
P200=4%
Water observed at 10.0 feet
while drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-7
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:156777.4 EASTING:545774.6
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:908.4 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-7 page 1 of 1
Page 92 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
907.6
0.8
904.4
4.0
894.9
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 5 inches of bituminous over 5
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-
grained, brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, with Gravel, light
brown to brown, moist to wet, medium dense
(GLACIAL OUTWASH)
Wet at 10 feet
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
2-3-4
(7)
12"
2-5-6
(11)
12"
4-7-8
(15)
14"
3-4-6
(10)
12"
1-5-8
(13)
16"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
5
Tests or Remarks
Water observed at 10.0 feet
while drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-8
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:156772.1 EASTING:546170.4
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:908.4 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-8 page 1 of 1
Page 93 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
907.9
0.8
904.7
4.0
895.2
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 7 inches of bituminous over 3
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: LEAN CLAY (CL), brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, little Gravel, light
brown to brown, moist to wet, loose to medium
dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH)
Wet at 10 feet
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
1-2-2
(4)
10"
2-3-7
(10)
12"
9-11-11
(22)
12"
4-8-9
(17)
14"
2-5-8
(13)
16"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
24
Tests or Remarks
Water observed at 10.0 feet
while drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-9
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:156843.9 EASTING:545956.7
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:908.7 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-9 page 1 of 1
Page 94 of 111
Elev./
Depth
ft
907.6
1.0
904.6
4.0
899.6
9.0
895.1
13.5
Wat
e
r
Le
v
e
l
Description of Materials
(Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM
1110-1-2908)
PAVEMENT, 5 inches of bituminous over 7
inches of apparent aggregate base
FILL: SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), fine to
medium-grained, mix of Clayey Sand and Silty
Sand, brown, moist
POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to
medium-grained, little Gravel, light brown,
moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL
OUTWASH)
POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM),
fine to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown,
moist to wet, medium dense to loose (GLACIAL
OUTWASH)
Wet at 10 feet
END OF BORING
Boring immediately backfilled
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sa
m
p
l
e
Blows
(N-Value)
Recovery
2-5-5
(10)
12"
3-3-3
(6)
14"
4-6-7
(13)
14"
3-6-8
(14)
12"
2-3-5
(8)
12"
qₚ
tsf
MC
%
9
6
Tests or Remarks
P200=23%
Water observed at 10.0 feet
while drilling.
LOG OF BORING
See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations
Project Number B2407927
Geotechnical Evaluation
Farmington 2025 Street Improvements
Multiple Locations
Farmington, Minnesota
BORING:ST-10
LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS.
DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet)
NORTHING:156588.6 EASTING:545645.0
DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:K. Zalec START DATE:09/06/24 END DATE:09/06/24
SURFACE
ELEVATION:908.6 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear
B2407927 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:11/11/2024 ST-10 page 1 of 1
Page 95 of 111
Descriptive Terminology of Soil
Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488
(Unified Soil Classification System)
Group
Symbol Group NameB
Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well‐graded gravelE
Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE
Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G
Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G
Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well‐graded sandI
Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI
Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I
Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I
CL Lean clayK L M
PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M
Organic OL
CH Fat clayK L M
MH Elastic siltK L M
Organic OH
PT Peat Highly Organic Soils
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit less than
50)
Silts and Clays
(Liquid limit 50 or
more)
Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor
Inorganic
Inorganic
PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ
PI plots on or above "A" line
PI plots below "A" line
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and
Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA
Soil Classification
Co
a
r
s
e
‐gr
a
i
n
e
d
So
i
l
s
(m
o
r
e
th
a
n
50
%
re
t
a
i
n
e
d
on
No
.
20
0
si
e
v
e
)
Fi
n
e
‐gr
a
i
n
e
d
So
i
l
s
(5
0
%
or
mo
r
e
pa
s
s
e
s
th
e
No
.
