The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05.06.02 Council Packet r City of Fannington 325 Oak Street Fannington, MN 55024 A Proud Past - A Promising Future Committed to Providing High Quality, Timely and Responsive Service to All Of Our Customers AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 6, 2002 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL ~ 4. APPROVEAGENDA ~ 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS a) Introduction of New Employee - Police b) Proclaim Poppy Day - May 17, 2002 c) Proclaim Heritage Preservation Week - May 12-18, 2002 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Openfor Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (4/15/02 Regular) (4/13/02 Special) b) Appointment Recommendation - Finance C) Appointment Recommendation - Parks and Recreation d) Approve Private Development Street Sweeping Contract - Engineering e) Approve Easement Acquisition - Middle Creek Trunk Utility Extension/195th Street West Project - Engineering f) Approve MPCA Grant Agreement - Engineering g) Approve Assessment Agreements - Akin Sewer Project - Engineering h) Approve Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement - Police i) Approve Easement Agreement - Benedict Property - Administration j) Capital Outlay - Parks & Recreation k) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS I). AWARD OF CONTRACT Action Taken Introduced Proclaimed Proclaimed Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Information Received Approved 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Quarterly Building Report - Community Development Information Received b) Ordinance Amendment - Zoning Map - Property South of Trinity Hospital and Trinity Terrace North of Oak Street - Community Development Approved c) Consider Resolution.. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Map- Low Density to Medium Density - Pine Street - Community Development d) Consider Resolution - 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Community Development e) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Title 10-5: Parks and Open Space- Community Development f) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 10-5-1: Zoning Map - Community Development g) Consider Resolution - Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development h) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 10-5-5(C): A-I Agriculture Uses - Interim Use Permit - Community Development i) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Title 4-6: Demolition.. Community Development j) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 10-6-4(L): Off-Street Parking- Recreational Vehicles - Community Development k) Consider Resolution - Metropolitan Council Opportunity Grant - Community Development 1) Schedule Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop - Community Development m)Annual League of Minnesota Cities Conference - Administration n) Schedule Budget Workshop - Administration 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN R38-02 R39-02 Ord 002-472 Ord 002-473 R40-02 Ord002..474 Ord 002..475 Ord 002-476 R41..02 May 28, 2002 Information Received June 5, 2002 · J City of Fannington 325 Oak Street Fannington, MN 55024 A Proud Past - A Promising Future Committed to Providing High Quality, Timely and Responsive Service to All Of Our Customers AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 6, 2002 7:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVEAGENDA 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS/COMMENDATIONS a) Introduction of New Employee - Police b) Proclaim Poppy Day - May 17, 2002 c) Proclaim Heritage Preservation Week - May 12-18,2002 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS (Openfor Audience Comments) 7. CONSENT AGENDA a) Approve Council Minutes (4/15/02 Regular) (4/13/02 Special) b) Appointment Recommendation - Finance c) Appointment Recommendation - Parks and Recreation d) Approve Private Development Street Sweeping Contract - Engineering e) Approve Easement Acquisition - Middle Creek Trunk Utility Extension/195th Street West Project - Engineering f) Approve MPCA Grant Agreement - Engineering g) Approve Assessment Agreements - Akin Sewer Project.. Engineering h) Approve Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement - Police i) Approve Easement Agreement - Benedict Property - Administration j) Capital Outlay - Parks & Recreation k) Approve Bills 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT Action Ta~n Pages 594-595 Page 596 Pages 597-598 Pages 599-603 Page 604 Page 605 Pages 606-613 Page 614 Pages 615-621 Pages 622-642 Page 643 Page 644 Page 645 Pages 647 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Quarterly Building Report - Community Development Pages 648-651 b) Ordinance Amendment - Zoning Map - Property South of Trinity Hospital and Trinity Terrace North of Oak Street - Community Development Pages 652-656 c) Consider Resolution - Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Map- Low Density to Medium Density - Pine Street - Community Development d) Consider Resolution - 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendments.. Community Development e) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Title 10-5: Parks and Open Space- Community Development f) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 10-5-1: Zoning Map - Community Development g) Consider Resolution - Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat - Community Development h) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 10-5-5(C): A-I Agriculture Uses- Interim Use Permit - Community Development i) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Title 4-6: Demolition - Community Development j) Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 10-6-4(L): Off-Street Parking- Recreational Vehicles - Community Development k) Consider Resolution - Metropolitan Council Opportunity Grant - Community Development 1) Schedule Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop - Community Development m)Annual League of Minnesota Cities Conference - Administration n) Schedule Budget Workshop - Administration 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE 14. ADJOURN Pages 657-697 Pages 698-723 Pages 724-72.7 Pages 728-786 Pages 787-798 Pages 799-816 Pages 817-826 Pages 827-851 Pages 852..857 Page 858 Pages 859-869 Page 870 5'c:L City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Membe~r ( and City Administrator '\ . FROM: Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police SUBJECT: Hiring Recommendation DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION In April council authorized the hiring of Officer Gary Rutherford as the newest member of the Farmington Police Department. DISCUSSION Mr. Gary Rutherford started working for the City of Farmington as a Police Officer on April 30, 2002. His most recent work experience was as a Police Officer for the City of North field, MN where he was employed since August 1996. He graduated from Inver Hills Community College with an Associates Degree in Law Enforcement. As a member of the Northfield Police Department Officer Rutherford proved himself to be an exemplary employee. He is a Certified Firearms Instructor and has served as a member of the Dakota County MAAG team since 1999, In addition Officer Rutherford served as a Certified Field Training Officer for the Northfield Police Department. ACTION REQUESTED Officer Rutherford will take his Oath of Office and be introduced to the City Council. c71~ Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police ~t' FARMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT I, Gary Rutherford, do solemnly swear, That I will support and defend the Constitution of The United States of America and the State of Minnesota against all enemies, foreign and domestic. That I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same. That I take this obligation freely, without mental reservation or purpose of evasion. That I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter. I do further swear, That while a member of the Farmington Police Department, I will not advocate, nor become a member of any political party that advocates the overthrow of the United States of America or the State of Minnesota by force or violence, so help me God. Officer Signature Witness Gary Rutherford Ed Shukle, City Administrator Date May 6, 2002 May 6, 2002 . Chief of Police Daniel M, Siebenaler $7$ POppy DAY PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The poppy, as a memorial flower for the American war dead, is a tradition which began in the years following the First World War, and WHEREAS: Veterans returning to their homes in this country after World War I remembered the wild poppies which lined the devastated battlefields of France and Flanders Field; and WHEREAS: The poppy is a symbol of hope for all veterans who served this great country through military service; and WHEREAS: The American Legion Auxiliary adapted the poppy as its memorial flower to pay tribute to the war dead and aid the living veteran and their family; and THEREFORE: I, Gerald Ristow, Mayor of the City of Farmington, Minnesota do hereby proclaim the 17th of May 2002 as POppy DAY and urge all citizens to pay tribute to those who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the name of freedom by wearing the Memorial Poppy on this day. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused to be affixed the official seal of Farmington, Minnesota the 1 st day of May 2002. Mayor 5b .s9~ 5'e-, City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrato~ ~ FROM: Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager SUBJECT: Proclaim May 12-18,2002 Historic Preservation Week DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION "Preserving the Spirit of Place" is the theme for Preservation Week 2002. DISCUSSION Historic Preservation is an effective tool for managing growth, revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community character while enhancing livability. It also provides an excellent opportunity for people to learn more about ways to preserve our heritage for future generations. National Preservation week 2002 is being co-sponsored by the Farmington Heritage Preservation Commission. ACTION REOUESTED Adopt the attached Proclamation designating the week of May 12-18,2002, as Historic Preservation Week. Respectfully submitted, ~a-~ Karen Finstuen Administrative Services Manager f 59} HISTORIC PRESERVATION WEEK PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth, revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community character while enhancing livability; and WHEREAS, historic preservation is relevant for Farmington residents of all ages, all walks of life, and all ethnic backgrounds; and WHEREAS, it is important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tangible aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as a community;and WHEREAS, "Preserving the Spirit of Place" is the theme for Historic Preservation Week 2002, cosponsored by the Farmington Heritage Preservation Commission and the National Trust for Historic Preservation NOW, THEREFORE, we, the City Council of the City of Farmington, do proclaim May 12-18,2002, as Historic Preservation Week, and call upon the people of Farmington to join their fellow citizens across the United States in recognizing and participating in this special observance. 57'~ /a- COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR April 15, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Ristow led the audience and Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Audience: Ristow, Cordes, Soderberg, Strachan, Verch None Andrea Poehler, Acting City Attorney; Ed Shukle, City Administrator; Robin Roland, Finance Director; Jim Bell, Parks and Recreation Director; Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer; Karen Finstuen, Administrative Services Manager; Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Manager; Cynthia Muller, Executive Assistant Earl Teporten, Steve Frandrup, James Frost, Michelle Leonard, Mike Cox, Arvilla Neff, Rosemary Swedin 4. APPRO VE A GENDA MOTION by Verch, second by Strachan to approve the Agenda. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS a) Acknowledge Retirement - Arvilla NetT Mayor Ristow presented Arvilla Neff with a plaque recognizing her years of service. She served as Utility Billing Clerk from 1984-2002. b) Dakota County Fair - Jim Frost Mr. Jim Frost, Dakota County Fair Board Manager, gave an overview of his background and the Dakota County Agricultural Society. c) Proclaim Volunteer Recognition Week - April 22-26, 2002 MOTION by Cordes, second by Soderberg proclaiming April 22-26, 2002 as Volunteer Recognition Week. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. d) Proclaim Arbor Month MOTION by Soderberg, second by Verch proclaiming Mayas Arbor month and April 26, 2002 as Arbor Day. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. e) Proclaim Loyalty Day - May 1,2002 MOTION by Soderberg, second by Cordes proclaiming May 1,2002 as Loyalty Day. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS 5'79 Council Minutes (Regular) April 15, 2002 Page 2 7. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a) Approved Council Minutes (4/1/02 Regular) b) Adopted RESOLUTION R33-02 Revising Precinct Lines - Administration c) Adopted RESOLUTION R34-02 Approving Gambling Premise Permit - VFW- Administration d) Approved Change Order.. City Facilities Project - Engineering e) Approved Change Order.. Middle Creek Trunk Utility Extension Project .. Engineering f) Approved Appointment Recommendation.. Police.. Administration g) Approved Appointment Recommendation - Public Works - Administration h) Adopted RESOLUTION R35-02 Acknowledging Retirement - Finance- Administration i) Adopted RESOLUTION R36-02 Approving MSA Mileage Designation - Engineering j) Approved Bills APIF, MOTION CARRIED. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) Adopt Resolution - 209th Street Project - Engineering The proposed improvements include bituminous paving, curb and gutter, storm sewer and water main. The allocation of the costs for the improvements proposed for 209th Street was addressed in the development contracts for the Tamarack Ridge Development. The developer is responsible for the construction of the street and the developer will be reimbursed for the costs apportioned to the residents along the south side of the street. The residents along the south side of 209th Street were annexed into the City in January of2001. The total estimated project cost for the 209th Street improvements is $311,000. The proposed cost allocations and assessments are as follows: Costs allocated to developer $159,800 Costs allocated to the south side of 209th Street $151,200 Assessment per unit for Street, Storm Sewer and $ 9,970 Water Main Deferred Assessments to City Properties (2 units) $ 19,940 Future Assessments to Empire Township properties $ 51,550 The appraisal for the project has been completed and indicates that the sustainable benefit to the subject properties for the proposed improvements is $11,000 per unit. Councilmember Soderberg asked about the status of Empire continuing the blacktop to CR 66. City Engineer Mann replied the township has indicated they do not have the budget for it at this time. MOTION by Verch, second by Strachan to close the Public Hearing. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION by Verch, second by Cordes adopting RESOLUTION R37-02 ordering the project, approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. ~co Council Minutes (Regular) April 15, 2002 Page 3 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT 10. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS a) Customer Service Response Report - Administration The Customer Service Response Report was presented for October-December 2001. Results of the survey were 97% received a prompt response to their requests, 96% were personally satisfied, and 100% felt staff was courteous and helpful. b) Approve Compensation Study Consultant Contract - Administration The City sent out Request for Proposals for a compensation study and received seven responses. Upon completion of the interviews and reference checks, the City chose Fox Lawson to be the consultants for the Compensation Study. The cost of this study is $26,500. MOTION by Cordes, second by Verch approving the Compensation Study Consultant contract. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. c) Approve City Hall Task Force Scope of Work -Administration Staff is in the process of assembling a new task force to study the immediate, short-term and long-term needs of the city hall facility. Wold Architects has proposed to assist in this city hall effort. The proposed scope of work will cost $2,000. Mr. Mike Cox, Wold Architects, stated the options for the city hall facility are to remodel the existing building or build a new building. Items to be considered include growth, site options, financing, long and short-term needs. The process should take approximately 6 months. Representatives from the Council, HRA, Planning Commission, and interested citizens will make up the task force. The task force will be limited to 12 members. MOTION by Soderberg, second by Verch approving the proposed scope of work for the city hall task force project and approve the engagement of Wold to assist the city hall task force during this first phase of the project. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. d) Charter Communications Information - Administration Charter Communications will be reformatting the MTV Networks during May. e) March 2002 Financial Report - Finance March revenues and expenditures for the 1 st quarter of 2002 were presented to Council. Revenues are running 10% of total year revenue budget. The City is on target with last year. The general fund is at 21 % of annual budget spent vs. a possible 25%. t) Trunk Hwy 3 Access Management Study Workshop - Engineering MnDOT is proposing to initiate an Access Management Study for Hwy 3. A workshop is scheduled for April 16, 2002. g) Castle Rock Township and Empire Township Communication - Engineering Staff contacted Empire Township regarding the paving of Cambodia Avenue. The township was not able to include that project in their budget for this year. The joint workshop with Council and Castle Rock Township regarding the Ash Street project will be held sometime in May. Gol Council Minutes (Regular) April 15, 2002 Page 4 11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Council member Strachan: Councilmember Strachan spoke with Earl Teporten of the Heritage Preservation Commission regarding St. Michael's Church. Mr. Teporten wanted to make sure everyone is on the same page as far as the decision by Council to not force heritage landmark designation on a property without the owner's consent. Mr. Teporten felt the City Attorney gave the impression it is part of the City Code or a law. Councilmember Strachan stated it is not part of the code but a policy decision made by Council, which Councilmember Strachan agrees with. Councilmember Soderberg: He spoke with City Administrator Shukle regarding dispute resolution and mediation. Administrator Shukle will check with state agencies to see what is available. Councilmember Soderberg received an inquiry from a resident requesting information on disputes between residents. Regarding heritage landmark designation, Council's policy is to not force designation on a property without the owner's consent. The work done by the Heritage Preservation Commission was on the mark and the property does fit the criteria. He agrees with the HPC's assessment, however, it is Council's policy not to force the designation and that is why Council did not take any action. Councilmember Cordes: The Chamber of Commerce will hold a Volunteer Recognition Dinner on April 24. 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Cordes, second by Strachan to adjourn at 7:57 p.m. APIF, MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ~ yY}~d Cynthia Muller Executive Assistant CoCA;? MINUTES CITY COUNCIL 2002 Leadership/Strategic Planning Retreat APRIL 13, 2002 1. The retreat was called to order by Mayor Ristow at 8:00 a.m. Present: Mayor Ristow, Councilmembers Cordes and Soderberg, City Administrator Shukle, Management Team members Bell, Carroll, Finstuen, Kuchera, Mann, Muller, Roland, Siebenaler, Wendlandt and facilitator Don Salverda. Absent: Councilmembers Strachan and Verch 2. The group identified issues and opportunities that need to be addressed and keys for working as a team. 3. The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, I~)cw--g:~~ Karen Finstuen Administrative Services Manager City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 76 TO: Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator ~\. FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Manager SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation - Finance Department DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a full-time Utility Billing Clerk has been completed. DISCUSSION The City recruited for this position externally. After a thorough review by the Finance Department and the Human Resources Office, an offer of employment has been made to Ms. Brandi Larson, subject to ratification by the City Council. Ms. Larson is currently employed with Arthur Anderson and handles the billing process for their clients. She has customer service experience and meets the qualifications for the position. BUDGET IMPACT Funding for this position is authorized in the 2002 budget. RECOMMENDATION Approve the appointment of Ms. Brandi Larson as Utility Billing Clerk in the Department of Finance, effective on or about May 7, 2002. Respectfully submitted, ,,," ' /,;f ~"tJfCl-~/?I;c#l:i(/~t- I Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Manager (poi City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7c-> TO: 1r. Mayor, Councilmembers and City Administrator FROM: Brenda Wendlandt, Human Resources Manager SUBJECT: Appointment Recommendation - Parks and Recreation Department DATE: May 6, 2002 , INTRODUCTION The recruitment and selection process for the appointment of a full-time Solid Waste Operator has been completed. DISCUSSION The City recruited for this position externally. After a thorough review by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Human Resources Office, an offer of employment has been made to Mr. Matthew Waltman, subject to ratification by the City Council. Mr. Waltman has been employed in a temporary capacity with the City in the Solid Waste Division performing a variety of functions. He has previous solid waste experience and exceeds the minimum qualifications for the position. BUDGET IMPACT Funding for this position is authorized in the 2002 budget. RECOMMENDATION Approve the appointment of Mr. Matthew Waltman as Solid Waste Operator in the Department of Parks and Recreation effective on or about May 7, 2002. Respectfully submitted, .Ju/<-i3~kr!drj1dt- / Brenda Wendlandt, SPHR Human Resources Manager /~,I ~.,...I..."" City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminJO:on.mn.us ld TO: M C '1 b C. Ad . . ~ C ayor, ounCl mem ers, Ity mmlstrator Tim Gross, Assistant City Engineer <-p- FROM: SUBJECT: Private Development Street Sweeping Contract DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION Staff has solicited quotes for street cleaning services in the private developments for 2002. Requests for proposals for street cleaning services was advertised in the Farmington Independent for two weeks. In addition, proposal packets were sent to contractors that had submitted proposals for street cleaning services in the past. Three quotes were received for street cleaning services. DISCUSSION It is stipulated in all private development contracts that the Developer is responsible to keep the streets clear of soil and debris. It has proven to be very difficult to enforce this issue, and the amount of soil and debris in the streets is significant at times. The City has the right under the Development Contract to perform work and bill the costs to the Developer when there is a default of the contract. Failing to keep the streets clean is considered a default of the Development Contract, and allows the City to take proper remedial action. The streets need to be kept clean for two main reasons. First, if the streets are not kept clean, soil and debris is washed into the storm sewer system and holding ponds during rainfall events. If the debris gets into a system downstream of the development, taxpayer dollars will need to be expended to clean the system and ponds. Secondly, staff has received numerous complaints from residents regarding the difficulties navigating streets coated in dirt and mud. The procedure for street cleaning services will be the same as last year. The developments will be inspected on Tuesdays and Thursdays after 12:00 p.m. The City's contractor will clean those streets that are not clean by 12:00 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays, on the following day (Wednesday and Friday). The cost for street cleaning services including an administrative fee will be billed back to the Developer. As in the past, it will be entirely up to the Developer as to whether or not the City assists himlher with street cleaning. If all of the streets within a development are clean at 12:00 p.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays, the City's contractor will not be ordered to clean the streets in that development and the Developer will not be billed for street cleaning at that time. The only exception to this is if staff G,~ is made aware of a situation that needs to be addressed immediately and the Developer cannot respond as necessary. BUDGET IMPACT The low quote for street cleaning was received from Hoffbeck Trucking (see attached). The cost to the Developer (plus an administrative fee) will be $65/hour for skid loader work and $75/hour for sweeper work. In 2001, the City of Farmington utilized approximately 288 hours of sweeper time and 8.25 hours of skid loader time. There would be no budget impact to the City. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the award of contract for street cleaning services to Hoffbeck Trucking by motion. Respectfully submitted, ~ Tim Gross, P .E. Assistant City Engineer cc: file &,0/ 2002 STREET SWEEPING BIDS RECEIVED BY 2:00 PM March 28, 2001 CONTRACTOR NAMES FOSS SWEEPtNG & PLOWING. INC. 1 SWEEPER 90,00 $ 80,00 2 SKID LOADER 65.00 $ 57.00 (;:,O~ STREET CLEANING CONTRACT AGREEMENT dated this day of , 2002, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and HOFFBECK TRUCKING, INC., a Minnesota corporation ("Contractor"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL UNDERTAKINGS HEREIN, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Scope of Work. A. The City hereby engages Contractor to provide street cleaning services within private developments in the City. Contractor shall clean only those streets identified by the City Engineer during the 24-hour period prior to the scheduled cleaning date. B. Contractor will provide street cleaning services on those streets identified by the City Engineer every Wednesday and Friday, at a minimum. C. In performing the work under this Agreement, Contractor shall use only those hydrants approved by the City for Contractor's use. The City shall provide Contractor with a water meter which Contractor shall use when obtaining water from City hydrants. Contractor shall not be charged for City water used in performing work under this Agreement. D. The City's Inspector shall verify that the work is completed to the satisfaction of the City. Contractor's failure to clean streets to the City's satisfaction and in a timely manner shall be cause for termination of this Agreement by the City without notice. Section 2. Notification. A. Lists of streets within the City that require cleaning which will be faxed by the City to the Contractor prior to the scheduled day for cleaning. No verbal street cleaning list will be supplied. If there are no streets that require cleaning on a scheduled day, the City inspector will forward a fax indicating that there are no streets to be cleaned that day. If the scheduled street cleaning day falls on a holiday or there is severe weather, as determined by the City, the City shall designate an alternate day for performance of Contractor's services. Section 3. Equipment. A. Contractor shall perform the work required under this Agreement using the following fully operational equipment: 1) Street sweeper: must be equipped with right and left gutter brooms with water discharge; and 2) A skid loader. ~CJr Each sweeper will be equipped with an anti-siphon device. Plastic brushes are acceptable. B. When requested by the City, Contractor shall furnish a complete statement of equipment condition and previous length of service on all equipment to be used in the performance of the work under this Agreement. The City's Public Works Director or designee may reject any equipment used to perform the work covered under this Agreement. Section 4. Contract Term. A. Contractor shall commence services April 16, 2002 through March 31, 2003. This Agreement may be terminated earlier by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' notice to the other party, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. Section 5. Payment. A. The City shall pay Contractor a unit price per hour as follows: $75.00/hour for use of pickup broom with water discharge $65.00/hour for use of the skid loader B. The unit price per hour includes only time spent actually operating equipment and does not include downtime. The unit prices per hour shall cover all of the City's costs associated with the street cleaning. Contractor shall be responsible for all costs it incurs in the transportation and disposal of materials off-site. C. Application for payment shall be made monthly. Contractor shall invoice each development in the City separately. Upon approval of the invoice by the City, the City will remit the approved invoice amount directly to Contractor. Section 6. Documentation. A. Contractor shall be responsible for keeping and maintaining the following records on a daily basis. 1) The total number of cleaning hours per development for each piece of equipment identified in Section 2. 2) The number of dumps and estimated yards of debris per development. B. These records shall be submitted weekly to the City's Public Works Director or designee showing the dates, times and street locations where sweeping was done in each development. Section 7. Emen!:ency Response. During the contract term it may be necessary to have contract work done on an emergency basis. Upon the City's request for additional work, Contractor shall respond to the City's request upon 24 hours verbal or written notice. If the 2 0/0 City's Public Works Director or designee determines it necessary, the City may hire another entity other than Contractor for completion of the requested work. Section 8. Independent Contractor. The City hereby retains Contractor as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Contractor is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Contractor shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary for Contractor's performance under this Agreement. The City and Contractor agree that Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Contractor shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Contractor's own FICA payments, worker's compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self- employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. Section 9. Extra Service. No claim will be honored for compensation for extra services or work beyond the scope of this Agreement without the written approval of the City. Section 10. Insurance. Contractor shall furnish the City certificates of insurance from insurers duly licensed with the State of Minnesota covering public liability insurance, including general liability, automobile liability and bodily injury liability in an amount of at least $500,000 for injury or death of anyone person in anyone occurrence; and bodily injury liability in an amount of at least $1,000,000 for injuries or death arising out of anyone occurrence. Property damage liability shall be furnished in the amount of at least $200,000. Contractor shall comply with all applicable insurance requirements of the Worker's Compensation Act. Contractor shall provide proof of worker's compensation coverage. The City shall be named an additional insured on the general liability policy. Section 11. Unsafe Conditions Reportine:. Contractor shall promptly inform the City by telephone and in writing of any unsafe conditions on City streets or property discovered during the course of Contractor's duties, whether or not Contractor is able to remedy the unsafe condition. Section 12. Indemnification. Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of negligence in the execution or performance of the work or services provided for herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising hereunder. 3 (p/I Section 13. Covenant A1!ainst Contin1!ent Fees. Contractor warrants that it has not employed any person to solicit or secure this Agreement for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee. Section 14. Governin1! Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 15. Notices. Pursuant to this Agreement, notices shall be hand-delivered or mailed as follows: AS TO CITY: City Administrator City of Farmington 325 Oak Street Farmington, MN 55024 AS TO CONTRACTOR: Hoffbeck Trucking 9745 215th Street W. Lakeville, MN 55044 Section 16. Miscellaneous. A. Contractor may not assign or subcontract any of the services to be performed hereunder without the written consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. B. This Agreement shall become effective only upon its execution by both the City and Contractor. This Agreement shall not be modified, amended, rescinded, waived or terminated without the approval in writing of the City. 4 c;.10< IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. Dated: , 2002. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald Ristow, Mayor And Edward Shukle, City Administrator CONTRACTOR: Dated: ,2002. HOFFBECK TRUCKING, INC. ~, 5 (p)3 7e City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminlrton.mn.us TO: M C '1 b C' Ad . . 1.5. ayor, ounCI mem ers, lty mlmstrator FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Easement Acquistion - Middle Creek Trunk Utility Extension/195th Street West Projects DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION Staffhas completed negotiations with two of the property owners for the right-of-way acquisition for the Middle Creek Trunk Utility Extension and the 195th Street West project. DISCUSSION Easements and right-of-way for the two projects need to be acquired from three property owners. Easements and right-of-way are needed from the property north of 195th Street (Donnelly property), right-of-way is needed from the two properties south of 195th Street on either side of the school property (Hallamek and Ward properties) and an easement is needed from the property adjacent to Charleswood at 200th Street (Donnelly property). BUDGET IMPACT The total amount negotiated for the right-of-way and easement acquisition for the Donnelly and Hallamek properties is $88,500.00. The City Attorney has indicated that the individual amounts to be paid to each property owner are reasonable and recommends settlement for the indicated amount. The individual property settlement information is available for review at Council's request. ACTION REQUESTED Approve by motion the acquisition of the easements and right-of-way for the Middle Creek Trunk Utility Extension and 195th Street West projects. Respectfully Submitted, ~m~ Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file ~/'1 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminJrton.mn.us 7-f TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator~l FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: MPCA Grant Agreement DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has forwarded a grant contract for funding of water connections to residences with contaminated wells along 209th Street. DISCUSSION As Council is aware, Dakota County and the MPCA have performed groundwater sampling over the past several years and have determined that there are several residences in the Farmington area that potentially could have contaminated wells. Some of the properties along the south side of 209th Street annexed into the City recently for the purposes of connecting to the City water system because of the contamination situation. The MPCA will fund the connection of homes with contaminated wells to the City's water system. The grant contract attached outlines the terms of the grant agreement. All the properties along 209th Street will be tested for well contamination and those properties that have a contaminated well will be reimbursed for the costs to hook up to City water. BUDGET IMPACT None. ACTION REOUESTED Approve the attached MPCA grant contract for the funding of water connections to properties with contaminated wells. Respectfully Submitted, ~h1~ Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file (elf) STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT his grant contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) nd The City of Farmington, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (Grantee). Recitals I. The State has issued a declaration of emergency under Minn. Stat. S 115B.17, subd. 1 with regard to the release of tetrachloroethylene into the environment, including ground water used as a drinking water supply, in the City of Farmington. 2. The Grantee is preparing to expand the City of Farmington' s Municipal Water Supply System, including emergency action to respond to the release of tetrachloroethylene by providing safe drinking water to residents whose private drinking water wells have been impacted by tetrachloroethylene contamination. The grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract to the satisfaction of the State. 3. The State is authorized to reimburse the Grantee for the reasonable and necessary costs of taking emergency action to address a release of hazardous substances into the environment under Minn. Stat. S 115B.20, subd. 2, clause (11). Grant Contract 1 Term of Grant Contract 1.1 Effective date: May 17, 2002, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later. The Grantee must not begin work under this grant contract until this contract is fully executed and the Grantee has been notified by the State's Authorized Representative to begin the work. 1.2 Expiration date: !tme 30, 2003, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract: 8. Liability; 9. State Audits; 10. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 12. Publicity and . Endorsement; 13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 15 Data Disclosure. 2 Grantee's Duties The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will perform the duties specified in Exhibit A which is attached and incorporated into this grant contract. ' 3 Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract. In the performance of this grant contract, time is of the essence. 4 Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. The State will pay for all services performed by the Grantee under this grant contract as follows: (1) Compensation. The MPCA will pay the capital cost of connecting residences with detectable levels of tetrachloroethylene in private drinking water wells to the municipal water system in accordance with Exhibit A. The Grantee will be paid a maximum lump sum of $8,000 for each service connection authorized by the MPCA Total Obligation. The total obligation of the State for all compensation and reimbursements to the Grantee under this grant contract shall not exceed $88,000. Grant (Rev, 12/00) &/t 4.2. Payment (1) Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted in a timely manner and according to the following schedule: Quarterly. The state will pay invoices within 30 days of receipt and approval of the invoice. The invoices should be submitted to: Lori Wursher (project manager: Hans Neve) MPCA Fiscal Services, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155. 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant contract must be performed to the State's satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State's Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative is Doug Wetzstein, Supervisor, Superfund Unit 1, MPCA, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55155, or his successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee's performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract. rfthe services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Grantee's Authorized Representative is Lee Mann P.E., Director of Public Works City Engineer, City of Farmington, 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota, 55024 . Either party may change its authorized representative my giving written notice of the change to the other party. 7 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant contract Complete 7.1 Assignment. The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant contract without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this grant contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant contract, or their successors in office. 7.3 Waiver. lfthe State fails to enforce any provision of this grant contract, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 7.4 Grant Contract Complete. This grant contract contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 8 Liability The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant contract by the Grantee or the Grantee's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant contract. Grant (Rev, 12/00) 2 ~/7 9 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. 9 16C.05, subd. 5, the Grantee's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this grant contract are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant contract. 10 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 10.1. Government Data Practices. The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. 9 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. 11 Workers' Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. 9 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers' compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee's employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part ofthese employees are in no way the State's obligation or responsibility. ...2 Publicity and Endorsement 12.1 Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. 12.2 Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services. 13 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 14 Termination 14.1 Termination by the State. The State may cancel this grant contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment for residential service connections satisfactorily completed up to the date of termination. 5 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. ~ 270.66, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in Grant (Rev, 12/00) 3 (PIC( the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn, Stat, ~~ 16A,I5 and 16C.05, 3. STATE AGENCY / PCA By: (with delegated authority) Signed: Title: Date: Date: CFMS Grant contract No. A- 2. GRANTEE/ City of Farmington The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances, By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: Distribution: Agency Grantee State's Photo Copy Grant (Rev, 12/00) 4 &,19 Exhibit A CITY'S DUTIES: DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, RESPONSIBILITY. Provide for the design, construction and ownership of the City's public water supply system expansion along 209th Street West, east of Chippendale Avenue in Farmington Minnesota, including service connections for residences. The water system must provide a reliable and safe supply of drinking water for residents in this area. The City is responsible for payment of all costs necessary to complete the public water supply system expansion not paid for by the MPCA under this agreement and shall enter into legally enforceable agreements to assure payment of all such costs. The City is also responsible to provide for the operation and maintenance of the public water supply system after completion of construction. B. LOCATION, PLANS, SCHEDULES. Prior to 1) the commencement of any construction of the City's public water supply system or 2) the entry into any legally enforceable contract for any construction under this Grant Contract, grantee shall provide to the MPCA information including final plans, specifications and a schedule which demonstrates that the public water supply system expansion will provide a reliable and safe supply of drinking water for residents along 209th Street West, east of Chippendale Avenue. A registered professional engineer shall prepare the plans, specifications and schedule. ACCOUNT ABILLITY. Keep and retain accurate records of the amount, date, and purpose of each payment by the City for the Project including and accounting of each payment made in whole or part using funds disbursed by the MPCA under this Agreement and the amount of the payment attributable to the disbursement. At the request of the MPCA, provide a current accounting of all expenditures related to the Proj ect. D. RETh1BURSEMENT TO MPCA. Return to the MPCA any funds disbursed to the City under this Agreement that the City did not use to pay for the purposes for which it was disbursed. E. NONCOMPLETION. If the City does not complete construction and commence operation of the Project by June 30,2003, the City shall return to the MPCA all funds paid to the City under this Agreement. , F. . OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY. The City shall own all property and interests in property, whether real or personal, acquired by the City for the Project. Within two years after acquisition for the Project of all real or personal property, the City shall identify all property not needed for the Project and dispose of the property in accordance with applicable law. The City shall divide the proceeds of such surplus property with MPCA pro rata based on the contribution of the City and MPCA to the total cost of the Project. Grant (Rev, 12/00) 5 (p~o G. REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS AWARDED BY THE CITY. 1. Provisions Required in Constmction Contracts. Every contract entered into by the City for the constmction of the Project shall provide for compliance with the following requirements: a. The State prevailing wage law for laborers or mechanics employed on the Project in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. 177.41 to 177.43 (2000). b. The nondiscrimination requirements of Minn. Stat 181.59 (2000). c. The payment and performance bond requirements of Minnesota Law. 2. Requirements Applicable to Work under any contract. All work performed under any contract entered into by the City for the constmction of the Project shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and mles, and local ordinances, and shall be subject to, and in accordance with, all necessary federal, state, and local permits and approvals. Grant (Rev, 12/00) 6 & <X! City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farminJrton.mn.us 7s TO: Mayor, Councilmembers, City Administrator t;,,, ~" FROM: Lee M. Mann, P .E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Assessment Agreements - Akin Sewer Project DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION Attached for Council's review and consideration are the assessment agreements for the Akin Sewer project. DISCUSSION Four property owners adjacent to Vermillion Grove Second Addition, north of 198th Street have agreed to be assessed for the sanitary sewer costs associated with extending a sewer pipe line along their backyards. The costs of the sewer project will be allocated per the Development Contract for Vermillion Grove 2nd Addition. BUDGET IMPACT The total project cost for the sewer installation is estimated to be approximately $56,000. Of that cost, the Developer is responsible for $14,000, each of the four property owners is responsible for $7,000 each and $14,000 will be deferred until such time as two additional lots are created by subdivision. ACTION REQUESTED Approve the attached assessment agreements by motion. Respectfull y Submitted, ~Yn~ Lee M. Mann, P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: file &~~ ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (ParceI14-02400-031-52) THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this day of 2002, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with offices at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024, and THOMAS ALLAN HOYER, a single individual, whose address is 19687 Akin Road West, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 ("Owner"). Recitals: A. The Owner owns the real property located in Dakota County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"), also referred to as Tax Parce114-02400-031-52; and B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the provision of sanitary sewer service to the Subject Property. The connection of said sewer service benefits the Subject Property; and C. The actual costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subject Property ("Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The total Assessments are: $8,575. The foregoing amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of six and a half percent (6.5%) per annum. The Assessments shall not exceed the amounts set forth on Exhibit "B". 99485 1 cPc23 2. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The Owner, by signing this Agreement, acknowledges that all procedural and substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owner, its successor or assign to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owner further waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. ~ 429.081. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor By: Edward J. Shukle, City Administrator Thomas Allan Hoyer STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2002, by Gerald G. Ristow and Edward J. Shukle, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 99485 2 (p~ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2002, by Thomas Allan Hoyer, a single individual. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan,MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/cjh 99485 3 (b.:{S' EXHIBIT "A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY That part ofthe Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, the point of beginning being as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter 1530.54 feet South ofthe Northeast comer, thence North 54053' West 400 feet, thence North 35007' east 100 feet, thence North 54053' West 528 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence North 54053' West 180 feet, thence North 35007' East 273 feet to the centerline of State Aid Road 19 (now known as S.A.R. 31), thence Southeasterly along the said centerline to it intersection with a line drawn North 35007' East from the point of beginning, thence South 35007' West 242 feet to the point of beginning, AND ALSO, that part of said Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of the said Southwest Quarter of Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence North 54053' West, a distance of928 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continue North 54053' West, a distance of 180 feet; thence North 35007' East, a distance of 100 feet; thence South 54053' East, a distance of 180 feet; thence South 35007' West, a distance of 100 feet to the actual point of beginning. 