HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.17.03 Council Packet
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mission Statement
Through teamwork and cooperation,
the City of Farmington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
foster a promising future.
AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 17, 2003
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVE AGENDA
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS
a) Proclaim Space Day - May 1, ~003
~. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open/or Audience Comments)
7. CONSENT AGENDA
a) Approve Council Minutes (3/3/03 Regular)
b) Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes - Parks and Recreation
c) Appointment Recommendation - Fire Department
d) Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License St. Michael's Church -
Administration
e) Adopt Resolution - Gambling Event Permit Dakota County Ducks Unlimited
- Administration
f) Adopt Resolution - Gambling Event Permit Rotary Club - Administration
g) Adopt Agreement - Dakota County Fair Board - Finance
h) Approve Change Order Facilities Project - Engineering
i) 2002 Recycling Survey - Parks and Recreation
j) Approve Bid Solid Waste Truck - Parks and Recreation
k) Approve Bills
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Adopt Resolution - Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement Glenview
Commercial Addition - Community Development
9. AWARDOFCONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Adopt Resolution - Glenview Commercial Addition Preliminary and Final
Plat - Community Development
Action Taken
Page 432
Pages 433-439
Pages 440-442
Page 443
Page 444
Pages 445-446
Pages 447-448
Pages 449-454
Pages 455-457
Pages 458-468
Pages 469-470
Page 471
Pages 472-475
Pages 476-482
b) Approve Tower View Apartment Building Rezoning - Community
Development
c) Adopt Ordinance - Establishing Standards for Fireworks - Community
Development
d) Schedule City Hall Task Force Workshop - Administration
Pages 483-484
Pages 485-494
Page 495
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCILROUNDTABLE
14. ADJOURN
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Mission Statement
Through teamwork and cooperation.
the City of Farmington provides quality
services that preserve our proud past and
foster a promising future.
AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 17, 2003
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVE AGENDA
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS
a) Proclaim Space Day - May I, 2003
I. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Open for Audience Comments)
7. CONSENT AGENDA
a) Approve Council Minutes (3/3/03 Regular)
b) Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes - Parks and Recreation
c) Appointment Recommendation - Fire Department
d) Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License St. Michael's Church -
Administration
e) Adopt Resolution - Gambling Event Permit Dakota County Ducks Unlimited
- Administration
f) Adopt Resolution - Gambling Event Permit Rotary Club - Administration
g) Adopt Agreement - Dakota County Fair Board - Finance
h) Approve Change Order Facilities Project - Engineering
i) 2002 Recycling Survey - Parks and Recreation
j) Approve Bid Solid Waste Truck - Parks and Recreation
k) Approve Bills
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Adopt Resolution - Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement Glenview
Commercial Addition - Community Development
1. AWARDOFCONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) Adopt Resolution - Glenview Commercial Addition Preliminary and Final
Plat - Community Development
Action Taken
Proclaimed
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
RJ 4-03
RJ 5-03
Adopted
Approved
Information Received
Approved
Approved
RJ7-03
RJ 8-03
b) Approve Tower View Apartment Building Rezoning - Community
Development
c) Adopt Ordinance - Establishing Standards for Fireworks - Community
Development
d) Schedule City Hall Task Force Workshop - Administration
Approved
Ord 003...487
April 30,2003
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
14. ADJOURN
Sa-
Mayoral Proclamation
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
CITY OF FARMINGTON MINNESOTA PROCLAMATION
SPACE DAY MAY 1,2003
Space Day is the culminating event of the year-round Embrace Space
educational initiative, celebrating the extraordinary achievements,
benefits and opportunities in the exploration and use of space; and
Space Day encourages people of all ages from around the globe to
advance science, math and technology education, and to inspire future
generations to continue the vision of our space pioneers; and
Space Day is an exciting time for all mankind as we stand at the
threshold of a new age of space science and exploration, where the
vision of our forefathers will become a reality through the hopes and
dreams of our young people; and
the Embrace Space initiative is supported by more than 60 Partners
representing a broad cross-section of educational, professional and
trade associations, youth groups, corporations and space-related
organizations; and
the City of Farmington will join with other organizations in celebrating
Space Day through educating and communicating the excitement and
importance of space in our lives;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jerry Ristow, Mayor, do herebyproc1aim May 1, 2003 as
SPACE DAY in the City of Farmington.
..,.......,....'.,s.......,....P
<h,'I'-"':",,:.
,l '~:',','./, <7""'~"'" ,c." ';':/<.>"
'.>'\ ~
;:;J. ,;..
"(>\Xj~
,- ~,:::ttt,,-/:;i';t\,
~y;:',
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my
hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of
Farmington to be affixed this day of
,2003.
-;.:;,
~:c'rt~J'
:~::~,l
,.
Mayor
'1...3 .;?
7 C1...-
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR
March 3, 2003
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
ROLL CALL
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Also Present:
Audience:
Ristow, Cordes, Fitch, Fogarty, Soderberg
None
Joel Jamnik, City Attorney; Ed Shukle, City Administrator; Robin
Roland, Finance Director; Kevin Carroll, Community
Development Director; Dan Siebenaler, Police Chief; Randy
Distad, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of
Public Works/City Engineer; Lisa Shadick, Administrative
Services Director; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Director;
Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant
Jim Gerster, Michael Cox, Dick Graelisch, Randy Oswald, David
Pritzlaff
4. APPROVE AGENDA
Item 7 g) School and Conference - Fire Department was added.
MOTION by Cordes, second by Fogarty to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mr. Dick Graelisch, had a question regarding the February 8, 2003 Council Minutes.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Fitch, second by Soderberg to approve the Consent Agenda as follows:
a) Approved Council Minutes (2/18/03 Regular) (2/15/03 Special)
b) Approved Temporary 3.2 Beer License - Farmington Fastpitch League -
Administration
c) Adopted RESOLUTION RI0-03 Gambling Event Permit - Administration
d) Received Information Capital Outlay - MIS
e) Received Information Capital Outlay NPDES Phase II - Engineering
f) Approved Bills
g) Received Information School and Conference - Fire Department
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
L/33
Council Minutes (Regular)
March 3, 2003
Page 2
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Adopt Resolution - 2003 Seal Coat Project - Engineering
The seal coat program is implemented in a 7-year cycle. The program was
established in 1994. The streets to be seal coated this year include East
Farmington 5th and 6th Additions, Charleswood 2nd Addition, Nelsen Hills Farm
7th Addition and Euclid Street between Euclid Path and Upper 183rd Street West,
Dakota County Estates 6th through 8th Additions, Sunnyside Addition, Oak Street
between 2nd Street and 4th Street, 3rd Street between Elm Street and Spruce Street
and the municipal pool parking lot. The total estimated project cost is $91,050.
The city's special assessment policy indicates a 50/50 cost sharing split between
the city and the benefiting properties for seal coat improvements. The estimated
assessment is $65.04 per residential equivalent unit. MOTION by Soderberg,
second by Cordes to close the public hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION by Fogarty, second by Soderberg adopting RESOLUTION Rll-03
ordering the 2003 seal coat project, approving the plans and specifications and
authorizing the advertisement for bids. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
9. AWARD OF CONTRACT
10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
a) City Hall Task Force Presentation - Administration
The City Hall Task Force has been working since June 2002 on an analysis of
City Hall and its future space needs. Mr. Jim Gerster, Jr., Chair of the Task
Force, presented the final report to Council. Working with Wold Architects, the
Task Force analyzed various needs, locations and costs. The Council had
requested that the options studied remain in the downtown area. The Task Force
found there were deficiencies in space, systems, and the site of the current facility.
There was also a growth need due to increased staff and space needs. They
reviewed renovating on the existing site, build new on existing site, or build new
off site. The Task Force unanimously agreed a new building should be built on
the comer of3rd and Spruce Streets. This location would enhance the downtown
core, it is adjacent to the Senior Center and Public Library, its connection to the
future Spruce Street development, new construction allows for a high degree of
functionality, user-friendly orientation, options for a strong first impression/City
Hall image, no disruption of services during construction, it is adjacent to the
municipal parking lot, and is less costly than other options. The total projected
cost is $6,014,440. Financing was recommended through lease revenue bonds.
There would be no increase in taxes. As the city grows, this would be offset.
This type of financing was also done for the Police and Central Maintenance
facilities. Issues to be considered include the needs will not go away, the longer
we wait the costs will go up, and given the present political structure in the state,
things can change and right now it is set up to work for us. The Task Force would
like to be updated and involved in the pursuit of this project.
'13 t./
Council Minutes (Regular)
March 3, 2003
Page 3
Councilmember Fitch stated he would be strongly against trading one empty
space for another empty space. In other words, ifthe current building is
demolished and it becomes an empty space here, we are just taking up an empty
space at the new location. He has seen too many empty spaces in town and they
seem to remain empty for a long time. If this is done, he feels the city needs to
think seriously about extending the current space to Elm Street. He would like to
see the current building sold for some type of commercial, or small mall, or
executive suites. Mr. Gerster stated these observations were brought up several
times by the Task Force. The city owns both locations (current location and 3rd
and Spruce Street). The proposed location has had very limited interest due to
several reasons. Moving the City Hall to that location opens up a more desirable
location at the current site, because the things that are holding people back from
the 3rd and Spruce Street location do not exist at the current City Hall site. The
Task Force felt the current location would be sold rapidly.
Mayor Ristow stated tonight was to receive the report and to give Council time to
think about it. A workshop could be set up as we get into those details.
Councilmember Fogarty stated looking at the funding between general obligation
or lease revenue bonds, the general obligation bonds come with a lower finance
rate. Finance Director Roland stated it is described by the finance advisors as less
than 1/4%. The general obligation bond requires an election throughout the city,
and it is not based on the tax capacity value, it is based on the market value of the
property. It shifts a higher tax burden to residential properties and away from
commercial properties. A lease revenue bond, being a tax capacity based bond,
would spread the tax across all portions of the tax base equally.
Councilmember Soderberg stated he was part ofthe Task Force and there were
some lively discussions. It was good to see the citizens involved. The product we
have before us is an excellent product. He appreciates the work ofthe Task
Force, staff, and architects.
Mr. Michael Cox, Wold Architects, stated the information was very well
presented. It was a great exercise and the Task Force made their own decision.
Mr. Randy Oswald, Task Force member, stated Mr. Gerster did a fine job on
presenting what the Task Force came up with. He was thankful for the
opportunity to serve on the Task Force.
City Administrator Shukle thanked the Task Force, stating they did an excellent
job. He wanted to get a workshop on the calendar within the next couple months
with the Task Force. Mayor Ristow suggested April or May and to coordinate it
with the Task Force. A date will be brought back to the March 17 Council
meeting.
t../.3 ~
Council Minutes (Regular)
March 3, 2003
Page 4
b) January 2003 Financial Report - Finance
The first month of the year is very light on revenues and hopefully as light on
expenses.
c) Adopt Ordinance - Pawn Shop Amendment - Police
There had previously been a pawn shop in Farmington. An ordinance was not in
place at that time, so an agreement was made with the owner, and through state
laws, to minimize the sale of stolen property through the pawn shop. There
currently is not a pawn shop in the city, so staff compiled an ordinance for any
future pawn shops. The ordinance largely reflects state law, except the city is
requiring a thumbprint identification when an item is sold. This discourages
people who are trying to sell stolen property, and uses technology through an
automated pawn system which records every transaction at every pawn shop.
This was included in the ordinance to allow detectives statewide to access
information. A recommended fee for licensing pawn shops will be included in the
2004 fees resolution unless a business comes forward before then. MOTION by
Soderberg, second by Cordes adopting ORDINANCE 003-486 amending title 3
ofthe Farmington city code by adding a new chapter 26 concerning pawnbrokers
and precious metal dealers. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Adopt Resolution - Akin Road Speed Limit - Engineering
At the February 18 meeting, MnDOT's letter indicated there were two alternatives
for posting the speed limit on Akin Road. The first alternative set the speed limit
at 50 mph from CSAH 50 to 195th Street and 45 mph from 195th Street to Pilot
Knob Road. The second alternative would be to post the speed limit at 50 mph
between CSAH 50 and Eaves Way and 45 mph between Eaves Way and Pilot
Knob Road. In order for the second alternative to be recommended, the city
would have to agree to not posting the 30 mph statutory speed in the urban district
area. A resident questioned whether it would be possible to continue the 45 mph
speed limit all the way south to CSAH 50. MnDOT completed their review and
they have determined that their recommended alternatives as presented will stay
unchanged. Council agreed to accept the second alternative.