20
0
si
e
v
e
)
Sands
(50% or more coarse
fraction passes No. 4
sieve)
Clean Gravels
(Less than 5% finesC)
Gravels with Fines
(More than 12% finesC)
Clean Sands
(Less than 5% finesH)
Sands with Fines
(More than 12% finesH)
Gravels
(More than 50% of
coarse fraction
retained on No. 4
sieve)
Liquid Limit − oven dried
Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N
Organic silt K L M O
Liquid Limit − oven dried
Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P
Organic silt K L M Q
ParticleSize Identification
Boulders.............. over 12"
Cobbles................ 3" to 12"
Gravel
Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm)
Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm)
Sand
Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm)
Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm)
Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm)
Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm
Clay...................... < .005 mm
Relative ProportionsL, M
trace............................. 0 to 5%
little.............................. 6 to 14%
with.............................. ≥ 15%
Inclusion Thicknesses
lens............................... 0 to 1/8"
seam............................. 1/8" to 1"
layer.............................. over 1"
Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils
Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF
Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF
Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF
Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF
Very dense.................... over 50 BPF
A. Based on the material passing the 3‐inch (75‐mm) sieve.
B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders,
or both" to group name.
C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
GW‐GM well‐graded gravel with silt
GW‐GC well‐graded gravel with clay
GP‐GM poorly graded gravel with silt
GP‐GC poorly graded gravel with clay
D. Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2 / ሺ𝐷10 𝑥 𝐷60)
E. If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name.
F. If fines classify as CL‐ML, use dual symbol GC‐GM or SC‐SM.
G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name.
H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols:
SW‐SM well‐graded sand with silt
SW‐SC well‐graded sand with clay
SP‐SM poorly graded sand with silt
SP‐SC poorly graded sand with clay
I. If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name.
J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL‐ML, silty clay.
K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is
predominant.
L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name.
M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name.
N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line.
O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line.
P. PI plots on or above “A” line.
Q. PI plots below “A” line.
Laboratory Tests
DD Dry density,pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf
WD Wet density, pcf qU Unconfined compression test, tsf
P200 % Passing #200 sieve LL Liquid limit
MC Moisture content, %PL Plastic limit
OC Organic content, %PI Plasticity index
Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined
Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength
Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 0.25 tsf
Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 0.25 to 0.5 tsf
Medium.................... 5to 8 BPF .................. 0.5 to 1 tsf
Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf
Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf
Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf
Drilling Notes:
Blows/N‐value: Blows indicatethe driving resistance recorded
for each 6‐inch interval. The reported N‐value is the blows per
foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in
accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586.
PartialPenetration:If the sampler could not be driven
through a full 6‐inch interval, the number of blows for that
partial penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N‐value is
reported as "REF" indicating refusal.
Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the
sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery
is 18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelby tube sample.
WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of
hammer and rods alone; driving not required.
WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of
rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required.
Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the
drillers either while drilling ( ), at the end of drilling ( ),
or at some time after drilling ( ).
Moisture Content:
Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch.
Moist: Damp but no visible water.
Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table.
5/2021 Page 96 of 111
MnPAVE Design Summary
MnPAVE 6.502 Simulation Input File: B2407927 - Farmington Standard Plate
Confidence Level for Preliminary Life Estimate = 70%
Confidence and Reliability may not agree. Thickness and modulus are reduced when Confidence > 50%.
Monte Carlo Reliability randomly selects values for each layer. Use Reliability for final design.
Preliminary Life Estimate 20-Year Reliability (5,000 cycles)
Fatigue FatigueRutting Rutting
>50 years >50 years 100%100%
Project Information
District County City
Metro Dakota Farmington, Minnesota
Project Number Route Reference Post
B2407927 from to
Letting Date Construction Type
09/23/24 Reconstruction
Designer Soils Engineer
Alliant Engineering, Inc.Braun Intertec
Climate Information
Seasons Location
5 44˚ 39’ Latitude, 93˚ 3’ Longitude
Structural Information (Design Level: Intermediate)
Layer Type Subtype Height (in.)
