Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05.18.26 Council Packet
Meeting Location: Farmington City Hall, Council Chambers 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Monday, May 18, 2026 12:00 AM Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVE AGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS 5.1. Swearing in of Fire Department Personnel Conduct the Oaths of Office and Badge Pinning Ceremony for Lieutenants Mary Olson and Justin Kelly Agenda Item: Swearing in of Fire Department Personnel - Pdf 5 6. CONSENT AGENDA 6.1. Dakota County Joint Powers Agreement for Post-Election Review Services Agenda Item: Dakota County Joint Powers Agreement for Post-Election Review Services - Pdf 6 - 12 6.2. Minutes of the May 4, 2026 City Council Work Session Agenda Item: Minutes of the May 4, 2026 City Council Work Session - Pdf 13 - 15 6.3. Minutes of the May 4, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Item: Minutes of the May 4, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting - Pdf 16 - 22 6.4. Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for Farmington Municipal Liquors June 25, 2026 Agenda Item: Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for Farmington Municipal Liquors June 25, 2026 - Pdf 23 - 24 Page 1 of 454 6.5. Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for The Rotary Club of Farmington June 26-28, 2026 Agenda Item: Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for The Rotary Club of Farmington June 26-28, 2026 - Pdf 25 - 26 6.6. Payment of Claims Agenda Item: Payment of Claims - Pdf 27 - 28 Payment of Claims 6.7. Increase the Annual Fire Relief Benefit Level Agenda Item: Increase the Annual Fire Relief Benefit Level - Pdf 29 6.8. Memorandum of Agreement for AFSCME Clerical, Technical, Professional Local #3815 - Accounting Specialist Agenda Item: Memorandum of Agreement for AFSCME Clerical, Technical, Professional Local #3815 - Accounting Specialist - Pdf 30 - 32 6.9. Staff Approvals and Recommendations Agenda Item: Staff Approvals and Recommendations - Pdf 33 6.10. Declaring Items as Surplus and Authorizing Disposal (Parks and Recreation) Agenda Item: Declaring Items as Surplus and Authorizing Disposal (Parks and Recreation) - Pdf 34 - 35 6.11. Donation from David McKnight to the Rambling River Center Agenda Item: Donation from David McKnight to the Rambling River Center - Pdf 36 - 37 6.12. Donation from the Farmington VFW Post 7662 to the City of Farmington Agenda Item: Donation from the Farmington VFW Post 7662 to the City of Farmington - Pdf 38 - 39 6.13. Playground Equipment for Prairieview Park Agenda Item: Playground Equipment for Prairieview Park - Pdf 40 - 50 6.14. Donation from Beans & Boots LLC to the Farmington Police Department K9 program Agenda Item: Donation from Beans & Boots LLC to the Farmington Police Department K9 program - Pdf 51 - 52 6.15. Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for the Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study Agenda Item: Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for the Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study - Pdf 53 - 72 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.1. Ordinance Amending Charges and Fees for Licenses, Permits, or Other City Approvals and Services for Calendar Year 2026 Hold a public hearing and consider passing Ordinance 2026-004 Page 2 of 454 Amending Charges and Fees for Licenses, Permits, or Other City Approvals and Services for Calendar Year 2026. 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT 9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 9.1. Adopt Ordinance 2026-005 Rezoning Property from MUCI (Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial) to I (Industrial); the Subject Property is Generally located at the Northeast Intersection of Pilot Knob Road and 208th Street West Adopt Ordinance 2026-005 Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the Farmington Zoning Ordinance, Rezoning the western 553 feet of the Parcel with PID Number 14-02500-57-011 from MUCI (Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial) to I (Industrial). Agenda Item: Adopt Ordinance 2026-005 Rezoning Property from MUCI (Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial) to I (Industrial); the Subject Property is General - Pdf 73 - 80 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 11.1. Consideration of Acceptance of Bid for Sale of Single-Family Lot on 19799 Embers Avenue Parcel ID: 14-56801-01-010 Approve a motion to accept the bid for the sale of the City-owned single- family lot on Embers Avenue and authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute all necessary documents to complete the sale. Agenda Item: Resolution 2026-047 Accepting an Offer and Authorizing the Sale of Property Located at 19799 Embers Avenue Parcel ID: 14- 56801-01-010 - Pdf 81 - 84 11.2. Pass Resolution 2026-046 Adopting Findings of Fact and Record Decision on the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet Pass Resolution 2026-046 Adopting Findings of Fact and Record Decision on the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Agenda Item: Pass Resolution 2026-046 Adopting Findings of Fact and Record Decision on the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet - Pdf 85 - 452 11.3. Planning Commission Appointment Approve the appointment of Nate Lehmeyer to the Planning Commission to fill the vacant seat through January 2028. 453 - 454 Page 3 of 454 Agenda Item: Planning Commission Appointment - Pdf 12. CITIZENS COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (This time is reserved for citizen comments regarding non-agenda items. No official action can be taken on these items. Speakers are limited to five minutes to address the city council during citizen comment time.) 13. CITY COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN Page 4 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Matt Price, Fire Chief Department: Fire Subject: Swearing in of Fire Department Personnel Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Conducting the Oaths of Office and Badge Pinning for two Lieutenants promotion. DISCUSSION: Oaths of Office and Badge pinning for the two Lieutenants. The two Lieutenants are: Mary Olson Justin Kelly The Oath of Office will be administered by Fire Chief Matthew Price ACTION REQUESTED: Conduct the Oaths of Office and Badge Pinning Ceremony for Lieutenants Mary Olson and Justin Kelly Page 5 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Melissa Geis, City Clerk Department: Administration Subject: Dakota County Joint Powers Agreement for Post-Election Review Services Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: For City Council approval is the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) Between Dakota County and the City of Farmington for Post Election Review Services. DISCUSSION: Following each state general election, counties are required to conduct a post-election review (PER) under Minnesota Statute 206.89. This public review involves a manual hand count of ballots from precincts selected by lot and must be completed within 14 days after the election. To streamline administration and ensure accurate, transparent, and consistent procedures, Dakota County would like to provide the election judges who will conduct the post- election review across all selected precincts, rather than having each municipality recruit and utilize their own judges. Using county election judges will help maintain uniform standards, party balance, and efficiency during the review process. The City Attorney has reviewed the Joint Powers Agreement and found it acceptable. BUDGET IMPACT: Dakota County will invoice the City if selected for post-election review actual costs incurred for review based on the salary of election judge(s) conducting the post-election review. If the City is not selected for post-election review, there are no costs. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the Joint Powers Agreement Between Dakota County and the City of Farmington for Post-Election Review Services. ATTACHMENTS: JPA Dakota County for Post-Election Review Page 6 of 454 Dakota County Contract No. DCA31484 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN DAKOTA COUNTY AND _______City of Farmington______________________ FOR CONDUCT OF THE POST-ELECTION REVIEW This is a Joint Powers Agreement (“Agreement”) between City of Farmington___________ (“Municipality”) and the County of Dakota (“County”), 1590 Highway 55, Hastings, MN 55033, entered into pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.59, for conduct of the post-election review (PER) as required by Minn. Stat. § 206.89 after every state general election. Municipality and County are referred to individually as the “Party” and are collectively referred to as the “Parties”. Recitals WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 206.89 requires a postelection review of the state general election by a manual count of the ballots used in the selected precincts and must be performed in the manner provided by Minn Stat § 204C.21; and WHEREAS, at the canvass of the state primary, the Dakota County Canvassing Board must set the date, time, and place for the postelection review of the state general election; and WHEREAS, at the canvass of the state general election, the Dakota County Canvassing Board must select the precincts to be reviewed by lot and include three percent of the total number of precincts in the County; and WHEREAS, the postelection review must not begin before the ninth day after the state general election and must be complete no later than the 14th day after the state general election; and WHEREAS, the Dakota County Canvassing Board appoints the postelection review official, which is generally the County Election Director; and WHEREAS, the costs of the postelection review in the selected precincts are allocated to the governing body responsible for each precinct selected for review pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 206.89, subd. 9; WHEREAS, the Parties desire efficient use of resources for the coordination, scheduling and performance of postelection reviews; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein and subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 471.59, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1 Term And Renewal 1. The term of this Agreement shall commence when all signatures of the Parties are obtained and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 2027, subject to automatic renewals. Beginning January 1, 2028, this Agreement will automatically renewal each even calendar year for a two-year term, unless terminated as provided in Section 2 of this Agreement. Page 7 of 454 Page 2 of 6 Section 2 Agreement Termination 2. This Agreement may be terminated as follows: 2.1. Participation in this Agreement may be terminated without cause either Party upon at least 90 days’ written notice to the other Party. Notice of termination shall be sent as provided in Section 12 of this Agreement. 2.2. Termination of this Agreement does not discharge any liability, responsibility, or right of the Parties that may arise from the performance of, or failure to adequately perform the provisions of this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination, such as payment of an invoice for services satisfactorily performed prior to the effective date of termination. Termination of the Agreement does not discharge any obligation of the terminating Party, which, by its nature, would survive after the date of termination. Section 3 Post-Election Review 3.1 The County shall conduct the post-election review of the state general elections in the County as defined by Minn. Stat. § 206.89. The review shall be conducted in accordance with all applicable Minnesota laws as well as any additional information or guidance the State provides. 3.2 In order to ensure efficient scheduling and organization, the post-election review will be conducted by the post-election review official, assisted by election judges designated by the post-election review official for this purpose. The party-balance requirement under Minn. Stat § 204B.19 applies to election judges designated for the post-election review. Any election judge that is appointed pursuant to this section shall be hired, scheduled, and paid by the County. 3.3 At the conclusion of the general election canvass, the County will contact the municipalities that have one or more precincts selected for review (collectively, the “PER Municipalities” or, individually, the “PER Municipality”) and request all ballots in possession of the municipality. 3.4 The PER Municipalities will arrange to have all ballots for the selected precinct(s) in the custody of the PER Municipality delivered to the County at the location chosen by the Dakota County Canvasing Board as soon as practicable in advance of the post-election review. The ballots shall be securely stored by the County until the post-election review and the ballots shall be returned to the municipality at the conclusion of the post-election review. 3.5 Postelection reviews are conducted in a public location. Clerks and/or their deputies are invited to attend the post-election review and witness the process as it is completed for their precinct(s). Section 4 Applicability 4. This Agreement between the County and the Municipality is limited to the post-election review as required by Minn. Stat. § 206.89. All other voting processes are outside of the scope of this Agreement. Page 8 of 454 Page 3 of 6 Section 5 Payment and Invoicing 5. If one or more precincts in the Municipality is selected for postelection review, the Municipality shall pay for the actual costs incurred for the review based on the hourly salary of each election judge performing the review of the Municipality’s precinct(s). The County will invoice the Municipality its actual cost of conducting the post-election review. Any invoice submitted to the Municipality shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to the Municipality. The County will not invoice the Municipality for non-election judge costs, including other County expenses associated with the review. Municipalities that are not selected for precincts in the post-election review will pay no costs in relation to the services provided under this Agreement. Section 6 Independent Contractor 6. It is agreed that nothing in this Agreement is intended or should be construed as creating the relationship of agents, partners, joint ventures, or associates between the Parties hereto or as constituting the County or the Municipality as the employee of the other entity for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. The County is an independent contractor and neither it, its employees, agents, nor its representatives are employees of the Municipality, for any purpose. From any amounts due the County, there shall be no deductions for federal income tax or FICA payments, nor for any state income tax, nor for any other purposes which are associated with an employer-employee relationship unless required by law. Section 7 Data Practices 7. All data created, collected, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (“Act”), any other applicable statute, or any rules adopted to implement the Act or statute, as well as any state or federal statutes and regulations on data privacy and election data. Section 8 No Waiver 8. No delay or omission by the Parties to exercise any right or power occurring upon any noncompliance or default with respect to any of the terms of this Agreement shall not impair any such right or power or be construed to be a waiver thereof unless the same is consented to in writing. A waiver by the County or the Municipality of any of the covenants, conditions, or agreements to be observed by the Parties shall not be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach or of any covenant, condition, or agreement herein contained. All remedies provided for in this Agreement shall be cumulative and in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies available to the Parties at law, in equity, or otherwise. Section 9 Governing Law 9. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Any action commenced pursuant to this Agreement must be venued in Dakota County District Court. Page 9 of 454 Page 4 of 6 Section 10 Entire Agreement 10. It is understood and agreed, as to the subject matter of this Agreement, that the entire Agreement between the Parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the Parties relating to the subject matter and hereby rescinds and replaces all prior agreements with the respective Governmental Entities with this Agreement. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the Parties hereto. Section 11 No Assignment 11. The Parties may not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement, either in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other Party and any attempt to do so shall be void and have no force and effect. Section 12 Notice 12. Any notice or demand shall be in writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail to the other party addressed as follows: To the Municipality: City/Town Clerk City of Farmington 430 Third St. Farmington, MN 55024 To the County: Dakota County Elections Director 1590 Highway 55 Hastings MN 55033 Section 13 Audit Provision 13. The Parties agree that the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the respective Parties and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained, and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of this Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. Section 14 Liability, Indemnification and Insurance 14. Each Party shall be solely liable for the acts of its elected officials, officers, employees, or agents and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other Party to this Agreement, their elected officials, officers, employees, or agents. Page 10 of 454 Page 5 of 6 a. The provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 and other applicable laws govern liability of the Parties. To the full extent permitted by law, actions by the Parties, their respective officers, employees, and agents pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as a “cooperative activity.” It is the intent of the Parties that they shall be deemed a “single governmental unit” for the purpose of liability as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, subd. 1a(b). For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, subd, 1a(a), it is the intent that this Agreement does not create any liability or exposure to the Parties for the acts or omissions of the other Party or other individual governmental entities participating in a PER. b. The County agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Municipality and its officials, agents, and employees, from any liability, loss, or damages the Municipality may suffer or incur as a result of demands, claims, judgments, or costs arising out of or caused by the County in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement. c. Municipality agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify the County and its officials, agents, and employees, from any liability, loss, or damages the County may suffer or incur as a result of demands, claims, judgments, or costs arising out of or caused by its performance of its respective obligations under this Agreement. d. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed nor operate as a waiver of any applicable limitation of liability, defenses, immunities, or exceptions by statute or common law, nor does it impose or imply responsibility for the acts or omissions of the County or Municipality. The County and the Municipality warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnification requirements and have sufficient insurance coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. Section 15 Survival of Provisions 15. It is expressly understood and agreed that Sections 8, 10, 14 and 15 hereof shall survive the completion of performance and termination or cancellation of this Agreement. Section 16 Authority 16. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Municipality and County represent that they are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Municipality and the County and represent and warrant that this Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation and is enforceable in accordance with its terms. Each Party agrees that the electronic signatures of the Parties included in this Agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as wet ink signatures. Page 11 of 454 Page 6 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have hereunto set their hands. COUNTY OF DAKOTA By: Director, Elections Dated: CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Nicholas Lien, Its Mayor Dated: May 18, 2026 By: Melissa Geis, Its Clerk Dated: May 18, 2026 Page 12 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Melissa Geis, City Clerk Department: Administration Subject: Minutes of the May 4, 2026 City Council Work Session Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: For approval are the minutes of the May 4, 2026 City Council Work Session. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes of the May 4, 2026 City Council Work Session. ATTACHMENTS: 05.04.26 Work Session Minutes Page 13 of 454 Work Session Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 1 of 2 City of Farmington City Council Work Session Minutes Monday, May 4, 2026 The City Council met in a work session on Monday, May 4, 2026, at Farmington City Hall, 430 Third Street, Farmington, Minnesota. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Lien called the meeting to order at 5 pm. Members Present: Mayor Nick Lien Councilmembers Holly Bernatz, Jake Cordes, Steve Wilson and Phil Windschitl Members Absent: None Staff Present: Lynn Gorski, City Administrator David Chanski, Assistant City Administrator Deanna Kuennen, Economic & Community Development Director Kim Sommerland, Finance Director Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director Matt Price, Fire Chief Joshua Threet, President of Fire Relief Doug Rowe, Fire Relief Nate Siem, Police Chief John Powell, Public Works Director/City Engineer 2. APPROVE AGENDA Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by Councilmember Cordes to approve the agenda, as presented. Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays 3. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3.1 Planning Commission Vacancy A vacancy on the Planning Commission has been created following the City Council’s appointment of Phil Windschitl to an open City Council seat effective April 20, 2026. This action has resulted in one unfilled position on the Planning Commission that now requires Council direction. Page 14 of 454 Work Session Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 2 of 2 Following discussion of the planning commission vacancy, the City Council unanimously agreed to appoint Nate Lehmeyer as Planning Commissioner. 3.2 Gas & Electric Utility Franchise Fees Staff are seeking direction from the City Council on the process of implementing gas & electric utility franchise fees for the purpose of funding public safety infrastructure projects. After discussion it was determined that Assistant City Administrator Chanski will continue discussions with the utility companies and obtain additional data to be reviewed. 3.3 Fire Relief Pension Request Fire Relief President Joshua Threet presented the Fire Relief benefit request to revise the Fire Relief benefit level by providing up to three options. This request is based on a thorough analysis conducted by the Fire Relief Board. Following discussion, the City Council unanimously agreed on Option A to ensure that dedicated Firefighters are provided with a fair and competitive pension amount that reflects the challenges and demands of their profession. 4. COUNCIL COMMITTEE UPDATE 5. CITY ADMINISTRATOR UPDATE 6. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by Councilmember Cordes to adjourn the meeting at 6:36 pm. Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays Respectfully submitted, Melissa Geis City Clerk Page 15 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Melissa Geis, City Clerk Department: Administration Subject: Minutes of the May 4, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: For approval are the minutes of the May 4, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes of the May 4, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 05.04.26 Council Minutes Page 16 of 454 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 1 of 6 City of Farmington Regular Council Meeting Minutes Monday, May 4, 2026 The City Council met in regular session on Monday, May 4, 2026, at Farmington City Hall, 430 Third Street, Farmington, Minnesota. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Lien called the meeting to order at 7 pm. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Lien led everyone in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Mayor Nicholas Lien Councilmembers Holly Bernatz, Jake Cordes, Steve Wilson, and Phil Windschitl Members Absent: None Staff Present: Lynn Gorski, City Administrator David Chanski, Assistant City Administrator Amy Schmidt, City Attorney Deanna Kuennen, Economic & Community Development Director Kim Sommerland, Finance Director Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director Nate Siem, Police Chief John Powell, Public Works Director 4. APPROVE AGENDA Motion was made by Councilmember Windschitl and seconded by Councilmember Wilson to approve the agenda as presented. Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS / COMMENDATIONS 5.1 Top the Tater Days Proclamation A proclamation was read by the City Council to proclaim an exception to City Code, Section 3-11-4, for Top the Tater Days – Thursday, June 25, through Sunday, June 28. Page 17 of 454 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 2 of 6 5.2 Peace Officers Memorial Day Proclamation A proclamation was read by the City Council to proclaim May 15, 2026 as Peace Officers Memorial Day in Farmington. 5.3 National Public Works Day Proclamation A proclamation was read by City Council to proclaim the week of May 17 to 23, 2026 as National Public Works Week in Farmington. 6. CONSENT AGENDA 6.1 Application for Gambling Event Permit for Farmington Youth Hockey Association, June 26-28, 2026 during Top the Tater Days 6.2 Minutes of the April 20, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting 6.3 Payment of Claims 6.4 Professional Services Agreement with Abdo for Finance Staff Augmentation Services 6.5 Staff Approvals and Recommendations 6.6 Agreement with American Masonry Restoration for Exterior Masonry Repairs at City Hall 6.7 Request to Waive Fees for 2026 Top the Tater Days 6.8 Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement for the Criminal Justice Network Board 6.9 Professional Services Agreement with WSB, LLC for the 2026 Street Improvements Construction Services 6.10 Receive Bids and Award a Contract for the 2026 Street Improvements 6.11 Receive Quotes and Award a Contract for the 2026 Spring Ash Tree & Stump Removal Motion was made by Councilmember Cordes and seconded by Councilmember Bernatz to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT 8.1 AIA Owner / Architect Agreement with BKV Architects for Police Department Project Page 18 of 454 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 3 of 6 Police Chief Siem presented the Professional Services Agreement with BKV Architects for the Police Department Renovation and Expansion Project and answered questions for the Council. Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by Councilmember Bernatz to approve the AIA Owner/Architect Agreement with BKV Architects. Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays 9. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. CITIZENS COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS The following citizen(s) addressed the Council: Michael Rivera, Farmington Cathy Johnson, Castle Rock Township Nancy Aarestad, Castle Rock Township Terrie Pearson, Castle Rock Township Kris Akin, Castle Rock Township 13. CITY COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Councilmember Windschitl wished everyone Happy Mother’s Day early to all the mothers and shared that next week is National Police Week, and to remember those who gave ultimate sacrifice and the ones that continue to serve. Councilmember Bernatz congratulated FHS Theater on their Mean Girls performances and thanked the community for showing up to support. Councilmember Bernatz spoke about how Top the Tater Days is coming up and what a labor of love it is for those who do the work including neighbors, community members and businesses that donate their time and energy, and how much work happens behind the scenes. She asked residents if you are at the event and see the volunteers to please stop and thank them. She then discussed Peace Officers Memorial Day and with the loss of Officer Zajac that not everyone’s harm’s way is in the field, sometimes it is in their mind. She asked that people take time to thank an officer and be mindful of the burden they bear. Page 19 of 454 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 4 of 6 Councilmember Bernatz thanked the Public Works employees in honor of National Public Works week. She shared her experiences in other parts of the world through Global Ministry that make you realize how much is taken for granted including drinkable water, having a bathroom and a toilet that flushes. That is not something a good majority of the world has. We have safe roadways, water supply, wastewater system, and storm drains due mostly to the professionals behind the scenes. She again thanked the Police Officers, the Top the Tater Days volunteers and the Public Works department. Councilmember Cordes congratulated FHS Theater cast and crew on their fantastic job with the Mean Girls performance and he looks forward to the next production. Councilmember Wilson asked Public Works Director Powell if there is collaboration between Canadian Public Works and the American Public Works Associations for the National Public Works week. Director Powell confirmed that there are Public Works Associations worldwide and he does interact with people from other states and countries at the Public Works events. Councilmember Wilson then discussed the police department open house coming up in two weeks. He asked that people take the time to thank and ask officers how they are doing when you see them. Councilmember Wilson discussed the Fire Department annual celebration and wanted to thank and acknowledge all Fire Department personnel recognized for various awards or accomplishments including Jason Graham, Fire Officer of the Year and Rick Fischer, Firefighter of the Year. City Administrator Gorski thanked Police Chief Siem for his presentation for the police department expansion and thanked council for approving it. City Administrator Gorski shared that Fire Chief Price was unable to be here tonight as he and the Fire Department are at EV training. Assistant City Administrator Chanski thanked council for their continued support for professional staff development. City Clerk Geis is at the week-long Clerks Institute training. City Administrator Gorski and he attended the annual Minnesota City County Management Conference this past week. He was honored to be elected to his third term on the MCMA board and served on a panel with three other administrators on work life flexibility. The support from the Council is why Farmington is a great place to work. Page 20 of 454 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 5 of 6 Director Kuennen shared her department’s excitement for their upcoming BS&A online permit system roll-out in June. They are transitioning the current online permit system for the building department which will offer more features, better functionality and will streamline the process for our customers. She thanked the entire team for their efforts and the rest of staff who have already been through this and have provided advice and support. Director Kuennen announced the Economic Development Council has named this week as Economic Development Week. She then shared a quote “Behind every thriving community is a network of planners, entrepreneurs, dreamers, doers, change makers that are all driving progress and supporting the community.” She thanked all in the community that are a part of that. Director Powell explained that as part of the consent agenda they awarded the construction contract for the 2026 Street Improvements. It had nine bidders for the $2.4 million contract, and it came in about 16% under the engineer’s estimate. Next steps will be pre-construction meetings with contractor and the Public. He thanked Council for approving the contract. Director Omlid thanked all the people that helped clean the parks and ponds last week. Director Omid invited everyone to fifth annual spring food truck event on Friday, May 15th from 5:00-8:00 pm at Stelzel Ball Fields. This is a joint event with the Farmington Parks and Recreation Commission and the Empire Parks and Recreation Commission. Director Sommerland reminded residents that the first half of their property taxes are due on May 15th. Police Chief Siem thanked Director Omlid and her staff for their efforts in preparing for police week and their upcoming Police Department open house. Police Chief Siem shared this is the time to remember the fallen officer worldwide, countrywide, Dakota County and Farmington. He thanked Council for the Proclamation and hopes to see everyone at the Police Department open house this week. Mayor Lien thanked Fire Chief Price for the invitation to their event on Saturday. He congratulated Fire Officer Graham and Firefighter Fisher on their awards. Page 21 of 454 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of May 4, 2026 Page 6 of 6 Mayor Lien discussed how residents can continue to talk offline regarding details and despite what it seems conversations are moving forward, things are resolving, and new conversations are starting. He asked to keep the discussions happening and to try and stay positive through it. He thanked resident Michael Rivera for participating and for showing up for the community. 14. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by Councilmember Cordes to adjourn the meeting at 8:13 pm. Motion carried: 5 ayes / 0 nays Respectfully submitted, Melissa Geis City Clerk Page 22 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Melissa Geis, City Clerk Department: Administration Subject: Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for Farmington Municipal Liquors June 25, 2026 Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: For approval is a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License application from Farmington Municipal Liquors for an event to be held on June 25, 2026. DISCUSSION: Farmington Municipal Liquors will be hosting an event on June 25, 2026 and are requesting approval of a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License. This event will be held at the Rambling River Center west parking lot, 325 Oak Street, Farmington. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for Farmington Municipal Liquors for an event to be held on June 25, 2026 at the Rambling River Center, 325 Oak Street, Farmington. ATTACHMENTS: 6.25.26 Farmington Municipal Liquors Temp On Sale App Page 23 of 454 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7507 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date of organization Tax exempt number r--1 6-�-r,,,,,----=Of-m1_M_u_n,-.t,,-lpd--/J-·41 -u-e,(S----�II� �'-�_r;_'_s -�I I #J-l,NJ5J'SIOrganization Address (No PO Boxes) City State Zip Code .__I .......... 92"'"-";'----'8"-e_h __,,S"--'-'f::r.._,,,,u.;""--':f:---=-5«__;;;___:___._9\/.&...a,5.___ __ ____JI I fann·l1!J N}(\ 11 Minnesota 11 '6�Zl/: Name of person making application 7usiness phone Home phone .--I -�-"'- u. -�- Sct,.t ----=· 0::......1:....:..e-,---------�, I <,,"!>t-2.-tO· <-930 I ,....I--'-"---� Date(s) of event Type of organization D Microdistillery D Small Brewer ,.., 7i-h�u�n-�-4-'( ___ J_µ._n_4!. __ i_,-t-..,-,2.o-�--------,, 0 Club O Charitable O Religious □Other non-profitOrganization officer's name City State Zip Code 11 �rmln,to-,11 Minnesota 1 I e;,f502-'I Organization officer's name City Organization officer's name City Location where �rmit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. �c,.W'\lc:l\"1 ?-,i'{IU' ��, 1,X�-\-pc,...r \(..(t'' � �2-45 oJ<.. S�rFann-n,lt::n, m IV �,r,o'Z,C.( State Zip Code jMinnesota II State Zip Code !Minnesota 11 If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. )( If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the car rier's name and amount of coverage. )I. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Date Approved Fee Amount Permit Date Event in conjunc tion with a community festival D Yes D No City or County E-mail Address Cur rent population of city Please Print Name of City Clerk or County Official Signature City Clerk or County Official CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event No Temp Applications faxed or mailed. Only emailed. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY /COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE. TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US City of Farmington N/A x 23,632 Melissa Geis, City Clerk 06.25.26 MGeis@FarmingtonMN.gov Page 24 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Melissa Geis, City Clerk Department: Administration Subject: Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for The Rotary Club of Farmington June 26-28, 2026 Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: For approval is a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License from The Rotary Club of Farmington for an event to be held June 26-28, 2026. DISCUSSION: and 2026 26-28, June event an hosting are will Farmington of Club Rotary The be requesting approval of a Temporary On-Sale Liquor License. This event will be held at the Rambling River Center parking lot, 325 Oak Street, Farmington. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for The Rotary Club of Farmington for an event Street, Oak 325 Center, River Rambling the June 2026 26-28, held be to at Farmington. ATTACHMENTS: 06-26 to 06-28 2026 The Rotary Club of Farmington Page 25 of 454 Minnesota Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1600, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7507 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date of organization Tax exempt number Organization Address (No PO Boxes) City State Zip Code Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Date(s) of event Type of organization Microdistillery Small Brewer Club Charitable Religious Other non-profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City or County approving the license Date Approved Fee Amount Permit Date Event in conjunction with a community festival Yes No City or County E-mail Address Current population of city Please Print Name of City Clerk or County Official Signature City Clerk or County Official CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event No Temp Applications faxed or mailed. Only emailed. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@STATE.MN.US Minnesota Minnesota Minnesota N/A City of Farmington x 23,632 Melissa Geis, City Clerk 06/26/2026 - 06/28/2026 MGeis@FarmingtonMN.gov Page 26 of 454 The Rotary Club of Farmington T Fa RCCF Ra TaRFbCC FCR T be a f CeT RaFfba RR CF FTeeR CRbaf ge aTF Teb Rf bC aFTaFTRTa C aFTbFTRTa Tel l a F aigmr l C Rr l bnahohl f F gahn CeT RaFfba RR CF R f h F hai bgal e C T f bl f mal n CeT RaFfba RR CF Rane Fef h eoel C T l emgbei n CeT RaFfba RR CF T al bigmf T gt eo Cemreo Raohgmf Fnr i r u u m u y C nu o f eRCbf aCf FRb t u m u u C l u m u y C bRhCTehCTgRF REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Kim Sommerland, Finance Director Department: Finance Subject: Payment of Claims Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Minnesota Statutes require that all claims for payment be presented to the City Council for review and approval. DISCUSSION: The City Council has established a process to review and approve claims for payment at each regular meeting. The list of claims for the period of 04/29/2026 to 05/11/2026 is being presented for consideration, ensuring compliance with State law and maintaining proper financial oversight. BUDGET IMPACT: The claims paid will reduce the available budget for the accounts listed in the detailed report provided to the Council. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve payment of claims. ATTACHMENTS: 2026-05-18 City Claims Page 27 of 454 CLAIMS FOR APPROVAL 04/29/2026-05/11/2026 CHECK PAYMENTS 205,979.86$ ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS 144,593.97$ TOTAL 350,573.83$ The City Council receives a detail list of claims paid that is available to the public upon request. CITY OF FARMINGTON SUMMARY PAYMENT OF CLAIMS May 18, 2026 Page 28 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Matt Price, Fire Chief Department: Fire Subject: Increase the Annual Fire Relief Benefit Level Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Increasing the annual Fire Relief benefit is a strategic decision that can significantly impact recruitment, retention, and morale among Firefighters. The benefit level and the dollar amount per year of service determines the lump-sum retirement payout a Firefighter receives when they retire, typically after age 50 and full vesting DISCUSSION: Currently, the Fire Relief benefit level stands at $11,000 per year of service after reaching full vesting. The Fire Relef Board is requesting an increase to $14,000 per year for fully vested members effective May 18, 2026. This adjustment has been carefully considered by the board, taking into account various factors, including the maximum allowable benefit level and fiscal projections. The rationale behind this adjustment is to ensure that dedicated Firefighters are provided with fair and competitive pension amount that reflects the challenges and demands of their profession. The proposed increase will not only enhance the financial security of our Firefighters but also make Farmington a more attractive place for Firefighters to serve and build their careers. BUDGET IMPACT: There will be no impact to the budget. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Fire Relief Board request to increase the yearly vesting amount to $14,000 effective May 18, 2026. Page 29 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Samantha Hazelrigg, Human Resources Manager Department: HR Subject: Memorandum of Agreement for AFSCME Clerical, Technical, Professional Local #3815 - Accounting Specialist Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Staff is requesting the approval of the Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Farmington's AFSCME Clerical, Technical, Professional Local #3815 bargaining unit changing the job classification and corresponding pay of Administrative Support Specialist/AP Specialist to Accounting Specialist. DISCUSSION: The AFSCME CTP group and the City have come to an agreement in updating the job classification and corresponding pay Administrative Support Specialist/AP Specialist to Accounting Specialist. This proposed change reflects a broader range of responsibilities needed to best support the City of Farmington. BUDGET IMPACT: Position is an existing position that is included in the 2026 budget. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Memorandum of Agreement with AFSCME Clerical, Technical, Professional Local #3815. ATTACHMENTS: MOA Farmington - AFSCME re Appendix A Amendment (v.1) 042926 Page 30 of 454 Memorandum of Agreement between City of Farmington and AFSCME, Council 5 Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is made by and between City of Farmington (“Employer”) and AFSCME, Council 5 (Clerical, Technical, & Professional) (“Union”). Recitals WHEREAS, the Union is the exclusive representative for certain employees of the Employer; WHEREAS, Employer and Union are parties to a labor agreement that expires December 31, 2022 (hereinafter “Labor Agreement”); WHEREAS, the Appendix A of the Labor Agreement specifies a job classification of Administrative Support Specialist/AP Specialist job classification and corresponding pay. WHEREAS, the Employer is changing the job classification and its corresponding pay. WHEREAS, the Employer and Union desire to amend Appendix A of the Labor Agreement accordingly. WHEREAS, Employer and Union desire to memorialize their agreement related to these items. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements to be performed, as hereinafter set forth, Employer and Union agree as follows: Article 1. Amendment to the Labor Agreement . The following provision of Appendix A: Administrative Support Specialist/AP Specialist 31.465 32.214 32.963 33.713 34.462 35.212 35.960 36.709 37.458 38.357 39.278 is amended in its entirety to read: Accounting Specialist 37.110 37.995 38.878 39.762 40.645 41.528 42.412 43.295 44.180 45.240 46.325 Article 2. Entire Agreement This MOA constitutes the entire agreement among the parties hereto. No representations, warranties, covenants, or inducements have been made to any party concerning this MOA, other than the representations, covenants, or inducements contained and memorialized in this MOA. This MOA supersedes all prior negotiations, oral and written understandings, policies and practices with respect thereto addressing the specific subject matter addressed in this MOA. Page 31 of 454 Memorandum of Agreement between City of Farmington and AFSCME, Council 5 Page 2 of 2 Article 3. Waiver of Bargaining Employer and Union each voluntarily, unqualifiedly, and mutually waives the right and each agrees that while the current Labor Agreement is in full force and effect the other shall not be obligated to bargain collectively with respect to the express subjects or matters included in this MOA. Article 7. Limitations This MOA is intended for the sole and limited purpose specified herein. This MOA cannot be construed to be nor does it constitute or establish any admission of the Employer, precedent, past practice or otherwise place any prohibition or limitation on any management right of the Employer. The Employer expressly reserves the right to exercise all of its management rights without limitation. Article 8. Amendment or Modification This MOA or any of its terms may only be amended or modified by a written instrument that: (1) expressly states it is amending or modifying the MOA; and (2) is signed by or on behalf of all of the parties hereto or their successors in interest. Article 9. Voluntary and Mutual Agreement of the Parties The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that this MOA is voluntarily and mutually entered into by all parties hereto as the result of arm’s-length negotiations. Article 10. Effective Date This MOA is effective on the latest date affixed to the signatures below. IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this MOA on the latest date affixed to the signatures below. CITY OF FARMINGTON Mayor Date Signed: City Clerk Date Signed: AFSCME, COUNCIL 5 [title] Date Signed: [title] Date Signed: [title] Date Signed: Local 3815 President 5/11/2025 Page 32 of 454 State Field Director 5/11/26 Broc Haskamp Digitally signed by Broc Haskamp DN: C=US, E=bhaskamp@farmingtonmn.gov, O=City of Farmington, OU=Building Inspections, CN=Broc Haskamp Reason: I am approving this document Date: 2026.05.12 08:34:35-05'00' REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Samantha Hazelrigg, Human Resources Manager Department: HR Subject: Staff Approvals and Recommendations Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Staff recommends the following appointments: Maya Tracey - Seasonal Recreation Program Supervisor Addyson Duff - Seasonal Recreation Program Supervisor Sadie Spolarich - Seasonal Recreation Program Supervisor Tyler Aase - Seasonal Recreation Program Supervisor Jillian Van Dorn - Seasonal Recreation Program Assistant DISCUSSION: Council for appointments employee following pleased recommend to is Staff the approval. We are welcoming: Maya Tracey, Addyson Duff, Sadie Spolarich & Tyler Aase as Seasonal Recreation Program Supervisors; and Jillian Van Dorn as Seasonal Recreation Program Assistant. BUDGET IMPACT: Included in the 2026 budget. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the appointments of Maya Tracey, Tyler Aase, and Jillian Van Dorn. Page 33 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director Department: Parks & Recreation Subject: Declaring Items as Surplus and Authorizing Disposal (Parks and Recreation) Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: The Parks and Recreation Department is requesting the authorization to dispose of equipment that is no longer being used. DISCUSSION: The Parks and Recreation Department no longer has a need for the following equipment: a 2011 John Deere 1445 Tractor with snowblower, a Toolcat broom attachment, an auger attachment with two bits, 150-gallon 3-point sprayer tank, and five (5) bike racks. Rather than disposing of the equipment, the City has an opportunity to sell these surplus items through GovDeals, which provides services to various government agencies allowing them to sell surplus items through an online public auction. BUDGET IMPACT: The proceeds from the sale will be deposited into the Capital Equipment Fund. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2026-045 Declaring Items as Surplus and Authorizing Disposal. ATTACHMENTS: 2026-045 Declaring Items as Surplus and Authorizing Disposal Page 34 of 454 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-045 A RESOLUTION DECLARING ITEMS AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING DISPOSAL WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department is requesting authorization to dispose of the following equipment that is no longer needed and to dispose of the equipment at auction with funds being deposited into the Capital Equipment Fund: 2011 John Deere 1445 Tractor with Snowblower Toolcat Broom Attachment Auger Attachment with Two Bits 150-gallon 3-Point Sprayer Tank Five (5) Bike Racks NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Mayor Lien and the Farmington City Council declare the items listed above as surplus and authorize its disposal with any proceeds to be placed in the Capital Equipment Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this 18th day of May 2026. ATTEST: ____________________________ ______________________________ Nicholas Lien, Mayor Melissa Geis, City Clerk Page 35 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director Department: Parks & Recreation Subject: Donation from David McKnight to the Rambling River Center Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: David McKnight recently gave a donation to the Rambling River Center. DISCUSSION: David McKnight purchased a brand-new treadmill for the Jack and Bev McKnight Fitness Center at the Rambling River Center! The value of the treadmill is $6,335. The new treadmill was much needed as one of the older treadmills died and was too old to get replacement parts. This treadmill was original from when the Rambling River Center fitness center first opened in 2005. David McKnight will pay for the $6,335 donation over a 12-month period. This is the final payment in the amount of $2,335 received. Staff will communicate the City’s appreciation on behalf of the City Council to David McKnight for this very generous donation. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2026-043 Accepting a Donation of $2,335 from David McKnight to the Rambling River Center. ATTACHMENTS: 2026-043 Accepting $2,335 Donation from David McKnight Page 36 of 454 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-043 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF $2,335 FROM DAVID MCKNIGHT TO THE RAMBLING RIVER CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Farmington is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to accept gifts, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the following persons and entities have offered to contribute to the City: David McKnight has donated $2,335 for a treadmill for the Rambling River Center; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept this donation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Mayor Lien and the Farmington City Council hereby accept with gratitude the generous donation of $2,335 from David McKnight for a treadmill for the Rambling River Center. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this 18th day of May 2026. ATTEST: ____________________________ ______________________________ Nicholas Lien, Mayor Melissa Geis, City Clerk Page 37 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director Department: Parks & Recreation Subject: Donation from the Farmington VFW Post 7662 to the City of Farmington Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: The Farmington VFW Post 7662 recently gave a donation to the City of Farmington. DISCUSSION: The Farmington VFW Post 7662 donated 50 U.S. flags valued at $1,027.70. These flags will be displayed throughout downtown Farmington. Staff will communicate the City’s appreciation on behalf of the City Council to the Farmington VFW Post 7662 for this generous donation. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2026-044 Accepting the Donation of 50 U.S. Flags, Valued at $1,027.70, from the Farmington VFW Post 7662 to the City of Farmington. ATTACHMENTS: 2026-044 Accepting Flags from VFW Post 7662 Page 38 of 454 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-044 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF 50 U.S. FLAGS FROM THE FARMINGTON VFW POST 7662 TO THE CITY OF FARMINGTON WHEREAS, the City of Farmington is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to accept gifts, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the following persons and entities have offered to contribute to the City: Farmington VFW Post 7662 has donated 50 U.S. flags to the City of Farmington valued at $1,027.70; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept this donation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Mayor Lien and the Farmington City Council hereby accept with gratitude the generous donation of 50 U.S. flags to the City of Farmington valued at $1,027.70 from the Farmington VFW Post 7662 . Adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this 18th day of May 2026. ATTEST: ____________________________ ______________________________ Nicholas Lien, Mayor Melissa Geis, City Clerk Page 39 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Kellee Omlid, Parks & Recreation Director Department: Parks & Recreation Subject: Playground Equipment for Prairieview Park Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Staff requested proposals from four companies for the purchase and installation of new playground equipment for Prairieview Park. The project will replace the existing 5–12-year- old playground equipment and swings that were installed in 1999. The 2–5-year-old play structure was replaced in 2017 and does not need replacement at this time. DISCUSSION: The approved 2026 Park Improvement Fund budget included $70,000 for the replacement of the 5–12-year-old playground equipment and swings at Prairieview Park. The project includes removal of the existing playground equipment and swings by Parks Maintenance staff, along with the purchase and installation of new playground equipment and swings. The Parks and Recreation Commission discussed the new playground equipment for Prairieview Park and expressed interest in equipment that differs from what currently exists in Farmington and/or a two-level enclosed platform with slats. Based on this direction, staff requested playground designs from vendors that incorporated these features. Vendors were allowed to submit up to two proposals and were asked to keep the total cost for playground equipment, rubber swing mats, freight, and installation at or below $70,000. Three of the four companies submitted two proposals, and all proposals were within budget. The Parks and Recreation Commission’s 2026 work plan includes the goal to “Participate in Community Outreach and Engagement.” As part of this effort, students were invited to participate in selecting the new playground equipment for Prairieview Park. Commissioner Putt and Director Omlid attended Storytime at the Farmington Library on April 3, 2026, to allow attendees to vote on their preferred playground option. Commissioner Putt, Chair McMillen, and Director Omlid also met with students at Farmington Elementary School on April 9, 2026. First, second, and third grade students participated in voting on their preferred playground design. Following the voting process, staff contacted Webber Recreational Design, Inc. to revise Page 40 of 454 Option 2 by replacing two smaller pieces of equipment while retaining the larger main play structure. This revision was requested because the existing 2–5-year-old playground equipment at Prairieview Park is a smaller play structure. At its May 13, 2026 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the seven playground proposals and the student voting results. The Commission agreed with the students’ Miracle by equipment manufactured selected and preference playground Recreation Equipment Company and sold by Webber Recreational Design, Inc. The total cost for the playground equipment, freight, and installation is $68,289.86. The Company Equipment Recreation Miracle with parks has currently City several playground equipment, including Rambling River Park. An image of the proposed playground equipment is attached. The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously recommends that the City Council approve the purchase and installation of the playground equipment and swings from Webber Recreational Design, Inc. for Prairieview Park. Attached is the Agreement which includes the quote for the purchase and installation of the playground equipment and swings. BUDGET IMPACT: The Sourcewell contract price for the playground equipment, freight, and installation is $68,289.86. The Park Improvement Fund will cover the cost of the purchase and installation. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the purchase and installation of playground equipment and swings from Webber Recreational Design, Inc. for Prairieview Park in the amount of $68,289.86. ATTACHMENTS: Webber Recreational Design Playground Proposal 2A Agreement with Webber Recreation Design Page 41 of 454 Prairieview Park (Option 2A) Slide Farmington, MN Pa g e 4 2 o f 4 5 4 AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of ,2026,between the CITY OF FARMINGTON,a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"),and WEBBER RECREATIONAL DESIGN,INC.,a Minnesota limited liability corporation("Contractor"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL UNDERTAKINGS HEREIN CONTAINED, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents",all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A.This Agreement B.Contractor Proposal submitted on May 7,2026,attached as Exhibit “A.” In the event of con?ict among the provisions of the Contract Documents,the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such con?icts with Contract Document "A"having the ?rst priority and Contract Document "B"having the last priority. 2.OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR.The Contractor shall provide the goods,services,and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents and in compliance with federal,state,and local laws. 3.OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY.The City shall pay the Contractor in accordance with the bid and inclusive of sales tax. 4.SOFTWARE LICENSE.If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software,including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment,the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees.The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover.The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter.Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. 5.ASSIGNNEENT.Neither party may assign,sublet,or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party,and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. 6.TIME OF PERFORMANCE.The Contractor shall complete its obligations for the project on or before September 30,2026. Page 43 of 454 7. a. PAYMENT. When the obligations of the Contractor have been ful?lled,inspected,and accepted,the City shall pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed $68,289.86 Such payment shall be made not later than thirty (30)days after completion,certi?cation thereof,and invoicing by the Contractor. b.Before a ?nal invoice is submitted by Contractor,Contractor must show satisfactory compliancewith Minnesota Statutes §290.92,which requires the withholding of state income taxes for wages paid to employees on the Project.Submittal of a Certi?cate of Compliance from the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue will satisfy this requirement. 8. 9. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identi?ed in the contract documents. Contractor has visited the site and become familiar with and is satis?ed to the general, local,and Site conditions that may affect cost,progress,and performance of the work. Contractor is familiar with and is satis?ed as to all federal,state,and local laws and regulations that may affect cost,progress,and performance of the work. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations,investigations,explorations,tests,studies, and data concerning conditions at or contiguous to the site which may affect cost,progress, or performance of the work or which relate to any aspect of the means,methods, techniques,sequences,and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any speci?c means,methods,techniques,sequences,and procedures of construction expressly required by the Bidding Documents,and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations,investigations,explorations, tests,studies,or data are necessary for the performance of the work at the Contract price, within the time of performance,and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor,information and observations obtained from visits to the Site,reports and drawings identi?ed in the Contract Documents,and all additional examinations,investigations,explorations,tests,studies,and data with the Contract Documents. The Contract Documents are generally suf?cient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the work. EXTRA SERVICES.No claim will be honored for compensation for extra services or beyond the scope of this Agreement or the not-to-exceed price for the services identi?ed in the Page 44 of 454 proposal without written submittal by the Contractor,and approval of an amendment by the City,with speci?c estimates of type,time,and maximum costs,prior to commencement of the work. 10.PROMPT PAYNIENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS.Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.425,Subdivision 4a,the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10)days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of one and one-half percent (1 ‘/2%)per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor.The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00.For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00,the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor.A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements,including attomey’s fees,incurred in bringing the action. 11.INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. The Contractor,at is expense,shall procure and maintain in force for the duration of this Agreement the following minimum insurance coverages: a.General Liability.The Contractor agrees to maintain Commercial General Liability insurance in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence;$2,000,000 annual aggregate.The policy shall cover liability arising from premises,operations, products-completed operations,personal injury,advertising injury,and contractually assumed liability.The City,including its elected and appointed of?cials,employees,and agents,shall be endorsed as additional insured. b.Automobile Liabili?.If the Contractor operates a motor vehicle in performing the Services under this Agreement,the Contractor shall maintain commercial automobile liability insurance,including owned,hired,and non-owned automobiles,with a minimum liability limit of$1,000,000,combined single limit. 0.Workers’Compensation.The Contractor agrees to provide Workers’Compensation insurance for all its employees in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota.The Contractor shall also carry Employers’Liability Coverage with minimum limits are as follows: 0 $500,000 —Bodily Injury by Disease per employee 0 $500,000 —Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate 0 $500,000 —Bodily Injury by Accident The Contractor shall,prior to commencing the Services,deliver to the City a Certi?cate of Insurance as evidence that the above coverages are in full force and effect. The insurance requirements may be met through any combination of primary and umbrella/excess insurance.The City must be named as an additional insured on any umbrella/excess policy. The Contractor’s policies shall be primary insurance and non-contributory to any other valid and collectible insurance available to the City with respect to any claim arising out of the Contractor’s performance under this Agreement. Page 45 of 454 The Contractor’s policies and Certi?cate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30)days’advanced written notice to the City,or ten (10)days’written notice for nonpayment of premium. 12.MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT.Contractor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13,as it applies to (I)all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement,and (2)all data,created, collected,received,stored,used,maintained,or disseminated by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement.Contractor is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08,as if it were a government entity.In the event Contractor receives a request to release data,Contractor must immediately notify City.City will give Contractor instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released.Contractor agrees to defend,indemnify,and hold City,its of?cials,of?cers,agents,employees,and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Contractor’s of?cers’,agents’,city’s,partners’,employees’,volunteers’,assignees’or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data.The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 13.RECORDS.Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records of expenses involved in the performance of services. 14.WARRANTY.The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the bid shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City.The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship,materials,and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service,and upon proper noti?cation by the City shall immediately replace,without cost to the City,any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid speci?cations.The Contractor further warrants to the City that all goods and services furnished under the Contract will be in conformance with Contract Documents and that the goods are of merchantable quality and are ?t for the use for which they are sold.This warranty is in addition to any manufacturer's standard warranty,and any warranty provided by law. 15.NONDISCRIMINATION.All Contractors and subcontractors employed shall comply with all applicable provisions of all federal,state and municipal laws which prohibit discrimination in employment to members of a protected class and all rules and regulations, promulgated and adopted pursuant thereto.The Contractor will include a similar provision in all subcontracts entered into for the performance of this contract. 16.INDEMNITY.The Contractor agrees to defend,hold harmless,and indemnify the City,its of?cers,agents,and employees,for and against any and all claims,demands,actions,or causes of action,of whatever nature or character,arising from the Consultant's performance of work or services provided for herein.The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of all its employees on the site and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage or loss to the property on the site or properties adjacent thereto and to work,materials and equipment under the Contractor’s control. Page 46 of 454 l7.WAIVER.In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other,such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party,whether of the same or any other covenant, condition,or obligation. 18.GOVERNING LAW.The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretationof this Contract. 19.SEVERABILITY.If any provision,term,or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid,it shall not effect the remaining provisions,terms,and conditions of this Contract,unless such invalid or unenforceable provision,term,or condition renders this Contract impossibleto perform.Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties'entire contract. 20.ENTIRE AGREEMENT.This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a ?nal,complete,and all-inclusive statement of the terms thereof,and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s),understandings,or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. 21.TERMINATION.This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Contractor.In the event of termination,the City shall be obligated to the Contractor for payment of amounts due and owing for materials provided or for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. Dated:,2026 CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Nicholas Lien,Mayor By: Melissa Geis,City Clerk Dated:,2026 CONTRACTOR: WEBBER RECREATIONAL DESIGN,. Its:_President Page 47 of 454 Exhibit A Miracle Recreation Equip.Co. -878 E-US Hwy 60 QUOTE:OE26009667Miracle1223240222308 ~ '''PROJECT:26004739 DESIGN NAME:Farmington - Prairieview Park 2A Prepared For:Project Name &Location:Prepared by: JAY WEBBER Prairieview Park-WEBBER RECREATIONAL DESIGN, (Option 2A)-Slide INC. WEBBER RECREATIONAL DESGN,INC.Madison Lokowich 1442 BROOKE COURT 1442 BROOKE COURT HASTINGS,MN 55033 HASTINGS,MN 55033 612-581-4704 Ext.(phone)651-438-3630 (phone) Ship To Address:End User: Dan Stoltenberg Kellee Omlod Prairieview Park City of Farmington 1100 12th Street 430 3rd Street Farmington,MN 55024,USA Farmington,MN 55024,USA +116123693482 (phone)+16512806851 (phone) komlid@farmingtonmn.gov Quote Number:OE26009667 Quote Date:5/7/2026 Valid For:30 Days From Quote Date PlayArea_2 Product line:KidsChoice Age group:5—12_ASTM Components Part Number Description Qty Weight 2740 SWG PART THERAPEUTIC SWG SEAT W/CHAIN 1.00 135.00 (8'TR) 2760 SWG PART GENERATION SWG SEAT W/CHAIN 1.00 30.00 2840 SWG PART SLASH PROOF SEAT W/CHAIN (8'TR)2.00 10.00 4636CHAML PHYZICS CRESENT/PHAZE SLIDE FOR AXIALLH 1.00 2,200.00 787003 WELCOME SIGN AGES 5-12,FS 1.00 60.00 994167BK FRICTION WEAR MAT -32"x 54",BLACK 5.00 80.00 MR0930 3.5"ARCH SWING-(2 SEAT REQ'D)1.00 286.00 MR0932 3.5"ARCH SWG-ADD-A-BAY (2 ST REQ'D)1.00 179.00 2-5 Product line:Freestanding Age group:2-5_ASTM Components Part Number Description Qty Weight 304 TEN SPIN 1.00 1,000.00 4686 FLEXCONNECT SEAT 1.00 120.00 5/7/2026 Page 1 of 3 QUOTE:OE26009667 Page 48 of 454 657265 MOGUL SLIDE W/PVC STEPS (5'PLATFORM)1.00 400.00 9259202 TOUCH UP PAINT KIT -FREESTANDING (NO 1.00 0.00 PRICE) 994167BK FRICTION WEAR MAT -32"x 54",BLACK 1.00 80.00 RiskSign_lncluded Product line:Freestanding Age group: Components Part Number Description Qty Weight 787Z RISK MANAGEMENT SIGN -ENGLISH (NO PRICE)1.00 0.00 Additional Items Part Number Description Qty Weight 105295 BAG ZIPLOCK 12"X 14"X 4M|L(OFF|CE USE)1.00 0.00 925961 THUMB DRIVE 2GB -MREC 1.00 0.00 926458 LABEL,GENERATION SWG,2YR-12YR,MR 1.00 0.00 INSTALL INSTALL BOOK FOR PP ORDERS 1.00 0.00 BOOK Totals: City of Farmington-Equipment Weight:4,910.00 lbs Sourcewell Contract #20423 Equipment List:$60,175.20 Discount Amount:-$16,449.34 Equipment Price:$43,726.86 Freight:$2,163.00 Code:Needed Installation:$22,400.00 Grand Total:$68,289.86 Notes:Please make PO’s out to:Webber Recreational Design,Inc. This Quoteshall not become a binding contract until signed and delivered by both Customer and Miracle Recreation Equipment Company (“Miracle”).Sales Representative is not authorized to sign this Quoteon behalf of Miracle or Customer,and signed Quotescannot be accepted from Sales Representative.To submit this offer,please sign below and forward a complete signed copy of this Quote directly to "Miracle Sales Administration"via fax (417)235-3551 or email:orders@miraclerec.com.Upon acceptance,Miracle will return a fully-signed copy of the Quoteto Customer (with copy to Sales Representative)via fax or email. THIS QUOTEIS LIMITED TO AND GOVERNED BY THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN.Miracle objects to any other terms proposed by Customer,in writing or otherwise,as material alterations,and all such proposed terms shall be void.Customer authorizes Miracle to ship the Equipment and agrees to pay Miracle the total amount speci?ed.Shipping terms are FOB the place of shipment via common carrier designated by Miracle.Payment terms are Net-3O days from invoice date with approved credit and all charges are due and payable in full at PO Box 734154, Dallas,TX 75373-4154,unless noti?ed otherwise by Miracle in writing.Customer agrees to pay all additional service charges for past due invoices.Customer must provide proper tax exemption certi?cates to Miracle,and shall promptly pay and discharge all otherwise applicable taxes, license fees,levies and other impositions on the Equipment at its own expense.Purchase orders and payments should be made to the order of Miracle Recreation Equipment Company. Quote Number:OE26009667 Quote Date:5/7/2026 Equipment:$60,176.20 Grand Total:$68,289.86 CUSTOMER HEREBY SUBMITS ITS OFFER TO PURCHASE THE EQUIPMENTACCORDING TO THE TERMS STATED IN THIS QUOTE AND SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BY MIRACLE. 5/7/2026 Page 2 of 3 QUOTE:OE26009667 Page 49 of 454 Submitted By Printed Name and Title Date THE FOREGOING QUOTEAND OFFER ARE HEREBY APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT By: Date: ADDITIONAL TERMS &CONDITIONS OF SALE .._.‘. 1.Use &Maintenance.Customer agrees to regularly inspect and maintain the EqUIpment,and to provnde,Inspect and maintain appropriate safety surfacing under and around the Equipment,in accordance with Miracle's product literature and the most current Consumer Product Safety Commission Handbook for Public Playground Safety. 2.Default,Remedies 8.Delinquency Charges.Customer's failure to pay any invoice when due,or its failure to otherwise comply with the terms of this Quote,shall constitute a default under all unsatisfied invoices ("Event of Default").Upon an Event of Default,Miracle shall have all remedies available to it at law or equity,including,without limitation,all remedies afforded a secured creditor under the Uniform Commercial Code. Customer agrees to assist and cooperate with Miracle to accomplish its filing and enforcement of mechanic's or other liens with respect to the Equipment or its location or its repossession of the Equipment,and Customer expressly waives all rights to possess the Equipment after an Event of Default.All remedies are cumulative and not alternative,and no exercise by Miracle of a remedy will prohibit or waive the exercise of any other remedy.Customer shall pay all reasonable attorneys fees plus any costs of collection incurred by Miracle in enforcing its rights hereunder.Subject to any limitations under law,Customer shall pay to Miracle as liquidated damages,and not as a penalty,an amount equal to 1.5%per month of any payment that is delinquent in such month and is not received by Miracle within ten (10)days after the date on which due. 3.Limitation of Warranty/Indemnity.MIRACLE MAKES NO EQUIPMENT WARRANTIES EXCEPT FOR THOSE STANDARD WARRANTIES ISSUED WITH THE EQUIPMENT,WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE.MIRACLE SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMSANY IMPLIEDWARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITYOR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ANY LIABILITYFOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES.CUSTOMER AGREES TO DEFEND,INDEMNIFYAND SAVE MIRACLE HARMLESS FROM ALL CLAIMS OF ANY KIND FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KINDARISING OUT OF CUSTOMERS ALTERATION OF THE EQUIPMENT,ITS FAILURE TO MAINTAINTHE EQUIPMENT,ITS FAILURE TO PROPERLY SUPERVISE EQUIPMENT USE,OR ITS FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE TYPES AND DEPTHS OF SAFETY SURFACING BENEATH AND AROUND THE EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MIRACLES INSTALLATIONAND OWNERS MANUALSAND THE MOST CURRENT CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION HANDBOOK FOR PUBLIC PLAYGROUND SAFETY. 4.Restrictions.Until all amounts due hereunder are paid in full,Customer shall not:(i)permit the Equipment to be levied upon or attached under any legal process;(ii)transfer title to the Equipment or any of Customer's rights therein;or (iii)remove or permit the removal of the Equipment to any location not specified in this Quote. 5.Purchase Money Security Interest.Customer hereby grants,pledges and assigns to Miracle,and Miracle hereby reserves a purchase money security interest in,the Equipment in order to secure the payment and performance in full of all of Customer's obligations hereunder.Customer agrees that Miracle may ?le one or more financing statements,in order to allow it to perfect,acquire and maintain a superior security interest in the Equipment. 6.Choice of Law and Jurisdiction.All agreements between Customer and Miracle shall be interpreted,and the parties‘obligations shall be governed,by the laws of the State of Missouri without reference to its choice of law provisions.Customer hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the city and county of St.Louis,Missouri. 7.Title;Risk of Loss;Insurance.Miracle Retains full title to all Equipment until full payment is received by Miracle.Customer assumes all risk of loss or destruction of or damage to the Equipment by reason of theft,fire,water,or any other cause.and the occurrence of any such casualty shall not relieve the Customer from its obligations hereunder and under any invoices.Until all amounts due hereunder are paid in full,Customer shall insure the Equipment against all such losses and casualties. 8.Waiver;Invalidity.Miracle may waive a default hereunder,or under any invoice or other agreement between Customer and Miracle,or cure such a default at Customer's expense,but shall have no obligation to do either.No waiver shall be deemed to have taken place unless it is in writing,signed by Miracle.Any one waiver shall not constitute a waiver of other defaults or the same kind of default at another time,or a forfeiture of any rights provided to Miracle hereunder or under any invoice.The invalidity of any portion of this Quote shall not affect the force and effect of the remaining valid portions hereof. 9.Entire Agreement;Amendment;Binding Nature.This fully-executed Quote,as supplemented by Change Orders and invoices containing exact amounts of estimates provided herein,constitutes the complete and exclusive agreement between the parties.A Change Order is a written instrument signed by the Customer and Miracle stating their agreement as to any amendment in the terms of this Quote.Customer acknowledges that Change Orders may result in delays and additional costs.The parties agree that all Change Orders shall include appropriate adjustments in price and time frames relating to any requested amendments.Upon full execution,this Quote shall be binding upon and inure to the bene?t of the parties and their successors and assigns. 10.Counterparts;Electronic Transmission.This Quote,any invoice,and any other agreement between the parties,may be executed in counterparts,each of which shall constitute an original.The facsimile or other electronic transmission of any signed original document and retransmission of any signed facsimile or other electronic transmission shall be the same as the transmission of an original.At the request of either party,the parties will confirm facsimile or other electronically transmitted signatures by signing an original document. Rev E 021815 5/7/2026 Page 3 of 3 QUOTE:OE26009667 Page 50 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Nate Siem, Police Chief Department: Police Subject: Donation from Beans & Boots LLC to the Farmington Police Department K9 program Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: A donation was made to the Farmington Police Department K9 program from Beans & Boots LLC DISCUSSION: A donation in the amount of $1,057.50 was made by Beans & Boots Coffee to the FPD K9 program. The money was from proceeds of Beans & Boots sales of "Back the Bark" coffee. The donation has been deposited into the City's general fund, for the purpose of supporting the K9 program's expenses. Staff would like to express their appreciation to Beans & Boots Coffee for their generous donation. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2026-042 Accepting a Donation of $1,057.50 from Beans & Boots LLC ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2026-042 - Donation from Beans & Boots LLC Page 51 of 454 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-042 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF $1,057.50 FROM BEANS & BOOTS LLC TO THE FARMINGTON POLICE K-9 PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Cit of Farmington is generally authorized to accept donations of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to accept gifts, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the following persons and entities have offered to contribute to the City: Beans & Boots LLC has donated $1,057.50 to the Farmington Police Department K-9 Program, with funds raised through proceeds from sales of “Back the Bark” coffee; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept this donation; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Farmington hereby accepts with gratitude the generous donation of $1,057.50 from Beans & Boots LLC to the Farmington Police K-9 Program. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this 18th day of May 2026. ATTEST: ____________________________ ______________________________ Nick Lien, Mayor Melissa Geis, City Clerk Page 52 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: John Powell, Public Works Director Department: Engineering Subject: Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for the Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: At the December 15, 2025, City Council meeting, the City Council approved the 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The approved CIP includes the Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study. Flagstaff Avenue from CSAH 50 to the north city limit is a critical north-south roadway corridor in the city. Most of the corridor currently consists of a two-lane rural (no curb and gutter) section with drainage conveyed via ditches. Farmington High School traffic directly accesses Flagstaff Avenue on the west side, and there has been extensive residential development near CSAH 50, most recently the Sawyer Glen preliminary plat. Consistent with its expected future use, the city portions of Flagstaff Avenue have been designated as a Municipal State Aid System (MSAS) route. A study of expected future traffic demands, intersection controls, access management, the future guide to necessary is movements, turning cross-section, roadway etc. infrastructure investment. DISCUSSION: Consultant Alliant 2023-2027. for Pool the in Council City the 2023, Early approved Engineering is one of the firms in the Consultant Pool and has prepared the attached scope and budget based on discussions with City Staff. A map of the project area is included is attached. Major tasks included in the scope are the following: Project Management Data Collection Public Engagement Traffic Forecasting and Analysis Corridor Recommendations Among other items, the detailed proposed scope includes: Periodic check in meetings with the city and Dakota County Four open house meetings Page 53 of 454 Two individual meetings with property owners Existing conditions review Traffic counts Safety Analysis Traffic forecasting Existing conditions and no build traffic analysis Access spacing review Documentation of existing and future deficiencies Identification and evaluation of cross section alternatives Preparing a Traffic Analysis and Recommendations Technical Memorandum Developing up to three conceptual roadway layouts and typical sections Conceptual designs of key intersections Evaluating the alternatives Preparing a layout for he preferred alternative Preparing preliminary construction cost estimate for the preferred alternative Preparing a draft and final Corridor Study Report Staff anticipates that the first open house will be scheduled for late June with completion of the study by the end of 2026. BUDGET IMPACT: Work under this contract will be billed hourly for a cost not to exceed $149,890. As identified in the approved 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan, the funding sources for this project are as follows: Funding Source Amount State Aid (MSA Funds) $ 120,000 County Funds $ 30,000 Total $ 150,000 The total study corridor length is 3.2 miles; 0.5 miles of this length (195th Street to 200th Street) is under County jurisdiction, about 15.625%. Based on the County's cost sharing policy, they pay 85% of the cost for their segment; or 13.3% of the total cost. 13.3% of $149,890 is $19,935.37. Use of Municipal State Aid funds is planned for the remaining balance (about $130,000). ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Alliant Engineering, Inc. for the Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study. ATTACHMENTS: 051826 alliant PSA flagstaff corridor study flagstaff avenue study location map 051826 Page 54 of 454 224345v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made this 18th day of May, 2026, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation, whose business address is 430 3rd St, Farmington, MN 55024 (hereinafter "City") and Alliant Engineering, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, whose business address is 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 (hereinafter "Engineer"). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The City has adopted a policy regarding the selection and hiring of consultants to provide a variety of professional services for City projects. That policy requires that persons, firms or corporations providing such services enter into written agreements with the City. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions for the provision of professional services by Engineer for engineering services, hereinafter referred to as the "Work", and as outlined on Exhibit “A” attached hereto. IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Engineer to furnish the services set forth on the attached Exhibit “A”. The Engineer agrees to perform the services. Engineer shall provide all personnel, supervision, services, materials, tools, equipment and supplies and do all things necessary and ancillary thereto specified on Exhibit “A”. The Work to be performed under this Agreement shall be done under the review of a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota, who shall attest that the Work will be performed in compliance with all applicable codes and engineering standards. The Work shall be performed in accordance with the Contract Documents, which includes this Agreement and the attached Exhibits: Exhibit “A” – Scope of Services, Exhibit “B” – Schedule of Payment and Fee Schedule. In the event any ambiguity or conflict between the Contract Documents listed above, the order of precedence shall be the following order: (i) this Agreement; (ii) Exhibit “A”, (iii) Exhibit “B”. 2. REPRESENTATIVES. City has designated John Powell, Public Works Director/City Engineer (the “City Representative”), and the Engineer has designated Eric Nelson, Client Services Manager (the “Engineer Representative”). The City Representative and the Engineer Representative shall be available as often as is reasonably necessary for reviewing the Services and Work to be performed. 3. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES. Engineer shall be paid by the City for the services described in Exhibit “A” on an hourly basis in accordance with the attached fee schedule, Exhibit “B”, but not to exceed $149,890 inclusive of taxes and reimbursable costs. A. Any changes in the scope of the Work which may result in an increase to the compensation due the Engineer shall require prior written approval by the Page 55 of 454 224345v1 authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional compensation for services that do not have prior written authorization. B. Special Consultants may be utilized by the Engineer when required by the complex or specialized nature of the Project and when authorized in writing by the City. 4. COMPLETION DATE/TERM. The Engineer must complete the Services by February 28, 2027. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate, and upon the terms and conditions as herein stated. 5. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All plans, diagrams, analyses, reports and information generated in connection with the performance of the Agreement (“Information”) shall become the property of the City, but Engineer may retain copies of such documents as records of the services provided. The City may use the Information for its purposes and the Engineer also may use the Information for its purposes. Use of the Information for the purposes of the project contemplated by this Agreement does not relieve any liability on the part of the Engineer, but any use of the Information by the City or the Engineer beyond the scope of the Project is without liability to the other, and the party using the Information agrees to defend and indemnify the other from any claims or liability resulting therefrom. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Engineer shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. Any violation of statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations pertaining to the Services to be provided shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and entitle the City to immediately terminate this Agreement. Engineer’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices related to services provided to the City are subject to examination by the legislative auditor or the state auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Engineer shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional engineer under similar circumstances. Engineer shall be liable to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law, without limitation, for any injuries, loss, or damages proximately caused by Engineer’s breach of this standard of care. Engineer shall put forth reasonable efforts to complete its duties in a timely manner. Engineer shall not be responsible for delays caused by factors beyond its control or that could not be reasonably foreseen at the time of execution of this Agreement. Engineer shall be responsible for costs, delays, or damages arising from unreasonable delays in the performance of its duties. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Engineer’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Engineer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all judgments, claims, damages, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees paid or incurred resulting from any breach of this Agreement by Engineer, its agents, contractors and employees, or any Page 56 of 454 224345v1 negligent or intentional act or omission performed, taken or not performed or taken by Engineer, its agents, contractors and employees, relative to this Agreement. City will indemnify and hold Engineer harmless from and against any loss for injuries or damages arising out of the negligent acts of the City, its officers, agents, or employees. 9. INSURANCE. a. General Liability. Prior to starting the Work, Engineer shall procure, maintain, and pay for such insurance as will protect against claims or loss which may arise out of operations by Engineer or by any subcontractor or by anyone employed by any of them or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Such insurance shall include, but not be limited to, minimum coverages and limits of liability specified in this Paragraph, or required by law. b. Engineer shall procure and maintain the following minimum insurance coverages and limits of liability for the Work: Worker’s Compensation Statutory Limits Employer’s Liability $500,000 each accident $500,000 disease policy limit $500,000 disease each employee Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 property damage and bodily injury per occurrence $2,000,000 general aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit each accident (shall include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owed vehicles.) Commercial General Liability requirements may be met through a combination of umbrella or excess liability insurance. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and umbrella policies. c. Professional Liability Insurance. In addition to the coverages listed above, Engineer shall maintain a professional liability insurance policy in the amount of $2,000,000. Said policy need not name the City as an additional insured. Page 57 of 454 224345v1 d. Engineer shall maintain “stop gap” coverage if Engineer obtains Workers’ Compensation coverage from any state fund if Employer’s liability coverage is not available. e. All policies, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, Automobile Policy, and Professional Liability Policy, shall name the “City of Farmington” as an additional insured. f. All policies, except the Professional Liability Policy, shall apply on a “per project” basis. g. All polices shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City. h. All policies, except for the Worker’s Compensation Policy and the Professional Liability Policy, shall be primary and non-contributory. i. All polices, except the Worker’s Compensation Policy, shall insure the defense and indemnity obligations assumed by Engineer under this Agreement. j. Engineer agrees to maintain all coverage required herein throughout the term of the Agreement and for a minimum of two (2) years following City’s written acceptance of the Work. k. It shall be Engineer’s responsibility to pay any retention or deductible for the coverages required herein. l. The Engineer’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days advanced written notice to the City. m. Engineer shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required under this Paragraph at Engineer’s sole expense and with insurance companies licensed to do business in the state in Minnesota and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A-, unless specifically accepted by City in writing and all insurance policies shall be on ISO forms acceptable to the City. n. A copy of the Engineer’s Certificate of Insurance which evidences the compliance with this Paragraph, must be filed with City prior to the start of Engineer’s Work. Upon request a copy of the Engineer’s insurance declaration page, rider and/or endorsement, as applicable shall be provided. Such documents evidencing insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and shall provide satisfactory evidence that Engineer has complied with all insurance requirements. Renewal certificates shall be provided to City prior to the expiration date of any of the required policies. City will not be obligated, however, to review such Certificate of Insurance, declaration page, rider, endorsement, certificates, or other evidence of insurance, or to advise Engineer of any deficiencies in such documents and Page 58 of 454 224345v1 receipt thereof shall not relieve Engineer from, nor be deemed a waiver of, City’s right to enforce the terms of Engineer’s obligations hereunder. City reserves the right to examine any policy provided for under this Agreement. o. Effect of Engineer’s Failure to Provide Insurance. If Engineer fails to provide the specified insurance, then Engineer will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, the City's officials, agents, and employees from any loss, claim, liability, and expense (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses of litigation) to the extent necessary to afford the same protection as would have been provided by the specified insurance. Except to the extent prohibited by law, this indemnity applies regardless of any strict liability or negligence attributable to the City (including sole negligence) and regardless of the extent to which the underlying occurrence (i.e., the event giving rise to a claim which would have been covered by the specified insurance) is attributable to the negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission (including breach of contract) of Engineer, its subcontractors, agents, employees or delegates. Engineer agrees that this indemnity shall be construed and applied in favor of indemnification. Engineer also agrees that if applicable law limits or precludes any aspect of this indemnity, then the indemnity will be considered limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The stated indemnity continues until all applicable statutes of limitation have run. If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity in section o, the City may require Engineer to: i. Furnish and pay for a surety bond, satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing performance of the indemnity obligation; or ii. Furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from Engineer's insurance company. Engineer will take the action required by the City within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice from the City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Engineer as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Engineer is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Engineer shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Engineer shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Engineer's performance under this Agreement. City and Engineer agree that Engineer shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Engineer or any of Engineer's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Engineer shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Engineer's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Engineer shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Engineer shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Engineer must pay subcontractor for all undisputed Page 59 of 454 224345v1 services provided by subcontractor within ten (10) days of Engineer’s receipt of payment from City. Engineer must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 12. ASSIGNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other than the City and Engineer, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the City and Engineer and not for the benefit of any other party. 13. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 15. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Dakota County District Court. 16. COPYRIGHT. Engineer shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings, or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 17. RECORDS. The Engineer shall maintain complete and accurate records of time and expense involved in the performance of services. 18. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Engineer must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Engineer pursuant to this Agreement. Engineer is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Engineer receives a request to release data, Engineer must immediately notify City. City will give Engineer instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Engineer agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Engineer’s officers’, agents’, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’, or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. Page 60 of 454 224345v1 19. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by City on thirty (30) days’ written notice delivered to Engineer at the address on file with the City. Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Engineer, the Engineer shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If the City terminates the Agreement because the Engineer has failed to perform in accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the Engineer, and the City may retain another engineer to undertake or complete the work identified in Paragraph 1. 20. NON-DISCRIMINATION. During the performance of this Agreement, the Engineer shall not discriminate against any employee or applicants for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation or age. The Engineer shall post in places available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this non- discrimination clause and stating that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. The Engineer shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. The Engineer further agrees to comply with all aspects of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes 363.01, et. seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 21. SURVIVAL. All express representations, waivers, indemnifications, and limitations of liability included in this Agreement will survive its completion or termination for any reason. 22. SERVICES NOT PROVIDED FOR. Claims for services furnished by the Engineer not specifically provided for herein shall not be honored by the City. 23. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, such decision shall not affect the remaining provisions of this Agreement. 24. CONFLICTS. No officer or salaried employee of the City and no member of the Council of the City shall have a financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement. The violation of this provision renders the Agreement void. 25. NOTICES. Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally, by facsimile, by registered or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial courier service. All notices shall be effective upon the date of receipt. 26. WAIVER. A party’s non-enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. Page 61 of 454 224345v1 27. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original. Dated: May 18, 2026 CITY: CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Nicholas Lien Mayor By: Melissa Geis City Clerk Dated:__________________, 20___ ENGINEER: ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. By: [print name] Its: [title] Page 62 of 454 224345v1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES AND EXHIBIT “B” SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT AND FEE SCHEDULE Page 63 of 454 Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study // 1 RE: Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study Dear Mr. Powell: Alliant Engineering appreciates the opportunity to provide the City of Farmington with a corridor study of Flagstaff Avenue between CSAH 50 and the northern city limit. Based on the information you have provided and our previous discussions, we have prepared the following scope of services. The sections below describe each major task along with key assumptions, information or participation needed from the city, and major deliverables. A detailed spreadsheet documenting the hours and fee associated with each task is also included with this letter. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Flagstaff Avenue between CSAH 50 and the northern city limit is an important north-sound corridor and serves as the main route to Farmington High School. With expected growth in the area, a corridor study is needed to plan the future vision of the corridor and identify funding needs for future improvements. A portion of the corridor is a County State Aid Highway, so planning efforts will be coordinated with Dakota County throughout the study process. SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT Eric Nelson will be the Project Manager for the Alliant Team and will serve as the single point of contact for the city. Eric will prepare monthly progress reports and invoices for review and approval by the city. Throughout the design process, Eric will conduct monthly meetings with the city project manager to provide status updates and review design decisions needed. We also recommend a kickoff meeting with the Dakota County representative at the start of the project to build consensus on the project goals and outcomes and share information. We have scoped two additional project meetings with City and County staff to review progress and discuss any decisions needed. Following the submittal of each draft document, we will create comment resolution logs that compile all city and county comments received and our response to each comment. CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES: ● Participate in monthly check-in meetings. CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES: ● Monthly progress reports and invoices ● Comment resolution logs Design Fee for Task 1: $11,730 April 27, 2026 John Powell, PE Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Page 64 of 454 Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study // 2 TASK 2 – DATA COLLECTION Prior to commencing our corridor analysis, we will review existing data sources that may inform the corridor study including other relevant City or County studies, record drawings, National Wetland Index (NWI) mapping, floodplain mapping, and available traffic information from Dakota County or other sources. CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES: ● Provide any available record drawings for the project area. ● Provide updated comprehensive plan information pertaining to land use planning. ● Provide any available information for planned developments along the corridor. DAKOTA COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES: • Provide Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021) information regarding future road alignments (CR60/64 extension), jurisdictional turnbacks, etc. Design Fee for Task 2: $1,620 TASK 3 – PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT As discussed with the city, our approach to public engagement will include three in-person open house meetings for the project. The first will occur at the beginning of the process and is intended to share high-level goals for the project and to collect feedback on issues within the project area that could be addressed or improved. The second open house meeting will present potential corridor concepts and intersection design alternatives. The final open house meeting will present the study recommendations and next steps in implementation. Alliant will create a mailing list and prepare and distribute a mailer for each open house meeting providing logistical information about the meeting and a preview of its messaging. We will also prepare layouts, display boards, and other printed materials needed to convey the project intent and to facilitate discussion. Attendance and feedback at each meeting will be compiled in a summary document that can be included with the feasibility report to demonstrate the engagement process. We have also included time to attend up to two in-person meetings with individual property owners or stakeholders if needed. CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES: ● Provide mailing list for meeting invite distribution. ● Review and comment on draft mailer and open house materials. ● Attend open house meetings with Alliant staff. ● Attend individual property owner meetings (if needed) CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES: ● Draft and final mailers for open house meetings ● Draft and final printed open house materials ● Meeting Summary Documents Design Fee for Task 3: $19,530 Page 65 of 454 Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study // 3 TASK 4 – TRAFFIC FORECASTING AND ANALYSIS The following sections describe our approach for collecting data and analyzing traffic operations, safety, and forecasting to make recommendations for corridor improvements. Subtask 4.1 – Data Collection ● Collect 13-hour turning movement counts for cars, heavy vehicles, and pedestrians at the following existing intersections. Turning movement count data should be collected during a weekday when school is in session. o Flagstaff Avenue and 179th Street o Flagstaff Avenue and 190th Street o Flagstaff Avenue and 195th Street o Flagstaff Avenue and 200th Street o Flagstaff Avenue and High School Entrance – North o Flagstaff Avenue and High School Entrance – South o Flagstaff Avenue and CSAH 50 ● Collect 4-hour turning movement counts for cars, heavy vehicles, and pedestrians at the following existing intersections. Turning movement count data should be collected during a weekday when school is in session. o Flagstaff Avenue and 209th Street o Flagstaff Avenue and 210th Street o Flagstaff Avenue and 211th Street Subtask 4.2 – Existing Conditions Review ● Review and document existing conditions along Flagstaff Avenue and its intersecting streets, including but AADTs, intersection traffic control, lane geometry, key destinations and planned developments, and non- motorized facilities. ● Conduct field observations of school peak periods including coordination with High School staff regarding overall school operations, bus/parent/walking splits, and parent communication. Subtask 4.3 – Safety Analysis ● Obtain the most recent five years of crash data along the corridor from the MnCMAT database and any available city records. Compare crash performance for intersections and segments to statewide averages. This includes summarizing crash rates, K/A rates, critical crash rates, and critical K/A rates. Provide collision diagrams for corridor intersections. Subtask 4.4 – Traffic Forecasting ● Develop 10-year and 20-year traffic forecasts based on background growth rates and planned future development. The analysis will include the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Sawyer Glen development and any other known or planned developments along the Flagstaff Avenue corridor. Future city street extensions or other expansions of the transportation network that would impact Flagstaff Avenue will be reviewed with the City and County at the onset of the project and incorporated into the analysis as appropriate. o Build Scenario A will be developed based on the existing roadway network. Page 66 of 454 Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study // 4 o Build Scenario B will be developed assuming a future County extension between Cedar Avenue and the intersection of Flagstaff Avenue and 195th Street and other future roadway network improvements identified. Subtask 4.5 – Existing Conditions & No Build Traffic Analysis ● Perform existing conditions AM and PM peak hour traffic analysis for existing year as well as 10-year and 20-year forecast traffic volumes. Document measures of effectiveness including delay, LOS, and queuing results. Roundabouts will be modeled using HCS or Arcady. All other intersection control types will be modeled using Synchro/SimTraffic. o An additional scenario will be modeled if the afternoon school peak hour does not align with the PM peak of Flagstaff Avenue. ● Perform planning-level capacity analysis for the existing Flagstaff Avenue cross-section under existing and forecast year volume scenarios. Subtask 4.6 – Access Spacing Review ● Investigate existing access spacing and review access spacing guidelines, including Dakota County spacing standards or equivalent City of Farmington standards, to assist in determining appropriate spacing and development of potential concepts for corridor access modifications. Subtask 4.7 – Document Existing and Future Deficiencies ● Identify unsafe intersections or roadway segments. ● Identify how growth rates, urbanization of the roadway and development in the area may impact future traffic volumes. ● Identify opportunities for corridor improvements to safety, mobility, and other considerations. Evaluation will include a high-level analysis of bicycle/pedestrian facilities and potential safe crossing locations. ● Provide corridor recommendations, including number of travel lanes, intersection configurations, and multimodal transportation opportunities. Subtask 4.8 – Identify and Evaluate Alternatives ● Based on existing and future deficiencies outlined in Subtask 4.7, identify and evaluate safety and operational impacts for intersection and cross-section alternatives along the corridor under existing, 10- year, and 20-year forecast volumes using similar tools and methods as outlined in Subtasks 4.3 and 4.5. Page 67 of 454 Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study // 5 Subtask 4.9 – Traffic Analysis and Recommendations Technical Memorandum ● Prepare a draft and final technical memorandum documenting the traffic analysis process and results. CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES: ● Provide any available data on traffic volumes, documented crashes, or other observed traffic operational issues. ● Review and comment on draft technical memorandum. CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES: ● Draft and final Traffic Analysis and Recommendations Technical Memorandum Design Fee for Task 4: $50,530 TASK 5 – CORRIDOR RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the recommendations from the traffic study, our team will develop concept layouts and intersection graphics to facilitate the evaluation of alternatives by the project team. The following sections describe our approach to this task. Subtask 5.1 – Conceptual Layouts and Typical Sections ● Based on the predicted traffic volumes and recommended lane configurations from the traffic study, we will develop up to three conceptual layouts and typical sections for the corridor. Beyond Typicals will be used to illustrate the proposed corridor sections for the open house graphics and review by the project team. Subtask 5.2 – Conceptual Intersection Design ● At key intersections along the corridor, we will develop conceptual graphics showing lane assignments, turning movements, and other design considerations as needed for evaluation by the project team. Subtask 5.3 – Alternatives Evaluation Matrix ● The impacts associated with the identified alternatives will be compiled into an Alternatives Evaluation Matrix to allow comparison and evaluation by the project team. Criteria in the matrix will include cost, right-of-way needs, natural resources impacts, and traffic benefits. Subtask 5.4 – Layout for Preferred Alternative ● After a preferred alternative is determined by the project team, a layout for the corridor will be developed. This layout will include the following information at a minimum: o Most current aerial photography o Existing and proposed right-of-way o NWI wetland boundaries and any identified floodplain areas o Proposed corridor and intersection geometry, including an assumed shared use trail on the west side of Flagstaff Avenue o Representative typical sections along the corridor o Conceptual stormwater management best management practice locations and sizing Page 68 of 454 Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study // 6 Subtask 5.5 – Preliminary Cost Estimate ● A preliminary cost estimate will be developed based on the preferred alternative to guide future funding requests and planning efforts. The estimate will include major construction items and an appropriate level of contingency based on the level of design and risk factors. Subtask 5.6 – Corridor Study Report ● The findings of the traffic study, corridor analysis and design, and overall study process will be documented in a Corridor Study Report to aid in future project scoping and funding planning. CITY OF FARMINGTON RESPONSIBILITIES: ● Review and comment on draft deliverables. CONSULTANT DELIVERABLES: ● Concept layouts and intersection graphics ● Draft and final Alternatives Evaluation Matrix ● Draft and final layout for preferred alternative ● Draft and final preliminary cost estimate ● Draft and final Corridor Study Report Design Fee for Task 5: $64,380 Subtotal of Design Fees $147,790 Reimbursable Expenses $2,100 Total Project Fee $149,890 SCHEDULE The following is an estimate of our schedule based on the available information. We will be flexible and can adjust this schedule to meet the City’s needs. ● Notice to Proceed: Week of May 18, 2026 ● Traffic data collection complete: end of May 2026 ● Open House No. 1: June 2026 ● Traffic analysis complete: end of July 2026 ● Concept layouts and intersection graphics complete: August 2026 ● Open House No. 2: September 2026 ● Layout for Preferred Alternative and Cost Estimate complete: November 2026 ● Open House No. 3: November 2026 ● Corridor Study Report complete: December 2026 Page 69 of 454 Proposal for Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study // 7 KEY STAFF The Alliant design team will consist of the following individuals: ● Eric Nelson, PE — Project Manager ● Nick Grage, PE — Traffic Analysis Lead ● Shauna McIntire, PE — Traffic Engineer We again thank you for the opportunity to work with the city on this project and are ready and eager to get started. If you have any questions about this scope and fee or want to discuss in further detail, please contact me at the email address or phone number listed on the following page. Sincerely, Alliant Engineering, Inc. Eric Nelson, PE Project Manager EMAIL enelson@alliant-inc.com DIRECT 612.767.9380 Building better communities with excellence and passion Page 70 of 454 Alliant Engineering City of Farmington - Flagstaff Avenue Corridor Study Hours and Fee Estimate Principal Associate Senior Professional Engineer Professional Engineer Graduate Engineer Graphics/ Admin Data Collector Nelson Grage McIntire 1.0 Project Management 35 12 0 0 0 0 0 47 $11,730.00 1.1 Routine project management 14 14 $3,780.00 1.2 Monthly invoices and progress reports (1) 7 7 $1,890.00 1.3 Monthly update meetings (2) 6 6 $1,620.00 1.4 Kickoff meeting and progress meetings with Dakota County (3) 6 12 18 $3,900.00 1.5 Comment resolution logs for draft submittals 2 2 $540.00 2.0 Data Collection 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 10 $1,620.00 2.1 Review available background information 2 8 10 $1,620.00 3.0 Public Engagement 25 0 36 0 0 72 0 133 $19,530.00 3.1 Open House Meetings (4) 12 24 36 $6,960.00 3.2 Preparation and distribution of mailers 3 12 15 $2,010.00 3.3 Preparation of meeting exhibits 3 12 60 75 $8,670.00 3.4 Open House Summary Documents 3 3 $810.00 3.5 Individual property owner meetings 4 4 $1,080.00 4.0 Traffic Forecasting and Analysis 4 34 128 0 188 0 18 372 $50,530.00 4.1 Data collection 8 18 26 $2,450.00 4.2 Existing conditions review 4 4 $460.00 4.3 Safety analysis 4 16 20 $2,460.00 4.4 Traffic forecasting 4 24 32 60 $8,160.00 4.5 Existing conditions and No-Build traffic analysis 2 8 28 48 86 $11,920.00 4.6 Access spacing review 2 8 24 34 $4,380.00 4.7 Document existing and future deficiencies 8 24 24 56 $8,000.00 4.8 Identify and evaluate alternatives 2 8 24 32 66 $9,460.00 4.9 Traffic Analysis and Recommendations Technical Memorandum 4 16 20 $3,240.00 5.0 Corridor Recommendations 8 8 88 204 152 0 0 460 $64,380.00 5.1 Conceptual layouts and typical sections (6) 32 40 72 $9,240.00 5.2 Conceptual intersection design 2 2 40 40 84 $11,090.00 5.3 Alternatives Evaluation Matrix 2 4 4 10 $1,580.00 5.4 Layout for Preferred Alternative 2 4 64 120 64 254 $35,980.00 5.5 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2 2 8 4 16 $2,470.00 5.6 Corridor Study Report 4 16 4 24 $4,020.00 PROJECT TOTAL HOURS 72 56 260 204 340 72 18 1022 Hourly Billing Rates 270.00$ 190.00$ 155.00$ 145.00$ 115.00$ 100.00$ 85.00$ DIRECT LABOR $19,440 $10,640 $40,300 $29,580 $39,100 $7,200 $1,530 $147,790 SUBTOTAL LABOR COST 147,790.00 Direct Expenses: Mileage $100.00 Traffic count video data processing $1,750.00 Printing fees and postage $250.00 SUBTOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $2,100.00 PROJECT COST NOT TO EXCEED Notes: (1) Assumes a seven-month project duration (May 2026 through December 2026) (2) Assumes an in-person meeting on a monthly basis. Hours represent every third month charged to this project (2 meetings total). (3) Assumes a kickoff meeting and two additional meetings with County staff. Hours include preparation of agendas and minutes. (4) Assumes three in-person meetings at City Hall or Farmington High School. (5) Assumes two in-person meetings with property owners. (6) Includes up to 3 corridor layouts with typical sections. $149,890.00 Task Description Hours TASK TOTAL COST Alliant Engineering TEAM TOTAL Pa g e 7 1 o f 4 5 4 Page 72 of 454 FLAGSTAFF AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY LOCATION CITY JURISDICTION COUNTY JURISDICTION REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager Department: Community Development Subject: Adopt Ordinance 2026-005 Rezoning Property from MUCI (Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial) to I (Industrial); the Subject Property is Generally located at the Northeast Intersection of Pilot Knob Road and 208th Street West Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: The City of Farmington is seeking to rezone a portion of a parcel of land adjacent to Pilot Knob Road from Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial (MUCI) to Industrial (I). Please note the attached location map labeled as Exhibit A. The existing zoning map is attached as Exhibit B. DISCUSSION: The parcel the City is seeking to rezone is: PID# 14-02500-57-011 (the western 553 feet), owned by Santacruz Holdings, LLC This parcel is currently split zoned with the western 553 feet being zoned Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial (MUCI) and the eastern 765 feet being zoned Industrial (I). The subject property is owned by Santacruz Holdings, LLC, who applied for and received Planning Commission approval on May 12, 2026 of a site plan (attached as Exhibit C) to get this parcel "pad ready". The site plan, labeled as Phase 1, includes the onsite grading work and installation of the stormwater management systems. The split zoning of the parcel creates unintended challenges for the development of the site as the allowed uses are not the same within both zoning classifications. Rezoning this parcel would allow for easier development of the site while also allowing uses that are consistent with the adjacent industrial uses to the south and east of this property. The property to be rezoned is guided as Mixed-Use (Commercial/Industrial) within the City's comprehensive plan. This guidance allows for the integration of commercial and industrial land uses which are compatible with each other. Staff is comfortable leaving this guidance in place until approval of the 2050 update as it does contemplate industrial uses. Page 73 of 454 Planning Commission The Planning Commission reviewed the rezone request and held a public hearing at its May 12th regular meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezone with a vote of 4-0. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Ordinance 2026-005 Amending Title 10 of the Farmington City Code, the Farmington Zoning Ordinance, Rezoning the western 553 feet of the Parcel with PID Number 14-02500- 57-011 from MUCI (Mixed-Use Commercial/Industrial) to I (Industrial). ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Exhibit B - Zoning Map Exhibit C - Phase 1 Site Plan Ord 2026-005 Page 74 of 454 m m Page 75 of 454 200TH ST W 190TH ST W 213TH ST W FL A G S T A F F A V E 1 9 3 R D S T W UPPER 18 2 N D S T W 18 0 T H ST W 18 7TH ST W P I L O T K N O B R D A K I N R D 220TH ST W ELM ST SPRUCE ST V E R M I L L I O N R I V E R T R L CH I P P E N D A L E A V E EN G L I S H A V E DU N B URYAVE E M B E R S A V E 4T H S T DEN M A RK AVE EC H O D R 195TH ST W 190 TH S T W 200 T H S T W E V E R H I L L A V E 198TH S T W 208TH ST W 212TH ST W EA T O N A V E MAPLE ST 6T H S T 11 T H S T 13 T H S T HERITAGE WAY 224TH ST W 208TH ST W 198TH ST W 199TH ST W 1 9 2 N D S T W ASH ST PI L O T K N O B R D FL A G S T A F F A V E 206TH ST W 203RD ST W D U L U T H S T E V E R E S T P A T H 190TH ST W 1 9 3 R D S T W 185TH ST W E M B R Y A V E ENGLI S H A V E D E E R B R O O K E PATH PINE ST 15 T H S T SPRUCE ST Prepared on:4/28/2026 ± R-1 (Low Density Residential) R-2 (Low/ Medium Density Residential) R-3 (Medium Density Residential) R-4 (High Density Residential) R-D (Downtown Residential) B-1 (Highway Business) B-2 (Downtown Business) B-3 (General Business) SSMU (Spruce Street Mixed- Use) MUCI (Mixed- Use Commercial/ Industrial) I (Industrial) A-1 (Agriculture) P/OS (Parks/ Open Space) Spruce Street Overlay Highway 3 Overlay Downtown Commercial Overlay Zoning Map Page 76 of 454 Area to be rezoned Exhibit B C. S . A . H . N O . 3 1 ( P I L O T K N O B R O A D ) 208TH STREET WEST 30 30 30 2 0 30 40 40 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1451609 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1451609 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1503949 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1704350 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1704350 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1704350 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1451609 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1704350 10 0 . 0 0 10 0 . 0 0 PUBLIC ROADWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2368307 25 FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2368308 2 5 53 3 . 0 0 2 5 NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 114, RANGE 20 EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 114, RANGE 20 NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 444.33 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 114, RANGE 20 15'' RCP 21'' RCP 48 ' ' A R C H R C P 36 ' ' R C P 12'' PVC 12'' PVC 16'' DIP 16'' DIP 16 ' ' D I P 24 ' ' D I P 24 ' ' D I P 24 ' ' D I P R:912.72 EI:903.22 R:911.68 EI:902.28 R:911.74 EI:901.64 R:907.89 EI:900.69 12'' PVC R:908.8 EI:898.8 FES EI:902.2 FES EI:902.5 R:908.61 EI:902.81 R:906.7 R:908.97 EI:902.97 R:909.30 EI:903.20 R:907.37 EI:902.77 R:907.34 EI:903.14 R:907.16 EI:903.00 R:907.36 EI:902.86 R:907.33 EI:903.53 R:907.47 EI:903.27 R:907.45 EI:902.45 R:907.70 EI:903.30 R:907.82 EI:904.02 R:908.58 EI:904.58 R:910.99 EI:906.69 R:911.04 EI:906.44 R:910.94 EI:905.34R:911.88 EI:907.88 R:911.83 EI:908.03 24'' RCP FES EI:905.0 R: 9 1 0 . 7 R: 9 1 0 . 8 R: 9 1 0 . 6 FES EI:905.0 R: 9 1 1 . 9 R: 9 1 2 . 8 R: 9 1 2 . 8 15'' RCP EDGE O F W E T L A N D EDGE OF WETLAND E D G E O F W E T L A N D EDG E O F WET L A N D WETLAND SHOWN PER 2025 DELINEATION BY PINNACLE ENGINEERING FEMA FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA FLOOD MAP FEMA FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA FLOOD MAP FEMA FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA FLOOD MAP FEMA FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA FLOOD MAP FEMA FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA FLOOD MAP BITUMINOUS SURFACE BI T U M I N O U S S U R F A C E S89°39'17"E 30.00 N0 ° 2 0 ' 4 3 " E 14 2 . 0 0 N89°39'17"W 30.00 37 5 . 7 5 Δ=4°11'56" R=1834.86 134.47 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R CO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R CO N C R E T E C U R B & G U T T E R 909 GVW GVW GVW GVW GVW SERV SERV TNH 912.29 TNH 915.33 TNH 914.10 TNH 914.08 TNH 911.38 TNH 912.65 C.O. C.O. C.O. PP 30' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER 50' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER 30' MINIMUM WETLAND BUFFER 50' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER 904 906 908 912 914 904 90 6 9 0 8 906 9 1 0 908 9 1 2 9 1 0 9 0 8 9 0 8 9 1 0 9 1 0 9 0 8 90 4 90 5 9 0 4 9 0 5 912 910 912 910 90891 2 91 2 91 1 90 7 90 8 908 90 6 9 0 4 904 905 906 907 908 910 911 90 9 9 0 9 905 9 0 7 9 0 9 9 0 8 9 0 7 9 0 6 9 0 8 9 0 7 9 0 6 9 0 5 905 904 907 909 910 911 913 9 1 3 9 1 1 9 0 9 9 0 9 9 0 7 90 7 90 6 907 905 9 0 9 9 1 0 914 91 3 914 9 1 1 913 912 9 1 1 9 0 9 910 909 910 9 0 9 208TH STREET WEST 68 52 39 40 41 43 42 55 4 12 13 14 22 19 20 18 17 1621 15 28 26 27 3031 3237 36 69 Farmington, MN 55024 25256.5 DD's Onyx Farmington Industrial - Phase One 59311 Revisions No.Description Date DATE PROJECT # PROJECT STATUS DRAWN BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Date Lic. No. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN Licensee 2026-03-13 WH KAB 2026-03-13 25256.5 © 2026 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com City Submittal 03/13/2026 C2.0 OVERALL GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Pa g e 7 7 o f 4 5 4 Exhibit C CI T Y OF FA R M I N G T O N DA K O T A CO U N T Y , MI N N E S O T A OR D I N A N C E 20 2 6 - 0 0 5 AN OR D I N A N C E AM E N D I N G TI T L E 10 OF TH E FA R M I N G T O N CI TY C TH E FA R M I N G T O N ZO N I N G OR D I N A N C E , RE Z O N I N G TH E WE S T E R N 5 5 3 F E E TOF TH E PA R C E L WI T H TH E PI D NU M B E R 14 - 0 2 5 0 0 - 5 7 - 0 1 1 FR O M MU C I (M IX E D-U S E CO M M E R C I A L / I N D U S T R I A L ) TO I (I N D U S T R I A L ) Th e Ci t y Co u n c i l of th e Ci t y of Fa r m i n g t o n or d a i n s : SE C T I O N 1. Se c t i o n 10 - 5 — 1 of th e Fa r m i n g t o n Ci t y Co d e is am e n d e d by re z o n i ng th e we s t e r n 55 3 fe e t of th e pr o p e r t y de p i c t e d on th e at t a c h e d Afr o m MU C I (M i x e d - U s e Co m m e r c i a l / I n d u s t r i a l ) to | (I n d u s t r i a l ) . SE C T I O N 2. Th e Zo n i n g Ma p of th e Ci t y of Fa r m i n g t o n , ad o p t e d un de r Se c ti o n10 — 5- l of th e Fa r m i n g t o n Ci t y Co d e , sh a l l be re p u b l i s h e d to sh o w af o r e sa i d zo n i n g . SE C T I O N 3. EF F E C T I V E DA T E . Th i s or d i n a n c e sh a l l be ef f e c t i v e up on it s pa s s a g e an d pu b l i c a t i o n ac c o r d i n g to la w . Pa s s e d by th e Ci t y Co u n c i l of th e Ci t y of Fa r m i n g t o n , Mi n n e s o t a , t18 ‘ “da y of Ma y 20 2 6 . AT T E S T : li s s oGe i s , Ci t y Cl e r k N ic h ol as Li e n , Ma y o r Page 78 of 454 Di s c l a i me r : Ma p an d pa r c e l da t a ar e be l i e v e d tobe ac c u r a t e , bu t ac c u r a c y isno t gu a r a n t e e d . Ma p Sc a l e M Th i s isno t ale g a l do c u m e n t an d sh o u l d no t be su b s t i t u t e d fo r ati t l e se a r c h , a p p r a i s a l , su r v e y , or1in c h =80 0 fe e t fo r zo n i n g ve r i f i c a t i o n . 5/ 1 3/ 2 0 2 6 "x x S ub je et Pr a p e my I Pi n e Kn o l L P a -ax. -.. E x h i A 4 RN a. .P n r v t é a ‘- ma o x m o z n vé . » om mO Z X H0 4 5 Mi d d l e C r e e k m> < ZO H < m 2 1 2 «T H ST W I1 } “I ! I_ | \\ \\ \\ \ u .g u , ;T -n v. . 5’ : Page 79 of 454 I A“ . \- .. , ‘ |. I, Zo n i gap FA R B- l (n g h w a y Bu s i n e s s ) B- Z (D o w n t o w n Bu s i n e s s ] SS M U (S p r u c e St r u m Mi x e d Us e ) MU C I (M i x e d - Us e Co m m e r c i a l / In d u s t r i a l ) I (I n d u s t r i a l ) R 1 (L o w De n s l t y Re s de n t ] I R- 2 (L o w / Me d i u m R- 3 (M e d i u De n s i t y Re s de n t i a ) R 4 (l l l g h De n s l t y Re s dc n t l a l R. D (D o w n t o w n Re s u d e n t i a l um u ._ {a "x [A g r i c u l t u r e ] P/ O S [ Pa r k s / Op e n Sp a c e ) 0v ¢ rl a y Hi g h w a y 3 Ov e r l a y Do w n t o w n Co m m e r c al Ov e r l a y nu . ) - 1 un ; .9 . '4 . . . “ m ci t bu n . P le o a r e d on4/ 2 8 / 20 2 6 .. .C ‘ ' I ll m l ms h . mg g u a u e u v C J T u o n 2w m . ’3 ! . w 53 1 2 Page 80 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Deanna Kuennen, Community & Economic Development Director Department: Community Development Subject: Resolution 2026-047 Accepting an Offer and Authorizing the Sale of Property Located at 19799 Embers Avenue Parcel ID: 14-56801-01-010 Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: The City Council is requested to consider accepting a bid for the sale of the City-owned single-family residential lot located on Embers Avenue. DISCUSSION: discuss to session work closed a held staff’s City the 2026, 6, April On Council recommendation to sell the City-owned property located at 19799 Embers Avenue (Parcel ID: 14-56801-01-010). Staff determined the property does not provide value for park, roadway, or other public purposes. Following discussion, City Council directed staff to list the property for sale at the current appraised value. The listing agent subsequently received an offer to purchase the property. Staff will bring the offer forward for discussion during a closed work session at 6:00 p.m. on May 18, 2026, to review the offer terms and receive direction from City Council regarding whether to proceed. Following the closed session, City Council may direct Staff to move the offer forward for formal consideration and possible action at the May 18, 2026, City Council meeting. If City Council directs staff not to proceed, this item will be removed from the agenda for consideration. terms the under property the of sale offer approve would the of Acceptance the presented and authorize staff to proceed with preparation of the necessary documents and actions to facilitate the closing process. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution 2026-047 Accepting an Offer and Authorizing the Sale of Property Located at 19799 Embers Avenue Parcel ID: 14-56801-01-010, authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to execute all necessary documents to complete the transaction. Page 81 of 454 ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2026-047 Page 82 of 454 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-047 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AN OFFER AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CITY- OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19799 EMBERS AVENUE (PARCEL ID: 14-56801-01-010) WHEREAS, the City of Farmington (“City”) is the owner of certain real property located at 19799 Embers Avenue, Farmington, Minnesota, legally described as Parcel ID: 14-56801-01-010 (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the status of the Property during a closed work session on April 6, 2026, and determined the Property is not needed for park, roadway, or other public purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to list the Property for sale at the current appraised value; and WHEREAS, the City’s listing agent received an offer to purchase the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a closed session on May 18, 2026, to discuss the offer and provide direction to staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to accept the offer and authorize the sale of the Property in accordance with the terms presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: The City Council hereby accepts the offer for the purchase of the City-owned property located at 19799 Embers Avenue (Parcel ID: 14-56801-01-010), subject to final execution of all necessary closing documents. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to execute all documents necessary to complete the sale of the Property, including but not limited to the purchase agreement, deed, closing documents, and related paperwork, in a form approved by the City Attorney. City Staff is authorized to take all administrative actions necessary to complete the sale and closing process consistent with this Resolution. Page 83 of 454 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this ___ day of ____________, 2026. CITY OF FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA By: _______________________________ Nicholas Lien, Mayor By: _______________________________ Lynn Gorski, City Administrator ATTEST: ____________________________________ Melissa Geis, City Clerk Page 84 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Tony Wippler, Planning Manager Department: Community Development Subject: Pass Resolution 2026-046 Adopting Findings of Fact and Record Decision on the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Attached, for Council's review and consideration are Findings of Fact and a Record Decision for the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet. DISCUSSION: An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared, and is attached, by Swanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC for the Vermillion Reserve residential development project which is being proposed by Lennar Corporation. The EAW was prepared in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. The EAW was prepared to assess any potential impacts of the development and to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed. The proposed development, Vermillion Reserve, is a residential development to be built on the former Adelmann Farm, LLC property located at the southwest intersection of 220th Street W and Denmark Avenue (County Road 31). This property consists of 158.3 acres and was annexed into the City in February of this year. The proposed development would contain up to 370 single-family homes, triggering the need for a mandatory EAW per Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 19D. On February 24, 2026 a notice of availability for the initial EAW was published in the EQB Monitor as well as placed on the city's website. The public review and comment period began with the publishing in the EQB Monitor. The comment period closed on March 26, 2026 and the following agencies provided comment letters: Dakota County Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency National Parks Service Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization Page 85 of 454 Copies of each comment letter and the responses to these comments, are included in the attached Findings of Fact and Record Decision document. The final EAW has been prepared and updated based on these comments received. Based on the EAW, the Response to Comments and Findings of Fact the City, as the RGU, concludes the following: 1. All requirements for environmental review of the proposed project have been met. 2. The EAW and the development process related to the proposed project have generated information which is adequate to determine whether the proposed project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Areas where potential environmental effects have been identified, the City has included proper mitigative responses to be included within the final design of the proposed project. Mitigation will be required to be provided where impacts are expected to result from project construction, operation, or maintenance. Mitigative measures will be required to be incorporated into the proposed project design and have been or will be coordinated with state and federal agencies during the applicable permit process. 4. Based on criteria in Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, the proposed project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed Vermillion Reserve development. ACTION REQUESTED: Pass Resolution 2026-046 Adopting Findings of Fact and Record Decision on the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2026-046 Vermillion Reserve_FindingsofFact_05132026 Final Vermillion Reserve Farmington EAW_05132026 Page 86 of 454 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2026-046 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD DECISION ON THE VERMILLION RESERVE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET WHEREAS, Lennar Corporation (“Project Proposer”) proposes to develop a residential development that will include up to 370 single-family detached homes (“Project”) on approximately 158.3 acres of land generally bound by Eureka Township to the west and south, County Road 31 to the east and 220th Street W to the north, and encompassing the property with the PID Nos. 14-00100-02-012 (“Project Site”), all in the City of Farmington, Minnesota (“City”); and WHEREAS, as a result of common ownership and connected actions, the Project meets the threshold for a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (“EAW”) for residential development pursuant to Minn. R. 4410.4300, Subp. 19D; and WHEREAS, the City is the responsible governmental unit (“RGU”) for preparation of the EAW pursuant to Minn. R. 4410.0500, Subp. 5A; and WHEREAS, the City has received and reviewed the EAW and has forwarded it for comment to various groups, organizations, and individuals as required by law; and WHEREAS, the notice of availability of the EAW for public review for a 30- day comment period was published in the EQB Monitor on February 24, 2026, the City website, and the Dakota County Tribune; and WHEREAS, the thirty (30) day comment period has closed; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and considered reports, letters and comments on the EAW; and WHEREAS, the City Council was provided, for its consideration at its May 18, 2026 meeting, the Finding of Fact and Record Decision for the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet, dated May 13, 2026 (“Record Decision”). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Farmington as follows: 1. The Record of Decision is adopted and incorporated herein. Page 87 of 454 2. Based on the criteria established in Minn. R. 4410.1700, the Record of Decision, and the above Recitals, the Project as proposed does not have the potential for significant environmental effects to trigger the need for an environmental impact Statement (“EIS”). Therefore, a negative declaration is made on the need for an EIS. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, this 18th day of May 2026. ATTEST: ____________________________ ______________________________ Nicholas Lien, Mayor Melissa Geis, City Clerk Page 88 of 454 FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION VERMILLION RESERVE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET City of Farmington Dakota County, MN May 13, 2026 Page 89 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 1 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 2 II. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS .............................................................................................................. 2 a. Agency/Organization Comments and Responses ............................................................................ 3 III. FINDINGS OF FACT ........................................................................................................................... 9 a. Project Description .......................................................................................................................... 9 b. Corrections to the EAW ................................................................................................................... 9 IV. DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.................................. 13 a. Type, Extent and Reversibility of Impacts ...................................................................................... 13 b. Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects ....................................... 13 c. Extent to which Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority ........................................................................................................................................ 13 d. Extent to which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies ................................................................................................................... 14 V. RECORD OF DECISION .................................................................................................................... 15 ATTACHMENT 1. COMMENTS RECEIVED Page 90 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 2 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION VERMILLION RESERVE – ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSEMENT WORKSHEET CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA I. ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND The City of Farmington (“City”) is the Responsible Governmental Unit for this project, and Lennar Corporation (“Lennar”) is the Project Proposer. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for this project (“Proposed Project”) in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. The EAW was developed to assess the potential impacts of the project and other circumstances to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed. The EAW was filed with the Minnesota EQB and circulated for review and comments to the required EAW distribution list. A “Notice of Availability” for the initial EAW was published in the EQB Monitor on February 24, 2026. A Notice of Availability was also published on the City’s website. This notice provided information about the statutorily required public comment process that is used in determining the need for an EIS for the Proposed Project. All comments received during the EAW comment period were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. Comments received during the comment period can be found in Attachment 1 of this document. II. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The public review and comment period for the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) began on February 24, 2026, and was closed on March 26, 2026. The following responses were prepared to address questions and comments received during the public review and comment period. The following agencies provided comment letters, organized alphabetically: Dakota County Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Parks Service (NPS) Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) A copy of each comment letter is included within Attachment 1. Consistent with state environmental rules, responses have been prepared below for all substantive comments received during the comment period. Page 91 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 3 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 a. Agency/Organization Comments and Responses Agency Commenter Date Topic/Item Summary of Comments Response National Parks Service Holly Henriksen 3/13/2026 Agencies with jurisdiction • Since this project is outside of the administrative Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, NPS will not be providing comments. Comment noted. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Chris Green, Project Manager 3/18/2026 Item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience • Table 3. With the increased impervious area, adaptations related to chloride use would be appropriate with the increased chances of freeze/thaw cycles. Comment noted. Added adaptation to Table 3. Item 9. Permits and Approvals required • Table 7. The Vermillion River JPO could be added Comment noted. Added VRWJPO to Table 7. Item 12. Water Resources (impairments) • Include the fish and invertebrate impairments for the Vermillion River. Include the impairments for -527. Including which list you consulted (most recent is 2024). All three streams are trout streams. Comment noted. Added Vermillion River and stream -527 impairments. Added text indicating all three streams are trout streams. Added reference for impairment information. Item 12. Water Resources (stormwater) • Section 12.b.ii. Stormwater: o With the increase of impervious area and the proximity to a trout stream, special considerations should be incorporated for chloride and temperature. Potential for increased use of chloride during freeze/thaw cycles. • Designing the development with winter in mind may help use less salt and protect the stream from chloride impairment. • Cold climate challenges in stormwater BMP engineering and design, Minnesota Stormwater Manual. • Downstream sections of the Vermillion River are at high risk of becoming impaired for chloride (see Minnesota Chloride Management Plan). Potential of increased temperature of runoff to the trout stream due to precipitation interaction with impervious surface. Comment noted. Added text to section 12.b.ii. Item 12. Water Resources (wastewater) • Section 12.b.i. Wastewater: o This section states that the wastewater from the project will be discharged to a Met Council Environmental Services interceptor sewer to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant. Additional discussion should be included about the available capacity of the interceptor and the treatment plant, their capability of accepting the additional flow, and whether any upgrades of the existing infrastructure is needed. Comment noted. The text has been modified to indicate that wastewater will be discharged to a proposed municipal sanitary sewer stub on 220th Street W. Wastewater is ultimately discharged to the Empire WWTP. Information about the available capacity of the WWTP is provided. No upgrades to the existing interceptor or treatment capacity will be required due to this development. Pa g e 9 2 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 4 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 Agency Commenter Date Topic/Item Summary of Comments Response Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) Jeff Dunn, Water Resources Engineer 3/2/2026 Item 6. Project Description • City Council has adopted an annexation ordinance that has been filed and an administrative law judge is currently reviewing the annexation petition and ordinance. The VRM has no comments provided the development is ultimately annexed into the City. Comment noted. Metropolitan Council Todd Graham 3/23/2026 Item 9. Permits and Approvals Required • The Project Site was not considered as Farmington urban reserve in the Met Council’s Imagine 2050 forecast preparation. The City of Farmington plans to address this in a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Council staff expect that the Vermillion Reserve development fits within the 2030 and 2040 timepoint forecasts approved by Met Council at its February 25, 2026 meeting which expect 92,00 households and 26,000 population in 2030 and 10,100 households and 27,600 population in 2040. Council staff advise a discussion of forecasts during the City’s preparation of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Comment noted. Population and household forecasts will be addressed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. MacKenzie Young- Walters Item 10. Land Use • Project Proposer should consult the 2026 MUSA Implementation Guidelines to verify that final project’s net residential density will fall within the proposed 3.5 to 6 unit per acre range established for the proposed Low Medium Density land use. Comment noted. Added Table 8 which calculates the estimated net residential density based on the concept plan. Colin Kelly Item 10. Land Use - Parks • Council Parks & Trails staff appreciate the project’s intent to protect 31 acres of open space and 3.1 acres of wetlands, provide 4 acres of park space, and develop sidewalks and trails that will connect the neighborhood to the surrounding area. Comment noted. Joe Widing Item 20. Transportation • The attached traffic study (Appendix G) indicates that 220th Street and 225th Street will see increased traffic volumes from this proposed development, functioning as unpaved collector roadways. Unpaved roadways cannot be classified above local according to Federal Highway Administration guidelines. The study does not identify the paving of these roadways in its planned improvements. If they are not already planning to, the developer or city should pave these roadways within the proposed development. Additionally, if the City would like these streets to be considered for reclassification as collector roadways, they will need to be paved. Comments noted. The developer will continue to coordinate with the city regarding roadway improvements to 220th and/or 225th streets. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Melissa Collins 3/26/2026 Item 10. Land Use • Development within the shoreland overlay district of the Vermillion River should be consistent with the local shoreland ordinance. Comment noted. It is noted in the EAW that the project will be subject to shoreland management regulations set forth in City Code. Item 12. Water Resources – Stormwater • Stormwater ponds on project plans are shown in close proximity to the Vermillion River. Any stormwater outfalls proposed into the river would require a DNR Public Waters Work Permit. As a designated trout stream, the Vermillion River is highly sensitive to water temperatures. Any warm water discharge from stormwater ponds could be problematic. Comment noted. It has been noted in the Final EAW that stormwater pond outfalls to the Vermillion River are highly discouraged. It is noted that outfalls to the river, if any, will require a DNR Public Waters Work Permit. Pa g e 9 3 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 5 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 Agency Commenter Date Topic/Item Summary of Comments Response • The DNR recommends that stormwater be used for the irrigation of landscaping. The re- use of stormwater for irrigation will reduce the volume of stormwater and stormwater pollution flowing downstream of the site. In addition, using stormwater for landscaping irrigation will conserve valuable groundwater for household use. We also recommend that native seed mixes and plants be used to the greatest extent possible in project landscaping and stormwater ponds to provide pollinator habitat. Comment noted. Recommendation added to potential stormwater mitigations. Native plantings are recommended in Item 7. Table 3., and Item 14. • The proposed project would significantly increase the amount of impervious surfaces within the project area, and consequently the amount of road salt used for winter maintenance. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Comment noted. Recommendation added to Item 12. Water Resources – stormwater. Item 12. Water Resources – Water Appropriation • A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is required if the water pumped exceeds 10,000 gallons in a day, or one million gallons in one year. The DNR General Permit for Temporary Appropriation, with its lower permit application fee and reduced time for review, may be used for the dewatering if the dewatering volume is less than 50 million gallons and the time of the appropriation is less than 1 year. • Given the proximity to the Vermillion River, a designated trout stream, any proposed appropriations will be examined for the potential to impact the trout stream. If the proposed appropriation is close to the trout stream, temporary appropriations may need to be subject to the Trout Stream Exclusion season, which is September 1 to April 1. Comment noted. Permits are noted in Item 12. Water Resources – Water Appropriation, and Table 7. Added potential for appropriations to be subject to trout stream exclusion period. Item 16. Visual • The project area is located within the shoreland of the Vermillion River and project lighting should be chosen with care. Comment noted. Added recommendation to select MnDOT approved luminaries to Item 14. Dakota County Georg Fischer 3/26/2026 Item 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience, Table 3 • Water reuse and conservation efforts align with the Dakota County Groundwater Plan. In addition, consider encouraging the installation of low-input, drought-tolerant turf species – such as fescue grass – in place of traditional lawn blends. Comment noted. Added recommendation to install low-input, drought-tolerant turf species to Table 3. Item 9. Permits and Approvals, Table 7 • Under Dakota County, “well construction” permits should be added for any dewatering wells. “Well abandonment” should be changed to “well sealing”. Comment noted. Added well construction to Dakota County section of table. Changed well abandonment to well sealing in table and in document. Item 11. Geology, Soils, and Topography/ Landforms • Statement that project site has low sensitivity to pollution is not accurate. The project site is mapped as highly sensitive to pollution with a small portion on the west side mapped as moderate. Comment noted. Corrected text in this section to indicate that site is highly sensitive to pollution. Item 12. Water Resources – Groundwater • Due to vulnerability of groundwater to contamination, efforts should be made to minimize the use of chemicals in the project area. Comment noted. Added adaptation to Table 3. Pa g e 9 4 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 6 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 Agency Commenter Date Topic/Item Summary of Comments Response • There are 6 wells on the site that must be found and sealed by a licensed well contractor. Please make sure to take advantage of demolition dates and coordinate with Dakota County well inspectors to locate wells as soon as possible to avoid costly excavation after redevelopment has already begun. Of the 7 wells on the property, only 1 has been sealed. Comment noted. Information about 7 wells has been added to the Final EAW. • Construction crews should be notified of the presence of several wells and any wells encountered should be protected from damage and contamination. If any wells not listed are discovered during site visits and/or during redevelopment, they should be examined by a licensed well contractor or a Dakota County well inspector to determine status. Comment noted. Information added to Final EAW. • If a real estate sale is occurring, it is in the best interest of both parties that a well disclosure be filed if appropriate and any well compliance issues be resolved. Comment noted. Item 20. Transportation • Roadway and right-of-way requirements o 220th Street W (future CSAH 745): Planned as a 4-lane facility, requiring dedication of 75 feet of half of right-of-way o CR 31 (Denmark Ave): Planned as a 3-lane facility, requiring dedication of 60 feet of half of right-of-way. Comments noted. • Access management o Access points to existing and future County highways are generally consistent with current conditions and the county’s access spacing guidelines. o The northeastern-most access to 220th Street W may be limited to restricted access. o Final access determinations will be provided upon submission of a preliminary plat prior to site development. Comments noted. • Local street network o The site should provide multiple internal east-west local street connections. Relying on a single connection increases local trip demand on the County highway system. Comment noted. The gas line utility easement prevents multiple east-west connections across the site. • Pedestrian and trail connectivity o Trails should be incorporated with the development along 220th Street W and CR 31 to support pedestrian access to nearby destinations, including Boeckman Middle School, located ¼ mile north o The County and City are coordinating the reconstruction of CR 31 from CSAH 50 to 220th Street W, which will include trails on both sides with the dedicated pedestrian crossings. o Expanding the trail network is essential to support safe and convenient pedestrian movement. Comments noted. The Proposer will coordinate with the City and County on incorporation of trails through the platting process. • Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) comments Pa g e 9 5 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 7 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 Agency Commenter Date Topic/Item Summary of Comments Response o The TIA previously used the NCHRP Intersection Channelization Guide to assess right- turn lane requirements. Instead, the MnDOT Right Turn Lane Analysis Checks should be applied. o Right turn lanes will be required for all public access points to the County highways, based on the scale of the proposed development. o The County’s standard turn lane dimensions are 300 feet of full-width storage with a 180-foot taper. Comment noted. The resubmittal examines MnDOT turn lane guidance. The resubmitted TIA includes text indicating that the County’s standard turn lane dimensions are 300 feet of full- width storage with a 180-foot taper. o Left turn lane requirements will be evaluated with the development TIA review after corrections and with the permit process. Comment noted. o Thirteen-hour traffic counts are required for intersection control warrant analysis; the TIA currently includes only 4-hour data. Please coordinate with County Transportation staff to re-evaluate the warrant analysis. Comment noted. The resubmitted TIA uses 13-hour traffic counts for the signal warrant analysis and adds extrapolated time-of-day development trips. o The TIA must incorporate the County’s ongoing CR 31 reconstruction planning. County staff will provide traffic study data from the preliminary engineering phase to support the TIA and accurately assess development impacts at corridor intersections, including CR 31/CSAH 74. Comment noted. The resubmitted TIA incorporates coordination with County staff regarding the reconstruction. o The TIA indicates failing delay levels at the CR 31/CSAH 74 intersection based on Synchro forecast. County staff recommend using a microsimulation model to provide more realistic delay estimates. For planning purposes, assume westbound left-turn, thru, and right-turn lanes on CSAH 74 will be required. Coordinate with County Transportation staff for further details. Comment noted. The resubmitted TIA incorporates the lane configuration suggested by County staff. Tyler Krage Item 20. Transportation • Access on 31 makes sense based off of undivided highways over 45 mph and under 1500 2040 ADT, assuming they’re meeting the existing access points on the other side of 31. On 74, amenable to the RIRO option knowing that they have an access just to the south servicing nearly the same area but would still want to avoid a similar situation with the median RIRO at 64/Meadowview. Would that then mean that the SBL on the north side of 220th would have to do the U-turn? If 74 is a long way from becoming a principal, I don’t think it’s super necessary at this time to restrict that, especially with the north side already open. Comment noted. Traffic Engineer agrees since 1) the northbound left to Access C is very low (single digits per hour), and 2) will operate at LOS A for all hours of the day. No action taken. • The TIA used an NHCRP study to determine the right turn need. Please use the MnDOT Right Turn Lane analysis checks on these instead. Comment noted. The resubmittal examines MnDOT turn lane guidance. • For documentation purposes, the TIA should have the County’s Spacing guidelines illustrated and denoted that the guidance is met. Comment noted. The resubmittal cites County access spacing standards. Pa g e 9 6 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 8 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 Agency Commenter Date Topic/Item Summary of Comments Response • The TIA should be collecting 13-hour data for the warrant check (they did 4 hours). We can provide this data to them, but the big point is that the warrants should be evaluating the 13- hour (and extrapolating from the AM/PM/Daily over the course of the day) to provide estimated warrant numbers. With the assumption that County utilizes the 8-hour warrant. Comment noted. The resubmitted TIA uses 13-hour traffic counts for the signal warrant analysis and adds extrapolated time-of-day development trips. • The TIA has failing delay numbers at 31/74, but the numbers should be using simtraffic (not just synchro) or other microsimulation to model this, as it creates a more realistic delay estimation. For the time being, the model can assume a combined WBT/WBL lane and a separate WBR lane. Comment noted. The resubmittal examines separate westbound right turn lane and uses SimTraffic for queue link. • Can you send us the synchro files for this as a record on our end? Especially if the scope does enable Simtraffic, as least we can check those numbers to see the realistic delays at 31/74. Comment noted. Synchro and SimTraffic have been submitted separately to the County via email. Pa g e 9 7 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 9 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 III. FINDINGS OF FACT a. Project Description The Proposed Project, Vermillion Reserve, is a residential development in the City of Farmington, Minnesota. The development will be built on approximately 158.3 acres and will be developed with up to 370 single-family detached units, outdoor community gathering spaces, stormwater management areas, and curvilinear roads. The Project is proposed to be constructed in four phases, beginning with site grading, and buildout of units adjacent to 220th Street with associated infrastructure in 2026, followed by development to the south anticipated in phases until 2033. Four gas pipeline utility easements run diagonally north-south through the center of the Project Site with development proposed outside of the gas pipeline easement area. The gas pipeline easement area comprises approximately 28.7 acres of the site that may not be developed as part of the Project and uses will be restricted in compliance with the terms of the easement. An east-west local roadway is proposed to cross the gas pipeline easements, which will provide connection across the Project Site and provide the necessary access for the new neighborhoods to existing roadways. An agreement to cross the gas pipeline easement with the access road will be required as part of the land use and development permit process. An ordinance permitting annexation of the Project Site from Eureka Township was adopted by the City of Farmington. Certified copies of the annexation ordinance were filed with the appropriate agencies, and an Administrative Law Judge issued an order approving the annexation, filed on February 25, 2026. b. Corrections to the EAW • Throughout document: references to a future annexation have been edited to indicate that an order approving the annexation ordinance was issued by an Administrative Law Judge, filed February 25, 2026. • Item 6. Project Description and Item 10. Land Use have been updated to reflect that an order approving the annexation ordinance was issued and filed February 25, 2026. • Table 3 is amended to include the following: o Project Design adaptations: With increased impervious area and increased chances of freeze/thaw cycles, adaptations related to chloride use should be considered. Consider the installation of low-input, drought-tolerant turf species, such as fescue grass, in place of traditional lawn blends. • Water Resources adaptations: Due to the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination, efforts should be made to minimize the use of chemicals in the Project area. Page 98 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 10 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 • Table 7 is amended to include the following: Unit of Government Type of Application Status State Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) Watershed and Land Disturbance Plan Review To be applied for Dakota County Well Sealing To be applied for Well Construction for Dewatering To be applied for, if needed • Added Table 8. Concept Plan Land Use Summary: FUTURE LAND USE REQUIRED DENSITY (DU/ac) USES # OF DWELLING UNITS NET AREA (acres) DENSITY (DU/ac) Low/Medium Density Residential 3.5 to 6.0 40-ft lots 116 96.5 3.83 50-ft lots 87 55-ft lots 121 65-ft lots 46 Wetlands - - - 3.1 - Gas Line Easement - - - 28.7 - Arterial R/W (future) - - - 3.7 - Public Parks1 - - - 4.0 - Stormwater Ponds1 - - 22.3 - TOTAL - - 370 158.3 - 1 Parks and stormwater pond areas dedicated to the city are estimated and will be finalized during the platting process. • Item 11.a. Geology was corrected to indicate that according to DNR “Pollution Sensitivity of Near- Surface Materials” mapping, the Project Site has high sensitivity to pollution. • Item 12.a.i. Surface Water is edited to include the following: Impairments The Vermillion River, immediately adjacent to the northwest corner of the Project Site, is designated as impaired for aquatic recreation (fecal coliform), aquatic consumption (mercury in fish tissue), and aquatic life (fish bioassessments, benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen). Unnamed Stream 07040001-527 is designated as impaired for aquatic recreation (fecal coliform), and aquatic life (benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments, dissolved oxygen, fish bioassessments, and total suspended solids). Trout Streams The Vermillion River which flows through the northwest corner of the Project Site is designated as a trout stream, as well as Unnamed Streams 07040001-527 and 0704001-667. These streams have special regulations catch and release for brown trout (January 1 through Friday before trout opener, and September 15 to October 15), and statewide regulations for rainbow trout. Floodplain The northeastern portion of the Project Site is near but outside the special flood hazard area of the Vermillion River. Page 99 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 11 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 • Item 12.a.ii. Groundwater is edited to include the following: The Minnesota Department of Health Well Index and Dakota County well records identify seven (7) existing wells on the Project Site of which one well has been sealed. Several additional wells within one-half mile of the Project Site are identified in the MN Well Index and are shown in Appendix A – Figure 16. If any undocumented wells are discovered during site visits and/or during redevelopment, they should be examined by a licensed well contractor or a Dakota County well inspector to determine status, construction crews should be notified of their presence, and the wells should be protected from damage and contamination. Dakota County can help locate and mark wells using a magnetometer by calling (952) 891-7537. A Dakota County well inspector must be present during any well searches to rule out the presence of a well. If any wells are determined to not have future use, proper procedures will be followed to have the wells sealed by a licensed well contractor. Sealing must meet MDH well-sealing requirements. • Edited Table 14. Documented Wells on Project Site WELL ID STATUS YEAR DRILLED DESCRIPTION 410934 Sealed 1997 4-inch drinking water well 608179 Not sealed 1985 4-inch drinking water well 207519 In Use 1969 12-inch irrigation well W05649 Not sealed Unknown 1.25-inch drinking water well from 4758 220th Street W05650 Not sealed Unknown 1.25-inch drinking water well from 4752 220th Street W05651 Not sealed Unknown 1.25-inch drinking water well from 4746 220th Street W05999 Not sealed Unknown 6-inch agricultural well • Item 12.b.i.1) Wastewater is edited to include the following: A proposed City of Farmington project will improve 220th Street W and extend sanitary sewer and watermain along the north boundary of the Project Site. These mains will include stubs to serve the development. The proposed municipal sanitary sewer will ultimately connect to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Lakeville-Farmington Interceptor (#7103-1) which provides wastewater collection service to the southwest Farmington area. Wastewater from Farmington is discharged to and treated at the Empire Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). Based on the most recent sanitary sewer extension permit, existing capacity at the Empire WWTP is 28.61 MGD while actual current average daily flow in the past 12 months was 11.66 MGD. Beyond extending the municipal sanitary sewer to the site, additional wastewater infrastructure upgrades will not be required. • Item 12.b.ii. Stormwater is edited to include the following: Stormwater Mitigations With the increase of impervious surface area and the proximity to trout streams, special considerations should be incorporated to mitigate effects due to chloride use and increased temperature of runoff. These mitigations may include: Page 100 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 12 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 • Designing the development with winter in mind may help use less salt and protect the stream from chloride impairment. • Reuse of stormwater for irrigation landscaping. • Promoting local business and City participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through MPCA. Outfalls from stormwater ponds to the Vermillion River are strongly discouraged by the DNR. As a designated trout stream, the Vermillion River is highly sensitive to changes in water temperature. Any proposed stormwater outfalls into the Vermillion River would require a DNR Public Waters Work Permit. • Item 12.b.iii. Water Appropriations is edited to include the following: A DNR General Permit for Temporary Appropriation may be used for the dewatering if the dewatering volume is less than 50 million gallons and the time of the appropriation is less than 1 year. • Item 14.c. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources mitigations are edited to include the following: In addition, project lighting should be chosen with care as lighting cycles, direction, and hues can all adversely impact migratory birds and other species. The DNR recommends that any projects using LED luminaries follow the MnDOT Approved Products for Luminaries and select a color temperature below 2700K. • Item 20.b. Transportation, effects of traffic congestion on affected roads, has been edited to include the following: Dakota County has directed that right-turn lanes are required at accesses on County Roads due to the size of the proposed development. Analysis shows that the intersection of Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W is expected to see Levels of Service (LOS) F under the full-build scenario of the Project (year 2030). Projected future volumes, including 13-hour data plus time-of-day extrapolated development trips, indicate that the intersection is expected to meet warrants the following warrants: o Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Volumes Condition A (minimum vehicular volume) Condition A+B o Warrant 2, Four-Hour Volumes • Item 20.c. Transportation, mitigations has been edited to include the following: It is recommended to monitor volumes at the intersection of Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W and implement signalized control when volumes meet warrants. At Denmark Avenue & Accesses C (church/senior living driveway) and D (see Figure 3 of the revised Traffic Impact Study), to construct southbound right-turn lanes with 300 feet of deceleration plus a 180-foot taper. • Traffic Impact Study – REVISED for Vermillion Reserve, dated April 29, 2026, has been attached. Page 101 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 13 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 IV. DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Minnesota Rule 4410.1700 provides that an environmental impact statement shall be ordered for projects that have the potential for significant environmental effects. In deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects, the following factors shall be considered: a. Type, Extent and Reversibility of Impacts The City of Farmington finds that the analysis completed for the EAW is adequate to determine whether the Project has the potential for significant environmental impacts. The EAW described the type and extent of impacts anticipated to result from the Proposed Project. This document provides any corrections, changes, clarifications and new information since the EAW was published, and summarizes the dominant and recurring issues within the EAW. The proposed design for the Project includes features to mitigate the identified impacts. As described in the EAW and within the corrections stated herein, continued coordination with Dakota County with the recommendations from the County Road 31 & County Road 74 study will be required. A comprehensive plan amendment will be required to change the future land use to an urbanized land use, expand the MUSA to serve the Project Site with sanitary sewer, and rezone the property to Low-Medium Density Residential with a PUD overlay. In addition, the Proposer will need to continue to coordinate with the City of Farmington regarding improvements and timing related to 220th Street and 225th Street. b. Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects No cumulative effects were identified during the comment period. The cumulative impacts identified in the EAW, in conjunction with EAW corrections noted herein, were evaluated and determined that if the identified mitigative steps are implemented and all permitting processes are followed that there are no anticipated cumulative environmental impacts as a result of the Proposed Project. c. Extent to which Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with the applicable regulatory agencies. All mitigation efforts will be subject to the plan approval and permitting processes. Permits and approvals that have been obtained, or those that may be required prior to construction, are identified in Table 1. Table 1. Permits and Approvals Required UNIT OF GOVERNMENT TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS Federal US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Clean Waters Act – Wetland Permit Not Anticipated (To be applied for, if required) MPCA 401 Certification, if required State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Construction Permit To be applied for Page 102 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 14 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 UNIT OF GOVERNMENT TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To be applied for Sanitary sewer extension permit To be applied for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) MN Natural Heritage Database Review Complete Dewatering permit To be applied for, if needed Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Water main plan review and water supply connection To be applied for Metropolitan Council Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Approval To be applied for Local City of Farmington Annexation/Annexation Ordinance In Progress, Anticipated Completion Q1 2026 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) To be applied for Rezoning To be applied for Preliminary and Final Plat To be applied for Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Permit To be applied for Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Permits To be applied for Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) Watershed and Land Disturbance Plan Review To be applied for Dakota County Well Sealing To be applied for Well Construction for Dewatering To be applied for, if needed Access Permit To be applied for OTHER – Pipelines Northern Natural Gas Pipeline Encroachment Permit In progress d. Extent to which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies The City of Farmington finds: 1. The Proposed Project is reasonably similar to other residential development projects in the City of Farmington and surrounding area. Other projects of similar scope, accompanied by similar land use, natural resources, surface water, traffic studies, and associated mitigation, have, in general, successfully mitigated potential environmental impacts. 2. The EAW, in conjunction with this document, contains or references the known studies that provide information or guidance regarding environmental effects that can be anticipated and controlled. Page 103 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – EAW 15 City of Farmington, Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | May 13, 2026 3. No EIS that addresses a similarly sized project is known to be available in the City of Farmington or the surrounding area. 4. In light of the results of the environmental review and permitting processes for similar projects, the City of Farmington finds that the environmental effects of the project can be adequately anticipated and controlled. Based on the original EAW, comments received from agencies and individuals, the responses to comments, and the criteria above, the City of Farmington finds that the Vermillion Reserve development does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and does not require the preparation of an EIS. V. RECORD OF DECISION Based on the EAW, the Response to Comments and the Findings of Fact, the City of Farmington concludes the following: 1. All requirements for environmental review of the Proposed Project have been met. 2. The EAW and the development processes related to the Proposed Project have generated information which is adequate to determine whether the Proposed Project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Areas where potential environmental effects have been identified, the City of Farmington has included proper mitigative responses to be included within the final design of the Proposed Project. Mitigation will be required to be provided where impacts are expected to result from project construction, operation, or maintenance. Mitigative measures will be required to be incorporated into the Proposed Project design and have been or will be coordinated with state and federal agencies during the applicable permit process. 4. Based on the criteria in Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, the Proposed Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed Vermillion Reserve development in Farmington, Minnesota. Page 104 of 454 ATTACHMENT 1 COMMENTS RECEIVED Page 105 of 454 Kim Zlimen <kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com> City of Farmington, Dakota County – Vermillion Reserve, Draft EAW NPS MISS Planning <MISS_Planning@nps.gov>Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 12:50 PM To: Kim Zlimen <kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com>, Tony Wippler <TWippler@farmingtonmn.gov> Hello, Thank you for notifying the National Park Service of the availability of review for the Draft EAW for Vermillion Township. Since this project is outside of the administrative Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, we will not be providing any comments. Thank you, Holly Henriksen Planner Phone: 651-293-8470 Email : holly_henriksen@nps.gov Mississippi National River & Recreation Area 111 Kellogg Blvd E, Suite 105 St. Paul MN 55101 www.nps.gov/miss From: Kim Zlimen <kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2026 11:47 AM To: Kim Zlimen <kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com>; Tony Wippler <TWippler@farmingtonmn.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] City of Farmington, Dakota County – Vermillion Reserve, Draft EAW This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. [Quoted text hidden] 3/15/26, 2:26 PM Swanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC Mail - City of Farmington, Dakota County – Vermillion Reserve, Draft EAW https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=13c4d22894&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1859570104196316833&simpl=msg-f:1859570104196316833 1/1Page 106 of 454 March 18, 2026 VIA EMIAL Tom Wippler City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Re: Vermillion Reserve - Environmental Assessment Worksheet Dear Tom Wippler: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Vermillion Reserve project (Project) located in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Project consists of the proposed Project, Vermillion Reserve, is a residential development in Eureka Township, Minnesota. On February 2, 2026, the City of Farmington adopted Ordinance 2026-001 permitting the annexation of the Project Site by ordinance. Certified copies of the ordinance have been filed with the Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the Minnesota Secretary of State, the Dakota County Auditor, and Eureka Township. The Administrative Law Judge is reviewing the annexation petition and the ordinance. The order for the annexation has not yet been issued. The Vermillion Reserve will be built on approximately 158.3 acres and will be developed with up to 370 single-family detached units, stormwater management areas, curvilinear roads, and open spaces. Regarding matters for which the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has regulatory responsibility and other interests, the MPCA staff has the following comments for your consideration. Watershed: • Table 3. With the increased impervious area, adaptations related to chloride use would be appropriate with the increased chances of freeze/thaw cycles. • Table 7: The Vermillion River JPO could be added. • Section 12: o Include the Fish and Invertebrate impairments for the Vermillion River. Include the impairments for -527 Including which impairments have TMDLs would be helpful. o Cite which list you consulted - the most recent is the 2024. o All three streams are trout streams. • Section 12, ii - Stormwater. o With the increase of impervious area and the close proximity to a trout stream, special considerations should be incorporated for chloride and temperature. Potential for increased use of chloride during freeze/thaw cycles. • Designing the development with winter in mind may help use less salt and protecting the stream from chloride impairment. • Cold climate challenges in stormwater BMP engineering and design | Minnesota Stormwater Manual • Downstream sections of the Vermillion River are at High Risk of becoming impaired for chloride Page 107 of 454 Tom Wippler Page 2 March 18, 2026 o Minnesota Chloride Management Plan Potential of increased temperature of runoff to the trout stream due to precipitation interaction with impervious surface. Wastewater: • Section 12, b. i. states that the wastewater from the project with be discharged to a Met Council Environmental Services interceptor sewer to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant. Additional discussion should be included about the available capacity of the interceptor and treatment plant, their capability of accepting the additional flow, and whether any upgrades of the existing infrastructure is needed. We appreciate the opportunity to review this Project. Please be aware that this letter does not constitute approval by the MPCA of any or all elements of the Project for the purpose of pending or future permit actions by the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the Project proposer to secure any required permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. If you have any questions concerning our review of this EAW, please contact me by email at Chris.Green@state.mn.us or by telephone at 507-476-4258. Sincerely, Chris Green This document has been electronically signed. Chris Green Project Manager Environmental Review Unit Resource Management and Assistance Division CG:kj cc: Amy Timm, MPCA Melinda Neville, MPCA Nicole Peterson, MPCA Lauren Dickerson, MPCA Deepa deAlwis, MPCA David Sahli, MPCA Julie Henderson, MPCA Brian Timerson, MPCA Page 108 of 454 Page 109 of 454 Metropolitan Council (Regional Office & Environmental Services) 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 | F 651.602.1550 | TTY 651.291.0904 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer March 23, 2026 Tony Wippler, Planning Manager City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 RE: City of Farmington – Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) – Vermillion Reserve Metropolitan Council Review No. 23185-1 Metropolitan Council District No. 16 Dear Tony Wippler: The Metropolitan Council received the EAW for the Vermillion Reserve project in Farmington on February 20, 2026. The proposed project is located in the northeast corner of Eureka Township, northwest of the intersection of 225th Street West and County Road 31. The proposed development consists of 158.3 acres and will include up to 370 single-family detached homes. The staff review finds that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and does not raise major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Item 9 – Permits and Approval Required (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The EAW covers 158 acres, historically the northern edge of Eureka Township. This land was not previously considered as Farmington urban reserve during Met Council’s Imagine 2050 forecasts preparation. Farmington intends to address this future land supply in a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Council staff expect the Vermillion Reserve development fits within the 2030 and 2040 timepoint forecasts approved by Met Council at its meeting February 25, 2026: Agenda Item. That forecast expects: 9,200 households and 26,200 population in 2030 and 10,100 households and 27,600 population in 2040. Council staff advise a discussion of forecasts during the City’s preparation of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Item 10 – Land Use (MacKenzie Young-Walters, 651-602-1373) Project proposer should consult the 2026 MUSA Implementation Guidelines to verify that final project’s net residential density will fall within the proposed 3.5 to 6 unit per acre range established for the proposed Low Medium Density Land Use. Item 10 – Land Use: Parks (Colin Kelly, 651-602-1361) Council Parks and Trails staff appreciate the project’s intent to protect 31 acres of open space and 3.1 acres of wetlands, provide 4 acres of park space, and develop sidewalks and trails that will connect the neighborhoods to the surrounding area. Page 110 of 454 Page - 2 | March 23, 2026 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Item 20 – Transportation (Joe Widing, 651-602-1822) The attached traffic impact study (appendix G) indicates that 220th Street and 225th Street will see increased traffic volumes from this proposed development functioning as unpaved collector roadways. Unpaved roadways cannot be classified above local according to Federal Highway Administration guidelines. The study does not identify the paving of these roadways in its planned improvements. If they are not already planning to, the developer or city should pave these roadways within the proposed development. Additionally, if the city would like these streets to be considered for reclassified as collector roadways, they will need to be paved. This concludes the Council’s review of the EAW. The Council will not take formal action on the EAW. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact MacKenzie Young-Walters, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1373 or via email at mackenzie.young-walters@metc.state.mn.us. As always, you can also contact your Sector Representative, Patrick Boylan, at 651-602-1538 or via email at patrick.boylan@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division Wendy Wulff, Metropolitan Council District 16 Patrick Boylan, Sector Representative MacKenzie Young-Walters, Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N:\CommDev\LPA\Communities\Farmington\Letters\Farmington 2026 Vermillion Reserve EAW Ok With Comments 23185-1.docx Page 111 of 454 1 Division of Ecological and Water Resources Transmitted by Email Region 3 Headquarters 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 March 26, 2026 Tony Wippler Planning Manager City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Dear Tony Wippler, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Vermillion Reserve Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the project area located in Dakota County. The DNR respectfully submits the following comments for your consideration: 1. Page 18, Land Use. Development within the shoreland overlay district of the Vermillion River (M-049) should be consistent with the local shoreland ordinance. 2. Page 24, Stormwater. Stormwater ponds on project plans are shown in close proximity to the Vermillion River. Any stormwater outfalls proposed into the river would require a DNR Public Waters Work Permit. As a designated trout stream, the Vermillion River is highly sensitive to water temperatures. Any warm water discharge from stormwater ponds could be problematic. 3. Page 24, Stormwater. The DNR recommends that stormwater be used for the irrigation of the of landscaping. The re-use of stormwater for irrigation will reduce the volume of stormwater and stormwater pollution flowing downstream of the site. In addition, using stormwater for landscaping irrigation will conserve valuable groundwater for household use. We also recommend that native seed mixes and plants be used to the greatest extent possible in project landscaping and stormwater ponds to provide pollinator habitat. 4. Page 24, Stormwater. The proposed project would significantly increase the amount of impervious surfaces within the project area, and consequently the amount of road salt used for winter maintenance. Chloride released into local lakes, streams, and groundwater does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private Page 112 of 454 2 companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We encourage cities and counties to consider how they may participate in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. 5. Page 25, Water Appropriation. A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is required if the water pumped exceeds 10,000 gallons in a day, or one million gallons in one year. The DNR General Permit for Temporary Appropriation, with its lower permit application fee and reduced time for review, may be used for the dewatering if the dewatering volume is less than 50 million gallons and the time of the appropriation is less than 1 year. Given the proximity to the Vermillion River, a designated trout stream, any proposed water appropriations will be examined for the potential to impact the trout stream. If the proposed appropriation is close to the trout stream, temporary appropriations may need to be subject to the Trout Stream Exclusion season, which is September 1 to April 1. 6. Page 37, Visual. The project area is located within the shoreland of the Vermillion River and project lighting should be chosen with care. Lighting for the facility will be especially important to limit impacts to migratory birds. Animals depend on the daily cycle of light and dark for behaviors such as hunting, migrating, sleeping, and protection from predators. Light pollution can affect their sensitivity to the night environment and alter their activities. In addition to the undesirable effects of upward facing lighting, the hue of lights can also affect wildlife. LED lighting has become increasingly popular due to its efficiency and long lifespan. However, these bright lights tend to emit blue light, which can be harmful to birds, insects, and fish. The DNR recommends that any projects using LED luminaries follow the MnDOT Approved Products for luminaries, which limits the Uplight rating to 0. A nominal color temperature below 2700K is preferable for wildlife, and so we recommend choosing products that have the lowest number for backlight and glare (all approved products should already be 0 for Uplight). Thank you again for the opportunity to review this document. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Melissa Collins Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist | Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Phone: 651-259-5755 Email: melissa.collins@state.mn.us Page 113 of 454 3 CC: Steve Troskey, Lennar Corporation Equal Opportunity Employer Page 114 of 454 Physical Development Division P 952-891-7000 F 952-891-7031 W www.dakotacounty.us A Dakota County Western Service Center • 14955 Galaxie Ave. • Apple Valley • MN 55124 March 26, 2026 Tony Wippler City of Farmington 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Vermillion Reserve Project, a residential development in Eureka Township. Physical Development staff has reviewed this scoping document and have the following comments. Environmental Resources Section 7 Climate Adaptation and Resilience, Table 3 indicates that the project may consider incorporating water- efficient landscaping designs, water reuse systems, and the use of native plants and perennials. Water reuse and conservation efforts align with the Dakota County Groundwater Plan. In addition, consider encouraging the installation of low-input, drought-tolerant turf species—such as fescue grass—in place of traditional lawn blends. The Soil and Water Conservation District’s Lawns Reimagined program provides a valuable resource for guidance on these practices. Section 9 Permits and Approvals, Table 7 under Dakota County, "Well construction” permits should be added to the Type of Application column for any dewatering wells that will be necessary for the development. “Well abandonment” should be changed to “Well sealing”. Section 11 Geology, soils and topography/landforms contains the statement, “According to the Department of Natural Resources mapping “Pollution Sensitivity of Near-Surface Materials,” the Project Site has low sensitivity to pollution.” This is not accurate. The project site is mapped as highly sensitive to pollution with a small portion on the west side mapped as moderate. Page 115 of 454 Physical Development Division P 952-891-7000 F 952-891-7031 W www.dakotacounty.us A Dakota County Western Service Center • 14955 Galaxie Ave. • Apple Valley • MN 55124 Section 12.a.ii Groundwater Due to the vulnerability of the groundwater to contamination, efforts should be made to minimize the use of chemicals on the Study Area. Lawn care fertilizers and herbicides can impact the groundwater and drinking water aquifers. Providing thick, quality topsoil and a subsequent inspection to verify that it was provided in areas for lawn and landscaping is recommended. To reduce the need for chemicals and irrigation, plant native, drought tolerant landscape plants and tall fescue for lawn areas. Wells: There are 6 wells on this site that must be found and sealed by a licensed well contractor. Please make sure to take advantage of demolition dates and coordinate with Dakota County well inspectors to get these wells located as soon as possible to avoid costly excavations after redevelopment has already begun. A Dakota County Well Inspector reviewed any previous audits, historic plat maps, sanborns, historic aerial photography, well construction records, well sealing records and/or well disclosure statements that Dakota County has available for 4752 220th Street W., Farmington (taxpin 130010002012). Of the 7 wells on the property, only 1 has been sealed by Kimmes-Bauer Well Drilling (construction/sealing record attached). Unique Number Status Year drilled Description 608179 sealed 1997 4 inch drinking water well https://mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/mwi/index.xhtml?wellId=608179 410934 not sealed 1985 4 inch drinking water well https://mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/mwi/index.xhtml?wellId=410934 207519 in-use 1969 12 inch irrigation well https://mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/mwi/index.xhtml?wellId=207519 W05649 not sealed ? 1.25 inch drinking water well from 4758 220th Street there was a permit in 2011 to seal but it was cancelled/expired. (see attached) W05650 not sealed ? 1.25 inch drinking water well from 4752 220th Street W05651 not sealed ? 1.25 inch drinking water well from 4746 220th Street W05999 not sealed ? 6 inch agricultural well Page 116 of 454 Physical Development Division P 952-891-7000 F 952-891-7031 W www.dakotacounty.us A Dakota County Western Service Center • 14955 Galaxie Ave. • Apple Valley • MN 55124 Below is a picture from 2008 showing approximate locations of the wells. Locations can also be seen in the attached permit application from 1997. If redevelopment is planned, crews should be notified of the presence of several wells and any wells encountered should be protected from damage and contamination. If any additional wells not listed here are discovered during site visits and/or during redevelopment, they should be examined by a licensed well contractor or a Dakota County well inspector to determine the status. A magnetometer is the best, sometimes only way to locate wells that are below grade. Dakota County can help locate and mark wells using a magnetometer by calling 952-891-7537. Magnetometers work best on a clear site free from large metal obstructions. A Dakota County well inspector must be present during any well searches to rule out the presence of a well. Information about property transfer requirements as they pertain to wells is on our webpage at https://www.co.dakota.mn.us/HomeProperty/SellingProperty/WellRequirements. If a real estate sale is occurring, it is in the interest of both parties that a well disclosure be filed if appropriate and any well compliance issues be resolved. State Statute 103I Section 235 Subdivision 2 states, "Unless the buyer and seller agree to the contrary, in writing, before the closing of the sale, a seller who fails to disclose the existence or known status of a well at the time of sale and knew or had reason to know of the existence or known status of the well, is liable to the buyer for costs relating to sealing of the well and reasonable attorney fees for collection of costs Page 117 of 454 Physical Development Division P 952-891-7000 F 952-891-7031 W www.dakotacounty.us A Dakota County Western Service Center • 14955 Galaxie Ave. • Apple Valley • MN 55124 from the seller, if the action is commenced within six years after the date the buyer closed the purchase of the real property where the well is located." Transportation Roadway and Right-of-Way Requirements · 220th Street West (future County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 74): Planned as a 4-lane facility, requiring dedication of 75 feet of half right-of-way. · County Road (CR) 31 (Denmark Avenue): Planned as a 3-lane facility, requiring dedication of 60 feet of half right-of-way. § Currently designated as a 2-lane facility based on travel demand projections for agricultural traffic. § City of Farmington annexation and the projected residential development will increase traffic, prompting the County to revise the highway plat needs to a 3-lane facility. Access Management · Access points to existing and future County highways are generally consistent with current conditions and the County’s access spacing guidelines. · The northeastern-most access to 220th Street West may be limited to restricted access. · Final access determinations will be provided upon submission of a preliminary plat prior to site development. Local Street Network · The site should provide multiple internal east-west local street connections. Relying on a single connection increases local trip demand on the County highway system. Pedestrian and Trail Connectivity · Trails should be incorporated with the development along 220th Street West and CR 31 to support pedestrian access to nearby destinations, including Boeckman Middle School, located ¼ mile north. · The County and City are coordinating the reconstruction of CR 31 from CSAH 50 to 220th Street West, which will include trails on both sides with dedication pedestrian crossings. · Expanding the trail network is essential to support safe and convenient pedestrian movement. Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) Comments · The TIA previously used the NCHRP Intersection Channelization Guide to assess right-turn lane requirements. Instead, the MnDOT Right Turn Lane Analysis Checks should be applied. · Right turn lanes will be required for all public access points to the County highways, based on the scale of the proposed development. · The County’s standard turn lane dimensions are 300 feet of full-width storage with a 180-foot taper. · Left turn lane requirements will be evaluated with the development TIA review after corrections and with the permit process. · Thirteen-hour traffic counts are required for intersection control warrant analysis; the TIA currently includes only 4-hour data. Please coordinate with County Transportation staff to reevaluate the warrant analysis. · The TIA must incorporate the County’s ongoing CR 31 reconstruction planning. County staff will provide traffic study data from the preliminary engineering phase to support the TIA and accurately assess development impacts at corridor intersections, including CR 31 / CSAH 74. · The TIA indicates failing delay levels at the CR 31/CSAH 74 intersection based on Synchro forecast. County staff recommend using a microsimulation model to provide more realist delay estimates. For planning purposes, assume westbound left-run, though, and right-turn lanes on CSAH 74 will be required. Coordinated with County Transportation staff for further details. Page 118 of 454 Physical Development Division P 952-891-7000 F 952-891-7031 W www.dakotacounty.us A Dakota County Western Service Center • 14955 Galaxie Ave. • Apple Valley • MN 55124 If you have any questions relating to our comments, please contact me at 952-891-7007 or Georg.Fischer@co.dakota.mn.us Sincerely, Georg T Fischer Assistant County Manager Physical Development Division cc: Commissioner Mike Slavik, District 1 Heidi Welsch, County Manager Page 119 of 454 Page 120 of 454 Page 121 of 454 Page 122 of 454 Page 123 of 454 Pa g e 1 2 4 o f 4 5 4 Page 125 of 454 Page 126 of 454 Page 127 of 454 Page 128 of 454 Page 129 of 454 Page 130 of 454 Page 131 of 454 Page 132 of 454 Page 133 of 454 Kim Zlimen <kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com> FW: Farmington Vermillion Reserves - TIA comments ahead of EAW Scott Israelson <scott@traffic-impact.com>Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 6:06 PM To: Kim Zlimen <kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com> I received this from the County, additional comments to the ones that you forwarded to me on 4/7. Scott P. Israelson, P.E., PTOE † 612.875.2417 FL GA MN ND SC SD TX scott@traffic-impact.com From: Krage, Tyler <Tyler.Krage@CO.DAKOTA.MN.US> Sent: Monday, 13 April, 2026 15:25 To: Scott Israelson <scott@traffic-impact.com> Cc: Chapek, Jacob <Jacob.Chapek@CO.DAKOTA.MN.US>; Peters, Scott <Scott.Peters@CO.DAKOTA.MN.US>; John Powell, PE <jpowell@farmingtonmn.gov> Subject: Farmington Vermillion Reserves - TIA comments ahead of EAW Hi Scott, You will probably see these comments from the County as we left these comments in the EAW, but I know that developers are probably looking to expedite this as much as possible (we have some interest in that as well). We have some basic comments that we’d like to get addressed in the TIA for the Vermillion Reserve in Farmington. I looked over the TIA and have the following thoughts: -Agreed, access on 31 makes sense based off of undivided highways over 45 mph and under 1500 2040 ADT, assuming they’re meeting the existing access points on the other side of 31. On 74, I don’t hate the RIRO option knowing that they have an access just to the south servicing nearly the same area, but would still want to avoid a similar situation with the median RIRO at 64/Meadowview. Would that then mean that the SBL on the north side of 220th would have to do the U- turn? If 74 is a long way from becoming a principal, I don’t think it’s super necessary at this time to restrict that, especially with the north side already open. (maybe we had this discussion already at Plat, apologies if that’s been hashed out already). -The TIA used a NHCRP study to determine the right turn need, please the MnDOT Right turn lane analysis checks on these instead. 5/4/26, 12:49 PM Swanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC Mail - FW: Farmington Vermillion Reserves - TIA comments ahead of EAW https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=13c4d22894&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1863938653552351201&simpl=msg-f:1863938653552351201 1/2Page 134 of 454 -For documentation purposes, the TIA should have our County Spacing guidelines illustrated and denoted that the guidance is met. -The TIA should be collecting 13-hour data for the warrant check (they did 4 hours). We can provide this data to them, but the big point is that the warrants should be evaluating the 13-hour (and extrapolating from the AM/PM/Daily over the course of the day) to provide estimated warrant numbers. With the assumption that County utilizes the 8-hour warrant. -The TIA has failing delay numbers at 31/74, but the numbers should be using simtraffic (not just synchro) or other microsimulation to model this, as it creates a more realistic delay estimation. For the time being, the model can assume a combined WBT/WBL lane and a separate WBR lane. -Can you send us the synchro files for this as a record on our end? Especially if the scope does enable Simtraffic, as least we can check those numbers to see the realistic delays at 31/74. As your TIA noted, we are looking at what the 31 (Denmark) corridor will be looking like, and this information will be especially notable for the Denmark/74 intersection. Let me know if there are any questions or concerns, and we look forward to what your data/models show. Thanks! Tyler Tyler Krage, PE, PTOE County Traffic Engineer Department of Transportation P 952-891-7981 W www.dakotacounty.us A 14955 Galaxie Avenue, Apple Valley, MN 55124 Note: This email and its attachments may contain information protected by state or federal law or that may not otherwise be disclosed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email and its attachments from all devices. 5/4/26, 12:49 PM Swanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC Mail - FW: Farmington Vermillion Reserves - TIA comments ahead of EAW https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=13c4d22894&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1863938653552351201&simpl=msg-f:1863938653552351201 2/2Page 135 of 454 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Project: Vermillion Reserve Location: Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Prepared for: Prepared by: Page 136 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 2 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Table of Contents 1. Project Title ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Proposer ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 3. RGU................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Reason for EAW Preparation ............................................................................................................................................ 4 5. Project Location ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 6. Project Description ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience .................................................................................................................................... 9 8. Cover types ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 9. Permits and approvals required ....................................................................................................................................... 13 10. Land use ........................................................................................................................................................................ 15 11. Geology, soils and topography/landforms ..................................................................................................................... 21 12. Water resources ............................................................................................................................................................ 23 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes ................................................................................................................. 30 14. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) .................................................... 34 15. Historic properties .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 16. Visual ............................................................................................................................................................................. 40 17. Air .................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint ................................................................................................... 41 19. Noise ............................................................................................................................................................................. 44 20. Transportation ............................................................................................................................................................... 45 21. Cumulative potential effects........................................................................................................................................... 46 22. Other potential environmental effects ............................................................................................................................ 46 List of Tables Table 1. Anticipated Project Schedule Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Table 2. Project Magnitude .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Table 3. Project Resource Category and Climate Trend Interaction ..................................................................................... 9 Table 4. Cover Types, Before and After .............................................................................................................................. 12 Table 5. Green Infrastructure, Before and After .................................................................................................................. 12 Table 6. Tree Canopy, Before and After .............................................................................................................................. 12 Table 7. Permits and Approvals........................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 8. Concept Plan Land Use Summary ........................................................................................................................ 17 Table 9. Planned Land Use Designations ........................................................................................................................... 17 Table 10. Existing Zoning .................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 11. NRCS Soil Classifications .................................................................................................................................... 22 Page 137 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 3 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Table 12. Public Waters within 1 Mile of Project Site........................................................................................................... 23 Table 13. Delineated Wetlands on Project Site ................................................................................................................... 24 Table 14. Documented Wells on Project Site ...................................................................................................................... 25 Table 15. Estimated Sanitary Sewer Flow Rates ................................................................................................................ 26 Table 16. Estimated Water Supply ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Table 17. Potentially Contaminated Sites within One Mile of Project Site ........................................................................... 31 Table 18. Potentially Contaminated Agricultural Sites within One Mile of Project Site ........................................................ 33 Table 19. Estimated Waste ................................................................................................................................................. 34 Table 20. Federally Listed Species in/near Project Site and Effects Determination ............................................................ 37 Table 21. Historic Properties within 1/2 mile of Project Site ................................................................................................ 40 Table 22. Construction Emissions ....................................................................................................................................... 42 Table 23. Operational Emissions ......................................................................................................................................... 42 Table 24. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) Default Noise Emission Reference Levels ................................... 44 Table 25. Statutory Noise Limit Standards .......................................................................................................................... 44 Table 26: Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................................................................... 45 Appendices Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: Agency Reviews Appendix C: Geotechnical Boring Logs Appendix D: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix E: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Appendix F: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Calculator Analysis Appendix G: Traffic Study Note: Appendices include executive summaries of some reports only. Full reports including attachments available upon request. Page 138 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 4 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET This most recent Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and guidance documents are available at the Environmental Quality Board’s website at: https://www.eqb.state.mn.us/ The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. Guidance documents provide additional detail and links to resources for completing the EAW form. 1. Project Title Vermillion Reserve 2. Proposer Contact Person: Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Phone: Email: Steve Troskey Land Entitlement Manager, Lennar Corporation 16355 36th Avenue N #100 Plymouth, MN 55446 (612) 590-0531 Steve.Troskey@lennar.com 3. RGU Contact Person: Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Phone: Email: Tony Wippler Planning Manager 430 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 280-6822 TWippler@FarmingtonMN.gov 4. Reason for EAW Preparation Required: EIS Scoping Mandatory EAW Discretionary: Citizen Petition RGU discretion Proposer Initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): EAW, Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 19(D). Residential development. Page 139 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 5 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 5. Project Location County: City/Township: PLS Location: Watershed (81 major watershed scale): GPS Coordinates: Tax Parcel Number: Dakota County City of Farmington) Township 113N, Range 20W, NE ¼ of Section 1 Mississippi River – Lake Pepin Latitude 44.627113, Longitude -93.162227 130010002012 See Appendix A – Figure 1 Project Location and Figure 2 USGS Quad Map 6. Project Description a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). The proposed Project, Vermillion Reserve, is a residential development in Farmington, Minnesota, On February 2, 2026, the City of Farmington adopted Ordinance 2026-001 permitting the annexation of the Project Site from Eureka Township by ordinance. Certified copies of the ordinance were filed with the Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit of the Office of Administrative Hearings, the Minnesota Secretary of State, the Dakota County Auditor, and Eureka Township. The Administrative Law Judge reviewed the annexation petition and ordinance and issued an order approving the annexation on February 25, 2026.. The Vermillion Reserve will be built on approximately 158.3 acres and will be developed with up to 370 single-family detached units, stormwater management areas, curvilinear roads, and open spaces. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce waste, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. Lennar Corporation (“Proposer”) is proposing to develop a residential neighborhood that will include up to 370 single-family detached units, outdoor community gathering spaces, and stormwater management areas (“Project”). The Project will be developed on approximately 158.3 acres of land (“Project Site”) that has historically been used for agricultural production, agricultural structures, and a homestead. The Project Site is located west of County Road 31 (Denmark Avenue) and south of 220th Street W in the City of Farmington. An annexation by ordinance to annex the Project Site from Eureka Township was issued on February 25, 2026. The Project Site is generally flat and gently sloping toward the Vermillion River which runs north across 220th Street W near the northwest corner of the site. Four gas pipeline utility easements run diagonally north-south through the center of the Project Site with development proposed outside of the gas pipeline easement area. The gas pipeline easement area comprises approximately 28.7 acres of the site that may not be developed as part of the Project and uses will be restricted in compliance with the terms of the easement. An east- west local roadway is proposed to cross the gas pipeline easements, which will provide connections across the Project Site and provide the necessary access for the new neighborhoods. An agreement to cross the gas pipeline easement with the access road will be required as part of the land use and development permit process. The Project is proposed to be developed in phases starting in 2026, once the annexation process is complete and all required land use approvals and permits are obtained. The first phase of development includes the north portion of the Project Site as shown in Appendix A – Figure 3 Page 140 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 6 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Concept Plan. The first development phase is proposed to include up to 37 dwelling units on the west side of the utility easement with a single access point at 220th Street W, and approximately 42 dwelling units on the east side of the utility easement with access points at 220th Street W and Denmark Avenue. The southern portion of the site is proposed to be developed to respond to market demand, to begin no earlier than 2027. An additional 130 dwelling units with cul-de-sacs, a roadway crossing the utility easements, and access points at 225th Street W will be constructed in the southwest portion of the Project Site, and an additional 161 housing units with cul-de-sacs, and access points to 225th Street W and Denmark Avenue will be constructed in the southeast. Existing Property The 158.3-acre Project Site includes existing Dakota County parcel 130010002012. The parcel is currently developed with a rural residential home (farmstead) and structures associated with the agricultural use, including sheds, barns, and silos. The Project Site is currently bordered to the north by medium- and high-density residential development, to the east by public/semi-public land (the Church of St. Michael and The Legacy of Farmington senior living community) and single-family residential, and to the south and west by agricultural land. General Development Plan Appendix A – Figure 3 Concept Plan shows the extent of the Project, including both proposed development phases. The Project includes 370 detached single-family residential units on the following lot sizes: Residential Development Summary The Project includes 370 detached single-family residential units on the following lot sizes: • 40-foot-wide – 116 lots • 50-foot-wide – 87 lots • 55-foot-wide – 121 lots • 65-foot-wide lots – 46 lots Infrastructure and Public/Semi-Public Uses The following areas are planned to support the proposed residential development. Areas are approximate and are subject to minor changes during the platting process. • Wetlands – 3.1 acres • Gas Pipeline Easement – 28.7 acres • Public Park – 4 acres • Open Space including ponds, infiltration and filtration basins – 31 acres • Local roadways – 20 acres Infrastructure and Project Area Improvements The Project includes the following improvements: Demolition, Grading, and Utilities The existing farmstead structures will be removed as part of the initial phase of the site development process. Mass rough grading and grading of stormwater management facilities will occur in phases concurrent to construction of adjacent infrastructure, beginning with the northern portion of the development, followed by the southern portion once the north area is built out. Gravity sanitary sewer is proposed to be extended to the Project Site and will be constructed concurrent to each phase of development. A City of Farmington project is proposed to extend Page 141 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 7 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 10-inch sanitary sewer and 12-inch watermain with stubs along the north boundary of the Project Site. The Project Site will connect to the sanitary sewer and watermain stubs. It is anticipated that the Project Site will have two watermain connections at 220th Street, and one connection to a 12- inch watermain east of Denmark Avenue. Road Improvements Primary access points to the development will be from 220th Street W (two access points), County Road 31 (two access points), and 225th Street W (two access points). The connections to County Road 31 will require approval of Dakota County and will be subject to County access spacing guidelines. To the west, local roadways will terminate in cul-de-sacs until such time the parcel to the west develops. The first phase of development will include the construction of roadways with connections to 220th Street on both west and east sides of the gas pipeline easements. In the developed area on the east side of the gas pipeline easements, an access point at County Road 31 will also be constructed during the first phase. Subsequent phases of the development will construct a roadway over the gas pipeline easements to connect the east and west development areas and to provide secondary development access to the west area. Two street connections to 225th Street are proposed to be made as part of the south development phase. 220th Street W and 225th Street W are currently gravel roadways. The City of Farmington planned to pave 220th Street W to a rural section in 2026. To serve the Project Site, the planned roadway section of 220th Street W will be changed to an urban section with curb and gutter, and the Proposer will likely be responsible for the development’s fair share of associated costs. In addition, prior to development traffic being routed to 225th Street W, the roadway is planned to be paved from County Road 31 to the west plat limit. Future roadway improvements and timing should be coordinated with outcomes from Dakota County’s County Road 31 & County Road 74 Study (see Item 20. Transportation for more information). Stormwater Management The stormwater management system will include the construction of curb and gutter, catch basins, and storm sewer pipes throughout the Project Site that will connect to stormwater ponds and the infiltration areas. The stormwater ponds will be designed to meet all City and Watershed requirements for rate and quality control. During site construction, erosion and sediment controls (such as silt fence, inlet protection, etc.) will be installed and maintained per the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit requirements. An anticipated project schedule is provided in Table 1. See Appendix A – Figure 4 for a Project Phasing map. Table 1. Anticipated Project Schedule Summary PHASE ANTICIPATED DATE ACTIVITY Phase I Spring 2026 Site grading of entire Project Site. Public and private utilities installed concurrently with road construction. Buildout of single-family residential units with direct access to 220th Street. Improvements to 220th Street, if needed. Phase II 2027 – 2028 Construction of additional units south of Phase I. Public and private utilities installed concurrently with road construction. Potential construction of temporary west-east road over utility easement for emergency access. Phase III 2029 - 2030 Construction of additional units south of Phase II. Public and private utilities installed concurrently with road construction. Construction of permanent west-east roadway over utility easement. Page 142 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 8 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 PHASE ANTICIPATED DATE ACTIVITY Phase IV 2031 - 2033 Public and private utilities to be installed concurrently with road construction. Buildout of single-family residential units on south side with direct access to 225th Street. Improvements to 225th Street. c. Project magnitude: The project magnitude is summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Project Magnitude DESCRIPTION SIZE (APPROXIMATE) Total Project Acreage 158.3 Linear project length N/A Number and type of residential units 370 single-family detached units Residential building area (in square feet) N/A Commercial building area (in square feet) N/A Industrial building area (in square feet) N/A Institutional building area (in square feet) N/A Other uses – specify (in square feet) • Gas Pipeline Easements Area 28.7 acres Structure height(s) Maximum 35’ d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose of the Project is to develop a new residential neighborhood with single-family detached homes in south Farmington. The development will support Farmington’s projected population growth and the increasing demand for additional housing. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? Yes No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? Yes No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. Page 143 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 9 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience a. Describe the climate trends in the general location of the project (see guidance: Climate Adaptation and Resilience) and how climate change is anticipated to affect that location during the life of the project. Present and anticipated future shifts in Minnesota’s climate include greater intensity rainfall events, increased instances of localized flooding, more frequent freeze/thaw cycles, diminished snow cover, extreme heat, drought, and associated infrastructure damage and safety hazards. The following assesses climate trends as they pertain to the Project Site. Temperature Trends The Project Site is situated in the Mississippi River – Lake Pepin major watershed. Per the Minnesota Climate Explorer tool 1, the average annual temperature (1895-2024) has trended upward by approximately 0.18°F/decade within the Major Watershed District (Appendix A – Figure 5). The average annual temperature in 2024 was 49.19°F in the Major Watershed which is higher than the average of 44.39°F since 1895. Climate models generally predict an increase in average temperature, with average annual temperature ranges from 45.4°F to 52.58°F during mid-century (2040-2059) (Appendix A – Figure 6). The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources State Climatology Office also anticipates warming winters, a continued increase in the frequency and magnitude of extreme rainfall events, and an increase in the severity, coverage, and duration of heat waves through the end of this century. Precipitation Trends Per the Minnesota Climate Explorer tool, the average annual precipitation for the Mississippi River – Lake Pepin major watershed has trended upward by approximately 0.42 inches/decade (1895-2024). The annual rainfall in 2024 was 35.33 inches, which is higher than the average since 1895 (Appendix A – Figure 7). Climate models generally predict an increase in average annual precipitation with ranges from 16.3 inches to 67.2 inches during mid-century (2040-2059) (Appendix A – Figure 8). The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources State Climatology Office also anticipates warming winters, a continued increase in the frequency and magnitude of extreme rainfall events, and an increase in the severity, coverage and duration of heat waves through the end of this century. b. For each Resource Category in the table below: Describe how the project’s proposed activities and how the project’s design will interact with those climate trends. Describe proposed adaptations to address the project effects identified. Table 3. Project Resource Category and Climate Trend Interaction RESOURCE CATEGORY CLIMATE CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT INFORMATION CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES ADAPTATIONS Project Design • Increase in impervious surface coverage. • Building architecture, materials choices and site design may negatively affect urban heat island conditions in the area . • In the future, the Project Site is anticipated to experience increased annual temperatures, annual precipitation and freeze/thaw cycles, more frequent and heavier rainfall events, and • Landscaping will be selected and planted per City requirements. Proposed native trees and landscaping will reduce runoff and mitigate heat island effect. 1 “Minnesota Climate Explorer,” MN DNR, accessed 11/17/2025, https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/climateexplorer/main/historical Page 144 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 10 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 RESOURCE CATEGORY CLIMATE CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT INFORMATION CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES ADAPTATIONS • Buildings will alter solar availability reducing opportunities to leverage solar resources. increased heat island effects. • Dark roofing and siding materials absorb heat during daylight hours and emit heat at night contributing to heat island effects and potentially contributes to warming trends. • Consider building exterior materials and colors that are lighter and reflect heat. • Energy efficient appliances and lighting will be incorporated into building design. • Building/lot orientations should consider south- facing roof opportunities to maximize solar options. • Vegetative plans should consider placement to minimize rooftop shading where lot orientations support solar options. • Water efficient design will be incorporated into landscaping plans. • With increased impervious area and increased chances of freeze/thaw cycles, adaptations related to chloride use should be considered. • Consider the installation of low-input, drought-tolerant turf species, such as fescue grass, in place of traditional lawn blends. Land Use • Conversion of cropland to suburban development will increase impervious surface coverage and may contribute to increased occurrences of local flooding. • Lack of deep-rooted vegetation and tree cover could contribute to erosion and washouts in high rainfall events. • Increased impervious surface will contribute to heat island effects as temperatures rise. • Design standards for building materials and landscaping should be considered to incorporate light/reflective colors and native vegetation around ponding, open space and natural areas. Water Resources • Current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence water resources. • Surface and groundwater resources may increase in temperature, pollutant content, and volume due to increased temperatures and runoff. • Stormwater BMPs will be designed to meet City of Farmington criteria for rate and volume control, and criteria for MPCA water quality requirements. Page 145 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 11 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 RESOURCE CATEGORY CLIMATE CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT INFORMATION CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS AND VULNERABILITIES ADAPTATIONS • More severe storm events are projected which will require drainage systems to be adequately designed and maintained to accommodate the increase in water volume and flow rates. • Recommended use of native plants and perennials for landscaping within water resources buffers and within landscape areas • Consider water reuse systems to reduce water usage, especially for landscaping areas. • Proposer must meet the requirements of the Shoreland Management Regulations of City Code 10-6-18. • Due to the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination, efforts should be made to minimize the use of chemicals in the Project area. Contamination/ Hazardous Materials/Wastes • Current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the potential environmental effects of generation/use/ storage of hazardous waste and materials. • The proposed development is not anticipated to generate hazardous waste or materials. Not applicable. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) • Current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the local species and suitable habitat. • Suitable habitat for species may become unsuitable due to land use changes, increased temperatures, and increased runoff. • Climate-appropriate native plantings and stormwater BMPs will provide suitable habitat for small mammals, insects, and bird species. • It is recommended to seed the pipeline easement as a pollinator corridor to provide suitable habitat for pollinator species. Page 146 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 12 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 8. Cover types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Existing cover types as determined by the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) are shown in Table 4 and Appendix A – Figure 9. Post development cover types are estimated based on the concept plan (Appendix A – Figure 3). Table 4. Cover Types, Before and After COVER TYPES BEFORE (acres)1 AFTER (acres)2 <30% Impervious - 71.3 <50% Impervious 11.2 19.6 Agricultural land 143.8 - Wetland/Wetland Emergent Vegetation 3.1 3.1 Green/Open Space - 39.5 Stormwater ponding 19.1 Green Infrastructure (from Table 5) - 5.5 TOTAL 158.1 158.1 1 Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System, https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/biota- landcover-mlccs. See Figure 8 for map of existing cover types. 2 Approximated based on Figure 3 Concept Plan. Table 5. Green Infrastructure, Before and After GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE BEFORE (acres) AFTER (acres) Constructed infiltration systems (infiltration basins/infiltration trenches) 0 5.5 Section 10-6-11 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance contains woodland and tree preservation regulations. A woodland preservation plan must be submitted, approved by the City, and implemented in accordance with the plan for any new development. The plan must include a tree inventory, indicating size, species, general health, and location of all existing significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands. Up to thirty percent (30%) of the diameter inches of significant trees on any parcel may be removed without replacement requirements. Replacement according to the tree replacement schedule is required when removal exceeds more than thirty percent of the total significant tree diameter inches. Table 6. Tree Canopy, Before and After TREES TREE CANOPY % / NUMBER OF TREES Percent tree canopy removed or number of mature trees removed during development1 Approximately 50% Number of new trees planted2 302 trees 1 Current tree canopy is less than 1% of Project Site area. 2 Per City of Farmington City Code Section Title 11, Chapter 5, §11-5-3 2, approximate minimum 2” caliper boulevard trees based on tree spacing of 40 feet on center along boulevards. Actual number of trees to be planted to be determined during development process. 2 “Code of Ordinances,” City of Farmington, MN, 5/20/2024, https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/farmingtonmn/latest/farmington_mn/0-0-0-8323 Page 147 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 13 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 9. Permits and approvals required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Table 7. Permits and Approvals UNIT OF GOVERNMENT TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS Federal US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Clean Waters Act – Wetland Permit Not Anticipated (To be applied for, if required) MPCA 401 Certification, if required State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Construction Permit To be applied for Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) To be applied for Sanitary sewer extension permit To be applied for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) MN Natural Heritage Database Review Complete Dewatering permit To be applied for, if needed Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Water main plan review and water supply connection To be applied for Metropolitan Council Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Approval To be applied for Local City of Farmington Annexation/Annexation Ordinance In Progress, Anticipated Completion Q1 2026 Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) To be applied for Rezoning To be applied for Preliminary and Final Plat To be applied for Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Permit To be applied for Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Permits To be applied for Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) Watershed and Land Disturbance Plan Review To be applied for Dakota County Well Sealing To be applied for Page 148 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 14 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 UNIT OF GOVERNMENT TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS Well Construction for Dewatering To be applied for, if needed Access Permit To be applied for OTHER – Pipelines Northern Natural Gas Pipeline Encroachment Permit In progress Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 10-20, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No.22. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 21. Page 149 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 15 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 10. Land use a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks and open space, cemeteries, trails, prime or unique farmlands. The Project Site has predominantly been used for agricultural production and includes a rural residence, several outbuildings, and cultivated land. The Project Site is currently bordered to the north by residential development (City of Farmington), to the east by public/semi-public land uses (City of Farmington), and to the west and south by agricultural land (Eureka Township). Existing land use maps are shown in Appendix A – Figure 10 (City of Farmington) and Appendix A – Figure 11 (Eureka Township). The Project site is bisected by four (4) gas pipeline easements that run generally northeast to southwest through the parcel. The gas pipeline easements are aligned with an underground pipeline and cultivation has historically occurred within the easement areas. Limited uses within the pipeline easements are permitted, which generally restricts uses to croplands and limits or prohibits certain types of vegetation and croplands. The Project Site’s existing land use was Agricultural and Farmstead per Eureka Township’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan.3 The Project Site is not within the City’s Anticipated Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Staging Plan which includes orderly annexation areas in existing townships. One-half mile to the east of the Project Site is the Dakota County Fairgrounds, one mile to the north is Rambling River Park, and one mile to the east is Prairie View Park. The recently constructed residential development north of 220th Street W includes sidewalks on one side of Denton Ave. The Project Site is not within or adjacent to any Wildlife Management Areas (WMA), Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA), or National Wildlife Refuges (NWR).4 Approximately 155.7 acres or over 98% of the Project Site is prime farmland or prime farmland if drained. Prime Farmland, as defined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and is available for these uses. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. The Project Site is in the City of Farmington, annexed from Eureka Township. Ordinance 2026-001 was approved by the City Council on February 2, 2026, permitting the annexation of the Project Site by ordinance. The petition and ordinance were reviewed by the State of Minnesota, and an order approving the annexation was issued on February 25, 2026. The City of Farmington is in the west-central portion of Dakota County, approximately 25 miles south of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The City is in the seven-county metropolitan area which is under the regional planning jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council. Due to its proximity to the Twin Cities urban core, new development in this area is anticipated and planned for by the communities. 3 “Eureka Township 2040 Comprehensive Plan,” Eureka Township, MN, 5/17/2018, https://eurekamn.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Adopted- 2040CompPlan-5.17.18-2.pdf 4 “Minnesota Natural Resource Atlas,” Natural Resources Research Institute, accessed 11/25/2025, https://mnatlas.org/gis-tool/?id=k_0047 Page 150 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 16 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Metropolitan Council The City of Farmington is designated as a “Emerging Suburban Edge” community designation in the Metropolitan Council’s Thrive MSP 2040 5 regional development guide. Emerging Suburban Edge communities are expected to plan for forecasted population and household growth at an average density of at least 3 to 5 dwelling units per acre. Thrive MSP 2040 is the current regional policy until such time local comprehensive plans are updated and adopted in accordance with the 2050 regional plan as described below. The Metropolitan Council adopted its Imagine 2050 6 regional long-range plan on February 12, 2025, which sets the regional policy for the next comprehensive planning period which is defined as 2030-2050. In late September 2025, the Metropolitan Council distributed system statements to each city in the seven-county metropolitan region that cities will use along with the Imagine 2050 framework to update local comprehensive plans by December 31, 2028. The Imagine 2050 Land Use Policy Plan reassigned Emerging Suburban Edge communities to the Suburban Edge community designation. The minimum net density for Suburban Edge communities will be 3.5 units per acre. Annexation of Project Site The Project parcel was until recently in Eureka Township and was guided Agriculture in the Township’s adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan. An ordinance permitting the annexation of the Project parcel was approved by the City Council on February 2, 2026. An order for annexation was issued on February 25, 2026. Upon annexation the Project parcel was brought under the jurisdiction of the City of Farmington and will be required to be re- guided to a recognized land use designation within the City’s plan. City of Farmington Comprehensive Plan Upon annexation, the Project parcel must be incorporated into the City’s Comprehensive Plan and appropriate amendments made to be consistent with the proposed Project. As part of the approval process, the Project parcel will be guided Residential. Land Use Land use designations for the City of Farmington are described in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan 7, Chapter 3, and the future land use map is shown in Appendix A – Figure 12. After finalization of the annexation, a CPA will be completed by the Project Proposer to change the future land use of the Project Site to an urbanized land use designation. It is anticipated that the Project site will be re-guided from Agricultural to Low/Medium Density Residential which requires density ranges of 3.5 to 6.0 dwelling units/acre. Table 8 provides a tabulation of the Project, and Table 9 describes the anticipated future land use of the Project Site and adjacent parcels. As demonstrated in Table 9, upon re-guiding the Project Site will be compatible with surrounding land uses within the City and will provide a transition from agricultural uses in the Township. 5 “Thrive MSP 2040,” Metropolitan Council, MN, 5/28/2014, https://metrocouncil.org/Planning/Imagine-2050/Thrive-2040.aspx 6 “Imagine 2050,” Metropolitan Council, MN, 2/12/2025, https://imagine2050.metrocouncil.org/ 7 “2040 Comprehensive Plan,” Farmington, MN, December 2019, https://www.farmingtonmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/307/2040-Comprehensive- Plan-PDF?bidId= Page 151 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 17 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Table 8. Concept Plan Land Use Summary FUTURE LAND USE REQUIRED DENSITY (DU/ac) USES # OF DWELLING UNITS NET AREA (acres) DENSITY (DU/ac) Low/Medium Density Residential 3.5 to 6.0 40-ft lots 116 96.5 3.83 50-ft lots 87 55-ft lots 121 65-ft lots 46 Wetlands - - - 3.1 - Gas Line Easement - - - 28.7 - Arterial R/W (future) - - - 3.7 - Public Parks1 - - - 4.0 - Stormwater Ponds1 - - 22.3 - TOTAL - - 370 158.3 - 1 Parks and stormwater pond areas dedicated to the city are estimated and will be finalized during the platting process. Table 9. Planned Land Use Designations LOCATION (Jurisdiction) LAND USE DESIGNATION Project Site Low/Medium Density Residential North (City) Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, Park/Open Space South (Township) Agricultural (one dwelling unit per quarter-quarter section; approx. 40 acres) East (City) Public/Semi-Public, Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential West (Township) Agricultural (one dwelling unit per quarter-quarter section; approx. 40 acres) Source: City of Farmington 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Eureka Township 2040 Comprehensive Plan The Project Site was not included within the City’s anticipated 2040 MUSA staging area or identified orderly annexation areas. Expansion of the MUSA will be required to serve the proposed Project, and appropriate amendments to the City’s MUSA and Development Staging maps must be completed as part of the CPA process (see Appendix A – Figure 13). As shown on the Concept Plan, there is a mix of 40-foot, 50-foot, and 60-foot single-family residential lots planned. The product/lot types are clustered into neighborhoods and organized with a curvilinear road network. As previously noted, there are four (4) gas pipeline easements that bisect the property that cannot be developed and may only be used for purposes that are consistent with the easement terms and conditions. As such, the pipeline easement areas will be removed from the Project’s density calculations at time of platting. Final density range and calculations will be completed as part of the land use and development process and must demonstrate compliance with the guided land use. Transportation The City’s transportation plan indicates that 220th Street W on the west side of County Road (CR) 31 will be a future A Minor Arterial-Expander which is consistent with Dakota County’s transportation plan. The long-term plan is for 220th Street W to be transferred to the Dakota County highway system. See below for information on the Dakota County Transportation Plan and the ongoing County Road 31 & County Road 74 Study. Page 152 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 18 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Parks & Recreation The City’s parks and recreation plan is consistent with Dakota County’s plan, including mention of the envisioned Chub Creek Greenway. As shown on the Concept Plan, a tot lot and dedicated parks and open space will be incorporated into the plan. Sidewalks and trails will connect the neighborhoods to the surrounding area which is consistent with the City’s adopted plan. Local Surface Water Management Plan The City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) guides the City in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources. The City maintains full authority for watershed management permitting of land alteration activities within the City. The City also maintains a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit from the MPCA for managing non-point source storm water. The Project Site will be within the Vermillion River Drainage District of the municipal storm sewer system. The Project must be designed to be consistent with the City’s surface water management rules and will obtain all proper permitting as part of the land use and development permit process. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan The City of Farmington is connected to the MCES trunk sanitary sewer system. As shown in the City’s Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, the Project Site will become part of Sanitary District 4 once connected to sanitary sewer. The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan shows a proposed trunk line on 220th Street W. In anticipation of development, the pipe will be sized to serve development of the Project Site. Water Supply and Distribution Plan The City’s Future Water System Map (see Figure 5.6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Water System Section) shows a proposed 12-inch watermain on 220th Street W and 12-inch lines to the north. Dakota County Comprehensive Plan Dakota County 2040 Comprehensive Plan (“DC2040”),8 is the County’s 10-year update of its comprehensive plan to guide County transportation systems, parks and open space, natural resources, and land planning. Chapter 3 addresses county transportation facilities and needs. CR 31, bordering the Project Site on the east, is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County. 220th Street W on the east side of CR 31 is County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 74. DC2040 shows 220th Street W west of CR 31 as a future 4-lane county highway and planned A Minor Expander (see Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2 of DC2040). The future recommended classification of this roadway west of CR 31 is a Principal Arterial, to connect to County Road 70 in Lakeville in the future (see Figure 3.3 of DC2040). Further analysis regarding the Project impact and recommended mitigation is provided in Item 20. Transportation. Chapter 4 addresses the County park system. The Chub Creek Greenway Regional Trail Search Corridor (RTSC) is proposed generally following the Vermillion River, directly northwest of the Project Site. RTSCs are proposed regional trails without Metropolitan Council-approved long-range plans that identify the trail alignments and are therefore not eligible for Regional Parks and Trails System funding. The Chub Creek Greenway is envisioned to eventually be a 20-mile corridor from the Vermillion River in Farmington, through Eureka and Greenvale townships, connecting to the Mill Towns State Trail near 8 “Dakota County Comprehensive Plan, DC2040,” Dakota County, Minnesota, 7//20/2021, https://www.co.dakota.mn.us/Government/Planning/CompPlan/Documents/2040ComprehensivePlanAmendment.pdf Page 153 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 19 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Waterford and Sciota townships. As the proposed trail alignment is adjacent but outside of the Project Site, provisions for the trail are not planned as part of Project development. Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan The Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) is responsible for developing and implementing the Vermillion River Watershed Management Plan which includes Watershed Standards. The City’s adopted local water management plan and ordinances are consistent with the VRWJPO Watershed Plan. The City of Farmington is the LGU within the watershed and operates their own permitting program for surface water management in compliance with the requirements of VRWJPO and other agencies that may have jurisdiction (i.e., MN DNR, USACE, Board of Water and Soil Resources). The Project will be required to demonstrate compliance with all applicable rules and standards as part of the land use and development permit process. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. Table 10 describes the existing zoning of the Project Site and adjacent properties. Table 10. Existing Zoning AREA (Jurisdiction) ZONING Project Site (Township) AG – Agriculture District North (City) R-3 Medium Density Residential, R-5 High Density Residential, Park/Open Space South (Township) AG – Agriculture District East (City) R-1 Low Density Residential, R-3 Medium Density Residential, R-5 High Density Residential West (Township) AG – Agriculture District Sources: City of Farmington, 2040 Comprehensive Plan; Eureka Township, 2040 Comprehensive Plan After annexation, the City of Farmington will be responsible for administering zoning. Section 10-4-3 of the City Code states that land added to the City by annexation shall be classified A-1 (Agriculture) until such time that the property is rezoned to a more appropriate classification. Following annexation, the property is anticipated to be rezoned to Low/Medium Density Residential with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay to permit the development of a mix of residential lot sizes. The PUD overlay provides a development alternative that allows for greater flexibility and creativity in site and building design than would be possible under the strict application of a zoning district’s requirements. The PUD overlay district adopts the underlying zoning district uses. Per Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 27037C0218E, there are no special flood hazard areas or other areas of flood hazard within the Project Site.9 However, a special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the 1% annual chance flood (100-year flood) is within 50 feet of the site’s northwest corner. The Project Site is within the shoreland district of the Vermillion River which flows through the tip of the northwest corner of the Project Site. The Project will be subject to the Shoreland Management Regulations set forth in City Code 10-6-18. There are no wild and scenic rivers or other critical areas in or near the Project Site.10 9 “FIRM Panel 27037C0218E,” FEMA, 12/2/2011, https://msc.fema.gov/portal/downloadProduct?productTypeID=FINAL_PRODUCT&productSubTypeID=FIRM_PANEL&productID=27037C0218E 10 “River Classifications,” MN DNR, accessed 11/21/2025, https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/wild_scenic/wsrivers/classification.html Page 154 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 20 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 The Project Site is not enrolled in the Agricultural Preserves program.11 iv. If any critical facilities (i.e. facilities necessary for public health and safety, those storing hazardous materials, or those with housing occupants who may be insufficiently mobile) are proposed in floodplain areas and other areas identified as at risk for localized flooding, describe the risk potential considering changing precipitation and event intensity. The northeastern portion of the Project Site is near but outside the special flood hazard area of the Vermillion River. No critical facilities are proposed in floodplain areas or other areas identified as at risk for localized flooding. b. Discuss the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The proposed Project Site is in a transition area between the Township, which has predominantly rural residential and agricultural land uses, and the City with urbanized development. The Project is anticipated to be developed under the Low/Medium Residential land use designation that will be comprised of single-family detached residential uses that provide a reasonable transition between the rural development patterns and the more urban suburban patterns within the City. As shown on Appendix A – Figure 3 Concept Plan, an extensive network of open space, ponds, infiltration and filtration areas will provide additional mitigation for the proposed development. The Project development will occur outside of the gas pipeline easement areas and will protect existing wetlands. Wetland buffers must be established adjacent to wetlands as required by City ordinances. If there are any impacts to wetlands, the Project must comply with mitigation and replacement requirements. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 10b above and any risk potential. A CPA is required due to the annexation of the parcel and the proposed Project. The CPA must be approved by the Metropolitan Council at which time the City will rezone the property for consistency with the Project. Details regarding the site design, stormwater management facilities, road network, parks and open space will be evaluated as part of the land use and development process. 11 “Agricultural Preserves 2024,” Metropolitan Council, 12/31/2024, https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metc-agri-agricultural-preserves2024 Page 155 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 21 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 11. Geology, soils and topography/landforms a. Geology Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. Plate 6, Bedrock Topography of the C-57 Geologic Atlas of Dakota County 12 notes that the depth to bedrock ranges between around 100 feet below the ground surface in the south portion of the Project Site to 200 feet below ground surface in the north. Per Plate 2, Bedrock Geology, the Project Site is underlain by Prairie du Chien Group, Shakopee Formation. This bedrock is composed of dolostone, sandy dolostone, sandstone, and shale. Thickness is around 80 feet under the Project Site. Per Plate 3, Surficial Geology, the Project Site is primarily underlain by undifferentiated New Ulm Formation sediment of sand and gravel. The sand ranges from coarse- to fine-grained and is poorly to well-sorted. The unit is generally 50 to 200 feet thick. Near the Vermillion River valley, surficial geology is sand and gravel, and fine-grained loam. This unit is generally stratified, coarse-grained sand and gravel deposited in fluvial channels, and finer-grained loam, silt, and sand on floodplains. According to the Department of Natural Resources mapping “Pollution Sensitivity of Near- Surface Materials,” the Project Site has high sensitivity to pollution.13 Pollution sensitivity is estimated from the transmission time of water through 3 feet of soil and 7 feet of surficial geology to a depth of 10 feet from the land surface. There are no known karst features in the vicinity of the Project Site.14 There are no identified limitations of the geologic features for the Project, nor any identified effects the Project may have on existing geologic features. b. Soils and topography Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes or highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 12.b.ii. Existing Topography Based on information available from the USGS online National Map Viewer and information on the Scott County GIS website, the ground surface elevations across the Project Site range from about 910 to 920 feet above mean sea level (msl). The Project Site is relatively flat with gentle slopes toward the Vermillion River to the northwest. 12 “C-57 Geologic Atlas of Dakota County,” University of Minnesota, 2023, https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/5d8d0fa7-2cc7-4db5-ba02- e33702bf3573 13 “Pollution Sensitivity – Near-Surface Materials,” MNDNR, 12/10/2022, https://mnatlas.org/resources/pollution-sensitivity-near-surface-materials/ 14 “Karst Features Map,” DNR, accessed 12/10/2025, https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/portal/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=e9d79d4c2c934035802fee2ba267ab42 Page 156 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 22 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Existing Soils on Project Site Table 11 identifies soils found at the Project Site, as determined by the NRCS web soil survey and Appendix A – Figure 14 depicts NRCS soil classification mapping. Most of the site’s soils are classified into hydrologic soil group B which is known to have moderately high infiltration rates. Most site soils also have moderate susceptibility to erosion. Waukegan silt loam is prone to compaction, and while it holds moisture well, its poor aeration can lead to insufficient oxygen for roots. Wadena loam is also prone to compaction, rapid drainage, and moderately high erosion potential where slopes are not covered. Table 11. NRCS Soil Classifications SOIL CLASSIFICATION NAME AREA (acres) % OF TOTAL PROJECT AREA SO I I L E R O S I O N FA C T T O R ( K w) 2 WI N D ER O D I B I L I T Y GR O U P 3 HY D R O L O G I C SO I L G R O U P 4 39A Wadena loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 16.8 10.6 0.28 6 B 39B Wadena loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 1.3 0.8 0.28 6 B 129 Cylinder loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.1 0.0 0.20 6 B/D 208 Kato silty clay loam 0.6 0.4 0.24 6 B/D 252 Marshan silty clay loam 9.2 5.8 0.24 6 B/D 411A Waukegan silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 111.4 70.4 0.32 6 B 411B Waukegan silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 16.3 10.3 0.32 6 B 415B Kanaranzi loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2.6 1.6 0.20 6 B Total for Project Area 158.3 100% Source: United States Department of Agriculture: Natural Resources Conservation. Web Soil Survey, https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ 1 Area of Interest (AOI) is slightly larger than AUAR area 2 Erosion factor Kw indicates the susceptibility of a whole soil profile (including rocks) to sheet and rill erosion by water. The estimates in Table X are based primarily on percentage of silt, sand, and organic matter, and on soil structure and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat). Values of Kw range from 0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being equal, the higher the value, the more susceptible the soil is to sheet and rill erosion by water. 3 A wind erodibility group consists of soils that have similar properties affecting their susceptibility to wind erosion in cultivated areas. The soils assigned to group 1 are the most susceptible to erosion, while those assigned to group 8 are the least susceptible. 4 Soils are classified by the NRCS into four hydrologic soil groups, A, B, C, and D with A having the lowest runoff potential (high infiltration rate) and D having the greatest runoff potential (low infiltration rate). If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic soil group (e.g., A/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second letter is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned dual classes. The Project also advanced sixteen (16) soil borings. Results of the soil borings are included in Appendix C and indicate than under a top layer of lean clay (CL) there is between 5.5 and 13.5 feet of glacial outwash (poorly graded sand with silt (SP-SM)) in all borings except ST-3 and ST- 9 which are on the east side of the site, nearest Denmark Avenue. Page 157 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 23 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Construction Activities The site is planned to be graded in phases as each part of the development is constructed, beginning with the north portion of the site, followed by the south portion once the north area has been developed. Earthwork is anticipated to be generally balanced across the site. A rough estimate of earthwork anticipated is 500,000+ cubic yards. Full grading and site development plans will be prepared as part of the land use and development permitting process. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be developed in coordination with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) construction permit which will identify temporary best management practices (BMPs) (e.g., inlet protection, erosion control blanket, silt fence, etc.) to control erosion and stormwater runoff during construction. Operational Activities The project plans and SWPPP will also identify permanent BMPs (seed, mulch, infiltration areas, stormwater ponds) to manage erosion and stormwater runoff after construction is complete. 12. Water resources a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, shoreland classification and floodway/floodplain, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include the presence of aquatic invasive species and the water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. Surface Waters Within one mile of the Project Site, there is one public watercourse – the Vermillion River – two unnamed streams, and three public wetlands. The associated PWI numbers and names of the public water bodies are provided in Table 12. Table 12. Public Waters within 1 Mile of Project Site PUBLIC WATER NAME TYPE AUID PWI NUMBER(S) 303d IMPAIRED WATERS Vermillion River Public Water Watercourse 07040001-517 19010a/M-049 Yes Unnamed Stream Unnamed Stream 07040001-667 19025a/M-049- 013 No Unnamed Stream Unnamed Stream 07040001-527 19023a/M-049- 012 Yes Unnamed Wetland Public Water Wetland 19-0355-00 - No Unnamed Wetland Public Water Wetland 19-0420-00 - No Unnamed Wetland Public Water Wetland 19-0419-00 - No Source: Public Waters Inventory (PWI) Maps, DNR, https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/pwi/maps.html Page 158 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 24 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Impairments The Vermillion River, immediately adjacent to the northwest corner of the Project Site, is designated as impaired for aquatic recreation (fecal coliform), aquatic consumption (mercury in fish tissue), and aquatic life (fish bioassessments, benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen). Unnamed Stream 07040001-527 is designated as impaired for aquatic recreation (fecal coliform), and aquatic life (benthic macroinvertebrates bioassessments, dissolved oxygen, fish bioassessments, and total suspended solids).15 Subwatersheds The Project Site is within three hydrologic subwatersheds of the Vermillion River Watershed as shown in Appendix A – Figure 17. The very southeast corner of the site is within the South Branch subwatershed and surface water flows southeast. The middle and northeastern areas of the site are within the South Creek subwatershed and surface water generally flows northeast. The western and southwestern areas of the site are within the Upper Mainstem subwatershed and surface water generally flows west. Wetlands A wetland delineation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (Kjolhaug). A technical evaluation panel (TEP) will review and confirm the results of the delineation in spring 2026. The wetland delineation preliminarily calculated approximately 3.1 acres of naturally occurring wetlands on the Project Site which are identified in Table 13 and shown in Appendix A – Figure 15. Table 13. Delineated Wetlands on Project Site WETLAND ID ONSITE AREA (acres) 1 0.7 2 0.003 3 2.94 4 0.06 TOTAL 3.073 Source: Wetland Delineation, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. Trout Streams The Vermillion River which flows through the northwest corner of the Project Site is designated as a trout stream, as well as Unnamed Streams 07040001-527 and 0704001-667.16 These streams have special regulations catch and release for brown trout (January 1 through Friday before trout opener, and September 15 to October 15), and statewide regulations for rainbow trout. Shoreland The area of the Project Site within 300 feet of the river is within a shoreland management district. The Project must adhere to Shoreland Management Regulations set forth in City Code 10-6-18 for the area within the shoreland district. 15 “Minnesota’s impaired waters list,” MPCA, April 2024, https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw1-81.xlsx 16 “State Designated Trout Streams,” DNR, 5/14/2020, https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-trout-stream-designations Page 159 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 25 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Floodplain The northeastern portion of the Project Site is near but outside the special flood hazard area of the Vermillion River. Other Special Waters Per DNR geospatial data, there are no wildlife lakes,17 migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lakes,18 or lakes of biological significance 19 within or adjacent to the Project Site. ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. The Minnesota Natural Resources Atlas 20 identifies the depth to the water table as between 1 to 10 feet for the entire Project Site, while soil borings encountered groundwater at depths of 7 to 14 feet. The Minnesota Department of Health Well Index21 and Dakota County well records identify seven (7) existing wells on the Project Site of which one well has been sealed. Several additional wells within one-half mile of the Project Site are identified in the MN Well Index and are shown in Appendix A – Figure 16. If any undocumented wells are discovered during site visits and/or during redevelopment, they should be examined by a licensed well contractor or a Dakota County well inspector to determine status, construction crews should be notified of their presence, and the wells should be protected from damage and contamination. Dakota County can help locate and mark wells using a magnetometer by calling (952) 891-7537. A Dakota County well inspector must be present during any well searches to rule out the presence of a well. If any wells are determined to not have future use, proper procedures will be followed to have the wells sealed by a licensed well contractor. Sealing must meet MDH well-sealing requirements. Table 14. Documented Wells on Project Site WELL ID STATUS YEAR DRILLED DESCRIPTION 410934 Sealed 1997 4-inch drinking water well 608179 Not sealed 1985 4-inch drinking water well 207519 In use 1969 12-inch irrigation well W05649 Not sealed Unknown 1.25-inch drinking water well from 4758 220th Street W05650 Not sealed Unknown 1.25-inch drinking water well from 4752 220th Street W05651 Not sealed Unknown 1.25-inch drinking water well from 4746 220th Street W05999 Not sealed Unknown 6-inch agricultural well 17 “Designated Wildlife Lakes,” DNR, 12/8/2016, https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-designated-wildlife-lakes 18 Migratory Waterfowl Feeding and Resting Areas,” DNR, 4/1/2025, https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-migratory-waterfowl-areas 19 “Lakes of Biological Significance,” DNR, 7/2025, https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-lakes-of-biological-signific 20 “Minnesota Natural Resources Atlas,” Water Table – Depth, MN DNR, accessed 12/9/2025, https://mnatlas.org/gis-tool/ 21 “Minnesota Well Index”, MN Department of Health, accessed 12/9/2025, https://mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/ Page 160 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 26 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Based on the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH) Source Water Protection data, both the Farmington SE and Hastings Wellhead Protection Areas (WPAs) overlap the Project Site, as do the Farmington SE and Hastings Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMA). The groundwater DWSMA and the Groundwater Capture Area near the Project Site are of moderate vulnerability.22 WPAs are areas surrounding public water supply wells that contribute groundwater to the well. In these areas, contamination on the land surface or in water can affect the drinking water supply. Groundwater DWSMAs are areas containing the WPA but outlined by clear boundaries and are managed in a well head protection plan. Further description regarding Project mitigation given the presence of the WPA and DWSMA are provided in b.ii. b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. A proposed City of Farmington project will improve 220th Street W and extend sanitary sewer and watermain along the north boundary of the Project Site. These mains will include stubs to serve the development. The proposed municipal sanitary sewer will ultimately connect to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Lakeville-Farmington interceptor (#7103-1) which provides wastewater collection service to the southwest Farmington area. Wastewater from Farmington is discharged to and treated at the Empire Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). Based on the most recent sanitary sewer extension permit, existing capacity at the Empire WWTP is 28.61 MGD while actual current average daily flow in the past 12 months was 11.66 MGD. Beyond extending the municipal sanitary sewer to the site, additional wastewater infrastructure upgrades will not be required. There are no identified wastewater pre-treatment measures included in the Project scope. Table 15 estimates sanitary sewer flow rates from the Project Site. Table 15. Estimated Sanitary Sewer Flow Rates LAND USE UNITS PERSONS/ UNIT RATE (gal/person/day) TOTAL GALLONS PER DAY (gpd) Single-family detached residential 370 2.95 100 109,150 Source: Comprehensive Sewer Plan, Appendix D of Comprehensive Plan, City of Farmington, September 2019, System Unit Flowrates, https://www.farmingtonmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/307/2040- Comprehensive-Plan-PDF?bidId= 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. If septic systems are part of the project, describe the availability of septage disposal options 22 “South Water Protection Web Map Viewer,” MN Department of Health, accessed 12/9/2025, https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/14825b159b2e4dc686736d98e39ebce7#data_s=id%3AdataSource_1 -198f0ba0c42-layer-8-198f0b75285- layer-6%3A2174 Page 161 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 27 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 within the region to handle the ongoing amounts generated as a result of the project. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. Wastewater discharge will not be to a subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS) or septic system. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Wastewater will not be discharged to any surface water due to the Project. No effects are anticipated to surface or groundwater as effluent will be directed to the MCES Empire WWTP. ii. Stormwater - Describe changes in surface hydrology resulting from change of land cover. Describe the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the project site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss environmental effects from stormwater discharges on receiving waters post construction including how the project will affect runoff volume, discharge rate and change in pollutants. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity and amount with this discussion. For projects requiring NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit coverage, state the total number of acres that will be disturbed by the project and describe the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including specific best management practices to address soil erosion and sedimentation during and after project construction. Discuss permanent stormwater management plans, including methods of achieving volume reduction to restore or maintain the natural hydrology of the site using green infrastructure practices or other stormwater management practices. Identify any receiving waters that have construction-related water impairments or are classified as special as defined in the Construction Stormwater permit. Describe additional requirements for special and/or impaired waters. Existing Conditions The existing condition and use on the Project Site includes agricultural land. Typically, agricultural fields are irrigated and fertilizers containing nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium are commonly applied. Currently, there is no on-site stormwater management. In storm events where runoff exceeds any infiltration capacity, runoff enters wetland areas, natural depressions, and tributaries. The existing site has a gently sloping topography and generally slopes toward the Vermillion River. The majority of the 158.3-acre site will be disturbed by the Project. Construction and Post-Construction Conditions The change in land use to a suburban residential development will likely decrease the amount of suspended solids and increase other components typical of urban runoff, such as oil, grease, and chemicals. The creation of open space within the development will provide some mitigation of potential adverse effects from the increased impervious surfaces. However, it is expected that the volume of runoff will increase over existing conditions during significant storm events because of the increase in impervious surface area. Climate trends indicate future rainfall volumes will increase, potentially leading to increased stormwater volumes and discharge rates. The post-construction condition will be required to manage and store stormwater on site which is anticipated to be an improvement over the existing conditions since the existing site is used for agricultural production, and stormwater runoff is not currently managed in a storm Page 162 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 28 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 event. Stormwater will be managed onsite through a system of curb and gutter, catch basins, pipes, stormwater ponds, and filtration areas. Stormwater Mitigations With the increase of impervious surface area and the proximity to trout streams, special considerations should be incorporated to mitigate effects of increased runoff volume, potential chloride use, and increased temperature of runoff. These mitigations may include: • Designing the development with winter in mind may help use less salt and protect the stream from chloride impairment. • Reuse of stormwater for irrigation of landscaping. • Promoting local business and City participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the MPCA. Stormwater will be managed in accordance with applicable City, Dakota County, VRWJPO, and MPCA standards and rules. All stormwater that leaves the site must meet rate control and quality standards and must account for the increased impervious surface associated with development. Water that does not naturally infiltrate or directly enter the storm sewer system will generally flow toward the constructed stormwater treatment ponds. Outfalls from stormwater ponds to the Vermillion River are strongly discouraged by the DNR. As a designated trout stream, the Vermillion River is highly sensitive to changes in water temperature. Any proposed stormwater outfalls into the Vermillion River would require a DNR Public Waters Work Permit. Land disturbing activities, including material export, will comply with the policies identified in the City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) and the MPCA through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit. The Project will be required to utilize best management practices (BMPs) to prevent erosion and control sedimentation. All BMPs will be described in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared for the Project. The grading and erosion control plans for the Project will be reviewed as a part of the City of Farmington’s land use, development and building permit processes, including review for consistency with the City’s LSWMP. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures, variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the project diminish in quantity or quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency connections. Dewatering As the depth to groundwater is 0-10 feet across the Project Site, dewatering for construction may be necessary. Where granular soils are encountered, sumps and pumps could be used to manage the groundwater conditions for shallower excavations while well points may be required for dewatering of deeper excavations. Page 163 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 29 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Due to the Vermillion River which flows through the northwest corner of the Project Site, the Minnesota DNR may institute dewatering restrictions for the Brook and Brown trout spawning timeframe, which is September 1 to April 1. Any groundwater encountered during utility installation or other excavation will be discharged into temporary sediment basins within the Project Site. A DNR General Permit for Temporary Appropriation may be used for the dewatering if the dewatering volume is less than 50 million gallons and the time of the appropriation is less than 1 year. The Proposer must evaluate the expected water usage as part of the land use permit process and is required to obtain the necessary permit from the DNR. Existing Wells Per the Minnesota Well Index and Dakota County well records,, six wells are documented on the Project Site and are listed in Table 14. Any wells that may be encountered during future earthwork or redevelopment activities that will no longer be used should be properly sealed, and a Well and Boring Sealing Record should be provided by the contractor to the MDH. Post-Construction According to the City of Farmington’s Water Supply Plan, the City operates seven (7) active wells, and two storage tanks, one of which is only used during the summer, with effective storage capacity of around 1.79 million gallons (MG). A siting study for a recommended additional 2.0 MG of storage is being prepared as well as concepts for the site layout to determine the minimum area needed for ground storage and a tower to support the City of Farmington’s future water supply needs. Watermain will connect to the future watermain proposed along 220th Street (two proposed connections. There is also a planned 12-inch watermain east of Denmark Avenue which the Project Site may also connect to. Table 16 provides an estimate of the anticipated gallons per day required by development of Project Site and assumes that the development will accommodate household sizes of an average of 2.95 persons. The estimated use per resident was determined using water usage rates from the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Water System Plan. If water use exceeds 10,000 gallons per day (GPD) or one million gallons per year, a water appropriation permit must be obtained from the Minnesota DNR. Table 16. Estimated Water Supply USE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATED RESIDENTS1 WATER USAGE RATE2 PEAKING FACTOR2 GALLONS PER DAY (gpd) Residential 370 1,092 88 gpcd 2.7 259,340 1 Average household size of 2.95 per City of Farmington Comprehensive Plan 2 Per capita water demand and peaking factor per City of Farmington Water System Plan, Page 4 https://www.farmingtonmn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/307/2040-Comprehensive-Plan-PDF?bidId= iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated Page 164 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 30 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable locations. Any wetland or wetland buffer impacts must comply with all wetland replacement or mitigation rules and regulations established by the City of Farmington in 10-6-1 Wetland Standards off the City Code. Where a buffer is required, the City requires protection of the buffer under a conservation easement or inclusion of the buffer in a dedicated outlot as part of platting and subdivision approval. b) Other surface waters - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features, taking into consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. Stormwater ponds will be constructed and designed to manage quantity and quality including rate and volume control as outlined in 11-4-5 Postconstruction Stormwater Management of the City Code. To protect groundwater sources, any stormwater features located in areas with less than three feet of separation to the water table and in areas sensitive to groundwater contamination are recommended to have a Level 1 liner to prevent groundwater contamination. The post-construction condition will be required to comply with all stormwater management rules established by the City of Farmington, Dakota County, VRWJPO, and MPCA, and the condition may be improved from the existing agricultural condition since buffer areas will be reestablished, and surface waters will be managed. Current Minnesota climate trends indicate that the area will experience greater rainfall and precipitation. The construction of wetland buffers, stormwater management areas, and open spaces will help to reduce the quantity and improve the quality of stormwater leaving the site post-construction. 13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes a. Pre-project site conditions Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or proximate to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) was completed by Braun Intertec, dated December 5, 2025 (see Appendix D). The Phase I ESA revealed the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the Project Site: Page 165 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 31 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 • Stains were noted on the concrete floor of the barn/workshop building where it is assumed farm-related maintenance activities occurred. Petroleum products (machinery related maintenance products) and a part washing station were observed within the barn/workshop building. The Project Site has been used for cultivate agricultural purposes and developed with farmstead buildings for at least 90 years. Based on the use and storage or petroleum products and hazardous substances over an extended period of time, the potential for the historical releases of hazardous materials or petroleum products to the subsurface at the Project Site is a REC. • According to information provided by the Project Site owner, a corn crib was dismantled and buried at the Project Site approximately 40 years ago. The corn crib building materials were reportedly buried east of the metal storage building. The buried building debris at the Project Site reported by the owner is a REC. The Phase I ESA revealed no Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs). Phase II Environmental Site Assessment A Phase II ESA was also completed by Braun Intertec, dated December 5, 2025 (see Appendix E). The purpose of the Phase II ESA was to investigate the RECs discovered during the Phase I ESA. The Phase II ESA concluded that no contaminants were detected at concentrations exceeding applicable regulatory criteria in the soil or soil vapor samples collected. Based on the results of the investigation, it does not appear that soil or vapor has been impacted by the RECs identified in the Phase I ESA. In addition, no buried debris was observed in the fifteen test pits advanced in the area where the corn crib was reportedly buried. If buried building debris is encountered during redevelopment activities, the debris-laden soils should be managed appropriately and may require disposal at a landfill facility permitted to receive such waste. Based on the results of the Phase II ESA, no additional actions are recommended to evaluate the RECs identified in the Phase I ESA. What’s in My Neighborhood A review of the MPCA’s What’s in My Neighborhood (WIMN) database was conducted to identify potentially contaminated non-agricultural sites within or in the vicinity of the Project Area. No active sites were identified within the Project Site boundaries. Within one mile of the Project Site, twenty-six (26) active potentially contaminated sites were identified. The Project will not directly impact any of the nearby existing potentially contaminated sites; thus, adverse effects because of the Project are not anticipated. It should be noted that there are also several active construction stormwater permits downstream of the Project Site, within the watershed of the Vermillion River. Temporary and permanent stormwater BMPs will be implemented during and after construction of the Project to minimize adverse impacts of erosion and sediment loading. Table 17 summarizes potential sites within one mile of the Project Site. Table 17. Potentially Contaminated Sites within One Mile of Project Site SITE ID LOCATION MPCA PROGRAM STATUS Within One Mile of Project Site 24565 Valley Cabinet, 5092 220th St W Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Active, registered 1985 212799 Legacy Partners of Farmington, 22300 Denmark Ave Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Active, registered 2018 Page 166 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 32 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 SITE ID LOCATION MPCA PROGRAM STATUS 109929 Farmington City Fire Department, 21625 Denmark Ave Aboveground Tanks Active, registered 2009 4358 Dakota Electric Association, 4300 220th St W Air Quality, Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator, Aboveground Tanks Air quality – active, registered 1998; Hazardous Waste – active, annual generator license since 2008; Aboveground Tanks – active, registered 1998 70192 Robert F Adelmann Farm, 22553 Denmark Ave Feedlots Active, registered 2001 69646 Thomas Conroy Farm, 23145 Denmark Ave Feedlots Active, registered 2001 127330 MCI Drywall, 21205 Eaton Ave Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 2013 97456 Family Health Medical Clinic Farmington, 4645 Knutsen Dr Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Active, registered 2007 29777 ISD 192 Boeckman Middle School, 800 Denmark Ave Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator, Underground Tanks Hazardous Waste – active, registered 2010; Underground Tanks – active, registered 1986 29813 Smith, Dennis W, 998 Honeysuckle Ln Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Active, registered 1985 20489 American Pressworks, 716 1st St Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Active, registered 1985 53126 RJ Restorations, Inc., 701 1st St Ste B Hazardous Waste – small quantity generator Active, registered 2017 38693 City of Farmington, 710 1st St Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Active, registered 1985 38684 Woodland Products, Inc., 701 1st St Ste A Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 1985 115406 Installed Building Solutions, 517 1st St Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 2006 93620 New Decade Laboratories, 821 3rd St Ste C Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 2003 21107 Dakota Turf Inc., 820 3rd St Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 1985 25950 Block’s Auto Service, 805 3rd St Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Hazardous Waste – active, registered 1985; Aboveground Tanks – active, registered 1995 105594 Farmington Elementary School, 500 Maple St Underground Tanks Active, registered 1986 5074 FAA Minneapolis Center/ZMP ARTCC, 521 Division St Aboveground Tanks, Underground Tanks Aboveground Tanks – active, registrations received 2014 and 2002; Underground Page 167 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 33 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 SITE ID LOCATION MPCA PROGRAM STATUS Tanks – active, registration received 1986 4319 Minneapolis Air Route Traffic Control Ct, 512 Division St Air Quality, Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Air Quality – active, registration issued 2008; Hazardous Waste – active, registered 1985 47298 Northfield TACC, 519 Division St S Hazardous Waste – minimal quantity generator Active, registered prior to 2000 107809 Schmidtke Fuels Inc., 122 Spruce St Aboveground Tanks Active, registration received 1990 28849 Blahas Collision Center, 201 Spruce St Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 1985 131097 CarQuest of Farmington 2112, 210 Oak St Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 1985 20035 Farmington Chiropractic Clinic, 115 Elm St Ste F Hazardous Waste – very small quantity generator Active, registered 1985 Source: “What’s in My Neighborhood,” MPCA, https://mpca.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9d45793c75644e05bac197525f633f87 A review of the Department of Agriculture’s (MDA) WIMN database was also conducted to identify potentially contaminated agricultural sites within or in the vicinity of the Project Site. The MDA is the lead agency for response to, and cleanup of agricultural chemical contamination in Minnesota. There are no MDA sites within the Project Site boundaries. Within one mile of the Project Site, one (1) site is identified, detailed in Table 18. The Project will not directly impact this closed site; thus, adverse effects because of the Project are not anticipated. Table 18. Potentially Contaminated Agricultural Sites within One Mile of Project Site LOCATION ID LOCATION CONTAMINANT STATUS Within One Mile of Project Site 181101008277 County Road 3 near Willow Street Unknown Closed Source: “What’s in My Neighborhood,” Minnesota Department of Agriculture, https://mnag.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=85bade4ea512411aa32a80079246255f b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. During construction, the Project will generate solid waste and construction waste material. All waste generated will be properly disposed of off-site. Post-construction, residents and tenants will generate municipal solid waste which will be hauled away by licensed garbage haulers. Residents will be encouraged to recycle. Waste generation estimates are provided in Table 19 and are based on the MPCA’s municipal solid waste generation per person. Page 168 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 34 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Table 19. Estimated Waste LAND USE ESTIMATED SIZE EST. RESIDENTS1 Rate (lbs/person/day)2 Total (lbs/day) Residential 370 units 1,092 2.4 1,332 1 Average household size of 2.95 per City of Farmington Comprehensive Plan 2 Source: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2018 Fact Sheet, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/2018_ff_fact_sheet.pdf c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any new above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Indicate the number, location, size and age of existing tanks on the property that the project will use. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Development of the Project and related site work will be required to comply with all City, County, NPDES, and other regulatory permits necessary to complete the work. Storage of hazardous materials on the Project Site during construction will be limited to construction vehicles and machinery. This equipment, in addition to temporary storage tanks for diesel fuel or hydraulic fluids, may be left onsite through the duration of construction depending on phasing and scheduling. Construction vehicles, as well as associated storage of their fuels, will be required to follow a spill prevention plan, if applicable. No hazardous materials will be permitted or stored on the Project Site post-construction. d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling During construction and site work, vehicles containing gasoline will be present onsite. The construction and development process will not involve significant amounts of hazardous waste. Any hazardous waste generated will be properly disposed of in accordance with state and federal laws. 14. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. The Project Site is in the Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province (222), the Minnesota and NE Iowa Morainal Section (222M), and the Oak Savannah Subsection (222Me) as defined by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in the Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota – The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province.23 Presently, most of the subsection is farmed. As shown in Table 4. Cover Types Before and After, and Appendix A – Figure 9 sourced from the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS), the existing site’s coverage is 23 “Oak Savannah Subsection,” DNR, accessed 12/9/2025, https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ecs/222Me/index.html Page 169 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 35 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 predominantly classified as agricultural land, which is consistent with the existing land use. The other predominant cover types are wetland emergent vegetation and some impervious areas (gravel roads). Land to the south is agricultural, and to the south is agricultural and wetland emergent vegetation. Land to the north was recently developed with residential housing. The presence of grassland, wetlands, trees and agricultural land are likely to provide nesting, foraging, and travel habitat for a variety of wildlife species including squirrels, rabbits, deer, coyotes, foxes, passerine birds, raptors, and other small mammals. Reptiles and amphibians may be present in and near wetland areas and near the Vermillion River. Post-construction, the development will cause changes to existing habitats. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designates specific geographic areas that contain features essential for the conservation of threatened or endangered species and that may require special management and protection. There are no critical habitats designated by the USFWS within or near the Project Site.24 b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or proximate to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA- ) and/or correspondence number (MCE- ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage Review letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. Minnesota Biological Survey The Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, Natural Communities and Rare Species of Dakota County, Minnesota map was reviewed, and no natural communities or rare species are identified on or proximate to the Project Site.25 MnDNR Natural Heritage Review A DNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS)26 review request through the Minnesota Conservation Explorer (MCE) system was submitted as part of this EAW process, and an automated Natural Heritage Review (NHR) letter (MCE# 2025-00907) was received from the MnDNR on February 12, 2026 (see Appendix B). The NHR letter identifies the following state-listed endangered or threatened species that have the potential to be impacted by the proposed Project: Blanding’s Turtles Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state-listed threatened species, have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed Project. Blanding’s turtles use upland areas up to and over a mile distance from wetlands, waterbodies, and watercourses. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Bats All of Minnesota’s bats, including the federally endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), can be found throughout Minnesota. During the active season (approximately April – November) bats roost underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. 24 “Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species,” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, accessed 11/11/2025, https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe09893cf75b8dbfb77 25 “Natural Communities and Rare Species of Dakota County, Minnesota,” Minnesota Biological Survey, 1997, https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/mcbs/maps/dakota.pdf 26 “Natural Heritage Information System,” DNR, undated, accessed 7/15/2025, https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/nhnrp/nhis.html Page 170 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 36 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Rusty Patched Bumble Bee The Project Site overlaps with a USFWS Rusty Patched Bumble Bee high potential zone. The Rusty Patched Bumble Bee is federally listed as endangered and is anticipated to be listed as an endangered species in Minnesota in 2026. This species is likely to be present in suitable habitat (shrub/tree cover and the surrounding 100 feet of vegetation within high potential zones. USFWS Federally Protected Species The USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool27 was queried to identify federally listed threatened and endangered species within or near the Project Site. The response is included in Appendix B (Project Code: 2026-0024932). Five federally listed threatened, endangered, or candidate species were listed that may occur within or near the Project Site. • Tricolored Bat – Proposed Endangered • Whooping Crane – Experimental Population, Non-Essential • Monarch Butterfly – Proposed Threatened • Rusty Patched Bumble Bee – Endangered • Western Regal Fritillary – Proposed Threatened Other species are identified by the USFWS as having potential to be impacted by projects in or near the Project Site if these species are found to be present: Bald and Golden Eagles The bald eagle has been removed from the endangered species list; however, this species and the golden eagle are protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The Proposer is required to survey the area for any migratory bird nests prior to the commencement of site work. Migratory Birds The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Service. The Proposer is encouraged to implement recommendations that minimize potential impacts to migratory birds. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project including how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general location of the project may influence the effects. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. The proposed Project will alter the land cover and habitat within the Project Site. As previously described, the Project Site has predominantly been used for agricultural production and the land has been moderately to significantly disturbed by human activity. If the current agricultural production were maintained, climate trends would likely exacerbate the continued degradation of the site given the likelihood of increasing rainfall and storm events. Impacts to State-Listed Species Blanding’s Turtles Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage, and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. The proposed 27 “Information for Planning and Consulting (IPaC),” DNR, accessed 8/26/2025, https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/ Page 171 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 37 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 project has the potential to impact the Blanding’s turtle through direct fatalities and habitat disturbance/destruction. As bats and the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee were also included in the USFWS letter, impacts to these species are addressed under Impacts to Federally Listed Species below. Impacts to Federally Listed Species The list of federally listed species was submitted to the USFWS to solicit an effects determination of the Project on the identified species. The following list of species and determinations of effect is provided by USFWS (see Appendix B for letters from USFWS): Table 20. Federally Listed Species in/near Project Site and Effects Determination SPECIES STATUS EFFECTS DETERMINATION Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) Proposed Endangered May effect Whooping Crane (Grus americana) Experimental Population, Non-Essential No effect Monarch Butterfly (Danaus Plexippus) Proposed Threatened No effect Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis) Endangered No effect Western Regal Fritillary (Agrynnis idalia occidentalis) Proposed Threatened No determination A determination of “may effect” was provided by USFWS regarding the Tricolored Bat. Tricolored Bat The tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) is associated with forested landscapes where they forage near trees and along waterways. Maternity and other summer roosts probably are mainly in dead or live tree foliage. Maternity colonies may also use human-made structures (buildings, bridges, etc.) or tree cavities. A determination was not provided by the USFWS regarding the Western Regal Fritillary; however, their habitat is similar to the Monarch Butterfly per USFWS species information. Both the Western Regal Fritillary and the Monarch Butterfly are pollinators found in tall-grass prairies with milkweed and other native flowering plants. Given that the USFWS determined that development of the Project Site was determined to have no effect on the Monarch Butterfly, it is assumed that the conclusion is the same for the Western Regal Fritillary. It is likely that the habitat quality will improve under the proposed Project since the agricultural land cover will transition from heavily cultivated fields to residential uses. The 28.7-acre gas pipeline easement will remain open space and is recommended to be seeded with pollinator plants to promote suitable habitat for pollinating species. In addition, the Project’s concept plan protects 3.1 acres of existing wetlands, and provides 31 acres of open space and stormwater ponding areas. The conversion of cropland will require onsite stormwater and surface water management that complies with the City rules and regulations. Development will be required to account for and provide necessary compensatory storage to offset the creation of impervious surfaces. A few small stands of trees near the existing home and farm are proposed to be removed which may impact bats if found to be present. Tree removal has the potential to negatively impact bats by destroying roosting habitat, especially during the pup rearing season when females are forming maternity roosting colonies and the pups cannot yet fly. Page 172 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 38 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Invasive Species Invasive species are a major cause of biodiversity loss and are considered biological pollutants by the DNR. Invasive species can be transported on construction equipment, landscaping equipment, and other debris. Invasive species pose a significant threat to native ecosystems and biodiversity, and their spread is a major concern during both the construction and operational phases of a project. These species can be unintentionally introduced through construction equipment, vehicles, and materials that carry seeds, plant fragments, or soil from invested areas. Once established, invasive species can outcompete native vegetation, alter soil chemistry, and degrade habitat quality for wildlife. Disturbed soils and exposed areas created during construction provide ideal conditions for these species to take hold and spread rapidly. Without proper management, invasive species can lead to long-term ecological imbalances and increased maintenance costs. d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, ecosystems, and sensitive ecological resources. The following mitigation measures are identified by the DNR and USFWS to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to protected species and wildlife habitats. The Proposer will be responsible for complying with the following recommended mitigation: State Listed Species The Proposer and its contractors must comply with the following measures: Blanding’s Turtles • Avoid wetland and aquatic impacts during overwintering season, between September 15 and April 15, if the area is suitable for overwintering. o Wetlands and aquatic habitats that freeze solid to the bed (no liquid water) are not suitable overwintering habitat. However, Blanding’s turtles will overwinter in wetlands and aquatic habitat where ice has closed over the water’s surface. • Limit erosion and sediment control to wildlife friendly erosion control.28 • Check bare ground, including trenches, holes, or depressions, within construction areas for turtles before the use of heavy equipment or any ground disturbance. • The Blanding’s turtle flyer 29 must be given to all contractors working in the area. • Report any sightings using the DNR Plant and Animal Observation Form.30 • If turtles are in imminent danger, move them by hand out of harm’s way; otherwise, they are to be left undisturbed. Directions on how to move turtles safely can be found at Helping Turtles Across the Road.31 If the above measures are not feasible, Proposer should contact Review.NHIS@state.mn.us as a project-specific avoidance plan will likely be needed to demonstrate avoidance. Additional Blanding’s turtle avoidance measures may include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: • Recommendations from List 1 of the Blanding’s turtle fact sheet.32 If greater protection for turtles is desired, implement recommendations from List 2. 28 “Wildlife Friendly Erosion Control,” MnDNR, 2013, https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/nongame/wildlife-friendly-erosion-control.pdf 29 “Blanding’s turtle flyer,” MnDNR, March 2008, https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/natural_resources/animals/reptiles_amphibians/turtles/blandings_turtle/flyer.pdf 30 “MNDNR Plant and Animal Observations,” MnDNR, undated, https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/f1cf3334dd7d4200a30bb003a13f4e29?portalUrl=https://gis.dnr.state.mn.us/arcgis 31 “Helping Turtles Across the Road,” MnDNR, accessed 2/13/2026, https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/reptiles_amphibians/helping-turtles-roads.html 32 “Blanding’s Turtle,” Environmental Review Fact Sheet, MnDNR, undated, https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/natural_resources/animals/reptiles_amphibians/turtles/blandings_turtle/factsheet.pdf Page 173 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 39 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 • Avoid hydro-mulch products that contain any materials with synthetic (plastic) fiber additives, as the fibers can re-suspend and flow into waterbodies. • Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below grade. If curbs must be used, install wilslife friendly curbs to allow turtles to leave the road. Stormwater inlets should be designed to prevent turtles from falling into the storm sewer. Tricolored Bat, Northern Long-Eared Bat, and other bats The Proposer must plan for tree removal and grubbing should be avoided from June 1 through August 15 which is the bat pupping season. If presence of bats is indicated, any additional tree clearing should occur outside of the bat active season of April 1 to November 14. Bald Eagles, Golden Eagles, and migratory birds To avoid impacts to Bald Eagles, Golden Eagles, and migratory birds, a visual survey of the area planned for tree clearing should be performed to look for any migratory bird nests. Avoid and minimize disturbances to eagles whenever practicable. If eagle disturbance cannot be avoided, a permit must be sought for any removal, relocation, or obstruction of an eagle nest. If presence of migratory birds is indicated, avoid removing these trees March 1 through August 30 to minimize potential impacts to the nesting season of migratory birds. In addition, project lighting should be chosen with care as lighting cycles, direction, and hues can all adversely impact migratory birds and other species. The DNR recommends that any projects using LED luminaries follow the MnDOT Approved Products for Luminaries 33 and select a color temperature below 2700K. In addition to the above mitigation measures, the Project includes open space and stormwater treatment areas to minimize the effects of the redevelopment on native species. Native seed mixes and plants for stormwater features and landscaping are recommended by the DNR to provide habitat for pollinators, and because native plants require fewer soil inputs and irrigation than traditional landscaping. Native seed mixes are also helpful to help with erosion control and surface water management which will assist with on-site management and further reduce runoff that could affect off-site water bodies. 15. Historic properties Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or proximate to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. The Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory Portal 34 was queried and identified one (1) historic property documented within the Project Site. The historic railroad corridor associated with XX-RRD- CSP041 traveled diagonally through the south portion of the Project Site. The railroad has since been removed and there is no longer a visual expression of the linear corridor. As a result, the corridor lacks integrity of location, design, materials, workmanship, setting, feeling, and association. The property was evaluated and determined to be not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Within one-half mile of the Project Site, there are five (5) historic properties, listed in Table 21 – two culverts which were evaluated and determined to be not eligible for the NRHP, and three that have not been evaluated. The culverts are beyond the limits that will be impacted by roadway improvements 33 “Light Emitting Diode (LED) res area luminaries,” MnDOT, undated, https://www.dot.state.mn.us/products/roadwaylighting/ledrestarea.html 34 “Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory,” MN SHPO, accessed 7/15/2026, https://mnship.gisdata.mn.gov/public-map Page 174 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 40 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 within the Project scope on 220th Street W and 225th Street W. The barn and silo on Denmark Avenue in Castle Rock Township appear to have been removed since they were documented. Stands of trees block the view of the Project Site from the Dakota County Fairgrounds Within one mile of the Project Site, there are many more historic properties in SHPO’s inventory associated with Farmington’s historic downtown. None of the properties have a view of the Project Site or will have direct impacts resulting from the Project. Per the Office of the State Archaeologist’s (OSA) public viewer 35, no archaeological sites are known to exist within or directly adjacent to the Project Site. Table 21. Historic Properties within 1/2 mile of Project Site HISTORIC INVENTORY NO. PROPERTY TYPE NAT’L REGISTER LISTED OR ELIGIBLE XX-RRD-CSP041 Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company Not eligible, evaluated DK-FMC-00079 Culvert 96495 at 220th St W over Vermillion River Not eligible DK-EUR-00022 Culvert 19520 at 225th St W over Vermillion River Not eligible DK-CRK-00004 Barn & Silo on Denmark Avenue Not evaluated DK-FMC-00077 Dance Hall, Dakota County Fairgrounds Not evaluated DK-CRK-00006 Old Bank Building, Dakota County Fairgrounds Not evaluated Source: Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory, SHPO, https://mnship.gisdata.mn.gov/public-map 16. Visual a. Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The transition of the Project Site from agricultural uses to a residential development will impact the visual appearance of the site. The proposed Project will create new single-family residential neighborhoods, roadways, stormwater facilities and open spaces. No vapor plumes, glare or intense light is anticipated as a result of the Project. Post construction, any proposed exterior/site lighting associated with the Project will be required to be downcast and must meet footcandle requirements at the property lines in compliance with the City’s ordinances. Landscaping including vegetated setback areas, street trees and other open spaces will be integrated into the development plan. The landscape plan, including any recommended screening, berms, fencing, and vegetation will be address as part of the land use and development permitting process. During construction, appropriate screening of truck entrances, garbage enclosures, and other development features that may adversely impact adjacent residential areas may be required. There are no known scenic views or vistas on or near the Project Site. 17. Air a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human 35 “Office of the State Archaeologist Portal – Public Map,” Minnesota Department of Administration, State Archaeologist, accessed 10/23/2025, https://osaportal.gisdata.mn.gov/public-map Page 175 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 41 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. The Project will not generate stationary source emissions exceeding the mandatory EAW thresholds specified in Minnesota Rules Part 4410.4300, Subp. 15, nor will it require an air permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Per Item 18, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from this Project are not expected to have significant environmental effects. The Project's air emissions will be typical of those of residential developments, potentially including sources like natural gas and oil-powered appliances and equipment, fertilizer use, and heating and cooling systems. These emissions generally fall under Conditionally Insignificant Activities and Conditionally Exempt Stationary Sources according to Minnesota Rules Part 7007.1300. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. The Proposed Project will develop the site for residential uses. Motor vehicle emissions will be generated from vehicles traveling to and from the development site, and from construction equipment to perform the construction activities. Following full project site development, vehicle related emissions including carbon monoxide levels are anticipated to rise slightly due to the increase in the number of trips to and from the site. During construction and post-construction, trucks and equipment are not permitted to idle while not in use or if parked on site. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 17a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. The Project is not anticipated to produce significant dust or odors during construction, material export, or operation. Any minor odors generated during construction will be typical of those associated with residential development, such as exhaust from diesel or gasoline-powered equipment. Grading, construction, and material export activities will temporarily generate dust. To mitigate this, BMPs such as dust control by using watering trucks or other methods as agreed to with the City to protect the adjacent neighborhoods will be implemented. The nearby existing residential neighborhoods will be the nearest receptors of dust and odors, which should be monitored throughout the construction process by the Proposer. Odors generated during construction will be mitigated by proper maintenance of the equipment according to the manufacturer's specifications. 18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint a. GHG Quantification: For all proposed projects, provide quantification and discussion of project GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide project-specific emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the process used to come to that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation. The projected greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are provided on an average annual basis using the CO2 equivalent (CO2e) and include a best estimate of average annual emissions over the life of the proposed Project. Emissions were estimated using the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Page 176 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 42 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (SGEC)36, the EIE’s Energy Consumption Survey Dashboard37, the EPS’s Advancing Sustainable Materials Fact Sheet 38, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) annually published Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) report 39. Estimates are summarized in Tables 22 and 23 by project phase and source type. Direct emissions refer to those under the ownership or control of the reporting company, classified as Scope 1. Indirect emissions stem from sources controlled by other entities but are influenced by the reporting company, like off-site electricity generation. These are classified as Scope 2 or Scope 3. Table 22. Construction Emissions CATEGORY SCOPE TYPE OF EMISSION EMISSION SUB-TYPE EMISSION PROJECT-RELATED CO2e EMISSIONS (tons/year) Direct 1 Combustion -Diesel Mobile Construction Equipment N2O, CH4 2,869 Direct 1 Combustion - Diesel Passenger Cars N2O, CH4 6,701 TOTAL 9,570 Table 23. Operational Emissions CATEGORY SCOPE TYPE OF EMISSION EMISSION SUB-TYPE EMISSION PROJECT-RELATED CO2e EMISSIONS (tons/year) Indirect 2 Off-Site Electricity Production Grid-Based CO2, N2O, CH4 1,571 Indirect 3 Off-Site Waste Management Area CO2, CH4 298 TOTAL 1,869 The emissions in Tables 22 and 23 are reported in CO2 short tons (English units), per EQB guidance. Worksheets for each source using the SGEC are provided in Appendix F. Scope 1 emissions calculations reflect an estimate of emissions generated over one year of construction. Approximately 10 pieces of mobile diesel equipment will be on-site and operate at 144 gallons each per day. Scope 1 emissions also assume that there will be approximately 10 workers who commute an average of 10 miles to the site. Scope 2 and 3 emission calculations assume that the Project Site will feature approximately 370 residential units that utilize off-site electricity production and waste management at levels that are comparable to other residential developments within the State of Minnesota. The Project will utilize energy within the MROW (West) eGRID subregion, which generates energy with 35% coal, 38% wind, 8% nuclear, 13% gas, 4% hydro, and about 1% solar sources. 36 “Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/simplified-ghg-emissions-calculator 37 “Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) Dashboard – Site electricity consumption per household,” US Energy Information Administration, https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/cbf6875974554a74823232f84f563253?src=%E2%80%B9%20Consumption%20%20%20%20%20%20Resi dential%20Energy%20Consumption%20Survey%20(RECS)-b1 38 “Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2018 Fact Sheet,” Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/documents/2018_ff_fact_sheet_dec_2020_fnl_508.pdf 39 “2022 SCORE Report,” Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/mpca.data.services/viz/2022SCOREReport/2022SCOREreport Page 177 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 43 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 b. GHG Assessment i. Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. The following are potential design strategies and sustainability measures that are under consideration for the proposed development to reduce emissions: • Use energy efficient appliances, equipment, and lighting • Energy efficient and electricity-reliant HVAC systems • Energy efficient and low embodied carbon (LEC) building materials • Implement waste best management practices (BPMs) and to recycle and compost appropriate material when applicable • On-site landscaping will absorb water • Additional native landscaping will be planted to improve local air quality, absorb greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce local urban heat island effect • Buildings will be constructed with rooftop-ready infrastructure for solar power generation • Provide electric vehicle ready charging infrastructure Implementation of the above strategies will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on code requirements, feasibility, availability of materials, schedule, and tenant considerations. ii. Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the project’s GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred. The potential mitigation listed in Item 18.b.i. was selected to comply with best management practices for new construction and reduce GHG emissions where practicable during operations. iii. Quantify the proposed projects predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons/# of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or local GHG reduction goals. The project does not have an estimated lifetime. It is estimated that the project will emit a total of 103,020 CO2e metric tons over the next 50 years. The proposer will evaluate implementing the sustainability measures listed in Item 18.b.i. to reduce operational emissions to the extent practicable. The proposed project will be built in compliance with state regulations and city building codes. Construction Emissions * Years of Construction + Operational Emissions * 50 Years = Estimated Cumulative 50 Year Emissions 9,570*7+ 1,869*50 =160,440 The Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act set goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% between 2005 and 2050 while maintaining reliable and affordable energy. In 2023, the state Legislature updated these goals to reflect the state’s Climate Action Framework which includes reducing greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030 from a 2005 baseline and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. Development of the Project Site will perpetuate reliance on personal vehicles. The emissions generated from Development will increase GHG emissions if mitigation is not incorporated into a project. The Proposer should consider mitigations such as those listed in 18.a.i. above and others such as green building technologies, low-maintenance landscaping with native plantings, options for electric vehicle charging, grey water reuse for irrigation to mitigate for increased emissions. Page 178 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 44 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 19. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. During construction of the Project, there will be additional noise generated beyond existing conditions. Development of the Project will commence with site grading. A temporary increase in noise level will occur during the construction phase and the noise level intensity will vary based on the type of construction equipment used. To minimize the potential effects of noise pollution, construction volumes and work hours will be limited to those established by the City of Farmington’s ordinances, which will be identified during the land use permitting process. Construction hours will be limited to daytime hours, with additional restrictions to comply with all local and state rules and ordinances. Typical noise levels associated with different types of equipment are provided in Table 24 at 50 feet from the noise source. Over distance, sound attenuates or is reduced in amplitude and is perceived as becoming quieter. When the distance is doubled from a point source, such as construction equipment, the sound level decreases 6 decibels. Table 24. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) Default Noise Emission Reference Levels EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL MEASURED LMAX @ 50 FEET (dBA, slow) Backhoe 65 dBA Air Compressor 70 dBA Excavator 81 dBA Front End Loader 79 dBA Paver 77 dBA Roller 80 dBA Source: FHWA Construction Noise Handbook, Table 9.1 RCNM Default Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors, 8/24/2017, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/handbook/handbook09.cfm Post-construction, the site will likely generate an increase in noise over existing conditions and will be roughly equivalent to the levels generated by residential and commercial developments in other parts of the city. However, the Project Site is adjacent to urban development and is a logical location for new development, so this increase is anticipated. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) enforces noise standards (Minnesota Rules Chapter 7030). Table 25 is a summary of the statutory noise limit standards for residential (NAC1) and retail/commercial receptors (NAC2). Table 25. Statutory Noise Limit Standards USE DAYTIME (7 am – 10 pm) NIGHTTIME (10 pm – 7 am) L10* L50** L10 L50 Residential (NAC1) 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 50 dBA Retail, business, and government services (NAC2) 70 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 65 dBA Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2015). A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/p-gen6-01.pdf *L10 calculation is the noise level that is exceeded for 10% of an hour. **L50 calculation is the noise level exceeded for 50% of an hour. The Project is required to operate in compliance with Minnesota Noise Standards. If noise impacts are determined to be above the state standards, potential contributions will be assessed to pinpoint primary sources and determine optimal methods for noise reduction. Page 179 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 45 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 20. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. The Project Site is in the southwest quadrant of Denmark Avenue (CSAH 31) and 220th Street W, and will have full access connections to 220th street W, Denmark Avenue, and 225th Street W. The proposed development consists of 370 single-family dwelling units, each with off-street parking. A Traffic Impact Study was completed for the Proposed Project by Traffic Impact Group and revised based on comments received from Dakota County during the public comment process, dated April 29, 2026 (see Appendix G). Table 26 provides the estimated total average daily traffic generated by the Project. The analysis was completed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition. The applicable land use was determined to be 210: Single-Family Detached Housing. Table 26: Trip Generation Summary ITE CODE LAND USE DWELLING UNITS DAILY TRIPS TRIPS GENERATED AM PEAK PM PEAK ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT 210 Single-Family Detached Housing 370 3,251 68 185 199 122 Farmington is not served by Metro Transit’s regular route bus service, but is served by Transit Link, shared-ride public transportation offered in areas where regular route transit service is infrequent or unavailable. The recently constructed residential development north of 220th Street W includes sidewalks on one side of Denton Ave. b. Discuss the effect of traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance. Dakota County has directed that right-turn lanes are required at accesses on County Roads due to the size of the proposed development. The County Road 31 & County Road 74 Study, being led by Dakota County, will examine intersection control options for the intersection of Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W. The study is ongoing and results were not available during preparation of the Traffic Impact Study. Analysis shows that the intersection of Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W is expected to see Levels of Service (LOS) F under the full-build scenario of the Project (year 2030). Projected future volumes, including 13-hour data plus time-of-day extrapolated development trips, indicate that the intersection is expected to meet warrants the following warrants: • Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Volumes o Condition A (minimum vehicular volume) o Condition A+B • Warrant 2, Four-Hour Volumes Page 180 of 454 December 2022 Version Vermillion Reserve – Final EAW Page | 46 Farmington, MN May 13, 2026 c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. It is recommended to monitor volumes at the intersection of Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W and implement signalized control when volumes meet warrants. At Denmark Avenue & Accesses C (church/senior living driveway) and D (see Figure 3 of the revised Traffic Impact Study), to construct southbound right-turn lanes with 300 feet of deceleration plus a 180-foot taper. 21. Cumulative potential effects (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. While the initial phase of development may not result in traffic volumes that meet traffic signal warrants, it is anticipated that full build-out of the Project Site (by year 2030) will result in LOS F at the Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W intersection. The timing of intersection improvements should be coordinated with recommendations from Dakota County’s County Road 31 & County Road 74 Study, and phasing of the Vermillion Reserve development. Any environmental impacts must comply with all Federal, State, and local rules and regulations and appropriate permits must be obtained. Required mitigation measures and permit conditions must be followed. Potential impacts outside the permitting process have been properly evaluated as part of this EAW. Therefore, there are no cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project anticipated provided proper mitigation is followed. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. There are no other known immediate development plans, but future development in the area is likely. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. Development of the Proposed Project is not anticipated to cause adjacent development activities. The surrounding agricultural area in Eureka Township has potential for future urban expansion. Urban expansion may trigger the need for additional environmental review processes in the future. Given the information contained within this EAW analysis, there are no known impacts that are not addressed through recommended mitigation within this review. 