99485 4 c, ;{~. EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT ASSESSMENTS Lateral Sewer Main $7,000 Metropolitan Council Sewer $1,200 Availability Charge City Sewer Availability $375 Charge Total $8,575 99485 5 ~Q?/ ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (Parcel 14-02400-041-52) THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this day of 2002, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with offices at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024, and ERWIN W. HAGEN and HELEN M. HAGEN, husband and wife, whose address is 19643 Akin Road West, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 ("Owners"). Recitals: A. The Owners own the real property located in Dakota County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"), also referred to as Tax Parcel 14-02400-041-52; and B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the provision of sanitary sewer service to the Subject Property. The connection of said sewer service benefits the Subject Property; and C. The actual costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subject Property ("Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The total Assessments are: $8,575. The foregoing amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of six and a half percent (6.5%) per annum. The Assessments shall not exceed the amounts set forth on Exhibit "B". 99484 1 c:'~<ir 2. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The Owners, by signing this Agreement, acknowledge that all procedural and substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owners, their successors or assigns to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owners further waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. ~ 429.081. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor By: Edward J. Shukle, City Administrator Erwin W. Hagen Helen M. Hagen STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2002, by Gerald G. Ristow and Edward J. Shukle, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 99484 2 (p~9 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2002, by Erwin W. Hagen and Helen M. Hagen, husband and wife. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP /cjh 99484 3 C;;30 EXHIBIT" A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota, the point of beginning of the tract herein described being located as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Southwest Quarter of Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence North 54053' West a distance of 400 feet; thence North 35007' East a distance of 100 feet; thence North 54053' West a distance of708 feet to the actual point of beginning ofthe tract to be herein described; thence North 54053' West a distance of 109.4 feet; thence North 14000' East a distance of360 feet, more or less, to the centerline of S.A.R. No. 19; thence in a Southeasterly direction along the centerline of S.A.R. No. 19 to its intersection with a line drawn North 35017' East from the point of beginning; thence South 35017' West, along the aforementioned line, a distance of273 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. AND That part ofthe Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of the said Southwest Quarter of Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence North 54053' West, a distance of 1108 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continue North 54053' West, a distance of70.8 feet; thence North 14000' East, a distance of 107.2 feet; thence South 54053 East, a distance of 109.4 feet; thence South 35007' West, a distance of 100 feet to the actual point of beginning. 99484 4 (;31 EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT ASSESSMENTS Lateral Sewer Main $7,000 Metropolitan Council Sewer $1,200 Availability Charge City Sewer Availability $375 Charge Total $8,575 99484 5 .u. ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (Parce114-02400-011-52) THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this day of 2002, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with offices at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024, and J. ALLAN CORRIGAN and JANICE H. CORRIGAN, husband and wife, whose address is 19715 Akin Road West, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 ("Owners"). Recitals: A. The Owners own the real property located in Dakota County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"), also referred to as Tax Parce114-02400-011-52; and B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the provision of sanitary sewer service to the Subject Property. The connection of said sewer service benefits the Subject Property; and C. The actual costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subject Property ("Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The total Assessments are: $8,575. The foregoing amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of six and a half percent (6.5%) per annum. The Assessments shall not exceed the amounts set forth on Exhibit "B". 99486 1 ~33 2. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The Owners, by signing this Agreement, acknowledge that all procedural and substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owners, their successor or assign to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owners further waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. S 429.081. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor By: Edward J. Shukle, City Administrator J. Allan Corrigan Janice H. Corrigan STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2002, by Gerald G. Ristow and Edward J. Shukle, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 99486 2 ~3</ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2002, by J. Allan Corrigan and Janice H. Corrigan, husband and wife. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP /cjh 99486 3 ~35 EXHIBIT" A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY That part ofthe Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of the said Southwest Quarter of Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence North 54053' West, a distance of 528 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continue North 54053' West a distance of 200 feet; thence North 35007' East, a distance of 100 feet; thence South 54053' East, a distance of200 feet; thence South 35007' West, a distance of 100 feet to the actual point of beginning. AND That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota, the point of beginning of tract to be herein described being located as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence North 54053' West a distance of 400 feet; thence North 35007' East a distance of 100 feet; thence North 54053' West a distance of 128 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be herein described; thence North 54053' West a distance of 400 feet; thence North 35007' East a distance of 242 feet, more or less, to the centerline ofS.A.R. No. 31 (formerly S.A.R. No. 19); thence in a Southeasterly direction along the centerline of said S.A.R. No. 31 to its intersection with a line drawn North 35007' East from the actual point of beginning; thence South 35007' West along the aforementioned line a distance of 178 feet, more or less, to the point of actual beginning; EXCEPTING therefrom the following described tract, to-wit: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof; thence North 54053' West a distance of 400 feet; thence North 35007' East a distance of 100 feet; thence North 54053' West a distance of328 feet to the actual point of beginning ofthe excepted tract to be herein described; thence North 54053' West a distance of 200 feet; thence North 35007' East a distance of242 feet, more or less, to the centerline ofS.A.R. No. 31; thence in a Southeasterly direction along the centerline of said S.A.R. No. 31 to its intersection with a line drawn North 35007' East from the actual point of beginning ofthe excepted tract; thence South 35007' West along the aforementioned line to the actual point of beginning of the excepted tract. 99486 4 ~3c;, EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT ASSESSMENTS Lateral Sewer Main $7,000 Metropolitan Council Sewer $1,200 Availability Charge City Sewer Availability $375 Charge Total $8,575 99486 5 ~3/ ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (Parcels 14-02400-013-51 & 14-02400-020-52) THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") made this day of , 2002, by and between the CITY OF FARMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") with offices at 325 Oak Street, Farmington, Minnesota 55024, and TROY A. CORRIGAN and DEBORAH M. CORRIGAN, husband and wife, whose address is 19691 Akin Road West, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 ("Owners"). Recitals: A. The Owners own the real property located in Dakota County legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Subject Property"), also referred to as Tax Parcels 14-02400-013-51 and 14-02400-020-52; and B. The Subject Property shall be assessed costs, fees and charges associated with the provision of sanitary sewer service to the Subject Property. The connection of said sewer service benefits the Subject Property; and C. The actual costs, fees and charges to be assessed against the Subject Property ("Assessments") are set forth on Exhibit "B". NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS SET FORTH HEREIN, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Subject Property is hereby assessed by the City for the Assessments. The total Assessments are: $8,575. The foregoing amount shall be assessed against the Subject Property over a ten (10) year period accruing interest at the rate of six and a half percent (6.5%) per annum. The Assessments shall not exceed the amounts set forth on Exhibit "B". The Owners will not be required to comply with Minnesota Rule 4715.0310 and Farmington City Code section 8-2-5 mandating that all properties using a private or community sewer system in 99487 1 c:'3~ the City shall connect to the public sanitary sewer system of the City within two (2) years after the time that said system is available to the property, except upon failure of their private system, voluntary connection, or as a condition of subdivision, sale or transfer of the property. 2. The Assessments shall be deemed adopted on the date this Agreement is signed by the City. The Owners, by signing this Agreement, acknowledge that all procedural and substantive objections to the Assessment are hereby waived unconditionally, such waiver includes any rights of Owners, their successors or assigns to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Owners further waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. S 429.081. 3. Owners further acknowledge that if the Subject Property is platted or subdivided in the future into two or more parcels, that the additional parcel(s) thereby created shall be subject to a deferred assessment for the costs, fees and charges associated with the provision of sanitary sewer service to the additional parcels resulting from the subdivision or platting of the Subject Property, with interest as stated in Paragraph 1, and further waive any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to M.S.A. S 429.081. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor By: Edward J. Shukle, City Administrator Troy A. Corrigan Deborah M. Corrigan STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of ,2002, by Gerald G. Ristow and Edward J. Shukle, the Mayor and City Administrator ofthe City of Farmington, a Minnesota municipal corporation pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ~~ 2 (;:,39 Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2002, by Troy A. Corrigan and Deborah M. Corrigan, husband and wife. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AMP/cjh 99487 3 (d, (.jO EXHIBIT" A" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, the point of beginning of tract to be herein described being located as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof, thence North 54053' West, a distance of 400 feet; thence North 350 07' East, a distance of 100 feet; thence North 540 53' West a distance of328 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract to be herein described; thence North 540 53' West, a distance of200 feet; thence North 350 07' East, a distance of242 feet, more or less, to the centerline of S.A.R. No. 19; thence in a Southeasterly direction along the centerline of said S.A.R. No. 19 to its intersection with a line drawn North 35007' East from the actual point of beginning; thence South 350 07' West along the aforementioned line to the actual point of beginning. AND That part ofthe Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Southwest Quarter of Section 24, distant 1530.54 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof, thence North 54053' West, a distance of728 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continue North 54053' West, a distance of200 feet; thence North 35007' East, a distance of 100 feet; thence South 54053' East, a distance of200 feet; thence South 35007' West a distance of 100 feet to the actual point of beginning. 99487 4 (P'l/ EXHIBIT "B" to ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT ASSESSMENTS Lateral Sewer Main $7,000 Metropolitan Council Sewer $1,200 Availability Charge City Sewer Availability $375 Charge Total $8,575 99487 5 &"~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7~ TO: Mayor, Council Memb~ \ and City Administrator'1., FROM: Daniel M. Siebenaler Chief of Police SUBJECT: Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Farmington Police Department participates as a member of the Dakota County Drug Task Force, A portion of the funding for that Task Force comes in the form of a Federal Grant called the Federal Equitable Sharing Agreement. DISCUSSION In order for the City of Farmington to receive a proportionate share of grant funding provided by the Federal Equitable Sharing Program to Dakota County, it is necessary to enter into a contractual agreement signed by the Police Chief and the Mayor. This agreement is valid for a period of 3 years until September 2005. BUDGET IMPACT The Federal Equitable Sharing Program will be the source of approximately $2,000,00 in grant money during the year 2002. ACTION REQUESTED Authorize participation in the Federal Equitable Sharing Program, Respectfully submitted, , 1 \-. #" Daniel M, Siebenaler Chief of Police (P <13 City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 7, · TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator fJ. FROM: Joel Jamnik City Attorney SUBJECT: Request to Approve Easement Acquisition Nordseth/Benedict Property DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION In 1994 the City received a right of access to construct a sanitary sewer easement across the above referenced property. The sewer line was constructed but final acquisition of the permanent easement by negotiation or condemnation was never completed. DISCUSSION Last fall the matter was referred to our office and we have subsequently negotiated with Mr. Benedict regarding compensation for the approximately 8,200 square foot easement. While we are preparing the documents and title work necessary to conclude this matter, and plan to submit the formal documents to the Council at its next meeting for approval, I respectfully request approval by the Council to approve the easement acquisition from Mr. Benedict for the amount of $8,500. ACTION REOUESTED Adopt a motion approving the easement acquisition from Mr. Benedict in consideration of payment by the City to Mr. Benedict of $8,500. Sincerely, fld{;t~ #,vr~ c~ Joel J. Jamnik City Attorney ~'I'I TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us 7' J Mayor, Councilmembers, City Adminlstrator'i1, James Bell, Parks and Recreation Director Capital Outlay - Parks and Recreation Department May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The 2002 Budget authorizes the purchase of a swimming pool pump and a furnace at the Ice Arena. DISCUSSION The furnace will replace the original furnace, which is over 25 years old. Staff has determined that the maintenance expenses and unreliability of the furnace constitutes the need for a new furnace. The new furnace will be more automated and energy efficient, which will result in lower fuel bills. The swimming pool pump will replace the present pump. The old pump will be retained as an emergency backup pump. BUDGET IMPACT The low quote of $11 ,390.00 for the Arena furnace is within the budgeted amount of $11,500.00. The low quote of$3,171.00 for the swimming pool pump is within the budgeted amount of $4,473.00. ~'/5 ACTION REOUESTED This is for information only. Respectfully submitted, ~bfi- James Bell Parks and Recreation Director to <I~ /o~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us TO: Mayor and Council Members, City Administrator ltf c- f, \, FROM: Michael Schultz, Associate Planner SUBJECT: First Quarter Building Report, 2002 DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The following is a report summarizing the new construction permits issued during the fIrst quarter of 2002. DISCUSSION During the fIrst quarter of the 2002 building construction season the City issued 61 new single-family detached housing permits and 52 new townhome units. No new commercial, industrial or institutional building permits were approved during the fIrst quarter. The 50 single-family units is the exact same number of permits issued during the fIrst quarter of 200 1 and the 52 townhome units issued were only two (2) more than the 50 issued during the same quarter last year. Last year's fIrst quarter set the pace for a record year end total of 486 new housing permits issued by the City. The average building valuation of the single-family homes for the fIrst quarter was $158,477, up 6.5% from the $147,644 average in 2001. The average building valuation ofthe townhomes for the fIrst quarter was $111,364, which is up 18% from the $94,519 average during the fIrst quarter of 2001. (Note that the valuation average does not represent the overall sale or market value of the home; since it does not include the value of the lot or any amenities added to the home that are not part of the building code formula). BUDGET IMPACT None. ACTION REOUESTED No action is required, for City Council information only. ~4~ ~ s o .- 0.- G) U 0:: 2 - -..0 - c ~ 0 ~o CO ~ ::::J G) Oz ~ 0> 115 .0 :::, '" CIl ll. c ~,g 0> '" z:s '" .E -'0 ,!!! 0> ~~ "'- -gJ!3 i 'E 0> ~ zcf - '0 - 0> .~ :J o '" ". ~ '" ".0>- ~E2 ~ E'- o E C,)o> ll. O.,...OOT"'" 0"'0..--('1') ~ S~~ ",N<<)(\')LO ~~5 CO~O)"~ ~ N o o N - '" s=2 c::> ~ g 00000 ~ '0; 0> '" z~ - Ol 1.5 :.;:fll) ~gJ!3 "" J: '2 0 0 0 0 0 ~ >0.::> ~E .!!! - '0 ~ ~ ~,g.!!l CD f/) O;!NNO$! Z ~ ,"", ." o E 1-0> ll. - '0 >< 0> 0> '" g.~ Cl '" 00000 ~ 'E zQi ll. IT1II E Qial e: ill NCOCOM8 (/) U) coC>>""""('t) ~ Z an 0) 0) ~ Qi 1:: CIl '" o s o .l:l I- o 10 U;'g"ESm .,.-N('t')..q...... 10 '" '" ~ lii 0> >- 00.,.-0...... NOO..-('I) .,...LO..qCX)CX> co~""'I'-~ 00000 00000 O~NN~ 00000 ,..-LONCO...... cc~,....,....~ iij (5 .l:l I- o co Ui-g"ESm T""'N('l')..q...... co '" '" ~ 00000 0......,....,....(1') LOLO"...."'lt~ .q-cx)COLON 00000 cacao 00000 00000 LOLO"....V~ ..qCOCOLON iij (5 .l:l I- o ... 1i)-g"E=~ .,.-N(f)V,.... ... '" '" ~ I. O~OO~ o~oo~ 00000 . o .,.-OO.,.-N '. .. I I ! : 00000 oo~o~ ~ooo~ OONON . T""'OOO"....~OOOOO OOOOO~NOON..q I I o o N"....N('t)~ ,....cor---<o", : It)1t)~'''M ",1t)~It)M~NCO"'CO M ~CO...M~ ...MO~M ~ON~CO.~ ~M ~~~~ ~~~ ~ . 00000 00000 O~OO~ ~ooo~ 0 00000 ooo~~ OO~O~ 00000 0 OOOOO#oo"'lt"'lta:> NCX)C)LOLC) "...."....\', "...."....N ......('l')('l')......m CO"'ltv"....~ ...-l.Oco......C\I N 10 ONONV ONOON[ 00000 I ! .. " 00000 o < NmNT""'~ LOLOO('l')('l') ,.....C>>NOCX))P"....CX)NCO""" ".... .........It)N ~cococo... CO"'MO'" CO~~...NN>CO Nfc ~ N; ') t ~ ~ k.;<) iij iijl;; iij/ o<{ C5ri':? '0 ~ ~>~ ~ ~ ~ o co 0 '" 0 0 U)-g"E=~ 1ii-g"E=~1>:1ii-g"E=8 .,.-NM..qT"'" T""'NM"'ltT""'I:' NM"'ltN co '" 0 '" '" 0 ~ ~ !:'~ s; .l:l {3. /< .l:l o ~ 0 ....."C"U..cD _"'O-c..c ~~~~~>: ~~M~ N o o N c; o N ~'I9 j" ;I u ~ c: G) u e - II) ON Eo ~m 'c. .0 III ~"C cne. >,::> .0 ~ :c 11l ~ 15 ....I r--6 8 1;i' ~ e ... 'E CD '" E '" Cl. ... 0 I~! !~ ~~~~ en ~ ~ c:~ ii'~ ~ ~ ~ ! z~1i:asi~ . CD ll! l! ~ E 15 u. g~:I:~ \1! ..J to " .. CD 11 8- .. a; ~ 8 Ii~ ~..", ~.c ..: 3 c ~'E . ! .~ ~ IU Ci!S*** * 3 E\t)<q-~ ~ ~~ .: '5 CD j~~~ * i '" "'.... gg l! . ... ~ iNN:! ~ ii E . Ill: ~ .. I;~~ ~ u ~ ~l(W)~Q) ~ "'~"&I)\I)-- ~ ~ g;" ts.E&J: >- dJ!'EE 'E ~i! 1 i i ~~i~,_,e ,~ ii - (/)(/) (/) ~a: c C ,g i ~1il'2-e ~ ....... N (f') t- Z c c c: c; g CD CD CD .!!! . (!i (!i (!i Cl ~!c~!c~ " ! ! II) < < 8 ~ a ::l "t ,~ ~ II~ 8 l!! CD u 'C a. ~ to M ~ * ~*8~ o CD.....C8 * **?1. ~ ~o;\!; o ~~~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~m~ '... i ~~ ~i ~ Ii: 16 ~ ~ l!? llll-': '2 Ul ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ e:i ~ ~~~ l!? l!? l!? ; ~ .~ ~.ij en en CI. l/) S SS~ ~ ~~~ I :I: c CD :i! ~ !2 CD > CD C '" '" - '" to ; ~I[ "'!>1;j g tOl~ a: ::I g !'~'i :5l it llll~ ,5 ~tr;j5e! co CDI c Q. l SI,!i, '2 i:I: j'~ ~ = o :I: :I: CIQ eO .... ~ *~*1f!.**8 * ObM~:8_ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ..... ..... 0) It) "It (f') OON~~a ~ :;j;Z~18~o ~ :;j;Z:g1ll~~ ~ I~ III CD 31 il~I~I~ ~ i j '~Iljli~ j ~ III ,!! (i) cb t: ~ ~ g ,_ J~ g ~ g Q. CI) C/) Cf} 0.. ~ a.. M M~ '? a: a:~a: ~ ~ :a ;e " " < ~ e: 111 1il~-e=='!l ~ jjiiji I ~~~J~I .!! .l!!.l!!.l!!.l!!.l!!.l!! ~ uuuuuu u N e o o " 5 ~ ~~ ~:.:; !~ .., CD ~ II) ~ o a; 8 i E o U l8 :g C\i c\i :g :; ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ~ ~ I-- I~ I~ E E J! 1 It I~ (/) l/) ..... ~ ~ ri= ~ I- I~ '" ~ ~ 'lil I-': I~ I~ .g 1,$ ~ ~ ~ 'lil L9 ~ I.- ~ ;! .i ~ en " ~ Ii ; ~ ~ ~ - I-- gg ... I-- gg ... .... I-- I-- - "": I-- - ~ I-- * o .. o .. ,E E J! ~ ,~ ~ a: J { E to U. - l!l it .... ;;; ~ ~~ e~ C:o ~~ ~~ c: c cSt! ~ iii .!!! (!j E F - .... '" 0; <0 0; ~ - ~ - o - ~ - ~ - j ~ ~ Ii: - ~ .c: ~ {!. it ,~ c: .9! ..2. r- CD :is .!!! 'ii > to j 'iii CD E o :I: . l!! ",CD "':2 W.S ~ ,!la:l ~ ~~ l u. \1! 0 Ii ~ ..:I: ~ I!! C ..~J!la:".!!!~ ...JcooC'-:5l 'Eyj~~'5 :Ii ~"''''''cal~a. ,,;~~H~!l8~ ~~~~~.gmU: CD'" ~CDa: ~ '21,~ o .s~C ::l:SZ 8 :!!,g $ < 8~ en ~8 c: ::l0 '" ~ * *****;tI. ~ ~~~~~~ ~ * ****>I!&'; ~ a;~ooo~ o ~ ~~~:El~~ ~ l:l g..ooo:;j ~ l;; ~~~:El~~ I~ E 1 II ~ Ii: ~ f Sll~ XlI~i s Ej Ejo t jl~jli ::J en g 0. CO) Ii: I-- I! ll: ~ CD ,Ii L::! J i ~ '6 III < ~ '2-e=i~~ . N('I')-.:rWLLr- ~ .:tJl,.:tJl, .:tJl,.:tJl,~.:tJl,~ O~ ~ ~~~~~~ u UUUUUO J! ~ =8=8=8~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ - 'E CD 8- !2 ~ CD C 8, ~ :I: ~ a; > CD C ::I " '0 en - ~ C\j - CIQ ... ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - o o 0 - ... ~ <0 ~ - ... ~ <0 ~ ~ t., ,5; 8 lJ).c: Ci~ ;:)1-': 0.11 ""co ~~ ....1: ",oil! - I ~ {!. I- ....- ci u '2 to ..J ~ ::I Ii i ~ I~ ~ en I ~ ~ o l CD o ~ ~ C'\i N ;i!; c:; CO) .... '" I-- * ?1. .. '" I-- ~ ~ I-- M ... I-- ~ ~ I-- .... ~ (l) '" ~ i t l/) ~ :::- ~f ES_ li'~ ,f (i) i en- -0 C::lU ::la. a._ a: - E {!. i II. ,fI! "" J: c: ~ CD i..3... .. ~ ~ ~ - ~ i ~ ~ {!. II. 11 1 B~, Sa it ll: ,~,II! ~ 0> .-.!III JP ,5; l!! 1!! o 0. a.~ II ~ ::I ~ ! LL ~ ~ ~ C\j &:l ~ - * ~ ~ ~ - o ~ ~ - t- ~ C) a - t- o ~ ~ - t- ~ ~ t- I--- I.E j I~I" 6 11. j 0 of 1~:lI.~ i g ~"~I:r: Ci) ~ rt: ~ a: .... - ::I ~ en ~ ~ E'" =;g .w~ ~,~ B'ltl ~~ 2l ~ .!ll I-- I--- t- - t- - * .. t- - ~ r-- - .... N - ~ ~ - 'C i i ~ IIIl ~ ~ II~ 1il LU ct: :::. j l/) I ~ ,~ ~ co8 2: l/) '"'~ 11 i ~ ~50 Gl > :;::l (,) IU ~ c: CD (,) ~ - Ul ON Eo ~, =6_ DIU :;)"8. ~::l .0 ~ :c .!!! ~ '0 -' c:: o fI'll l!!~ B c:: ~g8 s:J II) li i!~ ~ .. ~ j!l ~ ,E .9o;g :r " "S> ~~ CD_ o CI) to .... 0::. c ,,~ co ,,' 8 'E i,,- ~ H~ I~ ;':! i~"t)g c ~9 "~ 8lZ #-~ c E:.. 10, CD," lDr.t) ~" .. ,*," ~L!:e ~I~lit~ ;~~~ '1;' ~"'c .! ~,c ~ ~ : ~~ li!l .... .... '" f- '" CD ~~~~ ~oco;) ,'i '*' <:> ~~~~ ;b~~~ '*';~ ~~:' ~' ~j~ .~, ~f,.~,,' :~ , ~OO~l$IO'~ Ii. '~l' ~ 0> <:> ;b l$,; ~ "'.... ~~'" } ~- r.no~"""~'~ .......<D~,"'"f. ~ -", ;.$i. ,~ ~, ~~~ .l1!,g~ ' ~ ~ j~~ il~,~. V E ".' ~<. "':If,,' :?i:, ~ f:' iftlI' ' ~,(/)::,; }-1'.f1 14" ;' '0 ~~ ;;'E ::~ l)4- III It tl c::!~ ~ ~;:: 'OGlCD ~ E E ",' ~ ~i~ ~I & o ~ If) c: !l:~~ ~,'i"',,",', ~ U &1 lii :1:'$:. E ""cc]i!;: ~J; : ~(3(3~P1~~ :> IS 6 'll'll $$ ~ ~ 00 i Ii '0 '0 c:: c:: :;):;) j!lj!l 'c .c :;):;) ~;~m ~"";""":cP) CD Ol <0 .............""": ~cr;;~~ .... 00 .... ~~~~~~ O>NO..........CO ;/'; ~; ,~,; ~~~~~~ N~~OO..... ...0> ~~o;!;::~ }, g .....~~OO(Q r ~~~;~~ ;~,: l', III '" :;) CD '0 I~ ~ g ~ CD E E'<: E !! oIl!,g i 0 ~ If ~ ~ t :;Ciif-~f- Ii: ... t '" CD ~ [L l!!_ ~~ ~ ~ ccccc3<3 ~~~;$5~ .-=c 't' '0=_ ~~~~~e C;;UiU;1iim~ ~~ ~> ~/ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 106 TO: Mayor, Council Me.wbers, City Administrator 7 _ \ , G Lee Smick, AICP \W Planning Coordinator FROM: SUBJECT: Consider Zoning Map Amendment - Property South of Trinity Hospital and Trinity Terrace and North of Oak Street DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The City of Farmington proposes to amend the Zoning Map for the property south of Trinity Hospital and Trinity Terrace and north of Oak Street on the northerly boundary of East Farmington. DISCUSSION City staff presented a Zoning Map Amendment for the above-mentioned area at the April 23, 2002 Planning Commission meeting. Staff proposed that the property be rezoned from R-2 PUD (Low/Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential). With the proposed zoning change, the R-3 zone would be in compliance with the Medium Density designation on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. At the April 23, 2002 meeting, there were a number of residents from the East Farmington neighborhood who opposed the R-3 zoning proposal. A petition was submitted to the Planning Commission stating that the residents were opposed to the R-3 zone because the zone allows townhomes and manufactured homes as uses. The residents were concerned that more dense development would lower their single-family property values. After taking residents' comments, the Planning Commission recommended that the property south of Trinity Hospital and Trinity Terrace and north of Oak Street be amended from R-2 PUD (Low/Medium Density Residential Planned Unit Development) to R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential). The City Attorney stated that if the City Council approved the rezoning to R-2, a Comprehensive Plan amendment would be required at a separate meeting to revise the property to a Low/Medium Density designation. Any revision to the Comprehensive Plan would require approval from the City Council and Metropolitan Council. ~S"~ ACTION REQUESTED Consider an Amendment to the Zoning Map for the property south of Trinity Hospital and Trinity Terrace and north of Oak Street on the northerly boundary of East Farmington. Respectfully Submitted, /) tJ(~ Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator r::,53 c co 0... Q) > C/) Q) ..c Q) ~ 0- E o ) U N o N +-' C Q) ~ ~ ::::J o '" ~ ~ <Il '0 <( '0 '" '0 c: C. '" '" 0 c. +::; Q) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 '" II -rIIT 'lH~ ~ 1!: ~ ~ ~ '---i a.. Q) <1.J /~D I I I ~~~ c t/'/ 1 I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ I ro ~- ~.?-~c:: ~ :J Q)~"'" I--- _ - ~ Q) (ij ro ro rJ) a.~ ~ Q.) ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ([.~.~~'~~'E~ ~~:3 S - - ~ 5 ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U) & ~ ai %&;~I ~~_i ~I-~ [I---I ~~i~~j~~~~~l~~~~~~<( 5 _ I COOaW w ~.3...J~IUa..CC..!::a..::::>a::WZ ~ ! ~<:~ 0 8 DDDuIODIID~DD W /Fl ISHlG~ f~J U& ~ ~ Nr.-'- - !o I HI 0~\ '~([[]]DJJJ . _~_ B i I ~ Jl ) \ \1 .....- 'I J .It ~ ~ \DIIIIJ B rJ 0 I l~J ll~ JIGJ 0, @\ rnm tjJn, ~\ i \;~> I rifl~~fl [[]JJ CJ) 1S: b . _ ! +sT ~, ------ / I ~r.r-l f\ DIIIIJ ~9 (f) U --=. ~ ~" I~~ J -W Jl \, <!:~,~ C [,- A ,~OrU 'u_ ~,] J~ L "IS HlO~ J~ I~ · J jhllc;lC'j ~ (I '~~ i ~ [( Ul ! a-=-r '5-:-1 'i[J ,II ~ [[[[[[J 0 \' ~f~~; I 1t:T 91L~ cI J ; ~ I ~~o /-::=", ,+S,Hl6 , I~~~ tl=, ~U: ~ 'iLJ.I~rJt"-i[lQ, ~ [19' / ~~_I'ij-"- L? [ ~ ~ ;" y -:. [[J [J K L '"a3Q) C Do [.... :[1] / J ~1 (] (] cP lJ I, = 0, ~ .---I-~--- r'- [ -'j----' - ~lljJ 1'1 f- L J - f- - ( I c8 I I Trunk ~Highway 3 :""" [) ~ [ C] (f) [J J D ~ J [r? h L? ~ A ] [ tnllJnLJ ~ I' n~ ---l , , w;V L I ~) I CJ n UCJ tl{~ 'e] cT [J[J; tn 1 II [il r] ~ J ~ 101'1 U o I ,.c ]):'J" 0 _~~_I .is HlL I \... j .. '; [J [J I C.J' rlu LS l~J I~ l l L ~J U CJ [,I[l[] ~CJ c'i [J ".u, 0 I' ![:=:1 [J D bE- (] In rr ] , [J CJ f~ J [J [J [JD ) ~1 cD I; 'I w z.~ ~ ~ I A !---Y \--- I I---, t-=-1 ....-, i[ [Li r- a () Ii ~~l f- , Jl ~ jn >-- ,.tI I(~J LJ liD Ll ! ~1 >-- '!~1 ~ I (J >-- ~J' r~J IL L".f ~ ~ [t- ~D \ - I i::;J ,; I (~] [J I [J r t icl.,[ 'S [JJ ~ [Jail C:,5'/ Vi Q; c: ~ '" 0 ~~ >- 0 1/)"0 ~ a3--ai~ -g~a1 e:[~~E ctI 0 a. a.. ~ ~ 52 "0 ~ ~ ~B ~ a> ~ 2:;'>-.S~ ~OQ) gc:gE~ H ,~,s; -g :::: 'C 'C '" '" Il~ ::;;:e::J <t:1-1-lJ..I c: :!i: .S ~ ~ ~ I (L '" '" "O~4: It ~ ~ ~ lJ.. 'E I:, I :~ ~ ~ Cl) .~~~:3 u 8. I ro en en = 0 ~~~-g ~ .g ~Q)~ ~~~~.5>-E~Z-- ~.~ c3~~ I III ~ ~ ~ E ~ .~ :5 c3 "@ "Q _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::J I rn5~c c:a..Q)Q)EQ)Q).~VJ~(/)ua::a5 .S co c e e 0..0 ~ .:J 0 E 1i.i ~ .~ Q 'I:: C U) ~>-Q)'~'5E~~~~E:J'~~~1i.ictl> . :J~~ccooo~.~O~:J:JroQ)€c< ~ coOoWWU~~~IU_ma..a..a::::Jwz . >~1 D. ~ DDDDIIDDII1DID I' I L-:J S\ [J +oJ C I Q) E "'0 C Q) E <( c CO - (/) c... QJ ~ Q; Q) Cl. 0 '-- > C- en t5 QJ C n Q) G ..c ) cJ r . Cl. E >- ....... 0 5: () f0- CI) 0 ~ C") N N 0 N "'0 Q) en 0 Cl. 0 So... c... w z.~ ::: IS Hll ~ [ - I @) R:~ ""- -"~ T~ @ 'ciL -- - u ~ U! ~ .(. a5 AI.~ ~ 1~~ (~~ 1 ~~-l >- ....... CI) c <l> o E :J -0 <l> ~ LJ \1 1;1 [f u( u r- ] DC I LJ r c.J [I LJ .J [ J [I [J c~J 0 D u c- o Ll U UrJ n 'L'J [: [ ] v O[~ [.:;:J J ri::- ] nCU I- c{y J [JO D (j) ~ n Z L LJ c;-:;:J <i: n L~ ::2: ~O U:] c-J L -:':':1 CJ []C] (J'ir'lJ On [) [J [J 0 0 IS HlL G [) (2, U C -:;J r 0 r, ) CJ [, ~ J [J I L I eJCJUc.J [ ] l'.J [J ~_-J c:) I L, [] c [ J U I) ~r L? [ -k- G5.5' CJ) +-' () ~ +-' >. CJ)t Om 0)0- C e 0... >. N:t= +-,C C ~ ~~ ~ ::::J o L ~ ~ i" , 1 _J 2J r-' r U : I T [ UU' f 0\ ~r 1 00 )011-',] 0 ~'1[J~,O" ' LJ I ~ "-i..u ~,'I ~~\2- n \J '1.7 ~ i:J! Ir< :)~r!~'1 ilt 1I1J II J I 0, [J . .p LJOrl~,'i [] 0 I 2) c '" E a. " -c ~ 2: - ~ ~~~V) ~ t3 ~ d:.s'~ ~ 8' Q)"8 ~'2 >:'~ ~Q) ~ ~!~~'~~~.~~~~~~'@B I grn ~~~~~~~~~~~~S~0 ~~~'~'~~~~~88~=~~~~i t .~~'~~~~~!8~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~;;~~~g;~~~ro I ~u~~~~rorou~~~~~~ocococ~ <~~llrnlDIJDD[J : - I 1JC~ ~ H I r-Jil [j U~IJf.~ ~ -I~ 9 1?'Jt I \ 01c:j~ ,I," -: _' k ,_ 'J..:. 51 LII- J --.! I-~\\ - ~~~~C0J r- L"1 <YY{f ~ 9808 1----- \~~= ,~ ~'~ : ~ G~ ~ ~ \ ITITIIJ B J r:, ~ ; :", ~ C ~~ SCl (} ~'g ~i Iii I] EJ 0 Zl . \ \, Pc ) \' r7 M\Hm ~ 2) I )' _)) (/J ~IC-U ~8~ ~ r ~ C ~::)IS: ~ 1 ~ R I lr]i ~::J q-~a..- eL, ~ B or;- Inn ~ a. ~I~~~~ ~ [ill ,;, , ~~~ L Q) Irl t1-= "1]7 ~ iirD] 0 ~ I (,-e;-' ~ r,~,-lt," ['J"C,~ Itr, 8 WllilJ n :J ~R-~n ~ LlIIIID 0 \~ ,__ J V-:==' L~j~~J //t +- _~ I U I~,~ ~~~_",-G[5It"r7,!', rl J!.. ......' -h-J 11r;" [~~ 0 J2 _ 1 ] T _ ,c:_~J~ L 0 I H OUCJ cc~J' oc:-. 0 ~ TRUNK:EfGH' :~ __ 7T ( - ~ - { ( I I I \ - '--~D r 1 [ --~I~ -1 I.; ~ D '1 [".J h n ='-- ~ ~ ~~r-IA J" J) :() L JJ () (/) U 0 I,:"' L-J ~:O[JSU'"'o IY"~[J ~ :=IT W 'v' l; I. []U. ~ 1Tl'f lL':> i rSJ t n ~__l.....- ILl D C;:~.1 II:~ I U:.l i cl 1(flDr;r;- ~~ ~~ ~~['l ~~ Ie) I] I .00 ~~ InID' h IL-1 n' [i ,Ii~l c' I D[.:.J ~." n trr=\ IJ L , r,; b~L ~ lli 'e Jo I"'cj ~m 1Lr--ct IO[l~ ~~ 'TT--"- ~ J U ~ ~I' I I1J \\ ~ ~,: /'J it'J" u'D ~ o [j c'] -0 C Q) OJ Q) -l ~ [ -,- ..l. c-- - 1S Hll ~ -0 CJ [jD- I(J'tJ,.,[J' Un [) I ~j CJ 'L L;L 1S HlL r~ 1'") tT I G rl J I ~ , U ~, we, [) [1 fiLl I c1] ,~' , r;J' r:,il~~l'b 1S H19 1 IJ 0 nTr DUe) I C1 -[) L .I2J:,-,_11U,: w z.~ " --; <":.1t+'"'1 ! t----/~" L J ~ IE I 'rf c"" - \"I='J ~ F= SL~+f,' ,~l ~"1' r-:r-l c.ll ~ L ,-, ~.f L \t~T~ tlTSJ I'J~ t" !.......; ~ D: ~t h r L JfI [ jlcrJ~ 11;T~St ~ ~ IT J,..J: ~CTC I~ [J : J \J~[ ], ; -" ..... f ~ ?~- ....- 11 ~ r-- iW--~ r- 0 tt ;--- -J"I~ \. J, It{ , ~ 0 '-' J[ -- - - B '--'; U;J; n )1[ - ~nr ! CJ J_. 2 J I: l)'1 r i ~ lJlld ~~ ~I DC) ~r=u ~~:.i~ ~[ 'kr~ I,L~r filLn f[f IF %1 ~ L [:::; n 1[1 ~., fD u ['] c- ~\)t:I~D I u f I I r,~ I. &,sc, IOe. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.d.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members City Administrator~, , \(,RV Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator FROM: SUBJECT: Consider Amendment of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential - 28 Pine Street Consider Zoning Map Amendment - 28 Pine Street, 18 Pine Street, 10 Pine Street, the vacant lot between 18 and 10 Pine Street, and the ISD # 192 School Property DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION David Otterblad is seeking approval to amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential to comply with the current zoning of R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on his property at 28 Pine Street. The City of Farmington is also proposing to amend the Zoning Map for the properties at 28 Pine Street, 18 Pine Street, 10 Pine Street, the vacant lot between 18 and 10 Pine Street, and the ISD #192 School Property. DISCUSSION 2020 Comprehensive Plan Amendment As the City Council is aware, the City is currently undergoing amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for a large portion of the City. David Otterblad is seeking a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential (see attached comprehensive plan) for his property at 28 Pine Street, thereby requesting to maintain the current zoning status ofR-3 on the property. The City Attorney recommended that the Planning Commission hold a separate public hearing for 28 Pine Street to allow the property owner to address the Planning Commission with his amendment application. The 2020 Comprehensive Plan currently identifies the property at 28 Pine Street as Low Density Residential. The plan also identifies the adjacent properties at 18 Pine Street, 10 Pine Street, and the vacant lot between 18 and 10 Pine Street as Low Density Residential. The School District property c;, 67 to the north and west of 28 Pine Street is identified as Public/Semi-Public and the area south and east of 28 Pine Street is identified as City Park/Open Space on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. On April 9, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the request to amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan from Low Density to Medium Density for the property at 28 Pine Street. Attached are Findings of Fact concerning the decision. Zoning Map Amendment The property is currently zoned R-3 Medium Density Residential along with the surrounding properties including 18 and 10 Pine Street, the vacant lot, and the ISD #192 School property. The R- 3 zone allows the construction of townhomes. The R-3 Medium Density Residential District designates areas of the City for development of townhomes in areas with access to jobs, services, public facilities, and transit and that are served with full public utilities and a residential density of more than 5.5 units per acre. On April 23, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended that the Zoning Map be amended for the properties at 28, 18 and 10 Pine Street, the vacant lot, and the School District property from R-3 to R- 1 to comply with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Staff proposed to amend the Zoning Map during the Zoning Map Revision process from R-3 to R-2 on the properties of 28, 18, and 10 Pine Street and the vacant lot between 18 and 10 Pine Street, and the ISD #192 School property. The R-2 zone allows for single-family and two-family dwelling units. The R-2 Low/Medium Density Residential District is intended as an area which incorporates older existing development as well as undeveloped land suitable for single and two family development that are served with full public utilities. This zoning revision would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Low/Medium Density Residential. Staff made the recommendation for a Zoning Map amendment because this area is within close proximity and consistent with the downtown residential district zone ofR-2. There is opposition to both the 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendment proposal by David Otterblad, 28 Pine Street, and the proposal by City staff to rezone the property from R-3 to R-2. Mr.Otterblad, has stated that he wants the R-3 zoning designation to be maintained for his property and surrounding properties. Phyllis Kelly and Dan Simon, 18 Pine Street, Myrtle Kelly, owner of the vacant lot between 18 and 10 Pine Street, and Oran Weierke, 10 Pine Street, have signed a statement requesting that the properties be zoned R-l (see attached) to comply with the Low Density Residential land use on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Chronological History of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map for 28 Pine Street Including Surrounding Properties The Planning Commission requested that staff prepare chronological history of when the properties on Pine Street were zoned R-3 and the Comprehensive Plan identified the area as high density residential. The following information discusses the zoning and planning of the area. May 3,1976 - Zoning Map identifies 28 Pine Street as R-l Low Density Residential. 2 C:,G'crt August 16, 1977 - The Planning Commission begins discussions of the revised Comprehensive Plan that will be eventually approved on October 18, 1982. September 16, 1980 - The Planning Commission reviewed a preliminary concept for a multi-family development (Riverside Addition) on the property owned by Mr. and Mrs. O. T. Nordseth encompassing 160 acres, with a portion of the acreage within Empire Township. The Nordseth property abutted the lots located on Pine Street on the north, east, and west. The owners proposed a plan consisting of 536 dwelling units included within 134 quad homes (see the Zoning Map from 1982 for layout). The minutes stated that the property was zoned R-l and the multiple dwelling land use was consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance. The minutes stated the proposal could be accommodated under existing ordinances by (a) planned unit development (b) rezoning to R-3, multiple, or (c) special exceptions. The proposal was also consistent with the current City Comprehensive Plan and the plan as revised. January 13, 1981 - The City Council was asked to provide the developer with general comments concerning the proposed multiple development (Riverside Addition) on the Nordseth property. This would give the developer an indication to proceed or not to proceed with the development. The City Council consented that a rezoning of the entire platted area to R-3 would be looked upon favorably. March 16, 1981 - The City Council approves the rezoning of the Riverside Addition development from R-l Suburban Residential to R-3 Multiple Residential and adopts Ordinance No. 081-114. October 4, 1982 - The Zoning Map identifies 28 Pine Street as R-3 High Density Residential. October 18, 1982 - The City Council approves Resolution No. 31-82 adopting the Farmington Comprehensive Plan. The plan shows the property at 28 Pine Street and surrounding properties as High Density Residential. July 8, 1998 - The first Visioning workshop is held for the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. March 22, 2000 - The Metropolitan Council approves the Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan. May 15, 2000 - The Farmington City Council approves the Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan identifying 28 Pine Street including 18 Pine Street, 10 Pine Street, and the vacant lot between 18 and 10 Pine Street as Low Density Residential. Summation of the Zoning Revision and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan It is apparent from the research that from 1976 to the present, the property at 28 Pine Street was associated with its surrounding parcels (Nordseth, School District, and Single-Family residences). In 1976, the Zoning Map identified 28 Pine Street, 18 Pine Street, 10 Pine Street, the vacant lot on Pine Street, and the Nordseth property as R-l. In 1982, the Zoning Map identified all of the before- mentioned properties as R-3 and the Comprehensive Plan showed the properties as High Density Residential. Staff proposes to continue to associate these properties together with the proposal to 3 C:, 69 rezone these properties to R-2. The Planning Commission has recommended that the properties be rezoned from R-3 to R-l. ACTION REQUESTED The following are under separate motion: 1. Consider an Amendment to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential for the property at 28 Pine Street. 2. Consider an Amendment to the Zoning Map for the properties at 28 Pine Street, 18 Pine Street, 10 Pine Street, the vacant lot between 18 and 10 Pine Street, and the ISD #192 School property. Respectfully Submitted, ~ /) ,/'/ r/7 /.~~ ;/ Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator cc: David Otterblad, 28 Pine Street Phyllis Kelly, 18 Pine Street Oran Weierke, 10 Pine Street Myrtle Kelly, 15101 Derby Circle, Rosemount MN 55068 4 c,.,CJ RESOLUTION NO. AMENDING THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 28 PINE STREET Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 6th day of May, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, the property owner, David Otterblad, haS initiated a Comprehensive Land Use amendment for the property at 28 Pine Street from Low Density to Medium Density; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 9th day of April, 2002 after notice of the same was published in the official newspaper of the City and proper notice sent to surrounding property owners, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission accepted public comments at the public hearing and recommended denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property at 28 Pine Street, and located within the City of Farmington from Low Density to Medium Density; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Farmington hereby amends the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the property at 28 Pine Street, and located within the City of Farmington from Low Density to Medium Density contingent upon the following: 1. Subject to Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 6th day of May, 2002. Mayor Attested to the _ day of May, 2002. City Administrator ~71 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA IN RE: Application of David Otterblad For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment From Low Density to Medium Density FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On April 9, 2002, the Farmington Planning Commission met to consider the application of David Otterblad for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change his property at 28 Pine Street from Low Density to Medium Density. Having considered the City's Comprehensive Plan, staff reports, and all other written materials; having heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak; and based on its knowledge ofthe community; the Council now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is located at 28 Pine Street and is zoned R-3 (Medium Density Residential). 2. The property was identified as High Density until May 15, 2000 when the City Council approved the property as Low Density on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. 3. The City's 2020 Comprehensive Plan was recently approved by the Metropolitan Council on March 22, 2000. 4. The Subject Property was guided based on the current use of single-family residential both on the subject property and the adjacent subject property. 5. Applicant proposes Medium Density for the property which is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 6. The present guiding of the subject property provides reasonable economic use of the property. 7. Facts influencing the appropriate use of the Subject Property have not changed significantly since the Comprehensive Plan was completed to support a change from Low Density to Medium Density. 61335 1 ~ ., c:( DECISION Applicant's request for a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density to Medium Density is denied. CITY OF FARMINGTON BY: ATTEST: Its Administrator 61335 2 ~/3 "t'''1: I .:' ' ;. 'Q, \J:J'~ : ~# /\ '>:4~'""''*'''- ~..4,.. ... tr' , ___~__ . h. I ~ I "'."':-#'\':-..-1 ' , ~l ':.':i. :~:~:; ,';' . ,_ " 1 '\~"~' ' 24 r-------.... I 1 I I 1 I ,~ \ \ \ \ ,\ \, I I I I I I I I I o ,":'" .'.',' I .... .~.~..... " , ," ,-.: '~7----: I ,. C-1 R'. ;IN:': .1,i~"J::, --....---..t7:.; . .~f;;~~ "I O-'"'f, '1'-';" ~ -;.. - ~-- I ~ I .: . 1. ,--------.-;- P. RR. F.2 212th ST ., 1'~~ij,~~ . ,IW .:.:: ,.; :... :rB": . .' ~(~ ~ 't , . 't~,':. , ,: - . ./" .\:;<.t.;,, a ;,: ..' ". {';f~~;' · '~.: ,.:' . 'ii' ,..,j:' ":'i':'; .]t".,,:' .....,::i:.I:.(;"l~r'. "..., _ .' ; ,~:".., '" '.',';" .f;j~' 2DN'1N't!!t A(Af1t,:~::~~~J.:: '. r · .~.~f .j~.. ~ <i:, >i-}:i; ,-' ~~... ...... .;111 . ~ .' ~.".." .'. "~". "~."< I ~2 :.~- . .....<r';:{:::.~S.~ .-' .'t",;, 'R h...,......liC; '~f: .~/Wih r-I LI R-A R.1 R-2 "R.3 B.1 B.2 B.3 1.1 C.1 ' F.1 F-2 "i I ";'k", " .f JI t AGRICULTURE DISTRICT Sl.J8URMN DISTRICT URSAN DISTRICT MULTIPlE DISTRICT HIGH,WAY,. BUSINESS DISTRIC GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRt HEAVY BUSINESS DISTRICT LIQI-IT INDUSTRIAL DISTRIC COltSERVATION 'DISTRICT FLOODWAY DISTRICT FLOOO FRINGE, DISTRICT : ''<''':r;# . r- 1 I _: 'ft.'l : ,) t ~ ")if S9 MINlITES PLANNING CCM4ISSION REGULAR AUGUST 16, 1977 . ., J ~ _..._...-i ,1. The Chainnan called the meeting to order at 7: 30 P.M. Present: Chainnan Shirley, Members Hanson, Nelson Absent: Members Endres and Hoyer Also Present: Administrator Ford, Planner Tooker 2. The City Administrator infonned the Ccmni.ssion of a letter received from DelUlis Madden dated August 15, 1977, asking that the matter involving his request for review of an amended plat be deferred to the next meeting of the Planning Conmission". ~3. .The balance of the meeting was devoted to a discussion among members of the '/"\' conmission and City Planner, Charles Tooker ,reviewing the proposed work plan to be used in updating the comprehensive plan as required by recent State Law. Motion by Hanson, second by Nelson that the work plan presented by the City Planner, as amended be adopted and that the City Planner be instructed to pro- ceed in accordance therewith. And further, to reconmend to the City COl..m.cil that a resolution be submitted to the Dakota COl..m.ty Board requesting $1,000.00 in allocated planning funds. APIF, motion carried. 4. Motion made and carried to adjourn at 8:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~/J# City Administr~r APPROVED WJF/kf . ''---~' ~/.5 ..........-.......--.... .....~--~_.---:----.--_..-_._-- ".-.... ---.---_.".--..-.-~,..~',.. - ,-.-- -.-.._---.--- -- -- --....--.---.--... -. --------- _..-. -. !.' l,R7 'M'I NUTES PLANNING COMMISSldN REGULAR SEPTEMBER 16, 1980 1. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:30 P.M. Present: Chairman Hanson, members Carey, Feely, Gerten and Hoyer Absent: None Also present: Administrator Ford 2. Motion by Carey, second by Feely tn approve the minutes of September 2, 1980. APIF, motion carried. 3. The commission revi~wed the request of Ken and Karen Fortm.:!n, 5775 Upper 182nd Street for a height variance under the zonin9 ordinance from 45 feet to 50 feet to erect an amateur radio anten~a. Motion by Gerten, second by Carey to set a Public Hearing in the matter of October 21, 1980, 7:30 P.M. APIF, motion carripd. ~4. An advisory meeting with the Planning Commission was conducted with Mr. and Mrs. O. T. Nordseth concerning their proposed Riverside Addition. This was a proposed plat in the northeast qU.:ldrant at the intersection of Trunk Highway 50 and Cou~ty Road 31 consisting of a total of 160 acres, a portion of which is located in Empire Township. A preliminary drawing ~as presented to the Commission intended to convey to them th~ concept rather than to be interpreted as a firm preliminary plat. The drawing showed a ~rojected maximum number of units consisting of 536 dwellings included within 134 qu.:!d homes. The drawing also indicated the incorporation of approximately 69 acres of o~en space and into 91 a~res of developed are.:!. Throughout the informal discussion the following points wer~ made: ]) The presentation was made at an advisory meeting at which the Planning Commission took a broad view of the proposal and confined itself to conceptual factors only. The multi~le dwelling land use for that area presently zoned R-l, is consi~tent with the intent of the zoning ordinan~e. The proximity of municipal sewer and water apparently means it can be easily served, subject to an enginep.ring feasibility. The proposal could be accommodated under existing ordinanr.es by: (a) planned unit dpvelopment (b) rezoning to R-3, multiple, or (c) special exceptions.,.. _~... . The propoc;al is consistent with thp current Cr~'(;'b;"r.l:'ehensive Plan and the plan as revised and also meets the criter'ia of fhe Metropolita!1 Council for orderly devplopment by expandin~ existing municipal services. A preliminary opinion is that improvements c0uld be installed under Chapter 429 without assessing property outside the plat. The normal plat review rro~edure will have to be interrupted in this case diverted to the Council to obtain a .reply. to the developer's req11est for a committment of municipally - bonded improvements, which is essential to the development. 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) C. /~ 188 8) If such a committment is obtained the normal process of plat review can be resumed with the Planning Commission. Motion by Hoyer, second by Gerten that the Planning Commi~sion looks favor~b1y upon the Riversirle Development in concept, that the deve10~er be encouraged to prepare a preliminary plat and that the City Council consider committment to the developer to install municipal services as assessib1e projects with whatever contingencies the Council dep.ms ~ppropriate. APIF, motion carried. j 5. The Commission discussed with City Planner Charles Tooker his memorandum dated August 26, 1980 dea1i'ng with the newly inacted Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Act and i,ts effect on t~e City of Farmington, in particularly, on the rp.cently revised Comprehp.nsive Plan for Farmington. It was decirled that no action be trlken at this time, but that Planner Tookp.r inve~tigate the al- ternatives available to the City when he meets in a staff review with the l'Ietropolitan C:ounci 1 to review the revised Comprehensive Plan which has been ~ubmitted to the Metropolitan Council. 6. The Commission reviewed with Mr. Brian Christensen, Soil and Water Conser- vation Di~trict Representative his offer to assist the City in the plat review process by agreeing to comment at no cost to the City on plats as they pertain to soil erosion, storm water management, and othp.r items. Mr. Christensen indicated that this review which he is nffpring could be done withi~ the Planning Commis~ions normal time table and would involve a five step process: ~) Introduction to land conditions. b) Rev!ew existing conditions. c) Critique of proposed plat d) Methods of overcoming site limitations e) Recommendations for overcoming environmental impacts. Motion by Hoyer, second by Carey that the Planning Commission recommend to the Council the execution of an agrp.em~nt between the City and the Soil and Water Conservation District for the renderin~ of ~uch services in the plat review process. 