Mr. David Pritzlaff, 20255 Akin Road, asked if Council can go beyond MnDOT's
recommendation? Could Council set the speed at 45 mph from CSAH 50 to Pilot
Knob Road? What type of signage would alert people to the speed change? City
Engineer Mann stated the recommendation is what would go to the state traffic
engineer. The city does not have the authority to set the speed limit. Posting the
new speed limits will be coordinated with the traffic engineer.
MOTION by Fogarty, second by Cordes adopting RESOLUTION R12-03
asserting that the speed limits on Akin Road be posted as identified by the second
alternative and agreeing that the city will not post the 30 mph statutory speed limit
in the urban district area. APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
V3&"
Council Minutes (Regular)
March 3, 2003
Page 5
b) Adopt Resolution - Main Street Project Feasibility Report - Engineering
This report was an update to the 1997 Main Street report. The proposed
improvements include the reconstruction of streets, construction of new storm
sewer and the reconstruction and upgrading of trunk and lateral sanitary sewer,
water main and storm sewer. In order to reconstruct Main Street, trunk storm
sewer needs to be reconstructed along 4th Street from Main Street north to the
river. Trunk sanitary sewer needs to be reconstructed along 5th Street from Elm
Street to just north of the river to the MCES interceptor. It is recommended the
proposed improvements be bid as two separate projects. Phase 1 would consist of
the reconstruction of the streets and utilities along all of 4th Street and 5th Street
north ofthe railroad tracks and Willow Street between 4th Street and 5th Street.
Phase 2 construction would consist of the reconstruction of Main Street between
3rd and 8th Streets, 4th Street between Main Street and the railroad tracks, 5th Street
from Elm Street to the railroad tracks and 6th and 7th Streets 1/2 block north and
south of Main Street.
The main change along Main Street would be to narrow Main Street to 32 feet
which is the standard street width. The advantages include lower cost, less
surface water runoff, and causing traffic to slow down because of a narrower
street. Staffis also looking at closing Main Street at TH3. As part of the TH3
access management study, Main Street was identified as a street that should be
closed off due to the proximity of that intersection to Elm Street where there is a
signal. This would also minimize cut-through traffic on Main Street to get to
downtown.
The assessment policy indicates that the reconstructed street and lateral utility
costs are assessed at 35% of improvement costs. Assessments to benefiting
properties for new lateral street and utility costs are 100% of the improvement
cost. Trunk sanitary sewer, storm water and water main are funded with city
trunk funds. For Phase 1 the cost for each residential unit would be $9,624.
Under phase 2 in the area where there is no storm sewer and 100% assessed, the
cost would be $17,200, in the area where there is storm sewer and 35% assessed,
the cost would be $11,350. Under statute 429 the city cannot assess more than the
amount of benefit. Staff did obtain a benefit appraisal, which indicated there is
approximately $6,000 of benefit for each residential equivalent unit. The
commercial properties would be split into residential equivalent units. The city
will need to fund the difference. The total project cost is $5,300,000. The cost to
be assessed based on the appraisal would be $831,000. The city cost would be
$4,460,000. A neighborhood meeting would be held to inform the residents ofthe
cost and get their feedback. This information would be brought back to Council
at the April 7 public hearing.
Mayor Ristow stated he could see narrowing the width of Main Street. He also
asked about Fifth Street to Willow Street and if it would affect the truck traffic
coming out ofKemps. Staffreplied Willow and Fourth Streets are wide streets.
The street would be narrowed approximately 2 feet, which brings it back to
L./3.-7
Council Minutes (Regular)
March 3, 2003
Page 6
standard street width. The Mayor then stated he does have some concerns with
closing the access to TH3 as there is a limited amount of east-west connections,
and it could put more traffic on Elm Street and Ash Street. There is sometimes
congestion backed up onto Elm Street due to the Eagle's Club. Until there are
more openings such as 20Sth Street - he asked how long the street would be closed
and ifit would be closed throughout the project. Staff replied the closing would
be in the second phase of the project, which would be next year. The traffic
engineer could review the situation. It is a safer intersection to enter TH3 from
Elm Street or Willow Street rather than from Main Street. If there did need to be
a reliever for Elm Street perhaps Third or Fourth Street up to Willow Street would
continue to provide that type of an additional outlet. The traffic engineer could
review how closing off Main Street would affect the overall scheme. Mayor
Ristow stated the residents would also have some input at the neighborhood
meeting and the public hearing and maybe they would like it to be closed.
Councilmember Fitch asked ifthe crossover on TH3 would be closed. Staff
stated the traffic coming from the east would still need to be able to make a left
turn onto TH3, so the crossover would have to stay open. Councilmember Fitch
then asked if Main Street could be left open as a right-turn in only? Where traffic
could go one way into it, but not the other way out of it? Staff replied that is a
possibility. There is almost the same situation at Willow Street with people being
able to access the frontage road. Staff will review this situation. That could be an
interim situation until other Council concerns can be resolved. Councilmember
Fitch said his point is that we keep talking about attracting people to downtown
and access is one of the key points. He does not want to see the number of streets
limited for people to get in and out of downtown. Otherwise we will choke off
the downtown, if we do not make access easy. Staff stated that is looked at
carefully. People who are not aware that Main Street goes through and is an
access, are not going to know either way and will use the signal. The people that
find the convenience out of this are the people that live in the area. The question
is how much of an effect is that going to have on those people. There are pro's
and con's either way with closing this off. It is a con for some people to have less
convenient access to their home on Main Street. On the other hand, if it
eliminates cut-through traffic through their neighborhood, some people might find
that appealing.
Councilmember Fogarty stated she is interested to hear what the residents on
Main Street feel. Her guess is that they do not enjoy that traffic. She drives down
TH3 all the time and did not know, until she reviewed this item, that Main Street
was an access point. She does not know if the city would be closing one. Mayor
Ristow stated there is a lot of traffic on Main Street, but sometimes it gets a little
rough. Once it is upgraded there might be more traffic.
MOTION by Soderberg, second by Fitch adopting RESOLUTION R13-03
accepting the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing for April 7, 2003.
APIF, MOTION CARRIED.
'-/3'1)
Council Minutes (Regular)
March 3, 2003
Page 7
12. NEW BUSINESS
13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Councilmember Fitch: Thanked City Administrator Shukle and staff for their
tolerance, candor and exchange of ideas and discussion last week. It was very beneficial.
City Administrator Shukle: Last year he served as the Vice-President of the
Metropolitan Area Management Association (MAMA). This year he was elected to serve
as President.
Finance Director Roland: The Governor has presented his preliminary budget. It was
what the city expected when they put together the 2003 budget. The legislature has until
June to pass the budget and it is good for the city to be cautious. She will keep Council
updated.
Community Development
Director Carroll: The Dakota Electric Annual Partners in Progress event will
be held March 6 at 4:30 p.m.
City Engineer Mann: A workshop will be held with Lakeville regarding Dakota
County's east-west corridor study and the 2030 Blueprint on March 10 at 5:00 p.m.
14. ADJOURN
MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg to adjourn at 8:15 p.m. APIF, MOTION
CARRIED.
Respectfully submitted,
7~~~ h/;J~~
Cynthia Muller
Executive Assistant
yc.39
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
---'; b
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrato~
FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: February 2003 Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes
DATE: March 17,2003
INTRODUCTION
The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission met on February 26, 2003. The draft minutes
from this meeting are included in your meeting packet.
DISCUSSION
In order to make City Council members aware of what the Park and Recreation Advisory
Commission is discussing and taking action on at their meetings, the draft meeting minutes will
be included in the City Council's meeting packet on a monthly basis. The draft meeting minutes
will be placed on the consent agenda as an informational item.
ACTION REQUESTED
No action is requested. The draft meeting minutes are merely for an informational purpose only.
3Dec~1J;1J
~tad,
Parks and Recreation Director
cc: Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Members
'1'10
Draft
Farmington Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Minutes from the Regular Meeting on February 26, 2003
Members Present: Randy Oswald, Paula Higgins, Dawn Johnson and Mike Beringa
Members Absent: Debbie Ruth
Other's Present: Parks and Recreation Director, Randy Distad
1. Call to Order.
The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission (Commission) February 26, 2003 meeting was called to order
by current Chair Johnson at 7:35 p.m. Quorum present.
2. Election of Officers.
Johnson nominated Oswald for 2003 Chair and seconded by Beringa. Johnson, Beringa and Higgins in favor,
Oswald abstained from voting. Motion passed.
Beringa nominated Higgins for 2003 Vice-Chair position and seconded by Chair Oswald. Oswald, Beringa and
Johnson in favor, Higgins abstained from voting. Motion passed.
3. Approval of Agenda.
Beringa moved to approve the agenda and seconded by Higgins. All members voted in favor.
4. Approval of Minutes.
Motion made by Chair Oswald and seconded by Johnson to approve the November 20, 2002 meeting minutes.
Johnson and Oswald voted in favor, Higgins and Beringa abstained from voting. Motion passed.
5. Introductions.
Chair Oswald noted that introductions had been missed and asked that Commission members and staff introduce
themselves.
6. New Business.
A. Development of Park in the Charleswood Development. Director Distad showed a plat of the
development that identified park development items of playground equipment, trails, ballfield and a basketball
court. The trail leading to the park has been constructed. Director Distad identified that there may be some
issues with getting construction equipment down into the park to construct the improvements because there was
no street frontage to the park. This will mean that the construction equipment will need to be brought down into
the park via the trail.
Members Johnson and Oswald stated that past practice of purchasing playground equipment was done through
looking through catalogs. Director Distad suggested going through a Request for Proposal process that would
require two or three playground manufacturers to submit playground plans to the Commission. The
Commission would then review and select one playground plan for the park. By consensus commission
members approved of this process. Director Distad will submit a request for proposals to two or three
playground manufacturers and will bring back the plans at either the March or April meeting for review by the
Commission.
B. Hours for Community Parks and Neighborhood Parks. After a general discussion about park hours,
Commission members by consensus agreed that the park hours should remain the same as what are currently
stated in City Ordinance.
C. Outdoor Rink Opening and Closing Dates. Director Distad stated that staff would like some direction on
when the opening and closing dates of the outdoor rinks should be. After some discussion, motion made by
Higgins that the target date for having the outdoor rinks flooded for use would be December 1 st of each year,
weather permitting and that the last day of outdoor ice would be no later than February 15th weather permitting
and seconded by Beringa. All members in favor, motion passed.
1
<.J Lj I
Draft
D. Skate Park Opening and Closing Dates. Director Distad stated that staff would like to have some
direction on when the skate park should open and close for the season. After some discussion, members reached
a consensus that the skate park should open for the season on May I sl and close for the season on October I SI.
E. Park Dedication Ordinance Discussion. Director Distad reviewed the current Northfield Park Dedication
Ordinance to see if Commission members were interested in either amending or writing a new ordinance.
Member Beringa thought that the Commission ought to have more time to review the Northfield ordinance and
then give feedback to Director Distad on what members thought ought to be incorporated into a new ordinance
for the City of Farmington. Director Distad stated that the process of changing the ordinance would take some
time due to it being a Subdivision Ordinance and that it would need to be taken to the Planning Commission for
a public hearing and then it would need to go to the City Council for its review and approval. It would then
need to be published before it would become effective. Members were in consensus that they would like to
rewrite the ordinance. It was suggested by Chair Oswald that members get their comments on a new park
dedication ordinance to Director Distad in time for the March meeting.