22. Other potential environmental effects If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. No additional environmental effects have been identified. Page 181 of 454 APPENDICES Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: Agency Reviews Appendix C: Geotechnical Boring Logs Appendix D: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix E: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Appendix F: Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Calculator Analysis Appendix G: Traffic Study Page 182 of 454 APPENDIX A Figures Figure 1. Project Location Figure 2. USGS Quad Map Figure 3. Concept Plan Figure 4: Project Phasing Figure 5. Average Annual Temperature Figure 6. Projected Average Annual Temperature Figure 7. Average Annual Precipitation Figure 8. Projected Average Annual Precipitation Figure 9. MLCCS Cover Types Figure 10. City of Farmington – Existing Land Use Figure 11. Eureka Township – Existing Land Use Figure 12. City of Farmington – Future Land Use Figure 13. MUSA Staging Map Amendment Figure 14. NRCS Soil Survey Figure 15. Surface Water Resources Figure 16. Groundwater Resources Figure 17. Vermillion River Subwatersheds Page 183 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 1 0 500 1,000250 Feet EAGAN EMPIRELAKEVILLE ROSEMOUNT EUREKA TWP DOUGLAS TWPHAMPTON TWP MARSHAN TWP BURNSVILLE VERMILLION TWP C A S T L E R O C K T W P G R E E N VAL E T W P R A V E N N A T W P INVER GROVE HEIGHTS SCIOTA TWP A P P L E V A L L E Y F A R MIN G T O N HASTINGS NININ G E R T W P WATERFORD TWP RANDOLPH TWP 0 21,000 42,00010,500 Feet kk 52 35E 494 35W Sources: Metropolitain Council, MNDOT, MNGEO LEGEND PROJECT SITE (PID 130010002012) TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF FARMINGTON CITY OF FARMINGTON EUREKA TOWNSHIP CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION 220TH ST W220TH ST W 3131 DE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 DE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 225TH ST W225TH ST W DE N T O N A V E DE N T O N A V E CITY OF FARMINGTON CITY OF FARMINGTON EUREKA TOWNSHIP EU R E K A T O W N S H I P CASTLE ROCK TOWNSHIP DAKOTA COUNTY Page 184 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 2 ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ―│í ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ; &P³O ! ! ! !! " " " "" ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ▄5n ^ !F !F ! 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 35 4948000mN 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4935000mN 48 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 9183 492000mE 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91483000mE 92 44.5648° 44.6898° -93.2255°-93.1005° 44.6898° 44.5648°-93.1005°-93.2255° 10 0 0 10 0 0 95 0 925 950 92 5 92 5 1025 900 975 105 0 975 97 5 1025 1025 950 925 9 7 5 100 0 900 1000 9 7 5 97 5 950 950 92 5 9 0 0 975 925 90 0 10 0 0 8 7 5 10 0 0 9 7 5 1025 1050 97 5 950 10 0 0 92 5 1025 975 1000 1 0 2 5 1000 9 5 0 9 2 5 95 0 1025 10 0 0 1050 1025 1050 9 7 5 10 0 0 10 0 0 975 1000 1025 950 975 975 100 0 92 5 9 7 5 900 9 2 5 900 900 10 7 5 1050 1050 1050 1050 1050 1000 1025 1 0 2 5 1 0 2 5 10 2 5 1000 102 5 1000 10 2 5 1000 10 0 0 1000 10 0 0 100 0 1000 10 0 0 1000 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 9 7 5 10 0 0 950 950 95 0 97 5 975 9 7 5 975 97 5 975 975 9 7 5 975 950 97 5 975 975 950 950 950 950 95 0 9 2 5 950 950 950 95 0 950 9 5 0 950 950 92 5 950 950 925 92 5 925 9 2 5 900 900 925 92 5 925 92 5 92 5 92 5 90 0 925 92 5 90 0 925 900 925 90 0 900 90 0 900 90 0 900 900 875 10 0 0 975 95 0 925 9 2 5 9 2 5 925925 900 900 900 900 900 12 24 14 35 24 7 1815 11 20 16 22 34 2 27 1 6 13 9 33 9 19 30 4 26 25 2321 10 14 5 11 15 22 29 16 28 2827 25 26 17 28 16 10 4 21 3 23 9 36 12 13 21 8 7 17 16 19 31 28 32 18 9 29 21 30 8 20 33 T113N R20W T113N R19W T114N R19W T114N R20W Chub Lake E U C LI D PA TH SPRUCE ST 203RDSTW ELM ST 240TH ST W FL A G S T A F F A V E E A S T V I E W AV E CO R D 2 3 EN G L I S H A V E 6T H S T CO RD 70 ERICK S O N P A T H 224TH ST W C O R D 66 BI S C A Y N E A V E 8T H S T UPPER 183RD ST W 206TH STW 13 T H S T EGRET WAY EUREKA AVE GR E E N W OOD AVE 11 T H S T C AMROSEWAY DO V E R D R 187TH S T W 2N D S T UPPER 182N D ST W 180TH ST W W I L LOW TRL D E E R B R O O K E PAT H SHAKESPEARE BLVD 9T H S T CALGARYTRL G A L A X I E A V E EV E NSO NGAVE 198TH ST W 193 R D ST W G E MINI T RL 199TH STW 205TH S TW DE N M A R K A V E 12 T H S T 7T H S T E V E R E S T P A T H C O R D 3 1 ES S E X A V E HICKORYST 250TH ST W E M BE R S A V E FA I R G R E E N A V E 185TH ST W CLAREMO NTDR D U N B U R Y AV E ECHO D R B U TT E R NUTTRL D U L U T H ST MAIN ST 208TH ST W PINE ST 183RD ST W AK I N R D DY L A N D R EMERALD T R L MAPLE ST ENGLEW O O D W A Y 179TH ST EA T O N A V E GLE NBR IDGE A V E 5T H S T OAK ST LOCUST ST LARCH ST 14 T H S T 4T H S T CAB RIL L A W AY 3R D S T MACB E TH C IR 260TH ST W E M B R Y AV E B E A U M ONTAVE CA M B O D I A A V E EVENIN GST A R W A Y 195TH ST W 189THST W CO RD 80 P I LO T KN OB RD UPPER 1 7 8 T H S T DI A M O N D P A T H R D C Y P R E S S D R CE D A R A V E EVE N STOND R EXCALIBURTRL 197TH ST W 264TH ST W 263RD ST W 265TH ST W 255TH ST W 225TH ST W 202ND ST W CO RD 64 190TH ST W CO RD 72 CO RD 78 B E R RINGAVE 247TH ST W 230TH ST W 200 T H S T W 20TH ST W 245TH ST W AirlakeAirport JennrichField Nielsen'sAirport Hall Airport ¬«3 ¬«50 ¬«50 ¬«3 ¬«3 ¬«3 FarmingtonLutheranCemetery SaintMichaelsCemeteryCorinthianCemetery ChubCr South Br Vermillion River North B r C h u b C r Vermillion River Eureka Center FARMINGTON FARM SERVICE AGENCY INTEREST OF MINNESOTA LAKEVILLE Castle Rock Randolph CoatesFarmington MINNESOTA 7.5-MINUTE TOPO, MN 2025 Expressway Local Connector ROAD CLASSIFICATION Ramp 4WD Secondary Hwy Local Road Interstate Route State RouteUS RouteWX./QUADRANGLE LOCATION ADJOINING QUADRANGLES SCALE 1:24 000 CONTOUR SMOOTHNESS = Medium CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000 21KILOMETERS00.51 1 0.5 0 MILES 1 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 FEET U.S. National Grid 100,000 - m Square ID Grid Zone Designation VK 15T GN MN 0°7´2 MILS 0°10´3 MILS UTM GRID AND 2025 MAGNETIC NORTHDECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and 1 000-meter grid: UNIVERSAL TRANSVERSE MERCATOR, ZONE 15T Produced by the United States Geological Survey Data is provided by The National Map (TNM), is the best available at the time of map generation, and includes data content from supporting themes of Elevation, Hydrography, Geographic Names, Boundaries, Transportation, Structures, Land Cover, and Orthoimagery. Refer to associated Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Metadata for additional source data information. This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before entering private lands. Temporal changes may have occurred since these data were collected and some data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Learn About The National Map: https://nationalmap.gov 7.5-MINUTE TOPO QUADRANGLE MINNESOTA - CUSTOM EXTENT 7.5-MINUTE TOPO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Sources: USGS FIGURE 2. USGS QUAD MAP Page 185 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 3 LEGEND PROJECT SITE 40’ LOTS 116 UNITS 50’ LOTS 89 UNITS 55’ LOTS 120 UNITS 65’ LOTS 46 UNITS PARK/OPEN SPACE PIPELINE EASEMENT STORMWATER PONDS FIGURE 3. CONCEPT PLAN 220TH ST W220TH ST W PIP E L I N E E A S E M E N T PIP E L I N E E A S E M E N T DE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 DE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 225TH ST W225TH ST W Pa g e 1 8 6 o f 4 5 4 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 4 LEGEND PROJECT SITE 40’ LOTS 116 UNITS 50’ LOTS 89 UNITS 55’ LOTS 120 UNITS 65’ LOTS 46 UNITS PARK/OPEN SPACE EASEMENT STORMWATER PONDS PHASING PHASE I 79 LOTS PHASE II - IV 291 LOTS PHASE I 37 LOTS PHASE II - IV 130 LOTS PHASE II - IV 161 LOTS PHASE I 42 LOTS FIGURE 4. PROJECT PHASING PIP E L I N E E A S E M E N T PIP E L I N E E A S E M E N T 220TH ST W220TH ST W DE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 DE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 225TH ST W225TH ST W Pa g e 1 8 7 o f 4 5 4 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 5 Source: MNDNR Minnesota Climate Explorer Tool, available at https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/climateexplorer/ FIGURE 5. AVERAGE ANNUAL TEMPERATURE FIGURE 6. PROJECTED AVERAGE ANNUAL TEMPERATURE Page 188 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 6 Source: MNDNR Minnesota Climate Explorer Tool, available at https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/climateexplorer/ FIGURE 7. AVERAGE ANNUAL PRECIPITATION FIGURE 8. PROJECTED AVERAGE ANNUAL PRECIPITATION Page 189 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 7 0 500 1,000250 Feet LEGEND PROJECT SITE MLCCS CLASSIFICATION < 50% IMPERVIOUS > 50% IMPERVIOUS GRASSES AGRICULTURAL LAND WETLAND FOREST WETLAND SHRUBS WETLAND EMERGENT VEGETATION WETLAND OPEN WATER OPEN WATER Source: MNDNR, MNGEO, Metropolitan Council FIGURE 9. MLCCS COVER TYPES 220TH ST W220TH ST WDE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 DE N M A R K A V E / C S A H 7 4 225TH ST W225TH ST W DE N T O N A V E DE N T O N A V E Page 190 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 8 Figure 3.1 Existing Land Use 2017 3-26 FARMIn G ton , MInnesotA - 2040 Co MPRe H ensIVe PLAn Source: City of Farmington 2040 Comprehensive Plan FIGURE 10. CITY OF FARMINGTON - EXISTING LAND USE LEGEND CITY BOUNDARY PROJECT SITE EXISTING LAND USE AGRICULTURE SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED MULTI-FAMILY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK/OPEN SPACE ROW UTILITIES VACANT Page 191 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 9 Source: Eureka Township 2040 Comprehensive Plan FIGURE 11. EUREKA TOWNSHIP - EXISTING LAND USE LEGEND TOWNSHIP BOUNDARY PROJECT SITE LAND USE DESIGNATION AGRICULTURE FARMSTEAD SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL EXTRACTIVE AIRPORT PARK, RECREATIONAL, OR PRESERVE INDUSTRIAL AND UTILITY INSTITUTIONAL RETAIL/OTHER COMMERCIAL UNDEVELOPED WATER/WETLANDS Page 192 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 10 Figure 3.3 2040 Future Land Use 3-31 03 - LA nd u se PLAnSource: City of Farmington 2040 Comprehensive Plan FIGURE 12. CITY OF FARMINGTON - FUTURE LAND USE LEGEND CITY BOUNDARY PROJECT SITE LAND USE DESIGNATION AGRICULTURE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL [1.0 - 3.5 U/A] LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL [3.5 - 6.0 U/A] MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL [6.0 - 12.0 U/A] HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL [12.0 - 40.0 U/A] MIXED-USE (COMM./RES.) [6.0 - 40.0 U/A] MIXED-USE (COMM./IND.) COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC PARK/OPEN SPACE ROW NON-DESIGNATED Page 193 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PA G E 11 Figure 3.4 Anticipated MUSA Staging MUSA Gross Acreage 2020 2030 2040 6,690.94 7010.70 7309.72 3-35 03 - L A ND U SE P L A N Figure 3.4 Anticipated MUSA Staging MUSA Gross Acreage 2020 2030 2040 6,690.94 7010.70 7309.72 3-35 03 - LA nd u se PLAn Source: City of Farmington 2040 Comprehensive Plan FIGURE 13. MUSA STAGING MAP AMENDMENT EXISTING MUSA STAGING PROPOSED MUSA STAGING LEGEND CURRENT CITY BOUNDARY PROJECT SITE MUSA STAGING 2020 MUSA (MET COUNCIL) 2030 PHASE OUTLINE 2040 PHASE OUTLINE ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREAS PARK/OPEN SPACE LEGEND CURRENT CITY BOUNDARY PROJECT SITE MUSA STAGING 2020 MUSA (MET COUNCIL) 2030 PHASE OUTLINE 2040 PHASE OUTLINE ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREAS PARK/OPEN SPACEPa g e 1 9 4 o f 4 5 4 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 12 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 49 4 0 9 0 0 49 4 1 0 0 0 49 4 1 1 0 0 49 4 1 2 0 0 49 4 1 3 0 0 49 4 1 4 0 0 49 4 1 5 0 0 49 4 1 6 0 0 49 4 1 7 0 0 49 4 1 8 0 0 49 4 1 9 0 0 49 4 2 0 0 0 49 4 2 1 0 0 49 4 0 9 0 0 49 4 1 0 0 0 49 4 1 1 0 0 49 4 1 2 0 0 49 4 1 3 0 0 49 4 1 4 0 0 49 4 1 5 0 0 49 4 1 6 0 0 49 4 1 7 0 0 49 4 1 8 0 0 49 4 1 9 0 0 49 4 2 0 0 0 49 4 2 1 0 0 486700 486800 486900 487000 487100 487200 487300 487400 487500 487600 486700 486800 486900 487000 487100 487200 487300 487400 487500 487600 44° 37' 58'' N 93 ° 1 0 ' 5 ' ' W 44° 37' 58'' N 93 ° 9 ' 2 1 ' ' W 44° 37' 16'' N 93 ° 1 0 ' 5 ' ' W 44° 37' 16'' N 93 ° 9 ' 2 1 ' ' W N Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 300 600 1200 1800Feet 0 50 100 200 300Meters Map Scale: 1:6,280 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. SSooiill MMaapp mmaayy nnoott bbee vvaalliidd aatt tthhiiss ssccaallee.. 220th St W220th St W 225th St W225th St W 129129252252 De n m a r k A v e De n m a r k A v e Source: NRCS Web Soil Survey FIGURE 14. NRCS SOIL SURVEY LEGEND PROJECT SITE SOIL MAP UNIT POLYGONS SPECIAL LINE FEATURES Page 195 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 13 Source: NRCS Web Soil Survey Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 39A Wadena loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 16.8 10.6% 39B Wadena loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 1.3 0.8% 129 Cylinder loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.1 0.0% 208 Kato silty clay loam 0.6 0.4% 252 Marshan silty clay loam 9.2 5.8% 411A Waukegan silt loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 111.4 70.4% 411B Waukegan silt loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 16.3 10.3% 415B Kanaranzi loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2.6 1.6% Totals for Area of Interest 158.3 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit Custom Soil Resource Report 11 FIGURE 14. NRCS SOIL SURVEY (CONT.) Page 196 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 14 LEGEND PROJECT SITE 1-MILE STUDY AREA BUFFER DNR PUBLIC WATER BASIN PROJECT SITE DELINEATED WETLANDS DNR PUBLIC WATER COURSE NHD FLOWLINE IMPAIRED STREAMS 0 0.5 10.25 Miles FIGURE 15. SURFACE WATER RESOURCES Sources: Metropolitan Council, MNDNR, USGS, MNGEO, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Page 197 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 15 LEGEND PROJECT SITE 1/4-MILE STUDY AREA BUFFER WELLS WITHIN 1/4-MILE OF STUDY AREA WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) 0 500 1,000250 Feet FIGURE 16. GROUNDWATER RESOURCES Source: Metropolitan Council, MN Department Of Health, MNGEO Page 198 of 454 VERMILLION RESERVE EAW FARMINGTON, MN APPENDIX A PAGE 16 910 910920 920 910 9 2 0 9 2 0 910 920 920 9 2 0 9 2 0 920910910 910 910 910 910 910 910 9 2 0910 910 910 920 9 1 0 9 1 0 9 2 0 9 1 0 910 910 9 2 0 9 2 0 910 910 9 1 0 920 9 1 0 9 1 0 910 910 920 910 0 500 1,000250 Feet LEGEND PROJECT SITE VERMILLION RIVER SHORELAND OVERLAY SOUTH CREEK SUB-WATERSHED DISTRICT UPPER MAINSTREAM SUB-WATERSHED DISTRICT SOUTH BRANCH SUB-WATERSHED DISTRICT FIGURE 17. VERMILLION RIVER SUBWATERSHEDS Page 199 of 454 APPENDIX B Agency Reviews Page 200 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE-2025-00907 Page 1 of 5 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological & Water Resources 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 February 12, 2026 Jennifer Haskamp Swanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC RE: Natural Heritage Review of the proposed Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington, T113N R19W Section 6, T113N R20W Section 1, T114N R19W Section 1, T114N R20W Section 36; Dakota County Dear Jennifer Haskamp, For all correspondence regarding the Natural Heritage Review of this project please include the project ID MCE- 2025-00907 in the email subject line. As requested, the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System has been reviewed to determine if the proposed project has the potential to impact any rare species or other significant natural features. Based on the project details provided with the request, the following rare features may be impacted by the proposed project: State-listed Species • Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii), a state-listed threatened species, have been documented in the vicinity of the proposed project. Blanding’s turtles use upland areas up to and over a mile distant from wetlands, waterbodies, and watercourses. Uplands are used for nesting, basking, periods of dormancy, and traveling between wetlands. Factors believed to contribute to the decline of this species include collisions with vehicles, wetland drainage and degradation, and the development of upland habitat. Any added mortality can be detrimental to populations of Blanding’s turtles, as these turtles have a low reproduction rate that depends upon a high survival rate to maintain population levels. The proposed project has the potential to impact this rare turtle through direct fatalities and habitat disturbance/destruction. Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of threatened or endangered species without a permit. As such, please contact Review.NHIS@state.mn.us to confirm that the following measures will be implemented: o Avoid wetland and aquatic impacts during overwintering season, between September 15 and April 15, if the area is suitable for overwintering. Wetlands and aquatic habitats that freeze solid to the bed (no liquid water) are not suitable overwintering habitat. However, Blanding’s turtles will overwinter in wetlands and aquatic habitat where ice has closed over the water’s surface. o Limit erosion and sediment control to wildlife friendly erosion control. Page 201 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE-2025-00907 Page 2 of 5 o Check bare ground, including trenches, holes, or depressions, within construction areas for turtles before the use of heavy equipment or any ground disturbance. o The Blanding’s turtle flyer must be given to all contractors working in the area. o Report any sightings using the DNR Plant and Animal Observation Form. o If turtles are in imminent danger, move them by hand out of harm’s way; otherwise, they are to be left undisturbed. Directions on how to move turtles safely can be found at Helping Turtles Across the Road. If the above measures are not feasible, please contact Review.NHIS@state.mn.us as a project-specific avoidance plan will likely be needed to demonstrate avoidance. Additional Blanding’s turtle avoidance measures may include, but are not limited to, the following recommendations: o Recommendations from List 1 of the Blanding’s turtle fact sheet. If greater protection for turtles is desired, implement recommendations from List 2. o Avoid hydro-mulch products that contain any materials with synthetic (plastic) fiber additives, as the fibers can re-suspend and flow into waterbodies. o Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below grade. If curbs must be used, install wildlife friendly curbs to allow turtles to leave the road. Stormwater inlets should be designed to prevent turtles from falling into the storm sewer. For an example, reference “Curb Design and Small Animals” (Chapter 1, P. 24) in Best Practices Manual | Minnesota DNR. • The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) tracks bat roost trees and hibernacula plus some acoustic data, but this information is not exhaustive. Even if there are no bat records listed nearby, all of Minnesota’s bats, including the federally endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), can be found throughout Minnesota. During the active season (approximately April-November) bats roost underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Tree removal can negatively impact bats by destroying roosting habitat, especially during the pup rearing season when females are forming maternity roosting colonies and the pups cannot yet fly. To minimize these impacts, the DNR recommends that tree removal be avoided from June 1 through August 15. • The area of interest overlaps with a U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Rusty Patched Bumble Bee High Potential Zone. The rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) is federally listed as endangered and is anticipated to be listed as an endangered species in Minnesota in 2026. This species is likely to be present in suitable habitat (shrub/tree cover and the surrounding 100 feet of vegetation) within High Potential Zones and may be impacted by a variety of land management activities including, but not limited to, prescribed fire, tree-removal, haying, grazing, herbicide use, pesticide use, land-clearing, soil disturbance or compaction, or use of non-native bees. Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of threatened or endangered species without a permit. If your project will impact more than two acres of suitable habitat within the high potential zone, avoidance measures or a permit to take may be needed when the endangered status becomes effective. Updates to the status of this species will be posted at Endangered and Threatened Species Permits. Page 202 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE-2025-00907 Page 3 of 5 • Please visit the DNR Rare Species Guide for more information on the habitat use of state-listed species and recommended measures to avoid or minimize impacts. Federally Protected Species • To ensure compliance with federal law, please conduct a federal regulatory review using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool. Environmental Review and Permitting • The Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) should address whether the proposed project has the potential to adversely affect the above rare features and, if so, it should identify specific measures that will be taken to avoid or minimize disturbance. Sufficient information should be provided so the DNR can determine whether a permit to take will be needed for any of the above protected species. • Please include a copy of this letter and the MCE-generated Final Project Report in any state or local license or permit application. Please note that measures to avoid or minimize disturbance to the above rare features may be included as restrictions or conditions in any required permits or licenses. The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Minnesota’s rare natural features, is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's native plant communities, rare species, and other rare features. However, the NHIS is not an exhaustive inventory and does not contain the locations of all rare features in the state. Therefore, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. If additional information becomes available regarding rare features in the vicinity of the project, further review may be necessary. For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location and project description provided with the request. If project details change or the project has not occurred within one year, please resubmit the project for review within one year of initiating project activities. Resubmit by selecting Clone Project as Draft on the project page in MCE. The Natural Heritage Review does not constitute project approval by the Department of Natural Resources. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential impacts to these rare features. Visit Natural Heritage Review for additional information regarding this process, survey guidance, and other related information. For information on the environmental review process or other natural resource concerns, please contact your DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist. Page 203 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE-2025-00907 Page 4 of 5 Thank you for consulting us on this matter and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, James Drake Natural Heritage Review Specialist james.f.drake@state.mn.us Cc: Melissa Collins Page 204 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE-2025-00907 Page 5 of 5 For more project details, see the MCE-generated Final Project Report, available on the MCE project page. Page 205 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE #: 2025-00907 Page 1 of 5 Formal Natural Heritage Review - Cover Page See next page for results of review. A draft watermark means the project details have not been finalized and the results are not official. Project Name: Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington Project Proposer: Lennar Homes Project Type: Development, Residential Project Type Activities: Wetland impacts (e.g., dewatering, tiling, drainage, discharge, excavation, fill, runoff, sedimentation, changes in hydrology);Waterbody or watercourse impacts (e.g., dewatering, discharge, excavation, fill, runoff, sedimentation, changes in hydrology));Groundwater Impacts (e.g., contamination, dewatering, change in hydrology, potential for aquifer breach);Structure Removal or Bridge Removal;Grading TRS: T113 R19 S6, T113 R20 S1, T114 R19 S31, T114 R20 S36 County(s): Dakota DNR Admin Region(s): Central Reason Requested: State EAW Project Description: Lennar Homes proposes to develop an estimated 371 single-family residential homes on approximately 158.3 acres previously used for agricultural production. ... Existing Land Uses: The existing land use is agricultural production and a rural residence. Landcover / Habitat Impacted: Existing land previously disturbed for agriculture will be impacted by the project. This includes cropland, and short and tall grasses, and wetlands. Waterbodies Affected: The project is not developed to the point to know for certain, but dewatering is possible. Wetland disturbance is also possible. Groundwater Resources Affected: The project will increase the impervious surface cover, leading to more runoff and change in runoff (more chemicals and oils possible in urban runoff). Previous Natural Heritage Review: No Previous Habitat Assessments / Surveys: No SUMMARY OF AUTOMATED RESULTS Category Results Response By Category Project Details No Comments No Further Review Required Ecologically Significant Area No Comments No Further Review Required State-Listed Endangered or Threatened Species Needs Further Review State-protected Species - Needs Further Review State-Listed Species of Special Concern No Comments No Further Review Required 11/11/2025 11:05 AM Page 206 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE #: 2025-00907 Page 2 of 5 Category Results Response By Category Federally Listed Species Comments RPBB High Potential Zone 11/11/2025 11:05 AM Page 207 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE #: 2025-00907 Page 3 of 5 November 11, 2025 Project Name: Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington Project Proposer: Lennar Homes Project Type: Development, Residential Project ID: MCE #2025-00907 AUTOMATED RESULTS: FURTHER REVIEW IS NEEDED As requested, the above project has undergone an automated review for potential impacts to rare features. Based on this review, one or more rare features may be impacted by the proposed project and further review by the Natural Heritage Review Team is needed. You will receive a separate notification email when the review process is complete and the Natural Heritage Review letter has been posted. Please refer to the table on the cover page of this report for a summary of potential impacts to rare features. For additional information or planning purposes, use the Explore Page in Minnesota Conservation Explorer to view the potentially impacted rare features or to create a Conservation Planning Report for the proposed project. If you have additional information to help resolve the potential impacts listed in the summary results, please attach related project documentation in the Edit Details tab of the Project page. Relevant information includes, but is not limited to, additional project details, completed habitat assessments, or survey results. This additional information will be considered during the project review. 11/11/2025 11:05 AM Page 208 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE #: 2025-00907 Page 4 of 5 11/11/2025 11:05 AM Page 209 of 454 Vermillion Reserve EAW Farmington MCE #: 2025-00907 Page 5 of 5 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 11/11/2025 11:05 AM Page 210 of 454 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2026-0024932 Project Name: Vermillion Reserve Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: This response has been generated by the Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) system to provide information on natural resources that could be affected by your project. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) provides this response under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668d), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). Threatened and Endangered Species The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirement for obtaining a Technical Assistance Letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. Consultation Technical Assistance Please refer to refer to our Section 7 website for guidance and technical assistance, including step-by-step instructions for making effects determinations for each species that might be present and for specific guidance on the following types of projects: projects in developed areas, HUD, CDBG, EDA, USDA Rural Development projects, pipelines, buried utilities, telecommunications, and requests for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. Page 211 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 2 of 15 1. 2. We recommend running the project (if it qualifies) through our Minnesota-Wisconsin Federal Endangered Species Determination Key (Minnesota-Wisconsin ("D-key")). A demonstration video showing how-to access and use the determination key is available. Please note that the Minnesota-Wisconsin D-key is the third option of 3 available d-keys. D-keys are tools to help Federal agencies and other project proponents determine if their proposed action has the potential to adversely affect federally listed species and designated critical habitat. The Minnesota-Wisconsin D-key includes a structured set of questions that assists a project proponent in determining whether a proposed project qualifies for a certain predetermined consultation outcome for all federally listed species found in Minnesota and Wisconsin (except for the northern long-eared bat- see below), which includes determinations of “no effect” or “may affect, not likely to adversely affect." In each case, the Service has compiled and analyzed the best available information on the species’ biology and the impacts of certain activities to support these determinations. If your completed d-key output letter shows a "No Effect" (NE) determination for all listed species, print your IPaC output letter for your files to document your compliance with the Endangered Species Act. For Federal projects with a “Not Likely to Adversely Affect” (NLAA) determination, our concurrence becomes valid if you do not hear otherwise from us after a 30-day review period, as indicated in your letter. If your d-key output letter indicates additional coordination with the Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office is necessary (i.e., you get a “May Affect” determination), you will be provided additional guidance on contacting the Service to continue ESA coordination outside of the key; ESA compliance cannot be concluded using the key for “May Affect” determinations unless otherwise indicated in your output letter. Note: Once you obtain your official species list, you are not required to continue in IPaC with d-keys, although in most cases these tools should expedite your review. If you choose to make an effects determination on your own, you may do so. If the project is a Federal Action, you may want to review our section 7 step-by-step instructions before making your determinations. Using the IPaC Official Species List to Make No Effect and May Affect Determinations for Listed Species If IPaC returns a result of “There are no listed species found within the vicinity of the project,” then project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on any federally listed species under Service jurisdiction. Concurrence from the Service is not required for no effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. If IPaC returns one or more federally listed, proposed, or candidate species as potentially present in the action area of the proposed project – other than bats (see below) – then project proponents must determine if proposed activities will have no effect on or may affect those species. For assistance in determining if suitable habitat for listed, candidate, or proposed species occurs within your project area or if species may be affected by project activities, you can obtain Life History Information for Listed and Candidate Species on our office website. If no impacts will occur to a species on the IPaC species list (e.g., there is no habitat present in the project area), the appropriate determination is no effect. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC species list report for your records. Page 212 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 3 of 15 3. ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Should you determine that project activities may affect any federally listed, please contact our office for further coordination. Letters with requests for consultation or correspondence about your project should include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header. Electronic submission is preferred. Northern Long-Eared Bats Northern long-eared bats occur throughout Minnesota and Wisconsin and the information below may help in determining if your project may affect these species. Suitable summer habitat for northern long-eared bats consists of a wide variety of forested/wooded habitats where they roost, forage, and travel and may also include some adjacent and interspersed non-forested habitats such as emergent wetlands and adjacent edges of agricultural fields, old fields and pastures. This includes forests and woodlots containing potential roosts (i.e., live trees and/or snags ≥3 inches dbh for northern long- eared bat that have exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices, and/or hollows), as well as linear features such as fencerows, riparian forests, and other wooded corridors. These wooded areas may be dense or loose aggregates of trees with variable amounts of canopy closure. Individual trees may be considered suitable habitat when they exhibit the characteristics of a potential roost tree and are located within 1,000 feet (305 meters) of forested/wooded habitat. Northern long-eared bats have also been observed roosting in human-made structures, such as buildings, barns, bridges, and bat houses; therefore, these structures should also be considered potential summer habitat and evaluated for use by bats. If your project will impact caves or mines or will involve clearing forest or woodland habitat containing suitable roosting habitat, northern long-eared bats could be affected. For bat activity dates, please review Appendix L in the Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern Long- Eared Bat Survey Guidelines. Examples of unsuitable habitat include: Individual trees that are greater than 1,000 feet from forested or wooded areas, Trees found in highly developed urban areas (e.g., street trees, downtown areas), A pure stand of less than 3-inch dbh trees that are not mixed with larger trees, and A monoculture stand of shrubby vegetation with no potential roost trees. If IPaC returns a result that northern long-eared bats are potentially present in the action area of the proposed project, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities may affect this species IF one or more of the following activities are proposed: Clearing or disturbing suitable roosting habitat, as defined above, at any time of year, Any activity in or near the entrance to a cave or mine, Mining, deep excavation, or underground work within 0.25 miles of a cave or mine, Construction of one or more wind turbines, or Demolition or reconstruction of human-made structures that are known to be used by bats based on observations of roosting bats, bats emerging at dusk, or guano deposits or stains. If none of the above activities are proposed, project proponents can conclude the proposed activities will have no effect on the northern long-eared bat. Concurrence from the Service is not required for No Effect determinations. No further consultation or coordination is required. Attach this letter to the dated IPaC Page 213 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 4 of 15 species list report for your records. If any of the above activities are proposed, and the northern long-eared bat appears on the user’s species list, the federal project user will be directed to either the northern long-eared bat and tricolored bat range-wide D- key or the Federal Highways Administration, Federal Railways Administration, and Federal Transit Administration Indiana bat/Northern long-eared bat D-key, depending on the type of project and federal agency involvement. Similar to the Minnesota-Wisconsin D-key, these d-keys helps to determine if prohibited take might occur and, if not, will generate an automated verification letter. Additional information about available tools can be found on the Service’s northern long-eared bat website. Whooping Crane Whooping crane is designated as a non-essential experimental population in Wisconsin and consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act is only required if project activities will occur within a National Wildlife Refuge or National Park. If project activities are proposed on lands outside of a National Wildlife Refuge or National Park, then you are not required to consult. For additional information on this designation and consultation requirements, please review “Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Whooping Cranes in the Eastern United States.” Other Trust Resources and Activities Bald and Golden Eagles - Although the bald eagle has been removed from the endangered species list, this species and the golden eagle are protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to survey the area for any migratory bird nests. If there is an eagle nest on-site while work is on-going, eagles may be disturbed. We recommend avoiding and minimizing disturbance to eagles whenever practicable. If you cannot avoid eagle disturbance, you may seek a permit. A nest take permit is always required for removal, relocation, or obstruction of an eagle nest. For communication and wind energy projects, please refer to additional guidelines below. Migratory Birds - The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs, parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Service. The Service has the responsibility under the MBTA to proactively prevent the mortality of migratory birds whenever possible and we encourage implementation of recommendations that minimize potential impacts to migratory birds. Such measures include clearing forested habitat outside the nesting season (generally March 1 to August 31) or conducting nest surveys prior to clearing to avoid injury to eggs or nestlings. Communication Towers - Construction of new communications towers (including radio, television, cellular, and microwave) creates a potentially significant impact on migratory birds, especially some 350 species of night-migrating birds. However, the Service has developed voluntary guidelines for minimizing impacts. Transmission Lines - Migratory birds, especially large species with long wingspans, heavy bodies, and poor maneuverability can also collide with power lines. In addition, mortality can occur when birds, particularly hawks, eagles, kites, falcons, and owls, attempt to perch on uninsulated or unguarded power poles. To minimize these risks, please refer to guidelines developed by the Avian Power Line Interaction Committee and the Service. Implementation of these measures is especially important along sections of lines adjacent to wetlands or other areas that support large numbers of raptors and migratory birds. Page 214 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 5 of 15 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Wind Energy - To minimize impacts to migratory birds and bats, wind energy projects should follow the Service’s Wind Energy Guidelines. In addition, please refer to the Service's Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, which provides guidance for conserving bald and golden eagles in the course of siting, constructing, and operating wind energy facilities. State Department of Natural Resources Coordination While it is not required for your Federal section 7 consultation, please note that additional state endangered or threatened species may also have the potential to be impacted. Please contact the Minnesota or Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for information on state listed species that may be present in your proposed project area. Minnesota Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: Review.NHIS@state.mn.us Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Endangered Resources Review Homepage Email: DNRERReview@wi.gov We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. Please feel free to contact our office with questions or for additional information. Attachment(s): Official Species List USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries Bald & Golden Eagles Migratory Birds Wetlands OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 (952) 858-0793 Page 215 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 6 of 15 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Code:2026-0024932 Project Name:Vermillion Reserve Project Type:Residential Construction Project Description:Lennar Homes proposes to develop an estimated 370 single-family residential homes on approximately 158.3 acres previously used for agricultural production. Project Location: The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@44.628057749999996,-93.16203312937013,14z Counties:Dakota County, Minnesota Page 216 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 7 of 15 1. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. 1 Page 217 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 8 of 15 MAMMALS NAME STATUS Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 Proposed Endangered BIRDS NAME STATUS Whooping Crane Grus americana Population: U.S.A. (AL, AR, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, MI, MN, MS, MO, NC, NM, OH, SC, TN, UT, VA, WI, WV, western half of WY) No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/758 Experimental Population, Non- Essential INSECTS NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 Proposed Threatened Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9383 General project design guidelines: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/project/P4B7U2HTQ5BXRH2WLAOKBD4C44/documents/ generated/9225.pdf Endangered Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/12017 Proposed Threatened CRITICAL HABITATS THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES. Page 218 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 9 of 15 1. 2. 3. USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS AND FISH HATCHERIES Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES Bald and Golden Eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) . Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to Bald or Golden Eagles, or their habitats, should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures, as described in the various links on this page. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) There are Bald Eagles and/or Golden Eagles in your project area. Measures for Proactively Minimizing Eagle Impacts For information on how to best avoid and minimize disturbance to nesting bald eagles, please review the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. You may employ the timing and activity-specific distance recommendations in this document when designing your project/ activity to avoid and minimize eagle impacts. For bald eagle information specific to Alaska, please refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity. The FWS does not currently have guidelines for avoiding and minimizing disturbance to nesting Golden Eagles. For site-specific recommendations regarding nesting Golden Eagles, please consult with the appropriate Regional Migratory Bird Office or Ecological Services Field Office. If disturbance or take of eagles cannot be avoided, an incidental take permit may be available to authorize any take that results from, but is not the purpose of, an otherwise lawful activity. For assistance making this determination for Bald Eagles, visit the Do I Need A Permit Tool. For assistance making this determination for golden eagles, please consult with the appropriate Regional Migratory Bird Office or Ecological Services Field Office. Ensure Your Eagle List is Accurate and Complete If your project area is in a poorly surveyed area in IPaC, your list may not be complete and you may need to rely on other resources to determine what species may be present (e.g. your local FWS field office, state surveys, your own surveys). Please review the Supplemental Information 2 1 Page 219 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 10 of 15 no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence on Migratory Birds and Eagles, to help you properly interpret the report for your specified location, including determining if there is sufficient data to ensure your list is accurate. For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to bald or golden eagles on your list, see the "Probability of Presence Summary" below to see when these bald or golden eagles are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Breeds Oct 15 to Aug 31 PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during that week of the year. Breeding Season () Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. Survey Effort () Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle Page 220 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 11 of 15 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ 1. 2. 3. Non-BCC Vulnerable Additional information can be found using the following links: Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide avoidance and minimization measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/ default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/ media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur- project-action MIGRATORY BIRDS The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the "Probability of Presence Summary" below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626 Breeds Oct 15 to Aug 31 Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406 Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25 1 Page 221 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 12 of 15 NAME BREEDING SEASON Grasshopper Sparrow Ammodramus savannarum perpallidus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8329 Breeds Jun 1 to Aug 20 Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9439 Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9398 Breeds May 10 to Sep 10 Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9478 Breeds elsewhere Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9603 Breeds elsewhere PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence () Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during that week of the year. Breeding Season () Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. Survey Effort () Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. No Data () A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. Page 222 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 13 of 15 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Bald Eagle Non-BCC Vulnerable Chimney Swift BCC Rangewide (CON) Grasshopper Sparrow BCC - BCR Prothonotary Warbler BCC Rangewide (CON) Red-headed Woodpecker BCC Rangewide (CON) Rusty Blackbird BCC - BCR Semipalmated Sandpiper BCC - BCR Additional information can be found using the following links: Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds Nationwide avoidance and minimization measures for birds Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/ media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur- project-action WETLANDS Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes. For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District. Page 223 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 14 of 15 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site. FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND PEM1A PEM1C PEM1Af FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND PFO1A RIVERINE R2UBH Page 224 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 01/16/2026 17:35:25 UTC 15 of 15 IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency:Private Entity Name:Kimberly Zlimen Address:550 Vandalia Street Address Line 2:Suite 205 City:St. Paul State:MN Zip:55114 Email kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com Phone:6123967618 Page 225 of 454 01/16/2026 16:55:45 UTC United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project code: 2026-0024932 Project Name: Vermillion Reserve Subject:Technical Assistance letter for 'Vermillion Reserve' for specified threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location consistent with the Minnesota-Wisconsin Endangered Species Determination Key (Minnesota- Wisconsin DKey). Dear Kimberly Zlimen: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received on January 16, 2026 your effect determination(s) for the 'Vermillion Reserve' (Action) using the Minnesota-Wisconsin DKey within the Service's Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system. The Service developed this system in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C 1531 et seq.). Based on your responses to the Service’s Minnesota-Wisconsin DKey, you made the following effect determination(s) for the proposed Action: Species Listing Status Determination Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus)Proposed Threatened No effect Whooping Crane (Grus americana)Experimental Population, Non- Essential No effect Determination Information Thank you for informing the Service of your “No Effect” determination(s). No further coordination is necessary for the species you determined will not be affected by the Action. Additional Information Sufficient project details: Please provide sufficient project details on your project homepage in IPaC (Define Project, Project Description) to support your conclusions. Failure to disclose important aspects of your project that would influence the outcome of your effects determinations may negate your determinations and invalidate this letter. If you have site-specific information that leads you to believe a different determination is more appropriate for your Page 226 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175424016 01/16/2026 16:55:45 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/09/2026 2 of 7 ▪ ▪ ▪ project than what the Dkey concludes, you can and should proceed based on the best available information. Future project changes: The Service recommends that you contact the Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office or re-evaluate the project in IPaC if: 1) the scope or location of the proposed Action is changed; 2) new information reveals that the action may affect federally listed species or federally designated critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; 3) the Action is modified in a manner that causes effects to listed species or designated critical habitat; or 4) a new species is listed or critical habitat designated. If any of the above conditions occurs, additional consultation with the Service should take place before project changes are final or resources committed. Species-specific information Bald and Golden Eagles: Bald eagles, golden eagles, and their nests are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (54 Stat. 250, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 668a-d) (Eagle Act). The Eagle Act prohibits, except when authorized by an Eagle Act permit, the “taking” of bald and golden eagles and defines “take” as “pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb.” The Eagle Act’s implementing regulations define disturb as “… to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, (1) injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior.” If you observe a bald eagle nest in the vicinity of your proposed project, you should follow the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (May 2007). For more information on eagles and conducting activities in the vicinity of an eagle nest, please visit our regional eagle website or contact Margaret at Margaret_Martin@fws.gov. If the Action may affect bald or golden eagles, additional coordination with the Service under the Eagle Act may be required. Additional Species Requiring Review In addition to the species described above, the following species or critical habitats may also occur in your project area and are not covered by this conclusion: Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis Endangered Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis Proposed Threatened Coordination with the Service is not complete if additional coordination is advised above for any species. Page 227 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175424016 01/16/2026 16:55:45 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/09/2026 3 of 7 Action Description You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action. 1. Name Vermillion Reserve 2. Description The following description was provided for the project 'Vermillion Reserve': Lennar Homes proposes to develop an estimated 370 single-family residential homes on approximately 158.3 acres previously used for agricultural production. The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@44.628057749999996,-93.16203312937013,14z Page 228 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175424016 01/16/2026 16:55:45 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/09/2026 4 of 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. QUALIFICATION INTERVIEW This determination key is intended to assist the user in evaluating the effects of their actions on Federally listed species in Minnesota and Wisconsin. It does not cover other prohibited activities under the Endangered Species Act (e.g., for wildlife: import/export, Interstate or foreign commerce, possession of illegally taken wildlife, etc.; for plants: import/export, reduce to possession, malicious destruction on Federal lands, commercial sale, etc.) or other statutes. Additionally, this key DOES NOT cover wind development, purposeful take (e.g., for research or surveys), communication towers that have guy wires or are over 450 feet in height, aerial or other large-scale application of any chemical (such as insecticide or herbicide), and approval of long-term permits or plans (e.g., FERC licenses, HCP's). Click YES to acknowledge that you must consider other prohibitions of the ESA or other statutes outside of this determination key. Yes Is the action being funded, authorized, or carried out by a Federal agency? No Is the action being conducted by or on behalf of a Federally recognized Tribe? No Does the action involve the installation or operation of wind turbines? No Does the action involve purposeful take of a listed animal? No Does the action involve a new communications tower? No Does the activity involve aerial or other large-scale application of ANY chemical, including pesticides (insecticide, herbicide, fungicide, rodenticide, etc)? No Will your action permanently affect local hydrology? Yes Page 229 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175424016 01/16/2026 16:55:45 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/09/2026 5 of 7 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Does your project have the potential to impact the riparian zone or indirectly impact a stream/river (e.g., cut and fill; horizontal directional drilling; construction; vegetation removal; pesticide or fertilizer application; discharge; runoff of sediment or pollutants; increase in erosion, etc.)? Note: Consider all potential effects of the action, including those that may happen later in time and outside and downstream of the immediate area involved in the action. Endangered Species Act regulation defines "effects of the action" to include all consequences to listed species or critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action if it would not occur but for the proposed action and it is reasonably certain to occur. Effects of the action may occur later in time and may include consequences occurring outside the immediate area involved in the action. (50 CFR 402.02). No Will your action disturb the ground or existing vegetation? Note: This includes any off-road vehicle access, soil compaction (enough to collapse a rodent burrow), digging, seismic survey, directional drilling, heavy equipment, grading, trenching, placement of fill, pesticide application (herbicide, fungicide), vegetation management (including removal or maintenance using equipment or prescribed fire), cultivation, development, etc. Yes Will your action include spraying insecticides? No Does your action area occur entirely within an already developed area? Note: Already developed areas are already paved, covered by existing structures, manicured lawns, industrial sites, or cultivated cropland, AND do not contain trees that could be roosting habitat. Be aware that listed species may occur in areas with natural, or semi-natural, vegetation immediately adjacent to existing utilities (e.g. roadways, railways) or within utility rights-of-way such as overhead transmission line corridors, and can utilize suitable trees, bridges, or culverts for roosting even in urban dominated landscapes (so these are not considered "already developed areas" for the purposes of this question). If unsure, select NO.. No [Hidden Semantic] Does the action area intersect the monarch butterfly species list area? Automatically answered Yes Page 230 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175424016 01/16/2026 16:55:45 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/09/2026 6 of 7 14.Under the ESA, monarchs remain warranted but precluded by listing actions of higher priority. The monarch is a candidate for listing at this time. The Endangered Species Act does not establish protections or consultation requirements for candidate species. Some Federal and State agencies may have policy requirements to consider candidate species in planning. We encourage implementing measures that will remove or reduce threats to these species and possibly make listing unnecessary. If your project will have no effect on monarch butterflies (for example, if your project won't affect their habitat or individuals), then you can make a "no effect" determination for this project. Are you making a "no effect" determination for monarch? No Page 231 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175424016 01/16/2026 16:55:45 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/09/2026 7 of 7 IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency:Private Entity Name:Kimberly Zlimen Address:550 Vandalia Street Address Line 2:Suite 205 City:St. Paul State:MN Zip:55114 Email kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com Phone:6123967618 Page 232 of 454 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project code: 2026-0024932 Project Name: Vermillion Reserve Federal Nexus: no Federal Action Agency (if applicable): Subject:Technical assistance for 'Vermillion Reserve' Dear Kimberly Zlimen: This letter records your determination using the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on January 16, 2026, for 'Vermillion Reserve' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned Project Code 2026-0024932 and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number. Please carefully review this letter. Your Endangered Species Act (Act) requirements are not complete. Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC The Service developed the IPaC system and associated species’ determination keys in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and based on a standing analysis. All information submitted by the Project proponent into IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project. Failure to accurately represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the Northern Long-eared Bat and Tricolored Bat Range-wide Determination Key (Dkey), invalidates this letter. Determination for the Northern Long-Eared Bat and Tricolored Bat Based on your IPaC submission and a standing analysis completed by the Service, you determined the proposed Project will have the following effect determinations: Species Listing Status Determination Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus)Proposed Endangered May affect Page 233 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 2 of 11 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Federal agencies must consult with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when an action may affect a listed species. Tricolored bat is proposed for listing as endangered under the ESA, but not yet listed. For actions that may affect a proposed species, agencies cannot consult, but they can confer under the authority of section 7(a) (4) of the ESA. Such conferences can follow the procedures for a consultation and be adopted as such if and when the proposed species is listed. Should the tricolored bat be listed, agencies must review projects that are not yet complete, or projects with ongoing effects within the tricolored bat range that previously received a NE or NLAA determination from the key to confirm that the determination is still accurate. Projects that receive a may affect determination for tricolored bat through the key, should contact the appropriate Ecological Services Field Office if they want to conference on this species. Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area The IPaC-assisted determination key for the northern long-eared bat and tricolored bat does not apply to the following ESA-protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area: Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Proposed Threatened Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Bombus affinis Endangered Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis Proposed Threatened Whooping Crane Grus americana Experimental Population, Non-Essential You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may cause prohibited take of the species listed above. Conclusion Further coordination with the Service is voluntary for those species with a determination of “May Affect.” A “May Affect” determination in this key indicates that the project, as entered, is not consistent with the questions in the key. Not all projects that reach a “May Affect” determination are anticipated to result in adverse impacts to listed species. Through the technical assistance process, the Service might be able to provide information that either indicates incidental take is not reasonably certain to occur, or the Service might be able to provide recommendations that enable the project to be conducted in a way that avoids the likelihood of incidentally taking listed bats. Please contact our Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office for more information. The Service has developed interim voluntary guidance for non- federal actions involving forest habitat modification that may affect the northern long-eared bat. Review the guidance posted here for more information for NLEB: https://www.fws.gov/species/ northern-long-eared-bat-myotis-septentrionalis and TCB: https://www.fws.gov/species/ tricolored-bat-perimyotis-subflavus Page 234 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 3 of 11 Action Description You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action. 1. Name Vermillion Reserve 2. Description The following description was provided for the project 'Vermillion Reserve': Lennar Homes proposes to develop an estimated 370 single-family residential homes on approximately 158.3 acres previously used for agricultural production. The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@44.628057749999996,-93.16203312937013,14z Page 235 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 4 of 11 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. DETERMINATION KEY RESULT Based on the answers provided, the proposed Action is consistent with a determination of “may affect” for a least one species covered by this determination key. QUALIFICATION INTERVIEW Does the proposed project include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, intentional take of listed bats or any other listed species? Note: Intentional take is defined as take that is the intended result of a project. Intentional take could refer to research, direct species management, surveys, and/or studies that include intentional handling/encountering, harassment, collection, or capturing of any individual of a federally listed threatened, endangered or proposed species? No Is the action area wholly within Zone 2 of the year-round active area for northern long- eared bat and/or tricolored bat? Automatically answered No Does the action area intersect Zone 1 of the year-round active area for northern long-eared bat and/or tricolored bat? Automatically answered No Does any component of the action involve leasing, construction or operation of wind turbines? Answer 'yes' if the activities considered are conducted with the intention of gathering survey information to inform the leasing, construction, or operation of wind turbines. No Is the proposed action authorized, permitted, licensed, funded, or being carried out by a Federal agency in whole or in part? Note for projects in Pennsylvania: Projects requiring authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act would be considered as having a federal nexus. Since the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has issued the Pennsylvania State Programmatic General Permit (PASPGP), which may be verified by the PA Department of Environmental Protection or certain Conservation Districts, the need to receive a Corps authorization to perform the work under the PASPGP serves as a federal nexus. As such, if proposing to use the PASPGP, you would answer ‘yes’ to this question. No Page 236 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 5 of 11 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. [Semantic] Is the action area located within 0.5 miles of a known bat hibernaculum or winter roost? Note: The map queried for this question contains proprietary information and cannot be displayed. If you need additional information, please contact your state wildlife agency. Automatically answered No Does the action area contain any winter roosts or caves (or associated sinkholes, fissures, or other karst features), mines, rocky outcroppings, or tunnels that could provide habitat for hibernating bats? No Does the action area contain (1) talus or (2) anthropogenic or naturally formed rock shelters or crevices in rocky outcrops, rock faces or cliffs? No Will the action cause effects to a bridge? Note: Covered bridges should be considered as bridges in this question. No Will the action result in effects to a culvert or tunnel at any time of year? No Are trees present within 1000 feet of the action area? Note: If there are trees within the action area that are of a sufficient size to be potential roosts for bats answer "Yes". If unsure, additional information defining suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat and tricolored bat can be found in Appendix A of the USFWS’ Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern long-eared bat Survey Guidelines at: https://www.fws.gov/media/range-wide-indiana-bat-and-northern-long-eared-bat-survey- guidelines. Yes Does the action include the intentional exclusion of bats from a building or building-like structure? Note: Exclusion is conducted to deny bats’ entry or reentry into a building. To be effective and to avoid harming bats, it should be done according to established standards. If your action includes bat exclusion and you are unsure whether northern long-eared bats or tricolored bats are present, answer “Yes.” Answer “No” if there are no signs of bat use in the building/structure. If unsure, contact your local Ecological Services Field Office to help assess whether northern long-eared bats or tricolored bats may be present. Contact a Nuisance Wildlife Control Operator (NWCO) for help in how to exclude bats from a structure safely without causing harm to the bats (to find a NWCO certified in bat standards, search the Internet using the search term “National Wildlife Control Operators Association bats”). Also see the White-Nose Syndrome Response Team's guide for bat control in structures. No Page 237 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 6 of 11 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Does the action involve removal, modification, or maintenance of a human-made building- like structure (barn, house, or other building) known or suspected to contain roosting bats? No Will the action cause construction of one or more new roads open to the public? For federal actions, answer ‘yes’ when the construction or operation of these facilities is either (1) part of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a federal agency (federal permit, funding, etc.). Yes Will any new road go through any area of contiguous forest that is greater than or equal to 10 acres in total extent? Note: "Contiguous forest" of 10 acres or more may includes areas where multiple forest patches are separated by less than 1,000 feet of non-forest if the forested patches, added together, comprise at least 10 acres. No Will any new road pass between two patches of contiguous forest that are each greater than or equal to 10 acres in extent and are separated by less than 1,000 feet? Bats may cross a road by flying between forest patches that are up to 1,000 feet apart. Note: "Contiguous forest" of 10 acres or more may includes areas where multiple forest patches are separated by less than 1,000 feet of non-forested area if the forested patches, added together, comprise at least 10 acres. No Will the action include or cause any construction or other activity that is reasonably certain to increase average night-time traffic permanently or temporarily on one or more existing roads? Note: For federal actions, answer ‘yes’ when the construction or operation of these facilities is either (1) part of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a federal agency (federal permit, funding, etc.). . Yes Will the increased vehicle traffic occur on any road that lies between any two areas of contiguous forest that are each greater than or equal to 10 acres in extent and are separated by less than 1,000 feet? Bats may cross a road by flying between forest patches that are up to 1,000 feet apart. Note: "Contiguous forest" of 10 acres or more may includes areas where multiple forest patches are separated by less than 1,000 feet of non-forested area if the forested patches, added together, comprise at least 10 acres. No Page 238 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 7 of 11 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Will the proposed Action involve the creation of a new water-borne contaminant source (e.g., leachate pond, pits containing chemicals that are not NSF/ANSI 60 compliant)? Note: For information regarding NSF/ANSI 60 please visit https://www.nsf.org/knowledge-library/nsf-ansi- standard-60-drinking-water-treatment-chemicals-health-effects No Will the proposed action involve the creation of a new point source discharge from a facility other than a water treatment plant or storm water system? No Will the action include drilling or blasting? No Will the action involve military training (e.g., smoke operations, obscurant operations, exploding munitions, artillery fire, range use, helicopter or fixed wing aircraft use at night)? No Will the proposed action involve the use of herbicides or pesticides (e.g., fungicides, insecticides, or rodenticides)? No Will the action include or cause activities that are reasonably certain to cause chronic or intense nighttime noise (above current levels of ambient noise in the area) in suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat or tricolored bat during the active season? Chronic noise is noise that is continuous or occurs repeatedly again and again for a long time. Sources of chronic or intense noise that could cause adverse effects to bats may include, but are not limited to: road traffic; trains; aircraft; industrial activities; gas compressor stations; loud music; crowds; oil and gas extraction; construction; and mining. Note: Additional information defining suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat and tricolored bat can be found in Appendix A of the USFWS’ Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern long-eared bat Survey Guidelines at: https://www.fws.gov/media/range-wide-indiana-bat-and-northern-long-eared-bat-survey- guidelines. No Does the action include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, the use of permanent or temporary artificial lighting within 1000 feet of suitable northern long-eared bat or tricolored bat roosting habitat? Note: Additional information defining suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat and tricolored bat can be found in Appendix A of the USFWS’ Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern long-eared bat Survey Guidelines at: https://www.fws.gov/media/range-wide-indiana-bat-and-northern-long-eared-bat-survey- guidelines. No Page 239 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 8 of 11 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Will the action include tree cutting or other means of knocking down or bringing down trees, tree topping, or tree trimming? Yes Is the project related to the production of coal, including projects that support the mining of coal, as well as the production and/or distribution of energy produced from coal? No Will the proposed action occur exclusively in an already established and currently maintained utility right-of-way? No Does the action include emergency cutting or trimming of hazard trees in order to remove an imminent threat to human safety or property? See hazard tree note at the bottom of the key for text that will be added to response letters Note: A "hazard tree" is a tree that is an immediate threat to lives, public health and safety, or improved property. No Does the project intersect with the 0- 9.9% forest density category? Automatically answered Yes Does the project intersect with the 10.0- 19.9% forest density category map? Automatically answered No Does the project intersect with the 20.0- 29.9% forest density category map? Automatically answered No Does the project intersect with the 30.0- 100% forest density category map? Automatically answered No Will the action cause trees to be cut, knocked down, or otherwise brought down across an area greater than 0.5 acre in total extent? Yes Does the action area intersect the tricolored bat species list area? Automatically answered Yes Is the action area located within 0.5-mile of radius of an entrance/opening to any known tricolored bat hibernacula or winter roost? Note: The map queried for this question contains proprietary information and cannot be displayed. If you need additional information, please contact your state wildlife agency. Automatically answered No Page 240 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 9 of 11 37. 38. 39. 40. [Semantic] Is the action area located within 0.25 miles of a culvert that is known to be occupied by northern long-eared or tricolored bats? Note: The map queried for this question contains proprietary information and cannot be displayed. If you need additional information, please contact your State wildlife agency. Automatically answered No Has a presence/probable absence bat survey targeting the tricolored bat and following the Service’s Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern Long-Eared Bat Survey Guidelines been conducted within the project area? No Is suitable summer habitat for the tricolored bat present within 1000 feet of project activities? (If unsure, answer ""Yes."") Note: If there are trees within the action area that may provide potential roosts for tricolored bats (e.g., clusters of leaves in live and dead deciduous trees, Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides), clusters of dead pine needles of large live pines) answer ""Yes."" For a complete definition of suitable summer habitat for the tricolored bat, please see Appendix A in the Service's Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern long-eared Bat Survey Guidelines. Yes Do you have any documents that you want to include with this submission? No Page 241 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 10 of 11 PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE Enter the extent of the action area (in acres) from which trees will be removed - round up to the nearest tenth of an acre. For this question, include the entire area where tree removal will take place, even if some live or dead trees will be left standing. 0.2 Page 242 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175426942 01/16/2026 17:26:51 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 01/14/2026 11 of 11 IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency:Private Entity Name:Kimberly Zlimen Address:550 Vandalia Street Address Line 2:Suite 205 City:St. Paul State:MN Zip:55114 Email kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com Phone:6123967618 Page 243 of 454 01/16/2026 17:32:50 UTC United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Minnesota-Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office 3815 American Blvd East Bloomington, MN 55425-1659 Phone: (952) 858-0793 In Reply Refer To: Project code: 2026-0024932 Project Name: Vermillion Reserve Federal Nexus: no Federal Action Agency (if applicable): Subject:Technical Assistance letter for 'Vermillion Reserve' for rusty patched bumble bee that may occur in your proposed project location consistent with the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Range Wide Determination Key (RPBB DKey). Dear Kimberly Zlimen: This letter records your determination using the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on January 16, 2026, for 'Vermillion Reserve' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned Project Code ‘2026-0024932’ and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number. Please carefully review this letter. Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC Determination Keys The USFWS developed the IPaC system and associated species’ determination keys in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). All information submitted by the Project proponent into the IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project. Failure to accurately represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the RPBB DKey, invalidates this letter. Determination for the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Based on your answers and the assistance of the USFWS’ RPBB DKey, you made the following effect determination for the proposed Action: Species Listing Status Determination Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis)Endangered No effect Page 244 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175427148 01/16/2026 17:32:50 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 12/19/2025 2 of 7 ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ This determination was reached because the Action Area does not currently contain rusty patched bumble bee habitat, nor will rusty patched bumble bee habitat will be created. Your agency has met its ESA section 7 consultation requirements for rusty patched bumble bee for the Action and no further coordination is required for this species. Please review the proposed Action for effects to other federally listed species (see below) Thank you for informing the Service of your “No Effect” determination for Rusty Patched Bumble Bee. Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area The IPaC-assisted determination key for the rusty patched bumble bee does not apply to the following ESA-protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area: Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Proposed Threatened Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered Western Regal Fritillary Argynnis idalia occidentalis Proposed Threatened Whooping Crane Grus americana Experimental Population, Non-Essential Coordination with the USFWS is advised for any species and/or critical habitat listed above. You should coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may affect the species and/or critical habitat listed above and if further consultation is required. Note that reinitiation of consultation would be necessary if a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action before it is complete. If you have any questions regarding this letter or need further assistance, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office and reference Project Code ‘2026-0024932’ associated with this Project. See the top of this letter for the Project Code. Additional Information Sufficient project details: Please provide sufficient project details on your project homepage in IPaC (Define Project, Project Description) to support your conclusions. Failure to disclose important aspects of your project that would influence the outcome of your effects determinations may negate your determinations and invalidate this letter. If you have site-specific information that leads you to believe a different determination is more appropriate for your project than what the Dkey concludes, you can and should proceed based on the best available information. Future project changes: The Service recommends that you contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or re-evaluate the project in IPaC if: 1) the scope or location of the proposed Action is changed; 2) new information reveals that the action may affect rusty patched bumble bee in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; 3) the Action is modified in a manner that causes effects to rusty patched bumble bee; or 4) or critical habitat is designated. If any of the Page 245 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175427148 01/16/2026 17:32:50 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 12/19/2025 3 of 7 above conditions occur, additional consultation with the Service should take place before project changes are final or resources are committed. Species-specific information Bald and Golden Eagles: Bald eagles, golden eagles, and their nests are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (54 Stat. 250, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 668a-d) (Eagle Act). The Eagle Act prohibits, except when authorized by an Eagle Act permit, the “taking” of bald and golden eagles and defines “take” as “pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb.” The Eagle Act’s implementing regulations define disturb as “… to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, (1) injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3) nest abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior.” If you observe a bald eagle nest in the vicinity of your proposed project, you should follow the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (May 2007). For more information on eagles and conducting activities in the vicinity of an eagle nest, please visit our regional eagle website or contact the local Ecological Services Field Office. If the Action may affect bald or golden eagles, additional coordination with the Service under the Eagle Act may be required. Page 246 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175427148 01/16/2026 17:32:50 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 12/19/2025 4 of 7 Action Description You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action. 