7. Motion by Hoyer, second by Carey th~t the bill from Ch~rl~s Tooker in the amount of $150 be approved. APIF, motion carried. 8. Motion made and seconded to adjourn ~t 9:40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ Wi 11 i am J. Ford -, City Administrator APPROVED: ;6 hl/~ . G,// ("', ( : Gl_' ,! t::~~~'j MINUTES COUNCIL MEETING SPECIAL JANUARY 13, 1981 1. The meeting was called Present: Mayor Stegmaier, Absent: None Also Present: to order by the Mayor at 7:00 P.M. Councilmembers Cook, Cummings, Kuchera, and Orr City Administrator Ford and City Attorney Gorgos 2. Motion by Orr, second by Cummings to approve the minutes of January 5, 1981 with the following corrections, in paragraph 6 change IIMotion by Cookll to IIMotion by Cunmingsll. APIF, motion carried. 3. This special meeting had been set primarily to deal with the developmental matters coming before the Council. The first development was that of Mr. Felix Tillges, who was present at the meeting. Mr. Tillges first discussed with the Council his request for approval of the preliminary replat of Block 2 of Fairhills Addition. The intent here was to facilitate the construction of multiples within that replat. The request for replat carried with it the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission. Motion by Kuchera, second by Orr to adopt RESOLUTION NO. RS-81, setting a public hearing to consider the approval of the Replat of Block 2, Fairhills Addition for 7:00 P.M., February 17,1981. APIF, motion carried. 4. Mr. Tillges then explained to the Council that in conjunction with his replat was a Petition to Rezone certain portion of Block 2 in the Fairhills plat, presently zoned R-l, suburban residential to R-3, multiple dwellings. Mr. Tillges explained to the Council that this anticipated action was in response to the real estate market and the saleability of multiple dwellings as opposed to single family dwellings. This rezoning request had been recommended favorably to the Council by the Planning Commission. Motion by Kuchera, second by Cummings to set a Public Hearing to consider the rezoning of a portion of Block 2, of the Fairhills replat for 7:00 P.M., February 17, 1981. APIF, motion carried. 5. Mr. Tillges then explained to the Council his request that the City Subdivision Ordinance be amended to permit the City Council, at the time of plat review, upon a favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission, to apply to an entire plat or a large segment of that plat, a front yard set-back less that that which is required in the zoning ordinance when peculiar restrictions of terrain or other natural features would warrant it. Motion by Orr, second by Cummings to set a Public Hearing to consider amending the subdivision ordnance for 7:00 P.M., February 17, 1981. APIF, motion carried. 6. Mr. Tillges then presented a petition to the Council which requested the City to install certain improvements within a portion of the Fairhills Plat identified as Phase 1. The Council set this matter aside until later in the meeting. ~l 7. The next developer to appear before the Council was Mr. Curtis Fischer, represent- ing Mathias H. and Raymond Fischer, concerning the following described land: The East 783.91 ft. of the W. 1113.91 ft. of the S t of the NW~ of Section 5, TWP 113, Range 19, except the South 643.5 Ft. Mr. Fischer first informed the Council that he was requesting a subdivision waiver on the above property which would create a separate parcel of the west 330 ft. abutting 'I C:, ., '7J' --------------. --_. ..._._------ - ------------------- ,..----,......---- - ._-------- -.. 210 on Highway #3 and presently zoned B-2, general business, said parcel consisting of approximately 2.7 acres. The remainder of the original parcel then consisting of approx- imately 15.1 acres. Motion by Cook, second by Kuchera that the above subdivision ~ waiver hereby be approved. APIF, motion carried. 8. Mr. Fischer then presented to the Council a petition to rezone the eastern approximate 15.1 acres referred to above, which is presently zoned B-2, General Business, to R-3, Multiple Dwellings. The Council was informed that such a rezoning had received the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission. Motion by Kuchera, second by Orr that a Public Hearing be set in the matter for 8:00 P.M, Feburary 17, 1981. APIF, motion carried. 9. Mr. Fischer then put before the Council a petition by this property owner to provide certain municipal services to the property in question which would require their being extended across Trunk Highway #3, from the Sunnyside Subdivision. The Council set aside this petition until later in the meeting. 10. Motion by Cook, second by Orr that the City participate in the proposed League of Minnesota Cities building program by paying a lump sum assessment of $1,522. Said sum to be derived through an adjustment to the 1981 budget by deducting said amount from the contingency account and inserting an entry under General Government, Capital Outlay, Account No. 401-50, line item - LMC-Building Program. APIF, motion carried. 11. The City Attorney requested and advised the Council to sign and deliver a Quit Claim Deed which would remove an alledged cloud to the title on Lot 7, Block 2, Pine Knoll as a result of a technical oversite involving a former cartway easement which has now been completely superseded by the platted 203rd Street. Motion by Kuchera, second by Cummings that the Mayor and City Administrator be authorized and directed to execute such a Quit Claim Deed. APIF, motion carried. 12. Mr. Dick Laybourn and a group of senior citizen's in the area reiterated to the Council a request for financial support which was placed before the Council at the meeting of January 5, 1981, with the agreement that it would be taken up again at this meeting. The Council was informed that the senior citizen's group had formed a non-profit corp- oration entitle the Farmington Area Senior Citizen's Center, Inc., that they intended to acquire the building formerly occupied by Dick's Furniture, located at 431 - 3rd Street, that they had secured pledges from Eureka Township and Empire Township for $750, that they expected a pledge of $750 from Castle Rock Township and that the senior citizen's themselves had available a sum of $2,000 and that they were now asking the City of Farmington for its pledge of $2,000. Mr. Laybourn stated that the total of all of the pledges would then constitute the required matching share in order to apply for a Federal Grant in the amount of approximately $60,000, such application to be made no later than January 15, 1981. Motion by Orr, second by Cook to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R6-81, Pledging $2,000 to Farmington Area Senior Citizen's Center, Inc. APIF, motion carried. ~13. The Council then turned to consideration of the 1981 improvement fund including ~consideration of related projects. Mr. Charles Tooker appeared, representing the land owners Mr. and Mrs. O. T. Nordseth, regarding the proposed development entitled River- side Addition. It was explained to the Council that the developer had been before the Planning Commission and that as a result of that advisory meeting with the Planning Commission it was determined that certain preliminary questions had to be put before the Council before the developer could or would proceed any further. It was under- stood that these questions would be general and that necessarily the response from the Council would be general. But it was intended that the developer be able to deter-- mine as a result of the Council response, whether to proceed or not to proceed. It was further explained, that the developer had determined that a favorable expression of intent from the Council was essential in four particu1~rs and that an unfavorable C:,7~ 211 .1."- response in any of the four, would result in the decision by the developer not to proceed. The Council took each of these factors up separately: :. 1) Annexation - Would the City of Farmington be willing to annex that portion :.~, of the proposed plat which presently lies outside the corporate boundaries of ,~ Farmington? The developer presented to the City Councll a copy of a letter signed by Odell T. and Helen M. Nordseth to the Empire Town Board requesting that the Empire Town Board agree to the annexation by Farmington of land involved in this development presently located in Empire Township. The letter is dated January 13, 1981 and the following notation is typed at the bottom of the letter and signed by the Town Clerk "a motion was passed on January 13, 1981, tentatively granting the above request pending the City of Farmington's Resolution accepting the terms of this document". There was a consensus of the Council that the City would look favorably upon annexation of the area in question and that the conditions set forth in the Nordseth's letter were agreeable. 2) Platting - Would the City Council of Farmington look favorably' upon a residential plat in that area? It was explained to the Council that a preliminary plat had not yet been developed but the ideas of the developer had been reduced to a rendering which was then presented to the Counci I by Mr. Charles Tooker. It showed a platting of lots which would accomodate quadra homes, which would avoid construction of flood plain land and which would facilitate development by stages. There was a consensus of the Council that a residential plat would be suitable in that area and con- sistent with the overall comprehensive plan and with zoning and subdivision ordinances. 3) Rezoning - Will the Council look favorably upon the rezoning of the area in question from R-1, Suburban Residential, to R-3, Multiple Dwelling? The developer explained that the emphasis on multiple dwellings was in direct response to the facts of life within the real estate business and that multiple dwellings were much more saleable in the present market than single family dwellings. There was a consensus on the Council that a rezoning of the entire platted area to an R-3, Multiple Dwelling, would be looked upon favorably. 4) Public Improvements - Will the Council agree to install certain pubJic improvements in the entire plat, in stages, on an assessable basis under Statute 4291 The developer emphasized that no cost yet had been incurred in engineering and that many questions were left yet to be answered, but that their request was based on the assumption that a suitable plat can be prepared and that the install- ation of public improvements would prove to be feasible and would be so recommend- ed by the City Engineer. There was a consensus on the Council that the City would look favorably upon the installation of certain public improvements on an assessable basis under Chapter 429. Motion by Orr, second by Kuchera to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R7-81, Council Resolution of Intent, Riverside Addition. APIF, motion carried. i"'"?l t~:. f .! -"'>--~/ 14. The Council again took up the matter of the petition of Mr. Tillges for assessable public improvements within certain portions of the Fairhills Plat. This request would consist of sanitary sewer, water, streets, and storm sewer and miscellaneous appurtenances. Phase I for these improvements would be intended to serve approximately ~~o .--:--- --- ------- -- ---- ....-------. --.- _..---~-----_._---------- _._------------~----- ---_._----.- .-.---- ---------.- .----".-. --_.. .... - .-.....-.----"'" ... 212 102 dwelling units. The petition presented to the Council, was referred to the City Attorney for his opinion as to its adequacy. Said opinion to be del ivered to the Coun- ~ cil prior to its meeting of February 17, 1981. Motion by Cook, second by Cummings I; to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R8-81, which orders a feasibility from the City Engineer ;.:__.J to be presented to the Council prior to its meeting of February 17, 1981. APIF, motion carried. 15. The Council then again discussed with Mr. Fischer his petition for public improve-. ments on his proposed development which would consist of bringing the sanitary sewer and water easterly across Trunk Highway #3 from the Sunnyside Addition to a point on the property line owned by the developer. It was pointed out thatthis.work in the \ past, had been proposed as Project 76-6 and that plans and specifications prepared by the developer at that time, had been approved. by the Counci 1. Motion by Kuchera, second by Cook to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R9-81 , which orders from the City Engineer' a feasibility regardin.g this work and said feasibility to be delivered to the Council prior to their meeting of February 17,1981. . 16. Motion made and seconded to adjourn at 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, hi Ii am J. F rd City Administrator APPROVED: II rq fgj '---- , l '-.-J '-<,,\- c::, C(? I " , ! , " :":;;1 I .. t:- . t- ---:.,......,.. 231 MINUTES COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MARCH 16, 1981 2C J' ' 1. The meeting was called to order by the Mayor at 7:00 P.M. Present: Mayor Stegmaier, Councilmembers Cook, Cummings, Kuchera and Orr Also Present: Administrator Ford, Attorney Gorgos, Engineer Cook 2. The council informally authorized and directed the City Administrator to prepare a meritorious service award from the City of Farmington to the Farmington High School Band to recognize their appearance at the Cherry Blossum Festival to be held in Washing- ton, D.C., on April 4, 1981. The Mayor also stated he would issue a proclamation de- claring April 4, 1981 as Tiger Band Day in the City of Farmington. 3. Motion by Orr, second by Cummings to approve the minutes of March 2, 1981. APIF, motior carried. 4. The minutes of March 11, 1981 were deferred. 5. Motion by Kuchera, second by Cook to approve the attendance of two individuals from the Park and Recreation Department at the Rink Masters Seminar, held April 7-8, 1981 in Albert Lea, Minnesota. APIF, motion carried. 6. Motion by Kuchera, second by Cummings to approve the hiring of Benno Klotz to the position of Maintenance Worker II, in the General Services Department, effective April 6, 1981, at a starting salary of $7.66 per hour to be raised to $8.43 per hour upon successful completion of the 6 months probation and subject to all other pro- visions of the personnel policy. APIF, motion carried. J 7. Motion by Stegmaier, second by Orr to approve the payment of the bills as presented. APIF, motion carried. 8. The Administrator updated the Council on the status of the on-going LAWCON Park Land Acquisition grant application. They were informed that because of the new budget cuts on the federal level the chances of this application, or any other, being funded were very remote. And further, that if the funds were to be made available, the City would have ample opportunity to amend its grant application. The staff recommended to the council that in considering the plat of Riverside Addition the LAWCON grant be put out of mind. . 9. The council deferred the establishment of policy concerning: (a) before and after land appraisals in connection with a public improvement and (b) elderly deferment permitted in ':ases of special assessments. . 10. The Mayor then opened all of the public hearings at 7:30 P.M., for which proper not i ce had been p rev i ously ma i 1 ed and pub 1 i shed: A) Public Improv~ment, Maple Street, between 2nd Street and Railroad Right of way: The Mayor stated for the record that no objections, either personal or written were made in regard to this project. Motion by Orr, second by Kuchera to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R25-81 Determining Certain Facts Concerning the Improvement. APIF, Moti.on carried. Motion by Orr, second by Kuchera to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R26-81 Ordering the Improvement and the Preparation of Plans and Specifications and Cost Estimates. APIF, motion carried. B) Public Improvement, 8th Street, between Centennial Drive and Heritage Way. The Council took note of the fact that certain portions of the petitioner's property was rezoned by the Council on February 17, 1981, under ordinance No. 081-104. The Mayor observed that there were no objections either oral or writ~en~.tothis project. Motion by Orr, second by Cummings to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R27-81,dete~mining certain facts concerning the improvement. APIF, motion carried. Motion by Cummings, second by Orr to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R28-81 Ordering the Improvement and the Preparation of Plans, Specifications and cost estimates. APIF, motion carried. ~~o? 232 i I j I J I I I ~ c) Improvement, Riverside Subdivision. Motion by Cummings, second by Orr to /~Pt RESOLUT!ON NO. R29-81 Approving the Preliminary Plat of Riverside Addition, with appropriate changes delineating the boundaries of the park land to be contri- buted and contingent upon the developer executing a plat agreement. APIF, motion carried. Motion by Stegmaier, second by Cook to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 081-114 which rezones Riverside Subdivision from R-1, Suburban Residential to R-3, Multiple Residential. APIF, M.C. Motion by Orr, second by Cummings to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R30-81, Deter- mining certain facts concerning the Improvements. APIF, motion carried. At this point in the proceedings, Mrs. Helen Nordseth, who was in the audience, informed the council that she had not been able to make the necessary arrangements to provide surety which would be required by the developer agreement and informed the council that she would be able to provide an answer in that matter within 10 days (March 26, 1981). There was general agreement on the part of the council that if Mrs. Nordseth was unable to settle the matter of the improvement surety prior to April 1, 1981, the absolute deadline by which the Engineer must be told to begin to prepare the Plans and Specifications, that she could enter into an agreement with the City whereby she would guarantee payment of the cost ,)f the Plans and Specifications if the pro- ject were not to proceed. Motion by Orr, second by Kuchera to adopt RESOLUTION NO. R31-810rderi~g the Improvement and the Preparation of Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates co~tingent upon (a) satisfactory surety to cover the costs of plans and specifications or (b) the execution of a developer's agreement. A?IF, motion carried. D) Improvement, Sewer District #1, Fair Hills Additions, Phase I. The Mayor took note that the Council had approved the Replat of Fair Hills on February 17, 1981 and also on that date had approved the rezoning of portions of the Fair Hills Replat under Ordinance No. 081-102. There followed a lengthy discussion concerning this improvement. The Mayor stated for the record that no written objections had been received concerning this improvement and that in the audience Mr. John Devney and Mr. Jerome Stoffel verbally registered their objections to the project. Mr. Pat Akin appeared to speak against the improvement as a private citizen and not as an affected property owner. When all parties had been heard and the matter was thor- oughtly discussed by members of the c~uncil the question was called. Motion by Stegmaier, second by Orr to adopt a resolution determining certain facts concerning the improvements. Voting for: Stegmaier, Orr. Voting against: Cook, Cummings, Kuchera. Motion not carried. Motion by Stegmaier, second by Orr to adopt a resolution ordering the improvements and the preparation of plans and specifications, cost estimates and selective property appraisals: Voting for: Stegmaier, Orr. Voting against: Cook, Cummings, Kuchera. Motion not carried. Mr. Tillges, who was present in the audience then directed an i~quiry to those members of the council voting against the resolutions, why it was that he was encouraged to proceed unani- mously by the council earlier, only to have the improvement rejected. Motion by Kuchera, second by Orr that the public hearings be closed at 10:25 P.M. APIF, motion ca r r i ed . ,.-... i r- , l~.:.; r t L-= 11. Motion by Orr, second by Kuchera authorizing and directing the City Administrator to prepare and order a plaque to be presented to Mr. Floyd Weed who retired March 15, 1981 after nearly 17 years with the City. APIF, motion carried. 12. Motion by Kuchera, second by Cummings to authorize the attendance by the Police Chief at a training seminar for Police Chiefs to be held March 31 - April 3, 1981 in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. APIF, motion car-ried. 13. The Administrator was asked to prepare his comments and rec~mendations concerning the involvement of the Fire Department in the Plat review and improvement petition process 14. Motion made and seconded to adjourn at 10:30 P.M. , - t- - : I' : -.J ~p~ful!y submit~ ~ ~~G~~ Wi 11 i am J. Forf7 City Adminsitrator APPROVED 4/1R /rl WJF/kf G, c:g 3 177 ---""" CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 081-114 An Ordinance amending the Zoning District Map THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I Title 10, Chapter 2, Section 4(B) of the City Code is hereby amended by adding the following: 25. Ordinance No. 081-114 adopted the 16th day of March, 1981 rezones from R-1, Suburban Residential to R-3, Multiple Dwelling the following described lands owned by Mr. and Mrs. O.T. Nordseth: Pro- posed plat of Riverside Addition. Enacted and Ordained this 1&1t- day of O'n~c..h- , 19-8L. ATTEST:cpZC~~.J~ SEAL CITY OF FARMINGTON B~~ BY tf?dI~4<<.-Y Mayor i Published in the ~i-~ f(L 1J1... day of C~ ~ ~newspaper , 19JL on the {;;9;<I I - 'T. .:...:. '. -. .- n'7G 7101 ___ ~. ~.7Q__ '\~l-}(--';J ~ - --- ,.,1.; - .'I'ltbZ 5:: ~ fIs - ~O~~~ 'I, 'D~ 081.1 10.5.81 · I" 081 . 12 11 '16' 81 .-,; -- ~ A - 081'123 n.160 81 ~ ~~ ,iJ6- /flUf'P g:~ :~~~ ~:~~ ~~ ._ IfYC -~ ~ 081'127 12.:.l.a;T I ~~ TTl - I B-1 HIG WAY BUSIN ~ DISTRICT == \\ B'219GEN RAL BUSINES DISTRICT ~ B'3 HEAV BUSINESS L ~ IrelCT ~ 1.1 LIGHT DUSTRIAL..~ I rei,., I C-1 e.l CONSE ~TION DIS RK:1 ~'"\\\\, F.l FlOODW DISTRlqrn ] I I III I " F.2 FLOOD FR NGE 01.:1 ~ F'3 GENERAL ;;lOOD ~ .J::L Riel' _ __ _ _ _ __ A.14c;RIClJlTIIDI= - , ___ \ \ J. II ~ ~~ \. R.1 LOW DE "4SITY I I"" \ R.2 MEDIUM DENSr .... . ". \ R-3 HIGH Q :NSITY; _ :,,~ 5"df ~ MIXEDjCO::k ~ , 30 R'~ "1 ._ ~_. ~f d \\ ,'\)..1.. .. !\ \li.L I ~ ^ \.t :; I I~~Y\ f ~"""; ~:f '~~/ QRlr ~l ,.,-I.J ~rf/;" . ~ .. - "..... i' T:\ r'rrf I ~' I~ I I I \ \. l-' ~ ~ IIIIJ] UJ] '_ //? ~. ~ ,DJ]illIl .J IIIII III .. F-2 .::.~:;.,::,~~;~~~~t~ F-1 1~1[[llll ~ _ ~mml -, :::'j,~'~,~;.~~~~:" ~fJ ~~.. !IIIIV 'Im- !ffiB ~ mIl - -: j/f~;." /i :~ ...~~! IIIIIIID ~ ,........ 8llJ I1IIIIl [Ill =+. _ .,.:;.)1' ;J. ..~c~;i~'l:'.;;'::': 'i::,~' ~ rrrrrrm mm a:rrm UJJJlI tlliU W1J =1J .... ;..' -'7 ....'.. ..,.... lH armrnrrrn 1 I I .J;>~"-::; ~.;::1 .,.:." R. . I~ ==- .. ~1{,/~~ii~ -'I_DD ~R'3i I :/ I~ Jrl.. gm--! fill ~El ~ i[ " If;" . ~~1-H~:V &s g::; , m W ~~ BB "000' " ._ _ / It;. _ en _ _ R':"2" ~1 ~~~ ~~ ~~~ :YJ I ... I ~ Ii .,. "11 Jill A rT .... t1Ugw.~I"~ I I~~ ] Ir . -1 ---- - ., lilT" ST. 1M. I .,~ 1'- I I I I I'" I h I '. .. i \.'\, ! __~_ _____~ ~. ,,'-___ I . ~ ,f- !~ r . F~ II ~ I I \ II I 1 '" ' I ,"-/ .' i '--Ik /' // -- -- ,- --Y'" -/~.----' I /-1"":::-- I . -X-=--r--- , 11'1 ! I . --------t----- ---nL---------t -~l------n II ., . . . . . I \ /'q_l J ..,. 1"-' I / 1/ V' I I I I I I 110 \ '",- ',-- \ r' ,--.1 V 122 / I,/"" \ '\ ~ '''---. . '\ ,---- "'--.. " "I I .. I ) \ ) n__L.____ < / . "'- ) v' 23 \ \ - -- ---'.. /' ~ '\ '---'" ,q.., I I ;-". I v', ' ~,. ~--~qq-1- 1"--.. t-- t.....-.-.-......----~t-..-...----.----.-t.1 ! ' ,$"'}< ..0 10) oe I 32 q--"I I I I I I ...-----------, ,J (: 1:- .... LAND USE PlAN: 1990 III 111111 I.DN DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ~ MEDIUM DENSITY RESlDENTlA .... HGH DEN5ITY RESIDENTIAL JZ?ZZ1 COMMERCIAL ~ INDUSTRIAL i::::-d PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC == CONSERVATION CHARLES TOOKER CITY & TOWN PlANNING 4Dt THRD Sf lWIMIt(IR)H... CITY OF FARMINGTON ~ <(frO .. .--.------------ .- ._- ------------- -----.----... 107 MINUTES , l~tJ<t ........ . ~..... COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR OCTOBER 18, 1982 1. The Mayor called the meeting to order Present: Mayor Stegmaier, Councilmembers Absent: None Also Present: at 7:00 P.M. Cook, Kelly, Kuchera, Orr Administrator Ford, Attorney Gorgos 2. Motion by Cook, second by Orr to approve the minutes of September 23, 1982 as presented. APIF, motion carried. 3. Motion by Cook, second by Kelly to approve the minutes of September 30, 1982 as presented. APIF, motion carried. 4. Motion by Kelly, second by Cook to approve the minutes of October 4, 1982 as presented. APIF, motion carried. 5. Motion by Orr, second by Kelly to approve the Capital Outlay purchase request from the Police Department for a radar unit in the amount of $1,083.25 with the understanding that delivery would not be taken before, and payment would not be made before January 1, 1983. APIF, motion carried. 6. Motion by Stegmaier, second by Orr to approve an arcade .icense for MaGoo's at 10 North Eighth Street for 10 coin-operated amusement machines at a fee of $300. APIF, motion carried. Staff was instructed by the Council to inquire into the change of status and method of operation of MaGoo's to determine compliance with the liquor licensing ordinance. .-;,,' 7. Motion by Kuchera, second by Orr to approve the substitution of Margaret Hunter as an election judge in place of Mrs. Agnes Feely. APIF, motion carried. ~8. The final prepared draft of the City Comprehensive Plan was presented to th~ Council along with a memorandum from the City Planner stating that the plan had been approved by the Metropolitan Council and was now eligible for final adoption by the City Council. Motion by Orr, second by Kelly to adopt Resolution No. R31-82, Adopting the Revised City Comprehensive Plan. APIF, motion carried. 9. The Mayor and the City Attorney informed the Council of the latest trans- actions concerning the Sludge Ash site selection process presently being conducted by the Metropolitan Council, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 10. The Council recessed at 7:40 P.M. to attend the Fire Department Open House in the fire station. 11. The Council reconvened in Council Chambers at 8:10 P.M. F:'~:.l -,12. The Administrator informed the Council that during the process of negotiating with Mr. Robert Adelmann for the sale of property to the City and the HRA to implement a tax increment'project for industrial development that Mr. Adelmann had inquired about the possibility of annexing 15 acres immediately south of the land in question. The Council was further informed l.- ~~7 108 Council minutes of October 18, 1982 - continued that the Castle Rock Town Board had been contacted, and that no objections were forthcc:":1ing from the Town Board. A petition for annexation was then presented to the Council executed by Mr. Robert Adelmann. The City Attorney pointed out that there existed ~etween the current south City limits and the subject property a railroad right-of-way. It was the City Attorney's recommendation that a resolution of intent to annex ;nclude this railroad right-of-way. Motion by Kuchera, second by' Kelly to adopt Resolution No. R32-82, a Resolution of Intent to Annex based on the petition of Robert Adelmann and to include the railroad right-of-way currently abutting the south City limits. APIF, motion carried. ,.-., i i I- -; cJ 13. A petition to rezone from B-3, Heavy Business, to R-2, Medium Residential the property at 104 Main Street, submitted by Mr. Richard Hansen was presented to the Council. After a considerable discussion the Mayor indicated he would entertain a motion. Motion by Kuchera, second by Kelly to set a public hearing in this matter of rezoning for 7:00 P.M., November 1, 1982. APIF, motion carried. The Administrator was instructed that the Notice of Publication should include the area from First Street to Second Street and from Elm Street to the south boundary of the F-1 Flood Plain. 14. Motion by Kuchera, second by Orr to authorize payment of the b:lls as presented. APIF, motion carried. 15. Motion made and second by adjourn at 8:40 P.M. .- Respectfully submitted, w~/# City Administrator APPROVED: 11/ / III}- WJF/sz i.-:-- 'l t:: i ,:.- i '._~ ~~~ _..,.,,--.-........--__--,..:-c=-.--,....-..-. --"- 11 RESOLUTION NO; R31-32 I " ADOPTING FARMINGTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota was held at the Civic Center in said City on the 18th day of October, 1982 at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present: Stegmaier, Cook, Kelly, Kuchera, Orr The following members were absent: None Member Orr introduced and member Kelly seconded the following resolution: WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act was passed in 1976 requiring all municipal ities in the Metropol itan area to update their Comprehensive Plans with t-letropolitan Systems in mind, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council issued Farmington a Metropolitan System Statement on June 23, 1977 establishing a time period within which a revised Comprehensive Plan would be prepared, and WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the City Planning Commission and planning staff to prepare such a revision and this work has been completed in Farmington Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, The r~etropolitan Council has approved this Comprehensive Plan t1ay 27, 1982, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Farmington Comprehensive Plan is hereby adopted. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session this 18th day of October, 1982. Attested to 44~~..; t.1ayo r - this ~day of ~~, 19~ SEAL ~~-/---~ C)~~ Clerk City of Farmington ',- c;. ~? I l,. I' I I ~ I I - I~ I I I I I I ~ I, I~'" I ~ .._---~--_...-._---=:__. RESOLUTION NO. R36-00 ADOPTION OF THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Pursuant to due call and notice thereot: a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the ISth day of May 2000 at 7:00 p.m. ' Members Present: Members' Absent: Ristow, Cordes, Soderberg, Strac~ Verch None Member Soderberg introduced and Member Cordes seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City of Farmington has prepared a Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Farmington in accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and, WHEREAS, numerous public hearings~ workshops, and meetings were held to provide for citizen input into the Comprehensive Plan Update process; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council previously recommended submittal of the proposed Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council; and, WHEREAS, the MetrOpolitan Council on March 22, 2000 reviewed the Comprehensive Plan and determined that the City could put the Comprehensive Plan Update into effect. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED that the City Council hereby adopts the Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of Farmington. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the ISth day of May, 2000. /J.."R-Io-~ Mayor Attested to the I?.,L~ day of May, 2000. SEAL G,9e; -_.--- --.-- ..,.. - .- ,..- - -.. -- ~~ ~ , .----=r I I I I II II I . . . . . . . . . . 11-". I ~ Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update FARMINGTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following information reveals that the City of Farmington is at a strategic planning crossroads, desiring to retain the "small town" character of its past and standing on the precipice of becoming a full-fledged suburban city, almost tripling in population by the year 2020. The 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update explores a number of issues that require action in order to move the City forward into the next century. This plan will serve as a compass to guide its citizens and elected officials in achieving the strategic visions identified in the summer of 1998. Change is inevitable and may refocus original planning visions in the future. However, with continuous visitations back to this document in the upcoming years, the overall vision proposed in 1998 for this community should remain intact. As required by the Metropolitan Council, the City of Farmington has drafted the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update in accordance with the requirements of the Local Planning Handbook. As part of the requirements, plans are to be updated to forecast the impacts of growth on the community to the year 2020. The City of Farmington is located within Dakota County and is at the urban fringe of Minneapolis and St. Paul as shown on Map 1.1. One incorporated city and three separate townships surround Farmington. The City of Lakeville resides on the west and north of Farmington, while Empire Township is located to the east, Castle Rock Township is located to the south and Eureka Township lies to the southwest of the City. Three important traffic corridors traverse the City including Trunk Highway 3, County State Aid Highway 3l/Pilot Knob Road running north and south and County State Aid Highway 50 running east and west. These important corridors assist Farmington in connecting to the metropolitan areas to the north. The last revision of the Farmington Comprehensive Plan was in 1982, creating an apparent need to update the plan at this time. The process for updating the 2020 Comprehensive Plan included visioning workshops, neighborhood meetings and a community open house to allow citizens the opportunity to review the draft plan. The following illustrates the dates of these important meetings: June 11, 12, 15 & 16, 1998.. Interviews with 35 Community Leaders and City staff July 8, 1998 - Visioning Workshop July 29, 1998 - Visioning Workshop October 21, 1998 - Neighborhood Meeting at Akin Elementary School Library October 22, 1998 - Neighborhood Meeting at Farmington Public Library October 26, 1998 - Neighborhood Meeting at Christian Life Church September 9, 1998.. City Council/Planning Commission Workshop November 30, 1998- Community Open House March 17, 1999 - City Council/Planning Commission Workshop 1 Executive Summary C:, ?/ Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update March 23, 1999 - Public Hearing on Final Draft of2020 Comprehensive Plan Update April 5, 1999 - Approval of 2020 Comprehensive Plan by City Council April 14, 1999 - Plan is sent to surrounding communities for 60-day review June 30, 1999 - Plan is submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review The visioning workshops included elected officials, business owners, citizens and City staff and provided the foundation for the creation of the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update. Upon completion of the community leader interviews, common issues were brought to the visioning workshops for review by the attendees. The following iS,a list of the most common issues addressed by the attendees: * Maintain a vibrant and viable Downtown * Maintain Small Town Character * Connect north and south areas of the community * Provide an east-west connector street * Annexation issues * Increase the size of the industrial park * Public/Semi-Public Uses * Environmental issues From the visioning workshops, policies and strategies were identified to attain the goals of the visions. The policies and strategies are addressed in the Land Use Element of this document. Finally, and most importantly, a number of individuals were involved with this process and are acknowledged below, including the Farmington residents who worked with this process to achieve a be~er quality oflife for Farmington in the future. City Council Jerry Ristow, Mayor Lacelle Cordes Kevan Soderberg (start 1999) Steve Strachan Terry Verch (start 1999) Don Gamer (end 1999) Bill Fitch (end 1999) Planning Commission Craig Schlawin, Chair (end 1999) Rob Schwing, Chair (start 1999) Todd Larson Ron Ley Dirk Rotty Chaz Johnson (start 1999) Parks & Recreation Commission Dawn Johnson, Chair Paul Gerten Keith Sperbeck Brian Feldt Randy Oswald (start 1999) John Richardson (end 1999) Heritage Preservation Commission George Flynn, Chair Bev Marben Cheryl Thelen Twylla Chant Harbee Tharaldson Patricia Johnson 2 Executive Summary I I I I I D I I I I I I I I I I I - I ~9~ - We the undersigned property owners of Pine St. W., Farmington, Minnesota, request that the proposed zoning changes to Pine Street West be re-zoned; R-l which we feel is most compatible with the surrounding park, baseball fields and school; as well as retaining a portion of the historical value of part of Farmington's Motto, "A Proud Past". Phyllis M. elly 18 Pine St. W. Farmingon, MN 55024 651-463-8864 M~-~ ~ Ie E. Kelly Vacant Lot between 18 and 10 Pine St. 15101 Derby Circle Rosemount, MN 55068 651-322-1742 ~ ~~ ~~ C - 7~ _ .. Oran eierke 10 Pine St. W. Farmington, MN 55024 651-460-6275 ~9.3 c co 0... CD C/) ~ ""'0 C CO ---1 CD > 'f) .- CD ..c CD ~ 0. E o U o N o N ~ ~ Q) c " o >- t ,- ~~ jj~ e€~Q;~ a..~Q;'a:;>- -oo~:;::;: ~B~ ~~ &~~eQ; <(DILl-> z.~ " .?- Q; '" Q) '" :t: ~ '" -0 <( -0 Q) -0 c C. Q) '" 0 c. 1i1a5.Q ~ ~ ~ .Q.~ ~ '" .c: => ~.~ ,S; ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ ~ -0<(<( ~ ~ ~ LL :zj -.;:::; C ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~~~:J .2 g. ~2:-2:--g ~ ~ ~Q)'- ~ ti ~ ~ ~ >- E .~ Z'- ~.~ c3 ~ ~ V) -g ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ => en 5 ~ c c a. Q} tV E CD OJ .~ V) ~ en U C( ~ .!: m c e e 0.0 ~ .~ 0 E t;) ~ .~ 0 'C C CJ) g>-~'5'5E~~~~E~'~~~~~> ~5a~~833~~8~~~~&~~~ /<jDI~DDDDI.DDIIDID i! . G II II II< ~ il II ~ s "" i!! '111 .!Ii'; ~ 111 ,~ .. C:,9V Cf) ~ () .C ~~ Cf) () OJ::; Cf) ~o c- o 0 ....0 ..c () Q)~ s.....~ s..... Q) ::J Q) OJ::; CJ) Q) c a... Cf) Q) t Q) 0.. o s..... a... I -~ p z.~ " c Q) E 0- 4) C "* t:_-- .- > ~~~~_ a:_~.~ __ 0: .~ .~.~ 5 Q) -g ~ 'c ~ ~ Z;~ ~ ~~~~~~~.~~~~~~.~~ ~ 33~~~~~~~~~~g~~ ~.~'~'~~~i~~~~~~~~~.~ mg~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~ ~N~N~NM~~NM-~~NM~ro 0~<<rnmmu~~~~~~~~oc~ <]DIDIIIDDDIDDDDDD M . 0::: S r- (j) F co o N >' ...J ...J UJ ~ C::>9'5 ,~ ~ ~ ~ CJ) +oJ C,) CJ) .C (1) cnt o~ 0)0 C L... . - 0... C+oJ - (1) (1) "'C.b (1)C/) CJ) (1) o C 0.. ._ eo... 0... u; 11 ~ I ~l ~ ' z.~ ::: 8 I i . . ~ ! 'r" I ~ ~ !i ~ ~~~ ~ - "l IiUh~ 5 ~~_~ 0 ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~() .......:g_~o_~ocr: ~ ~ III (3 '; ~ .8 ~~H~~8h~Hf';;~ ~ j ~~ u l.~~~~~~]~~~ ~~~ gl~~~ t ~ ~ os ~ ~ _~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~~ = U5 -~ ~ J '0 '0 ~ ~ J ii I g ~ 6 .g ~~~38I~~~B~2.~!!!"e.e.$; j ~] g .; '~:;~~~~::r~:;!i~~~~~~@~~ 1 ou..a. I oc!ll.CIICI1lDlD_ ~ f1. <:~+][IlDJ~ 11r:1~ j c ~~O~ C'OOUl ,- '0 .c C1l E'- u w ~~(/) C1l LL c .9<1)o~ 0- 0 Ul ,", :g .c <I) E~~3 C1l LL ~ I ~ ~ I ~ 3 l- (/) ~ ex:> o N ~ ~ I ~ '- -...:; , I I I I , I I \ \ 1 ( \ -- ~ I ~ I ~ (.... ..J (;, CY & en +oJ () en "- Q) +oJ .- .en t O~ 0)0 C "- . - 0... C +oJ Q) Q) "'0"- Q)+oJ enCJ) o Q) o.C 0'- ,,-0... 0... ~ \\ ~ ~ l ~ '{J c o -Ql- Ol- 0 - ,~ :g ,g Ul E'- CJ ro (ij2(/)W u.. ~ I 0:: \ ( - ~ I 0:: T""" I c o -Ql- Ol- 0 - C'OOUl ,- 'O.c Ql E ,- CJ > (ij2(/)> u.. N I 0:: S f- (/) F!= ex::> o N ~ I "- , I I , , , , , (..... , ,_,J '" z.~ :;: ~ ~ ! : . i' ~ j .. 8 I , . J~J i Q :=-~~:::::- t ;;:: Oil ~ !!;! a:: lD a:: .to - j i . _~ Ih~~~i~HUHI ~ ~ ~g_ ~1'l~~<il~H~~8~f~;~;;-;:~ ~ ; h~n~c~~~HH~;ii~~H~ '* ~ .g~ cO gO 5,8.. ~ ~ ~'ij:Eiii ~~~~~~"~ :g, ",g 0 ~ ~",gd.e.;s;;.<! "'~ '.3.3:H "'~ ~ Ii' J <3 u: ~ _ g ~ :u "7 N <") oq -=-c 2 e?._.......___e..e.a ........... 1 . :--.nI ",<< a. <Da,a,a,a. 0-; ~a. o-;~,?~"'>- -..;: ~ ~"""+ '[I~_"'<Dcrcrcr",,,,,,,5!~O ~ ... ~ ~'WU~. II [I:IIJJJJ ~ '0 c OJ OJ OJ -l C:, 97 _ _______J City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us I()d FROM: Mayor and Council Members, City Administrator I' < 1. · v'00 Michael Schultz t-.. \ Associate Planner TO: SUBJECT: 2020 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION City staff is recommending amendments to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Map due to the changes made in the recently adopted Zoning Code and the permitted and conditional uses that would be more conducive than what had been identified in the Comprehensive Plan. DISCUSSION Staff has identified nine (9) areas of the City that staff is proposing to be amended. In most of the instances the Comprehensive Plan change (and resulting zoning change) would not only benefit the affected property owner(s) but also the adjacent property owners. These proposed amendments went before the Planning Commission at its April 23rd meeting; each proposed amendment was forwarded to the Council with a recommendation for approval. If the proposed amendments are adopted by Council the amendment would then be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for final approval. Area #1: Willow and Pine Street Area Affected Property Owners: . Dakota Lumber Company . Peerless Plastics Inc. . Farmington Lanes . Tim VanEpps . Tim Downey 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Industrial Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Commercial Proposed Zoning Change(s): B-1 (Highway Business), south and east block and B-3 (Heavy Business), north and west block (the Zoning Map will be discussed later in the meeting). Reason for proposed change: The predominant existing land uses of the area (i.e. lumber yard, light manufacturing and commercial recreation) are more conducive to commercial zoning districts and would ultimately have less impact on the adjacent residential property owners. ~91r' Possible Required Zoning Change(s): Commercial Recreation may need to be added as a permitted or conditional use within the B-3 zoning district. ............................................. Area #2: Trinity Hospital Property Affected Property Owners: . Trinity Hospital . Trinity Terrace . Allina Clinic . Hazel Thorn 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Proposed Zoning Change(s): Reason for proposed change: Public/Semi-public, High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Park/OS Commercial, High Density, Medium Density, Park/OS Due to the recent closing of Trinity Hospital and Farmington Family Clinic the property is more conducive for the future re-use of the property as high density (Le. nursing home, assisted care facility, etc.). Staff is also suggesting amending the front portion of the property (containing Allina Clinic and Hazel Thorn's property) to commercial, following the commercial development pattern along Trunk Highway 3. The medium density area on the south and east half of the property would remain in order to allow less dense residential development that would serve as a transition from the higher density residential to the existing low/medium development. Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None ............................................. Area #3: Third St. Apartment complex Affected Property Owners: . Vernon & Nona Nash 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Proposed Zoning Change(s): Reason for proposed change: LowlMedium Density High Density R-5 (High Density) The previous Zoning Code allowed for High Density Residential in the R- 2 (Medium Density) zoning district. The City has now adopted a Zoning Code in which the districts are more based on density units per acre that would require properties to meet higher standards, especially for higher density development. Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None ............................................. ~9'7 Area #4: Northeast corner of3rd and Main Street Affected Property Owners: . Roger Thorn . Craig Gott 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Proposed Zoning Change(s): Reason for proposed change: High Density Commercial B-2 (General Business) The 2020 Comprehensive Plan called for an extended central business district to the north, following 3rd Street up to the Pine Street area. The proposed amendment would reflect the same land area as the property on the south side of Main Street (southeast comer of Main and 3rd Street). Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None Area #5: Northeast corner of Akin Road and 20Sth Street Affected Property Owners: . Jack Benedict . Brian Budenski 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Proposed Zoning Change(s): Reason for proposed change: Park and Open Space and Environmentally Sensitive Low Density and Environmentally Sensitive R-l (Low Density) The 2020 Comprehensive Plan assumed that the property was virtually unbuildable due to the number of existing easements (i.e. gas line, power line, sewer line) and required setback from wetlands. Restrictions also exist on the location of any additional ingress/egress access from 20Sth Street or Akin Road. Staff feels the property is more conducive to low density residential and making use of the existing access of the 207th Street cul-de-sac. Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None Area #6: Dakota Electric Property Affected Property Owners: . Dakota Electric 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Industrial Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Commercial Proposed Zoning Change(s): B-3 (Heavy Commercial) "700 Reason for proposed change: Due to changes in the recently adopted B-3 Zoning District, it is staffs recommendation that the property is more relational to heavy business than industrial. The proposed zoning change would still permit the business to operate in its existing capacity. Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None ............................................. Area #7: 209th Street Properties Affected Property Owners: . Ralph Nordine . Fred & Dorthy Schmidtke . Glennis Thorson . Donald & Gloria Curwick . Darren & Deb Drost . James & Patricia Murphy . Edward Stifter . Steven & Susan Frandrup 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Proposed Zoning Change(s): Reason for proposed change: Not Designated - Recently Annexed Property Low Density Residential R-l (Low Density) The properties located along 209th Street were annexed into the City in early 2001 and were not apart of the adopted 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The City's policy is to zone annexed property to A-I (Agriculture) until the appropriate land use designation can be adopted. Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None Area #8: DevnevlRother Properties (East End of 213th Street) Affected Property Owners: . Michael & Eileen Devney . Larry Rother 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Proposed Zoning Change(s): Reason for proposed change: Not Designated - Recently Annexed Property Urban Reserve A-I (Agriculture) The properties at the end of 213lh Street were annexed into the City in early 2001 and were not apart of the adopted 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The City's policy is to zone annexed property to A-I (Agriculture) until the appropriate land use designation can be adopted. Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None 701 Area #9: Murohv Property (End of 195th Street W.) Affected Property Owners: . Bernard Murphy 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use(s): Not Designated - Recently Annexed Property Proposed Land Use Amendment(s): Urban Reserve Proposed Zoning Change(s): A-I (Agriculture) Reason for proposed change: The property at the end of 19Sth Street was annexed into the City in early 2001 and was not apart of the adopted 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The City's policy is to zone annexed property to A-I (Agriculture) until the appropriate land use designation can be adopted. Possible Required Zoning Change(s): None RECOMMENDATION Consider adoption of the attached resolution amending the 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the nine properties described. :?c:::b? RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FOR SPECIFIED PROPERTIES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 6th day of May, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. Members present: Members absent: Member following resolution: introduced and Member seconded the WHEREAS, at the request of the City Council city staff has prepared amendments to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the City of Farmington, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (or as set forth in the document prepared by , dated hereinafter referred to as "Comprehensive Plan Amendments"); WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 23rd day of April, 2002; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval on all properties affected by the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments; WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments at its regular meeting held on the 6th day of May, 2002 and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Land Use amendments to the following generally described areas: a. the block north of Pine St., south of Willow St. and east of 5th St.; b. the block north of Oak St., south of 2 13th St., west of 12th St and east of Trunk Highway 3; c. Lots 5 & 6, Block 3, Shepley's Addition; d. Lots 7 & 8, Block 29, Town of Farmington; e. Property lying directly west ofthe Riverside Addition and east of Akin Road; f. Property lying south of Ash St. commonly known as the Dakota Electric property; g. Properties lying south of209th 8t. and east of Trunk Hwy 3; h. Properties lying east of 2 13th 8t. owned by Michael Devney and Larry Rother; 1. Property lying east and south of 1 95th St. owned by Bernard Murphy. ~6 WHEREAS, these amendments will be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the City of Farmington attached hereto as Exhibits "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H" and "I" contingent upon approval of the Metropolitan Council. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 6th day of May, 2002. Mayor Attested to the_ day of May, 2002. City Administrator SEAL ?~ ~ r7 - ,+. ~ L \ c: " TRUNK HWY 3 E t '" C- " 0 >- " c: " (/) 00 u c: '" ...J >- c: " 0 u '" 0 -'< '" 0 a; e " 0 (/) 1S HlL I-- I-- en en S w 0 Z ....J a:: ....J ~ 1S Hl9 I 1S HlS \ ::r \ ~ \ 1\ ....... :) ..c >< W 7o/a, (0 ;; = 0 ;; ....... 3: 0 0 '" ..0 I- 0> '" :.c (f) ;! F >< (") W N '" N N ;; o o N '" o ;! o -+, . c: " E t '" C- " 0 >- " c: " (/) 00 u c: '" ...J >- c: " 0 U 0 -'< '" 0 a; u 5 0 (/) 1S OH€ '" 0 0 '" 0 0 0 '" ,... S I-- '" en ;! II-- >- len I [t: II 0 .1-- :::;::: I~ () I~ I 11-- ten II , ten 1<( I 1 I 1 I I I I . 1 I 1 1S ONl I 1 I I I I t I t 1 I 1 I 1 : oJ ~ ..c >< W /0'-/ c, o = ....... Q ..c >< W I-- (/) w z 0: ,+, " c: " E t '" C- " o >- " c: " .is Hl.v 00 u c: '" ...J >- c: " o U '" o -'< '" a; ~ o (/) I-- (/) z <i: :2 0> N ;;; o o o o ,... ,... '" 0> N o a) o o o o ,... ,... ;! .is OH€ 7Cf/d w S I-- en f!: I"- a N ....... ::) ..c >< W Ol I'- N N o o o o C") o '<t ~ ,+" " c: " E t '" c- " o >- " c: " (/) 00 u c: '" ...J >- c: " o U '" ~ '" o a; u 5 o (/) S I-- en I I-- 00 a N )t) (j e LL I I I I L_ _ _ _ _ _ ....... ::) ..c >< W o [t: ....J W o I-- en ill S 0r- a a o <0 o a ..q- or- DENMARK A \IE ,+, - c: " E t '" c- " o >- " c: " (/) 00 u c: '" ...J >- c: " o U '" o -'< '" o a; u 5 o (/) 7(!)cf.f (!) \ ~ . T c: " E t '" C- " 0 >- " c: " (/) 00 u c: '" ...J >- c: " 0 U '" 0 -'< '" .. ------~rlfLNV8------------ I (/) ~ i :s I / \ ~ I / ~ S I-- en GG09000610V ~ I I-- 0> a GGOl00061OV ~ N I ~ * ----- i I 1 I I € AMH >iNnHl ! 