F. Meeting Date and Time. Director Distad stated that since there were several new members on the
Commission that it might be a good time to discuss the meeting date and time to see if it still was ideal for
everyone. Director Distad stated that member Ruth had called and stated that she could meet earlier than 7:30
p.m. and was in favor of moving the meeting to an earlier time. After some discussion a motion was made by
Chair Oswald to move the meeting to the second Wednesday of each month and the meeting starting at 6:00
p.m. and seconded by member Beringa. All members were in favor, motion passed.
7. Staff Report.
Director Distad stated that he would like to have other Department staff come on a seasonal basis to report on
the activities that they do on a seasonal basis. Members were okay with doing this.
Director Distad announced that the Senior Center was changed to the Rambling River Center because it was a
facility that was used by more than just senior citizens and that there is trend a foot to not label facilities or
programs as only for senior citizens.
8. Agenda Items for the March 12th meeting.
Director Distad identified several items for the March meeting including:
. discussion on an exclusive soft drink vending contract in facilities and parks
. review and discuss fees and charges for the Parks and Recreation Department
. review a proposed Youth Scholarship Program for economically disadvantaged youth in the community
. review proposed new park dedication ordinance
Chair Oswald and member Beringa would like to see a discussion start on outdoor athletic facilities and how a
task force might be assembled to begin looking at the City's deficiencies with outdoor athletic facilities, which
mayor may not lead to a referendum.
It was agreed upon by members that Director Distad should give a report on the City Council and City staff
AprilSth Work Retreat at the Commission's April meeting.
9. Adjournment.
Member Beringa moved and member Higgins seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m. All members in
favor, motion passed.
Respectfully Submitted
Randy Distad, CPRP
Parks and Recreation Director
2
t.J 'I ~
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
7C!.J
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator \~
FROM:
Ken Kuchera, Fire Chief
SUBJECT:
Appointment Recommendation - Fire Department
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
The Fire Department will be appointing a new member to its Rescue Squad.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Dave Sender has completed and passed his First Responder course. His appointment to the
Rescue Squad would fulfill the allowable compliment of 18 members. Mr. Sender would be a
great asset for the squad and also has daytime availability.
ACTION REOUESTED
Approve the appointment recommendation for Dave Sender to the Rescue Squad effective March
18,2003.
Respectfully submitted,
kL~
Ken Kuchera
Fire Chief
t./ '-13
TO;
FROM:
DATE:
S.UBJECT:
Ken Ku~hera, FiFe Chief
Todd Kindseth, Rescue Captain
February 26, 2003
New Rescue Member
As of February 26, 2003, Dave Sender will have completed and passed his First
Responder COOIse. Please consider Dave for appointment onto the Rescue Squad.
as he would like to join. Dave would be a great asset for the squad. He also has
day time availability.
If I can provide any further information, please let me know. Thank you for your
consideration.
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
/d
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator ~
FROM:
Lisa Shadick, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT:
Temporary On-Sale Liquor License - St. Michael's Church
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
St. Michael's Church is requesting a Temporary on-sale Liquor License for a Fish Fry, to
be held March 21,2003.
DISCUSSION
This event will be held on St. Michael's property located at 22120 Denmark Ave. Per
State Statute, a Temporary Liquor license must first be approved by the City and then
forwarded to the State for approval.
BUDGET IMPACT
A City fee has not been established for a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License. In
discussion with the Liquor Control Commission, staff was informed that the State of
Minnesota waives all fees for Temporary Liquor Licenses for non-profit organizations.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve the attached application for a Temporary Liquor License for St. Michael's
Church, 22120 Denmark Ave., for their Fish Fry, March 21,2003. The City Council has
not adopted a fee for this permit, and the State of Minnesota waives all fees in this type of
situation, Council may waive any fees associated with this request. Accordingly, no
license fee is proposed at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
~d ~4d~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
1./<</'1
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar St-Suite 133
St. Paul, MN 55101-5133
(651)296-6439 TDD (651)282-6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT
FOR A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
CITY
TAX EXEMPT NUMBER
24133
STA~ N
HOME PHONE
("5/) </<0 - 33lcO ()
TYPE OF ORGANIZATION
o CLUB DCHARITABLE OOLIGIOUS DOTHER NONPROFIT
ADDRESS -+-
t<.YvLL 0-0' o...-f.J...1J n
ZIP CODE
5502~
deJ
DATE ORGANIZED
1 95
ADDRESS
/I
I'
oY
ADDRESS
"
Location where license will be used. If an outdoor area, describe
22\20
D e Y\ \'V'oJl.Y' 1-; A v-e- - So c:.l a I ~ ~ II
(FiSh Frj)
Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor services? If so, give the name and address of the liquor licensee providing the service.
Will the applicant carry liquor liability insurance? If so, the carrier's name and amount f coverage.
(NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory.) fL ~o '-C . r7 0 .
$500 000
APPROVAL
APPUCATlON MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMlTI1NG TO ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
CITY/COUNTY hz./"/n;1:J'-I-Oh DATE APPROVED
CITY FEE AMOUNT "0 LICENSE DATES
T FE j<\ID
APPROVED Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Director
Note: Do not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the original signed by this division
will be returned as the license. Submit to the city or County at least 30 days before the event.
PS-09079 (6198)
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar St-Suite 133
St. Paul, MN 55101-5133
(651)296-6439 TDD (651)282-6555
. .
APPLICATION AND PERMIT
FOR A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
de.\
DATE ORGANIZED
9
TAX EXEMPT.NUMBER
24133
STATE. I
WlN
HOME PHONE
(~51) 410 - 33~O ()
TYPE OF ORGANIZATION
o CLUB OCHARITABLE OOLIGIOUS OOTHER NONPROFIT
ADDRESS -f. ...
Wn.L ()..!j' 0 y OJJ....O ' J
ZIP CODE
5502.t
ADDRESS
iI
or
ADDRESS
"
"
Location where license will be used. If an outdoor area, describe
22120 DeY\h'\Jl-Y"K A~ - SOCial ~GII
(FiSh FY"j)
Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor services? If so, give the name and address of the liquor licensee providing the service.
Will the applicant carry liquor liability insurance? If so, the carrier's name and amount
(NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory,) A... ft"o /c (I
$500 000
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNI'Y BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
CITY/COUNTY )=arP7J'Zl-loP7 DATE APPROVED
~ITY:tFEE ~~ Jf' 0 LICENSE DATES
. ) ---------
SI NA: C~LERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL- APPROVED Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Director
Note: Do not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the original signed by this division
will be returned as the license. Submit to the city or County at least 30 days before the event.
PS-09079 (6198)
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
7e
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator ~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Gambling Event Permit - Dakota County Ducks Unlimited
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
The Dakota County Ducks Unlimited is requesting a Gambling Event Permit for a raffle to be
held at the Farmington Eagles Club.
DISCUSSION
Per State Statute 349.166 and pertinent City Code, a Gambling Permit must be issued by the City
for this type of event. An application has been received, along with the appropriate fees. The
City Attorney has reviewed the application and the attached resolution approving the request.
BUDGET IMPACT
Gambling permit fees are included in the revenue portion of the 2003 budget.
ACTION REQUESTED
Consider the attached Resolution granting a Gambling Event Permit to Dakota County Ducks
Unlimited at the Farmington Eagles Club, 200 Third Street, on September 9,2003.
Respectfully submitted,
~ d.PcAcI~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
<./,-/5
RESOLUTION NO. R -03
APPROVING A MINNESOTA LA WFUL
GAMBLING EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
DAKOTA COUNTY DUCKS UNLIMITED
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 17th day of March
2003 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 349.166, the State of Minnesota Gambling Board may not issue
or renew a Gambling Event Permit unless the City Council adopts a Resolution approving said
permit; and,
WHEREAS, the Dakota County Ducks Unlimited have submitted an application for a Gambling
Event Permit to be conducted at the Eagle's Club, 200 3rd Street, for Council consideration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Farmington City Council that the Gambling
Event Permit for Dakota County Ducks Unlimited to be conducted at the Eagle's Club, 200 3rd
Street is hereby approved.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the
17th day of March 2003.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of
2003.
City Administrator
SEAL
t/l./~
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
7.p-
TO:
Mayor, CouncilmemOOrs and Ci;y Administrator ~
,
FROM:
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT:
Gambling Event Permit - Rotary Club of Farmington
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
The Rotary Club of Farmington is requesting a Gambling Event Permit for $10.00 raffle tickets
to be sold to raise money for Farmington High School Scholarships.
DISCUSSION
Per State Statute 349.166 and pertinent City Code, a Gambling Permit must be issued by the City
for this type of event. An application has been received, along with the appropriate fees. The
City Attorney has reviewed the application and the attached resolution approving the request.
BUDGET IMPACT
Gambling permit fees are included in the revenue portion of the 2003 budget.
ACTION REOUESTED
Consider the attached Resolution granting a Gambling Event Permit to the Rotary Club of
Farmington to sell raffle tickets from March 2003 through April 2003.
Respectfully submitted,
~d.>iA~
Lisa Shadick
Administrative Services Director
'1'17
RESOLUTION NO. R -03
APPROVING A MINNESOTA LAWFUL
GAMBLING EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR
ROTARY CLUB OF FARMINGTON
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 17th day of March
2003 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 349.166, the State of Minnesota Gambling Board may not issue
or renew a Gambling Event Permit unless the City Council adopts a Resolution approving said
permit; and,
WHEREAS, the Rotary Club of Farmington has submitted an application for a Gambling Event
Permit to be conducted at the Eagle's Club, 200 3rd Street, for Council consideration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Farmington City Council that the Gambling
Event Permit for the Rotary Club of Farmington to be conducted at the Eagle's Club, 200 3rd
Street is hereby approved.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the
17th day of March 2003.
Mayor
Attested to the
day of
2003.
City Administrator
SEAL
'-Ill?;
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
~
TO:
Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator
FROM:
Robin Roland, Finance Director
SUBJECT:
Adopt Agreement - Dakota County Fair Board
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
For many years the Farmington Fire Department has provided safety coverage to
the Demolition Derby at the Dakota County Fair - nightly, during the run of the
fair. Recently, it has been agreed by the Fair Board and the Fire Department
that a more formal agreement should be adopted which would insure coverage
for this annual event.
DISCUSSION
Historically, the Fire department has provided a fire truck and a contingent of
firefighters to 'stand-by' at the nightly Demolition Derby. The firefighters were
credited for one (1) required training in August if they worked one night. The Fair
Board then made a contribution to the Cataract Relief Association in recognition
of this service being provided.
Although the City provided the equipment and the manpower, incurring the costs
related (insurance, payroll etc.), no direct monetary compensation was received
by the City. This is not consistent with the City's annual fees & charges
resolution.
The attached agreement attempts to remedy the compensation issue and
formalize the arrangement between the City and the Fair Board. The Fair Board
desired that the compensation be restricted to the use of the Fire department.
As such, the agreement provides for a piece of fire or rescue equipment, of
equal value to the value of the service provided, to be contributed to the City.
The City therefore receives compensation in the form of reduced capital outlay
costs in the Fire I Rescue Department.
449
BUDGET IMPACT
Per the City's annual Fees & Charges Resolution, the cost for the manpower and
equipment would be $3,330 for the 5 night run of the Fair. The Fair Board and
City would need to agree upon the piece of equipment to be donated in advance
of the commencement of the Fair.
ACTION REQUIRED
Adopt the attached agreement between the Dakota County Fair Board and the
City of Farmington.
Respectfully submitted,
/tfJ~J
/ Robin Roland
Finance Director
'150
FIRE SER CE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreem nt") made this day of March, 2003, by and
between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with
offices at 325 Oak, Farmington, Minne ota, and DAKOTA COUNTY FAIR BOARD
("Owner").
WHEREAS, Owner owns the real prope y located in Dakota County legally described on
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporat herein, located within the City of Farmington, MN
("Subject Property").
WHEREAS, Owner has requested that e City provide special fire fighting and related
emergency services to the Owner's property in particular:
Fire and Emergency Equipment an Personnel available to provide emergency services
as necessary in conjunction with th owner's conduct of demolition derby events during
its annual fair.
NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSI ERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS
SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES GREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City will provide the reques ed service under this Agreement for the next 3 years
through December 31, 2006, d assume all responsibility for equipment and
personnel to be provided, inclu ing, but not limited to, compensation and insurance
matters.