1a Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%)PG58-34 (2360F 1/2")1.50
1b Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%)PG58-28 (2360F 1/2")2.50
2 Aggregate Base MnDOT Class 5 8.00
3 Aggregate Subbase MnDOT Select Granular 12.00
4 Undisturbed Soil Unified SM
Traffic Information (Speed = 30 mph)
Load Type First Year ESAL Growth Rate Axle Repetitions
ESAL 4,773 0.5% (simple)100,000
Notes
The Minnesota Department of Transportation makes no guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided
herewith, regardless of its format or means of its transmission. The user accepts the data "as is", and assumes all risks associated with its use. By
accepting this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user shall include with
the data a copy of this disclaimer. The Minnesota Department of Transportation assumes no responsibility, actual or consequential, for damage that
results from any user’s reliance on this data.
Printed Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 13:48:19
Page 97 of 111
224345v1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made this 3rd day of February,
2025, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation, whose
business address is 430 3rd St, Farmington, MN 55024 (hereinafter "City") and Alliant
Engineering, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, whose business address is 733 Marquette Avenue,
Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 (hereinafter "Engineer").
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide
a variety of professional services for City projects. That policy requires that persons, firms or
corporations providing such services enter into written agreements with the City. The purpose of
this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of professional services
by Engineer for engineering services, hereinafter referred to as the "Work", and as outlined on
Exhibit “A” attached hereto.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES
AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Engineer to furnish the services set
forth on the attached Exhibit “A”. The Engineer agrees to perform the services. Engineer shall
provide all personnel, supervision, services, materials, tools, equipment and supplies and do all
things necessary and ancillary thereto specified on Exhibit “A”. The Work to be performed under
this Agreement shall be done under the review of a professional engineer licensed in the State of
Minnesota, who shall attest that the Work will be performed in compliance with all applicable
codes and engineering standards. The Work shall be performed in accordance with the Contract
Documents, which includes this Agreement and the attached Exhibits: Exhibit “A” – Scope of
Services, Exhibit “B” – Schedule of Payment and Fee Schedule. In the event any ambiguity or
conflict between the Contract Documents listed above, the order of precedence shall be the
following order: (i) this Agreement; (ii) Exhibit “A”, (iii) Exhibit “B”.
2. REPRESENTATIVES. City has designated John Powell, Public Works
Director/City Engineer (the “City Representative”), and the Engineer has designated Eric Nelson,
Client Services Manager (the “Engineer Representative”). The City Representative and the
Engineer Representative shall be available as often as is reasonably necessary for reviewing the
Services and Work to be performed.
3. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES. Engineer shall be paid by the City for the
services described in Exhibit “A” on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached fee schedule,
Exhibit “B”, but not to exceed $35,970 inclusive of taxes and reimbursable costs.
A. Any changes in the scope of the Work which may result in an increase to the
compensation due the Engineer shall require prior written approval by the
Page 98 of 111
224345v1
authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay
additional compensation for services that do not have prior written authorization.
B. Special Consultants may be utilized by the Engineer when required by the complex
or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City.
4. COMPLETION DATE/TERM. The Engineer must complete the Services by
April 30, 2025. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties
for such additional period as they deem appropriate, and upon the terms and conditions as herein
stated.
5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports and
information generated in connection with the performance of the Agreement (“Information”) shall
become the property of the City, but Engineer may retain copies of such documents as records of
the services provided. The City may use the Information for its purposes and the Engineer also
may use the Information for its purposes. Use of the Information for the purposes of the project
contemplated by this Agreement does not relieve any liability on the part of the Engineer, but any
use of the Information by the City or the Engineer beyond the scope of the Project is without
liability to the other, and the party using the Information agrees to defend and indemnify the other
from any claims or liability resulting therefrom.
6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services
hereunder, Engineer shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the
provisions of services to be provided. Any violation of statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations
pertaining to the Services to be provided shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and
entitle the City to immediately terminate this Agreement. Engineer’s books, records, documents,
and accounting procedures and practices related to services provided to the City are subject to
examination by the legislative auditor or the state auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six
years.