1 I 1 I I I I I\. ....... ::) ..c >< W 70'1g 030m::JX3 V3W 030m::JX3 V3W ------- ----- ---------------------- ------------------------ C") 0 ~ I ~ c; 0 0 C") 0 = c; N C") ....... 0 0 0 N Q N ~ C") 0 ..c N >< ~ W g~ ~ 1S Hll ~ ,+. . c: " E t '" C- " o >- " c: " (/) 00 u c: '" ...J c: " o U '" ~ '" o a; u 5 o (/) ....... ~ .:) ..c >< W ~ ~, zT " c: " E t '" C- " o >- " c: " (/) 00 u o c: " o U '" ~ '" o a; u 5 o (/) = - .0: w ~ .0: o w o :::> ...J U X W o '" o ;; o o 0> ;; N Property Locations for Proposed 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Amendments --T i'l tI ilj I-----------------------~-~?=.-:ii:~:::=-"":'~=:"-'":"~::'"~-:_::"':";:.~.~--_________4001 - n~ r- - --- - ...- +- --. -------:--~ I :1}:i?Y"~glf~-Jr r!r~' ~'L;.x~::q..~~: :-..-1 : f~{1J;:;:'i:J~~:~lTmf~' l~ "',,: .r" .... ~ I 't....~..,.j _~s;r,l] '_" ~ I Ift-.mm. I . ~ -- .J..... ',-. ~ I '.... ..1, y'/ . e ""'l[i+:L.."c~-TC"iil'r\. . I - -J! ~ ,m..._._' : ;~~:iri~~\ ~~0~ ~>' ~ : ~ . lL- - I ~t.~!"'--r"':':"':T?-~ I ., ~ I I I ;t;~~~f~.-~.:..li};f~~~ . ..r J~t-- -- ---I "', .-- -.~ -...- ...-- -.'1-_m.------! I ~~~\;.~b.~z,;<~I,ll~~~;~: /c.d~ "'" ! ,,, j m - .-.m---'1 I ,-," ,_,".,...~.,,' <oJ. ,G. ". '~J~ ' I <' -J> I I (~';;." '." .f;.;.:';~! ' ~l1!2lltj1i:tty <.-":i'!'1 ~ I \ I . I ~J:"~,;:f,/f!~:'-'2:b~llj,ffiJlliJEJI'::~':;;{,~J;r, - - -', t' I~ I m' .-.- - l I ":r'~::1:~":,:f'\ \'i.':~llr'l Jj!'.'&Y;:-i"~''''~~'~ \, ,. II I ~~::j{ ,:'! B~t~'\'].: ~-1;l..1:tj~:!'~~......;.~........lf~ I \\ II ,/ I l-:~.1;~4Jt,~.. -" \?-.' x,..... ......'i:.....l ::Y/'<).'~,;l.. I \ 1- I I j' ~":itt~' ~ f ""'<-'.:;'if~\"~. I ,\ IIJ -';> I ! f~"'" 0iIC'.F." ~ '" . ..L_.~ - .+rr-.s;.h..-J...~"_...~~:nr'ff'i"i"Y=--.. "".... - -- __L . - -..~- ~ ..1- - ------+------- ....-----, I - I ' ~-.P;~~~ 8 (~\:..;;-'~v.:.~~;.>,;:.:~.lWffD}/l I I \\ ht 1 I j 1Ft~,'! "'~ .~;.:\~~sf,iW.n\(::.~,';\'~I/~:;_-; I " \\ III I I ,--' ",,;: ,~~:~. ,,,. , "F1'1ct~1I'",/<,,~c ".4:("",: .' I \ I 1 t _~ 1(~' t;~j'__'-:'iti~/ ~ \ "rr:.j'e ;~~timntr::2'l .)\~':- .' ,* ~. II! .1. I g~,. ,~j\I'c:it"'" j'drfrt,'';'-'f'w~'"'' 00- -- l' 1_________. ___ ._m ,\" ," 1------ __"__m__ =i ~~".:r.~ <"";;~H~~:.~:llclrj\lliLI4!~~jl~~;...::t;yllr(j f I \ ir:-- I m fi""ik::V:J[r,,-,,,,,-,qf '~'''',:l:dg 8f'1 r' I I \\ ~'~--'---. m.m___'" ,---- f1~',,~;,>kB;~i11t~ ~\!"";~1~ ~r.1 j~ I \\---,.~~.:n.lIttji) I I- . -- ---'I -' _h.._~....._....*:ij~~.~~~~~~1.f.i',195~,~TJV,~]~~~:~.gj.@;J.i: ~- I - \:.m - ,...L'''41'mnm- --- - -1-1-------....-1 , i [, n" __ ,'\~":.j~1c~l~^ ' ~~ './~ 'j ! I I \ '! ! i I '1 I ~~~;~~t-<.l;f)' 1 i r '0;\. ! Area #9 \~:, c:t~:-:' " i I I I i fj)'y~*S,~,;~ \~ '-.:It . , gro'=..,."'''-~~l..,,~.,,-.o=-'i , ".:e :0',,- " , ..-\-,-, ~ \'~ ,~, 'S'.I-j .." t>.:.;;,-~~0.ifil., ' 1\\1--1"';~\ _ --:i::, \ I \, ;;l -/"',1;";"> i I L~ I 8.;::.t.{:~:(d:~rr~"_i..-' \\-~J.';\~~~~\..1"r.i ~ '..:....., : I \\ C ~:;. I I A ~1;"~> 4' 1f~~~'-"\.J \\'\.. \ ::;fiS .~..l I"~ -"\' I Z .. :}}r.'-' ,....;_._~ I ' : _ ~ >~ t ~~ J~f~ii~(:/ \ j Ph:\ rJ~ --('1':1: ~ '''t. -( I t I 1\ ^ it ....lJ);j:tJ~ttttittt:l I tWH~H~,L<'+---T-^"-'" F;,>./flF07fi..---Tilp.~' .-----..'C'-"ti:'\J\r.-.~ 4............ .-----.-;t'r~. TI.tf1iflWJJEl"1 ~ I : ~~<;,;>u... r...~~:;<-I'~ 6h~B~::-\----------ir;?~\';:\ \~ l I L~l ~fa-ItlffiHJ:1F!:.~, --> : I I I' ~~I:i;,~ :f'/~.l'-iii , I 1'11'.';;:"'\ \ I ! ....:;:=t;j~f5;J;[)w:i'.:n~~ r j I I j---'-' '. '" v'..fl Sf'.,,'t.\ '1' I _\;;,n \ ..~, I /. -~Ef1'ili!--:=H.""y-'-~. ",--.. ',1 I i - \ \~! :.:h:1i\~A~ __ _ ~~ t~~1-~~~\~ ~\ __: -IL____~ ~~f??:-r -~\'~ . /___.r~(1 1 -1\ ~;y.' I .., t-Fi,~lC:Pt. ~----....... :JjJ:Jc;"",:,:.,... ~-- \ ' 'Tt!1i ..l.j !JPin,..~ \ I ~ --".-';-?- I I ! "l'ilf~.;;*\..J (')-=- "<fJn:\fF-~~ ~ \ I I I d ,/J:wtS:r: {!..-J.l~.P-"~ I I " fJi~>.~).5"\, v Lt~_:'-:'~:~:'>\/\~) I i ",/........q)t..-"'i. ,..", ."'~,... r-I I I ~ IrI'9 ~\(.~:\;,::.. '8:::;r \.)/';:"\'\~,-;-:'_-'1! I I _. rTrf,;-~"'i I \ r 4"~\:-' __J t j ____ _~ dllgh~y.'t"c--", r.-'~ .~," :;,,-~ I I ~""l""J.; ~.i~,t:+~.--...l rr/' O. -./ L.I, l- -_-m--I-L.,m-f-T KI&,\i:'6';~iY' \ I... ",'i~JC'\.~'" .',- '~-----tl"~~~[J,r~;"i' m~ ~rs:e~~:-J-h-' I t___ --.... Ii r --.r::r ,-J J I v.Y~ ff r.ITlliJ -- '(.1 ",,\~~-<;. I I "'H~J . ' v ~ I ",,""'I "k~' - '.101 I '1.j "t-~"" ,-.J, I <~,' . ,'~ __.__ __"'1; I ......-!.'?).~.,fi1.-t , I m / f \ ~_ \'('._ j I # l"", ~ ,/ C.......; -;: I . I ti- - --I . \ ,..--r--L (" ~\'f?jJ2_ ~ -- ___I f ll;.r-i'~ 1-f-8J~~. 1 I "'rnnn.---ml=:::::'..' '--1-- ---iT:.::: . --T--_nLC;:lkh*':':ziw~m~--,(L', m__m "11~ rYgAreaj#7~-- ! ..._.....mnl. n.....n.Lh~~___...n. L_'L~_-i.tn........--.nn.bL::4i: '~.,._..._.--:-:= .~~-.~~'lV~1=~=-':r[.1 ""~7k~~~~' :~l.~:~j:~~J I Ii III l.d-j'l~' II! " / .. I' LiP !i-~r~ p;'-",:;;-",I '/ '__2 t 1 I] ::. :!: Ol---r-- ,1L .:_~ .' ",/ l",f-;I(II_ir- ":"'"- ~Jt'-~~..;~ ~ I !i ! 1 ,__u>-._ r '.1 --r/ ~~ l01lli1l-. :i~~~~ i~~~~r'~ll--:~=ut--it'~~~-!Jc;yf"..t~i~~I~r~i: T ,--\ r ---T 1 - lj;__--L_~.~_ ;-- _I ~- -~-!---~- --- -- t .1..__________._ ----~)...L=--="-~{~..- ~;~;~t4:I"- !_-I,~;~:~Ari;al#-L ~tir.TIlni1 ----- __I I ~fiJof-~-:- . 'niB. JI;'ill1dm1it!rjt_~oillJ I I Area #8 : I ,l I " 'T,..iL-1f;~:1!~~~iF]~'~~'''~ : I I : i~ ' " -- .Jp,]. s~1~~r3'~t4~C 55 L I I I j 1- - !r:'~~~m~F~rl--l~ -~~ 1- ---1 I I' t tovf~~'.'rmT" "F',:;". 1 [----t , itEm I I I . 11, (I ..,t:""'tjio ""'i~ "tEl"",!" J'l~ltj ,,'j rr---~ I r-----, l-::l I , ,i ? ',' '~7i;ll~$ll:i.t':i!fg~lfjj~~l....I~l~f.tl!L ~_,i'JI. r'j I 1,-, i ,.-, i .-----------------------------------------------~~~--------~rD.' I ---:~~.-~~~~,8~~~JC[L~;L!-~=:H~~'~S~ : ~ : :i' ,.-W ArE!a;!l-1~;::;__ __.1 'i--'i I ! . -!. I" I I fff~Z~~J.""~ I -1 I r--l;l-~ I I I ,/, lJ~n=;j1!1t 1::'1 I ' I .. I . ~- - -1.J.:;~ILTr)~ -----t..,-~-4 ' 1.. 'I bF.~"''': t!~~., I I /\ :' Municipal Boundary Area IF' I / ~r,;;0~j,~Jl~H:.}---' . 1 _ /_ : I / 11i~1!;'fu.!:f~~::j1fii . 'i:,'TTlrj J' _ City Parcel Map ...------- '_m 1__________~.'mL,_" --,--".l.Wl...J. 0.5 , o 0.5 Miles N w+, Scale 2000 , o 2000 4000 Feet s SooM-ee: a... mllp.OeI.otaeo.....yL..-.d& s..v..y0ep.r1..-.. Cf_ed toy: CiIy orh~Plltrning OMs",n /OS '" ~ '" <l: ~ '" -0 <l: -0"-0 c: a. " '" 0 Co :a5Q3.Q ~ ~ ~ .2. ~ ~ ~:€::> c:it .!: ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ ~ "8<l:<l: .Q ~ ~ LL~:2 C I U) (I) Q) Q) c: c E ~~~ ~ g- ~>->- >..&J Q3~ ~a;~~~ ~ 5.~ ~~-8 ~ U) ~ ~ a: ~ g ~ ~~ "E ~ ~ 0 c (f)C~E E ~~:oOc~Q)(/)- Q)~::> Clg~ c: C:'CiiQ)Q)E~Q)sg~.~~a::U~ ~~a;~.~~O~~~~~.~~~~~~ :J.,!:E c: C:-a5~~Q).Q>o:J::J-gro-eQ)C:c{ CD.:'eW w a....J....J:EJ:()~m_a..::>a::wz <<'10 18 DD~IIDDIIDI[JD ro ..- =t:t: l. ~ .:::. lS Hl.L ~ [ -=:-J I ! I 1,g ~".- ["0 1 (J :2 LJ [ ~,.3 I L: I c;:~ [",. J .is Hl.9 I ['] 0 L JCJ C L-'E I _ J L] ; r] C;Yo r J ~ ~ <l> ~"- [- 1 c l." ....J r L I Jft "1 tlJ Z.~ :it '[ J !c i lLr J ~l T' 1~ ,[ J LJ \ l ,-_~J'L I I-- en ~1l :2 [) r rl jC - ,r ~-l '- " ~ f 70C, ..0 or- =t:I: c.. i ..... C 0) E -c c 0) E <( c co a.. 0) > .- en c 0) ..c , c.. E o (J o N o N -C 0) en o C- o L- a.. '" ~ '" <( ~ '" '" <( u" '" c: c. CD '" 0 c. :a:;Qi.Q 3: Iii ~ ~ 0 CD .2...5 ~ "'.c:: ::l ~.~ .5 ~ ~ ~ a. ~ ~ U<(<( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~ :g ~ Q) C C Cf.I E ~~~:J ~ ~ ~?=~-g.~ -g ~Q)~ ~ ~ E E ~ >- E ~ ~- ~.2- ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~.~~_~~ j:g:J gSc c~~Q)EQ)Q)~Cf.I~WU~~ mcee~O~.20E~~~Q.~cw ~Q)'S.5E~~~~E~.~~~~m> ~~c coooS~o~~~mQ)€c< UoWWU~~~xu_m~~~~wz <]D.~DDII..D~..DID i!? CD c: _ ~ ,g >8 ~ :g t.... () C ~~~~ vi >- a:~o:g~~ "'C....J(I)o,c~ ~~~.5~c3 CD -" CD E E E ~~~~t=t= .is HJ.L E "0 Q) o .is HJ.9 o .....J 1S Hl9 .~ OJ z.~ ,. l- (/) Z ~ ~ ,/ci7 ..0 N =t:t: c.. ~ . +-' C Q) E '"0 C Q) E <( c co (L Q) > .- en c Q) ..c , . c.. E o () o N o N '"0 Q) en o c.. o So... (L l I >r{ L I l~~ \\_1 c! _J -I- -- L J J I , I I j I r '-- ~ ~~~ V EJ &1~'.8i ( c::J c::J Fj ~ ~ E3! ( B .,~L' .~~. ~ \ ,...- T. . '" .:.'-;-", ~J!.i ,:t"%":'~..J 1.'~.:..\.'~~.~.:;:~~~i;.:I;iI1.'~D 8 '~I;":' ";~::"~':+~";i .~: ~ I ., ",'" "^~ F' ;' I.-..~ (;J'.~ ,\, ::,:"';: _'A"i'r$<_'~'~' '::. _ (I ~ ~'. . '-"~J.{~ :l:'Y"'f',>;., , ~_"",'- ~ ';>~'w7~,Il'oJ" ',,: t ~~\~ \{,:'i'li~f ~;f',1 - ~. i~-":' ><.~~~~~ ", J:-o.:,.- ,. ~.X)~' ,e,i,:" ~~i~ '~.~."."..' <.....'.ft<:,.... ry, ~'~;~ ':~<:;:;,;kr"';' ~i' 0 cCJ ',., l 'i, tin;: ,r:'''''; D \';t~ ,,(. ::,~t~.~: I 'f: . n ~' .:~,,~ :~ :rnrrm-~' ;7."-' ":.~. '.:'. '..I.ii.' r I . ;'-':," - :~~' 0 ;< ~.~:,wmtf.'~ 0 \~ .' .- _t~~:::; .,'\'~~.:....,' AMH >iNm:U. (~r ji .is HlL f-- f-- - I I I I I I I I - - I I I ,', ;~".\ E~ . ~'.iii ':C c: 'Q>}Q> ,!.'~o ,. ... "ail u f--- - --r I I. - - I I ~ .0 G! Q) or:' ,.,{~ ~;.., '" " '" < ~ ., u < u" u ~g-8. ~~J2 ~ ~ ~ .2..~ 1? ~~~ .~ : 0;;; ~ ro ('t'l Q. " " '8 .<: .<: ~~ .~ .~ c ~ a, ~.~ 1G \1) 3.~~~~ 0 [ o1UUJUJ .- 0 >-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ \1) ~ ~~~EE~~E~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~j~~o~~_~\1) i1G~ t .~ ~ ~ ~ e e ~~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ J. ;g >- ~ \1) "S 'S E 3': 3': "0 ..c E ::J'ii.j D ~ 1;; co > ,I ~58~Jj afi8.9.9~:f8~~~~&~Jj;2 t <<~~D.~DD~I..DD..DID ; ~ Q) c: ~ o >- U ~ ~ -:s o.s ~ u e.c. ~ c: E ~~~~~ Q)::I: c..... ... >- >..- - ~~~~~ <1-1-lL.I .is HlZ ~ ul t~ ~'\\ (/ j':'>-c !E "1'. :i :~~~ ;~<, \11<"'- g .,.-.;/.~t. .- - ....~~ ~~-:{":i~ i~~j~'~:-' . w" ~ '~~~ rL '- LL I. l,r --'. ] III ! '" ro 1 - --1l ~lc~l- ; -> ~ .is Hl ~ ~ ~-? f'-- (J Ii ~ l_~ T"-I .Jl ~ I\.. ~ ~ --=- r L U-_ ~ ---'--'--;- I r~J r'-. ~I 'u Lf LJ .is HlD ~ 11 r,--'-----' f '\ ~ JL ~ LJ ['] ~ ~ II z.; L, ~ ~ ? R- il t;:j lc]IC';J-n .is Hl6 11-- .....r /\, r r, l 1 L. L ,-' 'i r' ( lL - J-,-,- 1 n ] " LJ >j ---LL r [ ]'j [~ ~J CJ [) l J Cl- n --"~r . ,)I' '-.' ,-,,'W ~J1~~~ ~,::,',ji,t.,. '~'r~ '-;;'?:-:--. I ~ %-1 ~I - r A ] r J" r [ :I , J [ LJ LJ [ ~ 0 7'1 l 1 i U (c {l'; L'te, \(, L :; 1 \rl' 1 c' C ~ J[ J UJ z.~ " ~ 1:1 il (j I - --r- l I ----' ~ ~ r-l ~ [F II ~. ~ - - I ~ iL '\:-:, ---"-- r1 j V '---- [: 1 n- ~. ~I ( 1 ( LT , L J r -'" ] U f- C1 'L J C ej, J [) J [ } [',:, '- J I I,~ - 7CJ'7 -- co N =t:I: c.. c co - a.. Q) > .- en Q) ..c Q) ~ a. E o , ) -' N o N +-' C Q) ~ ~ ::J o r' T ---"" \ \=-u '---- !I ~ ~ l i.~ _~l ~' fty~~~ umrro R pt~ ~l ! []]] [ill] ~B B bi~ ,~. '." ~ ':~,,~'A~ti., ...;:-7$ :ITOJ] ai n ~ ". mm~,bjl' 0 G ? "'r' 'q %'!FI~,I!:' "'.;" >;~: ;(;:' ",',' -'.'." .~. ~.~ I""~ ::< '<...: \ ~'r ~t~ .:': {...;.1,,'II 'i ," '<1 J :'~',-.. ". ' I ,. . ~J" ",';:,'~/ :,~ ";;; :~'::~:, 1 .~~!~~~(' ,i lf~ ~ _ .. ~ ;",u'!~~X:;);; ,,' f~!~\;...;t. ~:'~ . ' '!z<~ ~ .{.t'J!i;;;{.~' ,<: ~. fif;. ti {] o t~~, i :'; ::;,. .:~;;:. , 'R~~tj, ~ r~~r,c < ~ " :'1:'~,:> ! (;:; 0'::~~:!~ ! ~ "(mt /-rJ I ,i~: --"'-! j, --.' , 1'/ ....-- ',' =~"., 1/ /' ' .., -",:\,",,' ',' :,~. :~. ',~ .>i!r-' " ox' ,_, ,w ;/ '.~' o !l o a \l Trunk ~~ighway 3 [. ...-' , 11 . .J T r J c, n..t s ~ C/) I ~ M T"" C\I f f----' Q J f----, ; I- I I ~.. 'I "'1 l l -I . ! 1----- ~ I I ~ F-- ! I I J -r ... 1 '" ~ ~ '" 'C <t 'C '" 'C c: a. " '" 0 a. ~ ~ .Q ::: '" ~ ~ 0 '" .~.s -g ::;::€::> 'C ~ .!: .~ ~ m ~ ~"O<< o ~ ~ g; ~1.L:2:2 ~ .~ .* ~ ffi E ~tOV)(/) ~ g- o. ~ a. ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C1J ~ Ci; ~ ~ gene c [L ;:;. E ~ ~Cij'.!. co ~ ~ -g vjc:-E~~ ~~'~:6o~"~~~- ~"C::> g> 5 .8 ;g c: c: 'ii) ClJ ClJ E ClJ ClJ fJ) VJ"~ en a::: .s c: :em &; ~ e e C:O~.2o E1? ~(i)~ c:.gJi ! ==z.,2> E':;":; ~ ~ ~"C&; E:O"ii):j-c co(i) ~U~e~~~~~~f8~~~~5~~~ < ~::D] 0 ffi!!!DD~IIDDiIDlrn 11 WJ z*" ::: 1 .is HlG ~ r ~.~ :i\ I -G,\ '\ . 1 I [ - ~ L) ~ o ...it>- '.'" '.r, W I[ ,r , .~ ; :,--IL...,.J f J'J ,J~ lS Hl ~ ~ '}'~ ~ : .. ';:':~~ ,~I[ I ~ ']11 / /.- i ~ ';""~1~>:' I--I! ~rJ ~. Z~( r :' . .; ~~ ' en~ [ l, I' " ~i~ f ' ~ lll~ ! I ;. '.... ,J: O~>] [:-J ~J ~ LJ ~-J ,;l .is HlO~ ~l J_C; '),' ~ [ ~j c-:=2 / . ,,:. I [, t i __ r U ~ LY r- [' [1 I~) CJ r [Ju- O 1.' n III ,J j ~] I r r",' [' - "J / ; I Jl 1 r:,)' J ~ l'- c .9-;; Ol = L.S2 10 I L [~ ,S2j =,~ <co ~ r l' ; . F,- L r- ~ ] l J ~ r I;- L L. L ] / T) !' C -- - , J - C. J r ,- r L -" Ii ,- ~. . Ii J r ;: t J I [ 1c a L J 1 ~ I: 11_J , r.~i I - 7CR' c co - a.. Q) 0 [J > .- en Q) ..c Q) L- a. E o ') ) N o N I I It] i DU il-,) [] fIr l [ 1, [ -J 1. CJ I L ,J' 1 _ ] l _ J I i. ro C") :t:t 0- i r- ] J L=f f r J l [~ ] [ _In ] [ J r~ u f'[] 18 O~f; [1 r [ ] -]' l_- 1- Ll o (J I.~ I Ie} I J ][ l] ! II L J !s ~ ! !~ ~ l-l [] [ J !~ ~ I - !oo o 1<( ,~ I I~ U i r ] I~ J I' I I [ 1 [J L '] r ! [I, I~ lit J l I 10 V 1 I~ ] l _J ~J [~-J [ 1 (J [J +-' 53 [ - L- L- ::J () 18 ONe r) f l J [-J 1[ ~,J r 't] L - 0 - J l '-J r j 1, _ _ - '-JJ [ , 1 r~ - _ rL 1 ] [ J 1. r o u ~ ~D e D (L +oJ U Q) . -..,. ..c ::J CJ) L- '" ~ '" <{ ~ '" "0 <( U Cll "0 c: a. Cll '" 0 a. ~Qi.Q ~ aJ ~ .~~ ~ "'.t: ~ ~ ~_5; ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ e :;1<(<( (5 Cll Cll u:~~ c: 1'(;5'en Q) ~ c: c E ~~~ ~ ~ ill>->- ~.o Cll~ ~ a3 ~ "(ij ~ 'Ci) a~ ~ ~ ~ '" (/) E E c:: ~ E IE -~lii .~ ~ 5l 0 c: U) -g~ ~ ~ ~'~:6O ~'Q Q) (/)"Cij Q)-g~ o>:J co C C:'- Q) Q) E CD Q) V) f/) 'C (f) a::: U Q) .5~c e e ~O:E:JO E~ ~1ii~ ~E(f) ;g >-~"S;'S; ~ ~ ~~-a5:g'~-5~-e ~ i;<e ~l5 e Jj tTI ~~.9:E:rUo..CDEa..:::)(rwZ :; ~1 01& DDIIIDDIIDICIJ OJ z.~ ~ o D c o o [f 7/0 ..c ("') =t:t: a. m ~ c Q) E -c c Q) E <( c co - a.. Q) > .- C/) c Q) ..c ) 0.. E o () o N o N -C Q) C/) o C- O L- a.. [: t j [ ) L-] Q [J o J r r 'J. ,; ---tr L [ 1.. r 1 l .' L~ J . 1.-J L 1 L j L _ J I s J] [ J [J L:- i [ -] [- 1 [--~: : [.r L 0 Q 0 [-E! .::J, [) "0 LI J ~ ~ 0 ....J I [1 [ :J;-L Q, [ [_j J [J [ r fj [ ( J u [J I I 18 O~8 1{] [j [ -] CJ --' ] r ] [-~ L .., I [- .- .J I C/) >- [ 1 [J 0::: i'J 0 IL q ~ , - () , DI I 10 rJ \ 1 [ L..J- J (J 18 ONl l [ trs] l 1 t--s [ )-: l \ (t ] J r J 1 J ~J I I I i -:1 l [J. L -",-_ 0 ) (--1 S. . -.. '-~'i L]r --. j [ - ~ l I ' -I i \ [ w z.~ :< ;,; a; c: 3:~ o~ >-z i~ e~ ';;00 " c: -0 u c: " ~ :t: " <> ~ '" ~ ~ <Il U < U " U c: a. " '" 0 a. ~ ~ 52 ~ " ~ ~ 0 " .Q..s -g '" ~ :J ~ j!: ~ ~ ~ ll." " ~ ~ < ~~ .~ .~ C ~d>'~-~~ ~ 5~~~:::> .2 g- CO~~~-g ~ :g ~Q)"" >.<( Q) ro ro <<) 'en -t:: a. Q) ~ -8 ro ~ (f) C C ...J ~ E ~ .~ro m .~ 0 Q) C 1I)-g~~Q) Q) ~'iii:60 ~'o_'; ~ "C:G=> 05-79 ~ ~o: lB CD E Q) :u.~ II)~C/)~a:: ~ :5 co ~ ~ e e o.o::e.~ 0 E u; ~ .2 ~:s :ij U) ~~~E~'~~~~i~~~'~:gro:G€~<( muugwwu~S~IU~CO~~a:::::>WZ <<~~D.~DDOO~..D~..DID ~{J ~D ~ a.. ....... () Q) B ::J C/) o r= c::=J o D o n 7/1 c ro - C- O) > -- en 0) ..c 0) L- a. E o ') -> N o C\I +-' C 0) L- L- ::J () , t J r," ro ~ =l=t: c.. { '" ~ '" <( ~ '" "0 <( -g Q) "0 ~~~ 'aJ~..Q 3: Q) ~ ~ 0 Q) .~.s -g ::;;E::J C ~ .s ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ e g-;-; LL~~ 'E .~ .~ .~ ~ -cn(f) ~ a. ~~~C >-.c 0 ~ aJ (tj (ij m ~ a-t ~ ~ lis ~ ~ 13 ~ a: ~ g ~ ~~.~ ~ ~ O-g f/)5=EE~~~oC:~Q)(/)- Q)"O:;:l gos c: C:'u;aJQ)EQ)Q)(/)U).~VJO::~C: ~m~eeC:O::;;"OEb~-Oc:~Q) ~>E'5.5!~~~~E~'u;~~mS(f) ~~etTI Jj [3S~:f8crcE~~5~~~ :::<~ 0 ~~~ DDrJllDDllDIQD ~ J UJ z.~ ~ [ l~ [, ) r ] J 1 c J ~, 18 H19 S" S" [11 [ ""L 1 r- .r l I-- (j) Z <( ~ I-- (j) ~ .....J L!:! o LO I ~ (j) cj o 7/~ ..0 .q- :;:t: C- m +-' C 0) E -C C 0) E <( c co 0.. 0) > .- en c 0) .c , . c.. E o () o N o N -C 0) en o c.. o s- o.. ~ Ql c: ~ o >- 1:: Ql a. - e E c..Or; "O~o .s~" uQlCl ~ g>'~ ~o:<..> '" z.~ :< 18 HiS '" ~ '" ~ ~ ~ u ~ "0 Ql "0 c: a. Ql '" 0 a. :ai Q; ,g 3: ~ ~ ~ 0 Ql .~.S -g :::;E::l l: ~ .S ~ ~ ~ c.. " Ql '8 4: 4: o " " ~u: ~ ~ en ~ -g~~~:& E g:;:;~~~ ~ g- al~~~-g ~ .g Q;Q)lo... ~<( Q) CO CO n:l "(i) i! a. ~ 2 ~ ~~~~ffi~~~~~~ ~.~ o~c c:E~E E!2~:ooC:~-V)Q) ~Q)::J g_Sc:c~Q)Q)EQ)Q)~V)oooo~~~ m ~ &i .g g ~o :::; ,g ~ ~ ~ .~ ;g ~ :s ~ (/) ~~~~~o~~~.~o-g~.gn:l~€~<( UUeWWU~...J~xu_mc..c..O:::lwz <~]DI~DD~IIIDOOIIDID I- en ~ -.J W //3 c co - a.. CD > .- (j) CD .c CD ~ a. E o f) ) N o N -+oJ C CD ~ ~ ::J o co LO =l:t: c.. l . "' z.~ ~ '" ~ '" <( ~ en u <( "C " "C c: a. " '" 0 a. ~ "ai .Q ~ i; ~ .Q.~ ~ '" .c: :J ~.~ .!: ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ ~ "8<(<( ~ ~ ~ c , 'fj; 'en Q) .~ a5 a5 u [ n; (I) (I) = 0 (/)>> i!:'.c a;~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ "m 5.~ ~ ~-8 C'O (I) C C a: >- E C :?;-- .!. C'O ~ 0 c: (/)-g~~ ~ ~~:6~'~'~~~- (lJ~=> C)5~ c: C:'(i)Q)Q)EQ)Q)(I)V).~(/)O::t)g ~mg.g.ggo~~~~~~~~~E(I) =S~E E: E: ~ ~ ~ 4>,g>o.g~"O ro€ lfi E:< lDUeW w a.....J...J~:r:ua..m.=:a.:Ja::wz < <l 0 !~~ DDIJIIDOIIDIUilllJ s s S E l- I- I- ID en en en en I I - I .~ I- ~ l- I- .0 co I"- co 0 0 ::J .....J 0 a.. N N N 7/</ .0 I.() =t:t: c.. o > +-' C 0) E "'C C 0) E <( c CO - a.. 0) > .- en c 0) ..c ,) . c.. E o o o N o N "'C 0) en o c.. o L- a.. M ,...,.~ ~.-l ~ ~ Ql c: ~ o >- t Q) <i: a. t) en 0'- c ~"O " ~~-g .$mm u-'" c ~~~ OJ z.~ " ~ '" ~ '" <I: ~ en "0 <I: -gQl"O .!2~8. "aJ~.2 ~ Ql ~ ~ 0 " .~.S -g ::;;:€::l 'C ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ a.. Q) e "8 < <I: ~ ~ ~ In C I VJ (/) Q) Q) .~ ai ~ ~ .2 &. ~~i.~ ~ :c ~Q)'- ~ai (ij co tel "ij) ~ a Q) 2: ~ n:I (/) 'E' C ....J >. E c: i:'- co .~ 0 CD c: "C >.<1> Q) c:~ ::l~.iii.!2 a.. E "C f/>:J ~g~g g5:~~Ea5~~~~U)~&a; :g Q) &i J~ .g 0.0 :E :6 ~ E ~ .~ ~ ~ :s ~ en ~~E~~~~~Ql9~"O!~i~€~<I: mUeWWU...J...J::;;~UEm~~~::lwz <<]D.~DD~I..D~..DID f f , + ~ '!!t;'>J1 7/:5 c co - a.. CD > .- CJ) CD .r::. CD L- a. E o , ) ) C'\I o N +-' C CD L- L- ::J o co co ::f:t: c.. i ~ boJ ? r (J---1 <0 C:J [ ] l.SONZ .~J [J I I I I I 1 I 1 . I i U q 1 I 1 I tJ SV 1-0 CJ)CJ ~~ OC] ~ UEJ Illj D U r1 DI GoCF o o o t5 ~ Q) Q) . -.. c.. .00 :J ..... c/)Q.. DENMARK AVE c=:= ] I c- L=JD ~ Ul z.~ ~ c L 0 o 0 o 00 0 D 0 0 0 0 D '" e '" <( e (/) "0 <( -g2i~ ~.Qa. a;~.Q ~ " ~ ~ 0 " .~.s -g ::;: E::::> '"2 ~ .S: ~ ~ ~ a. e e ~<(<( ~.~ .~ I ~ ~ 'E .~ a5 ai ~ ~ ~ (/) .\1 a. ~:ii'iij~iii .~:g ,,~~ ~Ulc:cC::>-EC:~ '?-~ c:a;" (/)~~~~"i~~~~~~ ~D~ C>>o!9 c: c.2: c:"O c: t:? Q) (1)- Q)"'O:J ~<O:ii.g e :g~~~~~l8:g:s~[l:~:ii '5~E~~~~~~~E~.~~~~EW ~~JW ~_~~~::;:I8~.il]~5~~;2 ~<~DI8DDIIIDDIIDI00D E Q) C/) - .2 .0 :J Q.. ~II ?/(d ~~ L-JU D c=J 0 o [rn 0 0 D 0 o 0 c::: 0 U 10 ::r: rJC "~ 0 .0 J' [ CO U ] 0 bL ] 0 =t:t: c.. .is ONZ J ~ -1.. r-- ,_.---J" "'L ] L r- '- -or '- I ...- C CD E "'C C CD E <( c CO - a.. CD > .- m c CD .c ) . a. E o o o N o N "'C CD m o a. o s.... a.. UJ z.~ ~ ~ 'r' Q) c: . ~ g 0'" '" ~~ o.~ ~~ 'OW ~.'!l u 0 Q)-'< :z:: '" <(0 '" ~ '" <( ~ Ul '0 <( 'OQ)'O c: a. Q) '" 0 a. i CD ~ 3: ~ ~ ~ 0 Q) .2...S -g "'.<: :::> ~ ~ .5 .- l/) II) .!2 m m a.. ~ ~ '8 <( <( o Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ (/) ~ ~ c: c: ill E ._ Q) IV::::> <.> Q. ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ .,..c:==_ i;' -><" >Q)" t,..- Q) m .s '.. l/) ~ Co CD ~ 1:) ~ (fJ ~ ffi ~ ~ g ~ ~~ ~ .~ 0 ~ c: l/)C:~EE.!2~~OC:~-l/)Q) ~Q)::::> OlS!9c: c:a..Q)Q)EQ)Q).~(/)(j)(/)-a:::~ .5 <n c: e e 0.0:::;.:1 0 E en ~ 1l o.g c: (/) ~~~'S'5E~~'U~E~.~~~~m> ~.-= c: c: c: 0 0 o~.Q>o"Cc::J:J co 4l-e c:< <nU WWU~~~::r:U_<n~~~:::>WZ <~1D.~DD~I..DD..DID 7/7 c co - 0- Q) > .- (j) Q) ..c Q) s.... c. E o , ) -' N o N ......, C Q) s.... s.... ::::J () ro t-- It: c.. ~ . o o n-'O o rT~ n OJ CI) _0.> l~ en Q) :e Q) 0.. o ..... a... ...... () Q) :3' ::J Cf) IL, (2 C.....crol L_ c CI) 0.> o o z LJ Do € AMH >tNnCll D o C::=:=D~= n '" ~ '" 00: ~ '" U 00: uOl"" c: a. Ol '" 0 a. ~Q).!2 ~ a; ~ ~ 0 Ol .Q..s -g "'.<:: ::::> ~.~ .= ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ @ -goo: 00: ~~~ C , 'Vi 'ij) IV CD C c E ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~.2"'~c ~:g Q)<1>.... ~Q)ro co co IJ) a..~ 2:~~ ~~ ~ ~ O:~g S~~.E& ~o5 (/)c=EE~~:cOc~Q)(/)- Q)~ 0')519 c c'ii5Q)Q)EQ)Q)cnlf).~U)a::uC: .=mce eco~.~OE~~~Qc'c~ g >- Q)E 'S: '5 Q) ~ ;:: -o..c: E :0 'ij) :J -t: co 1;) > :J-~ C c: c: -g 0 0 4>.2'o:J:J"O co€ Q) c:<( muow W a....J....J::E:r:Ua..coEn.::>a::wZ ~~~O~~DD~~IDDIIDIDJ "' z.~ ~ ~ (~ ''(/ l [ 7/CC +-' C <D E -0 C <D E <( c co - a... <D > CJ) C <D ..c ) c.. E o u o N o N -0 <D CJ) o C- O L- a... .0 I'-- =t:I: c.. \:I :: o o n n~ o :J: C-B u n U) Q) 1:: Q) c.. e a.. IL, fl L~ [, O[ :J: o ....J ..... t.) Q) E ::J CI) ~ I ~D t; AMH ~Nn~1 ...---- ~ CJ C--' [ I f" D /!I?~ '" ~ z.~ ~ ~ ~.u_R :i 2" ::: c i5 a.. "'0 ;. .eo ~...; 3 ~ o ~ :J (f)~ .... t .eX g~25'~ .~ ~~>'~o.oEQ;~ ~~~~a~~~~ "'O~o~~<<300~oO ~.coO'2~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~~e~g~~~2 <(D::u.C900,WCl) '" ~ @ Vl "0 <( u" u c: a. Q) '" 0 a. i ~ .Q 3: Q) ~ .2. ~ -g '" .c :J ~ ~ .s ~ ~ ~ a.. t1: ~ "8 <( <( o Q) Q) U:~~(f) ~ Q, ~ ~ ~ E ~~~::> g ~ ~~~-g l:' .g IVQ).... ~Q)Cijco('Q -in ~Q. ~~~ ~~~~~~~~f~ ~.~ o~~ U)5=EE.!2~:ooC:~ro(f)Q) ~Q,)c O>os c cQ..Q>CIJEQ)Q).c:(f)C/')(fJtJD::Q,) ~ co :i5 .g .g Co 0 ~ :6 ~ E ~ .~ ~ ~ E fij C/') ~~E~~~~~Q)~~"'O~.g~~€~< mUCwwu~~~~u~coa..~o::~wz <~JD.~DDD~..DD..DID :=::=J ~ 11 S~) n, 18 H1L I!Tl ' I o=d~ "//'7 .r "L l q L II lJl!ji I:... ~ c co - a.. Q) > .- (J) Q) .c Q) L- a. E o ') ...) N o N +-' C Q) L- L- :J () ro co =t:t: :l. C ~ '" ~ '" <( ~ <II "C <( -g ~ ~ ~.Qa. Q5~.Q ~ Q) ~ ~ 0 " .~.~ -g ::;E::l c ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ll. Q) " "8<< o " " ~~~ c .~ as a5 ~ ]jU)(/) () a. c~~c: &;-:a .Q ~ CD ro ctI ctI "(ii :J t: CD Q) .... .gJ ~ g g c:: ~ E gj ~ili .~ '" c: ~ ~ <II c: = E E Q)'<II.:1 0 <11'- E ll. :Jl 0 c: g>g~ c c:.~~-g a5t::?<DV)"Cij (1)"0::> ~mgjii~o::;~O~~~E~~~gj '5~E > > 1? == :t-o~ e:.=.!: 1J}:i2 ~:5cn ~~.J ~ ~~ ~33~f8~~~~5~~~ " <~ 0 m~ 8 DDIJIIDDIIDIID OJ z+'" " ~-- - ----- ------ c o :;:: Ctl C Ol .en Q) o o Z c o :;:: Ctl C Ol .en Q) o o Z "/,;{o .0 co :t:t: c.. ......, c (]) E "0 C (]) E <( c co - (L (]) > -- en c (]) ..c ) c.. E o o o C\I o N "0 (]) en o c.. o L.. (L Q) C: Q) rJ) Q) a:: c: ro -e :J le>. Q) '" c: c: ~ > o~ ~ai ~~ 0'- '- ~W '" a.. 00 = -gas& ~~ ~ ll::.- '" <(~--' z.~ ~ '" '" '" ~ e '" "0 <( U "u c: a. '" '" 0 a. ~~.Q ~ '" ~ ~ 0 '" .Q..!: -g '" .c ::> ~ ~ .S ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ ~ u<(<( ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ .~SS~ .0_ a .... U) f/) -' 0 ~2-~-g .~ ~:g jQ>'- ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ E ~ ~- ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~.~.~-~~ i~~ gsc ca..Q)Q)EQ)Q).~~U)U)-~~ m c e e 0.0 ~ .2 0 E (;) :g ~ ~ .g c: en >- Q) "S; 'S; E ~ ~ "0 J: E :J 'C7.i 25 ~ en ~ > 5g~~8~~~~8~~~~&~~~ ~J 01 ~ DD~IIIDOOIIDID Q) C: Q) rJ) Q) a:: c: ro .0 .... :J gg D~ .lS HlZ ~ ~~ ~~g .lS H.lO\ 7d?/ c co - a.. Q) > -- en Q) ..c Q) L- a. E o ') -> N o N ......, C Q) L- L- ::J () ro (j) =t:/:: c.. "' z.~ ~ '" 2! '" <( 2! '" "0 <( "0 Q) u ~g.8. i~.Q :s: a; ~ ~ 0 Q) .~.~ -g ;:<;!1::J C ~ .S ~ ~ ~ a.. ~ ~ "8<(<( .Q ~ ~ u.:;:::;:: C I "Vi'US Q) Q) c: c: E .~ Q) tV (.) Q, ~~~ :a ~'- 1:'C: = = c: .-1;' "-l!: Q) > Q) ro ~ ~ ~ a: ~ E ~ ~(ij .~ "' ~ ~ -g cn-g~~ E ~'~:50~'~~~- ~~:) C':l5l9 c C:'iiiQ)Q)EQ)Q)U)cn.~(/)~oS .Sm c: e e c:O~.~O E~ ~1iiO C-C(f) ~~E'~'~~~~i~~~~~~~I~< aJU e W W [..9.9~J:()a.al.Ea.::>a::UJ,z <<~ D ~l~~ ODlllDOllDlm o ->- ()t Q) Q) .~ C. .00 ::J ..... en a.. -------~------- ~ CIl C Q) o ~ o ...J c .Q co c .Q> CIl Q) o o Z .0 CJ) =t:I: c.. ......, c 0) E -c c 0) E <( c co - a.. 0) > -- en c 0) ~ , - c.. E o o o N o N -c 0) en o c.. o L- a.. i'! " c: ~ o UJ z.~ ~ '" i'! '" <( i'! CI> -0 <( U"-o c: a. CD '" 0 a. ~~.Q ~ CD ~ ~ 0 CD .2..S: -g '" .c => ~ ~.s: ~ ~ ~ 0.. i'! i'! -0<(<( ~ ~ ~ LL~;e1J) ~ cb ~ ~ ~ E ~~~:J .~ g- ~~~-g ~ :g a;CD~ ~Q)COCQCO en ~c. a;~~ men c c ...J -'=' E c: :t::'- co .2.. C CD C ~~~~~~~~~~-~~ i~:J gSCC~Q)Q)EQ)Q).~IJ)~cnn~~ co c e e 0.0::E.~ 0 E fi) ~ .~ Q "C: c: (f) ~Q)'5'5E~~~~E~'~~~fi)co> ~~c cooo~~o~~~coQ)€C:< UoWWU~~~IU_mo..o..~=>wz ~=! 01 ~ DDIIIID~IIDID o >- t>- CD.c a. a. o ~ ~ " 0..::;; al"E -'" u c: CD ~ it: CD <(m -~ ~ Q) "~ a. .00 :J L- ena.. ~ "00 C Q) o ~ o ....J Q) ~ Q) en Q) [t: c ro .0 L- => /d3 JOe City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Memnr~ City Administrator ~,,\., ltfV FROM: Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Title 10-5 of the Farmington City Code Concerning Parks and Open Space (P/OS) and Section 10-5-21 Planned Unit Development and 10-5-22 Floodplain Overlay District DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The City of Farmington proposes to amend Title 10-5 of the Farmington City Code adding a Parks and Open Space (P/OS) zoning district and amend the numbering of Section 10-5-21 Planned Unit Development and 10- 5-22 Floodplain Overlay District. DISCUSSION During Zoning Map amendment discussions at the March 26, 2002 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission indicated a need for a Parks and Open Space zoning district to identify City Parks and natural areas on the Zoning Map. The Farmington 2020 Comprehensive Plan identifies City Park/Open Space and Natural Open Space as an approved land use. A proposed Parks and Open Space zoning district would comply with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the March 26, 2002 staff proposal to give each park and open space a zoning classification that matched the adjacent zoning district classification, such as the wetland area south of Charleswood classified as A-I to coincide with the adjacent zoning of A-I to the south of the wetland area. However, this approach was recognized as potentially misleading. For example, a natural open space that includes a wetland area may be perceived by individuals unfamiliar with the property to allow farming as a permitted use because of the A-I zoning classification, which is not the case. Therefore, the Planning Commission requested that staff prepare an amendment to the Zoning Code to provide a Parks and Open Space (P/OS) zoning district along with bulk and density standards and permitted and conditional uses specified in the code. This will allow the parks and open space areas within the City to be identified on the Zoning Map. The attached information discusses the purpose, bulk and density standards, and permitted and conditional uses proposed for the Parks and Open Space zoning district. Additionally, the numbering in Title 10-5 needs to be amended to allow for the new zoning district. Section 10-5-21 Planned Unit Development and 10-5-22 Floodplain Overlay District should be amended to 10-5-22 and 10-5-23 respectively. 7~Y ACTION REQUESTED Consider approval of the amendment to Title 10-5 of the Farmington City Code to include Parks and Open Space (P/OS) as a zoning district in Section 10-5-21 and amend the numbering in Title 10-5 to include Section 10-5-22 Planned Unit Development and 10-5-23 Floodplain Overlay District and forward the recommendation to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator "/o?5 CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10-5 OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE CONCERNING: P/OS PARKS AND OPEN SPACE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 10-5-21 ofthe Farmington City Code is amended to add the following: P/OS Parks and Open Space (A) Purpose. The P/OS Parks and Open Space District provides recreational and leisure opportunities through publicly owned land and recognize vital environmental resources including steep slopes, wetlands, and floodplains. (B) Bulk and Density Standards Lot Area No requirement Lot Width No requirement Front Yard Setback 20 feet Side Yard Setback 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Height (max.) 35 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Agriculture b. Public Parks and Playgrounds c. Golf Courses d. Public Buildings e. Public Utility Buildings f. Parking Lots 2. Conditional a. Feedlots b. Wildlife Feeding Station /~~ SECTION 2. Section 10-5-21 "Planned Unit Development Overlay" of the Farmington City Code is amended to the following: Section 10-5-22 Planned Unit Development Overlay SECTION 3. Section 10-5-22 "Floodplain Overlay District" ofthe Farmington City Code is amended to the following: Section 10-5-23 Floodplain Overlay District SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED this _day of Farmington. , 2002, by the City Council of the City of CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald Ristow, Mayor ATTEST: By: City Administrator SEAL By: City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2002. /~/ /O~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator C;,S. \('{c Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator FROM: SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Amendment - Zoning Map: Section 10-5-1 DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The City of Farmington proposes to update the Zoning Map by amending Section 10-5-1 of the City Code. The Amendment essentially accomplishes two purposes, 1) it satisfies the consistency needed between the Comprehensive Plan and land use implementation tools, namely Zoning and Subdivision Codes and 2) it addresses a number of zoning districts that have been outdated due to the approval of the new zoning code. DISCUSSION Procedurally, the Planning Commission is designated by Minnesota State Statute as the body responsible for holding public hearings for zoning ordinance amendments to both the text and map. Pursuant to M.S.S. 462.357, the public hearing notice was published in a manner consistent with the Statute. The public hearing for the Ordinance Amendment to the Zoning Map was held on March 26, 2002 and April 23, 2002 to allow affected parties to be heard concerning the zoning amendments to their individual parcel(s). The attached maps are divided into neighborhood districts similar to the districts established in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. The neighborhood district maps are divided into District 1 - North Central, District 2 - North East, District 3 - Central, District 4 - IndustriaUBusiness Park, District 5a - Downtown West, District 5b - Downtown Central, District 5c - Downtown East, and District 6 - West Rural. Each district map identifies the current zoning in the district, proposed zoning in the district, and the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for that district. Also included is an overall map showing properties affected by the zoning changes. The City is divided into zoning district boundaries shown on the Zoning Map. The permitted and conditional uses under the recently approved Zoning Code are attached in order to provide definitions of each zoning district. The zoning district classifications are: A-I Agricultural R-I Low Density Residential R-2 Low/Medium Density Residential R-3 Medium Density Residential R-4 Medium/High Density Residential R-5 High Density Residential R-T Downtown Transitional Mixed Use R-D Downtown Residential 7;(1)' Changes to this neighborhood district include the school district parcel for the middle schools and the single- family homes on Pine Street that are proposed to be amended from R-3 to R-2. The R-2 district between Division and 1st Street has been amended from R-2 to R-T. Lamperts Lumber is currently zoned B-2 and is proposed to be amended to B-3 to allow retail along with supply yards. The R-2 zone along Hickory Street has been amended to R-I to comply with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. The Dakota Electric parcel has been amended from 1-1 to B-3. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required for this parcel because the plan shows industrial. The purpose of this amendment is to lessen the intensity of the use adjacent to residential areas. The use by Dakota Electric on this property may continue in their current status under this proposed zoning change. The flood zones ofF-l and F-2 have been eliminated and are shown as overlay zones. District 5b - Downtown Central Changes to this neighborhood district include transitions between the downtown business district and existing residential areas and are reflected in the proposed R-T district. The R-D district recognizes the development patterns of the original residential areas and accommodates existing higher density single-family and two- family residential development and promotes infill of high-density single-family residential. Spruce Place and Red Oak Manor will continue to be zoned B-2. This zone allows for multi-family residential. However, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required for these parcels showing the amendment from medium- density residential to business. The Dakota Lumber parcel has been amended from 1-1 to B-1 to allow retail business and supply yards in the zone and complies with the highway business district definition. Peerless Plastics and Farmington Lanes have been amended from I-I to B-3. Both of these proposed amendments would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment because the plan currently classifies the area as industrial. The purpose of these amendments is to lessen the intensity of the uses adjacent to residential areas. The business uses may continue in their current status under these proposed zoning changes. The apartment complexes along Centennial Drive and the townhomes along Heritage Way have been amended from R-2 to R-5 to reflect the current density of the uses. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required to show this area as high density rather than medium density to comply with the zoning changes. The Tom Thumb store has been amended from B-2 to B-1 to reflect the character of the highway business use. The parcel to the east of Tom Thumb has been amended from R-3 to R-4 to allow for a more dense residential development because of the wetlands encompassing most of the parcel. District 5c - Downtown East Changes to this neighborhood district include Tamarack Ridge amended from R-3 PUD to the assigned PUD ordinance number. The homes along 209th Street that were annexed into the City will be amended from A-I to R-l to reflect the current use. The hospital parcel at the intersection of Trunk Highway 3 and 213th Street is proposed for a number of amendments. The parcel consisting of Allina Medical Clinic is amended from R-l to B-1. The clinic is an approved use in the B-1 zoning district and is compatible with surrounding zoning districts. The Trinity Hospital parcel and Trinity Terrace are amended from R-I to R-5 to allow for high-density residential in association with congregate care facilities. All of these proposed amendments will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to business and high-density residential. The parcel south of Trinity Hospital and Trinity Terrace is proposed to be amended from R-2 PUD to R-3. The Farmington Townhomes parcel at Trunk Highway 3 and Larch Street is amended from R-2 PUD to R-3 to reflect the townhome use on the parcel. The Prairie Waterway is amended from C-l to P/OS to signify the 730 park and open space use. The 2020 Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to show the annexed parcels of Devney and Rother east of the Prairie Waterway. District 6 - West Rural One change to this neighborhood district includes the elimination of the A-2 zoning district, thereby amending the zoning district on all parcels to A-I. ACTION REQUESTED Consider an Ordinance Amendment to Section 10-5-1 concerning the Zoning Map with the above changes noted. Respectfully submitted, ftt~ Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator cc: File 7.31 ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE, THE FARMINGTON ZONING ORDINANCE, ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL ZONING DISTRICT MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The zoning map of the City of Farmington established by the City Code, Section 10-5-1, is amended by deleting the existing City of Farmington Zoning Map and adopting the new Official Zoning District Map which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED this _ day of , by the City Council of the City of Farmington. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald Ristow, Mayor ATTEST: 100299 /.3~ 10-5-5: A-I AGRICULTURE /" ( (A) Purpose. The Agriculture District is intended to preserve the City's agricultural uses in order to protect farms until at least 2020, to maintain the City's small town character and to create an urban reserve for such time when there is a need for additional urban development and public utilities may be extended. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area 40 acres Lot Width 150 feet Front Yard Setback 50 feet Side Yard Setback 20 feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Height (max.) 35 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 2. Accessory Structure Standards Front Yard Setback 50 feet Side Yard Setback: 100 feet Rear Yard Setback 100 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 3. Additional Accessory Use Standards a. Feedlots, fenced runs, pens and similar intensively used facilities for animal raising and care shall not be located within three hundred feet (300') ofa neighboring property. b. Roadside stands used exclusively for the sale of locally grown agricultural products shall be permitted if: (i) They are erected at least fifty feet (50') from the nearest edge of roadway surface (ii) Parking space is provided off the road right of way i "--- "/33 (C) Uses 7 c3 Y" ''. 1. Permitted a. Agriculture b. Day Care Facilities, In-home c. Dwellings, Single Family d. Greenhouses and Nurseries, Commercial e. Public Parks and Playgrounds f. Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities g. Seasonal Produce Stands h. Specialized Animal Raising Facilities 1. Truck Gardening 2. Conditional a. Accessory Apartment b. Agricultural Services c. Cemeteries d. Churches e. Commercial and Recreational Uses f. Equipment Mainterance and Storage Facilities g. Feedlots h. Golf Courses 1. Kennels J. Mineral Extraction k. Public and Parochial Schools 1. Public Buildings and Facilities m. Public Utility Buildings n. Stables and Riding Academies o. Towers 1. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupations c. Solar Energy Systems 10-5-6: R-l LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The R -1 Low Density Residential District provides for existing and future low-density single-family development with full public utilities. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. NWllmumSWnrurr& Lot Area Single Family 10,000 square feet Two-Family --- . Townhouse --- 1Y1ulti-Family --- Other --- Lot Width 75 feet Front Yard Setback 20 feet Side Yard Setback 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Height (max.) 35 feet 1Y1aximum Lot Coverage of all 25% structures Net Dwelling; Units per Acre (max.) 3.5 * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 2. Accessory Structure SWndar& Accessory structures must be located behind principal structure in the side or rear yard according to the following requirements: 1Y1aximum size: Detached garages Lots up to 0.5 acre Lessor of 1,000 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Lots 0.5 to 1 acre Lessor of 1,250 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Lots 1.0 acre + Lessor of 1,500 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Storage 120 square feet 1Y1aximum number: 1 of each Side Yard Setback: 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Height (max.) 12 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 735 3. Minor Arterial Setbacks The minimum front yard setback for all land adjacent to minor arterial streets shall be fifty (50') feet from the planned right-of-way line. (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Agriculture b. Day Care Facilities, In-home c. Dwellings, Single Family d. Group Day. Care, 12 or less persons e. Group Home, 6 or less persons f. Public Parks and Playgrounds 2. Conditional a. Cemeteries b. Churches c. Golf Courses d. Public and Parochial Schools e. Public Buildings f. Public Utility Buildings ~o#.j' 3. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupations c. Solar Energy Systems 73~ T 10-5-7: R-2 LOWIMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The R-2 Low/Medium Density Residential District is intended as an area which incorporates older existing development as well as undeveloped land suitable for single and two family development that are served with full public utilities. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Proposed Lot Area Single Family 6,000 square feet Twinhome 5,500 square feet Two-Family 11 ,000 square feet Lot Width Single Family 60 feet Twinhome 37.5 feet Two-Family 75 feet Front Yard Setback 20 feet Side Yard Setback Single Family 6 feet Twinhome 6 feet and 0 feet Two-Family 6 feet Rear Yard Setback Single Family 6 feet Twinhome 6 feet Two-Family 6 feet Townhouse 10 feet Multi-Family 10 feet Height (max.) 35 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all structures 30% Net Dwelling Units per Acre (max.) 5.5 Single Family 6.5 Twinhome 6.5 Two-Family \, * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 2. Accessory Structure Standards 73> Accessory structures must be located behind principal structure in the side or rear yard according to the following requirements: Maximum size: Detached garages Lots up to 0.5 acre Lessor of 1,000 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Lots 0.5 to 1 acre Lessor of 1,250 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Lots 1.0 acre + Lessor of 1,500 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Storage 120 square feet Apartment 1,800 square feet Maximum 1 of each number: Side Yard 6 feet Setback: Rear Yard Setback With Alley 10 feet Without Alley 3 feet Height (max.) 12 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 3. Minor Arterial Setbacks The minimum front yard setback for all land adjacent to minor arterial streets shall be fifty (50') feet from the planned right-of-way line. Uses 1. Permitted a. Day Care Facilities, In-home b. Dwellings, Single Family' c. Dwellings, Two Family d. Dwellings, Twinhome e. Group Day Care, 12 or less persons f. Group Home, 6 or less persons g. Public Parks and Playgrounds 2. Conditional a. Accessory Apartment b. Cemeteries c. Churches d. Clinics e. Funeral Homes /3~ f. Group Homes, Commercial g. Hospitals h. Nursing Homes i. Public and Parochial Schools j. Public Buildings k. Public Utility Buildings 3. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupations c. Solar Energy Systems , ,- 73~ 10-5-8: R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The R-3 Medium Density Residential District designates areas of the City for development oftownhomes in areas with access to jobs, services, public facilities and transit and that are served with full public utilities and a residential density of more than 5.5 units per acre. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area 15,000 square feet Lot Width Townhouse 100 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet Side Yard Setback I 0 feet Rear Yard Setback 10 feet Height (max.) Two-Family and Townhouse 35 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all structures 30% Net Dwelling Units per Acre 8.5 (max. ) * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 2. Accessory Structure Standards Accessory structures must be located behind principal structure in the side or rear yard according to the following requirements: Maximum size: Detached garages Lessor of 1,000 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Storage 120 square feet Apartment 1,SOO square feet Maximum number: 1 of each Side Yard Setback: 6 feet Rear Yard Setback With Alley I 0 feet Without Allev 3 feet Height(max.) Shed 12 feet Height (max.) Garage 20 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 3. Minor Arterial Setbacks The minimum front yard setback for all land adjacent to minor arterial streets shall be fifty (50') feet from the planned right-of-way line. 7<10 (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Day Care Facilities, In-home b. Dwellings, Townhouse c. Group Day Care, 12 or less persons d. Group Home, 6 or less persons e. Public Park and Playgrounds 2. Conditional a. Group Day Care, 13 to 16 persons b. Group Home, 7 to 16 persons c. Group Homes, Commercial d. Public and Parochial Schools e. Public Buildings f. Public Utility Buildings g. Manufactured Homes 3. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupation c. Solar Energy Systems 7<.// 10-5-9: R-4 MEDIUMlHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The R-4 Medium/High Density Residential District designates areas of the City for development of multiple family dwellings in areas with access to jobs, services, public facilities and transit and that are served with full public utilities and a residential density of more than 8.5 units per acre. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards . Lot Area Townhouse 15,000 square feet Multi-I'amily 10,000 square feet Other --- Lot Width Townhouse 100 feet Multi-I'amil)' 100 feet I'ront Yard Setback 25 feet Side Yard Setback 10 feet Rear Yard Setback 10 feet Height (max.) Townhouse 35 feet Multi-I'amil)' 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all structures Townhouse 30% Multi-famil)' 30% Net Dwelling Units per Acre 12.0 (max. ) * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 2. Accessory Structure Standards Accessory structures must be located behind principal structure in the side or rear yard according to the following requirements: '/ lie:( , Maximum size: Detached garages Lessor of 1,000 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Storage 120 square feet A artment 1,800 s uare feet Maximum number: 1 of each Side Yard Setback: 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Hei t max. 12 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 3. Minor Arterial Setbacks The minimum front yard setback for all land adjacent to minor arterial streets shall be fifty (50') feet from the planned right-of-way line. (C) Uses 4. Permitted a. Day Care Facilities, In-home b. Dwellings, Multi-family c. Dwellings, Townhouse d. Group Day Care, 12 or less persons e. Group Home, 6 or less persons f. Public Park and Playgrounds 5. Conditional a. Accessory Apartment b. Churches c. Clinics d. Clubs e. Funeral Homes f. Group Day Care, 13 to 16 persons g. Group Home, 7 to 16 persons h. Group Homes, Commercial 1. Hospitals j. Nursing Homes k. Public and Parochial Schools 1. Public Buildings m. Public Utility Buildings 6. Accessory a. Accessory StnJctures b. Home Occupation c. Solar Energy Systems ;V3 10-5-10: R-5 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The R-5 High Density Residential District designates areas of the City for development of multiple family dwellings in areas with access to jobs, services, public facilities and transit and that are served with full public utilities and a residential density of more than 14 units per acre. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Proposed Lot Area 40,000 square feet Lot Width 100 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet Side Yard Setback 10 feet Rear Yard Setback 10 feet Height (max.) 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all 30% structures Net Dwelling Units per Acre 12.0+ * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 2. Accessory Structure Standards Accessory ~tructures must be located behind principal structure in the side or rear yard according to the following requirements: Maximum size: Detached garages Lessor of 1,000 s.f. or s.f. of principal use Storage 120 square feet Apartment 1,800 square feet Maximum number: 1 of each Side Yard Setback: 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Height (max.) 12 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted \ .. ~/ ?l/lI 3. Minor Arterial Setbacks The minimum front yard setback for all land adjacent to minor arterial streets shall be fifty (50') feet from the planned right-of-way line. (C) Uses 7. Permitted a. Day Care Facilities, In-home b. Dwellings, Multi-family c. Group Day Care, 12 or less persons d. Group Home, 6 or less persons e. Public Park and Playgrounds 8. Conditional a. Accessory Apartment b. Churches c. Clinics d. Clubs e. Funeral Homes f. Group Day Care, 13 to 16 persons g. Group Home, 7 to 16 persons h. Group Homes, Commercial i. Hospitals j. Nursing Homes k. Public and Parochial Schools 1. Public Buildings m. Public Utility Buildings 9. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupation c. Solar Energy Systems ,'-/& 10-5-11: R-T Downtown Transitional Mixed Use District (A) Purpose. The R- T Downtown Transitional Mixed Use District allows for a variety of compatible uses to create a transition between the Downtown Business District and existing downtown residential areas and to promote neighborhoods that are pedestrian friendly. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards .- Lot Area Single Family 6,000 square feet Twinhome 7,500 square feet Two-Family 15,000 square feet Townhouse 15,000 square feet Multi-Family 10,000 square feet Lot Width Single Family 60 feet Twinhome 37.5 feet Two-Family 75 feet Townhouse 1 00 feet Multi-Family 60 feet Front Yard Setback 20 feet Side Yard Setback 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Height (max.) 35 feet Max. Lot Coverage of all structures 35% Net Dwelling Units per Acre Twinhome 7.0 Two-Family 6.0 Townhouse 8.5 Multi -Family 14.0+ * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted . 71/0 2. Accessory Structure Standards Accessory structures must be located behind principal structure in the side or rear yard according to the following requirements: Maximum size: Detached garages Storage A artment Maximum number: Side Yard Setback: Rear Yard Setback With Alley 10 feet Without AIle 3 feet Hei t max. 12 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted Lessor of 1,000 s.f. or s.f. of principal use 120 square feet 1,800 s uare feet 1 of each 3 feet 3. Minor Arterial Setbacks The minimum front yard setback for all land adjacent to minor arterial streets shall be fifty (50') feet from the planned right-of-way line. (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Day Care Facilities, In-home b. Dwellings, Single-family c. Group Day Care, 12 or less persons d. Group Home, 6 or less persons e. Public Parks and Playgrounds 2. Conditional a. Churches b. Clinics c. Clubs d. Dwellings, Multi-family e. Dwellings, Twinhome f. pwellings, Townhouse g. Dwellings, Two-Family h. Group Day Care, 13 to 16 persons 1. Offices j. Public Buildings k. Public Utility Buildings 3. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupations c. Solar Energy Systems ,~7 10-5-12: R-D DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The R-D Downtown Residential District recognizes the development patterns of the original residential areas of Farmington adjacent to the downtown. The purpose of the RD District is to accommodates existing higher density single-family and two-family residential development and promotes infill of high-density single family residential development within the downtown area in order to strengthen the downtown, create pedestrian friendly neighborhoods, and decrease the need for automobile use. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area Minimum 6,000 square feet Maximum 14,400 square feet Single Family Two-Family Lot Width Single Family 60 feet Two-Family 75 feet Front Yard Setback 20 feet Side Yard Setback 5 feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Height (max.) 35 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of 35% all structures * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 7 C/ <(; 2. Accessory Structure Standards Accessory structures must be located behind principal structure in the side or rear yard according to the following requirements: Maximum size: Detached garages Storage A artment Maximum number: Side Yard Setback: Rear Yard Setback With Alley 10 feet Without Alle 3 feet Hei t (max. 16 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted Lessor of 1,000 s.f. or s.f. of principal use 120 square feet 1,800 s uare feet 1 of each 3 feet (C) Uses 4. Permitted a. Day Care Facilities, In-home b. Dwellings, Single-family c. Group Day Care, 12 or less persons d. Group Home, 6 or less persons e. Public Parks and Playgrounds 5. Conditional a. Churches b. Clinics c. Clubs d. Dwellings, Multi-family e. Dwellings, Twinhome f. Dwellings, Townhouse g. Dwellings, Two-Family h. Group Day Care, 13 to 16 persons i. Offices j. Public Buildings k. Public Utility Buildings 6. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupations c. Solar Energy Systems 14q 10-5-13: B-1 HIGHWAY BUSINESS DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The B-1 Highway Business District is intended to provide pockets of convenience type uses along major thoroughfares that are both pedestrian accessible from adjoining neighborhoods and automobile accessible for short trips and through traffic. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area 10,000 square feet Lot Width . 75 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet Side Yard Setback 10 feet Rear Yard Setback 10 feet Minimum side and rear yard abutting any residential District Off-street parking and access drives 10 feet Public and semi-public buildings 35 feet Recreational, entertainment, 50 feet commercial and industrial uses Height (max.) 35 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all 25% structures * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses \ / '-,~/ 1. Permitted a. Animal Clinics b. Clinics c. Clubs d. Coffee Shops e. Commercial Recreational Uses f. Convenience Store, without gas g. Health Clubs h. Hotels 1. Motels J. Offices k. Personal and Professional Services 1. Personal Health and Beauty Services m. Recreation Equipment Sales/Service/Repair 7.sCJ n. Restaurants, Class I, Traditional o. Retail Facilities p. Sexually Oriented Businesses - Accessory 2. Conditional a. Auction Houses b. Auto Repair, Minor c. Auto Sales d. Car Washes e. Convenience Store, with gas f. Child Day Care Center, commercial g. Dental Laboratories h. Grocery Stores 1. Group Day Care Centers, commercial J. Hospitals k. Nursing Homes 1. Outdoor Sales m. Public Buildings n. Public Utility Buildings o. Restaurants, Class II, Fast Food, convenience p. Restaurants, Class III, With liquor service q. Restaurants, Class IV, Non-intoxicating r. Solar Energy Systems s. Supply Yards t. Theatres u. Wholesale Businesses 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots ,6/ 10-5-14: B-2 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The B-2 Downtown Business District identifies a variety of general commercial and higher density residential uses for the downtown area in order to expand and strengthen the downtown as the primary commercial district for the City, create a pedestrian friendly downtown, and promote the City as a cultural center. Objectives of this district are to preserve historical buildings, require high design standards, and provide a diverse mix of community oriented commercial and cultural activities that are pedestrian oriented and accessible to area residents. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area 5,000 square feet Lot Width 50 feet Front Yard Setback o feet Side Yard Setback o feet Rear Yard Setback o feet Height (max.) 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all structures 100% * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Animal Clinics b. Clinics c. Clubs d. Coffee Shops e. Commercial Recreational Uses f. Commercial Services g. Neighborhood Services h. Nonprofit Recreational, Cultural and Entertainment Uses 1. Offices J. Personal and Professional Services k. Personal Health and Beauty Services 1. Public Buildings m. Recreation Equipment Sales/Service/Repair n. Restaurants, Class I, Traditional o. Retail Facilities p. Sexually Oriented Businesses - Accessory 75d 2. Conditional a. Auto Repair, Major b. Auto Repair, Minor c. Churches d. Convenience Store, with gas e. Dental Laboratories f. Funeral Homes g. Grocery Stores h. Hotels i. Motels j. Multiple-family dwellings k. Outdoor Sales 1. Public Utility Buildings m. Restaurants, Class II, Fast Food, convenience n. Restaurants, Class III, With liquor service o. Restaurants, Class IV, Non-intoxicating p. Solar Energy Systems q. Theatres 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots 763 10-5-15: B-3 HEAVY BUSINESS DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The B-3 Heavy Business District is a transitional district designed to provide space for certain existing commercial and industrial uses which are compatible together but are more intense and therefore incompatible with uses identified in the B-1, B-2 and B-D districts. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area . -5,000.sQuare feet Lot Width 50 feet' Front Yard Setback o feet Side Yard Setback 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Minimum side and rear yard abutting any residential District Off-street parking and access drives 1 0 feet Public and semi-public buildings 35 feet Recreational, entertainment, commercial 50 feet and industrial uses Height (max.) 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all structures 35% * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Animal Clinics b. Auto Repair, Minor c. Auto Sales d. Commercial Services e. Convenience Store without gas f. Mechanical Sales, Service and Repair g. Offices h. Public Buildings i. Restaurants, Class I, Traditional j. Retail Facilities, greater than 3000 sf k. Supply Yards 1. Truck Terminals m. Wholesale Businesses n. Sexually Oriented Businesses - Accessory 7.5</ 2. Conditional a. Auto Repair, Major b. Car Washes c. Convenience Store with gas d. Group Day Care Center, Commercial e. Home and Trailer Sales/Display f. Manufacturing Facilities g. Mini-storage Units h. Outdoor Sales 1. Petroleum Bulk Storage J. Public Utility Buildings k. Solar Energy Systems 1. Nurseries 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots ~bS 10-5-16: B-4 LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The B-4 Limited Business District is intended to provide a setting for low to medium density housing combined with complementary and supporting business land uses that serve a neighborhood and are developed and operated in harmony with the residential characteristics of a neighborhood. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area 5,000 square feet Lot Width 50 feet Front Yard Setback 20 feet Side Yard Setback 6 feet Rear Yard Setback 6 feet Minimum side and rear yard abutting any residential District Off-street parking and access drives 10 feet Public and semi-public buildings 35 feet Recreational, entertainment, 50 feet commercial and industrial uses Height (max.) 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all structures 35% * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Neighborhood Services b. Nonprofit Recreational, Cultural and Entertainment Uses c. Offices d. Personal and Professional Services, less than 3000 sf e. Personal Health and Beauty Services, less than 3000 sf f. Dental Laboratories 2. Conditional a. Animal Clinics b. Churches c. Clinics d. Child Day Care Facilities, Commercial 7 s'c, e. Dwellings, Multi-Family f. Funeral Homes g. Health Clubs h. Light Manufacturing Facilities i. Personal and Professional Services, greater than 3000 sf J. Personal Health and Beauty Services, greater than 3000 sf k. Public and Parochial Schools 1. Public Utility Buildings 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots ")57 10-5-20: 1-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The 1-1 Industrial District allows for the continuation of existing industrial uses but not their expansion in the downtown area. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area 20,000 square feet Lot Width 75 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet Side Yard Setback 15 feet Rear Yard Setback 15 feet Minimum side and rear yard abutting any residential District Off-street parking and access drives 10 feet Public and semi-public buildings 35 feet Recreational, entertainment, 50 feet commercial and industrial uses Height (max.) 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all 35% structures * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Auto Repair, Major b. Light Manufacturing Facilities c. Mini-Storage Units d. Offices e. Research Facilities f. Supply Yards g. Truck Terminal h. Warehousing Facilities 1. Sexually Oriented Businesses 2. Conditional a. Agriculture b. Commercial Recreational Uses c. Food Processing Facilities 7~ 7~q d. Manufacturing Facilities e. Public Utility Buildings f. Recycling Facilities g. Solar Energy Systems h. Towers 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots 4. Interim a. Mineral Extraction - ". - .-. ',,-. --.-~ ":,- .-.-:.-. -...-.-..-~~ .~.~ ~. ~,"?'..." . . .--..........-"" ,-'. .,- ..- 10-5-19: IP INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (A) Purpose. The IP Industrial Park District allows for existing industrial uses within the City and promotes high quality architectural, landscaping and site plan development standards for new industrial development in order to increase the City's tax base and provide employment opportunities. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area 40,000 square feet . Lot Width 150 feet Front Yard Setback 50 feet Side Yard Setback 25 feet Rear Yard Setback 25 feet Minimum side and rear yard abutting any residential District Off-street parking and access drives 10 feet Public and semi-public buildings 35 feet Recreational, entertainment, 50 feet commercial and industrial uses Height (max.) 45 feet Maximum Lot Coverage of all 35% structures * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Light Manufacturing Facilities b. Office Showroom c. Office Warehouse d. Research Facilities e. Warehousing Facilities 2. Conditional a. Child Day Care Facilities, Commercial b. Manufacturing Facilities c. Public Utility Buildings 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots 4. Interim a. Mineral Extraction 7~O 10-5-18: BP BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT (A) Purpose: The Farmington Business Park district is primarily designated for office and business park developments that will provide a broader range of employment opportunities than is currently available in Farmington. Business and office uses are envisioned to draw people from the surrounding area and introduce higher concentrations of employment. The Business Park will .develop at higher building and site design standards than other industrial and industrial park districts in Farmington. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. Lot Area 2 acres . Lot Width 300 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet Side Yard Setback 30 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet Height (max.) 40 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Health Clubs b. Hotels c. Offices d. Research Laboratories e. Restaurants, Class I, Traditional f. Restaurants, Class III, with liquor service g. Warehousing Facilities 2. Conditional a. Dental Laboratories b. Public Utility Buildings 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots 4. Interim a. Mineral Extraction 7~1 10-5-17: SSC SPRUCE STREET COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (A) Purpose: The Spruce Street Commercial District is primarily designated for commercial retail sales and services. This district is not intended to compete with the businesses in the Central Business District, rather provide a location for those businesses that have space needs that are larger than can be accommodated in the downtown or would be a disruption to existing development patterns. Development in this district will provide design elements and building and site relationships that emulate traditional mainstreet form to create a walkable pedestrian friendly environment with connections to surrounding areas. The relationship of the Spruce Street Commercial district to C.S.A.H. 50, future residential development, and the Central Business District will require a greater sensitivity to design with higher quality standards in order to develop a pleasant, attractive and aesthetically pleasing environment. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. Lot Area 1 acre Lot Width 100 feet Front Yard Setback 50% of the building front shall be within 20 feet of the public right-of- way or private street edge Side Yard Setback No requirement Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Height (max.) 40 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Child Day Care Center, commercial b. Commercial Recreation c. Health Clubs d. Restaurants, Class I, Traditional e. Restaurants, Class ITI, with liquor service f. Retail sales and services 2. Conditional a. Convenience Stores, with gas b. Grocery Stores c. Hotels and Motels d. Public Utility Buildings e. Restaurants, Class IT, fast food, convenience f. Theaters 7t::,c:? 7(;3 3. Accessory a. Parking Lots 4. Interim a. Mineral Extraction ) ,;;,--". I ./ JACK A. BENEDICT & ASSOC. INC. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS-BUILDERS-BROKER ........................................................................................................................................... P.O. Box #107 Elysian. MN 56028 May 1,2002 To: Mayor Jerry Ristow & Farmington City Council It has come to our attention that the City Planning Commision has recommended the re-zoning of our 5 acre parcel at the intersection of20Sth Street and Akin Road from R-3 to R-l. We feel this to be arbitrary, capricious, and without merit. Since 1996 when both Planning Commision & Council approved a preliminary plat for multi- family development:. (66 townhouses in Riverside Estates) and also in the year 2000, when we purchased the 5 acre parcel, there has been no indication that multi-family was not the best use of this land. In filct, city staffhas allowed us to spend over $15,000.00 in surveying and architectural plans to develop this parcel for multi-family use. This parcel is extremely unique because the building site totals I acre of the 5 acres. We understand and have understood all along that there are easements that may restrict potential site plans. One reason the property has not been developed has been the city's reluctance to settle a sewer easement problem that still exists. Since we wish to develop the property to its highest and best use, (current zoning R-3, maximum of60 units) we will make this proposition: . A) The City code calls for no more than 3.5 homes per acre in R-I. We propose to cluster and build 18 units on the 1 acre building site. Or . B) We strongly feel propositon A is the highest and best use of the property, however, if propositon A is not acceptable. we request R-2 zoning since the building site is restricted. Sincerely, J A.~dZ J ~'Z~s Lt;- oan J. Budenskl /~3CL. SPRINGBROOK CORPORATION = - '===-'-=-"":==.~::=:' REAL EST ATE DE VELOPMENT AND MA RK ETI NG , . May 1, 2002 Mr. Jack Benedict P. O. Box 24536 Apple Valley, MN 55124 Dear Jack: You asked that we review our m:ords and indicate when the attached letter was written. We met you and Brian to discuss the Farmington parcel on August 8, 2001. We talked to city staff that same week and drew our conclusions fairly quickly. Our best guess is that the letter was written on approximately August 14,2001. SiDcerel)', SPRINOBROOK CORPORATION ~ Thomas H. Murray 10640 L YNOALE AVENUE SOUTH, 9'Z.S81-1800 SUITE 6, BLOOMINGTON. MN 55420 = FAX 952-884-8766 7~36 SPHIN(~.BI{()()I( CORPOI~ArrI()N .__.~._'_____.m_"_'" ~ ...n."" "_'_._n_"__..n._.._._._'~__~___"'_____~_.__'___'_'__'___,_'___'___ .-- --....-----. .<_. _..n ...._._...._.. _"....n ._.._....__.._ .._., . ,,-~-,-"-----'-" '. -~"'----"'-'--_._---'-'-'- H F 1\ I E ~, TAT E J) EVE LOP MEN TAN 1) MAR K E TIN G Mr. Jack Benedict 180R9 Judicial Way South Lakeville. f'"IN 55044 Dear .lack. We have decided to pass on your Farmington parcel. The Planning department was less than encouraging about the prospects of developing the piece considering setbacks, power lines. gas easement and potential neighborhood opposition. We enjoyed meeting you and Brian and appreciate the time YOll spent with liS the other day. Sincerely, SPRrNGBROOK CORPORATION ~~tf1e, Howard Ky~1 IO(,If\ !VNP/\IY AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 6, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 nc; , Wq p'l~l FAX 952-R84-8766 /~..3~ Neighborhood Planning Districts City of Farmington .~ffiIlIIIE :D L 1- .G \ , ~ =:J ~ ~i ) ,J ~~ iet 2 ~ ortl1 East '" ~ ) I , t u n I } P= ) i/ , it ~ ) d L., c ruJL~o~ ~ -J ~ ~ l r ~ - -I-' ~l Lll [ (')J\ n.h ~1st-r-<<>t . [ istrie l:J J Centr~1 I~ L ~~ :::n:? ~ ~st R o '" ~~ - F~~ ~ \1"'.); T\ ~ ~ ~ .- ---- tIi!Ili\lIl I LJ ~ r!/ I r ~ ~ ~ I...L ~ ~r- A ~ I I. = -- -J AiiIIrt"~ ~U rF Indu ,y~ai' J / II ~~L --! ss Park ~ I -=1 s= l~tlffiffi\l1 f-J U ' 11ll~ I I r - I!!l!Itl IllB 1 fi t:> ~. ~ggll:,!l t - 4'V~ I mHl IlIllillll~ I I ~ ? ~ ~J~im I~I 1::1D " U flU I ~-r Q) Ira I 1 Legend I~I ~ h~r I · N I 1 II"' / City Boundary \ , / v MUSA Boundary Cl Neighborhood Planning Districts w.' 0.5 , Scale o 0.5 s 1 Miles , I'<<JTE: THIS MAP IS FOR PlANN1NQ PURPOSES ONlY AM) SHOlA-D NOT BE USEDFOR EXACT MEASUREMENTS City 01 F~ Planning DMaion. 2fW "/C7 c.j Proposed Zoning Districts District 1 - North Central I -..--.-..--.----..~:~.I,I~I,I : Ii....... UlU'IIIIIIIi1,11 r 11111111111 FI"~~ 8~/ "' :"'II~~~ ...... :~J 11111111' ~~ '" '''" EEHHfE1j~.; /^-<8IHHE 8R>~EffiEmE ....."', v -.---c~ '~' II ~ , - , .+--~r= e- \ I I I II II ] .'," I II H H I \ II II II "1 , ~ ~L2 "FI'::r I C0- EHffiHHB J I I t= r- I ~y ~: = QI.' ;)i rT I i=== ~ -' uo'" - _ I I V'--! 8 I ~.?" ~ "'98;41 -" =t v I ~ .r"- iJ -: I IT">... VI -\y . ! , ,ur-- .--- \.' >-8-~^~ ~ f8 ~ .~~ m' /"'/ ~;z:: ~~ =E8~1 ~ 'I' ~ ~rl~~~ ,=t.~~. v I \ ~"i:.. v- ~~~'~ j _ I ~ '\\ ~'\TIT " Z;~. .,;: A 't=:;o:t: 1= ~ I r ~~)-~ : ~ : fZ 7J? fE ~~~ ~ UlllillH\~~~~ -{ J I OJW!f!fjj ~ t=~~~A ;:;/;../ JJaooml~ ~.\;)::: \ ~ (:\~~VA ~ " t-rr.\ v __ < \~' 1\"- '/\:X< ~ I" lilt- \ (:'YKl: r ~ I I rT mli IT Y Ii '"" v A'\ \.. \,\ II JIIIIII Q:.1 I lill ~ ~~ y~~ , \ R-1 I ;, ~ J~\'r,'< ~\ \:=Wil'0 \ -1_ 1.....\ I--' r-r '-...... ''''-A.'J::.{1 ~ ~ \)\ ~j ~ (~~r.c=(g~~+ .f1 III m~ ~ I J r ~ /." al \'H:jH-:JRIT1T TIT7J1L "J ~ /, 1 ~ H I-J:J . ! aLl tr-: ~ \ 'v'1J-l1 /'A \ ,I ~1;.~-SU-j.IIl->-- ,r- +-~, Il!n~ II' 8-,-,"7 ~~ \ I f-.-;:-u.D~ 1=1 ~ ' 1\ \-\l-C t= ~ ) \~ ~~E ~: R-1 ~~~ E , /.) t:~)= i Ij,~ h ;' ____..~ I T'D.I ':.~ i /~ '1111 OU. I I __, I ' i' I i ,..--1' I," ~;>(----- r !-"'\ I 1-' ; I! i r-1 '-- . ; , ..... \---'---I~J?:</~\~;}!~\~~i/~:~>:' 1\" '< , , >\::>. { -, , I , \ \ \ PUD \ , Ord. #001-459, I \ I \ R~3 \ \ \-., 1 I . J ... \ , , \ I R-1 ,~ New Zoning Districts . A-1 lAgriCulture) t B-1 Limited Business) B-2loowntown Business) B-3 Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) IP (Industrial Park) 1-' (light Industrial) Spruce Street Cooridor BP (Business Park) R-1 (Low Density Residential) R-2 (low/Medium Density Residential) R.3lMedium Density Residential) ".-!/, R-4 Medium/High Density Residential) R.5 (High Density Re5:i~ential) R- T (Downtown transItIonal) RD (Downtown Residential) Water ROW (Right-of-Way) Township 1~'City Boundary ~NeighborhOOd Boundary FIOOd'Nay Overlay District PUD District City of Farmington Planning Division Nole: This is a draft zoning map of lhe recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed land uses wilhin lhe 2020 Comprehensive Plan. 0.1 , o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles , Scale 1000 , o 1000 2000 Feet /~s Sou"ce:F.mingtonPlamoogO";'ion.Oakol.eo....lys...veying&l.ndlnlormBlionOepettmoonl. C:\GiaPrqecta\l~rorOogmapepr Current Zon. . District 1 Nln9 Districts ,_________ - orth Central t~"TTnTTiiTi---- - I~ -<;~~j:ilmmU. II ~1J1.jjtiiij;;j;--- ,--,."" _ _-,l>illl. ...1 --- ~ A .....;;;;.--- - 111 ~~ ~ ' lIII / ---------- I ~ ~ ill Tn II ---,. ~~'SSJ:I 'TI}]IIII ~i l hT1T~mfflll ' I t:\ pc1 tl'.)/A \- )'t:J' ';::;::;::;:' ~ I , \! LJ::Jt!=iw'-}.'(/\ \1"~ f\~ -- (j F~ ;~~ ~\\!~WW UIIi= ~ '~0?"1~ LJ~-;'\ ~~. ,,: I~ F-3 \ i -1 \,\ ,,\lXv'" ,1:;) I Pu (J, - ~);l'j r R-2 J ~, " :: ,_~~ PUD ' = ~~~ ~~~w ' ) ? ~ ~: I rnm[?, ;-\?i,?\fU I _ ,/ 0:::: ll}'iHTll EE!& 'Q.:; ,,~' EI I A-1 ~@ffi d~ \2' ~~~~ ,~ R-1 ,I ~ Ht: \; :;- 1\ ~ "A'V"'RI ' I \ 1 -II T1 "~\ 'V,cJ.; lil,'~l ~ ~/~41 i ~_ ~ '< ""v\I ' \ 1~-ffil1tE\j€ 0':;"7 ~]J~IT ~N1r1';Iy;~"0 ' j "!;N cI H '- r en / 0.>, '3 ~ '\;\\.11 WT F-3 OO~.d St /{ Il,~bt 'I--+.. 1<'1 L 7\ ~ ~0 IllTl ;' cf ~;N/[IIJ1-'Y'tH/ >=1H:Jc-i J vUI T Q?fPI0-" \ ~ (=H ( t:.-\' I ~;-;< ~ I - M0 ffil \ \ p.,',- rt! 1m '83?---- cJ rr I,tW' ~ ~ ((: dlf-lI~ffiiu ,\\'n~IJlJtitv:i~ I _ > '/ t VI.--' , ~ c-- \:: L Pt=: ~ __ ~ (--=I \:: R-1 >-- 1-\1.1''' c 1= L t' >-- C __ Ie ~~ \-R:ylJ::1 to'" ~ I II~"~ Current Zo . . d Districts o A-1 (~'ng Districts . A-2 gncullure) D R-1 (Agncullure Preserv D R-2 (~OWDensity) e) D R-3 (Hiedlum Density) Ii!!I R-4 (( 9h DenSity) r.--l Mixed Cod "----' PUD (Planned Jl. .D B-1 (Limiled Bu nit Development) B-2 (Gen smess) . B-3 (Hea~ral Business) ~ B-4 (N' Y Busmess) . _ . elghborhood . ~:1(Li9ht Industrial)commercial) _ F (Conservalion) D -1 (Floodway) D ~:2 (Flood Fringe) .---. 3 (General FI L-J Water ood Plain) - ~ L- r - ~ City of Farmington ~ annlng Division l ---"- I Note: This is a ;-- ========== adopted Zonin aft zonmg ma of uses within th 9 Code fOllowin;th the recently e 2020 Compreh e proposed land enSlve Plan. 1000 Scale , 0 1000 2000 0.1 0 Feet , 0.1 0.2 , 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles . ",",u.F."""",~".......""""",,.Oo'..eo.nyS "7c; c:;; l.-y>ng&lendlnlof......hOn~ a.('t') ca . ~('t') - ca L.. ...... c: ~Q) ......u (.) .- .c .=~ .~ 0 cz c cu 0.... Q) (f) => "C C cu .....J o N o N '" '" ~ -0 <{ ~ -0 1i3 ~ ~ ~.<: ~ ~ > o u " "(ij" ~ -g ~.Q:::> .S ~ c ~ ~.~ -g .S: ~ .Q ~ 3 LL~O co 'E a,C"'~~ .~~ ~~Q) .~ ~ c: In ~ In ~ (/)0. g. ~ C"' ~ c: ~ :J "cf),,- a=i >- .a a; a. ro~6~-gQ) o~ ~C:>~ 1:'-0 Q) CD ~ '" c: -l!'Cl:: '" tl."" c: ~ g(/) c: c:..J ~ &:.~g a=i~'EOo ~ co~~~Q)Q)In-f/)f/)'-OcQ)~~O gm5~~~~f/).~lniiEQ)(/)~~- m~i~-gi~.~~~c~~~~~E~~ ~~~.Q.Q~~~-g~~~~~~~~~o O~oLLLL~:Jm_m..J..J~I~u~Z~ ~~ D'~"' !DIIDDDIJIDIIDD o o '" OJ " u.. o o '" o o o "C C Q) 0> Q) .....J .._'.... ..,..... f ..~ ". ;,. ,< UJ z*~ ::: Q) CU 0 () g C/) i::? ffi ~ a: ~ ::; ~ a: e 8 '" " w '" o "/c; 7 ""0 C Q) 0> Q) --I '" '" Q) -g 4: '" -c ~ ~ & ~.<:~ .Q. -g ~ "'o.U ~~:3 ~ ~ .S c.. 0 1:- g ~ ~ _.~ :J u.-~d5 ~ c ~~"O~ C>. CD\!) ..~ ~~ ~~ ~EQ) ~~5:;: "(iiC ~~~ti ~~ a3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c3 ~ :J c: ~ U) c: "0 :J ~ C C --.J Q) ~ >- E c: >-~ &~ c: Q 5.g'iii ~ ~ gi ifl "'_ '" ~.:!~'~ EOu ~~ .gc~c..c..~~ifl~ifliiEi~~SOg U)<D"O"Oc:C:c:~co~:Jo~ro.o~~ ~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~ u~o~~~~roc:~oo~.~:J~<D~OO .....="~D"' EDI- ...J...J J:c..U~zz~ <.<.wTI ~. 8 i .IDDO[]IDIIUJlS10 a; " u. o o o N Q.U') ns . ~M (If) I ...., - (.) ca .- L. L. ...., I ""'c fA .- Q) CO I I I c co a.. Q) (f) ::> ""0 c co --I o N o N o o o I.LI z*~ ;:: Q) co o Cf) 0 ~ '" C)b~ zz::; zoUJ z~.. :I"" o.l?~ ~~~ ~z"" ~~~ ~"iUJ ::;0" ~~~ ':":OUJ UJo.'" ......" O"UJ 2:0.<1> o o o 7 (;; c:zr- , ) I ) r ~! Current Zoning Districts District 3 - Central ~ ~~ ~H ~ ~~~~~ v~, ~ ~?ffj) ~ if~9 f-- ~ 11/ \\ A~~ JI~.:~~L~_ w~ L -1111111111111 u~ -! '- \\ K-' !l'~ : R-1 ~ F-3 ~~il U ~ , (nJ fllfW\ 1\ ~~ ( -,." ~ --':l , ,'</-... \\\ \ lb~,~ ~~~ ~ ~ lJ \~~ ~ ~ nW '\.. "-.&!- tJ I ''PI ---\:: ItOB """,'1(?r F 3 '\ ,0 '----r\ ~ B ~C}y W/t CJ rv n \ ITT I RI . n; hnnnl LJ -)\ I I I ..----- ~ ,\ 1\ A-1 IJDY '\ o q Ir/QJ -------1- I A-1 I I 1~1 ~ I \ ~~[I;R~I;III'11 If ~ 'j F-3~~~ I I 11_ uUj ~; '--- L F-3 R-1 ~~ I-- f- - - , M ,un ff r-;=- 0 " /( f- Ull II~II~ III I I IJV Lr--r ~ - - l ~"A U .nn IlD - I -L /\/ City Boundary C Neighborhood Districts Current Zoning Districts A-l (Agriculture) A~2 (Agriculture Preserve) R-1 (Low Density) R~2 (Medium Density) R-3 (High Density) R-4 (Mixed Code) PUD (Planned Unit Developmenl) B-1 (Umited Business) B-2 (General Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) 1-1 (Ught Industrial) C-1 (Conservation) F-l (Floodway) F-2 (Flood Fringe) F-3 (General Flood Plain) Water Nole: This is a drafl zoning map of lhe recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed land uses within lhe 2020 Comprehensive Plan, City of Farmington Planning Division 1000 Scale N 0 1000 2000 Feet w.' 0 0.25 0.5 Miles , S 0.25 , Sou'ce:f.....-ngton~D....t"'on.O'kol.CoosocyS..-ying&landlnlonrallonOep.1rnenl. "/C.9 Proposed Zoning Districts District 3 - Central ~QO_: ~-r~ /- :--f .,r" :~~:!; ~ '-~F>~:~ ~~-~~~-<~~;~::~~~-.T~IJl~~r.;:~,~~::1 ~ _,' ,-J ",f: - ,T,,' LJ \'"., ~,~,..,', /;,' In'''lTI-.,., -1'_ i f'-' j---i\___. :'-j'C,i! r<,!,'::"7,i:),_.(..."-\.,.\\-.::~,~:..:",~,,~v \~__dLIr}'''~,>--'l.'':,,'' 'i~4 .).-'-.' '-/""'-1" J....-lt \\ ~-~-i\ Ii" r..-./;....J.......... I-..j...:. >---j1r"\ ~" ,....".,.. '\--\ ........-.fTT'> L.../ ,~? ;):l:-}\.-.t-:(~l )~CS/::;':7F11 t~~:':L-::~'J{} i\~.:l\}l~;~-~,f~;:.~ ~~;)i,~~>~;tt' , :It--/r:..!:l j/:; 1..<],-.~11 '- :::i':r~/ JI P~\/A-'-\'~;'..j::'j '\~; t:I-1I'r1ll '.;;"~'::\('/"') /' it?;:} D:'~:::;~;/'" I ~~-=~rr.:!; IT\-;'t;~H:~~'~-L___bO_L':-L-~;~:L.i-..:_!'r"-r\'\/- .... \<."'v : / ....\.../0\..-1...:.. ~ ,\ ~I.J..-.l'-= I -.IL0\J-......--:-r;Tlrr \A,'-1 -.,.....-----'"(-\\....>\')-~--_.~' ~~: -n\'-<~ -i _'. ~~\i~.\=.,3~ 'r; "'-T;-1'\\\ \ \ ~ \\\ B'~2Z/?:.;-"~J-\~~'~:r::; :' r' '....' \. v, 1t ~ J ---I ....\'1. ...."-.jl ~- ..J.---.L...:...l__.W_L;_' _\It.~~_J._-<,' r -~ -l r--jt:,..-- \~ , r; r ::.J_:~~ \:~ t; t ~I -~,~ , ?f ~ /:',;?;,: : 1 t 1~~'~ ~ ~.:)~i4 ~ E~ ~~ ~-; ~ : I-w->, V\,~y'f.,;:-II)'-:,_,>:_~ '8b[.,'(1-'I=i t::::Ir::~ --'---' f:-~ ~::~-J" v . . '..,. .. r 1 L~' ,/ "-.:.. \ I- I t-j;v ,:....--1 t::l ~:.:i ~ - ...-~ r- r-,'- 1>.,."", / JJ-::r.- ~ -/ j)'" ,..r. r-l ,_ ~- , \. r. 5~~-. 1--1 rr11 H~-l ~>:-:-~~{~'::\Cf5~\~:~:~~iT~':!!. _J '~)':)~~<~~;::'-~___~~:"~~: ~ _ '\"'----r \\ I \ \ II \'\ \\ ~\ '1\\ , \ \ l 'I' , \ \ \ \ \: .... \ , ", ) R-\ - I \ I ( \ -\ I A-1 1________ \ 1\ i' I '\ , , I I ...,----.-----....r- 1 I I ! i L____ , , I ....-- i..... , '- -/( ~-~- A-1 ' =-----j -------- i \ ..... , .. , , ~ \\ \, ---\.,'"--- . f' -, ., I r \ "' i r '" J "'---1---:" .... , 1.11 I: !" r 1- " : f i -~"";";;- :;:=1 l - - .".; _.1 L--- _ __ - -----l=.:ib:~=-=-,; - LL J. ( .... - i I! , 5 " J I [/'1-: -~ \ -, il l__..; -~ '/ '\ ! ;---1 r----r-----r--\~~-=~li:~~~ [-l, 'I Ii' ... ' ,,:::J:j~,~,:=~=~=~~::1__::,_,l::::_~~"-f~.:~AH.:.~~~1~~;w...::=::-i -- ,..- - .... - , I if , .- / J.", .' /-.. , .."-,,. .-::~>/ "f---. Ii ,,/ ~--- ~ L___'::\._____m______,..__~'----n- I ' "J I ',: j ./1 //1 h /1 ..-------~': 1 // .. (1 ;v;.;.! "I ,-I 111/ ..,!!'Y/:_'Lo I, l ,'---"-! ,- "11 I[/-j L_ __,;7 _nJ-J'):;d\ll..J t:J ;'----~::':---'-:2:rl.::::1!;'" "-1 h 1-' ",'.:' Tr';91-~ hrn--] '!-1 n, ":::tt'JlI~~llH '[~Til! !:;'lE I, ff' f.-,lliJHj~- ,..L>j ! t". I ____J """f"l._, ,. JJ, I" Tf !II.~. I New Zoning Districts A.1 (Agriculture) 6--1 (Limited Business) B.2 (Downtown Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) IP (Industrial Park) 1-1 (Light Industrial) Spruce Street Cooridor BP (Business Park) R.1 (Low Density Resid~ntial) R-2 (Low/Medium DenSIty Residential) R-3 (Medium Density Residential) .J. I R-4 (Medium/High Density Residential) R-5 (High Density Residential) R-T (Downtown transitional) RD (Downtown Residential) Water ROW (R9ht-of-Way) ~. City Boundary NeighbOrhood Boundary IFIOOdYI.ay Overlay District PUD DIstrict City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of the recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. s Scale 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet , 0.1 0 0,1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles ~- , N w+, S'O"...'FanninglOnPa.nningl:>oMion.Dal<oI.~Survey>ng&l..-.dlnfomwllOf>o..p.~. C:\G..ProjecI8\lorong'.norw~8P' /76 Q.(O co " ~M ~ "- co -.0.. ~(ijt/) .... -i: t/) (.) .... Q) -- t/) C ~ ~ "Ci) __ w ~ c.Em c co 0... Q) (f) :J -0 C co --l o N o N '" '" ~ -g <l: .!l! u - '" ., ~~~ ~ <l: ., .2.. ~ ~ "'a." ~~5 ~ a;'S -0 c.. 0 <:- c "'0 c ro Q) ~~~ 0> u.~S ~ c Q) ~~"O:G C>. /1) a> --l ..~~VJ ~:~ ~EQJ ~~~;~ .~c u~~o :>,rocoQ:l"OQ) Q)a.>>. :Ecn~[ ~.-g ~ CO ~ ~ ~ ~ n:: 0 ~ ::J C > (/J C -o:J c c....JQ) ro>-EC>.a..~OQ)c.Q c:o~'(ij'-Q)VJ O-~:J(l)~'EO <D<<; :Jtt)Cij a: ~ .~~ tn(ij II) ~:oO ~ <1>32"'0 a.c ~<'E a.. f/) ~'C: ~ <L> Q) E <DCf) \...20.2> ~~~I~ii~~~O~~~~~~~1 u:::;: c: _ .Q " ~ :J U " ~ ~ al 0).0 >- '" .a 0 :;: '-:o...g u. ~ 5.:::> aL~ m ...J.3:::;: I ~ c3 &! ~ ~ ~ ~~D~I~i8DIIDDD~IDII~~D o o '" Q; " u. o o o w (I) :!? ob~ zZ:> zoUJ z~<< <"" d~ <<"'W 00:> u.zt; ~~~ <z :>0<< ~~~ ,:":ow wo.'" ...<<" !f~~ o o '" z+~ ~ Q) CO U (f) o '77/ Current Zoning Districts District 4 - Industrial/Business Park 1'\/ City Boundary C Neighborhoods Current Zoning Districls CJ A-1 (Agriculture) _ A-2 (Agricullure Preserve) B R-1 (Low Density) . : R-2 (Medium Density) R-3 (High Densily) MI R-4 (Mixed Code) D PUD (Planned Unil Developmenl) D B-1 (Limited Business) _ B-2 (General Business) _ B-3 (Heavy Business) f2ZI B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) _ 1-1 (Lighllndustrial) _ C-' (Conservation) IIilii!lI F-' (Floodway) B F-2 (Flood Fringe) . .' F-3 (General Flood Plain) ... Water City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of the recently adopted Zoning Code following lhe proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Scale N 750 0 750 1500 Feet w*, , 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Miles , S s.:uc.:Fwminglonf'lenNng()Maion.o..kol.eo..>fyS...-..ylnll&l.nd~bOn~ 7/~ r- I ~F z-- .~ i , I h /(1 ' tu 1 i---- 11-1 _I--.J I I t'<", ""'>' I ""L L ~ I r.:= ,-- "",$)~, '" {r~ r--"::"'vt''::.."':.;:,7' '1 v.i, '''',';';;; ',~' r-/;, I \ ,I_'n'~ R-1 J I I ,<t:, ,I' .." I ::.::' )[~,J ' I /~' <!-~(\J I I ... ~ ~/ /' ~--- ~/ 0 :1 )' I f I I fib 'E(: /;J I ~~ )J I I , .\ J'I i , I I H '+,',-1- I ! F' rT'-----" I 'J I i __l__________--'_....o=~~c=o-L=_~~=~===~~=====~!. ~...... .c~_J~_Lk"'_,~ -I, \/ II 0/ , )------.- =f -..+------ - - -- . __n ~ ir'-- n r~-l r' _LI II r~--" I '----'! , ' I ' , I __________J I I ! rk -_.--- i I -,' '" mr I.__n__'n ___ I I ,. - -,,"" """', New Zoning Districts A,1 (Agriculture) ; B-1 (Limited Business) B-2 (Do\Mltown Business) 8.3 (Heavy Business) 8-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) IP (Industrial Park) 1-1 (Light Industrial) Spruce Street Cooridor BP (Business Park) R-l (Low Density Residential) R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential) R-3 (Medium Density Residential) ':,ic R-4 (Medium/High Density Residential) .. ~:~ ~~~::n~;~i~r~~~~?Oe~:I)I) RD (DO'M1to'M1 Residential) Water ROW (Right-of,Way) ,"v' City Boundary ~ Neighborhood Boundary IFloocrway Ove~ay District PUD District Proposed Zoning Districts District 4 - Industrial/Business Park \ \ ~~t~:j ['j! =, I [j r: r J _n_____ --- I '\ ~ \" '\, ,:/ -- ~~)..~<~:;>~.<.~.1~ I "; " \ i \..<, I I :. !. 'x_*_ ~\,-/ I I ---'S~,----,------------j'-r "\:\ I i ;/:\, I II "" ;;~- I I .:. >)"'~~\ I I /~\\ 1J ,'" \ \\--- ! \\ ! I \\\ r-- '\..{"-' \\\ ! "'...-"" ,,' \\\ : \"\ --;;~~~~\r~~/ -' - \,' II -. .1\ \_-- ' , r\ \ ,\ \ : \ \ . i ~ --, 1-1 - I \ I , '\ I I ~, \' 1-1 \ \ \\ I , - "' - .oJ ",,'" 1-1 ",,"" , ~ - .... .... i, - Ii -I I , I --- City of Farmington Planning Division Nole: This is a draft zoning map of lhe recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Scale 1000 , o 1000 2000 Feet 0,2 , o 0,2 OA Miles ~~.farrninglon""'rnog~.o..kolBeo...IySurveying&l.,..tlnlorm8toonOep..1ment C\G;.Pro;ecno\Z~zonorynoop."P' 7 -3 Q.r-- ca . ~M ..... tn Q) 3= co c: It) 3: .....0 0..... .- c: b 3: .~ 0 cc c co a.. Q) (f) ::) -c c co ---l o N o N '" ~ ~ iij u ~ ~ ~ :::.:c~ ~ > 'ffi-~ ~ ~.Q::::J .S ~ c: ii ~ .~ '0 c: '" ~~~ - - ~ :t ~ (/) ~ CD as .~~-g~ ~~ o[[~ ~rn-g~::::> 'ViS>. ~cn~~ ~~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ & 0 .~ ~ g a; ~ .~ co sCfJ c: c:....I Q) ~.~E g'~'EOO 8.10 -gO~'~'~~~(/)-(/)~~D~Q)~io~ gWSKK~~(/)'~(/)Q)Q)EQ)~~n-'~ w~g~~g~.~~~o~~~g~~~~~ ~::::> Eo 0 -g-e~"O ~ ~ ~ Q).~-g~Q)ro 00 u~g~~~::::>mEw....l....l~~~O~zz~ ~~ D~ !DIIDDD~IDIID~D z*~ ::: a; <ll LL 0 0 0 N 0 0 l/) ..- Q) 0 0 co 0 () ..- C/) 0 0 l/) 0 0 0 l/) -c c Q) 0> Q) ---l Ll.l /'/</ Current Zoning Districts District Sa - Downtown (West) ~ I C'j.J Dt~ f~ I r-L/ r 1= I ~ -r == ~~ ~=ri-..J - n L....U. ~J ~r.:a:tJ:';; ii'i~-Ttu j 4 J.r II U f- ~ ..;;j, I ./Im 11 I~ L IL~I w~~ ~ E(Q OIIIJ [[ill I H' Iff!lrnPJl!;~ ~-< @II) BJID EIDJ [[[]] I-' I I I = BJII]] BJEJ [III] [[[[Q II I t ~ []JJE [ill] ffilJJ ITIIIIJ ~ . B. r~m~~eml ~ ~ . F~2:rrm ..~- II ~lln~m1r I ~ ~~~ ~ .., ~ 7D ELJ DO DIm [I][I] I p:r;rr ~. []J]E ,~8IJd ~ ITIIIIJ D tillIE t=t ~ ~ ~ V .I~ I~:;:j IITIIE11arnll ~~ E:J~~ md~~ ~~~ R-2 i R-2 L-c-~ tI ~~W@~~hE~~DI R-3 ~~i!.ilm ~-lll II - - - - - - --- - --, ----- - Cf-.~' IllJ _ u ULJ~ ~ ~I I III I ,''/- tr wrl,' ~ L F=- I I AI ~ I'T\ i--$?f I ~, ~I~ . I ~ , ~ lH ~;r.! l=n'c'In 1 !=r. LL I 1 PiIi,;'F ! . _________J ~~tr61 nr ~\ { \' ~\\\ .-/ ~ V~ ffiEffiB ~ i - ./ II I II III ffTTT Ii ~ 1// L__--/ ! bl ., , I 1 " f-- -j I --'-- ~ ....... ~ - ..... R-'3 1-- o -l C.S.A.H. SO/LAKEVII LF BLVD (j . R-3 ~ j - R-1 r ~ 1'\/ City Boundary C Neighborhood Districts Exisling Zoning - Downtown Wesl OJ A.' (Agriculture) _ A.2 (Agricullure Preserve) D R-' (Low Density) i R.2 (Medium Density) ! R.3 (High Density) R-4 (Mixed Code) PUD (Planned Unil Developmenl) , i B-' (Limited Business) B-2 (General Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) ILZl B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) _ 1-' (Light Industrial) _ C-' (Conservation) II!!!!!!I F-' (Floodway) G' F.2 (Flood Fringe) F-3 (General Flood Plain) ._' Water City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of the recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, s Scale 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet ,-- , 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Miles ,....-- , N w.' Souu: F..-minglonPlanning o..-on. OakOl.Cot.-.ty Surveyong & l...d ........,.tion~_ 5' Proposed Zoning Districts District 5a Downtown (West) \ \ ,; ,P" i '! dj 'n1 /::& r { ll~i,:L~:~r J -, ,lr-nHH------'-l~~("1 ,,_,L~C' .i Lnn', ''V.&?' j 1'lI1 ;-'-' I, I ,difnn' -,I 11 " ____' ""Ii" L___! j'-~I-~ , .t ,/ !!,,' f----1 8,r' ""-': 'l'j----., . I: !(~<:l t-h-j I ! U : ,f ,; ;2' r,L'i ,"'"Ln. '_l Y l{rf .f'~-::-...~-:::~::"-';J. ? 1.._ :----~ J U ~:~J 1;Z:trr:Df]l&?i,' . !,;7j! lJt1' LJ ,J i 1--1 f--!"'1 I i__1j -- ~'f'/'TTl'" ,J I-n""-",!,,,.J f--t-,,,! 'II'~- .,{i' Ijll[' !' lTilTTl, ; I lNl~.l--~ ",;I^ I ,-- ,--" ',- n'~" L~, Ll--' I ' ' .....-- ~~'1 '11"'LLOWST~~~'1n J,......- !~q J ,'nJ -_/ .-/ II :~~~~I~t ~=;::~ ~i~~-~~l,;::;=dc~J; , ~ d!-- -' """ t t I illlliIJ rnt-O I'f 'ir- rJ ~n-:rf(1 (lilT Et:'~;-~ lJJI'j' [rrrjr~ 1-1:,__0 ", I I i "uK, 'MAIN'ST n , L, ,'n,'__ u_"t ~ ' , I ] f1... ~UU BJE,i .ITIJ.l,.,.l.l. JIl. i. TlJ. ~ l..",:IIIft i"i-nnnn.nn--, ~ rnR fllI1 rTiT-! iFTI iTIln: ....J ,:=:~:~f):":~~j q-T~ ;:'l:fIITJ;:--' ~~q rrllTr:!~n;~::,~--.--------,- ~__J .,;":;jl.L~ ~ ...J.L...1 ~ :iL,,, ~ :,:L-,-_, ~ llil il ~'"r"'------'-'---- C::1 ::FrO]" -lID '" 'IT!- '" Tn::J ~TT""'n J ,\. 2[t~~;;l:Ll~, ,lJ~J IUJJ:.J~i:JL! ,,'::=~ \\ I [llIT1JI' : ~~~41S; [1'[, 1i ::::rT '-'! ffilliji I ...{F.:: =-~ p:,rrrq [! n...'! "'jL;,~ :' ~-D ,Am jd I' j ~1=- ~r-j -h t" L,!:8 ~:dL! JUJJJ U.illiJ n I ! 1 l1.. ~' .l.l..r.L w'TIJ I ~. JT,1.1-J. SPFt--::~,~;:jT fTT.[lIT1~. P],.-.BR,. ~J~~'J ~. ;.'tnl!.~'+-.' T1m fYiJ q !.LJ.lld tJ1lJJ uuLlJ 1-_.," ~ !!, [ljJJ 3;j-'lJ r:illir:l tr ilflTT! ,8 ~JNnFlT r--; '---n 'lTTTTl ;nT~~--- != r:JTiLJt'--i.. '=f~Sp RE I t-----'.-J. ~ }d-lli9.i:, Ff11J t-=' =1 Ej[:::J1. f=l.tS t::: n..J E--~:::-- Py,:::-l ~! ~:.('-'= ~ ~~... ---i ~~~ l~l--'-----.j l~-: -~ ,--~r'-l El---."-1 . ~~~_ .~:~ _L...__~ 1]...., r=:J~; r::~~i=3 j=' ,'c-,jl i '-:::;CI -:~ 2., [::trreJ' :j J L_Jd t=Jr..:-.:.1 '-.w as -r{! Cl t uU.U._ . 11 n c.-'p..'- .~""-~STn='~1 -L1'-1 H-'~"'T'1 I' ,., i L,:1 i=~ ~L~I!,~gJ I 1=11 'I ~------ u...lrfLfI:.II]~l,~I~-~~~--!--; I f.:--::=J ;----+.=1 I ,I , I---tr'-' I~ ) :.Li----' -j--, , , /---. i 'BEECH-STr--i[- . ~n_' I I 1'---+--'1 =in r5' L. j ..---" L ! . -,,':j f=~l:,~ '---JI-~ I ! i I BEECH ST 8i='i r" i ---I'lii r '--, f j i:.:"i~T': .~:=i~=1 G=ir::,j L~.=f: I ~' 'H LJt:J~I' '\ )11 F-p ; td/J:l ~t~sr=~=fl '-'\1 r-::-,T---] ~------1 t.::- ER I ) ~i f=-H Il-~!'t ":::) rm':i=j 1:---- -j't-=f==:i I I C.- tJ [--', R L:T--j ! D:J::JI I F=t,~~t IU---1 I! J LJr-~ ! T.H _ '-J_~_u. L..LJ jrm' t""; "1 . LbL,Y II,r~T I'll ~ ~Ii 111 J ,,! l ' ! I I l-~n - - -;' (I"ll 't--..,,,m --,:--.,,- ,/ I I ", \ \ - ).,'-J..,/,- I ~'I~-'+:'-=-~-==" I :'~M Fl'! i~' r i; '~' t:S/<-:'>.ir(l;h __J ,4-..J , .+~ \ --1F~ . I ___L. ;; I -= \-d:~:~;~~f{1 f +=J t ~____ -=1 f.-HTr' J J,d 8--:0. -., I =~~;~r.~T,~I,~U.l:':/f,1~~:+ 1 ---,;u----l I L)' Z It ---I +--:S:___..,....J/ ....L_i ~ i I I ::;LU,/, ,,-H. I,) i I t I I ' j:::'lrI ~ /1. ~--:Ei j ~HERI:AOE J':}I~-_IJ, 'rJ-r-r53p " I . !---i + ! I ! ft4-r [-1...-' 'H-l- ! l2~ :trr' -II i---'f:=l.1.~--"=ntl I .. LOv.8<HERlTAOE WAY1 r :=3:1=1='" __,_ __ __L _____ .. .:...:..l.'-!..!.' I I I ,r--' ~~___, _-='" \ I, I J -Q~'-': \ \ ,--, -,.-....-..j ....--, ~ \ I' I / ..... ", II', ~ ...____n__j_.__________.I!---. --, - _ I'h!2~8TH ST1I'---h';I! ,I _ ! ! I . i I I .... '['::::::tC::::--+:::::~::,::::~.~n/m+/'--- n____________h_'_ -.::::1 r'-~-----iii', " r' . ! .__f2.--Jil V " ! ,~tJi ' _ _ ~ -,-,.,\__\, -li_:.:,:, "'~""" --.',','..'J'! 1,1, -..,..~",.",..n,:,',:,. ..", ,___" .". - - i __ ._~__,i~:":m_'__::::.f.S~:~.:.:~/:~~,~t,~::.S:!-W-h:1 r-----i---~-- ---.--'-...-'----~'---~ - _.._- ) t /_-- ---, - ,') /"" --- - I I I I ------...-........."-.-.....--.-... -.-----.-.---- ...---, 'ItIT j J ' I ;.l/ i~'/'i j /' (I~ ,i i /, 1 j "..C fI . .~ i , i 'i I Ii: i ' : ,'I R-3 j i I I. I .._..~~..-.....__..~""_.___-"'=___=..,. -=--;:.---~~ .:____..._J-!---- New Zoning Districts A-l (Agriculture) , ~ B-1 (Limited Business) B-2 (Downtown Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighbor11ood Commercial) IP (Industrial Par1<) 1-1 (light Industrial) Spruce Street Cooridor BP (Business Park) R-1 (low Density Residential) R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential) R-3 (Medium Density Residential) R.4 (Medium/High Density Residential) ~:~ ~~~~~~:irr=~~~?;~~;)') . RD (Downtown Residential) Water ROW (Righl-of-Way) ~. City Boundary Neighbor11ood Boundary 7FIoodway Ovel1ay District PUD District City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of the recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Scale 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet , 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles r-o-_ , N w.' s SoIIce..FarmingtorlPlannlngDivtsoon.O"lu:Il.CounIys..veY"'9&ltlndlnf.......1'io"Depa.rtJrenI.C:'lG;sPm,M:tsll~zonongmep.p' //t;, a...... co "_ ~MCO '- ..... c: Q) (J .cC: Lt) 3: .....0 U..... .- c: ~ 3: ._ 0 CC c ro 0... Q) (f) :J "'C C ro .....J o N o N '" '" ~ 4: ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~;c~ ~ > o u " "- (1) "0 ~ g. .:; c:.,~ 'm > .S n:c3~ "8 .S ~ g;;S _ .... ~~~CI) :m Q)~ .~ ~ -g ffi ~ ~ 0 [ [ ~ -rn-gj2:J "u;C ~cn.Q~ ~CI)~m"CQ) Q)Q)~ ~cQ)cnc ~~ a5 S ~ ~ C: ~ a:: 0 "iI) a.. (1) a; c .Q ~ 500 c c...J ~ ~.~g a5~'EOo 8.~ ~~f~~~&~~~~~o~~~~o.~ o ....Q..Q..f/) Q)"cQ)Q)cPEo_cooCijl/) m~a5"8"8a5~.5~~o~~~ga..E~~~ .~:J E 0 0 ~ -e ~ "0 ~ ~ ~ Q) .Q')-g ~ ~ 10 0 0 !:!=< e iL: iL: a.::>al.!:al-'-::=<I~UO::ZZO:: <~ 0 m~! 8011000EJIDllmO a; OJ l.L. 0 0 0 N 0 0 L{) 0 Q) 0 0 ro ..-- u (j) 0 0 L{) 0 0 0 L{) "'C C Q) 0) Q) .....J LlJ z*~ ~ 77> Current Zoning Districts District 5b - Downtown (Central) ... - .! - I ~ r~ffiffiHE~ . IT I .i~ i ~L// I J'l ~ IT IIIII1I I Ilf~; I' -- J" - , - I~ I ,-- -I - - I ~ 1___~--:CU~B-n]~_~_L~~d~ ) 1 'II II.LU -ll -' ~____ ~\ I \ I - I',[~ II - I~~--;:"- ~ /y,t l I ~~ ~ ~r_ ~ EIJII] '~I~~~E~~ OJ ~ /( R 'l' l;ifjHr~~ mOHWI!1 . II I =cc ~ s=;E ITJIJlIIH J.I - Imi [[]] mmJ : ~ ~ thhr: . 1JJtI"fM~e~ ~D ,Ii ~ ~i.Tr5 ..1llm;1!m] a~~~ ~M ~ m:W..T, ~m!1n~~~~~~~~JHM~ c: 1~l1f1~Mi'ITIIITIE9 ~ ~ ~ DDU ~D --,~~i!~llw~~~:t ~~a~g e ~ tl1I1!I >= . m- ~ i,jfIT[ II II I liD ~ cg~~ )1I11,~m~~'1:" El2;1 Im~~I~ III -L~~~/llm~~T~~~~~ffi'l I~ J lJJillj g: ~~I ~lia ~ ~ =f ED . ~ D:'El tE I:L~ I i rn'. L~I:: L = ~ I I:~~~&-,,= r 1 I /1 / 1- aIIIrlIffb~ rI~' . .~ N~I ~~ I I. 1= mi'.. :4'R~3"4>.;....1 I ~ ~I= -- i;~ ',,,,' > ~I I I r::o.ii-..I,=, " !=~':"'_":"'::ll i I !-1 H 0.11 H ~F.:l'llJ I , P n fY'llM fi-21 =IH I I I Ii u_________J k_ll____L..L .L_.J:-J l I --- I I I J 1 - 'In - City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of the recently adopled Zoning Code following the proposed land uses wilhin the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. /,/ City Boundary C Neighborhood Districts Exisling Zoning Districl A-1 (Agriculture) A-2 (Agriculture Preserve) R-1 (Low Densily) ~ R-2 (Medium Density) R-3 (High Density) R-4 (Mixed Code) PUD (Planned Unit Development) "u B-1 (Limited Business) B-2 (General Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) 1-1 (Light Industrial) C-1 (Conservation) F-1 (Floodway) F-2 (Flood Fringe) F.3 (General Flood Plain) Water N w+, Scale 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet ~- , 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Miles ,-- , s Sot.ce: F.,....-,gIOn Plotnning 0;..;....... 0...01. C:.uoIyS~& Land............1ion Oep--.. 7715'" Proposed Zoning Districts District 5b Downtown (Central) . ; I. .., ~! / .f, (~.:) ,i 1..---- T fT l 'T.' (nn__ n'_ )' '- l -----,....-.: L.. ___, __ " , ,1'" I ,," '.i../! \,'-' r :"~I'~jl '1"1>'1"11 ."III~'II,B_.'; I E' ~-- .."'.'~ ;--r.-....----... -..--.-- -"'-l~" .. ..... ..... 'iT' j \ ..--r/::-.:.....-i1--r"';n=-::=:::::.~ I -, i ," '-:"',.\/-- \ J ~ I. ,_ ;' / ,..I' -- .l.//'--- I' ' I _~~/;.)/,'i) [:_~] -....... B:; ~, L;o 7T~''"iic'''"'-- __ ,'~1~~J.~?~\, 7~~- '____, _ - J'" l ...............-- ~--1 ")'1 L"'e"'_<"j,;,v\~ J""~"0.'~0., /"~"',-c--_. I .// '::',:f" ;f' . , _PlNEST _ ~ []JJJ]' ~,..i no '-!t~i:~~~(j:~~\i_.__.__.__.-:JGJ~mJ~~5Jf~" f.'--jI4 I . - 'I " ~ m.'. '. -, rrri1 rrrTT .' . ~ "'iit,,~fj[,~TE'mT!I!: (IT!lJ],-,,, "";~ if iL I _: L,-~.'~m._.-.'__.._--_-_". __,..~_..,-/-i-;-_-' ,.....0-_. '__;1, I, Rn:l!J ~ --. Ibbb1II LLldJi+'--B-1' 11 IrllILT}l1: {,j '~~m_JL_~; ~ I ; , -- " /~T---:= /: .... .HII ~~ rR [II[]] mJ]] rrilltl . , _:-- .~~g~ Slw~:~;-:~~.~~;;;~--.L~_-_- i --r---' ':<'~i--~~~:;~1H~l~~~;I:'I: .'m-' eLlJI~jmim9[!]-flt-~~~ .; ~~il~ I ' I Ii--- L --- t; ,,__L~ " 'It., , . ~'-f. ---1 '---r" "--'.' I ~ i7i~'j7~-;~ -:-- -} i '-. '\, : i::~-nB dnl~l "~P ,. \...., - I -- ~ ~~ L.Lc.,; -- ~l . - I - .' .-J f' ____.... ._______________n__.-..----.-J i-:L..L...J C'.t...l.LLJ , ..-:f:'\,,;'''' I' ._;~~~o____.,;~ ~~~J~ III m [ttf]jJ m' 1-1~_:~,if:::f~;ti-l:~q~?TJ [F~~~: , I; J:nUL -j' 1 II _ ~ - Z'T r. 'rn"--j :-:rT'ri [1';-\:/ "J1tj !--C'W,-,,< J!;~=;:~cr~~yA~ i~~h' ~ i~ ~ ~~l,~ 1~~~~:ii5~~'t~!~ fyj~~ r- --I--: I: --"'11' r-----f'! I' ~TI"" E9" .. ~ .,I~-=--!~'~rr'~.~':-i'ri~H.-':~:::~::J;:J1 ,~~N~:g:~ I J~ I,-..-J : j;::_~.::l l"T ~ '. tiillI ..., []] II;!; ._1- ,UJ- ]=1 t:::,h;__ H-l.d r..::,..L~ f-:i~u,=; --,<( I' -----------CJ I 'II' ," . '1-" ',. 1'1=8 E:-:')F\j~~E?rTrrl hi.,-rt B...J;::;' I : . ,~..__J ,--/' . ; 1i ~, I m - ~---------i ...LlJ....L_ ..~.: L-LL. J-LJ .. .d...LL t...JJ..LL. I I' ~ r ~ ' ,. Z " r T,-n-' c,_"""" rrTTl ".. r-- 0 ,-. ~, 0:: T:n, I I :.' '.' 8' g I , 0 r=i ,-~l!--, dU.,=! H-'--ir'=1 't:::[H ,11 ~--- I-~.i J).--i I , <1.: '--1 l hI ,~. r _ ~." -, . l> ::::--=:: ~~~~__r~~ ~-i-- r--I ~::L..,~~ --. - h..--l r-1~ I 1~---'---------------------------L~~~'=--:---.fTr'I' 0 ~ m .' -2 11~.'n--i t:~~:~~j~:""..~:a~~ ~~~r~~% i ! I . T Ii':} ,--0 b.: llj r .ulli , ! ' il1~ --\- j -----1---. - '-l--r--' --fT" r r f""~~-------""'--'---"--'----r----~"~-r""'l~-~ ~~ ' ..J......j I 'I . I' 1::::='1 (=j-\\.'~'-+)'y--i Jl.Ll-L./ / -- BEECH ST , r J_".....;=~: ~---;-j =-=~ -"2 ~F'~l f-.- '----r---.'~.-, i.... . ,--'---' ,..T---- I if . , I ell ----or H 'TrJ H / ~----ll---i--._-! !___+__]1 r--L/',><\)--..} j---.,-__/ J JI' . 1-::' -- ~ _ j- _1 r=':":"'~ !::-_J/ r':rr-~-'':~::-Hici.~v's~-w-:;~;:', (>t,~ ../::;1:..:/ ! Hle><ORY ST .~_1 (J,' - , , ---j::- l " I I ' I :. , i i I [ ..LJJ..J'-'::j r>---, 'L\,)".-,---- ,.. "., ./, .. ~I' r -,...., L___ ,----~. I I ,--.l'T"'''''~n' J~'Y' ,,1---. " \ ....... ' ' 1---- ,---, f-----J ' Ti;~:~;:~:;~~:d~;;;s~~->I"\:'~iL "! JI --1 TT ___ -'" .~~, ,~~~" tj~ I :_____......J L ------,-------; i 11"__""'" "1 ;--R;~ U. 'i/.'-'" - H----.. I : , : . , I "T \ j 1,--------------1 I ~ '~ ~ '\;..". I' " . I 1/,;" .. r...-i L..::. >------.-------1 ,- -- l'h.... ./ 'T:C;''';'';'i------~--.===---=='''..~ ~ ' ._~[' __,.0".'--'--..-.... ',. : I / I ! r-----n------e.". ' ,..------------1 /? f - ,",/ f -+. I I ~;//<:::/I' ...../-j fi~[: ]T_L_- ~ I,;.: .1"--.-" ,I !/ I ~"i6 --, J: L m__.__ ___...___. .L 'IL.1.l__.__ .._~ ..~__~--~::~__ _ __ _ _ . .______ __ ..J...! <..'. .IL_:.Ll L / I I 'f I , I ----1 I ..--------1 , ----I , " if I __,,,J--=:::c==.==>:_::',_-,.:-_:"-_,,c::=l:=,::....===, New Zoning Districts ~: A-1 (Agriculture) ~ 8-1 (limited Business) B-2 (Downtown Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) IP (Industrial Park) 1-1 (Light Industrial) Spruce Street Cooridor BP (Business Park) R-1 (low Density Residential) R-2 (low/Medium Density Residential) R-3 (Medium Density Residential) R4 (Medium/High Density Residential) R-5 (High Density Residential) R-T (Downtown Transitional) RD (Downtown Residential) Park & Open Space Water ROW (Right-of-Way) : \., . City Boundary CI Neighborhood Districts T I FIood~ay Overlay District + Histone PropertleS City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of thB recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Scale N 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet w.' , 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Miles , , S Sot6ce,FannngIOIlPllonning[)jy,.......O'koI.eo...rySllYe'f'l'l9&landlnlon'noltlOn~. C'lOif,Pr<.>je<:bIl~zoningmlop.apr 7'/7' c....... co . ~M ..... tn co W c: an 3: .....0 U..... .;:: c: 1;) 3: ._ 0 CC c co 0... Q) (f) :J -0 C co .....J o N o N '" ~ ~ ~ u ~ m ~ 3:4:~ ~ > 0"0 Q) 'co [ -g ~J2:> .~ ~ .S: ii: 0 1:- -g .=: ~ .2:E5 u.~o ~ C ~~~~ a5~ ~EQ) :;:;uc.VJ "OVJ oa.Q.u c:-~c~::J "oog>. :EVJ.2[ 2"'~ a3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ai ~ ~ .2 co c (/) C: ....J OJ (0 >- E c: .?:-.- a.o CD ... ~g~~~~~VJ-~~~~'~~~~8~ gms~~'iii~VJ~~Q)Q)EQ)~~n-~ OO~i~-g~~~~.==O~~~g~E~~~ ~~E.2.Q~€~u~~~Q)~~~~~oo o~gu.u.[~ooEm....J....J~~~u~zz~ <~ 0 ~iW 8 DIIDDD~IDIIUffi]D a5 Q) l.L. 0 0 0 N lLl 0 0 ~*~ l[) ..-- Q) 0 0 co 0 u ..-- ::: (f) 0 0 l[) 0 0 0 l[) ..11.. ...,"...... ;..~~ ""J" :-,,' ? ~. I - . - - :-;.. ,,:'7" ~ '-/;.~~ <f) I- Z W " W cr ~ w " ~ -0 C Q) 0> Q) .....J 7~O Current Zoning Districts District 5c - Downtown (East) -I A-1 1'\/. City Boundary C Neighborhoods Current Zoning Districts A-1 (Agriculture) A-2 (Agriculture Preserve) R-1 (Low Density) R-2 (Medium Density) R-3 (High Densily) R-4 (Mixed Code) PUD (Planned Unit Development) - B-1 (Umited Business) B-2 (General Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) 1-1 (Ught Industrial) C-1 (Conservation) F-' (Floodway) F-2 (Flood Fringe) F-3 (General Flood Plain) Water ":'~ I . I I I . I 1 l. I 1 . I I 1 I City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of lhe recently adopted Zoning Code following lhe proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Scale N W*E 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet ~ ' o 0.2 0.4 Miles 0.2 , s Sou-ce:Fannn<JlOflPlltrAngo;..;.oon.DP.ol.eo...rys.n.y;ng&landln/omwlion~ '/9:/ ,---. .-....+1 ' '-l"l . I.. ~,,/ ", )- ~ If 111 il~,~~;~~L~,:xr;:1.'Y- -~_ <,~;~ cc. ';;;~j:,/'~i' '~,~L~~,:C" /'t"--iI! L-~~~:>~ I ~/.". '~Lt J ".;jO~. ;liii"~ ~-- r- I . ' \1 ^' ;" '~".F ~'/;;>'=': 1 II i _- -l'nI~'r';'----~--'I;\ " /-;;. \, I r.--_n= " ,r. ,J. .~.LL '_,m ::iE"'- , ~..' ~1i'~:~ .-'-=!~ ~f<~'/--=;f?--' ----.- -.~ ..nrn,..____.._~'O'.)~ If II ' L' . . ., Ii... - "'O~j Im'..~-L.=ol . .~y'. I -0 I _".-:.-,\J....[?::-:.::~y~ I' . m I I "",_,: -- ~e;. f.:i:l. L. II --.-.z1' ,)" V/' Ii .~. 0 > '0'0., 1 'I Ii ~. cco~~h' Ord, i --..-.---.~J\i!rr~, 1 nn_._'______ -----1 (r~ ~~~~L. "J-----Ji"- (J !I :i l-~ ~ LUJJ ~- - tl 'I II (,',~.>..,~' : 'i'-j 'I Ij ~_ I ~~j r:r:--i 1 ': i : 1 ur-rrrr-t1] I J Ii <~>::--':/ ~ -- -- '1) ..." ,!iIl',lINOENST."- -tjlFr"r' -.~. --.r~ ,.-- r---'- ._~! ='--=-=-rh. ;,~" JLIL..-l ljJl.;~ r- _J II I -..;:-\ _-------..--. \ ,'. :; 1 "n < HI I IiT-T" ,.. ", '!-:" I' ,--~~. _.1 // /l! I f",fi:.I _-,--UU__, J I. JJJ LJ) 1~7"'~ -" I ~_ _/ I .--- " _/.. ..,f~"'''r,''1 ~'lm"_1 rrJ'Ll. OWST-::=_.~. ~...-'" 1-1 ,_'u=-. if I I I :;::::// / //~. 'if~~/,l~1 ifri ! -. e~'::'::':::':>/Ji lit I ' iiU A-1 'I i . .LX' . (~'l'~~Jim_!Jf;~~r~~ r=-;':::i ~~';;:;:l~]";:;:;:l"rJ '[i:;:":::i"~I"1 D ! ::--. '-.~ :;"-"~~. (i \ !i I '~i t.~_____::.: LJJ:::::l UllJ. U.ll. L__ __ .J B-1 1 ...._m___ t.C'~~_.;.rT~ J.:t'J. [lmn [TJJ.:U [I[TJ [rJJJ [Jlli~i ,: I 7. . ,m.' 'U', .. "U , r'TTT'- IlTTm,. I'TTTTP fTTTT'[ II 'r'~---L_--J~~h- ! I_! dlllU L1Ji:j LLl.L.J.J bJJ.Uj t1u-L.J ,-.J...J ll':'~]B UL==U I..Ii un F1 UUI] [IITI] J1m Ol1Q1 r'p-' ITFID", 'TTTrtl.;.::r\fo~ar't~ S=1T!J~' !Jr'TTl JITP...'IIHTlI I ' 11i.".LL"l~~u.., ",._,," d'::!,,_,. ._.."u.,L.1."....."...."'. ""il A~'J j.' l!1lij~!TTn~~r;~JF7/ h~~;~r~oL]~~[.~:;:~~!.~H);II?r.~Or~~lILJ!.~, J lrmDf[FI~1 f.tni"~ ~bL!I fi1!J rL~U,'j ,..~l~,~ [;~ IlJ J~ Jb f~l+. ~i . ' =)lU~~ J!! LJ :~Ii4-/~ .~J ~:::~~, ~jEj [~li~i tLll ~it=f~ 1 mn /-r.- T=:-j ",-ilr: [I--IT,I--U'~. ;~w;l: I 1 ~_nTi/ ,tpJ...;.:....J L~L.__ ~ !..l.~.. . ~__-,J l.L1l11l I I' - ':_' ~-~,'IJII'r I' 1';"':",UTSTlll1il' [Tl'l fT11' . ,--..L.....r=-Sl" :'rU,.~..J b.,>,~ f~'sJ ~"T~l"' II I I'.. , 'E! t._',=1'-: ~::":r.=j 5. '.- f., I l _n~r] H't~~ fJ~J ~~.:~~; Fj~ gu E~Gj ~:J II ~ aDT~ ~ g ,. -C,r C: :i~ ;r~;!:C:~:CC'~: ~ ~~ I ~ (.,1 -IilllT ':"j 1-3~ r~~t~~:j~ r ,.__~m_"__1 ~~8/~H II R~'. n ".,:;::;-;: fJ ,'",,, ::~ ,':~ i ~ '~ci l~ I! w "'\Y/-t. I _1gf iHCKORYST_.' t. t_ '---r- I B-1 f}Jt-~\/...-I--i,t' .'l?.J:.j f:.:'t=J :=~=:~d:.J I . p--j ~L II . . n',] '/\ '. .. -.,. ,g;1-i ,.. .If n, f- +i' - ,-=-.. . I [:~'1=1I.r-'r-' I .' , r.. /L lL. _~ij __I f >--:x LlJ ~ .--j-- I! - ----tit 1 ,1 J ~-ji . i ! roo; I ~ i I r--i I --l---d ::--'-l-""'---r "--;"""-~....... ........fi ", .@....., J,'-cfr;"" -~ I- . ." " '''..........1 J I" _",_,n,,_ '1-'" -."-. ""t 8T ATE HWY 50=-.c=--=~, I ' ii' i ! J.J .J' . , · ! I' f"- 1'.: , ' _.. ! , I , I , c." .~ l ~.. /'<'v' I,' ' I.J I f I I! I :r...('I\~- ....-.l J \--11+ -t.I._....-1-..J.__J. - 1- --1 ' ~ :~ 'n_' 11__ 1 _____~____;_-..J!~J-\J\~-=-.:>-;<'_.-; -,; I I i m-T =aIJIJT iHEB t -TrTTTl r {/ f l ./ /~~>" / New ZOning Districts A-1 (Agriculture) B-1 (Limited Business) B-2 (Downtown Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B.4 (Neighborhood Commercial) IP (Industrial Park) 1.1 (Light Industrial) Spruce Street Cooridor BP (Business Park) R-1 (low Density Residential) R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential) R-3 (Medium Density Residential) R-4 (Medium/High Density Residential) R-5 (High Density Residential) R-T (Downtown transitional) RO (Downtown Residential) Water ROW (Right-of-Way) ",,.City Boundary ~ Neighborhood Boundary 1Floodway Overtay District PUD District Proposed Zoning Districts District 5c - Downtown East City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a drafl zoning map of the recently adopled Zoning Code following the proposed land uses wilhin the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Scale 500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Feet r--_ 0,1 0 0,1 0.2 0,3 0.4 0,5 Miles ,-- , s.:...C'l:FarminglonP!.nnlng~.Ottkol.Cou>lyS..-y;ng&land~liol'lDepartment- C:\G..Pforecls\Z~lOf"Iingmap__ 7 CO' of a. co ns . :!EM co L.. ::s ~ "0 C Q) 0> Q) .....J '" <Il i'! -g ...: '" u ;: co ~ ~ ~ 0 :;: <( di 0"0 ~ ~~-g C 4) :::> ~ ~ .!: ll. 0 1:- u c: '" ~~~ u.. ;: 0 ro C cb~~Q) ~",-.~ CDQ) ~~ccn ~ ~Ea.