2. Owner will compensate the Cit by providing to the City a piece of fire or rescue
equipment of equal value to the value of services rendered if said services had been
charged at the rates outlined by the City's annual Fees & Charges Resolution. Said
fire/rescue equipment to be agr ed upon by both parties prior to the commencement
of the annual fair.
CITY OF FARMINGTON:
By:
Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor
By:
Edward J. Shukle, City Administrator
~.sl
DAKOTA COUNTY FAIR
By:
By:
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of , 2003, by
Gerald G. Ristow and Edward J. Shukle, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the CITY OF
FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority
granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
) ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
and , the
day of
and
, 2003, by
of Owner,
Dakota County Fair.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Attorneys at Law
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan. MN 55121
Telephone: (651) 452-5000
JJJ
</5d;
DESCRIPTION 0 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
y53
Exhibit "A" to Fire Services Contract
Ash Street
Property 10 LIr
1) 070060001525
2) 072375008000 6 7
3) 072375007000
4) 072375006100 8
5) 070060001325
6) 070060001102
7) 070060001202
8) 070060001003
10
9) 070060001050
10) 070060001076
11) 070060001075
11
N
A
tJ5~
7J;
City f Farmington
325 Oak Stre t, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463 7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.~i.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator ~
FROM:
Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Approve Change Order - City Facilities Project
DATE:
March 17,2003
INTRODUCTION
Forwarded herewith for Council's review and consideration is change order #9 for the City's
facilities project.
DISCUSSION
The attached memo from WOLD Architects outlines the recommended expenditures for change order
#9. The majority of the costs of the change order ($178,882) are related to the addition of the
roadway to Well # 5 and the future fueling station area. The Water Board is responsible for the cost
directly associated with the well house road, which is approximately $110,000 of the $178,882. The
remaining items include an induction fan in the Maintenance Facility boiler room to solve negative
pressure issues and other smaller miscellaneous items.
BUDGET IMPACT
The total cost for change order #9 is $18a,871. The costs for the change order are within the
project's contingency fund balance.
ACTION REQUESTED
Approve by motion, change order # 9 for the City Facilities project in the amount of$188,871.00.
Respectfully Submitted,
~rvt/11~
Lee M. Mann, P.E.,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
cc: file
,/56
03/12/03 12:09 FAX 651 223 5646
JUOlO
; .
TO~
FROM:
DATE;
COMM. NO:
WOLD 'ARCHITECTS
MEMORANDUM
Lee Mann
John McNamara
March 12,2003
00086
141 002
'WULU ARClIITECTS
^NIJ ENCTNnllRS
30; ST. PETER S I~H.I
S'L J>^l.'L, MN S'ilOJ
651.227.7773
FAX 651.223.5646
25 SOUTH GROVE AVENl:...
SUIT!:' 500
hGIl'!. 1L 60120
R47.f>Oll.2600
1'^)( 8-17.f>OfI.2(,;4
SUBIt:.Cl':
WWW.WOLDAF..C'.l'JI
M^II.(4lWOLD^f.CO~l
Farmington North Ml.nllcipal Campus - Phase I
The following are recommended !:ontract changes for the North Municipal Campus. The
approved costs have been review~d and represent a fair value for the work performed.
ltem
RFI #78
PR #23, Item 2
PR #28
SI #85
Misc. Cost #39
Misc. Cost #60,
&61
Misc. Cost #63
&64
Misc. Cost #65
Description
The steel for ~e supports at the reception window
at the Police Station were extended to the roof
deck. This cost is to add clip angles to thc roof
structure.
During the fin~l phase of the project, a road was
requested to the existing well house. In addition, a
concrete pad, 4;urb and drive area was added for a
future fueling ~sland. This cost represents a time
and materials maximum.
An induction fan was needed at the boiler room at
the CMF. Ovf1I<lll building negative pressure
caused the boilIer to shutwoff at times.
Epoxy paint fl!ooring was added to the Booking
area at the Pol~ce Station in lieu ofregular floor
painting.
A new door 3.1ltd frame was added to the CMF
mezzanine to ~l1ow future access to the
compressor.
Additional so(i and restoration work was performed
on the northeast section of the site adjacent to the
new housing cllevelopmcnt.
Curb, gutter and sod were added at the well house
when the neW! road was added.
Vinyl base ~s added in the booking area at the
Polict; Station. .
AOOToved Cost
$510
$154,798
$4,295
$861
$1,092
$18,063
$6,021
$176
y's'~
03/12/03 12:10 FAX 651 223 5646
WOLD ARCHITECTS
lU~LD
Memorandum to Lee Mann
Page Two
Misc. Cost #67 Additional electrical work was added at the
generators as requested by Dakota Electric to anow
proper operations.
Misc. Cost #70 Additlonal electrical work was required to connect
the generator a~ the eMF provided by Da.kota
Electric.
Misc. Cost #75 An exterior wall mounted light fixture was damaged
a.t the Police Station during the move. This cost was
to replace the fixture.
1aI 003
$1,055
$738
$1,262
Total Change Order #9
$188,871
Upon approval by City Council. we will issue Change Order #9 for the project.
If you have any questions, please call.
cc; Robin Roland, City of Fanni.b.gton
Michael Cox, Wold
Brendon Stuckey, Wold
CKlCI_FamringtonlOOO86/rn3r03
1-
~5?
~'
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
FROM:
Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator ~
Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director
TO:
SUBJECT:
City of Farmington Recycling Survey
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
The City's Solid Waste Division mails a recycling survey to residents every other year.
A survey was mailed to randomly selected residents in December of 2002. The surveys
were then returned to the City, reviewed by staff, tabulated and a report was prepared.
DISCUSSION
The recycling survey report is attached. The report categorizes responses by
homeowners according to the length of years that they have been residents of the City.
Staff is currently doing a follow up on the survey comments where responses are
warranted. Letters are being sent to survey respondents who have included a mailing
address on the returned survey. Recognition should be given to Lena Larson, Public
Works Administrative Assistant for her involvement in preparing and mailing out the
survey and then tabulating and preparing the report from the surveys that were returned.
She has also been mailing follow up letters that address questions or requests for
information that residents have asked about.
ACTION REOUESTED
There is no action needed to be taken on this agenda item. The survey was included in
the City Council packet for informational purposes only.
(~~tfullY s;JJtD
~~
Parks and Recreation Director
cc: Benno Klotz, Solid Waste Supervisor
Lena Larson, Public Works Administrative Assistant
,-/5.::0
City of Farmington
2002 Recycling Survey Results
March, 2003
In December of 2002, 609 surveys were sent to residents randomly chosen in the City of
Farmington. Of the 609 sent out, 245 (40%) were returned. A summary of the survey results are
contained in this report.
How long have you been a resident of Farmington?
lenath.of relidency Total %
under 1 year 26 11%
1 - 5 years 77 31%
5 - 10 years 39 16%
10 - 15 years 25 10%
over 15 vears 77 31%
no reSDonse 1 0%
245
Do you own or rent your home?
241 of the responses were home owners, 2 were renters and 2 did not respond.
How frequently do you recycle at the curb?
... under 1 1 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 15 over 15
1<< . Freauency Total % year years years vears years unknown
weekly 188 77% 18 62 30 19 58 1
twice a month 35 14% 4 10 4 2 15 0
once a month 9 4% 0 1 2 2 4 0
never 11 4% 4 2 3 2 0 0
no reSDonse 2 1% 0 2 0 0 0 0
245 26 77 39 25 77 1
. Which items do you most commonly recycle?
Item Combined #
newspaoer 212 87%
cans 201 82%
olastic 195 80%
mail 87 36%
phone books 69 28%
cardboard 108 44%
box board 73 30%
maQazines 107 44%
Qlass 179 73%
other 3 1%
How do youflnd out about local recycling programs?
less than 1 1 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 15
year years years years 15+ years unknown
Recyclinq & Disoosal Guide 163 67% 11 49 31 18 53 1
City newsletter 117 48% 8 26 21 13 49 0
DC Green Guide 88 36% 5 26 18 7 31 1
newspaper 31 13% 3 5 5 2 15 1
website 9 4% 2 2 2 0 3 0
City staff 14 6% 5 6 0 0 3 0
County staff 4 2% 1 0 1 0 2 0
other 5 2% 1 3 0 0 1 0
Which drop off sites have you used during the past year?
less than 1 1 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 15 15+
Total % year years years years years unknown
Used no drop offs 107 44% 15 31 15 12 34 0
Used Eco-Site 45 18% 4 17 3 3 18 0
Used SKB 105 43% 10 31 18 10 35 1
Used HHW 1 Day
drop off 18 7% 0 7 6 2 3 0
Have you called Farmington City Hall regarding solid waste and/or recycling in the past year?
Sixty-four (64) or 26% of the residents responding had called City Hall in the past
year. Of the 64, 60 (94%) felt that their request was handled promptly and 94% found staff
to be courteous and/or helpful.
Have you called Lakeville Sanitary/Dick's Sanitation regarding recycling, yard waste or extra
garbage in the past year?
Fifty-one (51) or 21 % of the residents responding had called Lakeville Sanitary,
Inc.lDick's Sanitation, Inc. in the past year. Of the 51, 49, (89%) felt that their request was
handled promptly and found staff to be courteous and/or helpful.
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results.doc
Page 2 of 10
;jc;O
Did you know you could choose one of three sizes of garbage containers?
oyer
under 1-5 5 -10 10 -15 15
Total 1 year years years years years unknown
yes 203 83% 21 81% 63 82% 31 79% 19 76% 68 88% 1
no 42 17% 5 19% 14 18% 8 21% 6 24% 9 12% 0
n/a 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
245 26 77 39 25 77 1
Did you know you are not limited to the amount of recycling you put out?
over
under 1 1 - 5 5 -10 10 - 15 15
Total % year years vears years vears unknown
yes 185 76% 12 46% 50 65% 35 90% 21 84% 66 86% 1
no 59 24% 14 54% 27 35% 4 10% 4 16% 10 13% 0
nla 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0
245 26 77 39 25 77 1
Did you know you can separate your recyclables into 3 sorts?
under 5- 10 - over
1 1 - 5 10 15 15
Total year vears years years vears unknown
yes 165 67% 14 54% 41 53% 32 82% 17 68% 61 79% 0
no 74 30% 12 46% 33 43% 7 18% 6 24% 15 19% 1
n/a 6 2% 0 0% 3 4% 0 0% 2 8% 1 1% 0
245 26 77 39 25 77 1
Are you aware of the following services?
Aware of
Clean UO Dav Total
yes 228 93%
no 16 7%
n/a 1 0%
Aware of Xmas
Tree oickuo Total
yes 193 79%
no 37 15%
nla 15 6%
Aware of Seasonal
YW PrOQram Total
yes 165 67%
no 67 27%
n/a 13 5%
Aware of CB
cages Total
yes 183 75%
no 53 22%
n/a 9 4%
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results,doc
Page3 of I 0
4ro/
Aware of Cable Information Cltannel16?
under 1 10 -15 over 15
Aware of cable Total year 1 - 5 years 5 - 10 years years years unknown
yes 177 72% 13 56 32 21 55 0
no 62 25% 13 20 6 4 18 1
nla 6 2% 0 1 1 0 4 0
245 26 77 39 25 77 1
How satisfied are you witlt tlte recycling program in Farmington?