7. STANDARD OF CARE. Engineer shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill,
and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a
professional engineer under similar circumstances. Engineer shall be liable to the fullest extent
permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss, or damages proximately
caused by Engineer’s breach of this standard of care. Engineer shall put forth reasonable efforts
to complete its duties in a timely manner. Engineer shall not be responsible for delays caused by
factors beyond its control or that could not be reasonably foreseen at the time of execution of this
Agreement. Engineer shall be responsible for costs, delays, or damages arising from unreasonable
delays in the performance of its duties. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in
this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of
Engineer’s services.
8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Engineer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless
the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all judgments, claims, damages,
demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees paid or incurred resulting
from any breach of this Agreement by Engineer, its agents, contractors and employees, or any
Page 99 of 111
224345v1
negligent or intentional act or omission performed, taken or not performed or taken by Engineer,
its agents, contractors and employees, relative to this Agreement. City will indemnify and hold
Engineer harmless from and against any loss for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent
acts of the City, its officers, agents, or employees.
9. INSURANCE.
a. General Liability. Prior to starting the Work, Engineer shall procure,
maintain, and pay for such insurance as will protect against claims or loss
which may arise out of operations by Engineer or by any subcontractor or
by anyone employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of
them may be liable. Such insurance shall include, but not be limited to,
minimum coverages and limits of liability specified in this Paragraph, or
required by law.
b. Engineer shall procure and maintain the following minimum insurance
coverages and limits of liability for the Work:
Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits
Employer’s Liability $500,000 each accident
$500,000 disease policy limit
$500,000 disease each employee
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 property damage and bodily
injury per occurrence
$2,000,000 general aggregate
Comprehensive Automobile
Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit each
accident (shall include coverage for all
owned, hired and non-owed vehicles.)
Commercial General Liability requirements may be met through a combination of
umbrella or excess liability insurance.
The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and
umbrella policies.
c. Professional Liability Insurance. In addition to the coverages listed above,
Engineer shall maintain a professional liability insurance policy in the amount of
$2,000,000. Said policy need not name the City as an additional insured.
Page 100 of 111
224345v1
d. Engineer shall maintain “stop gap” coverage if Engineer obtains Workers’
Compensation coverage from any state fund if Employer’s liability coverage is not
available.
e. All policies, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, Automobile Policy, and
Professional Liability Policy, shall name the “City of Farmington” as an additional
insured.
f. All policies, except the Professional Liability Policy, shall apply on a “per project”
basis.
g. All polices shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City.
h. All policies, except for the Worker’s Compensation Policy and the Professional
Liability Policy, shall be primary and non-contributory.
i. All polices, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, shall insure the defense and
indemnity obligations assumed by Engineer under this Agreement.
j. Engineer agrees to maintain all coverage required herein throughout the term of the
Agreement and for a minimum of two (2) years following City’s written acceptance
of the Work.
k. It shall be Engineer’s responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the
coverages required herein.
l. The Engineer’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that
coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty
(30) days advanced written notice to the City.
m. Engineer shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required under this
Paragraph at Engineer’s sole expense and with insurance companies licensed to do
business in the state in Minnesota and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less
than A-, unless specifically accepted by City in writing and all insurance policies
shall be on ISO forms acceptable to the City.
n. A copy of the Engineer’s Certificate of Insurance which evidences the
compliance with this Paragraph, must be filed with City prior to the start of
Engineer’s Work. Upon request a copy of the Engineer’s insurance declaration
page, rider and/or endorsement, as applicable shall be provided. Such documents
evidencing insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide
satisfactory evidence that Engineer has complied with all insurance requirements.
Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of
the required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such Certificate
of Insurance, declaration page, rider, endorsement, certificates, or other evidence
of insurance, or to advise Engineer of any deficiencies in such documents and
Page 101 of 111
224345v1
receipt thereof shall not relieve Engineer from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City’s
right to enforce the terms of Engineer’s obligations hereunder. City reserves the
right to examine any policy provided for under this Agreement.