> ~~C~:::> ~~ ~ng~ L" f/J ~ -"C :fl CD >- LJ (f) a5 Co ~roco~CQ) ~OCO~ ~g>wg ro -g ~ co c::.:: ro ~ co >- E C >- c.~ a.i ~ -g 5 ~.ffi .~ ~ ~ 0.. ]5 .;? ~ .~ "e 0"0 Co ~ 5m~~~'~~!~~~iEa.i~~~~~ m~~"C"Og~c~cO~.2o~o..'c~Q)~ ~:::>~~~~€~~~~~i~~~1~~o ~::2:eu.. u.. c..::JmECD...J...J::;EIQ..Ua::ZZO:: <'~ 0 8 DIIDDD~IDII~8JD Q; " u. o o o '" - c co 0.... Q) CJ) :::> "0 c ro .....J o N o N o o o '" UJ (g ... (.) ~*~ Q) ro () (j) o o o N ., ~ i!! ....z 0", z" c"' ~a: "" d~ a:<Il" f?2t; ~~~ ~~cr ~~~ ;&~ 2l?~ o o o ~ o .- L.. ... In .- C ... In Q) ~ o o o r-- pa~T: \, F". 7~3 y~ A-1 :.-c.: A-1 t-''' ~ LYo ~ r----------~ ~ I\A-1 ~ \" " " F-3 V 0- "' 1'\/ City Boundary C Neighborhood Districts Current Zoning Dislricls ~-' A-1 (Agriculture) A-2 (Agriculture Preserve) R-1 (Low Density) D R-2 (Medium Density) D R-3 (High Density) ~ R-4 (Mixed Code) D. PUD (Planned Unit Developmenl) OJ B-1 (Umiled Business) = B-2 (General Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) I'2ZJ ~ (Neighborhood Commercial) _ 1-1 (Ught Industrial) _ C-1 (Conservation) IIiiiiiiiilI F-1 (Floodway) D F-2 (Flood Fringe) D F-3 (General Flood Plain) DWater Current Zoning Districts District 6 - West Rural I-~-;I - . ~'= [j~~== ~J'~~~~. i; Il ~~I!'!1I", '&( ~.~..I " #-II1.~ .i\1~ ~, (81 ~~IIII ~ IlIlrle' ~/ ~~t IIii' \. u / ~.~ [L1I( ~ r ~ . IISW\ ~jl~~" . r .1 ~l.~~~rt~ ~F~ 'l ~~~\f~~~ ): ~~ B~~~\ ~ T J aK/tlr- o ~ U , tIimiffiJ=: I I ~~ I(j( '~~J; . I ~ f"'~'- A-1 I - lJ-- -' I "'-'3 JI) ,? r~ t I -- ~~~~ f- 1 / /': ~D~"~~ ~?TH ~T_.__ l Ii :;= '1 ~4 !miiHffijHiHlffi1JnnE~ r I '- U ~L ~tlil!JBIlrlffillllffilB J 'lAII ~ ~-r~,=DIIIII=m~~~aIIL ,,~J/~ 1 ~ ~~@liil~~1iJ 1h/jg i ? ~ 10 111~lr ~ ? ~ mimllw ~m~ e- A-1 ~b .J:u. ~TU~~I~~lr,cq:-TTTTT TH- :JJ I ~ '\ , \\ \-1fW~ ('0 :Jt ) f- ,~ f c- :~A City of Farmington Planning Division Note: This is a draft zoning map of the recently adopled Zoning Code following lhe proposed land uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Scale 2000 , o 2000 4000 Feet , N w+, 0.5 , o 0.5 1 Miles . s 79;<1 Soosce_F"'monglonP\anningo;...;e.ion.Dakol.Co..'IIys..n.y.ng&land~tIOllOepattmenc ~~~~~I;:~l-f~~ffii;;1if:~ .: :~w~[-!i(g~lf:~_~!f/t_ ...... '\0... 4.,."1,' /.:(.; t, 'T1"r'-~fl- - ~J jW!t~.t1~~~~,.,~.~~,.I.:~:~j -- ~ -i'fJ;~:,;~':/~~: mjr~~:lij ...\)%..g-_-~ ~ ~~~ffiffiHBt~ ;." ~ ~'ilii.r~Ij!t"Y:;;:;'+: i.r2J1 ~>.'(1ti:li,:W':>>-S8FtRffiHi !l ~ ;-+;-;'~~~;I1t'~';t--n-'!TT'\I~,\v:;t,;~p..~M~r!rlr;rrrr.8 lJ> '\ >"r' "-,)V \:\''''1"''''1 [\\---"lWJ:H1," ""~Ht-'.r'Iiil ~ I ~Rd32:::~\1- ~1'Ii-Elf .1l:]3.F~jl'fl,1',~P#~~] .. . ":-'[I!(;iIi\:;LW-,clilTI';'I) '~-]r 'S$'~":~';;)~.: ~ '~, _' ':':-'''';1,<)11 i--'t ~1 'I.&>~'I'-t:llii.ffi~~t] -'L'o:'>-.-ffi.i)lY "" 'i' ~~<"-ttjttmtt!Ht"",R,, ''IT''' ~"ji+f'" ~ >~;-M.' -1 cJ'-'Uiil 'PiiH~l,&i:J:'.""',-- ,:1;,\ -;c- ^ ~ 1 H~L. "'.Q'~ ~lrr'" ' ! .,. , i" .t.~~::';~:;r ~~ '~j,~l '~~f:pJjT;i-}~-,.v I 7' ~ I f~'~(?,<r~' \nt-.:"'"" ~\\{ 11 ::'j"jE)~ffi~"" !JJ.~~-j ~;~^t"l\ ~~;1~(0:'~E;: : Ewr~~-i" ::)'<$\~~i;E: ~ P~~J~i~~:"~~J~~l:~~~;~~J ~~rn~~~~~}~~~:;K~g~ I "r:" /.it: ': ~ .':'>)".' 'rqrw.;;.,\",(>.,..){q,~ A-1~' ;J'0&:-ij;{EiI0::;P;>:A ~'f1?cn\\\~t'5:2,0-'lt~ .~< ~Tr?,_......i--1\ :,\"-::~'~ -1.\ T~ rrrCT ",,,~~, ''''/,'''. ~\Il -{~rrrtqt.T1'1~~ /~ -x.....:'i,;;:.t'l ./p ,'.;_u.........,,.'/~ <T./'\.<,,:.I I. ~';~ll~ :~1~;;t~~~,:~.;;, '.; '\'s.~ .:'E::~,';;m:~W:7:r ~1 \~ ~;!j:CC~ f.fJ>[ ,f,,...~~q'1 f.-iJr;:,.:/(.\ t:-"\:lht1:2"::,\:' '.:.mrt::-~:.:'7 ,\\ ~~-'/1,~.~E?j~\~~?8rl ':': ~),~:: ~ j,tl51lIf2:~,~;;~~..~JIJ:"/ ~ ) . i' .'fI' ".'1:. 10/ y~!"l 8IcP,\\:Orr"F'(JlTIT" '.',", h j~, ~I r-1'r\J5~ f[i'~ifc;.:i~J'.:J/ JltJ~<~IB~~.rlq_l\~~rnU1...tl~:~:~'~/ (, f:r ~;~:Ja'~'.~\\'f-t--1i rii:'~l~ill\Fr-\.'l:*>;i:'~~' <:;~"'\:l> . I ~}-:-j. ,'.. rjtEr-Iy"'! _..-1-i_'J. ~. 1<1:tti.)~~~-..,'~ \::1 r E'~':::'-""V"'-"\"1~':011 \iJ,,:,:-;-jq f'~. j-" -" ,JI-'~""~'" ~:~+ ,///;..\;.1 8H-"';'i r-4 ~_l j ~- r::-. .... ""'I" ~Ul51i~~.f-;,;rYJ~~! ,i=\;:?;)f.t~l ,1hBi:3 ; ~Rd64/j95lHSTW-':1Tnll1T'IC' <, <,'r--' 1 ~,'''-, 'TTITlH ; p,:; I ~:U.LJ1L\.lliJ ,~" , Ir).~, t ,-jPJ::rrIT[f'~ " I' _ ,i.J/ ':f ~ i I, t\;~..-?tr'\,,;:j.'~ I II 1\ .... /F I... ":':\<,':,;,r;'~''f\j t I 1<.6. I .. "~p;: '-5\ , <'.J " I. " ?j" ~ t:::(,;.<:;;';,~'c,~ "_~~' '< ,.. rT~:~~~~\~?1A L I'\~~~\ '~i,-\ ~'3(, ':::1i.. "dt:r:c-., > 1 \ \- r . '\ ..' _ .~ (,\ L I I :::-1~~""''''_J.,-.<'':1.:jnJ '- 1\\- 'i \.-" \~:'\;:\Tnl 1'\<,; \ 4-Itc1"~l;ri7",.c,-T'-,,, \\--\ ;J,~e,.J, "'''.. --', I ~ "~~)~fftff-\.~" ,,) l~ I \~; : ~11r.:~ I \~~ 1~ ~~~""$f~Z:/~;~{ ~ -t~~ ~~\~~---- -~ -\1-~-. -. 3'-~._~-~-~\~=~= -1- __n - I '.- _':iI!.' '<. ti1;r~L"'--l'\C:-_h.__.J\ r-~~ ,-"i '. , t" I :~'l:;k~~1 11!,,~~:t;~J8 -", i l; '::~\:::~<~\\ \, ,.J ! ' "'>)(:>'(') t..if,~);J~ < l \~'-"' ~ \ l' \ ,/ , \9t,lt'l=>> 1>1 c",,;y>~.<---,. ';, "- ~~'1'1~"'-:1 '1.-:=-:-"'" 1.,,\;'Ift'i_--,-_A -.... , \ I ~ ,'2;\\ / - \"'i--~-'--\'\ \ " " J!k;~;;:~--- / I ~ ~7.C8d~~ \ I , ....It'r; <;;~\~"" - 1 --'T1),,[ (,\ -, \ , , ' I a?..\.~..:(..)' ~ ...}....,.::--" f) r, >\ ....., /' , I CJ .j,t ".,,-\ ~ I ( '-~i'i-\-.rV<:t-'1:;- ' //1 I l I c5 ~~-'}:f):~, t.:~/J~"""1 ~ - 1 A-1 w ,,'. iir:'QPc.;.;i:.:~\:v \'\\ L.._Il'CTI:~:;~L i1 ,,[Dcr!"... r \ \'1 i'\~\ I '- ~ r7..;';J _r \ ~ ~\ ~~\ __.y 'i,ji \ ~ I 1', \.~"\l""'---':-}-"--'-- I (t ~ '" El:;J..::'~':~o!:'g~! r L g rm.. -'p~+t. T" ~ - - ---- ...J , 1 r"~'" \. ii:r- ,~' L<. '" CSAH 5O/LA~EVILLE~LvDJ-rJ~_-rIJ~:: 1.-. .._ --=-_. I ". ~~=~% .n"" . ,~.j~"- .; .-=00;:' - r--"'" "Pm1" 11 I J 1 1 ~""'-( IJ[ffiN- i1jffiLrj\fu1J~, I ! I '1 ~'v-' jI.l'i1ITIl3ii "ITJW!]'!llJiITP , , oo' 00 ~.J, ':IITIB !UIJ 1!!1liJ U"ill ti,ITI ~__._...m";ln ,... .m~-I__ .' I' ~'-"7 l~iL;!i s:JfJIJ~OJ!1l]llJI[W I "....... r-'""'" L llil.t~ . oillf ITillII L1! [ITffi tlIIlIlt .,.. -I 1-/'!1 r m,.,' OCli' 'I;mmIT",~nrmmit= I "",. ,_ __< --u. t::' ... _ ~ -!~rf;~-_- '- _ _.t. - - -,....I ( II ~ :~ ~Hjl.:">- Jiw~~ ',. L --- i!;.--. -.oooo..'.ll!'___'~'" .oo"",hE' ". ",- .... - - - r,...-- ., I "'; I'" I u. .... - - 1~':rV~:';[T:;~-:f,e~~~'__ ':r,---.too..d;~f!~ ,P:P~ A 1 ,..j,.:6-'1=1H )VJ--' " p:8 ~ = "LW, I~. .l EEl "i''''~'! - 'f;;":'r,,~,;;,'(vf1:'!ldffi~;.J3 J ----Hg.:jrnl! (IEfj I'T I '"~Hrir~ ~~~:":-Ni'I;!",jflt-:1!~oi I~ '1P.M h ~'t:t:l ---....~=~i=-f7==""I Ir . . , .' '. :.:-'~ > _'" Ii! , ,,--.-.,...-: ~_I Ii II ! U:L ii,.....;H.ll!I, .4 tfJI ! i A-1 -"'" New Zoning Districts A-1 (Agriculture) B-1 (Limited Business) B-2 (DolM1town Business) B-3 (Heavy Business) B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) IP (Industlial Park) 1.1 (Light Industlia') Spruce Street Cooridor BP (Business Park) R-1 (Low Density Residential) R.2lLow/Medium Density Residential) R-3 Medium Density Residential) t R-4lMedium/High Density Residential) R-5 High Density Residential) R- T (Downtown Transitional) RD (Downtown Residential) Water ROW (Right.ol.Way) ,:"v'City Boundary ~ Neighborhood Boundary I FlOOdw.ay Ovenay District PUD District Proposed Zoning Districts District 6 - West Rural , , \ " \ \ \ I "" , , '-.-.......-..~~ , \ \. \ .\\ I {~---_.-.;f::._'--+."._-'l iI ~ c: z " t-oo.. ..._.............-... ........~ i'\ :J: ~ m ._-~~~_.___n_i5 /' m ~ :l: i ! ! \. ''\, \, \\ ',( " ~, ~_.~~\:--T- "-- .\t \\j 00_")\ - , .., City of Farmington Planning Division Nole; This is a draft zoning map of the recently adopted Zoning Code following the proposed iand uses within the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Scale N 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet W+E , 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Miles r--_ S )% ~:F.rrl'Ot'ol/IOf'IPlerRngo;...;.;o".[)&kot.eo...IySurwying&l.ndlnlormalion()ep/tl1mefl(.C:\G..p,.~\Zoning'.fwwzononymap..pr City of Farmington Proposed Zoning Districts DRAFT I _ " -- ,. /..1 / -, ................ ....., ......... ~ \ , , L'.. A-1 A-1 A-I 1\-1 iii ill ..,.., r;I A- > ,.. - ,. 1\-1 Downtown -2 iI.~~ mMAI~~T ILFIF":I Il'iiII'1I m llll1riITmrrcrnl JIM .. g]] ~ liilJJ] lii[]]]] liiEIJJiJlii -~IE!)~RJTIm~ .. []]]] []]]] BmI - ~> >>~ []]]]] ..> ~ rn:rn -..-- - >. []]] 11'li~ Legend ~ /\/ City Boundary l \ / Floodway Overlay District D PUD District + Historic Properties New Zoning Districts ~ A-1 (Agriculture) _ Park/Open Space ~ B-1 (Limited Business) _ B-2 (Downtown Business) _ B-3 (Heavy Business) ~ B-4 (Neighborhood Commercial) _ IP (Industrial Park) D 1-1 (Light Industrial) ~ Spruce Street Cooridor _ BP (Business Park) D R-1 (Low Density Residential) D R-2 (Low/Medium Density Residential) D R-3 (Medium Density Residential) rn R-4 (Medium/High Density Residential) _ R-5 (High Density Residential) D R- T (Downtown Transitional) c::J RD (Downtown Residential) D Water D ROW (Right-of-Way) /Ii . -",..s--f- ~ I 'sl r" /~;lt . \ \ ."",, 'I .~:'.;t N w+, s City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us ICj FROM: Mayor and Council ~embers, City Administrator~~t ~V Michael Schultz, Associate Planner ~ TO: SUBJECT: Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION Maureen Juaire, M & M Homes, has requested approval of the Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat, the plat consists of four (4) single-family lots and one (1) outlot on 1.4 acres ofland located on 213 th Street w. DISCUSSION The applicant, Maureen Juaire of M & M Homes, is seeking City Council approval for the Preliminary and Final Plat of Farmington Acres which consists of four (4) single-family lots and one (1) outlot on 1.4 acres of property. The property is currently zoned R-l (Low Density). The Farmington Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council at its April23rd meeting contingent upon the following: i. The Engineering Division approves the revised plat concerning the rear easement line on Lot 2 relating to the proposed storm water pipe. The applicant's engineer understands that an additional five (5) feet be added to the easement to allow for at least ten (10) feet of easement on the south side of the storm water pipe. Another issue that the developer has addressed is concerning the encroachment of property on the west boundary of the proposed plat. The developer and the adjacent property owner have entered into an agreement that Outlot A would be conveyed to the adjacent property owner once the plat has been approved and recorded at the County. Sewer and water already exist for the proposed lots, no street breaking or repair will be required, the City added four (4) sewer and water service lines to the property during the reconstruction of 213th Street two years ago. The Parks & Recreation Commission has requested that a trail be constructed within the right-of-way; the trail would eventually connect to the existing trail along the Bristol Square development and also extend west to the future commercial area along Trunk Hwy 3. 7<tS'"/ BUDGET IMPACT None. ACTION REQUESTED Consider adoption of the attached resolution approving the Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat contingent on Engineering Division comments. cc: Maureen Juaire, M & M Homes File /~ RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING PRELIMINARY & FINAL PLAT AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL PLAT FARMINGTON ACRES Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Farmington, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of said City on the 6th day of May, 2002 at 7 :00 P.M. Members Present: Members Absent: Member _ introduced and Member _ seconded the following: WHEREAS, the City has received an application seeking preliminary and final plat review and approval of the Farmington Acres proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the preliminary and final plat on April 9th , 2002, preceded by 10 days' published and mailed notice, at which all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS; the Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval on the 23rd day of April, 2002; and WHEREAS; the City Council reviewed the preliminary and final plat; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has rendered an opinion that the proposed plat can be feasibly served by municipal service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above preliminary and final plat be approved and that the requisite signatures are authorized and directed to be affixed to the final plat with the following conditions: 1. Preparation, approval and execution of a Development Contract for Farmington Acres; 2. Submittal by the Developer of all documents, security, and fees required under the Development Contract; and 3. Approval of the construction plans for grading, storm water and utilities by the Engineering Division. This resolution adopted by recorded vote of the Farmington City Council in open session on the 6thday of May, 2002. Mayor Attested to the _ day of May, 2002. City Administrator 7~ ~.._.._.._- --l i i WILLOW ST Po D "EJ D ELMST D D ~D D D i ,..-________.._J i i i i i i _. ........~...; -...",.................. .."...........,.".- ..".......... roO .................,.,....".. j f , -,j -..".. .--....-.. PROPERTY LOCATION , i ! I L_ -------i______J --"l_. I I. . , 'I I I I. , l_.L____..__J --..---..-----..-., i -------..------j ''''; -. -' ..................--- .., > 3: J: l.:: Z ::l ~ _.- .".--" -_........~.._..- 213TH ST W D D 000;0 DODO Allina Clinic Trinity Hospital ....., 1.--.- /90 ~t\ll"'_1'OOOtSV""""",,~\st-....,,,.-Pla'."'" ~=-r;~~,,_ I \1,. I ,,' " Ii': I \~~ PlO-l~03200-050-2l!I I I 'r' . . I ~. I P11)-14-G3200-0e0-28 I :J~ ~ 1 . 500'7'3 ... . OUTLOT A , I I I I I I I I~ I .-. I II! C") I I I :~: 0 L______ ______-1 ___c::: r -, ".7 I u, N ~ I ~ I I :~: ~'-3 I 0 I ~ N C") ~""<: ! I :>:: I ~I ~ I I S L___________-.J ;1 CI) ::0 ~ I .. 2>' ~ '-3 8 I \ 81 ::00 ~~~ ~:.. I \ ~ 1 I c., I I! '-3t;:, S I I I Ii L______ _____-1'''.0 '-' ~ q I 3: ~ I' I CI) ~ I I '-30 ~ I I~ 1 '-- q .... ..- . I II! I F: ~ I I q L_____________.J ~ i ~I N ~ SOlM:TJ2"W 18.).00 ~I' '1 ~ I 1'tO-'4-03200-~28 I I 1 I I I I ~~~~~~ ~ f~ I~I~~~ ~ r~ ~~:d U I!II I ii ~)m .. M I S~i s ~ of. [iiii] r hj[ ~,. f1 I 0 ~~ ~i 3: @ ! h. L J ?< [ m~ - ~ ~ W r ~ [iiii] I 0 r -; = 1 fW 1-'. ... M I . ~ ." cg: . J j I :-:-..:J I .. '..::J !!! " !ji) S '\5=.:':0'. =::,:' ~[]- CdmO\'" ~~..~~~1::' ~~IIte~th. FMlJlINCTON ACRES COVllllSBI'I'Tjl>IlEUJllNARY PIA JI ~ JI BOJlBS. UC 1NllO ~. Way "Gm'lhlJtao.M~oS!5(l24 Pflanr. (t!!I2)t!3-t9S3 ""'" (t!52)e3-t954 HEDLUND PI..AJ#IN(J ~ SUfLnM' 2005PlrlOakl:\rtlM Eogs\."'"~'21 f'tIOIIr. (liS') <105-8600 "aIC:(e5')~ U!W~l jn!l~1! ~ iih!Y' ~ lle~lgll ~ 1IJ.!r= ~ l~ihill ~ hi~li.i .. fillolll 'ftf'l '-Jill · l'li ~'f '[if II( j" {fflo If,! 'I ~ i' ~ :n ~ it~ ~ ~~ Ci ~ " ..... ~~ d it S. ~ S'16 ~ ::Ht :b. =::1 n it ;Q ei .".. 0 .:: 91 4': il ... I 7'7/ o......t\ll..._~A_1ON\..\!tMwII\PI'-..... \.<I_I:~" [Ia''''A.. 3O,2Oll%.t:.u.o \ ; I ~ I : 1\ ~ I 1\ i ! II III I 1 ~ i 1~~ ~ ,\ ~ ~: ~ ~ 1 ~: III II III \1 II ,n III :;! III "-", II ~1~ ~~l -"1"'~1: : "III ~II J II r :E I 11! ",I I I I I !il I l ~ I -,----" I ~ I . II ,- I ,J I : I '_. L__ I :f---- I ~ I ~~ l I. .I~d I . ,- .-, I p IH: I S'i rn J I:~ 'P- ~ I ~ :t;- --;~ ..... ITVFr- - - -I~ !hl ; ~B Q 'I:. ~ ~. ~l: ~ r- :~J l\\): ... .... II. ~~ ~;.: I ~ ~B ~ I "~ r-- ~ II ~: . ~ ' .-.--JJ I I I~ ~!- J~--I-l _X_X-X-I J W ~IJ .--TJ cJ I ~JM 1Il~.M -, II I Ill" I :I! I ,.J _,+-03200-00O-" ~ I i L_.J I L....,~..... ~ I ~I rj;t~ ! I ~. I h!i! S I !I ~ . I ~ \ I III ~ I ~\ij ! I ! I j I lr--, ~I I ~I ..d-'~03~28 ~L_ .J ri L-I r-l I I I I ____J I N c., t 1\'111 I; IIIH ~ rn ~ r. I' OJ rf r l! it fT ~ i~ i! i~~11 Ii .. ~ uunn J'to"....!! lI' ililUU ~~n Q ~~~ ~ .- I Uiil11 ~ ~ - = all a a III I c-0 cg jj~n 0 ~ = c-0 UUi] tiff 8 ~[] -- . HEDLUND PINM/ING ,ENtJI&RINIG .st.I'MlM' 2005 Ph Oak omoe = ;'sl)S5~_IIIOO f'a:(1l5l)405-IIlI0ll ~,. ~~~~ ~~ UC.-cI P~al~'" uncIIr &lQ~ ~ FAJ/IlINGTON ACllZS SITE AND UTILITY PLAN 11 II: 11 HOliES. UC 1neoFlrwt_Wd)' fam'lhttGn, .....-~1I 5S024 "'- (952)953-1953 ,"'" ('52)lI53-9t54 ~ Ii' ~ to ~ ~~ ~ ~\ C) ~ ~ ~ ~i a Ii :t I g ~ = n it ~ ~ """0 34:: gl . ... ~I 4 7 lID I .. . .. /9~ 2~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651)463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: City Planning Commission FROM: Michael Schultz Associate Planner SUBJECT: Farmington Acres Preliminary & Final Plat Approval DATE: April 23, 2002 INTRODUCTION Maureen Juaire, M & M Homes, has requested approval of the Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat, the plat consists of four (4) single-family lots and one (1) outlot on 1.4 acres of land located on 213th Street W. This is a continuation of the public hearing heard on April 9, 2002. Plannim! Division Review See attached April 9, 2002 staff memo. DISCUSSION The applicant, Maureen Juaire with M & M Homes, LLC, has submitted an application for Preliminary and Final Plat approval of the Farmington Acres development. The proposed development is situated on 1.4 acres of land and is zoned R-l (Low Density) Residential. Single- family residential to situated the east and west of the subject property, Glenview town homes is located to the north and Trinity Terrace to the south. The Planning Commission heard the initial public hearing at its April 9, 2002 meeting and after hearing the staff review and public testimony recommended continuing the public hearing based on resolving engineering issues in the rear of the property and disputes over the westerly property line. Status of Outlot AlConveyance of Property The Developer has met with the property owner to the west, Jackie Franke, to discuss the conveyance of the westerly fourteen (14) feet of the property in which the two parties have reached a tentative verbal agreement. The attorney for Mrs. Franke is reviewing the draft agreement and the developer is attempting to have the document fmalized before Tuesday night's meeting. The conveyance of Outlot A to the adjacent property owner would eliminate the encroachment onto the applicant's property. The City would request that Mrs. Franke have the properties combined by the County in order to form one legal property with one property identification number. The cost of that procedure should be minimal (if any at all) when requested during recording of the deed. 793 Engineering Review The Engineering Division has continued discussion with the Developer's Engineer on resolving the drainage issues relating to the rear yards of the proposed lots. Dave Sanocki, Engineering Division, has indicated that the revised plans would be submitted to the Engineering DivisiOli on Monday, April 2200 in order to finalize the review. Staff will update the Commission on the status of the revisions on the night of the meeting, staffis confident that all major issues will be resolved prior to forwarding the plat to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval for the Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat to the City Council (May 6) contingent upon the following: 1. That Outlot A be conveyed to the adjacent property owner to the west in order to relieve the property encroachment; 2. The Engineering Division approves the revised grading plan relating to the rear drainage of the proposed lots prior to taking the plat to the City Council. Cc: Maureen Juaire, M & M Homes Project file /9~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: City Planning Commission FROM: Michael Schultz Associate Planner ~t/ SUBJECT: Farmington Acres Preliminary & Final Plat Approval DATE: April 9, 2002 INTRODUCTION Maureen Juaire, M & M Homes, has requested approval of the Farmington Acres Preliminary and Final Plat, the plat consists of four (4) single-family lots and one (1) outlot on 1.4 acres ofland located on 213th Street W. Plannin2 Division Review Applicant: M & M Homes, LLC Maureen Juaire 16880 Firestone Way Farmington, MN 55024 Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Plat Application Location Map Plat SitelUtility Plan Grading Plan Landscape Plan Lee Mann letter to Developer, April 4, 2002 Location of Property: North side of 213th Street, east of Trunk Highway 3, across from Trinity Terrace. Surrounding Land Uses: Single-family to the east and west, townhome development to the north, institutional/multi-family to the south Existing Zoning: R-l (Low Density) Residential Proposed Zoning: R-l (Low Density) Residential Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Current Land Use: . Vacant /; 795' Minimum Lot Size: 10,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width: 75 feet Lot Size/Dimensions: Each lot measures 76.5' x 193' = 14,764.5 sq. ft. DISCUSSION The applicant, Maureen Juaire with M & M Homes, LLC, has submitted an application for Prelimnary and Final Plat approval of the Farmington Acres development. The proposed development is situated on 1.4 acres of land and is zoned R-l (Low Density) Residential. Single-family residential to situated the east and west of the subject property, Glenview town homes is located to the north and Trinity Terrace to the south. The property has been vacant since it was annexed into the city in 1995. During the reconstruction and turn back of County Road72/2131h Street the City stubbed out to the property four sewer and water line connections in the event that the properties would develop as single-family lots. The applicant has withdrawn the original twin home concept that would have allowed for the construction of six (6) twin home units on the property, this voids the Conditional Use Permit approved in November of2001. Status of Outlot A The Developer intends to convey the remaining fourteen (14) feet of property, forming Outlot A, over to the adjacent property owner to the west (Jacky Franke) who has encroached unto the applicant's property. Landscaping The applicant is proposing to maintain a number of the trees along the back half of the property in order to provide buffering to the townhome units to the north. A landscaping plan has been submitted for the planting of eight (8) boulevard trees. Parks & Trails An eight-foot (8') bituminous bike path is being requested by the PARAC to be constructed as part of the project; there is currently a bike path that was constructed to the end of the Bristol Square development, approximately 275 feet to the east. The developer will receive credit for the construction of the bike path in lieu of park dedication fees. Engineering Review The Engineering Division has forwarded comments to the Developer concerning the proposed development (see attached letter dated April 4, 2002 from Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer). Of the six (6) identified issues the following are recognized as significant issues that need to be addressed before forwarding the plat onto the City Council. #2. The proposed grading plan contains rear lot low points with no storm sewer or swale outlets. #3. Rear yards may need to be completely re-graded to allow for proper drainage. An easement is required for drainage that crosses property lines. #5. Emergency overflow elevations are higher than the proposed lowest floor elevations. 79C; RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends continuing the public hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting in order to allow the Developer sufficient time to address the engineering related issues. Cc: Maureen Juaire, M & M Homes Project file 79'/ APPLICATION FOR PLAT REVIEW DATE 3. \ <=1 .~ PLAT NAME WY1'<'\~~~ ~ ./ LOCATION ~\~ AREA BOUNDED BY TOTAL GROSS AREA I /4 ~ ZONING DISTRICT(S) ~ \ NAMES &.ADDRESSES OF ALL OWNERS ~~\LLC__ - ~1'Ceif)V.~ --J\).n~ \~~ W~ ~\y)\r\~ t"'{u.J ~ PHONE: q~.~Q~- ~05~ NAME & ADDRESS ?F LAND SURVEYOR I ENGINEER +\:::-0 \U'('()~~ ~ ~ ;;)r-r-R +>\"'C)O}' 'H?)~~~~~ _ P E 16\. . (oI.oO() N&'1ES & ADDRESSES OF ALL ADJOINING PROPERTY mmERS AVAILABLE FROM: ON: ~V;3Z ~.Jh~~~'f"'\ ~ PLAT REVIEW OPTION: PRELIMINARY & FINAL TOGETHER: PRE PLAT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE: IN SEQUENCE: PRE PLAT SURETY: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM (w"E ARE) THE FEE OWNER(S) OF THE ABOVE LAi.'ID. THAT THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT HAS RECEIVED A COPY OF TITLE 11. CHAPTERS 1 THRU 5. ENTITLED "SUBDIVISIONS" Al.'ID TITLE 10, CHAPTERS 1 IHRU 12 ENTITLED "ZONING" OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE AND WILL PREPARE THE PLAT IN ACCORD&~CE WITH THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. ADVISORY MEETING: 1. SKETCH PLAN 2. STAFF Al.~D DEVELOPER CONSENSUS "/9<6" /D~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council M~bers, City Administrator<) ,L Lee Smick, AICP V.SL- Planning Coordinator FROM: SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 10-5-5 (C): A-I Agriculture Uses - Interim Use Permit and Consider Application for a Soil Pulverizing Operation DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The City of Farmington proposes to amend Section 10-5-5 (C) of the Farmington City Code concerning the inclusion of an Interim Use Permit for a soil pulverizing operation in the A-I zoning district. Friedges, Inc., 9380 W. 202nd Street, Lakeville, Minnesota has applied for an Interim Use Permit for a soil pulverizing operation at the Wurdeman mining pit located at 5827 210th Street West requiring the need for a ordinance amendment to allow for an Interim Use within the A-I zoning district. DISCUSSION In Section 10-5-5 of the Farmington City Code, the A-I zoning district currently allows mineral extraction as a conditional use, however, a soil pulverizing operation is not a permitted use in this district (see attached). Therefore, the applicant has requested that the soil pulverizing operation be allowed as an Interim Use in the A-I zone district and provided for in Section 10-5-5 (C). On April 9, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended approval by the City Council of the Interim Use Permit in the A-I zoning district. The Planning Commission also recommended approval by the City Council of the Friedges Inc. application for a soil pulverizing operation under the Interim Use. History of the Soil Pulverizing Operation Friedges, Inc. was conducting the soil pulverizing operation in 2001. On October 30, 2001, the City reviewed the mining pit site after a renewal application for the mining operation was submitted to the City. At that time, the City determined that the soil pulverizing operation was being conducted at the mining pit site. A letter was sent to Friedges, Inc. on December 3, 2001 (see attached), stating that the soil pulverizing operation needed to be defined to determine if soil was being hauled to the 799 mining pit instead of being mined on-site. Friedges, Inc. responded in a letter dated December 11, 2001 that they imported several thousand yards of topsoil to the site to reclaim the pit, however, a stockpile of the soil imported was being used in a pulverizing operation and mixed with mined material (sand) and then exported (see attached). The operation consists of pulverizing black soil to a fine consistency and mixing the soil with sand mined from the pit. After the mixing process is completed, trucks remove the mixed soil to building locations off-site. The mixed soil is used for sod applications and other building requirements. Section 3-22-14 (E) states that where practical, stockpiles of overburden and materials shall be used to screen the extraction. The side slopes of such stockpiles shall not exceed three to one (3: 1). Overburden is defined as "those materials which lie between the surface of the earth and material deposit to be extracted." Section 3-22-2 defines mining or excavation as the following: A. Any excavation made by the removal of the natural surface of the earth, whether sod, dirt, soil, sand, gravel stone, or other matter, creating depression or depressions. B. Any area where the topsoil or overburden has been removed for the purpose of mining earthly deposits or minerals, yet the area has remained idle since the topsoil removal. C. Any area that is being used for stockpiling, storage, and processing of sand, gravel, black dirt, clay and other materials. Therefore, the City determined that the soil pulverizing operation was a violation of the City Code because material was being hauled to the mining pit rather than utilizing material within the pit. The operation was shut down until Friedges, Inc. applied for an Interim Use Permit to continue the soil pulverizing operation. Friedges, Inc. submitted a letter to the City on December 12,2001 stating that they agreed to cease soil pulverizing operations until approval by the City was granted through an Interim Use Permit. Interim Use Permit The City Code requires the following items to be met in order for the Interim Use Permit to be granted: 10-3-7: INTERIM USES: (A) The Board of Adjustment may grant permission and set conditions for an interim use of property if: 1. The use conforms to the zomng regulations, performance standards and other requirements; 2. The use meets the standards of a conditional use permit set forth in Section 10-3-5 of the City Code; 3. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty; 4. The use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future; and ~OC' 5. The use will be subjected to, by agreement with the owner, any conditions that the City has deemed appropriate for permission of the use, including a condition that the owner will provide an appropriate financial surety to cover the cost of removing the interim use and an interim structure upon the expiration of the interim use permit. (B) Termination: An interim use permit shall terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events, whichever occurs first: 1. the date stated in the permit, or 2. a violation of conditions under which the permit was issued; or 3. a change in the City's zoning regulations which renders the use nonconforming as provided in Section 10-4-2; or 4. redevelopment of the use and property upon which it is located to a permitted or conditional use as allowed within the respective zoning districts. (C) Application, Public Hearing, Notice: The application, public hearing, and public notice requirements for interim use permits before the Board of Adjustments shall be the same as those for zoning amendments as provided for in Section 10-3-11 of the City Code. Friedges, Inc requests that their application for the soil pulverizing operation under an Interim Use Permit be granted to allow the hauling of soil to the mining site by tandem trucks and mixing the soil with sand mined from the pit. After the mixing process is completed, tandem trucks would remove the mixed soil to building locations off-site. Soil will also be transported to the mining pit to assist with restoration of the pit. Friedges, Inc. will be required to submit a restoration plan in the future in anticipation ofthe mining pit closure. Friedges, Inc. requests that an Interim Use Permit be granted for 1 year for the soil pulverizing operation to April 9, 2003. The operation will be conducted on approximately 1 acre of the Wurdeman mining pit site. Hours of operation will be Monday through Saturday from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM and will coincide with the mining pit hours of operation. Staff has recommended the following conditions be applied to the approval of the Interim Use Permit: 1. Fairgreen Avenue and 210th Street is to be maintained in a drivable state with the addition of Class 5 and grading when applicable. 2. CSAH 50 is to be maintained with a clean driving surface and any debris or soil/gravel be removed immediately. 3. Dust controls be utilized during the frequent hauling of material on Fairgreen Avenue and 210th Street. ACTION REQUESTED Consider approval of the following: 15'"0/ 1. An ordinance amendment to Section 10-5-5 (C) in the Farmington City Code to include an Interim Use Permit for a soil pulverizing operation in the A-I zoning district. 2. The application by Friedges Inc. to manage a soil pulverizing operation at the Wurdeman mining pit located at 5827 210th Street West contingent upon the following conditions: a. The termination date for the Interim Use Permit is April 9, 2003. b. The hours for the pulverizing operation are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. c. Fairgreen Avenue and 2IOth Street is to be maintained in a drivable state with the addition of Class 5 and grading when applicable. d. CSAH 50 is to be maintained with a clean driving surface and any debris or soil/gravel be removed immediately. e. Dust controls be utilized during the frequent hauling of material on Fairgreen Avenue and 210th Street. Respectfully Submitted, /J// f1, /2 (/[ -ce J;#~t:( Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator cc: Todd Brennan, Friedges, Inc., 9380 W. 202nd Street, Lakeville, Minnesota CCOc;{ CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 CHAPTER 5 OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE CONCERNING A-I AGRICULTURE, INTERIM USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 10-5-5 (C) ofthe Farmington City Code is amended to add the following: 4. Interim Use a. Soil Pulverizing Operation SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED this _day of Farmington. , 2002, by the City Council of the City of CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald Ristow, Mayor ATTEST: By: City Administrator SEAL By: City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2002. <\?o -3 SUBJECT PROPERTY \).>'v N W*. S \. . . ~ .' . \ ....." ... , '. .':'.. . ..........,. ~......::...-::.....: " ...;i~}: 'r' ~~:.~' :r."".-..:- \ \ D ---. ....-:--/. <60'1 . '.. .-.----..-.....-----..... .-.....:--.-. 10-5-5: A-I AGRICULTURE (A) Purpose. The Agriculture District is intended to preserve the City's agricultural uses in order to protect farms u~til :1t least 2020, to maintain the City's small town character and to create an urban reserve for such time when there is a need for additional urban development and public utilities may be extended. (B) Bulk and Density Standards. 1. Minimum Standards Lot Area . 40 acres Lot Width 150 feet Front Yard Setback 50 feet Side Yard Setback 20 feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet Height (max.) 35 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 2. Accessory Structure Standards Front Yard Setback 50 feet Side Yard Setback: 100 feet Rear Yard Setback 100 feet * All standards are minimum requirements unless noted 3. Additional Accessory Use Standards a. Feedlots, fenced runs, pens and similar intensively used facilities for animal raising and care shall not be located within three hundred feet (300') of a neighboring property. b. Roadside stands used exclusively for the sale of locally grown agricultural products shall be permitted if: (i) They are erected at least fifty feet (50') from the nearest edge of roadway surface (ii) Parking space is provided off the road right of way ~ (C) Uses 1. Permitted a. Agriculture b. Day Care Facilities, In-home c. Dwellings, Single Family d. Greenhouses and Nurseries, Commercial e. Public Parks and Playgrounds f. Recreational Vehicle Storage Facilities g. Seasonal Produce Stands h. Specialized Animal Raising Facilities 1. Truck Gardening 2. Conditional a. Accessory Apartment b. Agricultural Services c. Cemeteries d. Churches e. Commercial and Recreational Uses f. Equipment Maintenance and Storage Facilities g. Feedlots h. Golf Courses 1. Kennels j. Mineral Extraction k. Public and Parochial Schools 1. Public Buildings and Facilities m. Public Utility Buildings n. Stables and Riding Academies o. Towers 1. Accessory a. Accessory Structures b. Home Occupations c. Solar Energy Systems ~~ ,.--.-"------ -- ~.-- . - ,----,-,-.--.-.-" , ---.--,-' ,.." . . . . '. 3-22-1 'SECTION: 3-22- 1: 3-22- 2: 3-22- 3: 3-22- 4: 3-22- 5: 3-22- 6: 3-22- 7: 3-22- 8: 3-22- 9: 3-22-10: 3-22-11 : 3-22-12: 3-22-13: 3-22-14: 3-22-15: 3-22-16: 3-22-2 CHAPTER 22 EXCAVATIONS AND MINING Purpose and Intent Definitions Permit Required Exemptions From Permit Requirements Applications for Permits; Procedures. Contents of Applications Council Review and Approval of Overall Plan; Function of Renewable Annual Permits Termination of Permit Annual Permits; Renewal; Conditions Issuance of Permit Imposes No Liability on City and Relieves the Permittee of No Responsibilities. etc. Fees Performance Bond or Irrevocable Letter of Credit Standards - Extraction Site Location Fencing Appearance and Screening at the Extraction Site Operations; Noise; Hours; Explosives; Dust; Water Pollution; Topsoil Preservation Rehabilitation Standards 3-22-1: PURPOSES AND INTENT: The purpose of this Ordinance is to promote the health, safety and welfare of the community and to establish reasonable uniform limitations. standards. safeguards and controls for excavation and mining within the City. 3-22-2: DEFINITIONS: The following words, terms and phrases shall have the following meanings respectively ascribed to them: A. Any excavation made by the removal of the natural surface of the earth, whether sod. dirt, soil. sand, gravel, stone. or other matter, creating a depression or depressions. MINE or EXCAVATION: These provisions previously supplemented 772:480:883:584:686:789:891 1092 City of Farmington ~o/ 3-22-4 3-22-5 ':'--"-. is integral to construction or maintenance of roads, highways or utilities. (D) Curb cuts, utility hookups or street openings for which another permit has been issued by the City. (E) Excavation of less than one thousand (1,000) cubic yards in a calendar year. (F) Excavation of less than one hundred (100) square feet of surface area in a calendar year. (G) Excavation or grading for agricultural purposes. (H) Excavation or grading in accordance with development contract approved under the City's Subdivision Ordinance. If the development contract requires that a letter of credit or other security be posted, the letter of credit or other security must be posted before any excavation takes place. (Ord. 092-278, 8-3-1992) (I) Excavation or grading authorized by the Public Works Director following preliminary plat approval under the City's Subdivision Ordinance and prior to final plat approval, provided the excavation and grading activities are consistent with plans submitted and approved by the Public Works Director, the applicant has paid the applicable fees and provided adequate surety in an amount and form approved by the Director of Public Works, and the applicant complies with any other reasonable conditions imposed by the Public Works Director. The developer of a plat assumes all risk involved with grading a site before final plat and street and utility plan approval. Any changes to the grading of a site including any corresponding costs necessitated by the resolution of any design issues identified during the approval process of the final plat and street and utility construction plans, are the sole responsibility of the developer. (Ord. 099-437, 9-20-1999) 3-22-5: . APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS; PROCEDURES, CON- TENTS OF APPLICATIONS: (A) An application for a mine or excavation permit shall be processed in accordance with the same procedures and requirements specified in this Code relating to conditional use permits. However, the hearing shall be held by the City Council following a review and recommendation from the Planning Commission. All applications .'~ ':.~::-... ...~ 1299 City of Farmington <i?~ _ _...____....___._ ..."4...._.._._ . .. - . . .. - 3-22-5 .~, -. ......-.. .", 3-22-5 (a) The contour of land prior to excavation, if available, after completion of excavation and after complet'ion of rehabilitation; (b) Those areas of the site to be used for storage of topsoil and overburden; (c) A schedule setting forth the timetable for excavation of land lying within the extraction facility; (d) A timetable for the rehabilitation of land lying within the excavation facility shall be submitted to the City well in advance of the completion of excavation activities; (e) The slope of all slopes after rehabilitation, based upon proposed land uses, and description' of the type and quantity of plantings where revegetation is to be conducted; and (f) The criteria and standards to be used to achieve final rehabilitation as well as intermittent stabilization. 11. A statement identifying the applicant's program to ensure compliance with the permit conditions, method of response to complaints and resolving conflicts that may arise as a result of complaints. (Ord. 092-278, 8-3-1992) 1299 City of Farmington "l5"09 - ---~... --- :""..."-:........~.~.-,....~. :,,:,.:...:..:..--::.:.-;:;...;.~:::.:;_.,--~-::-._--_.._-.~:__...- ~ - .. . -...... - -. - .....~ _. ---.- ---. -.... - .-.... .,...-..-------.. . .-. ..-.... ..0 . 3-22-6 3-22-8 3-22-6: COUNCIL REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF OVERALL PLAN; FUNCTION OF RENEWABLE ANNUAL PERMITS: (A) A public hearing shall be held before the Council on each permit application. Notice of the hearing shall be published by the Clerk at least ten (10) days before the hearing. The City Council shall review the permit application and shall approve the permit if it is in compliance with this Chapter, the City's Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations. The Council may attach conditions to the permit approval to promote safety and prevent nuisance conditions. The rehabilitation plan shall only be approved if it is consistent with the uses allowed in the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. (B) Implementation of the overall plan shall be by means of renewable annual permit. The purpose of the renewable permit is to assure compliance with the longer range overall plan and to retain the ability to modify existing or to attach new conditions in accordance with changing characteristics of the site or its surroundings. The City Administrator, after consultation with appropriate City staff, may issue renewal licenses upon satisfactory proof of compliance with this Chapter. If the City Administrator denies a renewal license, the applicant may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after the City Administrator denies the permit. 3-22-7: TERMINATION OF PERMIT: (A) The material excavation permit may be terminated for violation of this Chapter or any conditions of the permit. No permit may be terminated until the City Council has held a public hearing to determine whether the permit shall be terminated, at which time the operator shall be afforded an opportunitY to contest the termination. The City Council may establish certain conditions, which if not complied with, will result in immediate suspension of operations until the public hearing to consider termination of the permit can be held. (B) It shall be unlawful to conduct mineral. extraction or excavation after a permit has been terminated. 3-22-8: ANNUAL PERMITS; RENEWAL; CONDITIONS: (A) Application for renewal of an annual permit shall be made sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date. If application for renewal is not 1092 Ci.ty 0; Farmington <=0/0 ._.....-,~.,.-..-,_._- .-...--....- ...-. .._~ .'., ....,.-,.......~-_.~.. ..-....-~-~-~ 3-22-11 3-22-14 property or easements. if any, to the City and to comply with such conditions as may have been established by the City Council. Such agreement shall be accompanied by bond with surety or condition acceptable to the City Administrator in the amount of the established costs of complying with the agreement. The aforesaid agreement. bond or letter of credit shall be provided for guaranteeing completion and compliance with the conditions set forth in the permit within the time to be approved by the City Council. The adequacy, conditions and acceptability or any bond or letter of credit hereunder shall be determined by the City Administrator. The adequacy of the bond or letter of credit shall be reviewed annually by the City. The City may direct the amount of the bond or letter of credit be increased to reflect inflation or changed conditions. 3-22-12: STANDARDS - EXTRACTION SITE LOCATION: Operations permitted under this Chapter shall not be conducted within: (A) Fifty feet (50') of an existing street or highway; (B) Thirty feet (30') of the right of way of an existing public utility; (C) Fifty feet (50') of the boundary of any zone where such operations are not permitted; or (D) Thirty feet (30') of the boundary of an adjoining property not in mining use; or as directed by the City Council. 3-22-13: FENCING: During operations which have received a permit under this Chapter, any area where collections of water are one and one-half feet (1'/2') in depth or mare. or where excavation .slopes are steeper than one foot vertical to one and one-half feet horizontal (1: 1'/2)' and any other areas where obvious danger to the public exists, shall be fenced when such a situation has existed or will exist for a period of five (5) working days or longer. The City Engineer shall review such fencing to assure its adequacy. He may waive this requirement or require additional measures based on his judgment and the characteristics of the particular instances. As an alternative, the City Engineer may require perimeter fencing of the entire extraction site. 3-22-14: APPEARANCE AND SCREENING AT THE EXTRACTION SITE: The following standards are required at the extraction site of any operation permitted under this Chapter: - 1092 City of Farmington 'is/I 3-22-15 3-22-16 D) waste products or process residue shall be deposited in any lake. stream or natural drainage system. All waste water shall pass . through a sediment basin before drainage into a stream. (E) All topsoil shall be retained at the site until complete rehabilitation of the site has taken place according to the rehabilitation plan. (F) Operators shall use all practical means to reduce the amount of dust. smoke and fumes caused by the operations. 3-22-16: REHABILITATION STANDARDS: The following rehabilitation standards shall apply to the site of any operation permitted under this Chapter. (A) Rehabilitation shall be a continuing operation occurring as quickly as possible. after the extraction operation has moved sufficiently into another part of the extrac ~n site. . (B) All banks and slopes shall be left in accordance with the rehabili- tation plan submitted with the permit application. (C) Slopes, graded areas and backfill areas shall be surfaced with adequate topsoil to secure and hold ground cover. Such ground cover shall be tended as necessary until it is self-sustained. -.. ( (D) All water areas resulting from excavation shall be eliminated upon rehabilitation of the site. In unique instances where the City Council has reviewed proposals for water bodies at the time of approval of the overall plan and has determined that such would be appropriate as an open space or recreational amenity in subsequent reuse of the site, water bodies may be permitted. (E) No part of the rehabilitation area which is planned for uses other than open space or agriculture shall be at an elevation lower than the minimum required for connection to a sanitary or storm sewer. (Ord. 092-278, 8-3-92) _.....~ .". ~.. .."., ~ 1092 City or' Farmington . .<)(14.___ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us December 3,2001 Mr. Lew Wurdeman 5827 W. 210th Street Farmington,MN 55024 RE: Mineral Extraction Permit for Lew Wurdeman Property Dear Mr. Wurdeman: The City has recently reviewed your .lpplication for an Excavation, Grading and Mineral Extraction Permit for the period between October 18, 2001 to October 18, 2002. City staff visited the site on October 30, 2001 and discovered a number of violations pertaining to the Excavation, Grading and Mineral Extraction operation. Therefore, the City will not grant approval of the extension of your Excavation, Grading and Mineral Extraction Permit. A Conditional Use Permit is required when re-applying for a permit upon compliance of the following code violations. Section 3 Chapter 22 of the City Code is attached outlining the requirements of the excavation and mining operation. The following are violations of the City Code: 1. Section 3-22-14 (B) Abandoned machinery, inoperable equipment and rubbish shall be removed from the site regularly. Review comments: As shown on photos labeled #1-3, rubbish has been stored on the site including a steel shoring box, steel I-beams, rebar and other construction related items. 2. Section 3-22-14 (E) Where practical, stockpiles of overburden and materials shall be used to screen the extraction. The side slopes of such stockpiles shall not exceed three to one (3: 1). Review comments: Overburden is defmed as ..those materials which lie between the. surface of the earth and material deposit to be extracted." The stockpiles existing on the site do not contain overburden materials. There are two stockpiles on the property that consist of sand and black dirt. The City is concerned that the stockpile oL tack dirt is being hauled to the Wurdeman property and a sifting operation is being performed rather than gaining the black dirt material on-site in an excavation and mining operation. The City requests that the sifting operation be defined to determine if this material is being mined on-site. In a letter dated January 3, 2000 from Todd Brennan of Friedges, Inc. (see attached), it was stated that topsoil would occasionally be back hauled to assist in the future restoration of the mining pit. Additionally, the letter stated that the intention of the Wurdeman Pit was to extract fill (sand) to bring to ~/3 projects in the area. The City also requests that these operations be defined to determine if these operations are being performed. 3. Section 3-22-2- Mine or Excavation: The mine or excavation definition includes the following: A. Any excavation made by the removal of the natural surface of the earth, whether sod, dirt, soil, sand, gravel stone, or other matter, creating depression or depressions. B. Any area where the topsoil or overburden has been removed for the purpose of mining earthly deposits or minerals, yet the area has remained idle since the topsoil removal. C. Any area that is being used for stockpiling, storage, and processing of sand, gravel, black dirt, clay and other materials. Review comments: The Excavation and Mining Chapter of the City Code does not address the allowance of a construction landfill. Because this is not addressed in a mining operation, the construction landfill is illegal. The construction landfill consists of concrete, asphalt, concrete block, and concrete and steel piping (see photos labeled #4-7). The City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit on March 6, 2000 upon a positive recommendation from the Planning Commission on February 8, 2000 to allow the continuance of the mining operation after it was detercined that the mining permit had expired because the deadline for the renewable permit was not met. In the Planning Commission minutes dated February 8, 2000, staff informed the Commission that there was concrete stored on the Wurdeman Property from the reconstruction of the C.S.A.H. 50 project. Todd Brennan of Friedges, Inc. stated that they were planning on removing the concrete off-site. The City Council minutes dated March 6, 2000 indicated that the concrete was placed on the Wurdeman property by mistake and it would take 3 to 4 years to gather enough concrete to crush it. Todd Brennan submitted a letter dated February 16, 2000 stating that the concrete that was to be recycled was removed from the Wurdeman property and placed on the Huber property. Upon review of the property by City staff on October 30,2001, it was determined that the concrete not only is once again stored on the Wurdeman property, but the stockpile has been added to considerably, designating the stockpile pile as a construction landfill because of the varying construction materials identified in the stockpile. The above items need to be addressed before any further mining operations may resume. Therefore, the City will not grant approval of the extension of your Excavation, Grading and Mineral Extraction Permit. A Conditional Use Permit is required when re-applying for a permit upon compliance of the previously- mentioned code violations. Please call me if you have any questions concerning the above information at 651463-1820. ~s;~ Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator cc: Friedges, Inc. 9380 W. 202nd Street Lakeville, MN 55044 Ed Shukle, City Administrator Lee Mann, Director of Public Works/City Engineer File ~/<( Dec-11-2001 09:41am From-FRIEDGES + T-950 P.001/001 F-227 ~~ "~r'~Jf~ . I!' ollt; . . ~OOD~[Q)@~@, .INC; AVATlNG.lJTtLITY,<;' I.ANDsc^pr'. CON'ntACTORS 9380'W, 20200 Street . Lakcvillc, MN 55044 . Phone: (952) 469-2996 · PaX: (952) 469-1755 . December 11, 2001 Lee Smick City ofF8rmington . 