Recycling under 5- 10 - over
program 1 1-5 10 15 15
satisfaction Total % year years years years years unknown
very
satisfied 112 46% 8 31% 40 52% 16 14% 5 4% 42 38% 1
satisfied 119 49% 15 58% 34 44% 21 18% 18 15% 31 26%
somewhat
satisfied 6 2% 2 8% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 3 50%
somewhat
dissatisfied 2 1% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0%
dissatisfied 1 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
nla 5 2% 1 4% 0 0% 2 40% 1 20% 1 20%
245 26 77 39 25 77
Recycl ing Program Satisfaction
dissatisfied, 1,
O~O
very satisfied,
112,47%
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results. doc
Page 4 of 10
t..j(pC)
How satisfied are you witlt tlte solid waste/garbage program in Farmington?
under 1-5 5 -10
1 ear ears ears
46% 5 19% 39 51% 17 44% 24% 44 57%
48% 19 73% 31 40% 21 54% 60% 31 40%
10 4% 2 8% 2 3% 3% 3 12% 2 3%
1 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
4 2% 0 0% 3 4% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0%
no res onse 1 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0%
245 26 77 39 25 77
Solid Waste/Garbage Satisfaction
somewhat
dissatisfied, 1,
0%
dissatisfied ,4,
2%
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results.doc
Page 5 of 10
</~3
How satisfied are you witlt tlte yard waste program in Farmington?
under 5- 10 - over
YW 1 1 - 5 10 15 15
satisfaction Total vear years years vears vears unknown
very
satisfied 56 23% 2 8% 21 27% 7 18% 3 12% 22 29% 1
satisfied 83 34% 11 42% 22 29% 15 38% 10 40% 25 32%
somewhat
satisfied 10 4% 1 4% 4 5% 1 3% 3 12% 1 1%
somewhat
dissatisfied 1 0% 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
dissatisfied 4 2% 0 0% 2 3% 2 5% 0 0% 0 0%
no
response 91 37% 11 42% 28 36% 14 36% 9 36% 29 38%
245 26 77 39 25 77
Yard Waste Satisfaction
100
90
c;) 80
61
c;) 70
~
0
a..
c;) 60
61
at.
..... 50
0
L 40
61
..Q
E 30
:::J
Z 20
10
0
C
&. (lJ
~C:)
e:,'li
~(;\
~
C
&. (lJ
~C:)
e:,'li
o c . c
~ ro &. (lJ . '&- (lJ
~e:, ~C:) ~C:)
e:,'l> f!-:J'li. f!-:Je:,
~ &-C:) 0'
~'(;;' ~
~ro ~'(;;'
e:,O ~ro
e:,O
~~
o~
~e:,~
0<:'
~
Level of Satisfaction
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results. doc
Page 6 of 10
'1~~
2002 Recycling Survey Comments
. It would be nice to have competition for our garbage business rather than it being a
government decision.
. Have own chippers, so do my own recycling of yard waste.
. Thank you for asking for our opinion.
. I think, I could use a bigger garbage container.. .could I get more information.. .thanks.
. Would like to have monthly billing option available for those of us that would like it.
. Being charged extra for a larger garbage can is not very convenient. Otherwise, we are
satisfied. This survey is a great idea. . .I realize I need to work more at recycling.
. They forget our yard waste a lot during the summer.
. On several occasions during the past 2-3 month several houses on Elkridge Trail have had
their recycling not picked up and each time we have complained, but we were forced to store
the recycle material another week. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
. I used to get a garbage pick-up schedule for holidays but didn't get one this year. I put my
garbage out on the curb the Friday after Thanksgiving (pick-up day is Thursday) and it wasn't
picked up until Monday. I didn't mind the late pick-up, but it would have been nice to know
when my garbage was actually supposed to be put out.
. Would encourage provision of additional recycle containers for those who want them to
eliminate blowing/spilled garbage/recycle. Also Drivers are friendly for garbage.. ..Recycle
men are not.
. I am very disappointed in the loss of the Waste Facility going away. Also Farmington City
lack of interest in providing competitive bids for home garbage removal.
. I'm impressed with Farmington services!
. We are so pleased to be in a community where recycling is so well supported. Thank you for
the work it takes to do this!
. I thought the yard waste pick-up was a paid service additional to the regular service.
. We did not like Monday pick-up after Thanksgiving. Our normal pick-up is Thursday. Just too
long without garbage pick-up. Please rethink this in the future. Thank you!
. I wish we could dispose of more garbage than what goes in the container. We use the extra
garbage pick -up at least 3 times a year and that gets spendy . We also have the largest
container. I do home daycare so we have more than average garbage.
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results. doc
Page 7 of 10
'i'~
. I should not have to pay to get rid of yard waste. It should be picked up at the curb, or dropped
off at no charge. We should be recycling metal cans also, like canned foods type
. He thinks yard waste should be free.
. Would like to be able to get more than one recycle container.
. It concerns me that the City of Farmington is not open to bids or for individuals to use a
garbage removal service of their own choice. The City charge for garbage removal in my
opinion is excessive. They should allow for competition.
. I especially appreciate "junkday". Wish you still had it twice a year. Thanks so much for
doing/having this service.
. I don't recycle because I really don't have adequate information on recycling for example
what to recycle, where to bring extra stuff etc.
. Other garbage services we've used have picked up extra garbage free of charge if it wasn't
excessive and habitual. I dislike leaving a bag of garbage in the garage for the next weeks pick
up. On the rare occasions I have an excess of garbage to fit in the container.
. We had no idea what day pick up for garbage was on Thanksgiving week, nor do we know
about X-mas week. We pay for weekly pick-up but when they don't pick, we are not credited.
. I just wish our recycling bin would not be removed from our driveway. We had 2 of the bins
taken in the past 2 years. We currently don't have one now.
. For questions.. .are there different prices? We have a garbage can that has a false bottom to it.
It would be nice to have a full opening inside.
. My only wish for garbage would be if they picked up large black bags/additional bags that
would not fit in the can. i.e. bags of Styrofoam etc. from packing boxes etc.
. I would like to see the curbside clean up day go back to twice a year. Things pile up and if it
were twice, sure would only have half as much each time.
. Do not know about program.
. I wish the recyclers would be more careful! After they stop the streets are littered with cans,
plastic and paper. If they drop things, they don't pick them up, I have watched them.
. Did not know about the seasonal yard waste program.
. You are all doing a wonderful job at keeping our City of Farmington looking great. Keep up
the good work.
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results. doc
Page 8 of to
</ C;; ~
. Do not like to make cardboard 2' x 2' and bound with twine!! for curbside pick up.
. Why do we have to pay such a large fee for disposal of our leaves at the compost site, if we
are a resident of Dakota County? The fee is a lot I mean. Most people are just driving down
the dirt roads and getting rid of the leaves, because the fee is so high!! Please reconsider the
fees for the leaves. Thank you!
. Weare not at all satisfied with the picture and sound recording of your City Council meetings
on TV. The picture is blurry, rolling, snowy and the sound cuts out completely where you
can't finish hearing what the council or people are saying. It cracks so. Will you please fix this
as the people are paying a high fee for their cable TV. Channel 16.
. Think it is expensive to dispose of bags of leaves at yard waste facility.
. Would like flexibility in the seasonal yard waste. Pay for only each week you use it.
. Excellent job with the services provided to meet our needs. Thanks.
. More info on costs of different garbage containers. More info on # 13.
. We just moved here so we are not familiar with the recycling program but we would like more
information on it. Thanks.
. Entire Park Place development was ignored for garbage pick up the whole week of
Thanksgiving. Next year it should be on Wednesday before or Friday after.
. Garbage and recycling seem to be very reliable and consistent. Thank you.
. I did not know you could recycle phone books, mail, etc. What else can be recycled? What is
the seasonal waste program?
. What is the seasonal yard waste program? 2. How much is the largest garbage container vs.
medium size per billing period? 3. Who to call if we want to change?
. Would like to get more information on the seasonal yard waste program.
. Very good services. Only recommendations: curbside clean up Fall and Spring not as tight of
controls on cardboard pick up.
. Consider picking up garbage before the holidays rather than after, excess garbage accumulates
due to Thanksgiving and some residents are not aware of the change. With last weeks windy
weather, Embers Ave was heavily littered.
. Do you pick up cardboard?
. Garbage, Water and Sewer to much cost.
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results. doc
Page 9 of 10
t./~7
. Should be able to recycle more plastic products like yogurt and applesauce containers.
. I live in a townhouse and do not have yard waste.
. Did you know that on the above 3 questions, there are 2 "somewhat dissatisfied" boxes for
each line? You must have been expecting a lot of "somewhat dissatisfied".
. Like many others I work where lots of copier paper is used. I used to put my papers in the
copier paper boxes I brought home. This was easy, convenient storage in my garage and also
resulted in recycling the cardboard boxes from my work place. I would like to see this as
an acceptable method for collecting newspapers.
. I think it's time you took money off our water bill for all the recycling we do. They do that in
the city. Why not here?
. We have been very happy with our service. I have even seen the recycling crews picking up
trash in yards blowing in the wind.
. Barb @ the Chamber of Commerce was very friendly and offered much helpful advice when I
called with a ton of questions. This is our first home and I had many utility questions. Thanks
Barb!
. Think you folks do a wonderful job!
. I'm not satisfied with the garbage service, because when I've lived in other cities and had an
extra bag or two, I could set them next to the can and they were also picked up. (at no
charge!). It's frustrating to be FORCED to take a garbage service that doesn't give the same
service, as I could get in other cities. Also, garbage flies around the neighborhood on garbage
days. We also had garbage of an odd shape size that doesn't fit in the can, and it's a pain and
expensive to call Dick's when in other cities we'd put it next to the can.
H:\2002 Farmington Recycling survey results. doc
Page 10 of to
t.j~~
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington. MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.cLfarmington.mn.us
6~
TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City AdminiStralOf
FROM: Randy Distad, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Resolution for Capital Outlay Purchase by the Parks and Recreation Department
DATE: March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
On March 12,2003, sealed bids for a new Solid Waste automated refuse packer and chassis were
opened.
DISCUSSION
Six packets were mailed to interested bidders. Two sealed bids were received by the City. The
companies providing bids for this equipment were as follows:
1. MacQueen Equipment with a Peterbuilt Truck Chassis
2. MacQueen Equipment with a Sterling Truck Chassis
Total Bid: $168.396.00
Total Bid: $173.862.00
This specialized automated refuse packer equipment is only available from limited suppliers.
Both bids were for the same packer with different truck chassis.
The bids also included the trade-in of the 1991 Mack with a 1998 Automated Side Load Body.
MacQueen Equipment allowed a deduction of $8,000.00 for the trade-in value, which is reflected
in the above bids.
BUDGET IMPACT
The approved amount for the purchase of the new Solid Waste automated refuse packer and
chassis in the 2003 budget was $185,000.00. The apparent low bid is in the amount of
$168,396.00, which is $16,604.00 under the budgeted amount.
ACTION REOUESTED
Approve a resolution that awards the bid to MacQueen Equipment in the amount of $168,396.00
for the purchase of a new Solid Waste automated refuse packer and chassis.
E.es ectfuIly SUb4~ f}
/ _0 j)~
an y Di:dw,
Parks and Recreation Director
cc: Benno Klotz, Solid Waste Supervisor
t../ t, 9
RESOLUTION NO. R -03
AWARDING BID TO MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT FOR AN AUTOMATED REFUSE
PACKER AND CHASSIS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 17th day of March,
2003 at 7:00 p.m.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, pursuant to properly published notice, bids were received, opened and tabulated,
which complied with the advertisement; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a recommendation from the Parks and Recreation
Director on the Award for this equipment purchase.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Farmington hereby awards the
contract for the Solid Waste automated refuse packer and chassis to MacQueen Equipment in the
amount of$168,396.00.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the
17th day of March, 2003.
Mayor
Attested to the 17th day of March, 2003.
City Administrator
SEAL
'170
,---------
9'c:=......
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
FROM:
Mayor, Council Members,
City Administrator ~
Jim Atkinson
Assistant City Planner
'{fV
\
TO:
SUBJECT:
Consider Easement Vacation - Glenview Commercial Addition
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
As part of the platting process for the proposed Glenview Commercial Addition, a
drainage and utility easement must be vacated. As shown on the attached preliminary
plat, a portion of the easement is located adjacent to the south line of the existing Outlot
"A". The other portion of the easement is located adjacent to the eastern edge of the
trunk Highway 3 right of way, which was recently vacated by the State in conjunction
with the rerouting of 9th Street to the east.
DISCUSSION
In order to provide adequate protection for the existing watermain located on the site,
the City is requiring the developer to provide easements in conjunction with the proposed
plat. The easements currently located on the site are no longer adequate since Outlot "A"
would be eliminated with the proposed plat and since a portion of Trunk Highway 3 right-
of-way has recently been vacated. In order to provide new easements, the existing
easements must be vacated.