o. Effect of Engineer’s Failure to Provide Insurance. If Engineer fails to provide the
specified insurance, then Engineer will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
City, the City's officials, agents, and employees from any loss, claim, liability, and
expense (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation) to the
extent necessary to afford the same protection as would have been provided by the
specified insurance. Except to the extent prohibited by law, this indemnity applies
regardless of any strict liability or negligence attributable to the City (including sole
negligence) and regardless of the extent to which the underlying occurrence (i.e.,
the event giving rise to a claim which would have been covered by the specified
insurance) is attributable to the negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission
(including breach of contract) of Engineer, its subcontractors, agents, employees or
delegates. Engineer agrees that this indemnity shall be construed and applied in
favor of indemnification. Engineer also agrees that if applicable law limits or
precludes any aspect of this indemnity, then the indemnity will be considered
limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The stated
indemnity continues until all applicable statutes of limitation have run.
If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity in section o, the City may require
Engineer to:
i. Furnish and pay for a surety bond, satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing
performance of the indemnity obligation; or
ii. Furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from Engineer's
insurance company.
Engineer will take the action required by the City within fifteen (15) days of receiving
notice from the City.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Engineer as an
independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Engineer
is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein.
Engineer shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work.
Engineer shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Engineer's
performance under this Agreement. City and Engineer agree that Engineer shall not at any time
or in any manner represent that Engineer or any of Engineer's agents or employees are in any
manner agents or employees of the City. Engineer shall be exclusively responsible under this
Agreement for Engineer's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment
compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such
payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation.
11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Engineer shall not enter into subcontracts for services
provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Engineer shall
comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Engineer must pay subcontractor for all undisputed
Page 102 of 111
224345v1
services provided by subcontractor within ten (10) days of Engineer’s receipt of payment from
City. Engineer must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor
on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest
penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10.
12. ASSIGNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES. Neither party shall assign this
Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. Nothing
under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone
other than the City and Engineer, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this
Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City and Engineer and not for the
benefit of any other party.
13. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this
Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement.
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein.
This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the
subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the
provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the
parties, unless otherwise provided herein.
15. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. All proceedings related to
this contract shall be venued in the Dakota County District Court.
16. COPYRIGHT. Engineer shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of
any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings, or specifications
supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom.
17. RECORDS. The Engineer shall maintain complete and accurate records of time
and expense involved in the performance of services.
18. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Engineer must
comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it
applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created,
collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Engineer pursuant to this
Agreement. Engineer is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices
Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it
were a government entity. In the event Engineer receives a request to release data, Engineer must
immediately notify City. City will give Engineer instructions concerning the release of the data to
the requesting party before the data is released. Engineer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold
City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting
from Engineer’s officers’, agents’, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’, or
subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall
survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement.
Page 103 of 111
224345v1
19. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by City on thirty (30) days’
written notice delivered to Engineer at the address on file with the City. Upon termination under
this provision if there is no fault of the Engineer, the Engineer shall be paid for services rendered
and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If the City terminates the
Agreement because the Engineer has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no
further payment shall be made to the Engineer, and the City may retain another engineer to
undertake or complete the work identified in Paragraph 1.
20. NON-DISCRIMINATION. During the performance of this Agreement, the
Engineer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of
race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public
assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age. The Engineer shall post in places available to
employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non-
discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for
employment. The Engineer shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all
of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to
incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. The Engineer further agrees
to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes 363.01, et.
seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
21. SURVIVAL. All express representations, waivers, indemnifications, and
limitations of liability included in this Agreement will survive its completion or termination for
any reason.
22. SERVICES NOT PROVIDED FOR. Claims for services furnished by the
Engineer not specifically provided for herein shall not be honored by the City.
23. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion
hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such
decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Agreement.
24. CONFLICTS. No officer or salaried employee of the City and no member of the
Council of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement. The
violation of this provision renders the Agreement void.
25. NOTICES. Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed
to the appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally, by facsimile, by
registered or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial courier service. All notices shall
be effective upon the date of receipt.
26. WAIVER. A party’s non-enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a
waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder
of this Agreement.
Page 104 of 111
224345v1
27. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each of which shall be considered an original.