325 Oak Street" .' . . Fiumingion,!vfN. 55024 Re: Wurdeman Pit Dear Lee: At this ti.rne I am contesting the suspension of operation under article 3-22-7 (A). I . received the st,JSpensionnotic.e on Friday,. Oecember 7, 200 1. '. On Monday, December 10, .' 2001 we met (Dave Sanock~ Lee Sniick, Todd'Brennan) to discuss the. items in question. '.Section 3-22-14 B --Abandoned.Machinery (TrenCh Box, 1 Beam) These. items we.re. removed .on December 7, 2001, as you '. observed on December 10,2001. -Section 3-22-14 E ~ Stockpiles '.' We have imported to the site several thousand yards of topsoil which will' and. is in reclmDation. This partial' stockpile is in fact being pulverized and inixed'With mined material'(sand) and being exported. We did not feel we were in Violation of oUr permit. . This needs further discussion. . . -Section 3-22~2 - Mining There is no concrete/asphalt stockpile on this property. As observed . on December 10, 200 1 j it is on the Huber property. We feel that o~ meeting was pr~ductive to the point that we should be allowed to . commence with mineral extraction from the property except where the' pulver~ of the topsoil stockpile is concerned.' . Please .respond as ~oon as pOssible~ Thank you for your time. .; Todd Brerinan. . TB:Irw ?/5 Dec-13-2001 10:40am From-FRIEDGES ~ ~J~ IF~O~[Q)@~~, INC. + T-969 P.OOI/OOI F-286 -- -- AVAT1NG. u1'Il.ri'Y & I:ANDSCA'!'r. (.:()NTRACTOR~ 93HO W. 202nd $lrCC[ · L:tkevilte. MN 55044 Phone: (952) 469-2996 ~ Fl&JC: (952) 469-:1755 Lee Smick City of Fanning ton 325 Oak Street . Fannington, MN 55024 DEe .' 3 2001 . December 12, 2001 Re: Wurdeman Pit Dear Lee: This letter is a formal requeSt to withdraw our letter dated De.eember 1 I, 2001 regarding the suspension of operation under article 3-22-7 (A) for the Wurdeman Pit. . Friedges, Inc will agree to to do no processing of topsoil until approval' by the City of . Farmington has'been established. . I appreciate your efforts that you have made to remedy this situation. Sincerely, ..' ~.., -p~:' .' > ~ Todd Brennan . TB:lrw <i5/~ /0/ ' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator ~~ ~ FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Amendment - Title 4-6: Demolition Permits DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The Community Development Department is recommending that the City Code be amended to include provisions regarding the issuance of demolition permits. DISCUSSION As cities "mature," and as available land becomes scarcer and/or more expensive, the potential redevelopment of existing residential, commercial and industrial properties receives an ever-increasing amount of attention. Many redevelopment scenarios involve the proposed demolition of existing building and structures. One example would be the possible redevelopment of the HRA-owned property located at the comer of 3rd Street and Spruce Street, which could potentially also involve the acquisition and demolition of the adjacent Blaha Collision Center. The State Building Code and the City's general "police powers" give the City the obligation and the authority to regulate the demolition of buildings in a manner that ensures the health, safety and general welfare of the public. HOwever, the City Code includes very little useful guidance for City staff, property owners, developers or demolition contractors regarding the specific procedures and requirements for the issuance of demolition permits. Attached hereto is a proposed ordinance that would amend Title 4 [Building Regulations] of the City Code by adding a new chapter [Chapter 6] outlining the steps that a property owner or developer would have to follow in order to obtain a demolition permit. Several of the provisions are patterned after demolition ordinances that have worked effectively in the City of Minneapolis. Other provisions are based upon suggestions and input offered by the City Attorney, the Engineering Division, the Building Inspections Division, the Planning Division, the Heritage Preservation Commission's consultant, and others. There are four properties in Farmington that have been formally designated by the City Council as "heritage landmarks" (see attached list). Under Section 2-11-5 of the City Code (attached), a demolition permit for these properties cannot be issued unless a "certificate of appropriateness" has been granted by the City's Heritage Preservation Commission. However, this provision would not apply to any proposed demolition of the three Farmington properties that have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places, or to any proposed demolition of the twelve Farmington properties that the Farmington Heritage Preservation Commission has determined to be eligible for designation as heritage landmarks. COI ") In Minneapolis, the Heritage Preservation Commission [under Section 117.30(d) of the City Code] has the power to unilaterally veto the proposed demolition of any building or structure in the City, without regard to whether or not it has been formally designated as a heritage landmark. Section 4-6-10 of the new ordinance proposed for Farmington does not go that far. It does not give the Farmington Heritage Preservation Commission any new "veto power" over the issuance of demolition permits, nor does it absolutely prohibit the demolition of a property that is on the National Register of Historic Places or a property that has been determined by the Farmington HPC to be eligible for designation as a Farmington heritage landmark. Rather, Section 4-6-10 provides that a demolition permit for any such property will not be released until the City Council has approved whatever redevelopment plan necessitated consideration of the proposed demolition in question. Staff believes that this provision strikes a reasonable balance between the interests of property owners/developers and the interests of those who would prefer to avoid the premature loss of historically significant local landmarks. A public hearing on this topic (preceded by published notice) was held before the Planning Commission at its meeting on April 23rd. No member(s) of the public commented on the proposed Ordinance at that time. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend the proposed Ordinance to the City Council. The Farmington Heritage Preservation Commission [HPC] also considered the proposed Ordinance at its meeting on April 25, 2002. The HPC unanimously voted to recommend the proposed Ordinance to the City Council. ACTION REOUESTED Motion to recommend approval of the proposed Ordinance Amending Title 4 of the City Code By Adding A New Chapter [Chapter 6] Concerning Demolition. / / /~ ~/cg ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 4 OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER [CHAPTER 6] CONCERNING DEMOLITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Title 4 of the Farmington City Code is amended by adding a new Chapter [Chapter 6], which shall read as follows: SECTION: 4-6-1 : 4-6-2: 4-6-3: 4-6-4: 4-6-5: 4-6-6: 4-6-7: 4-6-8: 4-6-9: 4-6-10: 4-6-1: 4-6-2: Permit Required Permit Exceptions Permit Application Requirements Signage Requirements Supervision by Building Official; Stop Work Orders Required Procedures Prevention of Nuisances Financial Security Fee Demolition of Certain Historic Structures PERMIT REQUIRED: Pursuant to the State Building Code, as adopted and enforced by the City, no person shall commence or proceed to wreck, demolish or tear down any building or structure within the city, except as hereinafter provided, without first having obtained a permit from the city's Building Official. Further, no person shall remove or salvage any building fixture(s) from the building or structure to be demolished until the permit required by this chapter has been obtained. PERMIT EXCEPTIONS: . No permit shall be required for the wrecking, demolishing or tearing down of a private shed, garage or freestanding accessory building (except with respect to those located on properties identified in Section 4-6-10). Further, and except as provided elsewhere herein, this chapter shall not apply in cases where partial demolition is necessary in connection with a minor remodeling or altering of an existing building. CO/7 4-6-3: 4-6-4: CO~ PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: The demolition permit application shall be signed by the owner of the property. If the applicant is a person other than the owner of the property, the application shall also be signed by the property owner. In addition to any requirements that may be specified in the State Building Code for demolition permits, the application shall include the following information: (A) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the property owner, the applicant (if different than the property owner), and the demolition contractor. (B) Street address and legal description of the property on which the building or structure in question is located. (C) A separate, written Demolition Plan that includes: 1. The proposed starting and ending dates of the demolition process. 2. The proposed hours of operation of the demolition process. 3. Evidence that the demolition contractor is licensed, bonded and insured. Any applicable policies of insurance shall not contain any "XC" (explosion, collapse) exclusions. 4. Information about the steps that the applicant has taken to identify and dispose of actual or potential contaminants located within the building or structure or on the property in question. 5. A proposed traffic control plan (if the proposed demolition will affect the use of a street, sidewalk or other public right-of-way). 6. Information about the proposed dump site(s) for the demolition debris and the proposed route(s) for transporting demolished material(s) away from the demolition site. 7. Proposed utility disconnection procedure(s). 8. Proposed access control procedures (fencing, security, etc.) 9. A dust control plan. SIGNAGE REQUIRED: Before any demolition work is commenced, and throughout the progress of same until the completion thereof, the permit applicant shall place and maintain in a conspicuous place on the premises a sign not less than three (3) feet by three (3) square, on which shall be posted a statement as to who is conducting the demolition, giving the name and telephone number of the person who is performing the work. 4-6-5: 4-6-6: 4-6-7: 4-6-8: 4-6-9: SUPERVISION BY BUILDING OFFICIAL; STOP WORK ORDERS: All wrecking, demolishing or tearing down of buildings or structures within the city shall be subject to the supervision of the Building Official and to such reasonable restrictions as the Building Official may impose to avoid all preventable hazards to life, property or health. The Building Official may stop the demolition of any building or structure whenever, in the Building Official's judgment, the same is being done in a reckless, careless, unsafe or improper manner, or in violation of any provision(s) of the City Code and/or state law, and may order all persons engaged in the demolition process to stop and desist therefrom until such time as the Building Official determines that the work will be resumed in a manner that is safe and consistent with the requirements of the City Code and/or state law. REQUIRED PROCEDURES: The wrecking, demolishing or tearing down of any building or structure shall be complete and shall include the removal of all foundations, footings and floor slabs. All fixtures and personal property located within the demolished building or structure shall be removed from the site. The person doing the demolition shall remove all steps, stoops, private sidewalks, accessory buildings and hard-surfaced driveways unless such removal is specifically exempted by the Building Official. The excavation remaining after the removal of all demolition debris shall be filled to the level of the surrounding grade with clean, properly compacted granular-type fill material. A topping of soil of a sufficient depth and quality so as to enable groundcover to grow shall be provided. Suitable groundcover shall be provided within sixty (60) days after the completion of the demolition. PREVENTION OF NUISANCES: Each person engaged in the wrecking, demolition or tearing down of any building or structure within the city shall conduct said work in such a manner as not to create a nuisance to persons on public streets or on neighboring property. Materials removed from the structure shall not be permitted to fall into streets, alleys, or adjacent property or otherwise create a nuisance. FINANCIAL SECURITY: The applicant shall, prior to the release of the demolition permit, file with the city a surety bond (or other security acceptable to the city) in an amount determined by the Building Official. The surety bond shall indemnify and hold the city harmless from all damages, judgments, losses, claims, suits or liabilities of any kind arising out of the demolition of the building in question. The surety bond shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the release of the demolition permit. The surety bond shall not be cancelled except upon ten (10) days' written notice to the city. FEE: The demolition permit application fee shall be as established by the City Council in its annual fee resolution, and shall be paid in full prior to the release of the demolition permit. ~c9.1 4-6-10: DEMOLITION OF CERTAIN HISTORIC PROPERTIES: For any property included within one of the following categories, no permit for the wrecking, demolition or tearing down of such property shall be released by the City until the City Council has granted final approval of a redevelopment plan that is conditioned upon the wrecking, demolition or tearing down of such property: (A) Properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places. (B) Properties designated by the City Council as heritage landmarks. (C) Properties determined by the Farmington Heritage Preservation Commission to be eligible for designation as heritage landmarks. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and shall be applicable to all requests for demolition permits that are pending or submitted on or after the effective date of this Ordinance. ADOPTED this Farmington. day of , 2002, by the City Council of the City of CITY OF FARMINGTON BY: Gerald G. Ristow, Mayor ArrEST: COd~ HISTORIC PROPERTIES LIST Properties Listed in the National Register of Historic Places Exchange Bank Building, 344 - 3rd Street Daniel F. ~kin House, 19185 Akin Road Church of the Advent (Episcopal), 412 Oak Street Properties D~signated Farmington Heritage Landmarks Fletcher Building, 345 - 3rd Street Farmington State Bank Building, 320 - 3rd Street Masonic Temple Building, 324-328 - 3rd Street Hamilton Clay House, 621 Oak Street Properties Determined Eligible for Nomination as Heritage Landmarks Lyric Theater, 314 Oak Street S1. Michael's Church (Catholic), 5th and Spruce Old S1. Michael's Church (Catholic), 104 Elm Street House, 408 Oak Street House, 421 Oak Street House, 509 Oak Street House, 520 Oak Street Dr. Rogers House, 521 Oak Street House, 612 Oak Street House, 409 Spruce Street House, 500 Spruce Street Middle Creek Estates Historic Cemetery (Presbyterian Cemetery) q ;2.3 7> COdt./ 2-11-4 2-11-5 (b) That are associated with the lives of persons or groups significant in our past; or (c) That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master builder, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity those components may lack individual distinction; or (d) That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. 2. The singular physical appearance, historic character or aesthetic value of an established or familiar feature of a neighborhood or community within the City. (B) Findings Of Significance: The HPC shall determine if an historic property is eligible for designation as a Farmington heritage landmark and issue a written finding of significance. (C) Council Designation, Hearings: The City Council, upon recommendation of the HPC, may by resolution designate a Farmington heritage landmark. Prior to such designation, the City Council shall hold a public hearing, notice of which shall nave been published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing and mailed notice sent to the owner(s) of the property which is proposed to be designated a heritage landmark and to all owners of property lying adjacent to the historic property. (D) Communication With The Minnesota Historical Society: Prior to designating a Farmington heritage landmark, the City shall forward information concerning the proposed designation to the Minnesota Historical Society for review and comment in accordance with MSA, section 471.193. (E) Designation Of Heritage landmarks On The Zoning Map: The City shall place designated Farmington heritage landmark properties on the Official City Zoning Map. (Ord. 099-422, 2-16-1999) ----- ---........ .----.---.--- 2-11-5: ('//DESIGN REVIEW: "') '-...................- - . .....' .... ._..-~._....._.,..-......~.......---.~ (A) Revi e;-.OT.....Perm its: The HPC' shall review and make recommendations to the City Council concerning the issuance of City 599 City of Farmington 2-11-5 2-11-5 permits to do any of the following in relation to a property designated as a Farmington heritage.landmark:.... 3> (i~_~~molition of an historic building or~;~~~~~~~-~) ~-~._...-_.~.~._..---~~..N_.._N....._.._~____..... ._.. . _ _ , .. _., ,_. ~_.._._.__-""'" 2-. Moving an historic buildiii'g:'siri.ict"ure:'-or object. (B) :3> (C) (D) 3. New construction of a principal building or accessory structure. Alterations: The HPC shall determine whether the proposed activity will alter, disturb, deface or materially change the appearance or use of a heritage landmark. The HPC may recommend to the City Council conditions for permit approval that it deems reasonable and appropriate. Certificate Of Appropriateness: No permit will be issued by the City unless a certificate of appropriateness has been granted by the HPC. A copy of the certificate of appropriateness shall be attached to the permit when issued, and a copy filed with the City Building Official. A certificate of appropriateness shall become void twenty four (24) months after issuance unless a City permit has been issued. Development Projects: Every application for a preliminary or final plat, variance or conditional use permit in relation to a significant historic property in the City shall be reviewed by the HPC' and their recommendation shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration in making their recommendation to the City Council. In determining whether or not a project will have an adverse effect upon a significant historic property, the HPC shall consider the following factors: 1. Whether the development will substantially alter the appearance of an historic building, site, structure, object or district so as to remove the features which distinguish the historic property as a heritage landmark; and 2. Whether the use of the property will destroy, disturb or endanger a known or suspected archeological feature. (E) Design Review Standards And Guidelines: The Secretary of the Interior's standards for the treatment of historic properties shall be the required basis for permit review decisions. The City may adopt design review guidelines; in the absence of such guidelines, design review decisions will be based upon the current Secretary of the 599 City of Farmington C::O./25 2-11-5 2-11-7 Interior guidelines for preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction. (F) Outside Technical Advice: The HPC may seek technical advice from outside its members on any design review. (G) ~ppeals: Any party aggrieved by a decision of the HPC shall, within ten (10) days of the HPC's action approving or denying a certificate of appropriateness, have a right to appeal such decision to the City Council. When denying a certificate of appropriateness, the HPC shall advise the permit applicant of their right to file a written notice with the City Administrator requesting City Council review. of the action taken by the HPC. Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Administrator shall transmit one copy to the HPC. (Ord. 099-422, 2-16-1999) 2~11-6: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTY: It shall be a misdemeanor to alter, disturb, deface or materially change the appearance or use of a designated Farmington heritage landmark without a certificate of appropriateness. (Ord. 099-422, 2-16-1999) 2-11-7: REPOSITORY FOR DOCUMENTS: The office of the City Administrator is designated as the repository for all reports, studies, minutes, and other documents produced by the HPC. (Ord. 099-422,2-16-1999) 599 City of Farmington "6'c)~ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us /0. ' ZJ TO: Mayor, Council Members, V~0 City AdministratorP' ( " , FROM: Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Consider Ordinance Amendment - Section 1O-6-4(L): Off-Street Parking- Recreational Vehicles DATE: May 6,2002 INTRODUCTION The City of Farmington proposes to amend Section 10-6-4 (L) of the Farmington City Code concerning the off-street parking of recreational vehicles. DISCUSSION At the October 1, 2001 City Council meeting, several residents within the Limerock Ridge neighborhood requested that the Council consider the adoption of an ordinance controlling the recreational vehicle parking within residential neighborhoods. The Zoning Code defines recreational vehicles in the following manner: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE: Recreational vehicle means any selfpropelled vehicle and any vehicle propelled or drawn by a self-propelled vehicle used for recreational purposes, including but not limited to recreational camping vehicle as defined by MSA 327.14, Subd. 7, boats, and off-highway vehicles such as snowmobiles, trail bike, motorcycles, and other all-terrain vehicles. During the research stage of the amendment process, staff gathered ordinances from several communities (Apple Valley, Maple Grove, St. Louis Park, Savage, Rosemount, and Lakeville) that control off-street storage of recreational vehicles. Attached is a matrix and the ordinances from surrounding communities that have such provisions. The City Council and Planning Commission met at a Joint Workshop on February 20, 2002 to discuss the issue to determine if restrictions should be placed on the parking of recreational vehicles on a residential lot (see attached memo). At the workshop, the City Council and Planning Commission discussed a number of issues including the following: <6'01/ 1. Number of recreational vehicles allowed on a residential lot 2. Size of the recreational vehicle 3. Screening of the recreational vehicle 4. Parking location of the recreational vehicle 5. Type of parking surface for the recreational vehicle Section 10-6-4 (L) of the newly adopted Zoning Code requires that any recreational vehicles parked on residential property for more than 14 days shall be 1) parked in rear or side yard, and 2) registered to the owner or lessee of the property and display a current license. The amendment to Section 10-6-4 (L) proposes the following: 1. Elimination of the "more than 14 days" and "parked in rear or side yard" requirements. 2. Proposed additions to the ordinance include recreational vehicles in the front yard to be parked on a hard-surfaced driveway and not allowed to be parked or stored in front of the principal structure or on public property or within the right-of-way. 3. Additional requirements include the allowance of recreational vehicles to be parked on hard- surface or decorative rock within the side or rear yard of the residential lot. Hard-surfaced parking areas in these locations shall maintain a 5-foot setback from the property line, while the decorative rock parking area may abut the property line. Additional requirements for installing the decorative rock are also included. The City Council reviewed the proposed revisions at its March 19, 2002 workshop and directed staff to present the revisions to the Planning Commission at its next regular meeting after a favorable acceptance of the revisions was recommended by the Council Members. The Planning Commission reviewed the revision on April 9, 2002. The Planning Commission amended the proposed revision to allow for the parking of a vehicle on a City street as stated in Section 9-1-9 that reads as follows: 9-1-9: Parking Limitation: No person shall park a vehicle or permit it to stand upon any street, highway, alley, or public parking within the corporate City limits for a period of time exceeding seventy-two (72) consecutive hours. In addition, between November 1 and April 15 of each calendar year, no person shall park a vehicle or permit it to stand upon any street, highway, alley, or public parking area between the hours of two o'clock (2:00) A.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. or after a two inch (2") or greater snowfall until the streets are plowed curb to curb except as authorized in subsection 9-1-12 (E) of this Chapter concerning temporary parking permits. The Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the ordinance amendment to Section 10-6-4 (L) of the Farmington City Code with the above-mentioned reVISIon. ACTION REQUESTED Consider an ordinance amendment to Section 10-6-4 (L) ofthe Farmington City Code. 1)~9> Respectfully Submitted, fr~~ Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator ~~? CITY OF FARMINGTON DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 CHAPTER 6 OF THE FARMINGTON CITY CODE CONCERNING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FARMINGTON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 10-6-4 of the Farmington City Code is amended to add the following: L. Recreational Vehicle Parking. Recreational vehicles parked on residential property for more Hum. 11 days shall be 1) parked iB rear or side yard, afld 2) registered to the owner or leasee of the property and display a current license and may be parked or stored on the lot as follows: a. In the front yard, provided they are kept on a hard-surfaced driveway. Recreational vehicles may not be parked in front of the principal building on a residential lot. Recreational vehicles may not be parked or stored on public property. Recreational vehicles parked on street right-of-way must comply with Section 9-1-9 of the City Code. b. In the side or rear yard, recreational vehicles shall be parked or stored on asphalt, concrete, or decorative landscape rock. (I) All hard-surfaced parking areas in the side or rear yard shall maintain a 5-foot setback from the side or rear lot lines. (2) All decorative landscape rock parking areas may be located in the side or rear yards abutting the property line. The decorative rock parking areas shall be installed to a depth of four (4") inches and lined with a commercial grade weed preventative mesh under the rock to impede the growth of weeds. No class V (5) rock or gravel is allowed. Edging shall be installed to prevent the rock from spreading from the designated parking area. The designated parking area may not impede the drainage within the side or rear yard utility easements or inhibit access to the easements. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication according to law. C(3CJ ADOPTED this _day of May, 2002, by the City Council of the City of Farmington. CITY OF FARMINGTON By: Gerald Ristow, Mayor ATTEST: By: City Administrator SEAL By: City Attorney Published in the Farmington Independent the _ day of ,2002. ~3) City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members and Planning Commissioners FROM: Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Recreational Vehicle Discussion Workshop DATE: February 20,2002 INTRODUCTION At the October I, 2001 City Council meeting, several residents within the Limerock Ridge neighborhood requested that the Council consider the adoption of an ordinance controlling the storage of recreational vehicle parking within residential neighborhoods (see attached memo). DISCUSSION The City of Farmington currently does not have an ordinance specifically related to the storage of recreational vehicles. The City does have a loosely defined provision that requires all off-street parking areas to be paved. 10-6-8 (A) 2. Any off-street parking lot and driveway shall be graded for proper drainage and surfaced with concrete or bituminous material. This requirement continues to be defined in the Zoning Code that is up for adoption on February 19, 2002. However, the new code defines a recreational vehicle in the following way: RECREATIONAL VEHICLE: Recreational vehicle means any selfpropelled vehicle and any vehicle propelled or drawn by a self-propelled vehicle used for recreational purposes, including but not limited to recreational camping vehicle as defined by MSA 327.14, Subd. 7, boats, and off-highway vehicles such as snowmobiles, trail bike, motorcycles, and other all-terrain vehicles. The attached statute, MSA 327.14, Subd. 7, further defines the type of recreational camping vehicles discussed in the Zoning Code. Please refer to the attached examples showing the storage of recreational vehicles on residential lots in Farmington. Staff has researched several communities (Apple Valley, Maple Grove, S1. Louis Park, Savage, Rosemount, and Lakeville) that control off-street storage of recreational vehicles. Attached is a matrix and ordinances of surrounding communities that have such provisions. '63~ The information from surrounding communities displays a number of options to control the storage of recreational vehicles. The attached ordinances may control the number of recreational vehicles allowed on a residential lot, size of the recreational vehicles, screening of the recreational vehicles, the parking location of the recreational vehicles, and/or the type of parking surface for the recreational vehicles. Number of recreational vehicles allowed on a residential lot The communities researched demonstrate varying restrictions to the number of recreational vehicles allowed to be parked on a residential lot. St. Louis Park and Rosemount do not specify a number of vehicles in their ordinance. Lakeville and Maple Grove allow only 2 licensed and operable recreational vehicles on a residential lot. Savage allows up to 3 recreational vehicles, while Apple Valley allows up to 4 recreational vehicles on a residential lot with the opportunity to obtain an on- site parking permit for 2 additional vehicles. Apple Valley does not specify the type of vehicle. The number of recreational vehicles allowed on a residential lot is typically in direct proportion to the lot size and location of the parked vehicles. The minimum lot size for a single-family residence in Farmington is 6,000 square feet with a minimum lot width of60 feet. Most of these lot sizes occur in the older portion of the City or in Dakota County Estates. These lot sizes are also found in East Farmington, however, the covenant for this subdivision allows the storage of recreational vehicles for 24-hours in any consecutive 7-day period. This lot size severely limits the opportunities to store recreational vehicles on these types of lots. Size of the recreational vehicle Only two of the surveyed communities restrict the parking of recreational vehicles within a residential district by the size of the vehicle. The City of St. Louis Park determines the approved location of a recreational vehicle by the size of the vehicle. They identify three size categories including small RV's (6 ft. high, 22 ft. long, 6,5000 Ibs.), mid-size RV's (between 6 and 8 ft. high, no more than 22 ft. long, 6,500 lbs.), and oversize RV's (8 ft. high, 22 ft. long, 6,500 lbs.). The small RV's may be parked in the back yard, in the garage, or on the portion of the driveway alongside the house; 5 feet from the property line. Mid-size RV's may be parked in the backyard or on the portion of the driveway alongside the house; 5 feet from the property line. Oversize RV's are limited to the backyard only. The City of Savage limits the length of the R V's to 34 feet for storage in the rear side yard or portion of a driveway in a rear or side yard; 5 feet from a property line. Screening of the recreational vehicle St. Louis Park and Savage require the screening of a recreational vehicle when stored on a residential property. St. Louis Park requires a screen for small and oversize RV's. The screen requires landscaping and a fence. Savage requires a 90% opaque screening fence. ~a-3 Parking location of the recreational vehicle Of the communities surveyed, only St. Louis Park, Savage, and Rosemount specify the location ofthe stored recreational vehicles. As stated earlier, St. Louis Park requires small RV's to be parked in the back yard, in the garage, or on the portion of the driveway alongside the house; 5 feet from the property line. Mid-size RV's may be parked in the backyard or on the portion of the driveway alongside the house; 5 feet from the property line. Oversize RV's are limited to the backyard only. All recreational vehicles may not be parked on the street or the portion of the driveway in front of the house line. Savage requires recreational vehicles to be parked in the rear side yard or portion of a driveway in a rear or side yard provided a 5-foot setback from the property line is maintained. Rosemount allows for the storage of recreational vehicles on the side of a residence with a 5-foot setback from the property line and behind the front line of the residence, or in the back yard. No recreational vehicles are allowed to be stored in the front yard or driveway area of a residence. Lakeville allows the storage of recreational vehicles in the front yard on an established driveway. Storage in the front yard is not allowed on public property or street right-of-way. Recreational vehicles may be stored on the side of an attached or detached garage only and may not be located closer than 2 feet from the property line. The RV may not be parked in the side yard abutting the principal building. The RV may be parked in the rear of the lot provided that it is not located closer than 10 feet from the rear lot line, 5 feet from a side lot line, or located in a drainage or utility easement. Type of parking surface for the recreational vehicles. Maple Grove requires a hard surface driveway for the storage of recreational vehicles. Rosemount requires a paved surface such as, concrete, bituminous, or pavers and the surface must be large enough to accommodate the size of the vehicle being stored, not just under the tires of the vehicle. Lakeville requires asphalt, concrete, or crushed decorative rock for the storage of recreational vehicles. St. Louis Park and Savage allow the RV's to be stored on grass; Savage specifying that the grass be mowed regularly and kept free of weeds. Apple Valley does not specify a requirement. ACTION REQUESTED Staff proposes to discuss the above-information to determine the Planning Commission and City Council's views on the various options for the possible restriction of stored recreational vehicles on residential lots. ;Zlr~ Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator 9;3<{ City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members and Planning Commissioners FROM: Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Recreational Vehicle Parking Ordinance DATE: March 4, 2002 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION Attached is a draft of the Recreational Vehicle Parking Ordinance generated from discussions by the City Council and Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 workshop. The attached information shows the possible location of the draft ordinance in the newly adopted zoning code. From the workshop, the following items were proposed to be included in the draft ordinance: 1. Allowance for parking recreational vehicles on decorative rock in the side or rear yards abutting the property line as long as the rock does not impede the drainage or inhibit access to the drainage and utility easements. 2. No class 5 rock allowed. 3. Require a fabric installed under the decorative rock to impede the growth of weeds. 4. Prohibit the parking of recreational vehicles in the front of the house. As witnessed in the attached draft ordinance, all of the above-requirements were included. Staff included the following requirements: 1. The recreational vehicle shall be registered to the owner or leasee of the property and display a current license. This language was part of the newly adopted zoning code. 2. The recreational vehicle may not be parked on public property or within the street right-of-way. This requirement was included to clearly define the location of the vehicle parking. 3. The decorative rock shall be installed to depth of 4 inches. This insures that sufficient ground coverage is achieved to prevent mud and erosion. 4. Edging shall be installed to prevent the rock from spreading. This insures that the rock doesn't spread to neighboring properties because the parking area is allowed to abut the property line. ~35 ACTION REQUESTED Please review the attached draft ordinance and submit any comments to staff. R~YS:::e Lee Smick, AICP Planning Coordinator <=6 8~ 0) c :52 ~ ro CL Q) o~ .c Q) > ro c o :;:; ro Q) ~ lJ Q) 0:::: q> . a:; lJ C o t) en Q) ;e C :J E E o t) ; .; ~i - o >- Q) c:: :J CJ) ell Q) ,5 Qi "C oS Cl C'- 'E o > a:: U Q::: 'u Q) 0- en "C Q) c:: o N ~ ~ 'E Q) "C Ow Q) .... c:: o Q) "C Ow 'S o e iii Q)~ .r; U ~i c:: > CIl- "C CIl Q) 5 o:=: c;;:g o CIl "C-- Q)~ ..:.:: 0 ~~ Q) 0 ..0 -- >"C ctI Q) E .5 _ ctI .2 :c ~ 0 0lQ) c::..o == > Q) ctI 3: E "C_ Qj 'E O-Qj ell c. ~ Ol :E~ ~ ili --0- ~.! :s .~ .E 6 c:: c:: ~<( Q) >- ....1:: o Q) E 0- o 0 Z C. o z iii Q) U :E Q) > iij c:: .2 iii Q) .... U Q) .... Q) ::c ctI .... Q) c. o "C c:: ctI "C Q) ell c:: Q) ,g s: o 3: .- .... o - -gO) CIl~ ~Il) U c:: c:: CIl ~= ti Ii :i ~ ~u 8.~ e c:: O-B E"C o Q) ':::0- _ CIl Q) U ~,'g Il) c:: . ctI "C-:: ili 0 >"C .... Q) CIl U Q) c:: .... Q) ep- =~ .5 'E' "C CIl Q) > ..:.:: .... .... ctI CIl Q) 0..... Q) Q) ..0= en .S ~"C E Q) ell":':: Q) ili u 0- :E Q) Q)..o >u; U ::l ~ E ell ~> 'w a:: "C _ ~iij "C E c::en CIl Q)-o N CD Ow c:: .... CD CD Q) > t; o en Q) E "CO "C'O 'w .::: "C Ql ... 3: c:: ~ ~ OQlCll O-'w ili '> ,'g c:: 0) eQi~ oe CIla;:: ~ .5-;'0 O~ ~~ep u;:i ~E: ~> >ea u;1:: ';:-CD ~Ql "Coo..:.:: ::ag- ~ ~ ,~ C. O~Ql 8E c::t;~ 50 ,2 ell 0. - .::: 1:: c:: ell :2-Ql OQl"C ell CL..c:c: e~ o::ct1 lUll) "Ca~ 'O~ ili ~ji >Ql > x - CIl- Ql Ql Ol 3: iii :2'0 c:: ~..:.:: ell ~ '~ ';: U ili oa; e "C ~ e'E U oa; Ql'a;eIl "Cell =E~ ili'O ~.~ [ ~~ Q)~o ou i: .5 ~ ~ a3 [~~ = ~ ~ Ql IU ,5 e _0.>, '- ~e..o -go CD 0- > C5 ,_~ >E1:: u; iij e 8. Ql 'E c::--o ..00 .2 13 a. - ~ mm- 0"0 Q)..oC:: C::c:: u03B ~:2 e ~.!!!" E ~ Mg~ ~"C -;~ 0 ~ ~ Ql > > '~~ '-~ca .- =ctI3:~-cQ) ffi-c'E..!!! ffi~ .r;Q),::lellCll _"O:E 0_ E e'~o~e ~ o........,o..oai EO-uQ) .U -0 'E :5 ~ .eIl .{g z~5.E~~ en w >- en w >- CD .... is. g' :g ~CaQ)o CD Ol..o U ~~o~ eIl.c;C::11l ::::l U = > E.!!!~(;j "E~U)~ III ... 'S E >0..0 c-c~e eJlg:: ~ U .... III . ~ ~.! 0l11l'- 0 .5 C) co ~ ~ .S C5 -g E3~11l 1Il..o-c-c -c11l-clii 'iii -c CD > ~Ci~~ . 0 > ::::l._ ~ >.cut:;cn ..Q t::9....E 'iij IIlCl)Oo CI) 8- ..!! J:: ~ c.~ e a; u cCDU-S! CIl o c.o g", ~"'O U ~ c....; ~ .9~~Uj <II CD 0. ::::l c: C <II E CD ~ ctI CD EO.c;Ol o.~;:: III ':; .~ ~ C5 g~~ en "O>u"O aiC5~~ - ::::l U) c:: U') '- > III CDg: o:::E..oo::: CD .9- u; _::::l::::l- i6 i E :ii Qj CD III E o..c; CD CD di ~ ~ ~ ~ -S! co. CD o ~~~.~ ~ 3l'~~'"5 ai Q) ~1Il-;-g~ C5 ,~ >. "0 III > u; :::.. ~ 'ijj 2!.. t::CD Q) ~ 5i E iii' 0. ..c o.~ e c: e Ui ~ -c ~ .~ Co ~ aial1!~!3 Q) =~N~= g ~::c -;;-'3 lB ~ ~~~al; 'w -0 ~-g~~ e ZOl1l0.0 -c .... CIl > .... CIl Q) .... .... o OJ ~ > 1:: Q) 0- o ... 0. E o .::: en w >- en w >- en w >- ..:.:: > ep .... ~ > CIl 'E e a.. iij ell ~ ~ Cl 0 > Os CD E Q) CD 0 Ol '> c. c. -l CIl Q) Q) .2:- > en ..:.:: 0. CIl U5 IU 0 CIl t5 <( ::a en a:: -l ~3/ City of Apple Valley Parking Regulations No more than four (4) vehicles per dwelling unit may be parked or stored anywhere outside on residentially zoned property. An on-site parking permit may be obtained for two (2) additional vehicles. On-street parking is prohibited from 3.:00 a.m. through 6:00 a.m. except persons rendering emergency medical assistance; construction areas where off-street parking is not available; or the maximum number of vehicles are parked in the driveway of a residence. Vehicles illegally parked are considered abandoned motor vehicles if: on public property over 72 hours; lacking vital component parts; parked on private property over 72 hours without permission of the property owner; in an inoperable condition, parked on private property over 72 hours.. (unless in a garage); or not properly licensed for a period of 90 days. On-street parking is prohibited during any time snowplowing or snow removal operations are in progress. No parking is permitted within 10 feet ora fIre hydrant or mailbox. <?39; .~xterior Storage-Residential Cicy Ordinances--Cicy of Maple Grove, http://www.cLmaple-grove.mn.us/ce...edlexterior _storage Jes _ codes.hnnl ! . Gcvof C d & . ~Iaple Grove .. 0 es ~...~. . ,.,-.... " .... .~ " - ,. . . '. "...iIl';fit.:J>J.";' "; '.:,',. ,...,."",-., , "-::.:...-! xterior Stora.ge-Residential City Ordinances-Section 375:12, Su New. & Ennta All storage must be within a building except for ~. 2 licensed and operable recreational vehicles . licensed and operable passenger vehicles . construction and landscaping materials currently in use and, . items associated with outdoor residential activities such as lawn furniture cooking equipment, etc. Section 375:12, Subd. 15 I Frequently Asked Q. Progralllll &. Fltcillti_ LiCBI1MB &: Permits City Servica City Info&; Govemmant Setbacks- Residential Setback City Ordinances--City of Maple Grove.http://www.cLmaple-grove.mn.uslcedlcodes _ cedlsetbacks Jes _ codes,hnnl New. & E'I'8nta . Accessory Structures: Section 375:12, Subd. 4(c), _ 5 feet from all property lines and out of utility easements. . Lakeshore Structures: Section 375: 1 08, Subd. 5(b)(1). - 75 feet from the normal high water mark. ~ Hard Surfaced Driveways: Section 375:21, Subd. 4(h)(7). - 5 feet from side yard property lines. Frequently Aaked Qa Programs &: Faci.litiea LieBnus & Permits Cit}. Services City Info &. (im.ernment Public Saiety . Codaa I: OrdinSDcea . I ~..!'anl1 (' M~ple Grove '. lIIimnesob ~SA i' . ---...~ -- ~ ...... ........- ~ .... ~ - TI'I' 'rr1 rr ~ r .., """?" rTT,...,'7'" I-News & Events-+-~-I-ProQrams & Facilities-+-Licen~es & Permits-I I-City Services-i-City Info & Government--I-Public SafetY-i-Codes & Ordlnances-I-Search-I-Home- <1539 St. Louis Park r~ f ! Parking: Recreational Vehicles St. Louis Park city ordinance limits where recreational vehicles can be parked in residential neighborhoods. Recreational vehicles (RV's) include- Travel trailers Campers Motor homes Tent trailers Vans converted to motor homes Boats and boat trailers Snowmobiles and snowmobile trailers All-terrain vehicles and trailers Oversize RV's cannot be parked on the street or driveway. Only one oversize RV can be stored on residential property. It may be parked in the back yard, if it is screened from view with a fence and landscaping, and if it is parked at least five ft. from any property line. An oversize R V is more than 8 ft. high, 22 ft. long or 6,500 lbs. (empty weight). Mid-size RV's cannot be parked on the street or the portion of the driveway in front of the house line. They can be parked in the back yard or on the part of the driveway alongside the house as long they are at least five ft. from any property line. A mid-size RV is between 6 and 8 ft. high, and no more than 22 ft. long or 6,500 lbs. (empty weight). /' \ . Small RV's cannot be parked on the street or the part of the driveway in front of the house line. They can be parked in the back yard, in the garage, or on the portion of the driveway alongside the house as long as they are parked at least five ft. from any property line. If they are screened, they can also be parked on the side yard grass. A small RV is less than 6 ft. high, 22 ft. long and 6,500 lbs. (empty weight). RV's can be parked on the driveway - not the street - for up to 48 hours for loading, unloading or routine maintenance. <=is </0 "."'."1"". i f Ci+'J""o.}- Sau"-]e:. PEDDLERS AND SOLICITATION Section 3 Chapter 3 of the Savage City Code Applications and questions regarding licensing may be directed to the Savage City Clerk at 952-882-2660. Enforcement concerns may be directed to the Savage Police Department or Code Enforcement Officer. License Required: It is unlawful for any peddler or transient merchant to engage in any such activity within the City without first having secured a licensed from the City. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING Chapter 12 of the Savage Zoning Ordinance 9-12-13 Parking areas Restrictions for open parking: Not more than three (3) recreational vehicles as . defined in the ordinance may be parked, provided such vehicles are immediately operable, without need of repair and currently licensed, as follows: In a rear side yard or portion of a driveway in a rear or side yard provided a five-foot setback from property lines is maintained except when screened from eye level view from public right-of-way or adjacent property by a 90% opaque screening fence and provided that the parking space is kept free of weeds and mowed regularly. During periods of seasonal use, completely on an established driveway within the required building setback/provided the vehicle is kept entirely on the vehicle owner's property, does not obstruct the public sidewalk, does not by any part enter or protrude into the public right of way, and that the total number of RVs on driveways is limited to two (2). . Period of Seasonal Use: Means the following: Snowmobiles and snowmobile trailers, from November 1 to April 1 of each year Boats and water related recreational vehicles, from April 1 to December 1 of each year. All other recreational vehicles, year around. *Recreational vehicles parked outside of an enclosed building within a residential zoning district may not exceed thirty-four (34") in length. There are exceptions to.this, please refer to the entire ordinance. * Questions or complaints may be directed to the Savage Police Department Code Enforcement Officer at 952-882-2693. SIGN REGULATIONS Chapter 13 of the Savage Zoning Ordinance This chapter is very extensive and detailed, below are the more common restrictions that apply: . Home occupations (including licensed daycares) are allowed one non-illuminated sign each not exceeding two (2) square feet in area placed flat against the building. No off premise advertising is allowed. . Real estate signs (e.g., homes for sale, lease, or rent) must be located solely on the advertised property. No off-premise signage is allowed. . Open house signs are only allowed on the day of the open house. They must be on private property, with permission. . Model home signs are'treated the same as Real Estate signs (e.g., homes for sale, lease, or rent). They must be located solely on the advertised property or advertised as part of a development sign. 9;4/ City of Rosemount Code Enforcement 2875 14Sth St. \V , .. . Rosemo~tin{Mr\l:5S068 . . '\ ~ ....... . " . .. . .~ .;.~ Recreational Vehicle and Trailer Storage Guidelines · This guide is intende4 to explain the requirements for RV storage in the residential and agricultural zoning districts of the city. Recreational vehicles may be stored outdoors in the Agricultural or Residential zoning districts of the city. Any RV's in commercial" . . zoning districts must be storeq inside a building. . All parking must be on a paved surface such as, concrete, bituminous, or pavers. The parking surface must be large enough to accommodate the size of the vehicle being stored, not just under the tires of the vehicle, the same as your driveway. . Before installing any parking surface, submit a drawing for your site with measurements to the planning or engineering divisions for review. Pennits are not routinely required for . driveways, but in some instances may be necessary. City staff can also advise you of any other conflicts or problems relating to cit}' code to avoid further inconvenience for you. I.e.: maximum paved surface percentage, or curb cut width issues. ~ \ ._i · Recreational Vehicles, boats, and trailers may not be stored in the front yard, or driveway area of a residence. .. R V's may be stored on the side of a residence, behind the front line of the residence. They must be setback 5 feet from the property line between residences. If the R V is being stored on the street side ofa comedot the parking area must be setback 30 feet from the property line. . It is also permissible to park R V's in the rear yard, on a paved surface, if access is available. . There are also utility easement lines to be considered. No parking is allowed on utility easements, except where the permitted main driveway of your home crosses the utility easement near 'the .curb. . If a resident were to pave over a utility easement and repairs to the utilities were necessary there \yould be no reimbursement for damage to the paved' area caused by the repairs. The resident would be required to remove all paving from over the easement area. . See the back of this page for drawings with examples of common R V parking areas. ,For q~esti9ns .co.ntact Code Enfor~ement a~ 6? I ~32~-20~2,. or write ~o the addr~ss aboxe. ... . . ,~. '6'<I~ / .- --.- -. '--.'." .~-~-~ ,- ~ . .--.,- ~ l ; I I I .... CD CD '- .... 'w f .- .. / , \ I ..' ~~ _. -. ~ . . I S' Drain~e Utility E~m~t. NO PARKiNG I . I I ./ CD c ::i >- ~ CD 0. e a. I I I I~ .&J I~ ..... - . , Ii? . )I~ . III Ig . Corner Lot ( 1 V" i ~ . . .- II I c ~I CD 8', Ii: 1 -gl I~ -s, 'I~ ~I" ~ ~ VI 1m I Interior Lot I ~ I I I i I I 1/ I I ./ I . I I I . I I r I J \ I I J J ""- I Curb I --- --L --L --L- Street . ..' . . ~. DePl~t~ ~dd_iti~~~~.l.~~\~~d..~~r~~~e ~or storage ,- N 1 Copyrighl2001. Dakota County - Map Cate: Se~tember 6,2001 <6C/ 3 L~\<.e u~[LL A. Exceptions. ~-~ -,'~ ,Off-street parking of motor vehicles as specified in the respective zoning . . districts. :!' , .Withi~ the I-CBD, 1-1 t and 1-2 Districts semi-tractor trclilers used for normal . freight and cartage in transit for up to cine hundred twenty (120) consecutive days per calendar year. Within the I-CBD, 1-1, and 1-2 Districts, land/sea containers which are in compliance with Sedion 11-22-7 of this Title. B. Outdoor storage within the 1-1, 1-2 and I-CBD Districts shall be an allowed ~ccessory use under the following conditions: . . 1. *' 2. 