1. Name Vermillion Reserve 2. Description The following description was provided for the project 'Vermillion Reserve': Lennar Homes proposes to develop an estimated 370 single-family residential homes on approximately 158.3 acres previously used for agricultural production. The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@44.628057749999996,-93.16203312937013,14z Page 247 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175427148 01/16/2026 17:32:50 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 12/19/2025 5 of 7 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. QUALIFICATION INTERVIEW Is the action authorized, funded, or being carried out by a Federal agency? No Does the action area overlap with a rusty patched bumble bee high potential zone? Automatically answered Yes Does the action include - or is it reasonably certain to cause - intentional take of rusty patched bumble bee (rusty patched bumble bee) that is not covered under a scientific recovery permit under section 10(A)1(a) of the Endangered Species Act or under a cooperative agreement with a state agency? Note: This could include, for example, surveys or studies that include handling or capture of the species. Whether "Project Review" surveys using USFWS protocols were conducted as part of the action is addressed later in this key. No Does the action include – or is it reasonably certain to result in – construction of one or more new roads or rail lines that will result in vehicle traffic speeds at 45mph or higher in a rusty patched bumble bee HPZ? For example, answer NO if the project will construct a low speed (< 30 mph) road (Such as Forest Service Road Maintenance Levels 1 -3 (refer to https://www.fs.usda.gov/eng/pubs/pdf/05771205.pdf). No Does the action include – or is it reasonably certain to result in – the addition of one or more travel lanes that are likely to increase vehicle speeds to at least 45mphon one or more existing roads in a rusty patched bumble bee HPZ? For example, answer NO if considering a travel lane addition that maintains road with low speeds (< 30 mph). No Is an increase in vehicular traffic speeds to over 45mph to an existing road in one or more HPZs a likely outcome of the federal action? For example, answer NO if the federal action will increase if traffic speeds would stay relatively low (e.g., 30 mph). No Does the action include – or is it reasonably certain to cause – the use of commercial/ managed bees (e.g., the use of honeybees or managed bumble bees to pollinate crops). No Is there habitat for nesting, foraging, and/or overwintering for the rusty patched bumble bee in the action area? Note: Please refer to the ESA Section 7(a)(2) Voluntary Implementation technical assistance for Rusty Patched Bumble Bee . No Page 248 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175427148 01/16/2026 17:32:50 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 12/19/2025 6 of 7 9.Will the proposed action restore habitat for the species in the action area? For a description of rusty patched bumble bee nesting and foraging habitats, see the section 7 guidelines. Note: that if the action may affect areas outside of the immediate project footprint that contain rusty patched bumble bee habitat, answer ‘yes.’ This may include, for example, use of application of any pesticide (e.g., insecticide, herbicide, or fungicide) that may drift or be otherwise transported outside of the targeted area. No Page 249 of 454 Project code: 2026-0024932 IPaC Record Locator: 166-175427148 01/16/2026 17:32:50 UTC DKey Version Publish Date: 12/19/2025 7 of 7 IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency:Private Entity Name:Kimberly Zlimen Address:550 Vandalia Street Address Line 2:Suite 205 City:St. Paul State:MN Zip:55114 Email kzlimen@swansonhaskamp.com Phone:6123967618 Page 250 of 454 APPENDIX C Geotechnical Boring Logs Page 251 of 454 220TH STREET W. 225TH STREET W. DE N M A R K A V E N U E ( C S A H 3 1 ) ST-2 ST-3 ST-8 ST-9 ST-15 ST-16 ST-14 ST-10 ST-4 ST-11 ST-7 ST-12 ST-13 ST-6 ST-5 ST-1 N DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1"= 300' 300'150' F: \ 2 0 2 5 \ B 2 5 0 7 3 8 6 _ 0 1 \ C A D \ B 2 5 0 7 3 8 6 - 0 1 . d w g ,Ge o t e c h ,10 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 5 1 1 : 4 3 : 2 2 A M braunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2507386-01 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified:10/17/25 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information B2507386.01 JAG 9/29/25 RB Adelmann Property Southwest Intersection of 220th Street W. and Denmark Avenue Farmington, Minnesota Soil Boring Location Sketch Pa g e 2 5 2 o f 4 5 4 Elev./ Depth ft 914.0 1.3 900.8 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, with Silt seams, brown, moist to wet, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 3-3-4 (7) 13" 3-3-2 (5) 6" 3-2-4 (6) 13" 5-5-5 (10) 10" 5-6-6 (12) 23" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.5 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-01 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157737.4 EASTING:539582.4 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:915.3 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bean Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-01 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 253 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 912.9 1.3 905.2 9.0 902.2 12.0 899.7 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, brown, wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-3-3 (6) 9" 3-2-4 (6) 11" 5-7-8 (15) 12" 7-8-9 (17) 14" 12-11-8 (19) 13" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-02 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157686.3 EASTING:541117.0 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:914.2 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Soil WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-02 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 254 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 913.9 1.0 910.9 4.0 902.9 12.0 896.9 18.0 893.9 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL FILL) FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP- SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense to loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-3-6 (9) 5" 7-8-9 (17) 12" 9-11-10 (21) 10" 5-7-8 (15) 9" 6-9-9 (18) 10" 9-6-3 (9) 9" 3-4-5 (9) 14" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-03 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157319.2 EASTING:541313.8 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:914.9 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-03 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 255 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 913.8 1.0 905.8 9.0 902.8 12.0 895.8 19.0 893.8 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense to loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 3-2-3 (5) 13" 5-4-3 (7) 9" 5-7-10 (17) 14" 6-6-6 (12) 13" 6-7-8 (15) 13" 7-4-6 (10) 11" 4-5-6 (11) 13" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-04 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157448.2 EASTING:540287.2 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:914.8 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-04 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 256 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 917.2 0.5 905.7 12.0 903.7 14.0 896.7 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, light brown to brown, dry to moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 3-7-8 (15) 8" 9-10-12 (22) 9" 7-7-10 (17) 11" 7-9-9 (18) 10" 9-11-12 (23) 10" 2-2-4 (6) 7" 2-4-4 (8) 16" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 13.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-05 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157467.1 EASTING:539093.4 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:917.7 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bean field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-05 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 257 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 918.7 0.7 904.9 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry to moist, loose to dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-2-5 (7) 8" 7-10-11 (21) 10" 11-12-12 (24) 13" 8-12-13 (25) 13" 20-25-21 (46) 12" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-06 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:156900.2 EASTING:539016.0 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:919.4 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bean field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-06 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 258 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 918.5 0.8 905.3 14.0 898.3 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry to wet, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-2-3 (5) 8" 5-8-10 (18) 10" 8-9-10 (19) 11" 7-10-12 (22) 9" 7-10-10 (20) 8" 3-2-3 (5) 10" 2-3-5 (8) 22" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 14.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-07 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:156639.9 EASTING:539527.2 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:919.3 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bean Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-07 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 259 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 912.6 1.4 905.0 9.0 901.0 13.0 899.5 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-5-5 (10) 10" 5-4-3 (7) 7" 2-1-2 (3) 11" 2-1-3 (4) 9" 4-4-5 (9) 20" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 9.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-08 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:156959.0 EASTING:540950.7 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:914.0 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-08 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 260 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 915.8 0.6 895.4 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry to wet (GLACIAL OUTWASH) Layer of SILT at 13 feet Layer of SILTY SAND at 15 1/2 feet END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-3-3 (6) 10" 8-5-7 (12) 9" 5-8-10 (18) 12" 8-8-8 (16) 8" 4-4-7 (11) 11" 1-2-4 (6) 24" 1-2-4 (6) 26" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-09 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:156386.8 EASTING:541421.5 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:916.4 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-09 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 261 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 914.8 1.3 907.1 9.0 901.6 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-3-4 (7) 10" 8-10-12 (22) 10" 6-8-10 (18) 11" 6-8-6 (14) 12" 4-6-6 (12) 13" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-10 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:156291.7 EASTING:540549.3 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:916.1 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-10 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 262 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 917.8 0.7 906.5 12.0 904.0 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-2-8 (10) 8" 6-10-12 (22) 12" 10-9-12 (21) 10" 9-10-12 (22) 13" 6-6-7 (13) 14" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-11 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:156420.7 EASTING:539940.7 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:918.5 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bean Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-11 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 263 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 918.8 0.9 910.7 9.0 905.2 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to dry, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense to loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-2-6 (8) 10" 8-12-14 (26) 10" 6-9-10 (19) 10" 4-5-7 (12) 11" 2-3-3 (6) 22" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 12.5 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-12 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:155872.7 EASTING:539181.3 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:919.7 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bean Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-12 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 264 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 916.0 0.6 909.6 7.0 907.6 9.0 896.1 20.5 895.6 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SILTY SAND (SM), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry to moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, light brown, wet, very loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine-grained, gray, wet, very loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 3-5-10 (15) 8" 10-13-12 (25) 9" 4-2-4 (6) 10" 0-0-1 (1) 7" 0-1-1 (2) 21" 1-1-1 (2) 13" 1-1-1 (2) 24" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 7.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-13 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:155401.0 EASTING:539559.2 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/06/25 END DATE:10/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:916.6 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bean Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-13 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 265 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 914.7 1.5 907.2 9.0 901.7 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL FILL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to wet, very loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) Layer of SILTY SAND at 14 feet END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-2-2 (4) 10" 7-7-7 (14) 9" 7-9-12 (21) 10" 7-6-6 (12) 12" 1-8-8 (16) 24" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 7.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-14 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:155481.7 EASTING:540485.9 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:916.2 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-14 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 266 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 913.7 1.5 908.2 7.0 900.7 14.5 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist to wet, very loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-2-2 (4) 13" 6-6-8 (14) 9" 3-1-2 (3) 9" 2-2-1 (3) 6" 2-5-6 (11) 24" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 10.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-15 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:155958.1 EASTING:541223.9 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:915.2 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-15 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 267 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 916.1 0.7 907.8 9.0 904.8 12.0 895.8 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) LEAN CLAY (CL), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, dry to moist, medium dense to dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse- grained, brown, wet, loose to very loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) With a layer of SILT at 20 1/2 feet END OF BORING Boring then grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 2-4-10 (14) 9" 10-12-14 (26) 11" 8-14-18 (32) 8" 5-7-8 (15) 10" 3-2-4 (6) 20" 1-1-1 (2) 10" 1-2-2 (4) 22" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water observed at 7.5 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2507386.01 Geotechnical Evaluation Adelmann Property SW Intersection of 220th St W & Denmark Ave Farmington, Minnesota BORING:ST-16 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:155423.3 EASTING:541384.5 DRILLER:B. Kammermeier LOGGED BY:J. Franz START DATE:10/07/25 END DATE:10/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:916.8 ft RIG:7506 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Corn Field WEATHER: B2507386.01 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:10/30/2025 ST-16 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 268 of 454 APPENDIX D Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Page 269 of 454 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Adelman Property 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Prepared for U.S. Home, LLC Prepared by Braun Intertec Corporation Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Page 270 of 454 December 5, 2025 Project B2507386 Mr. Collin Coffman U.S. Home, LLC 16355 36th Avenue North, Suite #100 Plymouth, MN 55446 Re: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Adelman Property 4752 220th Street W. Farmington, Minnesota Dear Mr. Coffman: In accordance with your written authorization, Braun Intertec Corporation (Braun Intertec) conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the above-referenced property (Site). The objective of the Phase I ESA was to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site and to assist in satisfying All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) standards and practices. The Phase I ESA was conducted in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM International (ASTM) Practice E1527-21 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312. The Phase I ESA was prepared on behalf of, and for sole use by, U.S. Home, LLC (Client) unless otherwise specified in Section 1.3 of the following report. Please refer to the report for the scope, methods, and conclusions of our assessment. We appreciate the opportunity to provide professional services to you for this project. If you have any questions regarding the following report, please contact Brandon Brayfield at 218.310.6362 or bbrayfield@braunintertec.com. Sincerely, Braun Intertec Corporation Nikki M. Rhodes Project Scientist Brandon M. Brayfield, PG Supervisor, Senior Scientist Page 271 of 454 Braun Intertec Page i Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ A 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Services ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Use of Report ................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Limitations, Significant Assumptions, and Exceptions ........................................................ 2 1.5 Viability ............................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 User Provided Information ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Environmental Liens ......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Activity and Use Limitations .............................................................................................. 5 2.3 Specialized Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ................................................................... 5 2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information .............................................. 5 2.6 Degree of Obviousness ..................................................................................................... 5 2.7 Other ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 Site Location and Description ................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Site Description and Use .................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties ........................................................................... 7 4.0 Records Review ..................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Physical Setting ................................................................................................................ 7 4.1.1 Topography ................................................................................................................ 7 4.1.2 Geology ..................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.3 Hydrogeology ............................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Regulatory Database Review ............................................................................................. 9 4.2.1 Site ............................................................................................................................ 9 4.2.2 Adjoining Properties ................................................................................................. 10 4.2.3 Surrounding Area ..................................................................................................... 10 4.2.4 Unmapped Facilities ................................................................................................ 11 4.2.5 Additional Environmental Record Sources ................................................................. 11 4.2.6 Regulatory Agency File and Records Review .............................................................. 14 4.3 Historical Use Information Review................................................................................... 14 4.3.1 Fire Insurance Maps ................................................................................................. 14 4.3.2 Topographic Maps .................................................................................................... 14 4.3.3 Aerial Photographs ................................................................................................... 15 4.3.4 City Directories ........................................................................................................ 16 4.3.5 Previous Environmental Documents .......................................................................... 17 4.3.6 Summary of Site History ........................................................................................... 17 4.3.7 Summary of Historical Information for Adjoining and Area Properties .......................... 17 Page 272 of 454 Table of Contents (Continued) Braun Intertec Page ii 5.0 Site Reconnaissance ............................................................................................................ 17 5.1 Observations, Methodology and Limiting Conditions ........................................................ 18 5.2 Site Observations ........................................................................................................... 18 5.2.1 Site Description ....................................................................................................... 18 5.2.2 Pits, Ponds, Pools of Liquid, or Lagoons ..................................................................... 18 5.2.3 Stained or Corroded Surfaces ................................................................................... 18 5.2.4 Solid Waste Disposal ................................................................................................ 18 5.2.5 Stressed Vegetation .................................................................................................. 19 5.2.6 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products ....................................................... 19 5.2.7 Storage Tanks ........................................................................................................... 19 5.2.8 Drums and Unidentified Substance Containers ......................................................... 19 5.2.9 Odors ...................................................................................................................... 19 5.2.10 Potential PCB-Containing Electrical and Hydraulic Equipment ................................... 19 5.2.11 Wastewater Discharges ............................................................................................ 19 5.2.12 Sewage Disposal System .......................................................................................... 19 5.2.13 Wells ....................................................................................................................... 20 5.2.14 Potable Water Supply ............................................................................................... 20 5.2.15 Additional On-Site Observations ............................................................................... 20 5.3 Current and Past Use of Adjoining Properties and Surrounding Area .................................. 20 6.0 Interviews ............................................................................................................................ 20 6.1 Site Representatives ....................................................................................................... 21 6.2 Site Occupants .............................................................................................................. 21 6.3 Local Government Officials ............................................................................................ 22 6.4 Others ........................................................................................................................... 22 7.0 Data Gaps ............................................................................................................................ 22 8.0 Findings and Opinions .......................................................................................................... 22 9.0 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 24 10.0 Environmental Professional Statement.................................................................................. 25 Figures Figure 1: Site Location Figure 2: Site Layout Appendix A. Definitions Appendix B. User Questionnaire and User-Provided Documents Appendix C. County Property Information Appendix D. References Page 273 of 454 Table of Contents (Continued) Braun Intertec Page iii Appendix E. Environmental Database Report Appendix F. Local Records and Agency-Reviewed Records Appendix G. Fire Insurance Maps Appendix H. Topographic Maps Appendix I. Aerial Photographs Appendix J. City Directories Appendix K. Site Photographs Appendix L. Qualifications of Consultants Page 274 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Executive Summary Page A Executive Summary Braun Intertec conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located at 4752 220th Street W. in Farmington, MN (Subject Property, hereafter referred to as Site) in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM International (ASTM) Practice E1527-21 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312. The Site consists of one parcel totaling 158.26 acres. The area along the north central property line is developed as a farmstead. The farmstead consists of two vacant residences, a detached garage, four farm- related outbuildings (a barn/workshop building, a metal storage building and two wood structures), a silo, concrete pads associated with a former barn and silo, an irrigation well, a potable water well and two septic systems. The residence at 4746 220th Street W. is a single story house with a partial basement. The residence at 4752 220th Street W. is a two-story house with a partial basement. Both residences are currently not heated and were previously heated via natural gas since at least 1933. The barn/workshop building is heated via natural gas on an as needed basis. The detached garage, storage building and the two wood structures are unheated. A total of four natural gas pipelines transect through the central portion of the Site in a northeast-southwest alignment. The northeast portion of the Site is graded, crops were removed due to work on the natural gas pipelines which transect the property from the northeast portion to the south-southwest portion of the Site. The remaining areas of the property are utilized for agricultural purposes. Based on the readily available historical information, by 1937 the Site consisted of a farmstead with multiple structures near the north central property line, railroad tracks intersected the southeast portion of the Site, a low lying area was noted in the southwest portion of the Site and the remaining portions of the Site was utilized as agricultural land. Based on historical aerial photographs and topographic maps, no railroad spur was located on the Site. At least one of the natural gas pipelines was present transecting the property by 1951. By 1984, it is apparent that the railroad tracks in the southeast portion of the Site are no longer present and an irrigation system was being utilized on the cropland and remains at the present date. A house was previously located at 4758 220th Street W. (west of current residences), was demolished in November of 2018. A barn once stood at center of the farmstead. The former occupants the Adelmann’s, did not have livestock at the facility. Instead, the barn was utilized to package potatoes for wholesale. The barn was razed in approximately 2015 however, the concrete slab remains. No obvious indications of environmental concerns were noted on adjoining or nearby properties at the time of the reconnaissance, based on limited observations from the public right of way. Historically the surrounding area was utilized for agricultural purposes with farmsteads. Currently the area to the north is being developed for residential purposes; to the east is developed with a church, senior living, residential and commercial properties; to the south and west by primarily agricultural and undeveloped land. This assessment has revealed the following recognized environmental condition in connection with the Site. Page 275 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Executive Summary Page B Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) ▪ Stains were noted on the concrete floor of the barn/workshop building where it is assumed farm- related maintenance activities occurred. Petroleum products (machinery related maintenance products) and a part washing station were observed within the barn/workshop building. The Site has been used for cultivate agricultural purposes and developed with farmstead buildings for at least 90 years. Based on the use and storage or petroleum products and hazardous substances over an extended period of time, the potential for the historical releases of hazardous materials or petroleum products to the subsurface at the Site is a REC. ▪ According to information provided by the Site owner, a corn crib was dismantled and buried at the Site approximately 40 years ago. The corn crib building materials were reportedly buried east of the metal storage building. The buried building debris at the Site reported by the owner is a REC. Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) This assessment has revealed no CRECs in connection with the Site. Significant Data Gaps This assessment did not identify significant data gaps that affected our ability to identify the presence of RECs in connection with the Site. Page 276 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 1 1.0 Introduction Braun Intertec conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property located at 4752 220th Street W. in Farmington, MN (Subject Property, hereafter referred to as Site). The Site is 158.26 acres in size and is utilized as a farmstead and agricultural land. 1.1 Purpose The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) rule allows a user to qualify for certain protections from Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability for innocent landowners, bona fide prospective purchasers, and contiguous property owners in that it constitutes all appropriate inquiry into prior ownership and use of a property prior to or on the date of property acquisition. The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible pursuant to the processes defined by ASTM International (ASTM) Standard Practice E1527-21 (ASTM E1527-21), recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site and to assist in satisfying All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) standards and practices. Definitions of common terms associated with ASTM 1527-21 are presented in Appendix A. A recognized environmental condition (REC) is defined by ASTM E1527-21 as “(1) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release to the environment; (2) the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or (3) the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the subject property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” For the purposes of this definition, “likely” is that which is neither certain nor proved but can be expected or believed by a reasonable observer based on the logic and/or experience of the Environmental Professional (EP), and/or available evidence, as stated in the report to support the opinions given therein. A REC may include a controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) which is defined by ASTM E1527- 21 as “a recognized environmental condition affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations).” A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) is defined by ASTM E1527-21 as “ a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the subject property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the subject property to any controls (for example, activity and use limitations or other property use limitations). A historical recognized environmental condition is not a recognized environmental condition.” Page 277 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 2 1.2 Scope of Services The Phase I ESA was conducted in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E1527-21 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312. Generally, this scope of services as defined by ASTM E1527-21 included the following. ▪ Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens (a User Responsibility). ▪ Reviews of federal, tribal, state, and local government records. ▪ A review of readily available historical information; interviews with owners, operators, and occupants (as available). ▪ Visual reconnaissance of the Site and of adjoining properties. ▪ Preparation of this report. 1.3 Use of Report According to the User, the Phase I ESA was conducted in association with the acquisition and redevelopment of the Site. The Phase I ESA was prepared on behalf of, and for use by, U.S. Home, LLC (User) in accordance with the contract between U.S. Home, LLC (Client) and Braun Intertec, including the Braun Intertec General Conditions or specific contractual terms agreed between parties. No other party has a right to rely on the contents of the Phase I ESA without written authorization by Braun Intertec. All authorized parties are entitled to rely on the report according to our contract with Client, and under the same terms, conditions, and circumstances. Please note that our contract with Client may contain a limitation of our total liability. If so, such limitation also applies to all those receiving this permission. 1.4 Limitations, Significant Assumptions, and Exceptions The scope of work defined by the ASTM E1527-21 is not intended to provide a universal analysis of potential environmental risks and hazards. A Phase I ESA cannot wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. This Phase I ESA included no evaluation of non-ASTM scope considerations such as those listed in ASTM E1527-21, Section 13.1 unless otherwise addressed in this report. These include, but are not limited to, asbestos-containing materials (ACM), radon, indoor air quality, mold or microbial growth conditions, lead- based paint (LBP), lead in drinking water, or wetlands. A complete evaluation of business environmental risk associated with a parcel of commercial real estate may necessitate investigation beyond that addressed by this scope of work. Vapor migration in the subsurface is described by ASTM E2600; however, ASTM E1527-21 Page 278 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 3 does not require application of the E2600 standard to achieve compliance with AAI. An ASTM E2600-15 vapor encroachment screen is not within the scope of this Phase I ESA and will not be conducted unless specifically requested by the User. However, vapors present or likely present from hazardous substances or petroleum products are considered no differently than hazardous substances or petroleum products present or likely present as a result of a release to the environment. The determination of whether a REC related to vapor encroachment actually exists may require additional information or evaluation that is beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA. Observations made regarding the layout of the Site and surrounding properties were true at the time of this assessment. Although these features are described using present tense, many described features are not permanent and may change over time. No significant assumptions were made for this assessment. The findings of this Phase I ESA are based solely upon evaluation of information from the sources referenced within this report. The information obtained from records review is limited to that which is reasonably ascertainable, as defined by ASTM E1527-21. Information obtained from businesses or individuals is limited to that which is voluntarily disclosed. The identification of conditions that could affect the Site may be limited by the availability and accuracy of information provided by governmental and private sources. To the extent practical, the accuracy of information obtained has been verified. The information presented in this report is based upon records that are currently available and upon the conditions that existed at the time of our visual reconnaissance of the Site. Limiting conditions, if any, present at the time observations of the Site were made are detailed in Section 5.1. 1.5 Viability Subject to Section 4.6 (Continued Viability of ESA) and Section 6 (User’s Responsibilities) of ASTM E1527-21, an environmental site assessment meeting or exceeding this practice and for which the information was collected or updated within 1 year prior to the date of acquisition of the Site may be used provided that the following components of the inquiries were updated within 180 days of the date of purchase or the date of the intended transaction. ▪ Interviews with owners, operators, and occupants. ▪ Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens (a User Responsibility). ▪ Reviews of federal, tribal, state, and local government records. ▪ Visual reconnaissance of the Site and of adjoining properties. ▪ The declaration by the EP responsible for the assessment or update. The 180-day period shall commence from the completion of any of these components, whichever is first. The dates of the referenced components for this ESA are provided below. Page 279 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 4 Required ESA Components Date Completed Earliest date of interview of past and present owners, occupants, or operators August 25, 2025 Date of Environmental Lien Search or Title Commitment (if provided) Not provided Reviews of federal, tribal, state, and local government records August 20, 2025 Date of visual reconnaissance of subject and adjoining properties August 25, 2025 EP declaration/Phase I ESA Report Issuance Date December 5, 2025 2.0 User Provided Information The purpose of this section is to describe tasks to be performed by the “User.” The “User” as defined by ASTM E1527-21, is “the party seeking to use Practice E1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the subject property.” A User may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of property, a lender, or a property manager. ASTM E1527-21 identifies the following activities as User responsibilities: searches for environmental liens, assessments of any specialized knowledge on the part of the User, assessment of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the Site, and assessment of the relationship of the purchase price to fair market value. If the User conducts one or more of these inquiries and/or activities, ASTM E1527- 21 allows (but does not mandate) that the User may communicate information gathered from these inquiries and/or activities to their EP to identify a possible REC. However, failure to conduct these inquiries and communicate the information gathered to the EP could result in a determination that AAI is not complete. Braun Intertec provided a User Questionnaire to the Client to communicate information gathered from these inquiries and/or activities to the EP (Appendix B). As indicated in our contract, if multiple Users are requesting reliance on the Phase I ESA, the Client was responsible for forwarding a copy of the questionnaire to all appropriate entities (collectively the User). User-supplied information, if received, is discussed in the following sections. 2.1 Environmental Liens An environmental lien is a charge, security, or encumbrance, upon title to a property to secure the payment of a cost, damage, debt, obligation, or duty arising out of response actions, cleanup, or other remediation of hazardous substances or petroleum products upon a property. The User was not aware of a record of environmental liens recorded against the Site. Page 280 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 5 2.2 Activity and Use Limitations Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) are legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances or petroleum products in environmental media. The User was not aware of the presence of AULs recorded against the Site. 2.3 Specialized Knowledge Specialized environmental knowledge includes any information and/or experience related to the Site or nearby properties that is material to identifying RECs in connection with the Site. The User did not have specialized knowledge or experience regarding the Site or nearby properties. 2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues Valuation reduction for environmental issues includes the relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property. The User was not aware of information indicating any reduction in purchase price or fair market value due to environmental issues. 2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information includes information about the Site that is generally known to the public within the local community where the Site is located, and that is material to the identification of RECs in connection with the Site. The User was not aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the Site. 2.6 Degree of Obviousness The User must consider the degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of releases or threatened releases at the Site and the ability to detect releases or threatened releases by appropriate investigation. The User was not aware of any obvious indications of the presence or likely presence of releases or threatened releases at the Site. Page 281 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 6 2.7 Other No other information was provided by the User. 3.0 Site Location and Description Site information was obtained from User-provided information, observations during the Site reconnaissance, and from a review of readily available documents and online information sources. 3.1 Site Location A Site Location Map is included as Figure 1 (Figures). Information regarding the Site obtained from the county website is included in Appendix C. Relevant Site information obtained from the county website and from other sources is summarized below. Address: 4752 220th Street W. (AKA 4764) Main farmhouse 4746 220th Street W. small residence west of main farmhouse City: Farmington County: Dakota County State: Minnesota Property Identification Number: 13-00100-02-012 Construction Year: 4752 220th Street W. residence: ~1900 4746 220th Street W. residence: ~1900 4758 220th Street W. former west residence: between 1940 and 1951, demolished 2018 Detached garage: ~1975 Former barn: Prior to 1937, demolished in ~2015 Barn/workshop: Prior to 1937 Metal Storage building: ~1980s Wood storage building: 1950s Storage building: Between 1951 and 1957 Owner: Adelmann Farm, LLC Latitude: 44.627 North Longitude: -93.162 West Size: 158.26 acres Page 282 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 7 3.2 Site Description and Use The Site consists of one parcel totaling 158.26 acres. The area along the north central property line is developed as a farmstead. The farmstead consist of two vacant residences, a detached garage, four farm related out-buildings, a silo, concrete pads associated with a former barn and silo, an irrigation well, water well and two septic systems. The northeast portion of the Site was graded and utility work was being completed. A total of four natural gas pipeline transect the property from the northeast portion to the south- southwest portion. The remaining areas of the property are utilized for agricultural purposes. A Site Layout Plan is included as Figure 2 (Figures). 3.3 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties Direction Property Use North 220th Street W. with an area that is being developed located beyond South 225th Street W. with agricultural land located beyond East Denmark Avenue with the Church of St. Michael, a senior living facility, residences and Dakota Electric Association located beyond West A residence and undeveloped areas along the Vermillion River located beyond Adjoining properties are depicted on Figure 2 (Figures). 4.0 Records Review The purpose of the records review is to obtain and review records that will help identify RECs in connection with the Site. References identifying published sources and Client- or User-provided reports relied upon in preparation of this Phase I ESA are provided in Appendix D. 4.1 Physical Setting The purpose of the physical setting review is to provide information about the physical setting of the Site in order to aid in the evaluation of both physical characteristics of the Site and additional attribute data, which is useful in assessing the impact of migration of contaminants and subsequent impact on soils and/or groundwater. 4.1.1 Topography Surface elevation at the Site is approximately 919 feet above mean sea level, according to the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle for Farmington, MN. The area generally slopes to the north- northeast toward the Vermillion River. Page 283 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 8 4.1.2 Geology The surficial geology in the vicinity of the Site consists of undifferentiated New Ulm Formation, sand and gravel—stratified sand and gravel deposited by subaerial meltwater carrying sediment dominantly from the Des Moines lobe. Sand ranges from coarse- to fine-grained and is poorly to well-sorted. Generally dark yellowish-brown where oxidized and light olive-brown where less oxidized. Leaching observed up to 7 feet in places. Fast moving, sediment-laden meltwater of the Des Moines lobe cut and re-activated existing channels through the St. Croix moraine and pre-Late Pleistocene deposits, flowing generally southeast and east and covering wide swaths of the county. These channels were perhaps initially formed by meltwater of the Superior lobe during retreat, or as tunnel valleys during active deposition of the St. Croix moraine. The Des Moines-lobe meltwater likely flowed preferentially across these low areas or weakly compacted material in the moraine that eroded easily. Pattern indicates areas of pitting within the unit. Units may incorporate older sediment where meltwater scoured underlying material, primarily outwash of the Superior lobe, averaging 6 percent reds in the coarse-grained grain fraction. Shale percentage averages 4 percent. The unit is generally thick, approximately 50 to greater than 200 feet, especially where deep bedrock valleys underlie the glacial sediment. Multiple phases of downcutting are preserved by scarps within this unit (Gowan, Stanley, 2023). The bedrock geology in the vicinity of the Site consist of Shakopee Formation, a heterolithic unit composed of tan- to orangish-brown dolostone, sandy dolostone, sandstone, and shale. It may contain oolites, intraclasts, fossilized microbial mats (stromatolites), and chert nodules. Thickness of the Shakopee Formation beneath the St. Peter Sandstone varies across the county ranging from 80 feet to slightly over 200 feet (24 to 70 meters). It is thickest along and east of the Hudson–Afton horst. The Shakopee Formation thins on the west side of the Hudson–Afton horst and farther northwest into the Twin Cities basin. There are two members of the Shakopee Formation recognized in Minnesota, the Willow River and the New Richmond Members. The New Richmond Member is the lower part of the Shakopee Formation and is composed of fine- to medium-grained quartz sandstone as well as oolitic sandy dolostone. It is generally less than 10 feet (3 meters) thick in Dakota County and can be difficult to discern from the overlying Willow River Member (Squillace, 1979) (Steenberg, 2023). 4.1.3 Hydrogeology The depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the Site is expected to lie within 15 feet below land surface. According to published geologic information, the regional groundwater flow direction within the unconsolidated deposits in the Site vicinity is generally to the northeast. However, the local direction of groundwater flow may be affected by nearby streams, lakes, wells, and/or wetlands and may vary seasonally. The Site-specific groundwater flow direction was not determined through direct measurement during this Phase I ESA. Additional field investigation, beyond the Scope of Services of this Phase I ESA, would be required to determine this information. Page 284 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 9 4.2 Regulatory Database Review We obtained regulatory database information pertaining to the Site and surrounding area from Environmental Risk Information Services, Ltd. (ERIS). The ERIS report is a compilation of records of facilities that are included on current federal and state environmental regulatory databases. The databases were searched based on the specified minimum search distances from the Site as established by ASTM E1527-21. The ERIS report also includes a description, source reference, date of acquisition, and the specified approximate minimum search distance criteria for each database and list. A copy of the ERIS report is included in Appendix E. We reviewed the ERIS report to identify records that indicate known or potential RECs on the Site and/or surrounding area and to evaluate the likelihood for those RECs to impact the Site based upon their distance, topographic position relative to the Site, and the documented presence of contaminant releases that have not been remediated to the satisfaction of regulatory authorities. In addition to the ASTM standard environmental records reviewed, ERIS provides listings based upon review of supplemental federal, state and local records (where available), and on exclusive or proprietary databases. Where those databases yielded relevant information regarding environmental conditions at or proximate to the Site, they have been included in the discussion below. 4.2.1 Site Based on a review of the ERIS report, the Site is listed on the following databases: ▪ Drug Lab Clean Up – Dakota CO, 4758 220th Street (Map ID #1). The ERIS report indicates that the Site is listed on the Clandestine Drug Labs (CDL), Facility Registry Service/Facility Index (FINDS/FRS), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Agency Interest (AI), and National Clandestine Drug Labs (NCDL) databases. The Methamphetamine Laboratory Program at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) works to protect human health by providing technical advice on the remediation of clandestine methamphetamine production laboratories (meth labs) and decontamination of property exposed to meth lab activities. Identification on these regulatory database listings indicates that the facility was identified as a potential methamphetamine production laboratory and does not imply that a release has occurred. According to available information, the incident response activities were conducted in 2004. Eureka Township records indicate this residences was razed in November of 2018. During an interview with the Adelmann Farm representative in 2022 for an adjoining development, it was reported that the 4758 residence was inspected upon tenant removal by Dakota County personnel, who determined that residue present within the premises was consistent with that of heavy nicotine/tobacco use, rather than methamphetamine production. Therefore, it is our opinion that the listing of the Site on the regulatory databases is not a REC. Page 285 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 10 4.2.2 Adjoining Properties Based on the ERIS report, the following facility is identified on a property that adjoin the Site: ▪ Church of Saint Michael/Church of Saint Micheal, SE Corner of Denmark Avenue and Ash Street/22120 Denmark Avenue, Map ID #2 and #3, is located on the east adjoining property from the Site. The ERIS report indicates that the facility is listed on the MPCA FINDS, AI database, in this case for a construction stormwater permit and a hazardous material generator permit. The listing of the facility on the MPCA FINDS, and AI databases does not imply that a release has occurred and the facility is not a REC for the Site. ▪ Legacy Partners of Farmington, 22300 Denmark Avenue, Map ID #4, is located on the east adjoining property from the Site. The ERIS report indicates that the facility is listed on the MPCA FINDS, AI, and Resource Conservation and Recovery ACT Very Small Quantity Generator (RCRA VSQG) databases. The facility is a senior living center. The listing of the facility on the MPCA FINDS, AI, and RCRA VSQG databases does not imply that a release has occurred and the facility is not a REC for the Site. ▪ Vermillion Commons 4th Addition, 4755 220th Street West, Map ID #5, is located on the north adjoining property from the Site. The ERIS report indicates that the facility is listed on the MPCA AI database, in this case for a construction stormwater permit. The construction stormwater permit for the north adjoining property is not a REC for the Site. ▪ Robert F. Adelmann Farm, 22553 Denmark Avenue, Map ID #6, is located on the south adjoining property, upgradient from the Site. The ERIS report indicates that the facility is listed on the Feedlots and MPCA AI databases. The MPCA tracks locations of animal feedlot facilities. The locations of animal feedlots provide information and context to support decisions on animal health, land use, and maintaining environmental quality. The animal count indicates 35 dairy heifers. The listing of the facility on the Feedlots and MPCA AI databases is not a REC. ▪ Denmark Trail Townhomes, Denmark Avenue, Map ID #7, is located on the east adjoining property from the Site. The ERIS report indicates that the facility is listed on the MPCA AI database, in this case for a construction stormwater permit. The construction stormwater permit for the east adjoining property is not a REC for the Site. 4.2.3 Surrounding Area We reviewed the ERIS report for facilities located beyond adjoining properties that may indicate a release or likely release of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products that may impact the Site. Based on factors that include the nature of the database listing, regulatory status, distance from the Site, and/or location relative to the regional groundwater flow direction, as referenced in Section 4.1, the following facilities were identified report that appear to warrant further consideration as potential RECs. ▪ Dakota Electric Association, 4300 220th Street West, Map ID #11, is located approximately 0.19 mile to the east of the Site. The ERIS report indicates that the facility is listed on the Alternative Fuels, Aboveground Storage Tank (AST), Underground Storage Tank (UST) delisted Leaking Storage Tank (Delisted LST), LST Incident, MPCA AI, Polychlorinated Byphenyl Notifiers (PCB), RCRA VSQG, and Page 286 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 11 MPCA Site Assessment databases. The PCB database includes a list of facilities that have notified the EPA of PCB activities, which is required of any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs. In this case, the listing of the facility on the PCB database is likely related to the storage and use of electrical transformers and does not imply that a release has occurred. Listing on the RCRA VSQG database means that the facility is required to report their hazardous waste usage and does not imply that a release has occurred. According to the ERIS report, a petroleum release associated with a UST was discovered and reported to the MPCA on June 7, 2017. The petroleum release was assigned leak number LS0020399. A Limited Site Investigation was conducted. Approximately 2.3 cubic yards of soil was excavated as part of the cleanup activities. Groundwater was reportedly impacted by the release. The MPCA issued closure for LS0020399 on December 21, 2021. Based on the regulatory closed status, distance from the Site, and the cross- gradient position relative to the Site, it is our opinion that LS0020399 is not a REC for the Site. 4.2.4 Unmapped Facilities The ERIS report identified unmappable or orphan facilities, which, because of poor or inadequate address information, could not be located. Using online mapping resources, all unmappable facilities were identified outside the appropriate minimum search distances for the Site or could not be located based on the information provided. It is our opinion the unmappable facilities do not warrant further consideration as potential RECs. 4.2.5 Additional Environmental Record Sources To enhance and supplement the regulatory database report, we requested reasonably ascertainable local city, county or state records to identify information relevant to the identification of potential RECs at the Site. MPCA Land Application Database The MPCA Land Application Database, as made available online, was also reviewed as part of this assessment. This database contains the locations of approved biosolid land application sites, defined as the “process of incorporating products such as biosolids from wastewater treatment, manure, petroleum contaminated soil, or selected industrial by-products to agricultural land for treatment by natural process.” Identifying the presence of sites approved for land application in or near the investigation area is considered a potential risk for biosolid distribution. The accuracy and completeness of the data in the database is somewhat limited, and information regarding whether or not land application occurred was not provided; further, these locations simply represent the geographical center of a site where biosolid land applications were approved. As a result, these locations are approximate and do not indicate a confirmed land application of biosolids. No land application sites were plotted within the boundaries of the Site. State Regulatory Websites The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) "What's In My Neighborhood" Agricultural Interactive Mapping and the MPCA "What’s In My Neighborhood" websites were accessed to evaluate for regulatory listings at the Site, adjoining properties, or surrounding properties that would be of environmental concern but were not identified in the regulatory database report. Page 287 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 12 We did not identify facilities on the state regulatory websites we accessed that were not already listed in the ERIS report discussed in Section 4.2. County Information Additional relevant environmental information was requested from Dakota County via email dated August 19, 2025. Mr. Terry Muller, Dakota County, Environmental Resources Department responded via email on August 26, 2025. Mr. Muller indicates there are multiple wells on the property near the farmstead (north portion of Site). A map was provided depicting natural gas pipelines that intersect the site from the northeast portion to the south-southwest portion of the Site. Mr. Muller sent additional information via email on August 27, 2025. Mr. Muller indicated Wes Rutelonis, Dakota County Well Inspector, reviewed any previous audits, historic plat maps, sanborns, historic aerial photography, well construction records, well sealing records and/or well disclosure statements that Dakota County has available for 4752 220th Street W., Farmington (tax pin 130010002012). There is record of seven wells on the property, only one has a record of being sealed. Below are the wells identified at the Site, a map is provided in Appendix F. Unique Number Status Year drilled Description 608179 sealed 1997 4 inch drinking water well 410934 not sealed 1985 4 inch drinking water well 207519 in-use 1969 12 inch irrigation well W05649 not sealed Unknown 1.25 inch drinking water well from 4758 220th Street W05650 not sealed Unknown 1.25 inch drinking water well from 4752 220th Street W05651 not sealed Unknown 1.25 inch drinking water well from 4746 220th Street W05999 not sealed Unknown 6 inch agricultural well City Information Braun Intertec requested Site-specific information of environmental relevance from the City of Farmington and Eureka Township. The responses are discussed below, and copies of relevant information are provided in Appendix F. Eureka Township Clerk The town clerk was contact via email on August 19, 2025. Liz Atwater responded via email on August 28, 2025. A residence was formerly located at 4758 220th Street W., which was west of the main farmhouse. The residence was razed in November of 2018. Page 288 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 13 City of Farmington Building Inspections Matt Olson, Building Inspector, was contacted via email on August 19, 2025. Braun Intertec has not received a response to date, but will notify the User upon receiving information that would change the conclusions of this report. City of Farmington Planning & Zoning Jared Johnson, Planning Coordinator was contacted via email on August 19, 2025. Mr. Johnson responded via email on August 28, 2025. Mr. Johnson indicated the property is located within Eureka Township therefore the city does not have records. Mr. Johnson indicated city utilities are located within the intersection of Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W., the property could be serviced by the city if annexed into the City of Farmington. Well Databases The Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) maintains the Minnesota Well Index (MWI), which is a limited database of water well records. The MWI was accessed through the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) website. Not all private water wells are listed in that database. In addition, the MDH maintains a database of water well records disclosed and registered during real estate property transactions, the Well Disclosure Certificate database, within their Well Management Section that may contain well records not listed in the MWI. Our review of the MWI database revealed the following water wells located on the Site, which were also identified in the records provided by Dakota County: Unique Well Number: 410934 Well Name: Adelmann Well Address: 4752 220th Street W., Farmington, MN Date Well Completed: 02/22/1985 Well Depth: 130 feet Well Use: Domestic Static Water Level: 15 feet Unique Well Number: 608179 Well Name: Adelman, Bill Well Address: 4758 220th Street W., Farmington, MN Date Well Completed: 12/12/1997 Well Depth: 120 feet Well Use: Domestic Static Water Level: 15 feet Page 289 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 14 4.2.6 Regulatory Agency File and Records Review The purpose of the regulatory file review is to obtain sufficient information to assist in determining if a REC, CREC, HREC, or a de minimis condition exists at the Site in connection with a regulatory report listing. Although the Site and an adjoining property were identified in the regulatory report, based on our review of the database listing(s), it is our opinion that a regulatory agency file and records review is not warranted due to factors that include the nature and regulatory status of the listing. 4.3 Historical Use Information Review The objective of compiling and analyzing historical property information is to develop a history of the previous uses of the Site, adjoining properties, and surrounding area, in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the Site. The following table summarizes the historical information reviewed. Details regarding the information reviewed are provided in the sections below. Historical Source Provided By Years Available Fire Insurance Maps ERIS No coverage Topographic Maps ERIS 1957, 1974, 1993, 2013, 2016, 2019, and 2022 Aerial Photographs ERIS 1937, 1940, 1951, 1957, 1964, 1973, 1984, 1991, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, and 2023 City Directories ERIS 1996, 2000, 2003, 2008, 2011, 2016, 2020, and 2024 If relevant and useful, other on-line historical sources were reviewed and are cited in the subsections below. 4.3.1 Fire Insurance Maps Historical maps sometimes produced by private fire insurance map companies may be useful to indicate uses of the Site and nearby properties at specified dates. The information noted on the maps commonly includes uses of individual structures, locations of fuel and/or chemical storage tanks, and storage of other potentially toxic substances. According to ERIS, no fire insurance map coverage is available for the Site. A copy of the no coverage document is provided in Appendix G. 4.3.2 Topographic Maps Topographic maps provide a detailed record of a land area, giving geographic positions and elevations for both natural and man-made features such as pipelines, power lines, and many types of buildings. Maps published after 2009 typically do not include detail related to man-made features. Copies of the historical topographic maps are included in Appendix H. The following is a summary of the information reviewed. Page 290 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 15 Site Two structures are depicted along the north property line and the St. Paul and Pacific railroad intersects the southeast portion of the Site on the 1957 topographic maps. The topographic maps do not depict a railroad spur on the Site. The 1974 and 1993 maps indicate three residential structures and four farmstead related buildings are located in the north portion of the Site, the St. Paul and Pacific railroad intersects the southeast portion of the Site, and three natural gas pipelines transect the center of the site from north to south. Npote that available information, a total of four natural gas pipelines are located in this approximate location transecting the property, with two of the pipelines located in close proximity to one another in a side-by-side alignment. The 2013 to 2023 topographic maps only show topography, roads, waterways, and other similar features; therefore, buildings or areas of development are not depicted on these maps. By 2013 the railroad intersecting the southeast portion of the Site has been removed. Adjoining Properties A road (220th Street W) is depicted along the north property line on the 1957 to 2022 topographic maps. Residences are depicted beyond the road in the 1957 to 1993 maps. The 1974 to 1993 maps also depict a pipeline running to the north-northwest of the Site. A road (Denmark Ave) is depicted along the east property line with railroad tracks located beyond a section of land on the 1957 to 2022 topographic maps. Two structures are located between Denmark Avenue and the railroad tracks on the 1993 map. A road (225th Street West) is depicted along the south property line on the 1957 to 2022 topographic maps. Beyond the road, railroad tracks and a marshy area are depicted on the maps from 1957 to 1993. Pipelines are depicted running to the south-southwest of the Site on the 1974 to 1993 maps. A section of undeveloped land and the Vermillion River are located west of the Site on the 1957 to 2022 topographic maps. 4.3.3 Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs provide a visual record of land use and landcover conditions frequently dating back to the 1930s or 1940s. Copies of the aerial photographs are included in Appendix I. The following is a summary of the information reviewed. Site Beginning in the 1937 aerial photograph, the Site consist of a farmstead with multiple structures near the north central property line, railroad tracks intersect the southeast portion of the Site, a low lying area is noted in the southwest portion of the Site and the remaining portions of the Site are utilized as agricultural land. The aerial photographs do not depict a railroad spur on the Site. By the 1951 aerial photograph, the pipeline that transects the Site from the northeast portion to the south-southwest portion is apparent. In the 1984 aerial photograph it is apparent that an irrigation system is being utilized on the cropland and the railroad tracks in the southeast portion of the Site are no longer present. Page 291 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 16 The Site remains utilized for the same purposes through the 2023 aerial photograph. Adjoining Properties Beginning in the 1937 aerial photograph, a road (220th Street W.) is present along the north property line through the 2023 aerial photograph. Residences and/or small farmsteads with agricultural land located beyond the road are present in the 1937 to 2023 aerial photographs. In the 2023 aerial photograph beyond the residences, the area to the north of the northeast portion of the Site roads are developed in preparation of development. Beginning in the 1937 aerial photograph, a road (Denmark Avenue) is present along the east property line through the 2023 aerial photograph. Agricultural land (farmland and/or pasture land) and railroad tracks are present beyond the road in the 1937 to 1973 aerial photographs. By 1984, the railroad is no longer present and beyond a section of agricultural land the area is developed with a commercial structure and associated parking lot remaining unchanged through the 1991 aerial photograph. By 2003, the Church of St. Michael was developed east of the northeast portion of the Site beyond Denmark Avenue. South of the Church in the 2017 aerial photograph, a senior living facility was constructed and remains in the 2023 aerial photograph. Beginning in the 1937 aerial photograph, a road (225th Street W.) is present along the south property line through the 2023 aerial photograph. Agricultural land with low lying areas and railroad tracks are located south of the Site in the 1937 to 1964 aerial photographs. In 1964, a farmstead is present, south of the southeast corner of the Site beyond the road. The railroad tracks were no longer present in the 1984 aerial photograph. The area continued to be used for agriculture and maintained the farmstead through the 2023 aerial photograph. Farmland, undeveloped land and the Vermillion River are located west of the Site in the 1937 to 2023 aerial photographs. One exception is a residence was developed west of the northwest corner of the Site by 1984 and remains in the 2023 aerial photograph. 4.3.4 City Directories City directories provide a listing, by street address, of residents, businesses, organizations or institutions for the date of directory publication. The available city directory listings were reviewed to identify past occupants at the Site and surrounding area. City directories for 220th Street W., 225th Street W., and Denmark Ave. were reviewed. Copies of the city directories reviewed are provided in Appendix J. A summary of the relevant information is provided below. Site Street Address Year Occupant 4746 220th Street W (east residence) 2008 Chad Falls 4752 220th Street W (Site) 2000 - 2003 Bill & Audrey Adelmann 2008 - 2011 William Adelmann (vegetable/melon/soybean farm) 2016 - 2020 Audrey Adelmann Page 292 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 17 Adjoining Properties The surrounding properties were listed primarily as residential from 2000 to 2024 with the exception of St. Michaels Catholic Church was listed east of the Site from 2003 to 2024. 4.3.5 Previous Environmental Documents No previous environmental reports or documents containing relevant historical information were provided for our review. 4.3.6 Summary of Site History Based on the readily available historical information, by 1937 the Site consisted of a farmstead with multiple structures near the north central property line, railroad tracks intersected the southeast portion of the Site, a low lying area was noted in the southwest portion of the Site and the remaining portions of the Site was utilized as agricultural land. Based on historical aerial photographs and topographic maps, no railroad spur was located on the Site. At least one of the natural gas pipelines was present transecting the property by 1951. By 1984, it is apparent that the railroad tracks in the southeast portion of the Site are no longer present and an irrigation system was being utilized on the cropland and remains at the present date. A house was previously located at 4758 220th Street W. (west of current residences), was demolished in November of 2018. A barn once stood at center of the farmstead. The former occupants the Adelmann’s, did not have livestock at the facility. Instead, the barn was utilized to package potatoes for wholesale. The barn was razed in approximately 2015 however, the concrete slab remains. 4.3.7 Summary of Historical Information for Adjoining and Area Properties The Vermillion River is located west of the Site beyond a section of farmland. Roads bordered the Site to the north, south and east since prior to 1937 and remain at the present date. Railroad track extended to the northeast and southwest of the southeast portion of the Site since prior to 1937 through sometime in the 1970s as the tracks were taken out of service. Surrounding land use consisted primarily of agricultural land with occasional residences or farmsteads from at least 1937 up to the 1980s. As residential and commercial development began to the northwest of the Site. A church was developed to the east of the northeast corner of the Site by 2003. A senior living facility was constructed east of the Site between 2015 and 2017. An assumed residential development began north of the Site in 2024 or 2025. 5.0 Site Reconnaissance The objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain information and make observations to help indicate the likelihood of identifying RECs in connection with the Site. The Site Layout is presented on Figure 2 (Figures), and photographs of the Site are presented in Appendix K. Page 293 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 18 5.1 Observations, Methodology and Limiting Conditions Braun Intertec Environmental Professional, Danielle Stickler visited the Site on August 25, 2025. We were accompanied during the Site reconnaissance by Dale Severson, KW Commercial Midwest (real estate team). At the time, the weather was sunny with a temperature of about 66 degrees Fahrenheit. The Site reconnaissance was conducted by physically traversing and visually observing the exterior aspects of the Site and its improvements, as well the interior areas, such as mechanical, storage, maintenance, areas or other interior areas that were deemed representative of such Site improvements. Adjoining properties were visually observed from the Site boundaries or nearby public rights-of-way. 5.2 Site Observations 5.2.1 Site Description The Site consists of one parcel totaling 158.26 acres. The area along the north central property line is developed as a farmstead. The farmstead consists of two vacant residences, a detached garage, four farm- related outbuildings (a barn/workshop building, a metal storage building and two wood structures), a silo, concrete pads associated with a former barn and silo, an irrigation well, a potable water well and two septic systems. The residence at 4746 220th Street W. is a single story house with a partial basement. The residence at 4752 220th Street W. is a two-story house with a partial basement. Both residences are currently not heated and were previously heated via natural gas since at least 1933. The barn/workshop building is heated via natural gas on an as needed basis. The detached garage, metal storage building and the two wood structures are unheated. A total of four natural gas pipelines transect the central portion of the Site in a northeast-southwest alignment. The northeast portion of the Site is graded, crops were removed due to work on the natural gas pipelines which intersects the property from the northeast portion to the south- southwest portion of the Site. The remaining areas of the property are utilized for agricultural purposes. 5.2.2 Pits, Ponds, Pools of Liquid, or Lagoons No indications of pits, ponds, pools of liquid, or lagoons having the potential to contain hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed at the Site or on adjoining properties at the time of our reconnaissance. 5.2.3 Stained or Corroded Surfaces Minor stains were noted on the earth surface floor within the metal storage building. Thes staining in the metal storage building is considered a de minimis condition. Staining was noted on the concrete floor of the barn/workshop building where it is assumed farm related maintenance activities occurred. 5.2.4 Solid Waste Disposal At the time of the reconnaissance, no indications of waste disposal areas, fill, mounds, depressions, burn pits or disturbed areas were observed that were suggestive of the presence of buried debris or other solid waste disposal. Page 294 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 19 5.2.5 Stressed Vegetation No areas of stressed, discolored, stained or dead vegetation beyond what would be expected due to seasonal conditions were observed at the time of the Site reconnaissance. 5.2.6 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products At the time of the reconnaissance, the following was noted within the barn/workshop: ▪ Nine 1 to 5-gallon gas can containers ▪ Two 5-gallon diesel cans ▪ One 1-gallon container of lubrication oil ▪ One 55 gallon drum of motor oil ▪ One Parts washing station 5.2.7 Storage Tanks No indications of storage tanks were noted at the Site at the time of the reconnaissance. 5.2.8 Drums and Unidentified Substance Containers Empty 55-gallon drums were noted at the Site; two in the barn/workshop building; one on the exterior of the barn/workshop building; and one within the east wood structure. Signs of staining or dumping was not noted in these areas. 5.2.9 Odors No strong, pungent, or noxious odors were noted at the time of the Site reconnaissance. 5.2.10 Potential PCB-Containing Electrical and Hydraulic Equipment Pole-mounted electrical transformers and power lines were noted along the north property boundary of the Site along 220th Street W. The transformers appeared to be in good condition with no indications of leaking or staining. 5.2.11 Wastewater Discharges No process wastewater was observed during the Site reconnaissance. 5.2.12 Sewage Disposal System According to the Site owner, Ms. Adelmann and visual observations during the Site reconnaissance, the Site is currently serviced by two septic systems. One septic system located northeast of the residence identified as 4746 220th Street W. and the second is located southwest of the residence identified as 4752 220th Street W. Page 295 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 20 Mr. Johnson, City of Farmington Planning Coordinator, indicated city utilities are located within the intersection of Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W. (northeast corner of the Site), the property could be serviced by the city if annexed into the City of Farmington. 5.2.13 Wells One irrigation well was observed located south of the easternmost buildings in the north portion of the Site and one residential well is located south of the main farmhouse identified as 4752 220th Street West. 5.2.14 Potable Water Supply According to the Site owner, Ms. Adelmann and visual observations during the Site reconnaissance, one residential well is located south of the main farmhouse identified as 4752 220th Street W., this well reportedly services both residences and an irrigation well is located south the northeast buildings at the Site. Mr. Johnson, City of Farmington Planning Coordinator, indicated city utilities are located within the intersection of Denmark Avenue and 220th Street W. (northeast corner of the Site), the property could be serviced by the city if annexed into the City of Farmington. 5.2.15 Additional On-Site Observations Markers for a northeast to south-southwest aligned gas pipeline were observed near the south boundary of the Site parallel with 225th Street West. 5.3 Current and Past Use of Adjoining Properties and Surrounding Area The area reconnaissance was performed to assist in determining whether land use on the adjacent or nearby properties may have features, activities, uses, or conditions that indicate the presence of RECs. The area was toured by foot and automobile from public rights-of-way. The properties surrounding the Site are as follows: Direction Property Use North 220th Street W. with an area that is being developed located beyond South 225th Street W. with agricultural land located beyond East Denmark Avenue with the Church of St. Michael, a senior living facility, residences and Dakota Electric Association located beyond West A residence and undeveloped areas along the Vermillion River located beyond No obvious indications of environmental concern were noted on adjoining properties at the time of the reconnaissance, based on our limited observations from the public right of way. 6.0 Interviews The objective of interviews is to obtain information indicating RECs in connection with the Site. Interviews with past and present owners, operators, and occupants of the property, consisted of questions asked in an attempt to obtain information about current and past uses and conditions of the Site. Page 296 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 21 6.1 Site Representatives Ms. Nancy Adelmann, current owner, and Mr. Dale Severson, CREST Commercial Real Estate, acted as the Site owner Representatives. Ms. Adelman and Mr. Severson were interviewed via email with inquiries sent on August 25, 2025 and responses provided on August 27, 2025 and November 3, 2025. Ms. Adelmann and Mr. Severson indicated the house located at 4746 220th Street W. (east residence) is a single story, 500 square foot structure with a partial basement, constructed over 100 years ago. The home is not currently connected to a heating source, the home was previously heated via natural gas which was provided to the residence in 1933. Ms. Adelmann indicated a fuel oil tank is not present in the basement. Ms. Adelmann indicated that the house located at 4752 (AKA 4764) 220th Street W. (main farmhouse, west residence) is a two story, 2,600 square foot structure with a partial basement constructed over 100 year ago. The home was previously heated via natural gas which is no longer connected. Natural gas was available to the residence in 1933. A fuel oil tank is not present at the residence. The detached garage was constructed in approximately 1975 and has a concrete floor. Ms. Adelmann indicated that no hazardous substances are stored at the residence. One well services the two residences. Each residence has a separate septic system. A house was previously located at 4758 220th Street W.(west of main farmhouse). According to Ms. Adelmann, this residence was demolished in 2019, demolition debris was removed by the contractor. The residence was previously heated via natural gas. Ms. Adelmann indicated the last time live animals (farm operations) were kept on the property was before 1956 by the previous owners. The barn building has been utilized as a workshop and tractor storage. The building was utilized for light maintenance of equipment. Major farm equipment repairs were completed off Site. The barn was occasionally heated via natural gas as needed. Ms. Adelmann indicated the metal storage building is utilized for storage of farm equipment. The individuals who lease the farmland store their farm equipment within the building. The building is not heated and equipment maintenance is not completed within the space. Ms. Adelmann indicated the two wood structures located east of the dwellings are used for storage purposes. The previous use of the buildings is unknown. South of the southern wooded storage building is the irrigation system panel, associated water well and jet pump that is owned by Adelmann Farm. Ms. Adelman stated that a corn crib was dismantled and buried at the Site approximately 40 years ago. The corn crib was initially described by the Site owner representatives as a barn; however, upon further discussion it was clarified that the structure was a corn crib. The corn crib building materials were reportedly buried east of the metal storage building. 