A new easement would be provided along the north property line extending 25 feet to the
south. An additional easement would be provided from north to south extending ten (10)
feet on either side of the existing watermain located along the former Trunk Highway 3
right of way.
ACTION REQUIRED
Adopt the attached resolution vacating the described drainage and utility easement in the
proposed Glenview Commercial Addition.
Respectfully submitted,
~ ,-\
(--I (^- U::t-
Jim Atkinson
Assistant City Planner
V7~
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION V ACA TING AN EASEMENT
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 17th day of March,
2003, at 7:00 P.M.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Member
introduced and Member
seconded the following:
WHEREAS, Mr. Tim Giles ofT.C. Construction has applied for preliminary and final plat
approval of the Glenview Commercial Addition; and
WHEREAS, the City of Farmington has a watermain that exists on the site; and
WHEREAS, the City of Farmington has determined that the existing easements would no longer
be adequate if the plat were approved since Outlot "A" and a portion of Trunk Highway 3 right
of way would be abandoned; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide new easements, the existing easements must be vacated; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~ 412.851, the Farmington City Council has conducted a
hearing preceded by published and posted notice to consider the easement vacation requested by
the Developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Farmington:
1. The drainage and utility easement shown on the attached preliminary plat is
hereby vacated.
2. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the
County Auditor and County Recorder in and for Dakota County, Minnesota.
<1'3
This resolution adopted by recorded vote ofthe Farmington City Council in open session on the
17th day of March, 2003.
CITY OF FARMINGTON
Mayor
Attested to the _ day of
2003.
City Administrator
(SEAL)
'17'1
I \
I I
J \
I \
/ I
I I
I I
I I
I \
, \
I \
I \
I
,
-~
I ClIO
\
\
I
\
\
.\
\
\
\
I
1 ...
\/" I,
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
I
I
\
\
\
, ,
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
11
(
I
,
I
I
I
,I'
,I
II
,tIlL
11m,
If! I
I L -"'
1
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
cD
$
\
\
\
\
fa1
ON
N.t""
~ t'-.
0"1'
(Qoi
Ot
%,
o~....
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
\
\
\
~~
(11
~I.I.
:::JO
o
(11'"
.......
I&.I~
:I:
I-~
...Z
01&.1
I&.I:I:
zl-
~...
1-0
en...
1&.1.......
~~
~ -,
......
C
Wa
Z'"
g- I
~ I
III t
<( I
J
W
III
0,.
t:.q,
---
....
I
I
/
~
lb
I, I
\/
I~
,..
-<:)-
/
I
\
-..JU'I..1. :J
SIl~30'3~"E
190
(j tJ T: :-, T '
"-- ,,,. A
DRAINACE AND unu IV EASEI.lEN r
(TO BE: VACATEO)
. ,--
. t t ,
_..." ,
E3 L_ t-", C: r<~
"-
"-
/
/
I
(
\
\ ..... _ _J?:,'?,rJ"
'.
,/
/
I
/
/
I
I
I
I
I
~
<3'
\
\
\
\
"-
~
\,
: [-I T /-,
..._..." I t:...
\
o '\ 't-- '\
\... OC
<O\...
--r--
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
./
/
\
\
\
"
"
"
\
\
"
......--/
_ ~<i>/
"
/
I
pp
~
.^
I
I
I
(
I
\
\
<'s,d\,
....
....
\
\
\
\
\N
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
/ ,/ - - -{:~
I -
I
I
/
/
"
\
\
\,
\
\
\
\
1
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
I
1
I
I
\ SOUTH UNE OF ThE SOUTH HALF OF
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
SEe 32.
/
Ell.
S[flY 348
"
x'"
0"... ""
(
\
..,
..",
o
....
I
-
o
" I, -
(l. '\ :g. , 20111
IftD (';\t::..;... - - \
~c. ....S~ I
I ci I g.. I 20
:125 25., /
: I II,. / I
.11 .I~ i I
a I I /
!I df I I (
u , I
~I I I \
I ~ /1
/lu I,
I I; d
i : I ~ 1
9 I[ I
9 I: 1
, I I 'I' .to
Ti'II;
!~I: ,i,!:~
I &1, I ~l :~
! 0:: iiil I::::>
,~ /...1 IG)\
i('J) I~il II
::r: I":! 'I
I ~ I ~il'l
ml, 3(111)
L_t~-Y I : :
_1;15__ -\~.2~tf H~i
~ \:'\1 I!
\ \1 ,~.J
-
.
.x
POND
YlTZR 1LZ'I.-all8.8
.....
....
....
....
....
.....
'-_I
- 89
8- ,_
~
I
I
I
I
/
25 i \
--"j.
"'
-------i-_ "I.
g., - - -'-"
_~~s--~
"
~ .N89"48'08"W
,,_ _ __ _~~ -"::'t~i.~-~ ~2<!15_
213TH
STREET
=---
</75
/ t)a.,
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
FROM:
Mayor, Council Members, lOt/'
City Administrator ~ \VY
Jim Atkinson
Assistant City Planner
SUBJECT:
Glenview Commercial Addition Preliminary and Final Plat
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
The applicant, Tim Giles, is seeking approval of the Glenview Commercial Addition
Preliminary and Final Plat. The plat consists of 4.71 acres of land located at the
northeast corner of Trunk Highway 3 and 213th Street. Ninth Street was recently
realigned from the west side of the proposed commercial addition (directly adjacent
to Trunk Highway 3) to the east side. The new alignment of Ninth Street separates the
Glenview Townhomes from the proposed commercial addition.
Planning Division Review
Area Bounded By:
Dakota Storage to the north, Trunk Highway 3 to the
west, the Glenview Townhomes to the east, and the
Allina medical clinic to the south.
Existing Zoning:
B-1 (Highway Business) District
Comprehensive Plan:
Business
Existing Conditions:
Ninth Street was recently realigned and is now
located on the east portion of the proposed plat.
The remaining area currently consists of three (3)
separate parcels.
Topography:
The site is relatively flat.
Parkland and Trails:
The parkland dedication requirement is currently
under review.
'-I /~
DISCUSSION
As shown on the plat, the site currently consists of three (3) parcels as designated by
dashed lines. The proposed plat would consolidate the three (3) parcels and the
abandoned Trunk Highway 3 right of way to create one (1) parcel on the west side of
ninth street (Lot 1 Block 1). The realignment of Ninth Street created two additional
parcels located to the east of Ninth Street: Lot 1 Block 1, and Outlot "A".
It is unknown at this time what specific use would be present on the property. It is
zoned B-1, highway business, and therefore could accommodate any business allowed
in that district. Access to the site would be reviewed when a specific use is proposed.
If more than one business is proposed requiring more than one lot, a replat would be
required depicting the new lot configuration.
Easements
The former alignment of Ninth Street included a connection to Trunk Highway 3 along
the north side of the proposed plat (shown as Outlot A). This was a private street and
did not have any right of way associated with it. There is, however, a drainage and
utility easement present along the former roadway. In addition, a drainage and utility
easement currently exists along the former edge of the Trunk Highway 3 right-of-way
that was recently vacated by the State. In order for the plat to proceed, this
easement must be vacated. As shown on the attached plat, new drainage and utility
easements would be created.
Area Summary
Lot 1, Block 1 =
Lot 1, Block 2 =
Outlot A =
Total Area =
3.59 acres
.24 acres
. 15 acres
4.71 acres
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning Commission reviewed this request at their meeting on March 11, 2003
and unanimously recommended approval of the proposed plat.
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for the
Glenview Commercial Addition contingent upon the following conditions:
. Existing drainage and utility easements (as shown on the attached Exhibit) shall be
vacated prior to final approval.
. The Engineering Division shall approve construction plans for grading, storm water
and utilities.
'1//
. Execution of a Development Contract between the Developer and the City of
Farmington and submission of security, payment of all fees and costs and
submission of all other documents required under the Development Contract.
Respectfully submitted,
/l ~~
~!v-
Jim Atkinson
Assistant City Planner
Attachments:
1. Easements to be vacated
2. Glenview Commercial Addition Plat
3. Resolution Approving the Preliminary and Final Plat
c.j 7~
I \
I \
I \
I \
I ,
, I
, I
I I
I \
I \
I \
, \
I
,
'<<
I ClIO
\
\
\
\
\
. \
\
\
\
\
\ ;
1/..... \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
I
,
,
\
\
,
. \
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ I
I /
,I
(
I
I
I
,
I
Ii'
II
II
110.
III1:S \
,i<1 \
,l_ ....
l
\
\
\
\
I
I
\
<D
$
,
\
\
\-
.......
o
w.
za
g11U J
~ I
~ I
I
1Il J
0....
~
~ ~ I
. a: 10
o "
Z w
~ ~ I
;: l-
X Z
t:) 0
: ~ I
fl 3 ~
ON a: "
N g'J ! I- j
~~i zz_ !
COOl i).~
01 :E .
%1 ...., ~I i
eEl<. Iii
Sl'" .... 0
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
,
~ cn....J
I 10
WI
J:...
>- -.
t..,;'"
01
N
..,
u
....
VI
j:t..,
~o
o
VI'"
.......
....-
:x:
I-~
t..,z
0....
....:x:
zl-
:Jt..,
o
I-
VI...
...........
~-
....
-0-
~ -1
ti
-~
...
\
I
I
~
~
\ /
\/
(
/ "
I '\
/ \
/' \,
/
/
I
I
I
~
c1'
\
\
\
\
"
~
\
\
\
\
\
I
,
f
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
I
i
I
I
'.aU"i.1.;)
SIl?-30'39"E
,
. 'O<!O~.
."
190
/
,
\
'i: Ii' ,-,..
l411toJ,L."J: A
"
Xc>
0..... 1M
(
\
OIlAlNACE ANI) unulY EASEMENT
(TO BE VACATED)
: :-,7
_...." f
i:3: r-I,...... ~('
\'.. t.._ _, ,-" . '.
"
"
: r-' T ,-)
...._.." I ~..
"
o
'"
-",
'- '\
"
"
'\. " I
~" '\. \ I J I
~" " '\. \ '/ I
'\ "'--~" /
- '\ \ ElL "" JEll.
.... ...~ ClI
a. \ \"'9 I~
-..s-h. ,- (' -,
.....,,_......, '<fg.'
................,,, ......,
g;... 1M :---. "" .......
" ...
" "
" " .
\<\~
\ \ \ \
I \
\ ' \
\ I
I I
( " ;
f \
I I
I I
I! i
; I
II I
I I
I f
, I
I,. I
. I ,
! I
1// [
/
/
,
I
\ .....
" '- _ -'OOj-o'
"
\
o '\ +- '\
\... OC
0\...
/
I
-r-
/
/
/
/
/
/
.....
/
,/
/
\
\
"
,
"
"
\
"
, /
.......--/
PI'
<r
-,
I
I
I
,
I
\
\
~d\
\
\
\
\
\N
I~
I
I
,
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
\
\
\
,
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
POND
YATER 1U'I.-alllJ.B
....
...
/'~~
/'
/.....---{:~
I ~
I
I
/
...
"
,
,
\ SOUTH UNE OF ThE SOUTH HALF OF
THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF
SEe 32.
'"
~ 348
- 89
8- '.
\
~
\ I
\ :
II :
, \
_1.5,__.1.
~
- - - - - - - -;- - ~ \.
~., - - -'-"
_ __ -=--=- ~ _ ~ _DISf SPtM _ ~
"
....N89.48'08''W
" -0- _ _ _ - - - [' -- - - -- - - --- 420.55
--. =-=- __ ~ _ _ _ al.cua..- =-- ~ ~ ~
213TH
STREET
y7cr
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT
GLENVIEW COMMERCIAL ADDITION
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 17th
day of March, 2003 at 7:00 P.M.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
introduced and Member _ seconded the following:
Member
WHEREAS, an application meeting City requirements has been filed seeking final plat
review and approval of Glenview Commercial Addition; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the preliminary plat on
the 14th day of January, 2003, preceded by 10 days' published and mailed notice, at
which all persons desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon;
and
WHEREAS; the City Council reviewed the final plat on March 17,2003; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be
feasibly served by municipal service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above final plat be approved and
that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat with
the following conditions:
1. Existing drainage and utility easements (as shown on the attached exhibit) shall be
vacated prior to final approval.