3. .5. Clothesline pole and wires and play equipment Not more than two (2) licensed and operable recreational vehicles and equipment may be parked or stored on property outside a building as follows: a. In the front yard, provided they are kept on an established driveway, entirely on the equipment or vehicle owners property. Recreational vehicles may not be parked or stored on public property or street . right-of-way. b. In the side yard abutting an attached or detached garage provided recreational vehicles and equipment are not closer than two (2) feet from the side lot line. The area must be surfaced with asphalt. concrete or crushed decorative rock but shall not be placed within . drainage and utility easements unless approved by the Zoning - - Administrator. Parking or storage of recreational vehicles and equipment on the side yard abutting the principal building is prohibited. ~~ c. In the rear yard not closer than ten (10) feet from the rear lot line, five (5) feet from the side lot lines. and not within drainage and utility easements. . -- -.-" On a comer lot not clo~er than twenty (20) feet from the property line abutting the side street and not within drain~ge and utility easements. Construction. and landscaping material currently being used on the p~emises. do}'; 4. ....:~ 6. 1. . The outdoor storage area occupies space other than a required front yard "----j setback or sid~.yard setback area on a comer lot. 22-2 75 '-1'1 Mi,nnesota Statutes 2001,327,14 http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.uslstats/327/14.htmJ Minnesota Statutes 2001. Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 327 327.14 Definitions. Subdivision 1. Terms. For the purposes of sections 327.10, 327.11, 327.14 to 327.28 the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Manufactured home. "Manufactured home" has the meaning specified in section 327.31, subdivision 6. Subd. 3. Manufactured home park. "Manufactured home park" means any site, lot, field or tract of land upon which two or more occupied manufactured homes are located, either free of charge or for compensation, and includes any building, structure, tent, vehicle or enclosure used or intended for use as part of the equipment of the manufactured home park. Subd. 4. Municipality. "Municipality" means any city, town or township in this state, however organized. Subd. 5. Primary license. "Primary license" means the initial license issued to the first person, firm or corporation to establish and maintain, conduct or operate a manufactured home park or recreational camping area at anyone location. Subd. 6. Annual license. "Annual license" mean.s a renewal license issued to the person, firm or corporation operating a previously licensed manufactured home park or recreational camping area. ~ Subd. 7. Recreational camping vehicle. "Recreational '7f' camping vehicle" when used in sections 327.1.4 to 327.28 includes the following: (a) any vehicular, portable structure built on a chassis, designed to be used as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreational, and vacation uses; (b) any structure designed to be mounted on a truck chassis for use as a temporary dwelling for travel, recreation, and vacation; (c) any portable, temporary dwelling to be used for travel, recreation, and vacation, constructed as an integral part of a self-propelled vehicle; and (d) any folding structure, mounted on wheels and designed for travel, recreation, and vacation use. Subd. 8. Recreational camping area. "Recreational camping area" means any area, whether privately or publfcly owned, used on a daily, nightly, weekly, or longer basis for the accommodation of five or more tents or recreational camping vehicles free of charge or for compensation. "Recreational camping area" excludes: (1) children's camps; (2) industrial camps; 'S l./5' lof2 2/12/022:53 PM J".' " , /' f;' ',...c"--'- jr' , /( Lower Heritage Way - Sunnyside Neighborhood ;fain Street Akin Park Estates Lower Heritage Way - Sunnyside Neighborhood Fairview Lane - Sunnyside Neighborhood cc cJ~ Dunbar Ave - Pine Knoll Neighborhood . _/~ , ::~~~; "';"-'i" .;;~~ ;:.<:~'-~~ ,-.:...,,1 ~\~~,:,""\"'f!'". --,?)t\~~~:.~ 1:';:~ Dakota County Estates Pine Knoll Neighborhood Dakota County Estates crs '-I ) "'r,.... N'l''tF''~~'"'' <.,,"'''''.''''~~-~~ i'}; - .:''';;:iJ ! i I I': Dakota County Estates Dakota County Estates Troyhill Neighborhood Dakota County Estates Everest Path - Troyhill Neighborhood '?; C/'i? '" ... .' ~j~: ~' ;';;;'i:;j-;;;f:)~h~~~~~~;t@;~~l;~r~1 i ,;:....:'.(::. ~.. ::1.......::.;':::.:> ,::::.:,>-::::::::.:)~:~;;:., :::C'::::;:;': .::/ .:~.::.~:,?::~~:j.<;: ;;;~.> ~\ . " '.~ ~ . - " '" . . );1" .'::- ." .. :...;.r. . .' ..:.o)~~':'~ ' 'l~ o ..~:~.. ;~..: '..~"~'~".,:'~'_~::: .~:~~~;~:'. .,.,,;.' . "~,,'~'>1"'" .' --""\ :::.; ';'>~~::~;~/~~:':.~:_E::'~.~. .. " ~:. .j/..j ~ ~~?'::7 :.:: ~ :''= . ..C',; i' 1. L , , , I 1 : '. ~. ........ .....:.::..::..:... ..-..... .:....::-......:..<;:J ~ :~.'::., ~ \:~'.::~:~~~~::~:~i~~;i~ii:~;~~~;~:\:j!+~:jt;.~.:.~~:~:!':}::~},::?~.::1 : '.' .. :! '. ",;..' ."':~ . .o' '. ........ ...... ~'.. . '.o .:-..:-....... .... ..:..... . . . .. . . 0... . .' .; ~''''.'. ..--.......:...... . . .: ~~'. ~.<.. ~...:....~..::.:~. :.~..::.:: .. ....... '.. . . ...... . :.:-;...... ..' '.. . .~[ ..: '. ..:..' .::. . .. ~ . .... .'.o : . '.; '.' .0..'" . . ~... . . :: '.' .'.'.o . .., '. ...:.;....:..;...:. :.... . . ..(,. '" ":""""'. I~.. '~"'.c.,_. ~.',""..." ; .... ".:': ~ <;;~,,; . ~'" .'J:~'.~2Jl_ ;':1..'-. ~~:\!, "DeCision to ban trailer " 't'<. _ ,':1. . "./:t."J: .:.,~. '"~". .' . " -~p~P~:;~wouldtake,away "~' ;~;'J~~'r' ;;~~fJ."'r"'e'; 'ed'o' m." : S ,. :::.'~"-~~ ..~(' .'.~:~f~..,~~~t~~. ~:',.J:~~:'. ,... '~t~~ ,:,~y:~'~~~j~'~.,~,:j{it'\~~'~:~' . . ", . J~.;: ,<,::,:::;;':~j<~~l '. . . .' I~'I:O the editor, .':,.: ..... even looking at enacting such ::~';We' ~ave many troops fight-. an' ordinance. Who are we 'ing;.for.our freedoms abroad going to get to enforce this new . : and yef one of our qwn resi- delightful policy? Judging by ... dents is trying to' take one of the numbers of trailers and RV s them.away. I am appalled by the . I see in town, we will have to ';.recent city council meeting in hire another policeman. '-which a gentleman by the name What's next? What color is "of Kevin Buckman brought up the house we all live in? What if the fact that he does not want to the city decides all of the hous- look at campers when he comes es should be white? What if a home from work. In his address resident complains about the . to the members of the city coun- dogs barking far off in the dis- ciI he states, -When I come tance? Then do they pass an hqme, I do~:L'?I.;mt. tp. slee,,15 .. .ordinance. that says we can no campers_"~..li _:'..~ ,d~" 'I'JII/,,,,! ..,i longer-.have aogs?~%at'aboui.:. ". , This is ludicrous,; when will . the 19ds playing b~ke'tbai1'at 9 our freedoms. totally end? Next:.. p.m. and the older couple next they're going to try and ban all door thinks it is too loud? Do we Volkswagen Rabbits, because say no more basketball in the "TIley're just not American." city of Farmington? Then whnt So far the city of Farmington will the kids do? Quite possibly. says that we cannot have stor- something far worse than bas- age sheds in our yard!>, They ketball. limit the sizes of the garages I assure you, if this ordinance that we may build, We have a gets passed, it will lead to more parking ban in place from Nov. just like it. As a resident of 15 through April 15 (even Farmington. I would hope that though it seems the plows never we all do the following: go out- come around during the park- side today and take a walk ing ban times). around your property. Count all Now we may not be able to the things that you park on your park recreational vehicles and lot that could be affected by an trailers in our own yards that ordinance such as this. Count we pay good taxes on. My wife the boats, RVs, ATVs, utility and I own a 2001, 30-foot travel trailers, dirtbikes, snowmobiles, trailer and a homemade trailer dune buggies, car trailers, that I made in high school 13 motorcycles, jet skis, go carts, years ago. This utility trailer is classic muscle cars that you are repainted every year and I am restoring (most people do not very proud of it, yet I may not be know the value of most of these able to park it in my own back vehicles), etc. Count them up. yard. When you get them counted, try What about the many dozens to figure out where you are of residents who own boats and going to park them if the afore- other recreational type vehi- mentioned ordinance gets cles? Will they need to pay for passed. year-round storage? The most appalling thing to me is that the city council is .1\1 Chris Lorenzen, Farmington II Have an opinion 11<6</9 (j()5 '717~ ~ J .. / bJn S.5-0dl.: ( Y(~ J; 1-00 I ~ .J .6JJJ QJu., ~ :to (t~,L..-- ~ :u ~ ~ cf ~ ~,X~, ~.tk~~l>rVr 6Wrv~. W~ ~ :;tc (f (}-rJ ~..duJi ~ fu1- M.J.e, M..- ~ ~ ~);L aJsk.. Ji ~ a-uu ~~07J ~ Owru~. ~ fd-1 ~ .~. ;b~.~~./~ (1e., ~ ~ I ~ h-td-,A/ ~ ~ :tAd ~ ~. ~:to dA ~ ~~~" ~~~ ~.:b,~ ~~ t7-N 30Jv ,m-u--\u ~~ ~ ~ ~ a-,<-<L 'Auf~~ ~~~-fv~ ;t~;dJzkl~~~ ~ ~ f>-turv <:!..-hJ4 ~ o-<A-kA-I P ;;1:Ll1 ~/~ ~ ..Ii. 2UL ~. J , LJL~ A;t iAvmA-~~ ~J ~0/l.I ~ hW :t;:ML d-/ ~~r~Lr~~w~O(tA./~ /)".d>.L~..i4J~, 07) ~~~~~~ .~.J: -h~ ~'lbtuL ~~ 'P ~ ~ - 6j ~~:Lr~ fi.e~1 J-f)~~~~J~1~~.~CMu~~~ ,ir ~;ehuv ~ ~ ~ pr d- ~ '(J~r 0l-<-4 'o.r;/;A.vo 5) ~ ~ ~ ~:J- r ~ ~ a..a.J W--<-. ~~. I.) 'fL.;,.,.-f)~ ~ w ~ ..u.u... ~ ~, -& ~~~~~hF'~r~~' .~~~~.~~~~~'fo~ ~r'.~~~~~~ tl> L'-L~-to~~_~~~ ~::u ~k ~~/lJ~~.~~~ ~1/WN~71ur~~~~hV~~ . ~ h~~~Wi-~=~ ''--~/ (JOJu rn~~ ~~ ~ ~ ()-t.V7V ~~J ~~ ~ ~ r ~~ J;t" ~",~L~. 'Cob ,.,.--- To: From: Date: Subject: Chief Dan Siebenaler Concerned Farmington Citizens September 21,2001 Outdoor Storage Ordinance D rg@rg O\Y1 ~ ;.;.: '. I ' ~ ~ 2' , l' . OCT - I 2001 !!! II 110 As citizens of Farmington we are concerned about the lack of an outdoor Storage Ordinance. Farmington is growing at a fast rate and we feel that the storing of recreational vehicles beside homes is increasing as well. We have called numerous times on one particular house in the Limerock Ridge Development (5151 194th Street), where there are two campers and a hauling trailer parked on the front lawn. Each time we call to complain we are informed there is nothing that can be dorieand are informed that Farmington does not currently have an ordinance restricting/limiting such outdoor storage. Just a couple houses down from the above address is a boat stored in a similar fashion. Without an ordinance proving standards for such storage, this just becomes a ripple effect. We take pride in the appearance of our houses and yards. Such outdoor storing of vehicles brings down the value of our homes, therefore deterring new families from moving into Farmington. We feel there needs to be an ordinance providing standards for and, allowing of, outdoor storage of vehicles/recreational vehicles. Attached is a copy of the City of Lakeville's Outdoor Storage Ordinance which we would like to have be proposed to the City of Farmington for consideration. We appreciate your help in the matter. Concerned Citizens of Farmington, ~ J<:V ~1-i --;}n't-,' ~1 ~;ze1fl11~ d~ c\- jut CJJ- ~~. p/O,-..,J O~ ~~ ~. SYtr1r ~ orum~ cr ~CVl)L --r&W11Y ~ ~ ~~.~~ "* ~ ~ w'V10 'f~f tw t/YrfvloorSftrytt.~ ~u)~ ~sl IOk City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651)463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us TO: r ). Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator of FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consider Resolution - Metropolitan Council Opportunity Grant DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION Each year, the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account makes funds available for "Opportunity Grants" of up to $75,000. Opportunity Grants are designed to help fund local initiatives to develop project-specific and site-specific land use plans that (among other things) "propose a mix of uses, including a mix of housing types and costs, and an economic mix near commercial, civic or other uses that facilitate daily needs and community activities." Eligible uses of funds include "preparation of master plans; market studies to assist in determining retaiVoffice/housing mix and cost; and conducting design workshops and developing design standards." City staff members are currently preparing a draft of an application for an Opportunity Grant. The application focuses on the portion of Farmington bounded on the north by Highway 50, on the east by Denmark Avenue, on the south by 220th Street West, and on the west by the future southerly extension of Pilot Knob Road. There are only four separate property owners within this rectangle, each of whom has previously approached the City to discuss development opportunities. City staff believes that the development of a comprehensive "master plan" for this area would greatly facilitate a logical, orderly, progressive and coordinated approach to the many issues that will arise as the City engages in discussions with owners, prospective developers, adjoining landowners, and other interested parties. Any Opportunity Grant that is awarded must be matched by a 1: 1 "local contribution," which can include City staff time and in-kind contributions. The local match can include some costs that have been expended within twelve months prior to the date of the grant award. The Community Development Department is recommending that the City apply for a grant in an amount not to exceed $40,000. Staff believes, upon preliminary analysis, that the City can satisfy its $40,000 match requirement through "credits" for City staff time (Community Development Director, two Planning Division staff members, Engineering Division staff, etc.), use of City equipment and facilities (GIS software, CAD system, printing of maps and concept plans, etc.), and $15,000 in CDBG funds that have already been committed to a future study of commercial development opportunities in Farmington. Applications are due by May 15,2002. The City's application will have to be accompanied by a City Council resolution authorizing the submission of the application. Attached hereto is a resolution of the type required by the Metropolitan Council, along with some information about last year's grant recipients. "lr6~ ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the proposed Resolution Authorizing Application for an Opportunity Grant through the Livable Communities Demonstration Program. co63 Livable Community Objectives These objectives: · Serve as guiding principles for smart growth development. · Parallel the Regional Blueprint 2030 objectives. but at a community rather than regional level. · Are universally applicable, and flexible to local needs, A version of these objectives has been used to provide direction to applicants for the Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCA) incentive funding program since 1996. They were also used to solicit candidate sites for Smart Growth Twin Cities Opportunity Sites. Livable Community Objective 1: Design for People a. Provide mobility options: transit, walk, bike or drive. b. Use physical layout to ensure that walking, bicycling and using transit are safe and pleasant alternatives to driving. c. Design walkable streets with buildings fronting the street in ways that.favor pedestrians as weli as cars~ d. Provide civic places, urban parks and squares for events and informal gatherings. ~f.' Livable Community Objective 2: Protect and Enhance Natural Resources a. Drain, filter and retain storm water in innovative ways that maximize use of natural rain '.. ., :"', "" . :: garden systems. pamffi 's~~ste!T;~' b. Maximize use of native trees and wildflowers. c. Tap natural resources to create community amenities, such as restoration of buried creeks and wetlands. d. Provide green spaces for recreation and views. Livable Community Objective 3-: Provide Housing Choices a. Include single:-family homes, condominiums and apartments in a variety of architectural styles and prices to meet the needs of people of all ages and incomes. b. Mix different housing prices and styles in the same building or block. c. Focus affordable housing near jobs. Livable Community Objective 4: Plan for Mixed Uses a. Create multipurpose destinations by locating housing, workplaces, shopping, daily services, schools, parks, civic places and public facilities tog~ther in an area. b. Cluster diverse, complementary uses within walking distance 10 allow people to conveniently live, work and shop in.a place. c. Connect rather than separate uses to allow functional relationships between them. V:\LlBRAR y\cOMMUNOV1OpponunityGJWllS2002120020l'GrantCritcria.doc " 4 Cj?5</ Livable Communities Opportunity Grants Projects Funded in 2001 ". . . Projects in Anoka, Apple Valley, Blaine, Bumsville: Dayton, Excelsior, Hastings, Rosemount, Roseville and St. Paul were awarded a total of $500,000 in 200 I to support projects in the predevelopment stage, which show promise of evolving into demonstration projects. Heart of Anoka, Anoka-Grant awarded to help develop models and preferred options for neighborhood infill and transit-oriented development, with connections to the Northstar Corridor and Mississippi River. Comments: . Opportunity tolink to NorthStar corridor . Tied into Heart of Anoka project . Close ties to the river . Requested work is timely and needed . Good partn~ring ~th public and private entities Galaxie Avenue, Apple Yalley~t a'Yarde<;l.to help shape amQre compa~t, transit-orien,ted , development pattern on an undeveloped site in a fast-'growing suburb. Comments: , . Good opportunity to shape a more coIiIpact development pattern in a fast growing suburb . Relates to transit . Timing is right to d.o this - community is experiencing development pressure . Proactive partnering Town Square, Blaine-Grant awarded to help plan development of a town center with integrated land uses in a fast-growing area. Comments: . Good potential to develop a suburban town center . City may get integrated land-use through this project . Good opportunity to influence development in fast-growing area Strip Center Re-Use, Bumsville-Grant awarded to help develop land use plans, and market and economic analyses for the re-use of three outdated strip mall sites. The city has more than 40 strip malls, and like many cities, is concerned about the high number of vacancies, large, underutilized parking lots, lack of pedestrian and transit amenities and deteriorated and outdated facades. Comments: . Address an important regional issue - reuse for outmoded retail sites specific to their location . Highly replicable . Intends to integrate new uses with surrounding neighborhoods Historic Village Revitalization, Dayton-Grant awarded to promote growth management plans and .prac~ice~ in a developing comrpjmity at the urban edge. Comments: . Opportunity to manage growth in a developing fringe area . .. May be replicable model for areas built without sewer transitioning to sewer ~65 Making New History, Excelsior-Grant awarded to create a redevelopment plan and identify strategies to facilitate the redevelopment of downtown Excelsior, incorporating mixed-use development that links land use with pedestrian and transit systems, considers environmental impacts and improves water quality in Lake Minnetonka and treats stormwater runoff.: .~ . Comments: . There is development pressure and this proposal can address growth in a positive way. . SW regional trail goes through town. . The project could be a model for enhancing access to parks. . Water quality is a priority in the application, . Staff applauds the applicant for its efforts to protect Lake Minnetonka water quality. Historic Downtown, Hastings-Grant awarded to plan redevelopment and infiH to achieve more compact, higher density, walkable areas, addressing the impact of a future commuter-rail station and environmental issues related to the Mississippi River. Comments: . Good proposal to manage infiH mid more density in a traditional downtown. . City is open to trying differen~ water quality de~ices . . . Project helps lay the land use grouridwork for the future Red Rock corridor'transitway. Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Rosemount-Grant awarded to develop an action plan, design guidelines, financial strategies and market studies for private downtown development, and redesign and investment in public spaces. Comments: . High growth community; opportunity to manage growth. . Could be an opportunity to work with city on stormwater issues. . Potential for a good edge-community demonstration. . Replicable. Twin Lakes Redevelopment Plan, RoseviHe--Grant awarded to complete a development plan for the last site in Roseville available for development on a major scale, connecting jobs and housing and integrating green space. Comments: . Potential to be a unique model to link housing and workplaces. . Is the last site in Roseville for development on a major scale. . Involves a brownfield plus transition of a greenfield. . Application includes goals and plans to improve the natural environment. . The site is located within the I-35W Corridor Coalition area, and is the top redevelopment priority of the Coalition. University A venue Transit-Oriented Development, St. Paul-Grant awarded to help lay the foundation for initiatives that link the future Central Corridor to adjacent land uses at station locations.. -. Comments: . This project wi111ay the groundwork for land use that links to the future Central Corridor, a regional transit corridor priority. . . . It is very important to do this kind of planning in preparation for development of transitways. ~6'~ ATTACHMENT E (Sample) RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF , MINNESOTA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR AN OPPOPRTUNITY GRANT THROUGH THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM WHEREAS the City of is a participant in the livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2002 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to make application for funds under the livable Communities Demonstration Account; and WHEREAS the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Demonstration Account's purpose/s and criteria; and WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS The City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and WHEREAS the City Council of , Minnesota agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the opportunity grant application submitted on , 2002, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of and to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Mayor Clerk V:\LIBRAR Y\COMMUN DV\OpponunityGr.onts2002120020PGrnnlApplication.doc '?b"/ /61.. City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651)463-7111 Fax (651)463-2591 www.d.farmington.mn.us TO: Mayor, Council Members, City Administrator f c FROM: Kevin Carroll, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Schedule Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop Date- Miscellaneous Pending and Anticipated Community Development Issues DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTIONIDISCUSSION Input and guidance from the Planning Commission and the City Council would be very useful with regard to certain pending and anticipated community development issues. The topics in question are generating an increasing number of questions from residents, developers and other interested parties, and the subjects are complex and time-consuming enough to make it impractical to try to deal with them during regular Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Briefly, the proposed topics for discussion include: 1. The parcels of property that are designated as "Restricted Development" areas in the Comprehensive Guide Plan (generally located east of Akin Road, west of Trunk Highway 3, and north of 208th Street). 2. The possibility of reviewing, clarifying and/or revising City policies and procedures regarding the handling of future requests/petitions for annexation. 3. The updating/revising of existing City Code provisions regarding signs. More information regarding these subjects would, of course, be provided to the City Council and the Planning Commission well in advance of the workshop. City staff members are suggesting that the workshop be conducted on Tuesday, May 28, 2002. The meeting would begin at 5:00 p.m., and dinner would be provided. ACTION REOUESTED Indicate the availability of the Council to meet with the Planning Commission at 5:00 p.m. on May 28, 2002 to discuss the pending and anticipated community development issues identified above. in Carroll mmunity Development Dir . co5'"f!' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.ci.farmington.mn.us 10m TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ed Shukle City Administrator SUBJECT: League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION The League of Minnesota Cities conducts its annual conference each June. This year the conference is going to be held in Rochester, Minnesota at the Mayo Civic Center. The theme is "New Neighbors, New Citizens, New Ways." The dates of the conference are June 18 - 21. DISCUSSION Attached is information about the conference. I would recommend that you take a look at it and seriously consider attending. The sessions are educational and informative. The opportunity to network with other elected officials from around the state is an added benefit. It would be nice to have representation from Farmington. I plan to attend as well. BUDGET IMPACT There are funds available for your attendance and participation. ACTION REQUESTED Consider attending the annual LMC Conference. ~6'? ''If civilization is to survive, we must cultivate the science of human relationships-the ability of all peoples, of all kinds, to live together, in the same world at peace. " -Franklin D. Roosevelt Award Winning Rochester, Minnesota Home of the world-renowned Mayo Medical Center Home of the largest IBM complex under one roof Home to prestigious awards that place it among Americas Most Liveable Cities Home to 85,806 adults, kids, e!ders, men, women, mechanics, nurses, artists, executives, pet lovers, teachers, athletes, community builders, and dreamers-a diversity of cultures and communities Host to LMCs 2002 Annual Conference 2002 LMC Annual Conference Minnesota is home to a rich diversity of cultures. Our first immigrants arrived in the 1830s to work in lumbering and farming. New neighbors of African descent moved to Minnesota after the Civil War, and lived and worked mainly in Minnesota's cities. By 1900, Scandinavians outnumbered those from any single country. Later, nearly half of all Minnesotans were of German ancestry. In the 1920s, migrant farm workers of Mexican descent made way for Spanish- speaking citizens, and in the 1980s, Minnesota became home to many Southeast Asian refugees. j~ ,. 1 t The 2000 Census tells Minnesota's latest story of a changing cultural landscape. Whether you're a leader in a rural city or in the metro, whatever the economic base of your community, whatever your city's opportunities disguised as challenges-you are leading in a climate of unparalleled change, LMC's 2002 Annual Conference brings you this year's Conference theme-New Neighbors, New Citizens, New Ways. It's exclusively geared to leaders like you, spotlighting strategies and inspiration to help you connect effectively with all your citizens! LMC Annual Conference Overview Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, June 18 June 19 June 20 June 21 Registration Cities' Exposition Cities' Exposition Cultural Diversity Open-3 p,m, 7:30 a,m,-6 p,m, 7:30-11:30 a,m, Community Exhibitor Opening Keynote: LMC Cities' Forum Breakfast-S a.m. Welcome Michael A, Guido, a moderated discussion City Achievement Reception-4 p,m, Mayor, Dearborn with Minnesotas Awards-9 a,m, Minnesota Cities: Michigan-S:45 Gubernatorial Finale Keynote: The Greatest Conference Within a candidates-8:30 a.m, Edward T. Show on Earth Conference-l0:45 a.m. Spotlight on Creagan, MD featuring world- Concurrent Sessions Homeland Security 9 a.m. famous Lazer 10:45 a.m, 10:45 a,m. Close-ll:30 a.m. Vaudeville Spotlight on Spouses 6:30 p.m. Exhibitor and MWCG and Partners Luncheons-12 p,m, Ed Fischer, political Mini.Conference: cartoonis~10:45 a.m, Meeting Challenges Concurrent Sessions Facing All Elected 10:45 a,m, Officials-l:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions Mayors' Association 1 :30 p.m, Luncheon and LMC Annual Meeting LMC Sponsors' Circle 12p,m, Door Prize Awards Concurrent Sessions 4:45 p.m. 2:30 p,m. City Night in Rochester Reception for Mayors featuring great food and Hermans Hermits! 5-6 p,m. 6p.m, LMC Reception and Awards Banquet-6 p.m, Register online anytime: www.lmnc.org C\?CC/ Opening Keynote Address WEDNESDAY. JUNE 19.2002.8:45 A,M, Strengthening the Bonds of Community: Committing to the Common Good Michael A, Guido, Mayor, Dearborn, Michigan Michael Guido has been the Mayor of his hometown since 1986. The son ofItalian immigrants to America, Mayor Guido developed a deep appreciation for Dearborn's enviable way of life, which fueled his passion for serving the citizens of his city, and for helping it prosper. At 23, he became the youngest person elected to Dearborn's City Council, and after serving two terms, he became the youngest Mayor in Dearborn's history. Mayor Guido bases his administration on values of public service, accountability and accessibility. He adds a focus on innovation, and technologies that deliver services effectively and efficiently. His vision and leadership have strengthened Dearborn's neighborhoods, bolstered its downtown business and catalyzed growth in its industrial, manufacturing and technology sectors. His record of success has contributed to his emergence as a national leader, shaping public policies that affect America's urban centers. Mayor Guido is a member of the Board of Directors of the National League of Cities, and since Sept. 11, has co-chaired NLC's Homeland Security Committee. Additionally, he serves on the Executive Committee of the United States Conference of Mayors. LMC Cities' Forum THURSDAY. JUNE 20. 2002. 8:30 A.M. Meet Minnesota's Gubernatorial Candidates! With Political Commentary by Lilly Goren, Ph.D, and Lisa Disch, Ph.D. In November, Minnesota will elect its Governor-in this year's Forum, gubernatorial candidates speak directly to the issues that affect local government. The candidates' discussion will be moderated by two well-informed and energetic political science leaders from Minnesota's academic community. Lilly Goren, Political Science Chair at the College of St. Catherine, and Lisa Disch, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Minnesota, add sparkle and wit with commentary guaranteed to broaden your understanding and point of view. Finale Keynote Address FRlDAY. JUNE 21. 2002. 9:00 A,M, How to Live Long Enough to Collect Your Pension: Proven Tips for the Long Haul Edward T. Creagan, MD, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Medical School Many conference-goers will remember Dr. Creagan from LMC's 1999 visit to Rochester. He was such a hit, we invited him back! He's got more to say to us following the distressful events of Sept. 11, motivating our city's leaders to cultivate healthful attitudes and practices proven to keep us in the game for the long haul. Once again, Dr. Creagan translates the wisdom of Rochester's world-class health industry to the interests of effective local government. He is a consultant in the Division of Medical Oncology at Mayo Clinic and is currently the American Cancer Society Professor of Clinical Oncology and the Rouse Professor of Humanism in Medicine. Dr. Creagan earned his medical credentials in Philadelphia and New York, then specialized in internal medicine at the University of Michigan. He was . appointed to the staff of the National Cancer Institute and then arrived at Mayo Clinic, remaining there for over 25 years. Dr. Creagan is known for his engaging speaking style and entertaining observations oflife. Register online anytime: www.lmnc.org 2002 LMC Annual Conference C?t;J< Wednesday, June 19 day Spotlights erence Within a Conference (CWC): bors, New Citizens, New Ways: Ahead Together MWCG Mini-Conference: Meeting Challenges Facing All Elected Officials Concurrent Sessions I/Choose One 10:45 a.m.-12 p.m. Implementing an EPA Stormwater Program in 3 Months or Less National Standards for Fire Departments 24 Hour City Hall: E-Gov't Basic Tools & More Show Me the Money: The Evolving State-Local Fiscal Relationship City and Community Organizations: Working to Benefit the Community ewc Session #1: What Makes a Welcoming Community? Concurrent Sessions II/Choose One 1 :30-2:45 p.m. Reclaiming Our Community History Consolidation of Public Safety Services: Should We or Shouldn't We? CyberCrime & Information Security LMC 2002 Legislative Update MWCG Mini-Conference: Meeting Challenges Facing All Elected Officials, Part 1 ewc Session #2: Understanding and Achieving Cultural Competency at City Hall Concurrent Sessions III/Choose One 3: 15-4:45 p.m. Especially for Youth Delegates: Topic To Be Announced Regional Cooperation in Rural Minnesota Special Assessments: An Overview of Use and Process 10 Do's & Don'ts for City Councils Threatened with Litigation MWCG Mini-Conference: Meeting Challenges Facing All Elected Officials, Part 2 ewc Session #3: Multicultural Communities: Strategies and Resources 2002 LMC Annual Conference Thursday, June 20 Spotlights , Forum 2002: esota's Gubernatorial Candidates! mmentary by Lilly Goren, Ph.D and Lisa Disch, Ph.D Featured Track: Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Spotlight on Spouses and Partners: What's So Funny? Political Cartoom with Ed Fischer Concurrent Sessions IV/Choose One 10:45 a.m.-12 p.m. Especially for Youth Delegates: Topic to be announced Eye of the Beholder: How Different Groups View the Same Issue Especially for Small Cities: Top 10 Personnel Practices & Issues ofIncerest (presented in cooperation with the Minnesota Association of Small Cities) Especially for Metro Cities: Housing-Secrets to Success in Your Community Especially for Greater MN Urban Centers: Annexation Anxieties (presented in cooperation with the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities) Featured Track: Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness Local Leaders Mobilizing the Community Spotlight on Spouses and Partners: What's So Funny? Political Canoons with Ed Fischer Concurrent Sessions V /Choose One 2:30-4:30 p.m. Downtown Development in a Changing World Planning for Your Future Workforce Especially for Metro Cities: Metropolitan Council Forum (presented in cooperation with the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities) Especially for Greater MN Urban Centers: Comprehensive Planning for Rapid Growth Featured Track: Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness Is Your City Ready For Disaster? Register online anytime: www.lmnc.org ~~3 Wednesday Highlights Thursday Highlights A Conference Within a Conference: New Neighbors, New Citizens, New Ways: Moving Ahead Together Take advantage of this day-long look at our featured topic-leading within Minnesota's increasingly diverse cultural landscape. Featured strategies and tools will assist you to be a more effective leader in today's climate of change, A 3-session workshop (no' additional fee required) . What Makes a Welcoming Community? with follow-up comments from Keynote Speaker Mayor Michael Guido · Understanding and Achieving Cultural Competency at City Hall . Multicultural Communities: Strategies and Resources LMC Cities' Forum 2002 Meet Minnesota's Gubernatorial Candidates! With Political Commentary by Lilly Goren, Ph,D. and Lisa Disch, Ph.D. Featured Track Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness The tragic events of 911 remind city leaders to take steps to review and update their city's emergency management plan, Attend Thursday's featured track and hear a local community's remarkable story. Later, learn the role of the elected official in an emergency and participate in a fascinating tabletop demonstration. . Local Leaders Mobilizing the Community 10:45 a.m.-12 p.m. · Is Your City Ready for Disaster? 2:30-4:30 p,m. What's So Funny? Political Cartoons with Ed Fischer Spotlight on Spouses and Partners! 10:45 a.m.-12 p.m. This year's speaker is sure to provide just the right blend oflaugh-out-loud canoons, quotes, and tales! Ed Fischer is the editorial canoonist for the Rochester Post-Bulletin and is syndicated in 90 other newspapers. His cartoons have been reprinted in Time and Newsweek magazines and in the World Book Encyclopedia, as well as many text- books and other publications. "My business is to make people laugh," Ed Fischer says. "If there's a message there to help or enrich people's lives, so much the better." A Mini-Conference: Meeting Challenges Facing All Elected Officials Presented by Minnesota Women in City Government 1:30-5 p.m. LMC Sponsors' Circle Door Prize Awards Door Prizes Every City Can Use! 4:45-6 p.m. Visit Cities' Exposition 2002 to win great prizes for your city, (You must be present to win!) Mayors' Reception Sponsored by the Minnesota Mayors' Association 5-6 p.m. I Networking Highlights and Family Fun in Rochester! Exhibitors' Welcome Reception Our exhibitors greet you at Registration with tasty bites and a cash bar that's a perfect warm-up for the Kickoff Event that follows! City Night in Rochester Features Herman's Hermits! The Herman's Hermits Concert is not included in your registration fee" reservation and additional $6 fee required. Sign up on the Registration Form. Minnesota Cities: The Greatest Show on Earth Thrill to a wild and wonderful circus theme, featuring world-famous Lazer Vaudeville! Bring the Family Visit southeast Minnesota's Amish Country, or tour Mayo Clinic's state-of-the-art facilities, featuring the Gonda Building" the new gem of the Rochester skyline, Bonus Fun-Free Admission to Rochesterfest! All Annual Conference participants receive a Rochesterfest button". free admission to many delightful activities that celebrate Rochester! Register online anytime: www.lmnc.org 2002 LMC Annual Conference CCf~c.j Registration form Register online anytime: www.lmnc.org 2002 League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference . June 18-21, 2002 · Rochester, Minnesota Cancellation/Substitution Policy: If you are registered and cannot altend. we encourage you to send a substitute. If you cannot send a substitute. a cancdlation fee ($75 for Full Conference or $50 for One-Day) will be applied if wrilten cancellation is faxed. e-mailed or postmarked by 4:30 p,m.. May 31. 2002, Cancdlations are not accepted by phone, We regret that no refunds will be made after May 31. 2002. If your registration was paid. LMC will refund the balance, If your registf3,tion was not paid yet, LMC will bill your city for the balance due. Fax cancellation notice to Rebecca Erickson at (651) 281-1296. e-mail to rerickso@lmnc,org. or mail to: League of Minnesota Cities. Altn: Rebecca Erickson. 145 University Avenue West, St, Paul. MN 55103-2044. Duplicate this form for multiple registrations, Please lJpe or prinr clearly. Registration OptionslF ees: For <ompkte derails on what your registration fee includeJ. see pag< at right. Option # 1: D Full Conference Registration o Advance Registration: $315 (through May 31. 2002) o On-Site Registration: $345 (after May 31,2002) o Company Rep Registration: $495 Option #2: One-Day Only Registration (se'mon/y'MdAy) D Wednesday-Only Registration or D Thursday-Only Registration (riD<s not indu.. Awanh &"'I""') o Advance RegiStration: $180 (through May 31, 2002) o On-Site RegiStration: $195 (after May 31.2002) Option #3: D Youth Delegate Registration o Youth Delegate Discowlled Registration: $75 o Adult Chaperone Discounted Registration: $75 Registrant Information: Name for badge City or organization Mailing address City City contact: Registration confirmation will be mailed to your city cln-k at cilJ hall, or we'll e-mail it to the following address: TIde State Daytime phone ( Zip Youth Delegate Registrant Information: For <ompkte derails. see page at right. Youth name for badge Mailing address City Registration confimultion will be mailed to you at the address above. or =11 e-mail it to the following address: Chaperone name for badge City or organization State Zip o 1 will mend the MWCG luncheon on Wednesday. June 19 (held during the Exhibitors' Luncheon), (There is no additional fee for this luncheon,) Family & Guest Registrationmckets: Name for badge Name for badge Name for badge Family & Guest Meal & Event Tickets: Wednesday Exhibitor Luncheon _ cicket(s) @ $12 each Wednesday City Night Picnic Mea1_ ticket(s) @ $14 each o Adult 0 Child o Adult 0 Child o Adult 0 Child Family and Guest Registration: There is no fee for family members or guests to altend conference sessions. but meal tickets must be purchased separately. Thursday Mayors' Luncheon _ cicket(s) @ $18 each Thursday Awards Banquet_ cicket(s} @ $30 each Purchase Herman's Hermits concert tickets below ...., o Reserve _ spotts) at the Hetman's Hermits Concert on June 19. I will include an additional fee of$6 per person. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $ o Check enclosed payable to League of Minnesota Cines o Please bill the city Mail form with payment to: League of Minnesota Cities. Finance Depanment-AC. 145 University Avenue West. St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Fax form to: (651) 281-1296. Acen: Rebecca Erickson ?J~6 Registration information . Advance Registration: $315 (through May 31,2002) On-Site Registration: $345 (after May 31. 2002) Company Rep Registration: $495 Registration Fee includes Admission to conference sessions Admission to Cities' Exposition 2002. including: - Exhibitor Welcome Reception - Exhibitor Luncheon - LMC Sponsors' Circle Door Prize Awards (must bt pment to win) Admission to all conference networking events. including: - Minnesota Cities: The Greatest Show on Earth - City Night in Rochester' - Mayors' Association Luncheon and LMC Annual Meeting - LMC Reception & Awards Banquet - City Achievement Awards - Friday Community Breakfast 'y"ur rtgistration fit DOES NOT include a ticlttt to tht Hnman's Hamits concur. A $6 fit is rtquirtd---<htck box and pay on &gistration Form. 3 Easy Ways to Register: JEj Register online anytime: _.Imnc.org One-Day Conference Registration 2 BIG CHOICES: . nl Ro 'sttauon ....,..1_-.1-'y-O y eg1 . weuue5U"- ~ 'strauon or Thursday-Only eg1 Wednesday-Only Fee includes Admission to all Wednesday conference sessions Admission to Cities' Exposition 2002 (Wed.,funt 19 only) including: - Exhibitor & MWCG Luncheons - LMC Sponsors' Circle Door Prize Awards (must be pment to win) Admission to 2 conference networking events. including: - Minnesota Cities: The Greatest Show on Earth - City Night in Rochester Coming Wednesday only? Here's what you'll miss: Admission to Cities' Exposition 2002 (Thurs., fuTU 20) LMC Cities' Forum 2002 Thursday's Concurrent Sessions Mayors' Association Luncheon and LMC Annual Meeting Mayors' Reception LMC Reception & Awards Banquet City Achievement Awards Friday Community Breakfast Finale Keynote Advance Registration: $180 (through May 31, 2002) On-site Registration: $195 (after May 31, 2002) Thursday-Only Fee includes . Admission to all Thursday and Friday conference sessions . Mayors' Association Luncheon and LMC Annual Meeting . City Achievement Awards . Friday Community Breakfast . Admission to Cities' Exposition 2002 (Thurs., funt 20 only) (Nott: tht Thursday-Only Fe< dots not include rht LMC Rtctption and Awards BanqW!t, which is an additional fit of $30) Coming Thursday only? Here's what you'll miss: Admission to Cities' Exposition 2002 (Wed.,funt 19) Exhibitor & MWCG Luncheons LMC Sponsors' Circle Door Prize Awards (must be pm",t to win) Opening Keynote Wednesday Concurrent Sessions Minnesota Cities: The Greatest Show on Earth City Night in Rochester Mail completed registration form to: League of Minnesota Cities Finance Dept.-AC 145 University Ave. West St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 t?J Conference Location: Mayo Civic Center. 30 Civic Center Drive. S.E.. Rochester. MN 55906, Phone: (800) 422-2199, Special Needs: . If you have special dietary needs (vegetarian. kosher. ere,), please attach a written description to the Registration Form. . If you or your guest are disabled and require special services or transportation. please attach a written description to the Registration Form, I City Staff and Elected Officials: If you are a staff or elected official of a city, you must register as a Delegate rather than attend as a spouse. family member. or guest, Youth Delegate Discounted Registration Fee: $75 Adult Chaperone Discounted Registration Fee: $75 . Youth delegates must be 14-18 years old. . Youth delegates are welcome at all conference sessions! . Youth delegates must be accompa- nied by an adult chaperone at all conference activities. A chaperone is any responsible adult not otherwise registered for the conference, . Registration fees are reduced for youth delegates and chaperones, Chaperone discount does not apply to city elected or administrative officials, . Parents or guardians may be required to sign a liability waiver for youth delegates engaging in specific group activities. Registration Fee includes . Admission to all conference sessions and activities . Most meals are provided Registration Fee does not include . Hotel. transportation. Herman's Hermits concen, and some meals ~ Fax completed registration form to: Rebecca Erickson at (651) 281-1296 <6~C;; Housing information Reserve your housing online anytime: www.lmnc.org 2002 League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference · June 18-21, 2002 · Rochester, Minnesota low to reserve your housing . All hotel reservations must be made using the form below and submitted to the Rochester Convention and Visitors Bureau online at www.lmnc.org or by fax or mail. No telephone reservations will be accepted. . Reservations must be guaranteed by providing a deposit of one night's rental with a major credit card, . Confirmation will arrive directly from the hotel. Housing deadlines . Reservations must be received by May 20, 2002. After this date, reservations may be made directly with the hotel of your choice, . Reservations will be made on a first-come, first- served basis based on the send date (online and fax) or on the postmark (mail) date of your housing request. Priority for reservations with the same send/postmark date will be determined by a random drawing. Housing changes/cancellations . All changes and cancellations must be handled through the Housing Bureau by calling 1-800- 634-8277, ext. 106, by May 20, 2002. After this date, all housing changes and cancellations must be made directly with the hotel. Hotel I nformation and Rates Rates listed here do not include an additional] 0% lodging tax per room per night. Rates listed may be higher with two or more people per room, Conference Hotels Connected to Skyway: Kahler Grand Hotel-$89 Rochester Marriott----:"$149 Holiday Inn City Centre-$89 Economy Inn-$69 Executive Suites-$89 Radisson Plaza Hotel-$109 Hilton Garden Inn-$89 Conference Hotels Not Connected to Skyway: Best Western Soldiers Field Towers & Suites $75 standard room $85 two-room suite, kitchenette Travelodge (formerly Ramada Limited)-$60 Comfort Inn-$60 Housing Reservation Form-2002 LMC Annual Conference r------ -------, I I I I I I I Mail or fax this completed form by May 20, 2002 to: Rochester Convention and Visitors Bureau LMCAnnual Conference Housing 150 South Broadway Suite A Rochester, MN 55904-6500 Fax: (507) 288-9144 Name Tide City or organization Address City State _ Zip Home phone ( Work phone ( Room Reservation Information: lndkau 3 choim of houls from cht list alJov.. If all tbru choictS ar< not available. anothn- houl will b. "kcted fir you. 1st: 2nd: 3rd: Total number of rooms needed: Special housing request: If you have special needs, please attach a written description to this housing form, e,g" wheelchair accessible room, etc. Room type Smoking Arrival Dcpanun 's.. bekJw Name(s) of person(s) stayin2 in room(s) (ei"I.....) date date YorN YorN YorN 'Room typt'-indicate a letter based on the following; not all types available at all hotels: A = I bed, I petson: B = I bed. 2 people: C = 2 beds, 2 people; 0 = 2 beds. 3 people: E ~ 2 beds. 4 people Hotel Reservation Deposit: Reservations must be guaranteed by providing a deposit equal to one night's lodging per room. Credit card company Card number Expiration date The LMC Housing Bureau is authorized to us~ the abov~ card to guaranre~ my horel r~strvations reserved by m~. I I understand that the first night's rental will b~ billed through this card if I fail to show up fir my assi~d housing on th~ confirmed dat~, unless I canc~l my reservations with th~ horel prior to 4:00 p. m. on th~ day of arrivaL I Cardholder signature Date L___________~__________________________~ Retain a copy of this form' for your records. ~&/ AMISH TOUR RESERVATION FORM NAME ADDRESS CIlY MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO CITY OF ROCHESTER AND SEND TO: PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 201 4 STREET SE - ROOM 150 ROCHESTER, MN 55904 ATTENTION: AMISH TOUR FEE PAID ~~'1? LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE FAMILY ACTIVITIES PLUMMER HOUSE TOUR & LUNCH TOUR OF GONDA BUILDING THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2002 COST: $11.95 PER PERSON LIMITED TO THE FIRST 40 PEOPLE TOUR INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING: ~ SELF-GUIDED TOUR OF PLUMMER HOUSE OF THE ARTS The Plummer House is the former home of Dr. Henry Plummer, who was associated with the Doctors Mayo. A tour guide will be at the House to answer any questions you may have of the House. ~ LUNCH - A choice of either chicken salad or seafood salad and all the trimmings ~ TOUR OF THE GONDA BUILDING The Gonda Building opened in 2001. It is the centerpiece of the most extensive building program in Mayo Clinic history. The 20- story building is linked with the Mayo Building and the Charlton Building of Rochester Methodist. Hospital, forming the largest interconnected medical facility of its kind in the world - more than 3.5 million square feet. ITINERARY 11:00 a.m. 12:00 noon 1:15 p.m. Bus leaves from the Mayo Civic Center Lobby for Plummer House Lunch Bus leaves for tour of Gonda Building (Tour lasts about one hour) Following the Gonda Building Tour, you are free to head back to your. hotel or visit some of Rochester's other downtown sites. PLUMMER HOUSE/GONDA BUILDING TOURS REGISTRATION FORM NAME CITY ADDRESS MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF ROCHESTER AND SEND TO: FEE PAID PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ATTENTION: CITY TOUR 201 4 STREET SE - ROOM 150 ROCHESTER, MN 55904 Please select one: CHICKEN SALAD SEAFOOD SALAD '15(09' City of Farmington 325 Oak Street, Farmington, MN 55024 (651) 463-7111 Fax (651) 463-2591 www.cLfarmington.mn.us /01] TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ed Shukle City Administrator SUBJECT: 2003 Budget Goals Workshop DATE: May 6, 2002 INTRODUCTION In preparing the 2003 Budget, I would like to begin the process by having the City Council establish some budget goals. The Management Team would like direction in terms of expenditure targets so that we can develop a budget that will continue to provide quality service to our customers at the least possible cost. We also want to develop a budget that will meet the demands of our growing community. DISCUSSION We would like to schedule the meeting for Wednesday, June 5 or Wednesday, June 12, 7 p.m. ACTION REOUESTED Set 2003 Budget Workshop for either of the above dates. <:($'70