Dated: February 3, 2025 CITY: CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Joshua Hoyt
Mayor
By:
Shirley R Buecksler
City Clerk
Dated:__________________, 20___ ENGINEER: ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.
By:
_____________________________ [print name]
Its
__________________________ [title]
Page 105 of 111
224345v1
EXHIBIT “A”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
AND
EXHIBIT “B”
SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT AND FEE SCHEDULE
Page 106 of 111
Proposal for 2025 Street Improvements – Final Design // 1
RE: Proposal for 2025 Street Improvements – Final Design
Dear Mr. Powell:
Alliant Engineering has appreciated the opportunity to provide the City of
Farmington with a feasibility study and preliminary design services for
your 2025 Street Improvements Project. Based on the information you
have provided and our previous discussions, we have prepared the
following scope of services to provide final design and bidding
assistance for the project. The sections below describe each major task
along with key assumptions, information or participation needed from
the city, and major deliverables. A detailed spreadsheet documenting
the hours and fee associated with each task is also included with this
letter.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Eric Nelson will continue to be the Project Manager for the Alliant Team and will serve as the single point of
contact for the city. Eric will prepare monthly progress reports and invoices for review and approval by the city.
Throughout the design process, Eric will conduct meetings with the city project manager as needed to provide
status updates and review design decisions needed.
CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES:
● Participate in check in meetings.
CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES:
● Monthly progress reports and invoices
Design Fee: $2,400.00
TASK 2 – FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
Alliant will advance the preliminary design completed under the previous phase through final design and
preparation of construction documents. The plans will include the street reconstruction, storm sewer additions,
and replacement of all watermain within the project area as directed by the city. Draft plans and a cost estimate
will be provided at the 60% complete level. Following incorporation of city review comments, we will provide
plans, specifications, and an updated cost estimate at the 90% complete level. Final city comments will be
addressed and 100% complete plans and an accompanying Project Manual for contractor bidding will be
prepared.
CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES:
● Review and comment on draft submittals.
CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES:
● 60% draft plans and cost estimate
● 90% draft plans, specifications, and cost estimate
● 100% complete plans, Project Manual, and final Engineer’s Estimate
January 15, 2025
John Powell, PE
Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Farmington
430 Third Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612.758.3080
www.alliant-inc.com
Page 107 of 111
Proposal for 2025 Street Improvements – Final Design // 2
Design Fee: $23,680.00
TASK 3 – PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
As discussed with the city, we will plan on one additional open house ahead of construction once bids are
opened and a contractor is secured. This open house will answer questions on construction schedule, property
access, and any other resident concerns before construction begins. The open house will follow the same format
as previous open houses.
CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES:
● Review and comment on draft mailer and open house materials.
● Attend open house meetings with Alliant staff.
CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES:
● Draft and final mailer for open house meeting
● Draft and final printed open house material
● Meeting Summary Document
Design Fee: $3,620.00
TASK 4 – UTILITY COORDINATION
We will distribute draft plans to private utility operators within the project area and conduct one utility
coordination meeting (via Microsoft Teams).
CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES:
● Attend utility coordination meeting.
CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES:
● Utility Coordination Meeting agenda and minutes
Design Fee: $940.00
TASK 5 – PERMITTING AND APPROVALS
Alliant will assist the City in obtaining the required permits for stormwater and watermain replacements included
in the project.
CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES:
● Review and sign permit applications as needed.
CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES:
● Permit application forms and supporting documentation for NPDES (stormwater) and Minnesota Department
of Health (watermain).
● Permit fees (listed as reimbursable expense in fee estimate).
Design Fee: $940.00
Page 108 of 111
Proposal for 2025 Street Improvements – Final Design // 3
TASK 6 – BIDDING ASSISTANCE
Following final approval of the construction documents, we will facilitate the online bidding process through
QuestCDN. Our team will post bidding documents, respond to contractor inquiries, and issue
clarifications/addenda as needed, and conduct the online bid opening. Bids will be received online and reviewed
at a public bid opening at Farmington City Hall. Following the bid opening, we will provide a Bid Abstract and any
other supporting documentation needed for the City to award a construction contract.
CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES:
● Review draft Advertisement for Bids.
● Secure a conference room for bid opening.
CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES:
● Draft and final Advertisement for Bids
● Bid Abstract
Design Fee: $3,090.00
Subtotal of Design
Fees
$34,670
Reimbursable
Expenses
$1,300
Total Project Fee $35,970
SCHEDULE
The following is an estimate of our schedule based on our discussion of required milestones:
● Notice to Proceed — February 4, 2025
● Submit 60% Draft Plans – February 7, 2025
● Submit 90% Draft Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimate – February 21, 2025
● City Council authorize bids – March 3, 2025
● 100% Construction Documents complete – March 7, 2025
● Advertisement for Bids – March 14, 2025
● Bid Opening – April 2, 2025
● City Council award construction contract – April 7, 2025
● Pre-construction Open House – May 2025
KEY STAFF
The Alliant design team will consist of the following individuals, in continuation from our work on the feasibility
study and preliminary design:
● Eric Nelson, PE — Project Manager
● Cole Adams — Design Lead
Page 109 of 111
Proposal for 2025 Street Improvements – Final Design // 4
We again thank you for the opportunity to work with the city on this project and are ready and eager to get started.
If you have any questions about this scope and fee or want to discuss in further detail, please contact me at the
email address or phone number listed on the following page.
Sincerely,
Alliant Engineering, Inc.
Eric Nelson, PE
Project Manager
EMAIL enelson@alliant-inc.com
DIRECT 612.767.9380
Building better communities with excellence and passion
Page 110 of 111
Alliant Engineering
City of Farmington 2025 Street Improvements Project - Final Design
Hours and Fee Estimate
Principal
Graduate
Engineer II
Graphics/
Admin
Nelson Adams
1.0 Project Management 10 0 0 10 $2,400.00
1.1 Routine project management 4 4 $960.00
1.2 Monthly invoices and progress reports 3 3 $720.00
1.3 Update meetings (1) 3 3 $720.00
2.0 Final Design and Construction Documents 22 160 0 182 $23,680.00
4.1 Roadway and driveway design
4 40 44 $5,560.00
4.2 City utilities (2)
2 40 42 $5,080.00
4.3 60% and 90% draft submittals
4 64 68 $8,320.00
4.4 Final construction documents
12 16 28 $4,720.00
3.0 Public Engagement 6 12 8 26 $3,620.00
3.1 Pre-construction open house meeting 6 12 8 26 $3,620.00
4.0 Utility coordination 2 4 0 6 $940.00
4.1 Distribute plans to private utilities 2 2 $230.00
4.2 Utility Coordination Meeting (3) 2 2 4 $710.00
5.0 Permitting and Approvals 2 4 0 6 $940.00
5.1 Obtain NPDES and MPCA permits 2 4 6 $940.00
6.0 Bidding Assistance 10 6 0 16 $3,090.00
6.1 Post documents to QuestCDN for online bidding 4 4 $960.00
6.2 Respond to contractor questions, prepare clarifications/addenda 2 4 6 $940.00
6.3 Bid opening meeting (4) 2 2 $480.00
6.4 Compile Bid Abstract and supporting contract information 2 2 4 $710.00
PROJECT TOTAL HOURS 52 186 8 246
Hourly Billing Rates 240.00$ 115.00$ 100.00$
DIRECT LABOR $12,480 $21,390 $800 $34,670
SUBTOTAL LABOR COST 34,670.00
Direct Expenses:
Printing fees and postage for open house materials $300.00
Permit fees $1,000.00
SUBTOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $1,300.00
PROJECT COST NOT TO EXCEED
Notes:
(1) Assumes 3 meetings, 1 hour each (including prep time) with City Project Manager on Microsoft Teams.
(2) Includes watermain replacement and storm sewer additions identified in previous phase.
(3) Assumes one utility coordination meeting on Microsoft Teams with agendas and minutes.
$35,970.00
Task Description
Hours
TASK
TOTAL
COST
Alliant Engineering
TEAM
TOTAL
Page 111 of 111