2. The Engineering Division shall approve construction plans for grading, storm water
and utilities.
3. Execution of a Development Contract between the Developer and the City of
Farmington and submission of security, payment of all fees and cost and submission
of all other documents required under the Development Contract.
This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session
on the 1 ih day of March, 2003.
<./q-o
Attested to the _ day of March, 2003.
(SEAL)
Mayor
City Administrator
'/<6'1
r-
File NQme: \ \Probe\ProjDwgs\Orowlngs\TCCONST\GlENVlEW TH\F -Plo\\F -PLAT.dwg
l
1-
~~
....C
OZ
"IfTI
~~
';r
~fTI
Z
o
~
I\) ~
o
CU "I
-l ~
I
(f)
--I
:u
/i1
III
--I
-:D
nZ::D
~ OGlO
~Za>
11\11\
"1>>11\
B ::D:II
z-
-cZ
- Gl
~ ~ il
~
~ it
~ I
~
~
rO-- - - - -- -- - - - ---- - - - -- -- - 0_ - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - - -- --- -- - - - - - ---- - - - - - -- - --- - -- - -~IJ \~ -711.ZI- _ ~I
101 ~_~_______ _~~.!~~~K_~I~~!~~~,?:~~C~~~!:~E~~~~~~N~~~________J ~ SO'Z7'3Z'W
I - -t- - - --407.00 SOI'29'05'W-- 0-1
I _2.___ =c=- - - - - - _
! I ---- --~------II---(~_____________________Ol! 25
I \ I
I ,,,,;\ I
l ,-.. ~Tl I \..-;/ II c:r?
I )'" ...... (;" r-- I .
....../ r--.> "(") , -I .
(:':.. (") ~-:-., I' r-- fj
,...,,1 r-- n I.... I 0 CD..,)
, , ...'\ I --i ~c.i
(") /~ , \ \ I ...q
~~ I \~ II l> OS
I If
I 25
-0
~
l2::
~&
It.
0"01
CDOI
-l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10 I
e\
.. t\'t-'i-
(....) T 1\ T t'=
... ~",--
T r::l I J ~I I t.{
r,t ""1\
I.i · ,-.. I-i \M 1\ 'y'
I I 1.;1 I n~"
~\ I ,-. ':2
I II '.,,,, 1,)
(CH IPPENDALE A VENUE)
C -WEST LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
\ NW 1/4 OF SEC. J2
N00"27'32"E
8Q4.20
~
l\ ------::------------
~~~~~--- . 0
.''!-: I
",// P
// I
// ~
/ I
, <,
/><9/'"
/
/
/
...<;.'.~/'
tt~~!J~
""....
-.--
3ZUlll
o
Ii
~
\
~
t:l
~
~
~TH STR!l~ - ---1!Q!l'~3i1- - - - -r
I 320.70 ~
til l!:~
~r
OUTLOT ~ ~~
J .7 / ~.03
500.27'32"1'
391.38
~
,-,
1 I
...
(-\
......
......,~
~-.
......
"'1~
~-.
......
...'\
, , \
\
,1' '"",
1-
,
(-,
...
,..-\
..../
....
~-,
~-
....../
(:."
~.
....,
,)...
(-\
...../
-- -;-'
~-.
,..
...'\
, \ \
\
( I)
....1
at
~
, I
I \ I
I "
I
~~>
"'!!Ie
zc~
:ez-o
_fTl~
.....0
....."
~;r~
Ul"'..
Plg~
l3-;r
~fTI
~
500018'42"1'
200.81
"'-l--'"
"... ....,
I/~~ ~~ \
I f;; ....c; ....:' \ t:l
{ ~~ /?":. ~.~ , ~
,
\
,-..
)"
~..,
\
,--
I 0 .
02 CUll I
r:l
-< ~a ~I-
I I li ~;o "'
~! n ~in!i! i;l~ le~ N
Z f:. ~- ~
I l I ~~ 52
r - - - -- -1- --- --T - - - -- ~
I i~1 i~M~~! L i! ~~ i!2~ ~
r--!--~- ?!: I ~S Kl-
- ih~;~ to ~o ... ~
1\S'~i I~~I . z
- >- 10 i~
;"" wi z
'1:l ~ !~ i a lD:J: C
~ l_____-{______! _ _ ___ __n_J ~ !il- l:
I I ~ I I I ~
L_l~-'-_ ~I iii -~
n 8Z
1'1 0
- S:~ C
lQ Z Z
C 0
I:
g
W
ii'
5"
t;
~'k
-I'
I
I
!
~
"I
~Kli
~f'>()
~l3!6
,.." z
()~!il
g:oo
~:~
()" fTI
~~~
~ .....
iD....
o
"I
I
\
\
i'~
\
\
Q
t-t
t:Ej
Z
<
........
t:E:j
~
n
o
~
~
t:Ej
~
n
.......
>
t-t
>
tj
tj
........
1-3
........
o
Z
~
lOb
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO: Mayor, Council Members, t-
City Administrator ~ \<.~
FROM: Jim Atkinson
Assistant City Planner
SUBJECT: Consider Zoning Map Amendment for the Tower View Apartments
DATE: March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
The City of Farmington is seeking approval to amend the Zoning Map for the Tower View
Apartments located at the southeast corner of Division Street and Walnut Street from R-4
(Medium/High Density Residential) to R-5 (High Density Residential).
DISCUSSION
In the spring of 2002, the City initiated a rezoning of the property from R-2 (Low/Medium
Density Residential) to R-4 (Medium/High Density Residential) in order to bring the apartment
building into compliance with the density requirements established in the Zoning Code. The
number of units existing in the building was greater than the maximum allowed in the R-2
District, making the apartments nonconforming. The R-4 designation was determined to be
appropriate to bring the property into compliance with the Code.
After further review of the property, it has been determined that the property remains
nonconforming in the R-4 zoning district. The maximum density allowed in the R-4 District is
12 units per acre. The property consists of 1.31 acres and includes 27 units, which equals
approximately 21 units per acre. The proposed R-5 district requires at least 14 units per acre
and therefore would be the correct zoning classification for this property.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning Commission reviewed the zoning map amendment at their meeting on March 11,
2003 and unanimously recommended approval.
ACTION REQUESTED
Consider approval of a Zoning Map Amendment for the Tower View Apartments from R-4
(Medium/High Density Residential) to R-5 (High Density Residential).
Respectfully Submitted,
1~~
Jim Atkinson
Assistant City Planner
'-/9:3
.
Zoni ng Map
W = I I 1 LL
.J
~
I j
! f i
j .
i i
! j , u
j I
j 1 I
I j
;
j i
; I j I
, I I I
t I
I I I
! ! I
1 ,
, , i I I I
i R-Tl
.... I
cu I
, ~ I I
; .... I I i
v,'
s::
<:) I , I
'<:; i I I
:~ J'I_ ._P'l I !
C .- -
;
Walnut Street
R-2 :
i ;
Rezone R-4 .... .~
cu
~
....
v,
; to R-5 .... I
'"
{ - L
i
l i 1
i
-
R-D j t
t
I I
i ,
I
!
R-2 , I I
,
~ !
I
, t ~ J
,
f .
. i
j
-, ! !
.! t ~ I
,
; , ;
,
~ ! ;
f
i j j I
.
l H
I 1
t 1 J ,
. ,
I j j . j
c./crcf
IOe,
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651)463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
FROM:
Mayor, Council Members, KfX!--
City Administrator ~
John Powers
Fire Marshal
TO:
SUBJECT:
Ordinance Adding Title 5, Chapter 5 to the Farmington City Code
Regarding the Sale, Possession, and Use of Consumer Fireworks
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
The City of Farmington proposes to add Title 5, Chapter 5 to the Farmington City
Code to establish standards for the sale, possession, and use of consumer fireworks.
The Code does not currently include provisions for fireworks.
DISCUSSION
As provided in the proposed ordinance, the purpose of adding provisions regulating
the sale and use of fireworks is to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the
general public. The following findings of fact are included in the ordinance:
(a) consumer fireworks contain pyrotechnic chemical compositions that are
combustible; accordingly, the unregulated accumulation, storage, display
and sale of these items present a fire safety hazard.
(b) the improper disposal of consumer fireworks presents environmental
hazards.
(c) regular inspection, sampling and testing of the consumer fireworks being
offered for sale is necessary to assure compliance with the limitations set
forth in Minnesota Statutes 5624.20, subd. 1 (c), as to chemical content.
(d) regular police inspections are necessary to prevent the sale of these
materials to minors.
(e) regular inspections by the City Fire Marshal are necessary to prevent
improper display, storage and disposal of consumer fireworks.
(f) accurate information concerning the addresses and locations of persons
dealing in permitted consumer fireworks in the City is necessary to
facilitate the inspection of the premises for compliance with necessary
safety regulations and performance standards and to assist the City in
responding to any emergency situation arising out of or adjacent to this
business.
L/C?'5
The proposed ordinance would require a permit prior to manufacturing, storing, or
selling fireworks within the City of Farmington. The Fire Marshal would review all
permit applications to determine whether the conditions required in the proposed
ordinance have been satisfied. The proposed ordinance also includes provisions
regulating the general use of fireworks.
Permit Fee
The 2003 fee schedule does not currently include a fee for the manufacturing,
storage, or sale of fireworks. The appropriate fee for this type of permit is currently
under review and will be presented to the Council for their consideration at a regular
Council meeting in April. Once adopted, the fee would be included in the schedule of
charges and fees provided by the City of Farmington.
ACTION REQUESTED
Consider the proposed ordinance adding Title 5, Chapter 5 to the City Code regarding
the sale, possession, and use of consumer fireworks.
Respectfully Submitted,
~
John Powers
Fire Marshal
Attachments:
Proposed Fireworks Ordinance
Supplemental Application for the Sale of Permitted Consumer Fireworks
Information for Consumers of Fireworks
Fireworks Safety Guidelines
'1~&
CITY OF FARMINGTON
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING TITLE 5, CHAPTER 5 TO THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE
REGARDING THE SALE, POSSESSION, AND USE OF CONSUMER FIREWORKS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Title 5 of the Farmington City Code is amended to add the
following:
5-5-1: ADOPTION OF STATE LAW
The provisions of Minnesota statutes sections 624.20 through 624.25,
inclusive, are adopted by reference.
5-5-2: PURPOSE AND FINDINGS
The purpose of this Division is to regulate the sale of permitted consumer
fireworks in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the general
public. The City Council makes the following findings regarding the need to
license and regulate the sale, distribution, storage, and display of fireworks
permitted under State law:
(a) consumer fireworks contain pyrotechnic chemical compositions that
are combustible; accordingly, the unregulated accumulation,
storage, display and sale of these items present a fire safety hazard.
(b) the improper disposal of consumer fireworks presents environmental
hazards.
(c) regular inspection, sampling and testing of the consumer fireworks
being offered for sale is necessary to assure compliance with the
limitations set forth in Minnesota Statutes 5624.20, subd. 1 (c), as to
chemical content.
(d) regular police inspections are necessary to prevent the sale of these
materials to minors.
(e) regular inspections by the City Fire Marshal are necessary to prevent
improper display, storage and disposal of consumer fireworks.
(f) accurate information concerning the addresses and locations of
persons dealing in permitted consumer fireworks in the City is
necessary to facilitate the inspection of the premises for compliance
with necessary safety regulations and performance standards and to
'1~/
assist the City in responding to any emergency situation arising out of
or adjacent to this business.