6.2 Site Occupants The Site is not currently occupied by tenants. Page 297 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 22 6.3 Local Government Officials Braun Intertec contacted representatives of local government agencies to obtain information relevant to the identification of RECs on the Site. We did not interview local government officials in person; however we submitted written requests for information via letter or electronic media; information obtained from the inquiry is provided in Section 4.2.5 of this report. 6.4 Others No additional people were interviewed as part of the assessment. 7.0 Data Gaps Data gaps, which result from a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts, may include limiting conditions such as client imposed constraints; physical obstructions that may have limited observations of the Site or surrounding area; physical constraints such as snow, rain or other weather conditions; and data failures which result from a failure to achieve the historical research objectives of developing a history of the previous uses of the Site, adjoining properties, and surrounding area. No data gaps were identified as part of this Phase I ESA with the exception of the following: ▪ Observation of some areas of the Site was limited due to dense vegetation and tall crop vegetation. ▪ Responses to all our inquiries to local government offices and/or officials were not received prior to issuance of the assessment. ▪ Direct access to portions of the Site was not available. Access was not provided to the residences or the detached garage. ▪ The User did not provide information to evaluate the presence of environmental liens filed against the Site. The identified data gaps did not affect the EP’s ability to render opinions regarding conditions indicative of a release or threatened release and are unlikely to alter the report findings. 8.0 Findings and Opinions According to the User, the Phase I ESA was conducted in association with the purchase and redevelopment of the Site. Opinions expressed herein are influenced by the stated reason for conducting the Phase I ESA. Page 298 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 23 Furthermore, the expressed opinions might not be applicable to alternate reasons for reliance on the content of the Phase I ESA. The findings include identified features, activities, uses, and conditions that may indicate the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products at the Site; and include a discussion of significant data gaps, if any. The following findings are based on the results of our assessment: ▪ Information regarding the Site was available back to 1937. The information indicates that the majority of the Site (less the north farmstead area) was developed at the time with apparent cultivated agricultural land. Based on available information and local experience, it is reasonable to assume that the first developed use of the Site was for cultivated agricultural land. This historical agricultural activity likely included the use of beneficial agricultural products such as pesticide, herbicide, and/or fertilizer substances. However, it is important to note that the legal application (i.e., in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications and customary practices) of such substances, in the course of standard operational practice does not constitute a “release to the environment” by definition. Further, no reasonably ascertainable information was obtained during the course of our assessment, including historical and regulatory records review, Site reconnaissance observations, and interviews indicating that a past release had occurred. Thus, the mere presence of agricultural land use does not meet the definition of a REC. ▪ The Site is listed on the Clandestine Drug Labs (CDL), Facility Registry Service/Facility Index (FINDS/FRS), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Agency Interest (AI), and National Clandestine Drug Labs (NCDL) databases. The Methamphetamine Laboratory Program at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) works to protect human health by providing technical advice on the remediation of clandestine methamphetamine production laboratories (meth labs) and decontamination of property exposed to meth lab activities. Identification on these regulatory database listings indicates that the facility was identified as a potential methamphetamine production laboratory and does not imply that a release has occurred. According to available information, the incident response activities were conducted in 2004. Eureka Township records indicate this residences was razed in November of 2018. During an interview with the Adelmann Farm representative in 2022 for an adjoining development, it was reported that the 4758 residence was inspected upon tenant removal by Dakota County personnel, who determined that residue present within the premises was consistent with that of heavy nicotine/tobacco use, rather than methamphetamine production. Therefore, it is our opinion that the listing of the Site on the regulatory databases is not a REC. ▪ Dakota County representatives identified records for seven wells in the north portion of the Site. One of the reported wells has record of being sealed, the others are identified as in-use or not sealed. During the Site reconnaissance, only two wells were observed. No evidence of releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed in the vicinity of the two water wells observed during the Site reconnaissance. ▪ The St. Paul and Pacific railroad intersected the southeast portion of the Site from at least 1937 until sometime in the 1970s. This was a pass-through area for the tracks, trains did not stop or transition in this area, and this portion of the Site has been cultivated cropland since the tracks were taken out of service and removed. The former presence of railroad tracks transecting the Site is not a REC. Page 299 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 24 ▪ Natural gas pipelines have intersected the Site from the northeast portion to the south-southwest portion since prior to 1951 and remain that the present date. A total of four natural gas pipelines are present at the Site. We identified no reported releases from the petroleum pipeline on or in close vicinity of the Site. If releases were to occur then the owner and operator of the pipeline would be responsible for cleanup and other regulatory obligations. It is our opinion that the presence of the pipelines is not a REC for the Site. ▪ Two septic systems are present adjacent to the residence located in the north portion of the Site. Low concentrations of polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) compounds, including perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), are present in many household products; therefore, there is a potential that small quantities of PFAS compounds may have been discharged to the subsurface via the septic system. It is our opinion that the potential release of small quantities of PFOS and PFOA from the residential septic system represents a de minimis condition in connection with the Site. ▪ Stains were noted on the concrete floor of the barn/workshop building where it is assumed farm- related maintenance activities occurred. Petroleum products (machinery related maintenance products) and a part washing station were observed within the barn/workshop building. The Site has been used for cultivate agricultural purposes and developed with farmstead buildings for at least 90 years. Based on the use and storage or petroleum products and hazardous substances over an extended period of time, the potential for the historical releases of hazardous materials or petroleum products to the subsurface at the Site is a REC. ▪ According to information provided by the Site owner, a corn crib was dismantled and buried at the Site approximately 40 years ago. The corn crib building materials were reportedly buried east of the metal storage building. The buried building debris at the Site reported by the owner is a REC. ▪ Several regulated facilities were identified on adjoining properties and in the surrounding area. Based on our review of available information, including the nature of the regulatory database listings, regulatory status, distance from the Site, and position of the facilities relative to the published groundwater flow direction, it is our opinion that the identified regulatory database listings for these facilities are not RECs for the Site. 9.0 Conclusions Braun Intertec has performed a Phase I ESA of the Site in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E1527-21, of the Adelmann 160 located at 4752 220th Street W., Farmington, MN. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.4. This assessment has revealed the following REC in connection with the Site. Page 300 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 25 Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) ▪ Stains were noted on the concrete floor of the barn/workshop building where it is assumed farm- related maintenance activities occurred. Petroleum products (machinery related maintenance products) and a part washing station were observed within the barn/workshop building. The Site has been used for cultivate agricultural purposes and developed with farmstead buildings for at least 90 years. Based on the use and storage or petroleum products and hazardous substances over an extended period of time, the potential for the historical releases of hazardous materials or petroleum products to the subsurface at the Site is a REC. ▪ According to information provided by the Site owner, a corn crib was dismantled and buried at the Site approximately 40 years ago. The corn crib building materials were reportedly buried east of the metal storage building. The buried building debris at the Site reported by the owner is a REC. Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) This assessment identified no CRECs in connection with the Site. Significant Data Gaps This assessment did not identify significant data gaps that affected our ability to identify the presence of RECs in connection with the Site. 10.0 Environmental Professional Statement We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Site. We have developed and performed the AAI in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Qualifications of the environmental professional and personnel who completed the ESA are presented in Appendix L. Sincerely, Braun Intertec Corporation Nikki M. Rhodes Project Scientist Brandon M. Brayfield, PG Supervisor, Senior Scientist Page 301 of 454 Figures Figure 1: Site Location Figure 2: Site Layout Page 302 of 454 Last Modified: Checked By: Date Drawn: Drawn By: Image Source: USGS US Topo Map Drawing No: Fig1_SiteLocation Project No: B2507386 8/20/2025 F:\2025\B2507386\GIS\B2507386\B2507386.aprx SCALE: 1" = 2,000' 0 2,0001,000 ' o Approximate Site Location Figure 1 Site Location Map Farmington, Minnesota 4752 220th Street W. Adelman 160 NR 8/20/2025 ZS2309 Palace Street La Crosse, WI 54603 608.781.7277 braunintertec.com Page 303 of 454 Hickory StHickory St E s s e x A v e Es s e x A v e De n m a r k A v e De n m a r k A v e Ash StAsh St 225th St W225th St W ")74 ")31 Last ModiIied Checked By Date DraZn DraZn By ImaJe Source GooJle Earth DraZinJ No FiJ2BSiteLayout ProMect No B25736 /12/225 F ?225?B25736?GIS?B25736?B25736aprx SCALE 1 4 N FiJure 2 Site Layout 23 Palace Street La Crosse WI 5463 6717277 Erauninterteccom FarminJton Minnesota 4752 22th Street W Adelman 16 NR /2/225 =S Ash StAsh St STORAGE BUILDING IRRIGATION SYSTEM PANEL AND ASSOCIATED WATER WELL WITH JET PUMP STORAGE BUILDING FORMER SILOS SILODETACHED GARAGE LESTER STORAGE BUILDING BARN/ WORK SHOP FORMER BARN/ CONCRETE PAD REMAINS HOUSE 4752 (AKA 4764) HOUSE 4746 SEPTIC SYSTEM SEPTIC SYSTEM WATER WELL Approximate Reported Area of Buried Building Debris Page 304 of 454 APPENDIX E Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Page 305 of 454 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report Adelman Property 4752 220th St W Farmington, Minnesota Prepared for U.S. Home, LLC Braun Intertec Corporation Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Page 306 of 454 December 5, 2025 Project B2507386.02 Jacob Champeau U.S. Home, LLC 16305 36th Avenue North, Suite 100 Plymouth, MN 55442 Re: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Adelman Property 4752 220th St W Farmington, Minnesota Dear Mr. Champeau: On behalf of U.S. Home, LLC, Braun Intertec Corporation (Braun Intertec) conducted a Phase II Site Environmental Assessment (ESA) of the above-referenced site (Site) in accordance with the authorized scope of services described in our proposal dated October 14, 2025. The Phase II ESA was prepared in association the proposed acquisition and redevelopment of the Site. For a complete discussion of our assessment, please refer to the attached Phase II ESA report. The objective of the Phase II ESA was to investigate the recognized environmental conditions (RECs) discovered during the recently conducted Phase I ESA. This Phase II ESA was prepared on behalf of and for use by U.S. Home, LLC. No other party has a right to rely on the contents of this Phase II ESA without the written authorization of Braun Intertec. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our professional services to you for this project. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the project in general, please contact Brandon Brayfield at 218.310.6362 or bbrayfield@braunintertec.com. Sincerely, Braun Intertec Corporation Charles S. Kiel Staff Scientist Brandon M. Brayfield, PG Supervisor, Senior Scientist Page 307 of 454 Braun Intertec Page i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Authorization ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Objective .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Site Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Site Location and Description ........................................................................................... 1 2.2 Proposed Development .................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Previous Site Investigations............................................................................................... 2 2.4 Published Geologic Information ........................................................................................ 3 2.4.1 Topography ................................................................................................................ 3 2.4.2 Geology ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.4.3 Hydrogeology ............................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Scope of Services ................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Deviations from Work Plan/Proposal ................................................................................. 4 4.0 Investigation Methods and Procedures .................................................................................... 5 4.1 Soil Evaluation ................................................................................................................. 5 4.1.1 Hand Auger Borings .................................................................................................... 5 4.1.2 Test Pits ..................................................................................................................... 5 4.1.3 Soil Classification and Monitoring ............................................................................... 6 4.1.4 Soil Analyses .............................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Soil Vapor Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 6 4.2.1 Sub-Slab Vapor Points ................................................................................................ 6 5.0 Investigation Results .............................................................................................................. 7 5.1 Geologic Conditions ......................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Field Screening ................................................................................................................ 7 5.3 Soil Analytical Results ...................................................................................................... 7 5.4 Soil Vapor Analytical Results ............................................................................................. 8 5.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control .................................................................................... 9 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ....................................................................................... 9 7.0 Assessment Limitations ....................................................................................................... 10 Figures 1: Site Location Map 2: Sample Location Map Tables 1: Soil Analytical Results 2: Soil Vapor Analytical Results Appendix A. Proposed Redevelopment Concept Plan Page 308 of 454 Table of Contents (Continued) Braun Intertec Page ii Appendix B. Photographic Documentation Appendix C. Appendix D. Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix E. Standard Operating Procedures Appendix F. References/Bibliography Page 309 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Authorization Braun Intertec received authorization from Mr. Joe Jablonski of U.S. Home, LLC to conduct a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Adelman property located at 4752 220th St W in Farmington, Minnesota (Site), in accordance with the scope of services described in the Braun Intertec proposal dated October 14, 2025. The Phase II ESA was prepared in association with the proposed acquisition and redevelopment of the Site. This Phase II ESA was prepared on behalf of and for use by U.S. Home, LLC in accordance with the contract between U.S. Home, LLC and Braun Intertec. No other party has a right to rely on the contents of this Phase II ESA without the written authorization of Braun Intertec. The Phase II ESA was limited in that groundwater conditions were not evaluated as part of the investigation activities. 1.2 Project Objective The objective of the Phase II ESA was to investigate the recognized environmental conditions (RECs) discovered during the recently conducted Phase I ESA. 2.0 Site Background 2.1 Site Location and Description The Site is located at 4752 220th Street West, Farmington, Minnesota (see Figure 1) and consists of one parcel described as Dakota County PID 13-00100-02-012. The Site is located within the NW quarter of the NE quarter of Section 01, Township 113 North, Range 20 West, in the city of Farmington, Dakota County, Minnesota. The Site consists of one parcel totaling 158.26 acres. The area along the north central property line is developed as a farmstead. The farmstead consists of two vacant residences, a detached garage, four farm- related outbuildings (a barn/workshop building, a metal storage building and two wood structures), a silo, concrete pads associated with a former barn and silo, an irrigation well, a potable water well and two septic systems. The residence at 4746 220th Street W. is a single story house with a partial basement. The residence at 4752 220th Street W. is a two-story house with a partial basement. Both residences are currently not heated and were previously heated via natural gas since at least 1933. The barn/workshop building is heated via natural gas on an as needed basis. The detached garage, storage building and the two wood structures are unheated. The northeast portion of the Site is graded, crops were removed due to work on the natural gas pipeline which intersects the property from the northeast portion to the south-southwest portion of the Site. The remaining areas of the property are utilized for agricultural purposes. Page 310 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 2 By 1937 the Site consisted of a farmstead with multiple structures near the north central property line, railroad tracks intersected the southeast portion of the Site, a low lying area was noted in the southwest portion of the Site and the remaining portions of the Site was utilized as agricultural land. By 1951, the gas pipeline that intersects the property from the northeast portion to the south-southwest portion is present. By 1984, it is apparent that the railroad tracks in the southeast portion of the Site are no longer present and an irrigation system was being utilized on the cropland and remained at the present date. A house was previously located at 4758 220th Street W. (west of current residences), was demolished in November of 2018. A barn once stood at center of the farmstead. The former occupants the Adelmann’s, did not have livestock at the facility. Instead, the barn was utilized to package potatoes for wholesale. The barn was razed in approximately 2015 however, the concrete slab remains. The Site is bordered on the north by 220th Street W. with an area that was being developed located beyond; on the east by Denmark Avenue with the Church of St. Michael, a senior living facility, residences and Dakota Electric Association located beyond; on the south by 225th Street W. with agricultural land located beyond; and the west by a residence with undeveloped areas along the Vermillion River located beyond. A Site Location Map is included as Figure 1. 2.2 Proposed Development The client is considering acquisition and redevelopment of the Site into residential housing. The proposed development also includes paved roadways, stormwater management features, and green space. The proposed conceptual development plan is included in Appendix A. 2.3 Previous Site Investigations Braun Intertec conducted a Phase I ESA at the Site in September 2025, the results of which are presented I the report entitled: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Adelman Property, 4752 220th Street W, Farmington, Minnesota, prepared by Braun Intertec, Project B2507386 dated December 5, 2025 Phase I ESA). The Phase I identified the following recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site: ▪ Stains were noted on the concrete floor of the barn/workshop building where it is assumed farm- related maintenance activities occurred. Petroleum products (machinery related maintenance products) and a part washing station were observed within the barn/workshop building. The Site has been used for cultivated agricultural purposes and developed with farmstead buildings for at least 90 years. Based on the use and storage or petroleum products and hazardous substances over an extended period of time, the potential for the historical releases of hazardous materials or petroleum products to the subsurface at the Site is a REC. ▪ According to information provided by the Site owner, a corn crib was dismantled and buried at the Site approximately 40 years ago. The corn crib building materials were reportedly buried east of the metal storage building. The buried building debris at the Site reported by the owner is a REC. Page 311 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 3 2.4 Published Geologic Information 2.4.1 Topography According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute quadrangle for Farmington, MN, the Site is located at an elevation of approximately 919 feet above mean sea level. The area generally slopes to the north-northeast toward the Vermillion River. 2.4.2 Geology The surficial geology in the vicinity of the Site consists of undifferentiated New Ulm Formation, sand and gravel—stratified sand and gravel deposited by subaerial meltwater carrying sediment dominantly from the Des Moines lobe. Sand ranges from coarse- to fine-grained and is poorly to well-sorted. Generally dark yellowish-brown where oxidized and light olive-brown where less oxidized. Leaching observed up to 7 feet in places. Fast moving, sediment-laden meltwater of the Des Moines lobe cut and re-activated existing channels through the St. Croix moraine and pre-Late Pleistocene deposits, flowing generally southeast and east and covering wide swaths of the county. These channels were perhaps initially formed by meltwater of the Superior lobe during retreat, or as tunnel valleys during active deposition of the St. Croix moraine. The Des Moines-lobe meltwater likely flowed preferentially across these low areas or weakly compacted material in the moraine that eroded easily. Pattern indicates areas of pitting within the unit. Units may incorporate older sediment where meltwater scoured underlying material, primarily outwash of the Superior lobe, averaging 6 percent reds in the coarse-grained grain fraction. Shale percentage averages 4 percent. The unit is generally thick, approximately 50 to greater than 200 feet, especially where deep bedrock valleys underlie the glacial sediment. Multiple phases of downcutting are preserved by scarps within this unit (Gowan, Stanley, 2023). The bedrock geology in the vicinity of the Site consist of Shakopee Formation, a heterolithic unit composed of tan- to orangish-brown dolostone, sandy dolostone, sandstone, and shale. It may contain oolites, intraclasts, fossilized microbial mats (stromatolites), and chert nodules. Thickness of the Shakopee Formation beneath the St. Peter Sandstone varies across the county ranging from 80 feet to slightly over 200 feet (24 to 70 meters). It is thickest along and east of the Hudson–Afton horst. The Shakopee Formation thins on the west side of the Hudson–Afton horst and farther northwest into the Twin Cities basin. There are two members of the Shakopee Formation recognized in Minnesota, the Willow River and the New Richmond Members. The New Richmond Member is the lower part of the Shakopee Formation and is composed of fine- to mediumgrained quartz sandstone as well as oolitic sandy dolostone. It is generally less than 10 feet (3 meters) thick in Dakota County and can be difficult to discern from the overlying Willow River Member (Squillace, 1979) (Steenberg, 2023). 2.4.3 Hydrogeology The depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the Site is expected to lie within 15 feet below land surface. According to published geologic information, the regional groundwater flow direction within the unconsolidated deposits in the Site vicinity is generally to the northeast. However, the local direction of groundwater flow may be affected by nearby streams, lakes, wells, and/or wetlands and may vary seasonally. Page 312 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 4 The Site-specific groundwater flow direction was not determined through direct measurement during this Phase II ESA. Additional field investigation, beyond the Scope of Services of this Phase II ESA, would be required to determine this information. 3.0 Scope of Services The following tasks were conducted at the Site as part of this Phase II ESA: ▪ Subcontracted a excavation contrator to clear public utilities through Gopher State One Call and private utilities for the investigation locations, and complete test pits. ▪ Advanced 15 test pits (TP-1 through TP-15). ▪ Collected sub-slab soil vapor samples in two locations, which were designated SSV-1 and SSV-2. One near the location of the parts washer, the other near the area where staining was observed near the storage of petroleum. ▪ Advanced two hand auger borings at two locations, which were designated HA-1 and HA-2. One near the location of the reported primary use area for the parts washer, the other near the area where staining was observed near the storage of petroleum. ▪ Conducted environmental monitoring during the test pits and hand augers and screened soil samples collected from the test pits and hand augers for the presence of organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID). Visual and olfactory observations regarding potential contamination were also made and recorded. ▪ Analyzed representative samples of soil for the following parameters: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs ), Diesel range organics (DRO), and Eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals. ▪ Analyzed soil vapor samples for VOCs. ▪ Evaluated the data and prepared this report. 3.1 Deviations from Work Plan/Proposal The proposed Phase II ESA scope included analytical soil testing from test pits where debris was observed. No debris, or other visual or olfactory observations were observed within the test pits (see Section 5.2). Therefore, no soil samples were collected from test pits for laboratory analysis. Page 313 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 5 4.0 Investigation Methods and Procedures The field work relating to the investigation was conducted between October 31, 2025, and November 10, 2025. Prior to beginning the field investigation, public utilities were cleared through Gopher State One Call and private utilities were cleared through a subcontracted private utility locator. Field methods and results are discussed in the following sections. Photographic documentation is provided in Appendix B, hand auger boring and test pit logs are provided in Appendix C, laboratory analytical report(s) is (are) provided in Appendix D, and Braun Intertec Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are provided in Appendix E. 15 test pits (designated as TP-1 through TP-15), two hand auger borings (designated as HA-1 and HA-2) and two sub-slab vapor samples (designated as SSV-1 and SSV-2) were advanced at the Site. ▪ Test Pits TP -1 through TP-15 were advanced to depths of 10 feet bgs at the Site in the area of the reported buried corn crib debris, east of the storage building. ▪ Hand auger boring HA-1 was advanced to a depth of 4 feet bgs near the reported primary use location for the parts washer, and HA-2 was advanced to a depth of 4 feet 5 inches near the petroleum product storage. ▪ Sub-slab vapor sample SSV-1 was sampled in the reported primary use location for the parts washer and sub-slab vapor sample SSV-2 was sampled near the petroleum product storage. The test pits, hand auger borings, and sub-slab soil vapor samples are shown on Figure 2. The locations of the test pits completed outside of the building were determined using GPS technology. SOPs for the investigation are included in Appendix E. 4.1 Soil Evaluation 4.1.1 Hand Auger Borings Two hand auger borings, designated HA-1 and HA-2, were advanced at the Site within the barn/workshop. Hand auger HA-1 was advanced near the reported primary use location for the parts washer. Hand auger HA-2 was advanced near the storage of petroleum products. A hand-driven bucket auger was used to advance hand auger boring HA-1 to a depth of 48 inches, and HA-2 to a depth of 53 inches. 4.1.2 Test Pits Braun Intertec subcontracted Kamish Excavating, South St. Paul, Minnesota to advance 15 test pits, designated as TP-1 through TP-15 at the Site to depths ranging from 5 to 10 feet bgs. The test pits were excavated using a track -mounted backhoe and measured approximately 3 feet wide by 6 feet long. During excavation, soil samples were collected at approximately 2-foot intervals. Upon completion, each test pit/trench was backfilled and compacted with spoils from the excavation in the approximate order that the material was removed. Page 314 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 6 4.1.3 Soil Classification and Monitoring Soils samples from the hand auger borings and test pits were visually and manually classified in the field by an environmental technician using ASTM D 2487 “Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)” and ASTM D 2488 “Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures)”. Additionally, soils were classified at the Braun Intertec soils laboratory by a geotechnical engineer using ASTM D 2487 and ASTM D 2488. Soil samples retrieved were examined by an environmental technician for unusual staining, odors, and other apparent signs of contamination. In addition, the soil samples were screened for the presence of organic vapors using a PID. The PID was equipped with a 10.6 electron volt lamp and calibrated to an isobutylene standard. The PID was used to perform direct measurement and a headspace method of field analyses in accordance with Braun Intertec SOPs and the MPCA recommended procedures. 4.1.4 Soil Analyses Selected soil samples were collected from the hand auger borings for laboratory analysis as identified in the following table. Samples were submitted to Pace Analytical Services (Pace) in Minneapolis, Minnesota and analyzed for the parameters summarized in the following table. Soil Boring/Test Pit/Hand Auger Sample Name Sampling Depth (feet bgs) Rationale Analytical Parameters HA-1 0-1 Shallow soil in the area of the parts washer. VOCs, DRO, PAHs, and 8 RCRA metals HA-2 0-1 Shallow soil in the area of the petroleum product storage. VOCs, DRO, PAHs, and 8 RCRA metals 4.2 Soil Vapor Evaluation 4.2.1 Sub-Slab Vapor Points Two sub -slab vapor sampling points (SSV-1 and SSV-2) were installed in the concrete slab of the barn/workshop. Installation and sampling procedures were in general accordance with Appendix B of the MPCA 2020 Vapor Investigation Guidance. As part of the installation, a hole was drilled through the concrete floor slab, and an air-tight temporary soil vapor point connected to inert shut-in test tubing assembly was installed. The other end of the shut-in test assembly was connected to the valve and gauge assembly connected to the air canister. A water dam leak test and shut-in test were successfully performed verifying that there were no leaks in the sample train. The sampling point and tubing were purged to remove at least two volumes of air prior to sample collection. The soil vapor samples were then collected using laboratory- supplied negative pressure air-sample collection canisters) equipped with 200 milliliter per minute (mL/min) flow restrictors. The shut-in test assembly was disconnected. Following sampling, organic vapor Page 315 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 7 concentrations at the vapor pin were screened with a PID and the value was recorded. The temporary sampling point was removed from the borehole and the borehole was patched with concrete. The sub -slab vapor samples were submitted to Pace National Laboratory in Mount Juliet, Tennessee and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method TO 15. 5.0 Investigation Results 5.1 Geologic Conditions Test pit and hand auger boring logs and with descriptions of the various soil strata encountered during the soil boring operations and water level information are contained in Appendix C The depths shown as changes between the soil types are approximate. The actual changes may be transitional, and the transition depths are likely to be horizontally variable. Soils, consisting primarily of poorly graded sand with silt and clayey sand were encountered from the ground surface to depths of 4 feet bgs in the hand auger borings. Fill soils consisting of silty sand and clayey sand were encountered in test pits TP-1 through TP-3 from the ground surface to depths of 3 feet bgs. Topsoil consisting of silty sand was encountered in test pits TP-4 through TP-15 from the ground surface to depths of 1 feet bgs. Underlying the topsoil and fills soils, apparent native soil was observed consisting of poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand with silt and clayey sand to depths up to10 feet bgs. 5.2 Field Screening Soil recovered from the test pits and hand auger borings were screened by the field technician for evidence of contamination, including odors, staining, and the presence of debris. No odors, staining, or debris were observed in the soils recovered from any of the test pits or hand auger borings. Organic vapor/PID readings were recorded for soil samples collected from each test pit and hand auger boring. Observed organic vapor concentrations ranged from 0.0 to 1.6 parts per million (ppm), which are considered to be general background readings. 5.3 Soil Analytical Results This section provides a discussion of soil analytical results. A summary of the soil analytical results is provided in Table 1. The complete laboratory reports with chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix D. The soil analytical results can be compared with the SRVs, Background Threshold Values (BTVs), and Screening Soil Leaching Values (SLVs), which are also listed on Table 1. The SRVs and SLVs are allowable risk- based contaminant concentrations derived by the MPCA using risk assessment methodology, modeling, and risk management policy to guide investigation and cleanup actions. SRVs relate to direct-contact exposure scenarios and SLVs relate to potential leaching of contaminants to groundwater. BTVs were established by the MPCA based on an estimate of state-wide natural background concentrations for inorganics and ambient Page 316 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 8 background concentrations for organics. BTVs are used in instances where the MPCA calculated a health- based SRV that is below estimated background values (MPCA guidance document c-r1-05, April 2021). Concentrations of contaminants in soil, SRVs, BTVs (where applicable), and SLVs are expressed in units of milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The following provides a summary of the soil analytical results. ▪ No VOCs were detected at concentrations greater than or equal to the laboratory reporting limits. ▪ Varying concentrations of PAH s were detected in the soil sample collected from hand auger boring HA-2. The concentrations of the detected PAH s were below the applicable regulatory standards. ▪ DRO was detected in soil sample HA-1 (0-1') at a concentration of 13.2 mg/kg, which is below the MPCA unregulated fill criterion of 100 mg/kg. DRO was not detected in the soil sample collected from hand auger boring HA-1. ▪ Varying concentrations of the eight RCRA metals were detected in both of the soil samples analyzed. However, none of the metal concentrations exceeded the respective Residential/Recreational SRVs and SLVs. 5.4 Soil Vapor Analytical Results This section provides a discussion of the soil vapor analytical results. A summary of the soil vapor analytical results is provided in Table 2. The complete laboratory reports with chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix D. For comparison purposes, Table 2 includes ISVs. ISVs were developed by the MPCA in coordination with the MDH as screening values for evaluating vapor intrusion risks from VOCs identified in indoor air. The potential for indoor air to be impacted by soil vapor intrusion can also be assessed using ISVs. Concentrations of VOCs in air or soil vapor and ISVs are expressed in units of micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). Per MPCA Vapor Investigation Guidance, soil vapor results are compared to 33X ISVs to assess vapor intrusion risk if building conditions are appropriate. According to the guidance, soil vapor concentrations greater than 33X ISVs indicate a vapor source with potential vapor intrusion risk is present. A Site with contaminant concentrations greater than 33X ISVs would typically require either mitigation or additional assessment of potential pathways and receptors to better quantify risks, which might include collection of sub -slab or indoor air samples. Various petroleum and non-petroleum related VOCs were identified in the soil vapor samples at concentrations less than the respective 33X Residential ISVs. Page 317 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 9 5.5 Quality Assurance/Quality Control A data quality assessment of field procedures and laboratory reports was performed to determine the effect of any deviations on data quality and used to support project objectives. All applicable Braun Intertec SOPs were followed as prescribed unless otherwise noted in this report. Soil samples were placed in clean, laboratory-supplied containers, preserved, labeled, and transported to Pace laboratory in Minneapolis, Minnesota under refrigerated conditions using chain-of-custody procedures. Soil vapor samples were collected in clean, laboratory-supplied canisters and transported to Pace laboratory in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee using chain-of-custody procedures. Chain-of-custody forms were reviewed at sample check-in and determined to be in general agreement with the contents of the sample coolers. Analyses were performed using EPA or other recognized standard procedures, and samples were analyzed within the EPA recommended holding times. Laboratory reporting limits were compared against MPCA SLVs and Residential/Recreational SRVs for soil samples. DRO in soil was compared against MPCA unregulated fill criterion. Vapor analytical results were compared against the MPCA 33x Residential ISVs. Reporting limits for the compounds analyzed during the investigation met their respective regulatory standards. One soil trip blank accompanied the investigative samples, and the trip blank was analyzed for VOCs. VOCs were not detected above the method reporting limits in the trip blank. Individually certified canisters were supplied by the laboratory for the collection of the soil vapor samples. During the canister cleanliness certification process, VOCs were not detected above the method reporting limits. The laboratory reported recoveries of VOCs that were outside of method acceptance criteria in laboratory control samples (LCS), continuing calibration verification (CCV) issues, and secondary source verification (ICV) issues with 8260D VOC analyses of soil samples. The affected analytes were non-detect, and the quantitation limits are considered estimated. However, all affected VOC results are below their applicable regulatory limits. In summary, data quality control items identified during the quality review were evaluated and all data collected are acceptable for use in this investigation for the intended purpose of identifying soil and vapor impacts within the area of concern. 6.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The objective of the Phase II ESA was to investigate the recognized environmental conditions (RECs) discovered during the 2025 Phase I ESA. Page 318 of 454 U.S. Home, LLC Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 December 5, 2025 Braun Intertec Page 10 No contaminants were detected at concentrations exceeding applicable regulatory criteria in the soil or soil vapor samples collected for this assessment. Based on the results of this investigation, it does not appear that soil or vapor has been impacted by the RECs identified in the 2025 Phase I ESA. No buried debris was observed in the fifteen test pits advanced in the area where the corn crib was reportedly buried. If buried building debris is encountered during redevelopment activities, the debris-laden soils should be managed appropriately and may require be disposal at a landfill facility permitted to receive such waste. Based on the results of this Phase II ESA, no additional actions are recommended to evaluate the RECs identified in the 2025 Phase I ESA. 7.0 Assessment Limitations The analyses and conclusions submitted in this report are based on field observations and the results of laboratory analyses of soil and soil vapor samples collected from the hand auger borings and soil vapor probes completed for this project. In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Page 319 of 454 Figures 1: Site Location Map 2: Sample Location Map Page 320 of 454 Last Modified: Checked By: Date Drawn: Drawn By: Image Source: USGS US Topo Map Drawing No: Fig1_SiteLocation Project No: B2507386.02 11/20/2025 F:\2025\B2507386_02\GIS\B2507386.02.aprx SCALE: 1" = 2,000' 0 2,0001,000 ' o Approximate Site Location Figure 1 Site Location Map 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 braunintertec.com CK 11/20/2025 ZS Farmington, Minnesota 4752 220th St W Adelman 160 Page 321 of 454 D e n m a r k A v e D e n m a r k A v e Ash StAsh St 225th St W225th St W ")31 6XE6ODE"9DSRU"6DPSOH !<+DQG"$XJHU"%RULQJ "7HVW"3LW $SSUR[LPDWH"6LWH"%RXQGDU\ "+DPSVKLUH"$YHQXH"6 0LQQHDSROLV"01" EUDXQLQWHUWHFFRP 'UDZQ"%\< 'DWH"'UDZQ< &KHFNHG"%\< /DVW"0RGLILHG< )<??%B?*,6?%DSU[ 6RXUFH<"*RRJOH"(DUWK",PDJHU\ 6&$/(<"" ") 'UDZLQJ"1R< )B6DPSOH/RFDWLRQ 3URMHFW"1R< % ) o &. =6 )DUPLQJWRQ"0LQQHVRWD "WK"6W": $GHOPDQ" Sample Location Map )LJXUH" !< !< " "" " "" "" " " " " " " " $3352;,0$7("35,0$5<"86( /2&$7,21"2)"3$576":$6+(5 $3352;,0$7("/2&$7,21"2) 3(752/(80"352'8&7"6725$*( $3352;,0$7("5(3257(' /2&$7,21"2)"%85,(' &251"&5,3"'(%5,6 +$ +$ 7373 7373 7373 7373 7373 7373 73737373 73 73 7373 7373 7373 7373 7373 7373 669 669 Page 322 of 454 Tables 1: Soil Analytical Results 2: Soil Vapor Analytical Results Page 323 of 454 Table 1 Soil Analytical Results Adelman 160 Farmington, Minnesota Project B2507386.02 HA-1 (0-1') HA-2 (0-1') 11/7/2025 11/7/2025 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (mg/kg) All reported VOCs ---<RL <RL ------ Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (mg/kg) Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 <0.0104 0.0174 cPAH cPAH Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 <0.0104 0.0286 cPAH cPAH Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 <0.0104 0.011 cPAH cPAH Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)50-32-8 <0.0104 0.0203 2BTV; cPAH 1.4; cPAH Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 191-24-2 <0.0104 0.0173 NE NE Chrysene 218-01-9 <0.0104 0.0203 cPAH cPAH Fluoranthene 206-44-0 <0.0104 0.0313 210 670 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 193-39-5 <0.0104 0.0166 cPAH cPAH Phenanthrene 85-01-8 <0.0104 0.0165 NE NE Pyrene 129-00-0 <0.0104 0.0272 220 440 All other reported PAHs ---<RL <RL ------ BaP Equivalent Concentration[c]---0 0.0279 2BTV 1.4 Metals (mg/kg) Arsenic, Total 7440-38-2 4.8 2.4 9BTV 5.8 Barium, Total 7440-39-3 61.8 65.3 260 1,700 Cadmium, Total 7440-43-9 <0.16 <0.16 1.6 8.8 Chromium, Total[e]7440-47-3 6.8 8.7 23,000/7.1[e]1,000,000,000/36[e] Lead, Total 7439-92-1 3.5 13.1 200 2,700 Mercury, Total 7439-97-6 <0.018 <0.021 2.7 3.3 Selenium, Total 7782-49-2 <1.0 <1.1 78 2.6 Silver, Total 7440-22-4 <0.52 <0.55 78 7.9 Petroleum Parameters (mg/kg) Diesel Range Organics (DRO)---13.2 [3]<9.9 Notes mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram. < = Not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit indicated. --- = Not analyzed or calculated for this parameter or not applicable. Bold indicates the compound was detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit. cPAH = Individual regulatory limit not established for this carcinogenic PAH; included in BaP equivalent calculation. NE = Regulatory limit not established for this parameter. [e] = Reported result is total chromium, regulatory limits for chromium III and chromium VI are provided. [3] [T6] High boiling point hydrocarbons are present in the sample. Exceeds Residential/Recreational SRV Exceeds SLV Exceeds 100 mg/kg for DRO/GRO MPCA Unreg. Fill Criterion 100[f] Compound/Parameter CAS No. Sample Identifier and Date Collected Residential/ Recreational SRV (mg/kg) SLV (mg/kg) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Soil Reference Values (SRVs) updated in February 2025 (MPCA Guidance Document c-r1-06) and Soil Leaching Values (SLVs) updated in June 2013 (MPCA Guidance Document c-r1-03). The most conservative value for acute or chronic Residential/Recreational SRV is presented, if applicable. BTV = Background Threshold Value. BTVs are not calculated health based SRVs. The MPCA calculated SRVs were determined to be below background values (MPCA Guidance Document c-r1-05). RL = Reporting limits for other parameters that are not listed individually in this table because their concentrations were below reporting limits provided in the laboratory report. [c] = Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalent concentration is calculated based on the concentration and weighted toxicity of cPAHs (MPCA Guidance Document c-r1-5). If no cPAHs were detected above reasonable laboratory reporting limits the BaP equivalent concentration is reported as 0 mg/kg per MPCA Remediation Division Policy (MPCA Guidance Document c-rem3-03). [f] = DRO/GRO concentrations greater than 100 mg/kg are not suitable for reuse as unregulated fill per MPCA Guidance Document c-rem1-01 Best Management Practices for the Off-Site Reuse of Unregulated Fill . Page 1 of 1 Page 324 of 454 Table 2 Soil Vapor Analytical Results Adelman 160 Farmington, Minnesota Project B2507386.02 SSV-1 SSV-2 11/7/2025 11/7/2025 0.1 ppm 0.1 ppm Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) (μg/m3) Acetone 67-64-1 123 40.6 20,000 670,000 2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone, MEK)78-93-3 12 5.66 3,000 100,000 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 < 1.26 1.94 1.7 57 Cyclohexane 110-82-7 3.75 3.48 6,300 210,000 Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)75-71-8 2.22 2.15 NE NE Ethanol 64-17-5 38.1 21.9 NE NE n-Hexane 110-54-3 2.91 < 2.22 730 24,000 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)75-09-2 1.81 < 0.694 630 21,000 2-Propanol (Isopropyl alcohol)67-63-0 5.68 4.55 210 7,000 Tetrachloroethene (Perchloroethene, PCE)127-18-4 < 1.36 2.36 3.4 110 Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)75-69-4 1.3 1.15 1,000 33,000 Xylenes, m- & p-179601-23-1 < 1.73 2.01 NE NE Xylene, o-95-47-6 < 0.867 0.967 NE NE Xylenes, Total 1330-20-7 <RL 2.98 100[d]3,300[d] All other reported VOCs ---<RL <RL ------ Notes µg/m3 = Micrograms per cubic meter. ppm = Parts per million. < = Not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit indicated. --- = Not analyzed or calculated for this parameter or not applicable. Bold indicates the compound was detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit. Indicated depths are feet below ground surface. PID = Photoionization detector. NE = Regulatory limit not established for this parameter. [d] = The laboratory reports values for m- & p- xylenes and o-xylene, however the regulatory limit is for the combination of m-, p-, and o-xylenes. Exceeds 33X Residential ISV Exceeds Residential ISV Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Intrusion Screening Values (ISVs) were updated in October 2024 (MPCA Guidance Document aq1- 36). 33X Residential ISV (µg/m3) RL = Reporting limits for other parameters that are not listed individually in this table because their concentrations were below reporting limits provided in the laboratory report. Compound/Parameter CAS No. Sample Identifier, Sample Depth, PID Reading, and Date Collected Residential ISV (μg/m3) Page 1 of 1 Page 325 of 454 Appendix A. Proposed Redevelopment Concept Plan Page 326 of 454 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-4 R-2 MDR POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND POND WETLAND WETLAND POND POND c 1OFADELMANN PROPERTY EUREKA TOWNSHIP/FARMINGTON, MINNESOTA LENNAR3-31-2025 JLT JLT Name Reg. No.Date Revisions Date Designed Drawn 2024 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 44763 Jennifer L. Thompson 1CONCEPT PLAN 1 6,TEDATA *5O66A5EA A&5E6 WETLANDA5EA A&5E6 DEN0A5.A9EN8EANDT+6T5EET5OW A&5E6 NETDE9ELOPA%LEA5EA A&5E6 &855ENTL<8N*8,DEDAND8N=ONED P5OPO6EDLAND86E 6,N*LE)A0,L< LOWDEN6,T<5E6,DENT,AL 8N,T6A&5E TOWN+O0E6 LOW0ED,80DEN6,T<5E6,DENT,AL 8N,T6A&5E P5OPO6ED=ON,N* P8D 5TOWN+O0E656,N*LE)A0,L< P5OPO6ED8N,T6 6,N*LE)A0,L< 6,N*LE)A0,L< L,%E5T<TOWN+O0E6 NETDEN6,T<6,N*LE)A0,L< A&5E6 8N,T6A&5E NETDEN6,T<TOWN+O0E6 A&5E6 8N,T6A&5E P5OPO6ED5OW P5,9ATED5,9E TOWN+O0E6 L) 56TANDA5D6 A5EA 6) W,DT+ )5ONT6ET%A&. 6,DE6ET%A&. 5EA56ET%A&. LOT&O9E5A*E0A; 56TANDA5D6 8N,TW,DT+ )5ONT6ET%A&. 6,DE6ETA&. 5EA56ET%A&. LOT&O9E5A*E0A; 6ET%A&.TO0,NO5A5TE5,AL5OADWA<6 6,N*LE)A0,L<P8DP5OPO6ED6TANDA5D6 W,DT+ A5EA 6)6) 6,DE6ET%A&. )5ONT6ET%A&. P5O-E&T%O8NDA5< )LOODPLA,N 6+O5ELANDO9E5LA< 9E50,LL,ON5,9E5 95W-PO-85,6D,&T,ON T5O8TDE6,*NAT,ONWATE548AL,T<&O55,DO5&ON6E59AT,ON&O55,DO5 %8))E5A9E5A*EW,T+0,N,080 &ON&EPT%A6EDONA9A,LA%LEDATA NOEN*,NEE5,N* NO6859E<,N* WETLAND6+A9ENOT%EENDEL,NEATED &ON&EPT68%-E&TTO&+AN*EW,T+O8TNOT,&E Pa g e 3 2 7 o f 4 5 4 Appendix B. Photographic Documentation Page 328 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 1 of 10 Photograph 1 November 10, 2025 Direction: East Subject: Equipment used for excavating test pits Photograph 2 November 10, 2025 Direction: East Subject: Topsoil layer observed in top foot of TP-1 Page 329 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 2 of 10 Photograph 3 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-1 to 10 feet below ground surface (bgs), no debris observed Photograph 4 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-2 to 10 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 330 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 3 of 10 Photograph 5 November 10, 2025 Direction: West Subject: Native soil from TP-3 stockpiled, no debris observed Photograph 6 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-3 to 10 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 331 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 4 of 10 Photograph 7 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-3, native soils observed by 3 feet bgs Photograph 8 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-4 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 332 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 5 of 10 Photograph 9 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-5 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Photograph 10 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-6 to 5 feet bgs, no debris o Page 333 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 6 of 10 Photograph 11 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-7 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Photograph 12 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-8 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 334 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 7 of 10 Photograph 13 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-9 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Photograph 14 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-10 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 335 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 8 of 10 Photograph 15 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-11 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Photograph 16 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-12 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 336 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 9 of 10 Photograph 17 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-13 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Photograph 18 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-14 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 337 of 454 Adelman Property Project B2507386.02 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota Braun Intertec Page 10 of 10 Photograph 19 November 10, 2025 Subject: TP-15 to 5 feet bgs, no debris observed Page 338 of 454 Appendix C. Test Pit Logs Page 339 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 4.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine-grained, trace Gravel, dark brown to black, moist END OF HAND AUGER Boring immediately backfilled 5 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.9 Tests or Remarks Soil sample HA-1 (0-1’) @ 10:45 collected for analytical testing Water not observed while augering. LOG OF HAND AUGER Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota HAND AUGER:HA-1 LOCATION: Estimated. See attached figure DATUM: NORTHING:EASTING: OPERATOR:LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/07/25 END DATE:11/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:METHOD:Hand Auger SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 HA-1 page 1 of 1 Page 340 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 0.3 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CONCRETE, 4 inches FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, dark brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist CLAYEY SAND (SC), brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF HAND AUGER Boring immediately backfilled 5 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.7 1.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 Tests or Remarks Soil sample HA-2 (0-1’) @ 11:38 collected for analytical testing Water not observed while augering. LOG OF HAND AUGER Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota HAND AUGER:HA-2 LOCATION: Estimated. See attached figure DATUM: NORTHING:EASTING: OPERATOR:LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/07/25 END DATE:11/07/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:METHOD:Hand Auger SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 HA-2 page 1 of 1 Page 341 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 10.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL FILL) FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-1 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157588 EASTING:540277 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-1 page 1 of 1 Page 342 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 10.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-2 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157564 EASTING:540264 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-2 page 1 of 1 Page 343 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 10.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-3 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157575 EASTING:540303 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-3 page 1 of 1 Page 344 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-4 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157611 EASTING:540313 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-4 page 1 of 1 Page 345 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-5 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157547 EASTING:540312 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-5 page 1 of 1 Page 346 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-6 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157554 EASTING:540291 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-6 page 1 of 1 Page 347 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-7 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157527 EASTING:540302 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-7 page 1 of 1 Page 348 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-8 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157534 EASTING:540276 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-8 page 1 of 1 Page 349 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-9 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157637 EASTING:540283 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-9 page 1 of 1 Page 350 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-10 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157605 EASTING:540293 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-10 page 1 of 1 Page 351 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-11 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157636 EASTING:540319 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-11 page 1 of 1 Page 352 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-12 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157592 EASTING:540326 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-12 page 1 of 1 Page 353 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-13 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157568 EASTING:540331 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-13 page 1 of 1 Page 354 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-14 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157547 EASTING:540333 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-14 page 1 of 1 Page 355 of 454 Elev./ Depth ft 1.0 3.0 5.0 Wa t e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487) CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace roots, black, moist (TOPSOIL) CLAYEY SAND (SC), dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, moist END OF TEST PIT Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 Sa m p l e PID ppm 0.1 0.1 0.1 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while excavating. LOG OF TEST PIT Project Number B2507386.02 Environmental Investigation Adelman 160 4752 220th Street W Farmington, Minnesota TEST PIT:TP-15 LOCATION: Captured with submeter GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:157520 EASTING:540332 EXCAVATOR:Kamish Excavating LOGGED BY:C. Kiel START DATE:11/10/25 END DATE:11/10/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:RIG:SURFACING:WEATHER: B2507386.02 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:12/04/2025 TP-15 page 1 of 1 Page 356 of 454 APPENDIX F Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Calculator Analysis Page 357 of 454 Scope 1 Emissions from Mobile Sources Guidance - If mileage or fuel usage is unknown, estimate using approximate fuel economy values (see Reference Table below). - Vehicle year and Miles traveled are not necessary for non-road equiment. Biodiesel Percent:20 % Ethanol Percent:80 % Table 1. Mobile Source Fuel Combustion and Miles Traveled Source Source Vehicle Vehicle Fuel Units Miles CO2 CO2 ID Description Type Year Usage Traveled (kg) (tons) Fleet-012 HQ Fleet OnRoad Passenger Cars - Gasoline 2019 500 gal 11,450 Construction Equipment Phase I - Construction Equipment NonRoad Industrial/Commercial Equipment - Diesel 2007 296,400 gallons 2,602,392 2,869 Passenger Cars Phase I - Passenger Cars OnRoad Passenger Cars - Gasoline 2007 595,400 gallons 26,000 6,079,034 6,701 Reference Table: Average Fuel Economy by Vehicle Type Passenger Cars 22.9 Motorcycles 44.0 Diesel Buses (Diesel Heavy-Duty Vehicles)7.3 Other 2-axle, 4-Tire Vehicles 18.0 Single unit 2-Axle 6-Tire or More Trucks 7.6 Combination Trucks 6.2 Average mpg values from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2020 (November 2022), Table VM-1. GHG Emissions Total Organization-Wide On-Road Gasoline Mobile Source Mileage and CH 4/N2O Emissions Vehicle Year Mileage (miles) CH4 (g) N2O (g) Passenger Cars - Gasoline 1984-93 0 0.0 0.0 1994 0 0.0 0.0 1995 0 0.0 0.0 1996 0 0.0 0.0 1997 0 0.0 0.0 1998 0 0.0 0.0 1999 0 0.0 0.0 2000 0 0.0 0.0 2001 0 0.0 0.0 2002 0 0.0 0.0 2003 0 0.0 0.0 2004 0 0.0 0.0 2005 0 0.0 0.0 2006 0 0.0 0.0 2007 26,000 187.2 135.2 2008 0 0.0 0.0 2009 0 0.0 0.0 2010 0 0.0 0.0 2011 0 0.0 0.0 2012 0 0.0 0.0 2013 0 0.0 0.0 2014 0 0.0 0.0 2015 0 0.0 0.0 2016 0 0.0 0.0 2017 0 0.0 0.0 2018 0 0.0 0.0 2019 0 0.0 0.0 2020 0 0.0 0.0 2021 0 0.0 0.0 2022 0 0.0 0.0 2023 0 0.0 0.0 Total Organization-Wide Non-Road Mobile Source Fuel Usage and CH 4/N2O Emissions Vehicle Type Fuel Type Fuel Usage (gallons)CH4 (g) N2O (g) Gasoline (2 stroke)- Gasoline (4 stroke) - - - Gasoline Off-Road Trucks - - - Diesel Equipment 296,400 299,364 278,616 Diesel Off-Road Trucks - - - LPG - - - Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Mobile Sources 9,569.5 Total Biomass CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Mobile Sources 0.0 On-Road or Non-Road? Average Fuel Economy (mpg) Vehicle Type Vehicle Type - Enter "Fuel Usage" in appropriate units (units appear when vehicle type is selected). (C) Biomass CO2 emissions from biodiesel and ethanol are not reported in the total emissions, but are reported separately at the bottom of the sheet. (B) When using biofuels, typically the biofuel (biodiesel or ethanol) is mixed with a petroleum fuel (diesel or gasoline) for use in vehicles. Enter the biodiesel and ethanol percentages of the fuel if known, or leave default values. (A) Enter annual data for each vehicle or group of vehicles (grouped by vehicle type, vehicle year, and fuel type) in ORANGE cells in Table 1. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). Only enter vehicles owned or leased by your organization on this sheet. All other vehicle use such as employee commuting or business travel is considered a scope 3 emissions source and should be reported in the corresponding scope 3 sheets. - Select "Vehicle Type" from drop down box (closest type available). - Select "On-Road" or "Non-Road" from drop down box to determine the Vehicle Types available. Must make this selection before picking vehicle type. - Note: As of the v9 Simplified GHG Calculation tool update, the latest mobile combustion factors reflect year 2020 data. Therefore, for all vehicle model years 2021 onward, the 2020 year factor is used. Construction/Mining Equipment EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Direct 2.0)1 of 1 Pa g e 3 5 8 o f 4 5 4 Scope 2 Emissions from Purchase of Electricity Guidance (C) Select "eGRID subregion" from drop box and enter "Electricity Purchased." https://www.epa.gov/egrid/power-profiler#/ Tips: Enter electricity usage by location and then look up the eGRID subregion for each location. Table 1. Total Amount of Electricity Purchased by eGRID Subregion Source Source Source eGRID Subregion Electricity CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O CO2 CH4 N2O ID Description Area (Acres)where electricity is consumed Purchased Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions Emissions (kWh) (lb/MWh) (lb/MWh) (lb/MWh) (lb) (lb) (lb) (lb) (lb) (lb) Bldg-012 East Power Plant 12,517 HIMS (HICC Miscellaneous) 200,000 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 226,880.0 27.0 4.2 Residential Single-Family Detached Residential 370 Units 71.3 MROW (MRO West) 3,452,470 <enter factor> <enter factor> <enter factor> 3,437,969.6 369.4 51.8 3,437,969.6 369.4 51.8 Total Emissions for All Sources 3,452,470 3,437,969.6 369.4 51.8 3,437,969.6 369.4 51.8 GHG Emissions CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) Location-Based Electricity Emissions 1,570.7 Market-Based Electricity Emissions 1,570.7 Notes: 1. CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions are estimated using methodology provided in EPA's Center for Corporate Climate Leadership Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance - Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity (January 2016). (D) See the market-based emission factor hierarchy on the market-based method Help sheet. If any of the first four types of emission factors are applicable, enter the factors in the yellow cells marked as "<enter factor>". If not, leave the yellow cells as is, and eGRID subregion factors will be used for market-based emissions. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ) for a facility that purchases RECs for 100% of its consumption, and therefore has a market-based emission factor of 0. The Indirect Emissions from Purchased Electricity Guidance document provides guidance for quantifying two scope 2 emissions totals, using a location-based method and a market-based method. The organization should quantify and report both totals in its GHG inventory. The location-based method considers average emission factors for the electricity grids that provide electricity. The market-based method considers contractual arrangements under which the organization procures electricity from specific sources, such as renewable energy. - Use map (Figure 1) at bottom of sheet to determine appropriate eGRID subregion. If subregion cannot be determined from the map, find the correct subregion by entering the location's zip code into EPA’s Power Profiler: (A) Enter total annual electricity purchased in kWh and each eGRID subregion for each facility or site in ORANGE cells of Table 1. (B) If electricity consumption data are not available for a facility, an estimate should be made for completeness. See the "Items to Note" section of the Help sheet for suggested estimation approaches. If you purchase renewable energy that is less than 100% of your site's electricity, see the example in the market-based method Help sheet. Location-Based Emission Factors Emissions Emissions Market-Based Use these cells to enter applicable market-based emission factors Help - Market-Based Method EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Indirect 1.0)1 of 1 Pa g e 3 5 9 o f 4 5 4 Scope 3 Emissions from Waste Guidance Source ID Source Description Waste Material Disposal Method Weight Unit CO2e Emissions (kg) CO2e Emissions (tons) Bldg-012 East Power Plant Finished Goods Copper Wire Landfilled 1,000 metric ton 22,040 Residential 370 Residential Units Mixed MSW municipal solid waste Landfilled 956,154 pounds (lb)248,600 274 Residential 370 Residential Units Mixed Recyclables Recycled 478,077 pounds (lb)21,513 24 GHG Emissions Total Emissions by Disposal Method - Residential Waste Material CO2e (kg)Estimated Residents Rate Generated (lbs/day/person) Total Rate Generated (lbs/day) Total Rate Generated (lbs/year) Recycled 21,513 1,092 1.2 1,309.8 478,077.0 Landfilled 248,600 1,092 2.4 2,619.6 956,154.0 Combusted - Composted - Anaerobically Digested (Dry Digestate with Curing) - Anaerobically Digested (Wet Digestate with Curing) - 297.7 (B) First, choose the appropriate material then the disposal method from the drop down options. For the average-data method, use one of the mixed material types, such as mixed MSW. If the exact waste material is not available, consider an appropriate proxy. For example, dimensional lumber can be used as a proxy for wood furniture. (C) Choose an appropriate disposal method. Note that not all disposal methods are available for all materials. If there is a #NA or # Value error in the emissions column, you must pick a new material type or appropriate disposal method. (A) Enter annual waste data in ORANGE cells. Example entry is shown in first row (GREEN Italics ). Table 1. Waste Disposal Weight by Waste Material and Disposal Method (CO2, CH4 and N2O) Total CO2 Equivalent Emissions (metric tons) - Waste EPA Climate Leaders Simplified GHG Emissions Calculator (Optional 3.0)1 of 1 Pa g e 3 6 0 o f 4 5 4 APPENDIX G Traffic Study Page 361 of 454 Traffic Impact Study - REVISED Vermillion Reserve Farmington, Minnesota Lennar 612.875.2417 29 April 2026 Page 362 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: Scott P. Israelson Signature: Date: 1/9/2026 License # 26531 Page 363 of 454 REV 04/29/26 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington - Lennar Executive Summary 1 Executive Summary Project Description Lennar proposes to develop Vermillion Reserve in Farmington, Minnesota. The proposed development will consist of 370 single-family homes and is situated in the southwest corner of Denmark Avenue (CSAH 31) & 220th Street W (CSAH 74). The site will have full-access connections to 220th Street W, Denmark Avenue, and 225th Street W. This analysis is intended to support the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). This REVISED analysis incorporates comments from the County. Trip Generation The development is expected to generate 3,251 daily trips, with 68 entering trips and 185 exiting trips in the AM peak hour, and 199 entering and 122 exiting trips in the PM peak hour. Turn Lanes/Sight Distance The County has directed that right-turn lanes are required at accesses on county roads due to the size of development. Traffic Impacts Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W The County Road 31 and County Road 74 Study will examine intersection control options for the intersection of Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W. That study is ongoing and results of that document were not available during preparation of this document. Analysis shows that the intersection is expected to see LOS F for the Full Build scenario. Projected future volumes including 13-hour data plus time-of-day extrapolated development trips indicate that the intersection is expected to meet the following warrants: Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Volumes o Condition A (Minimum Vehicular Volume) o Condition A+B Warrant 2, Four-Hour Volumes It is recommended to monitor volumes at the intersection and implement signalized control when volumes meet warrants. Page 364 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington - Lennar Executive Summary 2 Recommended Improvements Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W Monitor volumes and implement signalized control when volumes meet warrants. Denmark Avenue & Accesses C and D Construct southbound right-turn lanes with 300 feet of deceleration distance plus a 180-foot taper. Page 365 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................ 2 Figure 1 – Site Plan ......................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 – Vicinity Map .................................................................................... 4 II. Existing Conditions ..................................................................................... 5 A.Existing Roadway Conditions ....................................................................................... 5 B.Existing Intersection Geometry ................................................................................... 5 C.Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................... 5 D.Planned Improvements ............................................................................................... 5 Figure 3 – Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................. 6 III. Methodology .............................................................................................. 7 A.Base Assumptions ....................................................................................................... 7 B.Background Growth .................................................................................................... 7 C.Trip Generation .......................................................................................................... 7 D.Trip Distribution ......................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4 – Trip Distribution .............................................................................. 8 Figure 5 – Site Trips ........................................................................................ 9 Figure 6 – Full Build 2030 Volumes ................................................................. 10 IV. Turn Lane/Access Management ................................................................ 11 A.Right-Turn Lanes ...................................................................................................... 11 B.Left-Turn Lanes ........................................................................................................ 11 C.Intersection Sight Distance ........................................................................................ 12 D.Access Spacing ......................................................................................................... 15 V. Capacity Analysis ...................................................................................... 16 A.Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W ............................................................................ 17 B.Denmark Avenue & 225th Street W ............................................................................ 19 C.220th Street W & 218th Street .................................................................................. 20 D.220th Street W & Denton Avenue .............................................................................. 21 E.Denmark Avenue & Church of St Michael’s/Legacy of Farmington driveway ................ 22 E.Denmark Avenue & Access D ..................................................................................... 23 VI. Summary and Conclusion ......................................................................... 24 Appendix ...................................................................................................... 25 Page 366 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 2 I. Introduction Lennar proposes to develop Vermillion Reserve in Farmington, Minnesota. The development is situated in the southwest corner of Denmark Avenue (CSAH 31) & 220th Street W (CSAH 74). The development is proposed to consist of 370 single-family homes and will have full-access driveways to 220th Street W, Denmark Avenue, and 225th Street W. Build out is expected in 2030. This analysis is intended to support the project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). This REVISED analysis incorporates comments from the County. The study area included the following intersections: Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W 220th Street W & Access A/218th St W 220th Street W & Denton Avenue/Access B Denmark Avenue & church driveway/Access C Denmark Avenue & Access D The study analyzed the following scenarios: 2025 Existing Conditions Full Build 2030 Conditions The AM peak hour and PM peak hour were analyzed. Figure 1 shows the most recent site plan. Figure 2 shows the project vicinity map. Page 367 of 454 Site Plan Figure 1 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington - Lennar Date: 24 December 2025 Pa g e 3 6 8 o f 4 5 4 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington - Lennar Project Location Date: 23 December 2025 31 COUNTY 31 COUNTY 74 COUNTY 50 COUNTY 50 COUNTY Pa g e 3 6 9 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 5 II. Existing Conditions A. Existing Roadway Conditions Table 1 presents a summary of the existing roadway conditions in the study area. Figure 3 shows the roadways in the study area. Table 1 – Existing Roadways Street Name Functional Class Typical Section Posted Speed AADT Denmark Avenue (CR 31) Minor Collector Two-lane undivided 50 mph 1,983 220th Street Major Collector Unpaved Not posted 135 225th Street Minor Collector Unpaved Not posted n/a B. Existing Intersection Geometry Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W is unsignalized with stop control for 220th Street. The westbound approach has a right-turn lane. Access A will be a full-access connection to 220th Street W and will align with 218th Street W. Access B will be a full-access connection to 220th Street W and will align with Denton Avenue. Access C will be a full-access connection to Denmark Avenue and will align with the driveway for Church of St Michael’s/Legacy of Farmington senior living facility driveway Access D will be a full-access connection to Denmark Avenue. Accesses E and F will be full-access connections to 225th Street W. C. Traffic Volumes Traffic data collection for study area intersections was performed on December 11, 2025. Figure 3 displays existing traffic volumes. These volumes can be found in the Appendix. The most recent Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes were retrieved from the MnDOT Planning Office website. D. Planned Improvements The County Road 31 and County Road 74 Study will examine intersection control options for the intersection of Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W. The study is ongoing. The Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan shows CSAH 74 extending west to intersection CSAH 23 (Cedar Avenue). This improvement is not programmed nor funded and is not included. Page 370 of 454 Existing Traffic Volumes Figure 3 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington - Lennar NOT TO SCALE XX/XX XX/XX XX/XX LEGEND Turn movement AM/PM peak volumes Date: 23 December 2025 220th St W & 218th St W 105/128 139/89 104/128 8/8 134/89 5/0 3/14 1/0 134/116 11/11 23/31 10/17 2/4 2/1 1/0 92/79 38/25 19/7 78/104 123/159 3/7 85/111 0/0 110/73 7/7 0/1 25/4 10/6 1/0 2/1 0/4 8/21 220th St W & Denton Ave Denmark Ave & 220th St W Denmark Ave & church- senior living drwy Denmark Ave & Access D Denmark Ave & 225th St W 2/6 27/11 0/0 10/22 6/0 3/3 Pa g e 3 7 1 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 7 III. Methodology A. Base Assumptions Intersection capacity analysis was conducted using Synchro v11.0. Trip generation was calculated using the 12th edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Left-turn lanes were examined using the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report No. 279 Intersection Channelization Design Guide. Right-turn lanes were examined using MnDOT Right-Turn Lane Analysis Checks. B. Background Growth Background growth is calculated using historical AADT volumes. Analysis shows that the background growth on Denmark Avenue is 10.23% per year. These calculations are in the appendix. Existing volumes were increased by 50% to estimate background growth for Full Build 2030 conditions. C. Trip Generation The development is proposed to consist of 370 single-family homes. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition was used to estimate the projected trips by this development. Table 2 contains the summary of the land uses and sizes used for trip generation estimates. Table 2 - ITE Trip Generation Average Weekday Driveway Volumes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use ITE Code Size Daily Trips Enter Exit Enter Exit Single-Family Detached Housing 210 370 Dwelling Units 3251 68 185 199 122 D. Trip Distribution Trips for this proposed development were assigned to the surrounding roadway network based on existing traffic patterns and engineering judgment. The proposed trip distribution for this project can be found in Figure 4, and the site trips are shown in Figure 5. Full Build 2030 volumes are shown in Figure 6. Page 372 of 454 Trip Distribution Figure 4 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington - Lennar NOT TO SCALE Date: 23 December 2025 LEGEND Site Trip Distribution XX% 50% 0.5% 0.5% 1% 40% 0.5% 7% 0.5% Pa g e 3 7 3 o f 4 5 4 Site Trips Figure 5 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington - Lennar NOT TO SCALE XX/XX XX/XX XX/XX LEGEND Turn movement AM/PM peak volumes Date: 9 January 2026 11/32 11/33 1/0 30/19 0/0 0/0 2/1 30/20 1/2 220th St W & 218th St W/Access A 11/32 11/31 0/1 29/19 1/1 30/19 10/31 26/63 1/2 56/42 28/18 2/2 0/0 11/33 0/0 0/1 1/1 1/1 30/20 0/1 9/26 18/54 31/20 24/16 4/3 2/4 61/39 50/33 12/34 22/66 20/58 9/6 2/5 3/9 54/35 4/3 11/31 1/1 0/1 0/1 1/1 29/19 220th St W & Denton Ave/Access B Denmark Ave & 220th St W 0/0 0/1 0/0 28/18 1/1 2/2 1/2 84/58 0/0 10/31 34/92 0/0 Denmark Ave & church- senior living drwy/Access C Denmark Ave & Access D Denmark Ave & 225th St W 225th St W & Access E 225th St W & Access F Pa g e 3 7 4 o f 4 5 4 Full Build 2030 Volumes Figure 6 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington - Lennar NOT TO SCALE XX/XX XX/XX XX/XX LEGEND Turn movement AM/PM peak volumes Date: 9 January 2026 3/9 52/48 11/33 1/0 45/52 0/0 0/0 2/1 30/20 9/1 1/2 5/5 220th St W & 218th St W/Access A 11/32 16/42 0/1 40/31 1/1 30/19 10/31 184/255 1/2 265/176 28/18 2/2 38/6 15/9 11/33 2/0 3/2 0/1 1/1 1/1 30/20 0/6 0/1 12/32 201/174 26/43 53/101 46/46 27/22 7/5 4/5 199/158 107/71 41/45 139/222 185/239 25/69 137/173 2/5 168/119 65/46 4/5 11/31 6/12 0/1 11/13 1/1 29/19 220th St W & Denton Ave/Access B Denmark Ave & 220th St W 5/21 0/1 2/0 28/18 1/1 2/2 1/2 285/192 8/0 10/31 190/284 12/12 Denmark Ave & church- senior living drwy/Access C Denmark Ave & Access D Denmark Ave & 225th St W 225th St W & Access E 225th St W & Access F Pa g e 3 7 5 o f 4 5 4 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 11 IV. Turn Lane/Access Management A. Right-Turn Lanes The County uses MnDOT Right-Turn Lane Analysis Checks for right-turn lanes, but the County requires right-turn lanes for accesses to county roads due to the size of development. The chart below shows MnDOT right-turn checks for intersections. Table 3 shows the volumes used for analysis. Table 3 - Right-Turn Lane Analysis Driveway AM/ PM Approach Posted Speed Advancing Vol RT Vol Turn Lane needed? Denmark Ave & 225th AM SB 50 137 25 No PM 173 69 No B. Left-Turn Lanes The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 279 Intersection Channelization Design Guide was used to determine left-turn lane thresholds for this study. Page 376 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 12 Table 4 shows the volumes used in the analysis. Table 4 - Left-Turn Lane Analysis Driveway AM/ PM Approach Posted Speed Advancing Vol Opposing Vol LT Vol Turn Lane needed? Denmark Ave & Access C AM NB 50 293 200 1 No PM 192 315 2 No Denmark Ave & Access D AM NB 50 265 194 1 No PM 176 286 2 No Based on Full Build volumes, no turn lanes are required for project accesses. These calculations can be found in the Appendix. C. Intersection Sight Distance The table below shows required ISD for posted speeds based on AASHTO Greenbook standards. A site visit shows that there are no sight distance obstructions that obscure the view of vehicles. Page 377 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 13 220th Street W - looking west 220th Street W - looking east Page 378 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 14 Denmark Avenue & Access C - looking north Denmark Avenue & Access C - looking south Page 379 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 15 225th Street W - looking west D. Access Spacing Accesses A, B, C, and D will be located to align with existing streets or driveways. 