5-5-3: PERMIT REQUIRED
No person, without securing a permit from the City of Farmington, shall do
any of the following:
1. Manufacture, store, or sell consumer fireworks;
2. Make a public display of fireworks.
5-5-4: DEFINITIONS
The following word is defined as:
CONSUMER FIREWORKS: Wire or wood sparklers of not more than one
hundred grams (100 g) of mixture per item, other sparkling items which
are nonexplosive and non aerial and contain seventy five grams (75 g) or
less of chemical mixture per tube or a total of two hundred grams (200
g) or less for multiple tubes, snakes and glowworms, smoke devices, or
trick noisemakers which include paper streamers, party poppers, string
poppers, snappers, and drop pops, each consisting of not more than
twenty-five hundredths grains of explosive mixture.
5-5-5: PERMIT APPLICATION
The application for the permit for the manufacturing, storage, and sale of
consumer fireworks shall be made to the Fire Marshal. A determination by
the Fire Marshal that the location where consumer fireworks are to be
stored or sold is not hazardous to property or endangers any person and that
the persons in charge of selling or storing the consumer fireworks are
competent and trained to handle such consumer fireworks must be made
prior to processing the application. The application for permit shall be
accompanied by a letter from the owner of the property on which the sale
is to take place. Such letter shall grant permission to the applicant for the
use of the property. The application shall include a floor plan designating
the area for manufacturing, storage or display along with a list documenting
the name, weight, and quantity of consumer fireworks within the building
and be accompanied by the material safety data sheets. Applications must
be made a minimum of ten (10) days prior to operating. Any permit granted
hereunder shall be nontransferable.
y~
5-5-6: LICENSE PERIOD AND PERMIT FEE
Licenses shall be issued for a calendar year. Permit fees shall not be
prorated. The fee for the permit shall be that as provided in the current
city fee schedule.
5-5-7: REVOCATION OF LICENSE
Following written notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the Fire Marshal
may revoke a license for violation of this chapter or state law concerning
the sale, use, or possession of fireworks. If a license is revoked, neither the
applicant nor the licensed premises may obtain a license for twelve (12)
months. If the Fire Marshal revokes a license, the license holder may within
ten (10) days appeal the decision to the City Council.
5-5-8: TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
A permit for manufacturing, storage, or retail sale of consumer fireworks
shall be issued only upon the following terms and conditions:
(A) Neither the applicant nor the responsible party for the permit shall
have been convicted of a felony, or a fire/fireworks related
misdemeanor within three (3) years of the date of filing of the
application. A criminal background check will be conducted on the
permit holder.
(6) Transient sales of consumer fireworks are prohibited. No
manufacturing, sales or storage for commercial use shall occur on
residentially zoned property or properties used for educational
purposes or assemblies or property used for the dispensing of motor
fuels. Sales of consumer fireworks are prohibited in movable places
of business, including without limitation, mobile sales made from
motorized vehicles, mobile sales kiosks, tents, non-permanent
stands or trailers.
(C) Consumer firework manufacturing, storage or sales areas shall
provide approved "no smoking" signs in red letters not less than two
inches (2") in height on white background. All signs shall be
maintained in legible condition.
(D) Smoking and the discharge of consumer fireworks shall be prohibited
within one hundred feet (100') of any building in which fireworks are
manufactured, stored or sold.
(E) Each permit holder shall have not less than two (2) water type or
equivalent extinguishers of not less than two and one-half (2 1/2)
gallon capacity.
(F) The premises must be in compliance with the state building code
and state fire code. There shall be at least two (2) exits from all
buildings from which fireworks are manufactured, stored or sold.
'I9f9
(G) In buildings without an approved automatic sprinkler system retail
consumer fireworks indoor sales displays shall be limited to fifty (50)
pounds (net) pyrotechnic composition or two hundred (200) pounds
gross weight, if the pyrotechnic composition weight is not known.
(H) Buildings protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler
system shall be limited to one hundred (100) pounds net or four
hundred (400) pounds gross weight if the pyrotechnic composition
weight is not known.
(I) All facilities that obtain a permit shall post in a conspicuous location
a list of all consumer fireworks displayed and stored on the
property. The list shall document the name, weight, and quantity of
the fireworks and be accompanied by the material safety data
sheets. Upon request samples of the fireworks shall be made
available to the fire marshal for testing.
(J) Manufacturing, warehouse buildings, or retail in excess of the
quantities listed in subsections (G) and (H) of this section for retail
consumer fireworks shall be classified as an H occupancy with
explosives and aerosols.
(K) At the point of sale, only "inert" or "dummy" displays may be
accessible to the purchaser.
(L) Photo identification must be checked with each sale. Purchasers
must be eighteen (18) years of age or older.
(M) The sale of consumer fireworks must be allowed by the zoning
ordinance and must comply with all zoning ordinance requirements
including signs.
(N) The premises are subject to inspection by city employees including
police officers, fire and building officials during normal business
hours.
(0) Safety information approved by the Farmington Fire Department
must be distributed with each sale of consumer fireworks.
5-5-9: DISCHARGE RULES AND REGULATIONS
(A) It is unlawful to use, fire, or discharge consumer fireworks along the
route of and during any parade or at any place of public assembly or
in any business zoning district.
(B) It is unlawful at any time to throw or toss consumer fireworks at any
person, animal, vehicle or other thing or object.
(C) Smoking and the discharge of consumer fireworks shall be prohibited
within one hundred feet (100') of any building or stand in which
fireworks are sold at retail or stored after hours.
(D) Consumer fireworks may only be discharged in an area with a water
source connected to a hose or other acceptable means of putting
out a fire.
(E) The Fire Chief may ban fireworks displays and the use of consumer
fireworks if a drought is evident.
<-/90
(F) Juveniles may not possess consumer fireworks unless under the
direct supervision of a responsible adult.
5-5-10: PUBLIC DISPLAY
The public display of fireworks shall require a permit issued by the Fire
Marshal in accordance with Minnesota statutes section 624.22.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage
and publication according to law.
ADOPTED this
Farmington.
day of
, 2003, by the City Council of the City of
CITY OF FARMINGTON
By:
Gerald Ristow, Mayor
A TrEST:
By:
City Administrator
SEAL
By:
City Attorney
. - Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of
, 2003.
~91
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street
Farmington, MN 55024
Fire Marshal's Office (651) 463-1840 Fax (651) 463-1611
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR THE SALE OF
PERMITTED CONSUl\1ER FIREWORKS
Business Information
1. Type of Applicant: 0 Individual 0 Corporation 0 Partnership 0 Other Organizations
2. Legal Name of Licensee:
3. Business Name:
4. Business Address:
5. Business Phone:
Business Fax:
Person in Chan!:e of the Licensed Premises
Provide the following information on the person in charge of the licensed premises:
1. Full Name:
Date of Birth
2. Address:
Phone:
Premises
1. Does applicant own the building where the licensed business will be located? 0 Yes 0 No
2. If the building where the licensed business will be located is owned by someone other that the
applicant, provide the following:
Name of Building Owner:
Business Address of Building Owner
3. State the hours of operation for the sale of permitted consumer fireworks at the licensed premises:
ATTACHMENTS
A. Attach a letter from the property owner giving the applicant (lessee) permission to sell consumer fIreworks
from the leased premises.
B. Attach a detailed site plan illustrating and describing the proposed sales and storage areas, both on-site and
off-site, covered by the license, identify customer parking availability, and provide specifIc location
information for any off-site storage.
\\F A-FS I \COMMDEV\Fire\Fire Applications\Fireworks application.doc
t.f9~
Information for Consumers of Fireworks
Each state in the United States has slightly different requirements for fireworks: some permit
all lAG consumer fireworks; others a subset of consumer fireworks; or no fireworks at all.
The recent law change would allow some, but not all, consumer fireworks to be sold and
used in Minnesota. To prevent confusion, the Table on the back of this fact sheet outlines the
types of fireworks that may now be sold, possessed and used by the public. This table also
indicates fireworks that are still not legal to sell, possess and use, except with a permit and by
a certified operator. Here is a summary of the basic rules for fireworks in Minnesota:
~ Only non-explosive and non-aerial consumer fireworks are permitted to be sold,
possessed and used.
~ Fireworks that explode, leave the ground, or shoot anything other than sparks into
the air are still prohibited.
~ Use of these devices is not permitted on public property (i.e. parks, roads, alleys,
schools, government property etc.).
>- Purchasers of fireworks must be at least 18 years old and age must be verified by
photo identification at the time of purchase. The only age restriction is on the
purchase of fireworks - there is no age restriction on possession or use.
,. Consumer fireworks may NOT be used on public property (i.e. Parks, roads, alleys,
schools).
>- There are no restrictions on the time of year for the sale, possession or use of these
fireworks, nor are there restrictions on where the fireworks are purchased (in state or
out of state).
A permit is required from the Farmington Fire Department for the sale of fireworks.
, There has been no change in the laws relating to theatrical pyrotechnics and the
requirements for a permit and certified operator according to Minnesota Statute
624.20 to 624.25
>- Operating outside the exception provided by Minnesota Statute 624.20 (c) for sale,
possession and use of fireworks is addressed in the criminal statutes of Minnesota Statute
624.20 to 624.25. According to Minnesota Statute 624.25, violations are addressed as
follows:
1. If the violation involves explosive flreworks in an amount of 35 pounds gross
container weight or more, to imprisonment for not more than one year. or to payment
of a fine of not more than $3.000. or both;
2. If the violation involves explosive fireworks in an amount of less than 35 pounds gross
container weight, to imprisonment for not more than 90 days. or to payment of a fine
of not more than $700, or both; and
3. If the violation involves any amount of fireworks other than e.;'Cplosive fireworks, to
imprisonment jor not more than 90 days, or to payment of a jine of not more than
$700, or both.
'/93
Fireworks Safety Guidelines
Fireworks are associated with many injuries nationally each year. The following safety
guidelines are offered to reduce fireworks injuries, fires and nuisance complaints:
~ Read, understand and follow the instructions on each device prior to using.
~ Use fireworks with close adult supervision.
~ Choose a safe place to use fireworks that is far from anything that could be damaged
from the normal or abnormal operation of any device. Fireworks should only be ignited
outdoors and away from animals, buildings, storage tanks, brush or combustible
materials.
~ Anyone acting in an irresponsible manner or who appears to be under the influence of
alcohol or other drugs should not handle or discharge fireworks.
~ Keep fireworks away from small children and store them in a cool dry location away
from sources of ignition (heat and thmes). Fireworks should not be allowed to become
wet and should not be used when dried after becoming wet.
>- Do not carry fireworks in your pocket or on your person.
~ Lit cigarettes, cigars, pipes or open flames should be kept away from fireworks that are
for sale or when stored.
>- Never ignite fireworks inside another container, such as inside a bottle or can.
>- Eye protection is recommended for those using tireworks. Never throw fireworks or aim
them at another person. animal or building.
>- Only light one firework device at a time, then move away from the device quickly. Keep
clear of any device that has been ignited, but has yet to go off.
~ If a firework device has been ignited but fails to go off, stay clear of the device for an
extended period of time to prevent injury due to delayed activation. Soak the device in
water before handling it.
~ Never place any part of your body, especially your head, over the firework device when
lighting. Approach the item from the side and light while keeping your body away from
the item.
~ Never relight malfunctioning fireworks. Report any defects back to the seller or the
Consumer Product Safety Commission.
>- Never experiment with fireworks, make your own fireworks, or alter fireworks in any
manner (a strong federal prohibition exists for such activity).
c.f9t/
lOci
City of Farmington
325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024
(651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591
www.ci.farmington.mn.us
TO:
Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator
FROM:
Robin Roland, Finance Director
SUBJECT:
City Hall Task Force Workshop
DATE:
March 17, 2003
INTRODUCTION
After presentation of the final report of the City Hall Task Force at the March 3,
2003 meeting, the members of the City Council indicated they would like to
schedule a workshop with the Task Force to discuss in depth the findings
presented.
DISCUSSION
Staff has contacted members of the Task Force and asked about their
availability for the workshop meeting. The preferred date appears to be
Wednesday, April 30, 2003 with the alternative date of Wednesday, April 16,
2003.
ACTION REQUIRED
Schedule workshop with the City Hall Task Force on Wednesday April 30, 2003
at 6:00 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
$~
Robin Roland
Finance Director
'-195