225th Street W has no posted speed limit and has less than 1,500 vpd. The County requires 1/8- mile access spacing on roadways with posted speed limits less than 45 mph.. Accesses E and F will be full-access connections to 225th Street W. Access F will be located approximately 1200 feet west of Denmark Avenue and Access E will be located approximately 1,400 feet west of Access F. Page 380 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 16 V. Capacity Analysis The Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) uses the term “level of service” (LOS) to measure how traffic operates in intersections. There are currently six levels of service ranging from A to F. Level of Service “A” represents the best conditions and Level of Service “F” represents the worst. Synchro software was used to determine the level of service for intersections in the study area. All worksheet reports from the analyses can be found in the Appendix. Table 5 shows the control delay per vehicle associated with LOS A through F for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 5 – Highway Capacity Manual Levels of Service and Control Delay Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Control Delay per Vehicle (sec) Level of Service Control Delay per Vehicle (sec) A 10 A 10 B 10 and 20 B 10 and 15 C 20 and 35 C 15 and 25 D 35 and 55 D 25 and 35 E 55 and 80 E 35 and 50 F 80 F 50 Page 381 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 17 A. Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W is unsignalized with stop control for 220th Street. The westbound approach has a right-turn lane. Table 6 shows the current LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for existing conditions. Table 6 Existing 2025 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue Denmark Ave & 220th St W EB LT B 14.1 3' C 18.1 8' TH RT WB LT B 13.4 5' C 16.3 10' TH RT A 9.7 13' A 9.6 13' NB LT Free TH RT SB LT Free TH RT For the Full Build scenario, the intersection is modeled as follows: EB - shared left-through lane and right-turn lane, WB - shared left-through lane and right-turn lane, NB - left-turn lane and shared through-right lane, and SB - left-turn lane, one through lane, and right-turn lane. Page 382 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 18 Table 7 shows the expected LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for Full Build 2030 conditions. Queue lengths were determined using SimTraffic simulation. Table 7 Full Build 2027 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue Denmark Ave & 220th St W EB LT D 33.8 46' F 90.7 50' TH RT A 9.1 18' A 9.6 20' WB LT D 29.9 74' F 165.2 91' TH RT B 11.6 101' B 11.2 110' NB LT A 7.6 7' A 7.9 7' TH Free RT SB LT A 8.5 63' A 8.5 76' TH Free RT Analysis shows that the eastbound and westbound approaches are projected to experience LOS F in the Full Build scenario. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) is the state standard for all traffic control devices. For traffic control signals, the MnMUTCD provides nine traffic signal control warrants to determine if signalized control is justified at a location. Warrants for traffic signal control include thresholds for vehicular traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, school crossing conditions, accident/crash experience, and proximity to rail crossings. For intersections that do not meet warrants for signalization, the MnMUTCD provides four warrants for all-way stop control. MnDOT analyzes intersection control using the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) process, which allows criteria for all-way stop control as meeting warrants for roundabouts. Analysis reveals that the intersection meets warrants for signalized control with projected full build volumes for the following: Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Volumes o Condition A (Minimum Vehicular Volume) o Condition A+B Warrant 2, Four-Hour Volumes The results of the warrant analysis are included in the Appendix. Page 383 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 19 B. Denmark Avenue & 225th Street W Table 8 shows the current LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for existing conditions. Table 8 Existing 2025 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue Denmark Ave & 225th St W EB LT B 10.0 - A 9.5 - RT NB LT Free TH SB TH Free RT Table 9 shows the expected LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for Full Build 2030 conditions. Table 9 Full Build 2027 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue Denmark Ave & 225th St W EB LT B 12.0 15' B 11.1 8' RT NB LT Free TH SB TH Free RT Page 384 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 20 C. 220th Street W & 218th Street Table 10 shows the current LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for existing conditions. Table 10 Existing 2025 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue 220th St W & 218th St EB LT Free TH WB TH Free RT SB LT A 8.8 - A 8.7 3' RT Access A will be a full-access connection to 220th Street W that aligns with 218th Street. Table 11 shows the expected LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for Full Build 2030 conditions. Table 11 Full Build 2027 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue 220th St W & 218th St/Access A EB LT Free TH RT WB LT Free TH RT NB LT A 8.5 5' A 8.6 3' TH RT SB LT A 9.6 3' A 9.9 8' TH RT Page 385 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 21 D. 220th Street W & Denton Avenue Table 12 shows the current LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for existing conditions. Table 12 Existing 2025 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue 220th St W & Denton Ave EB LT Free TH WB TH Free RT SB LT A 8.8 - A 8.8 - RT Access B will be a full-access connection to 220th Street W and will align with Denton Avenue. Table 13 shows the expected LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for Full Build 2030 conditions. Table 13 Full Build 2027 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue 220th St W & Denton Ave/Access B EB LT Free TH RT WB LT Free TH RT NB LT A 8.8 5' A 8.9 3' TH RT SB LT A 9.5 3' B 10.5 3' TH RT Page 386 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 22 E. Denmark Avenue & Church of St Michael’s/Legacy of Farmington driveway Table 14 shows the current LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for existing conditions. Table 14 Existing 2025 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue 220th St W & church-senior living drwy WB LT A 9.4 - A 8.9 3' RT NB TH Free RT SB LT Free TH Access C will be a full-access connection to Denmark Avenue and will align with the church/senior living driveway. Table 15 shows the expected LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for Full Build 2030 conditions. Table 15 Full Build 2027 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue 220th St W & church-senior living drwy/Access C EB LT B 14.6 10' C 15.4 8' TH RT WB LT B 11.3 - A 9.9 3' TH RT NB LT Free TH RT SB LT Free TH RT Page 387 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 23 E. Denmark Avenue & Access D Table 16 shows the expected LOS, control delay, and 95th percentile queue length for Full Build 2030 conditions. Table 16 Full Build 2027 Intersection Approach Movement AM PM LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue Denmark Ave & Access D EB LT B 12.8 8' B 11.7 5' RT NB LT Free TH SB TH Free RT Denmark Avenue & Access D - looking north Page 388 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 24 VI. Summary and Conclusion This study serves as an analysis of the traffic impacts from the Vermillion Reserve development in Farmington, Minnesota. This analysis is intended to support the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Trip Generation The development is expected to generate 3,889 daily trips, with 83 entering trips and 229 exiting trips in the AM peak hour, and 237 entering and 146 exiting trips in the PM peak hour. Turn Lanes/Sight Distance The County has directed that right-turn lanes are required at accesses on county roads due to the size of development. Traffic Impacts Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W The County Road 31 and County Road 74 Study will examine intersection control options for the intersection of Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W. That study is ongoing and the County shared lane geometry for the Full Build scenario. Analysis shows that the intersection is expected to see LOS F for the Full Build scenario. Projected future volumes indicate that the intersection is expected to meet warrants for signalized control. It is recommended to monitor volumes at the intersection and implement signalized control when volumes meet warrants. Recommended Improvements Denmark Avenue & 220th Street W Monitor volumes and implement signalized control when volumes meet warrants. Denmark Avenue & Accesses C and D Construct southbound right-turn lanes with 300 feet of deceleration distance plus a 180-foot taper. Page 389 of 454 Vermillion Reserve – Farmington – Lennar Page 25 Appendix Background Information Traffic Volumes Trip Generation Capacity Analysis Turn Lane Analysis Traffic Signal Warrant Page 390 of 454 Background Information Page 391 of 454 County Road 31 and County Road 74 Study Project Overview COUNTY PROJECTS 31-115 AND 74-011 Recommend pedestrian/bicycle crossing locations and improvements (Denmark Ave) Evaluate intersection control types Develop a preferred design for a new Vermillion River bridge (Denmark Ave) including a grade separated greenway trail connection Review the corridors for access, safety, speed management, and mobility improvement opportunities Develop a layout to modernize the corridors with an urban section and non- motorized facilities Recommend stormwater management improvements PROJECT TIMELINE October 2024 to December 2024 Data Collection and Analysis January 2025 to August 2025 Alternatives Development September 2025 to October 2025 Recommendations and Preliminary Design Public Information Meeting #1 Public Information Meeting #2 WE ARE HERE Public Information Meeting #3 Project Location Map For more information Stay up to date by visiting www.dakotacounty.us and search ‘County Project 31-115’ or ‘County Project 74-11’ or scan the QR code. You can also contact the county’s project manager if you have questions: Project Contact: Hassan Hussein hassan.hussein@co.dakota.mn.us • 952-891-7105 Dakota County and the City of Farmington are conducting a corridor study of: ●County Road 31 (Denmark Avenue) from County Road 50 to County Road 74 ●County Road 74 (220th Street) from County Road 31 to Honeysuckle Lane As development continues in Farmington, these corridors will carry increasing traffic volumes and continue to provide access to adjacent residential, recreational, and institutional land uses. The corridor study will develop a vision for these corridors that will balance the needs of all users. STUDY GOALS Page 392 of 454 District DM Location ID 40165 County Dakota Located On CR 31 At CSAH74 (ASH ST) IN FARMINGTON Community -LRS ID 0700006594640031-I LRS Point 1.4430894 Generated 12/1/2025 Page 1 of 1 Minnesota Department of Transportation AADT and AADT Trucks by Year for 1/1/2015 - 12/31/2024 Criteria: Location ID = 40165, From 1/1/1900 To 12/31/2025 12:00:00 AM Pa g e 3 9 3 o f 4 5 4 Location 0 Year Count*Trend** 2016 1200 1100 2017 1300 1300 2018 1400 1400 2019 1400 1500 2020 1300 1600 2021 1700 1700 2022 1900 1800 2023 1900 1900 2024 2000 2000 2016 N/A 1100 2024 N/A 2000 105 2027 N/A 2300 87.04% 10.23% 5.00% 1-Dec-25 Traffic Trends - V2.0 CR 31 -- south of 220th County: Station #: Dakota 090026 Traffic (ADT/AADT) 2024 Mid-Year Trend CR 31 Trend R-squared: Highway: 2016 Opening Year Trend Straight Line Growth Option *Axle-Adjusted 2027 Design Year Trend TRANPLAN Forecasts/Trends ** Annual Trend Increase: Trend Growth Rate (2024 to Design Year): Printed: Trend Annual Historic Growth Rate: 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 Average Daily Traffic (Vehicles/Day) Year Observed Count Fitted Curve Pa g e 3 9 4 o f 4 5 4 Traffic Volumes Page 395 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denton Ave -- 220th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367101 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 9 2 6 0 3 33 0 2 29 10 0.710.71 27 10 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AMPeak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:15 AM -- 7:30 AMPeak 15-Min: 7:15 AM -- 7:30 AM 22.2 0 33.3 0 0 15.2 0 0 10.3 10 11.1 10 0 0 7.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denton AveDenton Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denton AveDenton Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) 220th St W220th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 220th St W220th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 6 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 9 0 0 17 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2 0 11 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 8 0 0 12 46 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 48 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 37 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 10 36 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 30 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 12 0 8 0 0 12 0 0 0 36 0 0 68 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 396 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denton Ave -- 220th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367102 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 3 6 0 0 3 11 0 6 17 22 0.660.66 11 22 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PMPeak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 18.2 0 0 11.8 4.5 18.2 4.5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denton AveDenton Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denton AveDenton Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) 220th St W220th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 220th St W220th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 6 1 0 16 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 3 3 0 12 39 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 6 42 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 36 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 7 27 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 19 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 24 4 0 64 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 397 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denmark Ave -- 220th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367103 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 210 236 19 78 113 31 10 134 168 2 0.960.96 11 14 2 23 153 1 92 38 103 131 Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AMPeak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AMPeak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AM 7.1 8.1 10.5 6.4 7.1 9.7 0 11.9 11.3 0 9.1 7.1 50 8.7 7.2 0 3.3 7.9 7.8 4.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) 220th St W220th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 220th St W220th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 7:00 AM 1 18 9 0 21 25 5 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 23 0 107 7:15 AM 0 19 11 0 19 19 5 0 4 2 1 0 7 4 37 0 128 7:30 AM 0 29 12 0 28 25 5 0 1 0 0 0 9 3 24 0 136 7:45 AM 1 22 9 0 26 14 6 0 2 0 1 0 3 3 38 0 125 496 8:00 AM 0 22 6 0 40 20 3 0 3 0 0 0 4 1 35 0 134 523 8:15 AM 0 16 7 0 27 13 3 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 26 0 98 493 8:30 AM 0 16 2 0 28 20 2 0 2 3 0 0 2 0 38 0 113 470 8:45 AM 0 7 5 0 21 16 1 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 23 0 79 424 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 116 48 0 112 100 20 0 4 0 0 0 36 12 96 0 544 Heavy Trucks 0 4 8 20 16 4 0 0 0 8 0 8 68 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 398 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denmark Ave -- 220th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367104 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 270 212 7 104 159 18 17 116 158 4 0.870.87 11 22 1 31 188 0 79 25 136 104 Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PMPeak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PM 1.5 2.4 14.3 1 1.3 5.6 0 1.7 1.3 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 0 3.8 8 0.7 4.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) 220th St W220th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 220th St W220th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 4:00 PM 0 25 8 0 45 36 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 34 0 160 4:15 PM 0 23 5 0 45 19 1 0 5 1 0 0 11 0 25 0 135 4:30 PM 0 16 2 0 31 27 3 0 7 2 0 0 5 4 33 0 130 4:45 PM 0 15 10 0 38 22 2 0 5 1 1 0 6 5 24 0 129 554 5:00 PM 0 10 9 0 33 30 2 0 3 0 0 0 8 1 31 0 127 521 5:15 PM 0 25 12 0 41 21 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 24 0 127 513 5:30 PM 0 20 2 0 30 13 0 0 6 0 0 0 11 2 28 0 112 495 5:45 PM 0 15 4 0 40 15 1 0 1 1 0 0 5 0 23 0 105 471 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 100 32 0 180 144 4 0 0 0 0 0 36 8 136 0 640 Heavy Trucks 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 399 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denmark Ave -- Church of St Michael/Senior Living Dwy QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367105 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 112 137 0 104 8 0 0 3 4 0 0.830.83 0 0 0 1 13 0 134 5 105 139 Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AMPeak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AMPeak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AM 12.5 8 0 12.5 12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.1 0 8.2 40 12.4 9.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) Church of St Michael/SeniorChurch of St Michael/Senior Living DwyLiving Dwy (Eastbound)(Eastbound) Church of St Michael/SeniorChurch of St Michael/Senior Living DwyLiving Dwy (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotals LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU 7:00 AM 0 30 2 0 1 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 65 7:15 AM 0 31 0 0 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 61 7:30 AM 0 42 1 0 1 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 7:45 AM 0 31 2 0 5 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 52 255 8:00 AM 0 28 1 0 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 242 8:15 AM 0 23 2 0 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 223 8:30 AM 0 16 0 0 3 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 38 184 8:45 AM 0 12 0 0 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 161 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 168 4 0 4 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 308 Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 400 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denmark Ave -- Church of St Michael/Senior Living Dwy QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367106 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Farmington, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 136 103 0 128 8 0 0 14 14 0 0.790.79 0 0 0 0 8 0 89 0 128 89 Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PMPeak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PM 0.7 2.9 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 0 0.8 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) Church of St Michael/SeniorChurch of St Michael/Senior Living DwyLiving Dwy (Eastbound)(Eastbound) Church of St Michael/SeniorChurch of St Michael/Senior Living DwyLiving Dwy (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotals LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU LeftLeft ThruThru RightRight UU 4:00 PM 0 27 0 0 6 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 76 4:15 PM 0 22 0 0 1 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 58 4:30 PM 0 17 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 52 4:45 PM 0 23 0 0 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 53 239 5:00 PM 0 15 0 0 3 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 53 216 5:15 PM 0 25 0 0 1 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 53 211 5:30 PM 0 20 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 47 206 5:45 PM 0 16 0 0 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 38 191 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 108 0 0 24 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 304 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 401 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: 218th St W -- 220th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367107 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Not Found, No DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 8 26 0 0 8 10 1 25 35 2 0.720.72 10 3 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AMPeak-Hour: 7:15 AM -- 8:15 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:15 AM -- 7:30 AMPeak 15-Min: 7:15 AM -- 7:30 AM 12.5 15.4 0 0 12.5 10 0 16 14.3 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At 218th St W218th St W (Northbound)(Northbound) 218th St W218th St W (Southbound)(Southbound) 220th St W220th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 220th St W220th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 9 0 16 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 11 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 9 40 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 10 46 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 6 36 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6 31 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 6 28 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 8 0 0 0 12 36 0 64 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 402 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: 218th St W -- 220th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367108 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Not Found, No DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 25 4 4 0 21 10 0 4 10 1 0.600.60 6 1 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PMPeak-Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 33.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At 218th St W218th St W (Northbound)(Northbound) 218th St W218th St W (Southbound)(Southbound) 220th St W220th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 220th St W220th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 15 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 9 33 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 36 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 32 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 23 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 28 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 8 0 60 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 403 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denmark Ave -- 225th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367109 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Dakota, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 88 117 3 85 0 3 7 0 0 0 0.800.80 0 7 0 0 0 0 110 0 85 110 Peak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AMPeak-Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8:00 AM Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AMPeak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 7:45 AM 9.1 6 0 9.4 0 0 14.3 0 0 0 0 14.3 0 0 0 0 5.5 0 9.4 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) 225th St W225th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 225th St W225th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 7:00 AM 0 23 0 0 0 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 7:15 AM 0 27 0 0 0 22 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 7:30 AM 0 32 0 0 0 27 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 7:45 AM 0 28 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 205 8:00 AM 0 24 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 197 8:15 AM 0 22 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 33 178 8:30 AM 0 14 0 0 0 14 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 145 8:45 AM 0 13 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 132 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 128 0 0 0 108 8 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 256 Heavy Trucks 0 8 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 404 of 454 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: LOCATION: Denmark Ave -- 225th St W QC JOB #: QC JOB #: 17367110 CITY/STATE: CITY/STATE: Dakota, MN DATE: DATE: Thu, Dec 11 2025 118 80 7 111 0 7 7 0 0 0 0.920.92 0 8 1 0 0 0 73 0 112 73 Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PMPeak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM Peak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PMPeak 15-Min: 4:00 PM -- 4:15 PM 2.5 5 0 2.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5 100 0 0 0 5.5 0 3.6 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15-Min Count15-Min CountPeriod Period Beginning AtBeginning At Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Northbound)(Northbound) Denmark AveDenmark Ave (Southbound)(Southbound) 225th St W225th St W (Eastbound)(Eastbound) 225th St W225th St W (Westbound)(Westbound)TotalTotal HourlyHourlyTotalsTotalsLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU 4:00 PM 0 20 0 0 0 32 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 4:15 PM 0 17 0 0 0 26 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 4:30 PM 0 18 0 0 0 28 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 51 4:45 PM 0 18 0 0 0 25 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 199 5:00 PM 0 10 0 0 0 29 2 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 45 190 5:15 PM 1 22 0 0 0 20 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 190 5:30 PM 0 15 0 0 0 21 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 180 5:45 PM 0 13 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 161 Peak 15-MinPeak 15-Min FlowratesFlowrates NorthboundNorthbound SouthboundSouthbound EastboundEastbound WestboundWestbound TotalTotalLeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUULeftLeftThruThruRightRightUU All Vehicles 0 80 0 0 0 128 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Buses Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scooters Comments: Report generated on 12/17/2025 11:30 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Page 405 of 454 CSAH 31 & CSAH 74 10/8/24 700 Video #:700 Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds 12:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 AM 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 AM 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15 AM 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 AM 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 AM 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 AM 1 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 AM 3 2 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 5 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 AM 3 3 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 5:30 AM 8 7 0 0 2 0 14 0 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 AM 13 3 0 0 2 0 17 0 0 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 AM 14 11 1 0 0 2 16 0 0 10 3 0 0 1 0 0 6:15 AM 13 10 0 0 6 0 24 0 0 15 6 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 AM 16 14 0 0 7 2 40 0 1 15 1 0 2 0 0 0 6:45 AM 17 25 1 0 15 2 32 0 1 16 8 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 AM 25 22 2 0 2 0 37 0 2 15 9 0 0 1 1 0 7:15 AM 27 17 0 0 12 0 38 0 2 27 12 0 0 3 0 0 7:30 AM 40 29 0 0 6 0 45 0 0 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 30 15 1 0 12 2 52 0 2 21 11 0 0 2 0 0 8:00 AM 37 16 2 0 8 1 43 0 0 19 7 0 1 0 0 0 8:15 AM 34 21 1 0 6 0 41 0 0 19 9 0 1 0 0 0 8:30 AM 27 17 1 0 5 1 36 0 0 17 5 0 0 1 0 0 8:45 AM 29 13 0 0 5 0 15 0 0 9 7 0 2 0 0 0 9:00 AM 31 9 1 0 5 0 31 0 0 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 CSAH 31 CSAH 74 CSAH 31 CSAH 74 Comment 2: CSAH 74 Comment 3:0 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Comment 1: File Name: Start Date: Start Time: 6:00:00 AM Synchro ID: Pa g e 4 0 6 o f 4 5 4 9:15 AM 26 9 0 0 7 0 28 0 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 AM 17 10 0 0 3 0 23 0 1 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 9:45 AM 28 14 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 AM 26 13 0 0 1 2 22 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 AM 22 13 0 0 5 0 22 0 0 10 6 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 AM 18 13 0 0 6 0 15 0 0 8 5 0 1 1 0 0 10:45 AM 18 9 0 0 6 1 20 0 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 AM 23 13 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 21 10 1 0 3 1 22 0 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 22 15 0 0 4 3 21 0 0 10 7 0 0 0 1 0 11:45 AM 20 13 0 0 1 2 17 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 25 15 1 0 6 1 29 0 0 8 10 0 0 1 1 0 12:15 PM 27 8 0 0 4 0 24 0 0 12 6 1 1 0 0 0 12:30 PM 31 14 0 0 8 0 24 0 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 21 13 2 0 9 2 14 0 0 10 4 0 2 1 0 0 1:00 PM 25 13 0 0 7 3 20 0 0 14 12 0 0 1 0 0 1:15 PM 20 10 0 0 5 0 22 0 1 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 PM 28 12 0 0 4 1 23 0 0 11 4 0 0 1 1 0 1:45 PM 23 12 0 0 3 0 23 0 1 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 PM 24 14 0 0 5 2 26 0 0 13 6 0 1 1 0 0 2:15 PM 42 26 1 0 8 1 28 0 1 14 4 0 0 1 0 0 2:30 PM 35 14 1 0 6 1 29 0 0 19 9 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 PM 51 21 0 0 9 1 26 0 0 19 8 0 0 0 1 0 3:00 PM 57 23 0 0 7 1 30 0 0 18 11 0 0 1 0 0 3:15 PM 52 30 2 0 6 2 38 0 0 17 9 0 1 2 0 0 3:30 PM 65 28 1 0 15 1 38 0 0 22 7 1 0 1 0 1 3:45 PM 55 22 1 0 5 2 29 0 0 23 5 0 3 0 2 0 4:00 PM 53 32 0 0 11 1 56 0 0 23 7 0 1 1 1 0 4:15 PM 56 31 1 0 7 1 30 0 0 25 12 0 0 1 0 0 4:30 PM 41 19 0 0 4 0 49 0 0 23 3 0 0 1 0 0 4:45 PM 46 22 0 0 11 2 32 0 1 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 46 17 0 0 9 0 37 0 0 22 4 0 1 0 0 0 5:15 PM 44 31 1 0 5 1 31 0 0 22 8 0 1 1 0 0 5:30 PM 37 20 0 0 5 0 33 0 0 25 5 0 0 0 1 0 5:45 PM 31 11 0 0 3 0 43 0 0 9 9 0 1 0 0 0 6:00 PM 31 16 0 0 5 0 26 0 0 12 5 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 35 25 0 0 4 1 25 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 1 0 6:30 PM 28 16 0 0 4 0 18 0 0 14 6 1 1 0 0 0 6:45 PM 31 14 0 0 5 0 22 0 1 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 PM 30 15 0 0 7 0 26 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 1 7:15 PM 25 10 0 0 5 0 11 0 0 8 5 0 0 2 0 0 7:30 PM 14 12 0 0 1 2 7 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 PM 12 9 0 0 5 1 7 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 PM 17 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 PM 17 13 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 PM 18 9 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 PM 19 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 PM 10 2 1 0 1 0 15 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pa g e 4 0 7 o f 4 5 4 9:15 PM 15 3 2 0 1 1 12 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 PM 7 4 0 0 2 1 10 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 PM 5 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 PM 7 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 PM 6 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 10:30 PM 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 PM 6 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 PM 2 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 PM 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 PM 5 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 PM 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1910 1020 26 0 345 50 1712 0 15 899 380 3 23 25 10 3 Peak Start Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds AM Peak SIM 1 7:30 AM 40 29 0 0 6 0 45 0 0 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 AM Peak SIM 2 7:45 AM 30 15 1 0 12 2 52 0 2 21 11 0 0 2 0 0 AM Peak SIM 3 8:00 AM 37 16 2 0 8 1 43 0 0 19 7 0 1 0 0 0 AM Peak SIM 4 8:15 AM 34 21 1 0 6 0 41 0 0 19 9 0 1 0 0 0 AM Peak SIM 5 8:30 AM 27 17 1 0 5 1 36 0 0 17 5 0 0 1 0 0 MID Peak SIM 1 12:00 PM 25 15 1 0 6 1 29 0 0 8 10 0 0 1 1 0 MID Peak SIM 2 12:15 PM 27 8 0 0 4 0 24 0 0 12 6 1 1 0 0 0 MID Peak SIM 3 12:30 PM 31 14 0 0 8 0 24 0 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 MID Peak SIM 4 12:45 PM 21 13 2 0 9 2 14 0 0 10 4 0 2 1 0 0 MID Peak SIM 5 1:00 PM 25 13 0 0 7 3 20 0 0 14 12 0 0 1 0 0 PM Peak SIM 1 3:15 PM 52 30 2 0 6 2 38 0 0 17 9 0 1 2 0 0 PM Peak SIM 2 3:30 PM 65 28 1 0 15 1 38 0 0 22 7 1 0 1 0 1 PM Peak SIM 3 3:45 PM 55 22 1 0 5 2 29 0 0 23 5 0 3 0 2 0 PM Peak SIM 4 4:00 PM 53 32 0 0 11 1 56 0 0 23 7 0 1 1 1 0 PM Peak SIM 5 4:15 PM 56 31 1 0 7 1 30 0 0 25 12 0 0 1 0 0 Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds AM Peak 60 7:45 AM 128 69 5 0 31 4 172 0 2 76 32 0 2 3 0 0 MID Peak 60 12:15 PM 104 48 2 0 28 5 82 0 0 48 28 1 3 2 0 0 PM Peak 60 3:30 PM 229 113 3 0 38 5 153 0 0 93 31 1 4 3 3 1 Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds AM PHF 0.86 0.82 0.63 #DIV/0!0.65 0.50 0.83 #DIV/0!0.25 0.90 0.73 #DIV/0!0.50 0.38 #DIV/0!#DIV/0! MID PHF 0.84 0.86 0.25 #DIV/0!0.78 0.42 0.85 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!0.86 0.58 0.25 0.38 0.50 #DIV/0!#DIV/0! PM PHF 0.88 0.88 0.75 #DIV/0!0.63 0.63 0.68 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!0.93 0.65 0.25 0.33 0.75 0.38 0.25 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pa g e 4 0 8 o f 4 5 4 Turning Movement Volume: Detail 1/9/2026Report File: C:\...\vistro am.pdf Scenario 1 amVistro File: C:\...\verm vistro.vistro Vermillion reserve - Farmington 544 0 160 0 - 255 Total Volume 5 0 0 0 1.50 3 Right 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Thru 2 0 0 0 1.50 1 Left Westbound 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 28 0 28 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 10 0 10 0 1.50 0 Right 190 0 34 0 1.50 104 Thru 12 0 0 0 1.50 8 Left Southbound 8 0 0 0 1.50 5 Right 285 0 84 0 1.50 134 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & Access C4 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 113 0 43 0 - 46 Total Volume 38 0 0 0 1.50 25 Right 15 0 0 0 1.50 10 Thru 11 0 11 0 1.50 0 Left Westbound 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Right 3 0 0 0 1.50 2 Thru 2 0 0 0 1.50 1 Left Eastbound 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Right 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Thru 12 0 0 0 1.50 8 Left Southbound 30 0 30 0 1.50 0 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 220th St & Access A3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 159 0 86 0 - 48 Total Volume 3 0 0 0 1.50 2 Right 52 0 11 0 1.50 27 Thru 11 0 11 0 1.50 0 Left Westbound 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Right 45 0 30 0 1.50 10 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 9 0 0 0 1.50 6 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 5 0 0 0 1.50 3 Left Southbound 30 0 30 0 1.50 0 Right 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Thru 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 220th St & Access B2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 1035 0 233 0 - 533 Total Volume 201 0 0 0 1.50 134 Right 26 0 9 0 1.50 11 Thru 53 0 18 0 1.50 23 Left Westbound 7 0 4 0 1.50 2 Right 27 0 24 0 1.50 2 Thru 46 0 31 0 1.50 10 Left Eastbound 41 0 12 0 1.50 19 Right 139 0 22 0 1.50 78 Thru 185 0 0 0 1.50 123 Left Southbound 107 0 50 0 1.50 38 Right 199 0 61 0 1.50 92 Thru 4 0 2 0 1.50 1 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & 220th St1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Vermillion reserve - Farmington Traffic Impact Group Version 2022 (SP 0-12) Generated with Page 409 of 454 58 0 42 0 - 10 Total Volume 11 0 11 0 1.50 0 Right 6 0 1 0 1.50 3 Thru Westbound 11 0 0 0 1.50 7 Thru 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Right 29 0 29 0 1.50 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 225th St & Access E8 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 98 0 82 0 - 10 Total Volume 11 0 11 0 1.50 0 Right 16 0 11 0 1.50 3 Thru Westbound 40 0 29 0 1.50 7 Thru 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Right 30 0 30 0 1.50 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 225th St & Access F7 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 490 0 123 0 - 244 Total Volume 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Right 28 0 28 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 10 0 10 0 1.50 0 Right 184 0 26 0 1.50 105 Thru Southbound 265 0 56 0 1.50 139 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & Access D6 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 401 0 92 0 - 205 Total Volume 4 0 4 0 1.50 0 Right 65 0 54 0 1.50 7 Left Eastbound 25 0 20 0 1.50 3 Right 137 0 9 0 1.50 85 Thru Southbound 168 0 3 0 1.50 110 Thru 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & 225th St5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Vermillion reserve - Farmington Traffic Impact Group Version 2022 (SP 0-12) Generated with Page 410 of 454 Turning Movement Volume: Detail 1/9/2026Report File: C:\...\vistro pm.pdf Scenario 2 pmVistro File: C:\...\verm vistro.vistro Vermillion reserve - Farmington 564 0 205 0 - 239 Total Volume 21 0 0 0 1.50 14 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Left Westbound 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 18 0 18 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 31 0 31 0 1.50 0 Right 284 0 92 0 1.50 128 Thru 12 0 0 0 1.50 8 Left Southbound 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Right 192 0 58 0 1.50 89 Thru 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & Access C4 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 112 0 57 0 - 36 Total Volume 6 0 0 0 1.50 4 Right 9 0 0 0 1.50 6 Thru 33 0 33 0 1.50 0 Left Westbound 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Right 2 0 0 0 1.50 1 Thru 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 6 0 0 0 1.50 4 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 32 0 0 0 1.50 21 Left Southbound 20 0 20 0 1.50 0 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 220th St & Access A3 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 172 0 108 0 - 42 Total Volume 9 0 0 0 1.50 6 Right 49 0 32 0 1.50 11 Thru 33 0 33 0 1.50 0 Left Westbound 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Right 52 0 19 0 1.50 22 Thru 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Right 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Thru 5 0 0 0 1.50 3 Left Southbound 20 0 20 0 1.50 0 Right 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Thru 0 0 0 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 220th St & Access B2 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 1130 0 295 0 - 554 Total Volume 174 0 0 0 1.50 116 Right 43 0 26 0 1.50 11 Thru 101 0 54 0 1.50 31 Left Westbound 5 0 3 0 1.50 1 Right 22 0 16 0 1.50 4 Thru 46 0 20 0 1.50 17 Left Eastbound 45 0 34 0 1.50 7 Right 222 0 66 0 1.50 104 Thru 239 0 0 0 1.50 159 Left Southbound 71 0 33 0 1.50 25 Right 158 0 39 0 1.50 79 Thru 4 0 4 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & 220th St1 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Vermillion reserve - Farmington Traffic Impact Group Version 2022 (SP 0-12) Generated with Page 411 of 454 77 0 54 0 - 15 Total Volume 31 0 31 0 1.50 0 Right 12 0 1 0 1.50 7 Thru Westbound 13 0 1 0 1.50 8 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Right 19 0 19 0 1.50 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 225th St & Access E8 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 126 0 103 0 - 15 Total Volume 32 0 32 0 1.50 0 Right 42 0 31 0 1.50 7 Thru Westbound 31 0 19 0 1.50 8 Thru 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 1 0 1 0 1.50 0 Right 19 0 19 0 1.50 0 Left Southbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base 225th St & Access F7 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 484 0 158 0 - 217 Total Volume 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Right 18 0 18 0 1.50 0 Left Eastbound 31 0 31 0 1.50 0 Right 255 0 63 0 1.50 128 Thru Southbound 176 0 42 0 1.50 89 Thru 2 0 2 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & Access D6 Volume TypeIntersection NameID 417 0 116 0 - 199 Total Volume 5 0 3 0 1.50 1 Right 46 0 35 0 1.50 7 Left Eastbound 69 0 58 0 1.50 7 Right 173 0 6 0 1.50 111 Thru Southbound 119 0 9 0 1.50 73 Thru 5 0 5 0 1.50 0 Left Northbound Future Total Other Net New Trips In Process Growth Factor Final Base Denmark Ave & 225th St5 Volume TypeIntersection NameID Vermillion reserve - Farmington Traffic Impact Group Version 2022 (SP 0-12) Generated with Page 412 of 454 Trip Generation Page 413 of 454 Project Name:Farmington Vermillion No: Date:11/25/2025 City:Farmington State/Province:MN Zip/Postal Code: Country:Vermillion 2 Client Name:Lennar Analyst's Name:SPI Edition:Trip Generation Manual, 12th Ed Land Use Size Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing (General Urban/Suburban) 370 Dwelling Units 1626 1625 68 185 199 122 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non-pass-by 1626 1625 68 185 199 122 Total 1626 1625 68 185 199 122 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non-pass-by 1626 1625 68 185 199 122 Project Information daily am pm Page 414 of 454 Capacity Analysis Page 415 of 454 Existing Conditions Page 416 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing AM 3: Denmark Ave & 220th St W 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/18/2025 Existing AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 2 2 23 11 134 1 92 38 113 78 19 Future Vol, veh/h 10 2 2 23 11 134 1 92 38 113 78 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -----0 ------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 10 9 9 12 0 3 8 7 6 11 Mvmt Flow 10 2 2 24 11 140 1 96 40 118 81 20 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 521 465 91 447 455 116 101 0 0 136 0 0 Stage 1 327 327 - 118 118 ------- Stage 2 194 138 - 329 337 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.3 7.19 6.59 6.32 4.1 -- 4.17 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.39 3.581 4.081 3.408 2.2 -- 2.263 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 469 498 945 510 491 910 1504 -- 1418 -- Stage 1 690 651 - 870 785 ------- Stage 2 812 786 - 669 629 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 363 454 945 473 447 910 1504 -- 1418 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 363 454 - 473 447 ------- Stage 1 689 594 - 869 784 ------- Stage 2 677 785 - 607 574 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.1 10.4 0.1 4.2 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1504 -- 411 464 910 1418 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 -- 0.035 0.076 0.153 0.083 -- HCM Control Delay (s)7.4 0 - 14.1 13.4 9.7 7.8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A -B B A A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -- 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 -- Page 417 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing AM 6: Denmark Ave & drwy 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/18/2025 Existing AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 3 134 5 8 104 Future Vol, veh/h 1 3 134 5 8 104 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -0 --0 Grade, %0 -0 --0 Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 8 40 13 13 Mvmt Flow 1 4 161 6 10 125 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 309 164 0 0 167 0 Stage 1 164 ----- Stage 2 145 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 -- 4.23 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 -- 2.317 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 687 886 -- 1347 - Stage 1 870 ----- Stage 2 887 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 682 886 -- 1347 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 682 ----- Stage 1 870 ----- Stage 2 880 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 0 0.5 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)-- 824 1347 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio -- 0.006 0.007 - HCM Control Delay (s)-- 9.4 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS --A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)--0 0 - Page 418 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing AM 11: Denmark Ave & 225th St W 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/18/2025 Existing AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 110 85 3 Future Vol, veh/h 7 0 0 110 85 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 --0 0 - Grade, %0 --0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, %10 0 0 6 9 0 Mvmt Flow 9 0 0 138 106 4 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 246 108 110 0 -0 Stage 1 108 ----- Stage 2 138 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.5 6.2 4.1 --- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.5 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.5 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.59 3.3 2.2 --- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 725 951 1493 --- Stage 1 897 ----- Stage 2 869 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 725 951 1493 --- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 725 ----- Stage 1 897 ----- Stage 2 869 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1493 - 725 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio -- 0.012 -- HCM Control Delay (s)0 -10 -- HCM Lane LOS A -B -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -0 -- Page 419 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing AM 13: 220th St W & Denton Ave 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/18/2025 Existing AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 10 27 2 3 6 Future Vol, veh/h 0 10 27 2 3 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length ----0 - Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 Heavy Vehicles, %0 10 11 0 0 33 Mvmt Flow 0 14 38 3 4 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 41 0 -0 54 40 Stage 1 ----40 - Stage 2 ----14 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 --- 6.4 6.53 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---- 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ---- 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 --- 3.5 3.597 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1581 --- 959 950 Stage 1 ---- 988 - Stage 2 ---- 1014 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1581 --- 959 950 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ---- 959 - Stage 1 ---- 988 - Stage 2 ---- 1014 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1581 --- 953 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---- 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s)0 --- 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A ---A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 ---0 Page 420 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing AM 16: 220th St W & 218th St 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/18/2025 Existing AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 2 10 25 8 0 Future Vol, veh/h 1 2 10 25 8 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length ----0 - Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 10 16 13 0 Mvmt Flow 1 3 14 35 11 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 49 0 -0 37 32 Stage 1 ----32 - Stage 2 ----5 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 --- 6.53 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---- 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ---- 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 --- 3.617 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1571 --- 948 1048 Stage 1 ---- 963 - Stage 2 ---- 990 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1571 --- 947 1048 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ---- 947 - Stage 1 ---- 962 - Stage 2 ---- 990 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.4 0 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1571 --- 947 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 --- 0.012 HCM Control Delay (s)7.3 0 -- 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A --A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 ---0 Page 421 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing PM 3: Denmark Ave & 220th St W 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 3:03 pm 12/18/2025 Existing PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 4 1 31 11 116 0 79 25 159 104 7 Future Vol, veh/h 17 4 1 31 11 116 0 79 25 159 104 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -----0 ------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 17 0 4 8 1 1 10 Mvmt Flow 20 5 1 36 13 133 0 91 29 183 120 8 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 669 610 124 599 600 106 128 0 0 120 0 0 Stage 1 490 490 - 106 106 ------- Stage 2 179 120 - 493 494 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.37 4.1 -- 4.11 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.453 2.2 -- 2.209 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 374 412 932 416 417 909 1470 -- 1474 -- Stage 1 564 552 - 905 811 ------- Stage 2 827 800 - 562 550 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 279 357 932 369 361 909 1470 -- 1474 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 279 357 - 369 361 ------- Stage 1 564 478 - 905 811 ------- Stage 2 695 800 - 481 476 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.1 11.4 0 4.6 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1470 -- 301 367 909 1474 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio --- 0.084 0.132 0.147 0.124 -- HCM Control Delay (s)0 -- 18.1 16.3 9.6 7.8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A --C C A A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -- 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 -- Page 422 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing PM 6: Denmark Ave & drwy 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 3:03 pm 12/18/2025 Existing PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 14 89 0 8 128 Future Vol, veh/h 0 14 89 0 8 128 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 -0 --0 Grade, %0 -0 --0 Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 3 0 0 1 Mvmt Flow 0 18 113 0 10 162 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 295 113 0 0 113 0 Stage 1 113 ----- Stage 2 182 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 -- 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 -- 2.2 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 700 945 -- 1489 - Stage 1 917 ----- Stage 2 854 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 695 945 -- 1489 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 695 ----- Stage 1 917 ----- Stage 2 848 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)-- 945 1489 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio -- 0.019 0.007 - HCM Control Delay (s)-- 8.9 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS --A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)-- 0.1 0 - Page 423 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing PM 11: Denmark Ave & 225th St W 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 3:03 pm 12/18/2025 Existing PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 1 0 73 111 7 Future Vol, veh/h 7 1 0 73 111 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 --0 0 - Grade, %0 --0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %0 10 0 6 3 0 Mvmt Flow 8 1 0 79 121 8 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 204 125 129 0 -0 Stage 1 125 ----- Stage 2 79 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.3 4.1 --- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.39 2.2 --- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 789 905 1469 --- Stage 1 906 ----- Stage 2 949 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 789 905 1469 --- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 789 ----- Stage 1 906 ----- Stage 2 949 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.5 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1469 - 802 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio -- 0.011 -- HCM Control Delay (s)0 - 9.5 -- HCM Lane LOS A -A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -0 -- Page 424 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing PM 13: 220th St W & Denton Ave 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 3:03 pm 12/18/2025 Existing PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 22 11 6 3 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 22 11 6 3 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length ----0 - Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 Heavy Vehicles, %0 5 18 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 33 17 9 5 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 26 0 -0 55 22 Stage 1 ----22 - Stage 2 ----33 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 --- 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---- 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ---- 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 --- 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1601 --- 958 1061 Stage 1 ---- 1006 - Stage 2 ---- 995 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1601 --- 958 1061 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ---- 958 - Stage 1 ---- 1006 - Stage 2 ---- 995 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1601 --- 958 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---- 0.005 HCM Control Delay (s)0 --- 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A ---A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 ---0 Page 425 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Existing PM 16: 220th St W & 218th St 12/22/2025 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 3:03 pm 12/18/2025 Existing PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 1 6 4 21 4 Future Vol, veh/h 0 1 6 4 21 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length ----0 - Veh in Median Storage, # -0 0 -0 - Grade, %-0 0 -0 - Peak Hour Factor 60 60 60 60 60 60 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 33 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 2 10 7 35 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 17 0 -0 16 14 Stage 1 ----14 - Stage 2 ----2 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 --- 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ---- 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ---- 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 --- 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1613 --- 1008 1072 Stage 1 ---- 1014 - Stage 2 ---- 1026 - Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1613 --- 1008 1072 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ---- 1008 - Stage 1 ---- 1014 - Stage 2 ---- 1026 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 8.7 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1613 --- 1018 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ---- 0.041 HCM Control Delay (s)0 --- 8.7 HCM Lane LOS A ---A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 --- 0.1 Page 426 of 454 Full Build Conditions Page 427 of 454 Queuing and Blocking Report Full build AM 04/29/2026 full build am Vermillion Reserve - Farmington SimTraffic Report SPI Page 1 Intersection: 3: Denmark Ave & 220th St W Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L TR L Maximum Queue (ft)64 22 89 127 20 31 72 Average Queue (ft)28 4 41 58 1 3 32 95th Queue (ft)46 18 74 101 7 13 63 Link Distance (ft)504 307 307 758 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Denmark Ave & Access C/drwy Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT Maximum Queue (ft)46 30 28 Average Queue (ft)15 4 2 95th Queue (ft)35 21 13 Link Distance (ft)123 145 758 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Denmark Ave & Access D Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)23 Average Queue (ft)15 95th Queue (ft)33 Link Distance (ft)94 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Page 428 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full build AM 3: Denmark Ave & 220th St W 04/29/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 04/29/2026 Full build AM HCM 7th TWSC SPI Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 27 7 53 26 201 4 199 107 185 139 41 Future Vol, veh/h 46 27 7 53 26 201 4 199 107 185 139 41 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 200 --0 200 -- 200 - 200 Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 10 9 9 12 0 3 8 7 6 11 Mvmt Flow 48 28 7 55 27 209 4 207 111 193 145 43 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 759 857 145 816 844 263 188 0 0 319 0 0 Stage 1 530 530 - 271 271 ------- Stage 2 229 327 - 544 573 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.3 7.19 6.59 6.32 4.1 -- 4.17 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.39 3.581 4.081 3.408 2.2 -- 2.263 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 297 882 288 292 752 1399 -- 1214 -- Stage 1 536 530 - 719 672 ------- Stage 2 778 651 - 511 493 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 178 249 882 216 245 752 1399 -- 1214 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 178 249 - 216 245 ------- Stage 1 451 446 - 717 670 ------- Stage 2 537 649 - 399 414 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 31.65 16.79 0.1 4.32 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1399 -- 199 882 225 752 1214 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 -- 0.382 0.008 0.366 0.278 0.159 -- HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)7.6 -- 33.8 9.1 29.9 11.6 8.5 -- HCM Lane LOS A --D A D B A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -- 1.7 0 1.6 1.1 0.6 -- Page 429 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full build AM 6: Denmark Ave & Access C/drwy 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full build AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 1 2 2 0 5 1 285 8 12 190 10 Future Vol, veh/h 28 1 2 2 0 5 1 285 8 12 190 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 40 13 13 0 Mvmt Flow 34 1 2 2 0 6 1 343 10 14 229 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 616 618 235 615 619 348 241 0 0 353 0 0 Stage 1 263 263 - 350 350 ------- Stage 2 353 355 - 265 269 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 -- 4.23 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 -- 2.317 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 406 408 809 406 407 700 1337 -- 1147 -- Stage 1 747 694 - 671 636 ------- Stage 2 668 633 - 745 690 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 398 402 809 399 401 700 1337 -- 1147 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 398 402 - 399 401 ------- Stage 1 746 684 - 670 635 ------- Stage 2 662 632 - 731 680 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.6 11.3 0 0.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1337 -- 412 576 1147 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 -- 0.091 0.015 0.013 -- HCM Control Delay (s)7.7 0 - 14.6 11.3 8.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A -B B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -- 0.3 0 0 -- Page 430 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full build AM 9: Denmark Ave & Access D 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full build AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 2 1 265 184 10 Future Vol, veh/h 28 2 1 265 184 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 --0 0 - Grade, %0 --0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 6 9 0 Mvmt Flow 35 3 1 331 230 13 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 570 237 243 0 -0 Stage 1 237 ----- Stage 2 333 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 --- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 --- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 486 807 1335 --- Stage 1 807 ----- Stage 2 731 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 486 807 1335 --- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 486 ----- Stage 1 806 ----- Stage 2 731 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1335 - 499 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.075 -- HCM Control Delay (s)7.7 0 12.8 -- HCM Lane LOS A A B -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 - 0.2 -- Page 431 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full build AM 11: Denmark Ave & 225th St W 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full build AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 4 2 168 137 25 Future Vol, veh/h 65 4 2 168 137 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 --0 0 - Grade, %0 --0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 80 80 80 80 80 80 Heavy Vehicles, %10 0 0 6 9 0 Mvmt Flow 81 5 3 210 171 31 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 403 187 202 0 -0 Stage 1 187 ----- Stage 2 216 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.5 6.2 4.1 --- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.5 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.5 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.59 3.3 2.2 --- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 588 860 1382 --- Stage 1 826 ----- Stage 2 801 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 587 860 1382 --- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 587 ----- Stage 1 824 ----- Stage 2 801 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1382 - 598 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.144 -- HCM Control Delay (s)7.6 0 12 -- HCM Lane LOS A A B -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 - 0.5 -- Page 432 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full build AM 13: Access B/Denton Ave & 220th St W 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full build AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 45 0 11 52 3 0 2 30 5 1 9 Future Vol, veh/h 1 45 0 11 52 3 0 2 30 5 1 9 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 Heavy Vehicles, %0 10 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 Mvmt Flow 1 63 0 15 73 4 0 3 42 7 1 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 77 0 0 63 0 0 177 172 63 193 170 75 Stage 1 ------65 65 - 105 105 - Stage 2 ------ 112 107 -88 65 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -- 4.1 -- 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.53 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 -- 2.2 -- 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.597 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1535 -- 1553 -- 790 725 1007 771 727 907 Stage 1 ------ 951 845 - 906 812 - Stage 2 ------ 898 811 - 925 845 - Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1535 -- 1553 -- 771 717 1007 730 719 907 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ 771 717 - 730 719 - Stage 1 ------ 950 844 - 905 804 - Stage 2 ------ 875 803 - 882 844 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1.2 8.8 9.5 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)982 1535 -- 1553 -- 826 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.001 -- 0.01 -- 0.026 HCM Control Delay (s)8.8 7.3 0 - 7.3 0 - 9.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A -A A -A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 0 --0 -- 0.1 Page 433 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full build AM 16: Access A/218th St & 220th St W 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full build AM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 3 0 11 15 38 1 1 30 12 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 3 0 11 15 38 1 1 30 12 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 10 16 0 0 0 13 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 4 0 15 21 53 1 1 42 17 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 74 0 0 4 0 0 88 114 4 110 88 48 Stage 1 ------10 10 -78 78 - Stage 2 ------78 104 -32 10 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -- 4.1 -- 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.23 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.23 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.23 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 -- 2.2 -- 3.5 4 3.3 3.617 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1538 -- 1631 -- 902 780 1085 843 806 1027 Stage 1 ------ 1016 891 - 904 834 - Stage 2 ------ 936 813 - 957 891 - Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1538 -- 1631 -- 894 771 1085 803 796 1027 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ 894 771 - 803 796 - Stage 1 ------ 1014 889 - 902 826 - Stage 2 ------ 927 805 - 917 889 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.9 1.2 8.5 9.6 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1064 1538 -- 1631 -- 803 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 0.002 -- 0.009 -- 0.021 HCM Control Delay (s)8.5 7.3 0 - 7.2 0 - 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A -A A -A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 0 --0 -- 0.1 Page 434 of 454 Queuing and Blocking Report Full Build PM 04/29/2026 full build pm Vermillion Reserve - Farmington SimTraffic Report SPI Page 1 Intersection: 3: Denmark Ave & 220th St W Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served LT R LT R L L Maximum Queue (ft)48 21 141 131 20 119 Average Queue (ft)29 5 56 62 1 39 95th Queue (ft)50 20 91 110 7 76 Link Distance (ft)504 307 307 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)200 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 6: Denmark Ave & Access C/drwy Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT Maximum Queue (ft)48 31 24 Average Queue (ft)15 14 2 95th Queue (ft)35 39 11 Link Distance (ft)123 145 758 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Denmark Ave & Access D Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft)23 Average Queue (ft)12 95th Queue (ft)31 Link Distance (ft)94 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Page 435 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full Build PM 3: Denmark Ave & 220th St W 04/29/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 04/29/2026 Full Build PM HCM 7th TWSC SPI Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 30.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 22 5 101 43 174 5 158 71 239 222 45 Future Vol, veh/h 46 22 5 101 43 174 5 158 71 239 222 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length -- 200 --0 200 -- 200 - 200 Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 17 0 4 8 1 1 10 Mvmt Flow 53 25 6 116 49 200 6 182 82 275 255 52 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1022 1079 255 1051 1090 222 307 0 0 263 0 0 Stage 1 805 805 - 234 234 ------- Stage 2 218 275 - 817 856 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.37 4.1 -- 4.11 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.453 2.2 -- 2.209 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 216 220 788 207 217 781 1265 -- 1307 -- Stage 1 379 398 - 774 715 ------- Stage 2 789 686 - 373 377 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 96 173 788 142 170 781 1265 -- 1307 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 96 173 - 142 170 ------- Stage 1 300 315 - 770 712 ------- Stage 2 544 683 - 269 298 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 85.16 80.95 0.17 4.01 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1265 -- 112 788 150 781 1307 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 -- 0.699 0.007 1.107 0.256 0.21 -- HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)7.9 -- 90.7 9.6 165.2 11.2 8.5 -- HCM Lane LOS A --F A F B A -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -- 3.7 0 8.9 1 0.8 -- Page 436 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full Build PM 6: Denmark Ave & Access C/drwy 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full Build PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 1 2 0 1 21 2 192 0 12 284 31 Future Vol, veh/h 18 1 2 0 1 21 2 192 0 12 284 31 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Mvmt Flow 23 1 3 0 1 27 3 243 0 15 359 39 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 672 658 379 660 677 243 398 0 0 243 0 0 Stage 1 409 409 - 249 249 ------- Stage 2 263 249 - 411 428 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 -- 4.1 -- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 -- 2.2 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 372 387 672 379 377 801 1172 -- 1335 -- Stage 1 623 600 - 759 704 ------- Stage 2 747 704 - 622 588 ------- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 354 380 672 371 370 801 1172 -- 1335 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 354 380 - 371 370 ------- Stage 1 621 591 - 757 702 ------- Stage 2 719 702 - 609 579 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.4 9.9 0.1 0.3 HCM LOS C A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1172 -- 372 761 1335 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 -- 0.071 0.037 0.011 -- HCM Control Delay (s)8.1 0 - 15.4 9.9 7.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A -C A A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 -- 0.2 0.1 0 -- Page 437 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full Build PM 9: Denmark Ave & Access D 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full Build PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 2 2 176 255 31 Future Vol, veh/h 18 2 2 176 255 31 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 --0 0 - Grade, %0 --0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 6 3 0 Mvmt Flow 20 2 2 191 277 34 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 489 294 311 0 -0 Stage 1 294 ----- Stage 2 195 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 --- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 --- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 542 750 1261 --- Stage 1 761 ----- Stage 2 843 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 541 750 1261 --- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 541 ----- Stage 1 759 ----- Stage 2 843 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.7 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1261 - 557 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.039 -- HCM Control Delay (s)7.9 0 11.7 -- HCM Lane LOS A A B -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 - 0.1 -- Page 438 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full Build PM 11: Denmark Ave & 225th St W 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full Build PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 5 5 119 173 69 Future Vol, veh/h 46 5 5 119 173 69 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 --0 0 - Grade, %0 --0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %0 10 0 6 3 0 Mvmt Flow 50 5 5 129 188 75 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 365 226 263 0 -0 Stage 1 226 ----- Stage 2 139 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.3 4.1 --- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.39 2.2 --- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 639 794 1313 --- Stage 1 816 ----- Stage 2 893 ----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 636 794 1313 --- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 636 ----- Stage 1 813 ----- Stage 2 893 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.1 0.3 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1313 - 649 -- HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - 0.085 -- HCM Control Delay (s)7.8 0 11.1 -- HCM Lane LOS A A B -- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0 - 0.3 -- Page 439 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full Build PM 13: Access B/Denton Ave & 220th St W 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full Build PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 52 0 33 48 9 0 1 20 5 2 1 Future Vol, veh/h 0 52 0 33 48 9 0 1 20 5 2 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 Heavy Vehicles, %0 5 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 79 0 50 73 14 0 2 30 8 3 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 87 0 0 79 0 0 262 266 79 275 259 80 Stage 1 ------79 79 - 180 180 - Stage 2 ------ 183 187 -95 79 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -- 4.1 -- 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 -- 2.2 -- 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1522 -- 1532 -- 695 643 987 681 649 986 Stage 1 ------ 935 833 - 826 754 - Stage 2 ------ 823 749 - 917 833 - Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1522 -- 1532 -- 673 621 987 642 627 986 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ 673 621 - 642 627 - Stage 1 ------ 935 833 - 826 728 - Stage 2 ------ 790 724 - 887 833 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.7 8.9 10.5 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)960 1522 -- 1532 -- 667 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 --- 0.033 -- 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s)8.9 0 -- 7.4 0 - 10.5 HCM Lane LOS A A --A A -B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 0 -- 0.1 -- 0.1 Page 440 of 454 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington Full Build PM 16: Access A/218th St & 220th St W 01/09/2026 Vermillion Reserve - Farmington 12:00 am 12/22/2025 Full Build PM HCM 6th TWSC SPI Page 6 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 1 33 9 6 1 1 20 32 1 6 Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 1 33 9 6 1 1 20 32 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized -- None -- None -- None -- None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # -0 --0 --0 --0 - Grade, %-0 --0 --0 --0 - Peak Hour Factor 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 3 2 55 15 10 2 2 33 53 2 10 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 25 0 0 5 0 0 140 139 4 152 135 20 Stage 1 ------4 4 - 130 130 - Stage 2 ------ 136 135 -22 5 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 -- 4.1 -- 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 -- 2.2 -- 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 -- 1630 -- 835 756 1085 820 760 1064 Stage 1 ------ 1024 897 - 878 792 - Stage 2 ------ 872 789 - 1002 896 - Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1603 -- 1630 -- 804 730 1085 772 734 1064 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ 804 730 - 772 734 - Stage 1 ------ 1024 897 - 878 765 - Stage 2 ------ 833 762 - 969 896 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 5 8.6 9.9 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1045 1603 -- 1630 -- 805 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 --- 0.034 -- 0.081 HCM Control Delay (s)8.6 0 -- 7.3 0 - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A --A A -A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)0.1 0 -- 0.1 -- 0.3 Page 441 of 454 Turn Lane Analysis Page 442 of 454 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Vermillion Estates - Farmington Denmark Ave at Access C Full Build PM 12/22/2025 Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 50 301 36 OUTPUT Value 45 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Variable Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Right-Turn Volume, veh/h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Pa g e 4 4 3 o f 4 5 4 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Vermillion Estates - Farmington Denmark Ave at Access C FM PM 12/22/2025 Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 50 1% 204 337 OUTPUT Value 709 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.3 5.5 3.2 Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Variable Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Critical headway, s: Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Average time for making left-turn, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Pa g e 4 4 4 o f 4 5 4 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Vermillion Estates - Farmington Denmark Ave at Access D Full Build PM 12/22/2025 Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 50 266 36 OUTPUT Value 52 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Variable Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Right-Turn Volume, veh/h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Pa g e 4 4 5 o f 4 5 4 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Vermillion Estates - Farmington Denmark Ave at Access D FM PM 12/22/2025 Figure 2 - 5. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. 2-lane roadway (English) INPUT Value 50 2% 185 302 OUTPUT Value 600 CALIBRATION CONSTANTS Value 4.3 5.5 3.2 Advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Opposing volume (VO), veh/h: Variable Variable Variable 85th percentile speed, mph: Percent of left-turns in advancing volume (VA), %: Critical headway, s: Average time for left-turn vehicle to clear the advancing lane, s: Limiting advancing volume (VA), veh/h: Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay: Left-turn treatment NOT warranted. Average time for making left-turn, s: 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h Left-turn treatment warranted. Left-turn treatment not warranted. Pa g e 4 4 6 o f 4 5 4 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Vermillion Estates - Farmington Denmark Ave at 225th St Full Build PM 12/22/2025 Figure 2 - 6. Guideline for determining the need for a major-road right-turn bay at a two-way stop-controlled intersection. INPUT Value 50 174 80 OUTPUT Value 87 right-turn bay for a 2-lane roadway: Do NOT add right-turn bay. Roadway geometry: Variable Variable Guidance for determining the need for a major-road Major-road speed, mph: Major-road volume (one direction), veh/h: Right-turn volume, veh/h: Limiting right-turn volume, veh/h: 2-lane roadway 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Right-Turn Volume, veh/h Major-Road Volume (one direction), veh/h Add right - turn bay Pa g e 4 4 7 o f 4 5 4 Traffic Signal Warrants Page 448 of 454 ITE Code Land Use Trip Gen Denmark & 220th Daily Enter Exit DIST 1625 1625 27%13%2%33%17%17%13%2%33%27% enter exit Time Entering Exiting WBL WBT NBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR NBT NBR 12-1 AM 0.5 0.2 2 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 1 1-2 AM 0.2 0.1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 2-3 AM 0.3 0.1 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 3-4 AM 0.2 0.2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 4-5 AM 0.3 0.8 1 1 0 2 1 2 2 0 4 3 5-6 AM 0.5 2.0 2 1 0 3 1 6 4 1 11 9 6-7 AM 1.6 5.8 7 3 1 9 4 16 12 2 31 25 7-8 AM 3.1 10.0 14 7 1 17 9 28 21 4 54 44 8-9 AM 3.8 8.5 17 8 1 20 10 23 18 3 46 37 9-10 AM 3.3 5.8 14 7 1 18 9 16 12 2 31 25 10-11 AM 4.2 5.6 18 9 2 23 12 15 12 2 30 24 11-12 PM 5.4 5.1 24 12 2 29 15 14 11 2 27 22 12-1 PM 5.7 5.7 25 12 2 31 16 16 12 2 31 25 1-2 PM 6.1 6.0 27 13 2 33 17 17 13 2 32 26 2-3 PM 7.1 6.1 31 15 3 38 20 17 13 2 33 27 3-4 PM 8.7 6.2 38 19 3 47 24 17 13 2 33 27 4-5 PM 10.5 7.4 46 23 4 56 29 20 16 3 40 32 5-6 PM 10.0 7.3 44 21 4 54 28 20 16 3 39 32 6-7 PM 8.5 5.9 37 18 3 46 23 16 13 2 32 26 7-8 PM 6.1 4.2 27 13 2 33 17 12 9 2 23 18 8-9 PM 6.1 3.1 27 13 2 33 17 9 7 1 17 14 9-10 PM 4.4 2.3 19 9 2 24 12 6 5 1 12 10 10-11 PM 2.1 1.0 9 5 1 11 6 3 2 0 5 4 11-12 AM 1.3 0.6 6 3 0 7 4 2 1 0 3 3 210 Single Family Housing % of 24-Hour Traffic Pa g e 4 4 9 o f 4 5 4 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Traffic Control Signal Warrants project 4/29/2026 Page 1 Prepared By PE no.26531 Count 10/8/24 Major Road Speed 50 Lanes 1 Minor Road Speed 30 Lanes 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 YES YES N/A no N/A N/A N/A no no Full Build 2030 Scenario Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Requirements: Major Street Minor Street 100%80%70%56%100%80%70%56% 1 1 500 400 350 280 150 120 105 84 2 or more 1 600 480 420 336 150 120 105 84 2 or more 2 or more 600 480 420 336 200 160 140 112 1 2 or more 500 400 350 280 200 160 140 112 Major Street Minor Street 100%80%70%56%100%80%70%56% 1 1 750 600 525 420 75 60 53 42 2 or more 1 900 720 630 504 75 60 53 42 2 or more 2 or more 900 720 630 504 100 80 70 56 1 2 or more 750 600 525 420 100 80 70 56 100% 80% 70% 56% Condition A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Condition B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Number of lanes for traffic on each approach Vehicles per hour on major street (total of both approaches) Vehicles per hour on higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction) Scott P. Israelson Denmark Ave 220th Either Condition A (Minimum Vehicular Volume) or Condition B (Interruption of Continuous Traffic) is satisfied to 100% of the stated volumes for each of any 8 hours of an average day, OR Both Condition A and B are satisfied to 80% of the stated volumes for each of any 8 hours of an average day Warrants Satisfied Used for combination of Conditions A and B and where 70% of minimum hourly volume is used Number of lanes for traffic on each approach Vehicles per hour on major street (total of both approaches) Vehicles per hour on higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction) Used when the major-street speed exceeds 40 mph or in an isolated community with a population of less than 10,000 Used for combination of Conditions A and B Basic minimum hourly volume Signal Warranted?YES Page 450 of 454 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Traffic Control Signal Warrants project 4/29/2026 Page 2 00:00 22 7 01:00 10 1 02:00 14 5 03:00 12 5 04:00 38 20 05:00 148 60 06:00 326 156 07:00 583 227 YES YES YES 08:00 531 186 YES YES YES 09:00 391 135 YES YES 10:00 360 127 YES 11:00 384 134 YES YES 12:00 434 158 YES YES 13:00 425 151 YES YES 14:00 594 188 YES YES YES 15:00 811 231 YES YES YES 16:00 773 273 YES YES YES 17:00 657 232 YES YES YES 18:00 518 165 YES YES 19:00 342 112 20:00 284 72 21:00 162 73 22:00 94 27 23:00 48 14 Condition A YES Condition B no Condition A+B YES Hour Major Street total highest minor Condition A Condition B Condition A+B Warrant 1 Met?YES Page 451 of 454 Traffic Impact Group, LLC Traffic Control Signal Warrants project 4/29/2026 Page 3 Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Requirements Plot four highest hour volumes on the figures below, if four points lie above the curve then the warrant is satisfied Warrant 2 Met?YES 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Minor Street Volume (High Approach Only) Major Street Volume (Both Approaches) Warrant Threshold Intersection Volumes Page 452 of 454 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator From: Lynn Gorski, City Administrator Department: Administration Subject: Planning Commission Appointment Meeting: Regular Council - May 18 2026 INTRODUCTION: Due to the appointment of Phil Windschitl to the Farmington City Council, a vacancy now exists on the Planning Commission. This item is to consider the appointment of an individual to fill the open Planning Commission seat. DISCUSSION: The Planning Commission vacancy will be filled as an unexpired term, with the appointment running through January 2028. City Council discussed the Planning Commission vacancy during the May 4, 2026 Work Session. City ordinance indicates that Planning Commission members are appointed by City Council; however, the ordinance does not provide additional direction regarding the specific process for filling a vacancy. During the discussion, City Council considered the following options to fill the open seat: 1. Select from the existing applicant pool from the most recent Planning Commission recruitment process (November/December 2025) 2. Initiate a new application process 3. Direct appointment Following discussion, City Council directed staff to move forward with Option 1, selecting from the existing applicant pool. Based on that pool of applicants, City Council selected Nate Lehmeyer for appointment to the Planning Commission. Page 453 of 454 BUDGET IMPACT: Planning Commission seat is included in the 2026 budget. ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the appointment of Nate Lehmeyer to the Planning Commission to fill the vacant seat through January 2028. Page 454 of 454